Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (24): 4735-4746.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.24.007

• PLANT PROTECTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Imidacloprid Flowable Concentrate for Maize Seed Coating on the Arthropod Community and the Main Non-Targeted Insect Pests in Maize Field

LI GuanNan, MIAO ChangJian, LI WeiZheng, WANG GaoPing, LIU XiaoLan, GUO XianRu, YAN FengMing   

  1. College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002
  • Received:2017-06-12 Online:2017-12-16 Published:2017-12-16

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of imidacloprid flowable concentrate for seed coating (FSC) on the arthropod community and the non-targeted insects in maize field, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the application of seed coating agent.【Method】The study was conducted in the experimental field in Xuchang Campus of Henan Agricultural University from June to September in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Maize seeds were coated with the recommended dose of 600 g·L-1 imidacloprid FSC and its doubled and quadrupled dose, with water as control. Each treatment was repeated for 4 times and arranged with randomized block. The density of the arthropods in maize field was estimated by using 5 sampling spots methods, each spot with 10 tagged plants at seedling, bellmouthed, booting and filling stages of the maize plants. The characteristics of the arthropod community including arthropod species and their amounts in different treatment areas were analyzed. In order to analyze the effects of imidacloprid FSC on non-targeted insects, the amount of insect pests in maize ears within the sampling spots at filling stage and the amount of lepidopteran larvae in maize ears and stalks by sampling 100 plants within two lines at mature period were surveyed. 【Result】Imidacloprid FSC treatment had no effect on the number of species of arthropod in maize field, and the species richness in the treatment areas showed similar change trend to that in the control area. The difference of the richness in different treated plots at the same time was related to the low density and uneven distribution of some species. Seed coating could not lead to the decrease of the diversity and evenness of the arthropod community. When the population of target pest, Rhopalosiphum maidis, occurred at high level, the diversity and evenness in seed coating areas could be increased by inhibiting the target pests. The effects of imidacloprid FSC on the dominant species differed with maize growth stages in different years. In 2015, R. maidis occurred at higher population density, the dominant species of the phytophagous insects and predators in seed coating plots were similar to that in control plot at early growth stage of maize, while Pseudaletia separata and Erigonidium graminicolum were the dominant species in plots of 2 times and 4 times doses of maximum recommended doses (MRD). In 2016, when R. maidis occurred at lower population density, Ostrinia furnacalis and Helicoverpa armigera were dominant phytophagous species, and Propylea japonica and Harmonia axyridis became the dominant species of predators. The dominance degree showed similar change trend to dominant concentration index. The impact of seed coating on ear-feeding lepidopteran larvae was complex. For example, the population density of O. furnacalis in the treated plots was higher than or equivalent to that in the control plots during early and middle grain-filling, and the density of Dichocrocis punctiferalis larvae also increased significantly at the early grain-filling stage, but decreased at the middle grain-filling stage. For P. separata, the density in seed coating plots increased significantly than that in control plot at middle filling stage, while the density of H. armigera in seed coating plots differed from the check plots with no remarkable degree. The results of the two-year investigations showed that the density of O. furnacalis, D. punctiferalis and P. separata had an increasing trend in seed coating plots, but it was not closely related to the dosage of seed coating agent of 600 g·L-1 imidacloprid. 【Conclusion】It is recommended that lepidopteran pests should be prevented or controlled in the maize field with application of imidacloprid coating agent.

Key words: imidacloprid, seed coating agent, maize, arthropod community, non-target pests

[1]    MANSFIELD S, DILLON M L, WHITEHOUSE M E A. Are arthropod communities in cotton really disrupted? An assessment of insecticide regimes and evaluation of the beneficial disruption index. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 113(1/4): 326-335.
[2]    MUNYULIA M B T, LUTHER G C, KYAMANYWAC S. Effects of cowpea cropping systems and insecticides on arthropod predators in Uganda and Democratic Republic of the Congo. Crop Protection, 2007, 26(2): 114-126.
[3]    郦卫弟, 吴孔明, 陈学新, 封红强, 徐广, 郭予元.华北地区转Cry1A+CpTI和Cry1A基因棉棉田害虫和天敌昆虫的群落结构. 农业生物技术学报, 2013, 11(5): 494-499.
LI W D, WU K M, CHEN X X, FENG H Q, XU G, GUO Y Y. Effects of transgenic cotton carrying Cry1A+CpTI and Cry1A genes on the structures and composion of pest and beneficial arthropod communities in cotton field in north China. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2003, 11(5): 494-499. (in Chinese)
[4]    郭井菲, 张聪, 袁志华, 何康来, 王振营. 转cry1Ie基因抗虫玉米对田间节肢动物群落多样性的影响. 植物保护学报, 2014, 41(4): 482-489.
GUO J F, ZHANG C, YUAN Z H, HE K L, WANG Z Y. Impacts of transgenic maize with cry1Ie gene on arthropod biodiversity in the fields. Acta Phytophylacica Sinca, 2014, 41(4): 482-489. (in Chinese)
[5]    郭建英, 万方浩, 胡雅辉, 严盈. 不同作物布局方式对转基因抗虫棉田节肢动物群落结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(9): 2061- 2068.
GUO J Y, WAN F H, HU Y H, YAN Y. Effects of crop arrangement patterns on arthropod community structure in transgenic bollworm resistance cotton fields. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(9): 2061-2068. (in Chinese)
[6]    任振涛, 沈文静, 刘标, 薛堃. 转基因玉米对田间节肢动物群落多样性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(12): 2315-2325.
REN Z T, SHEN W J, LIU B, XUE K. Effects of transgenic maize on biodiversity of arthropod communities in the fields. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(12): 2315-2325. (in Chinese)
[7]    邵正飞, 缪勇, 王云. 玉米品种抗虫性对玉米田节肢动物群落的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(15): 281-284.
SHAO Z F, MIAO Y, WANG Y. Effects of pest resistance of maize varieties on arthropod community in maize fields. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(15): 281-284. (in Chinese)
[8]    史树森, 高月波, 臧连生, 杨微, 高敬伟. 不同杀虫剂对大豆田节肢动物群落结构的影响. 应用昆虫学报, 2012, 49(5): 1249-1254.
SHI S S, GAO Y B, ZANG L S, YANG W, GAO J W. Effects of several insecticides on the arthropod community in soybean fields. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2012, 49(5): 1249-1254. (in Chinese)
[9]    曾粮斌, 程毅, 严准, 马骏, 任顺祥, 魏林, 薛召东. 不同防治措施对花椰菜地节肢动物群落结构的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(15): 2965-2976.
ZENG L B, CHENG Y, YAN Z, MA J, REN S X, WEI L, XUE Z D. Effects of different control strategies on the structure of the arthropod community in the cauliflower field. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(15): 2965-2976. (in Chinese)
[10]   刘淑华, 施必富, 葛赏书, 杨保军, 刘泽文. 不同地区灰飞虱对吡虫啉的抗性. 植物保护, 2015, 41(2): 181-186.
LIU S H, SHI B F, GE S H, YANG B J, LIU Z W. Imidacloprid resistance in Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén) population from  different areas in China. Plant Protection, 2015, 41(2): 181-186. (in Chinese)
[11]   PONS X, ALBAJES R. Control of maize pests with imidacloprid seed dressing treatment in Catalonia (NE Iberian Peninsula) under traditional crop conditions. Crop Protection, 2002, 21(10): 943-950.
[12]   张国安, 赵惠燕. 昆虫生态学及害虫预测预报. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012: 129-132.
ZHANG G A, ZHAO H Y. Insect ecology and pest forecast. Beijing: Science Press, 2012: 129-132. (in Chinese)
[13]   黄顶成, 尤民生, 侯有明, 李志胜. 化学除草剂对农田生物群落的影响. 生态学报, 2005, 25(6): 1451-1458.
HUANG D C, YOU M S, HOU Y M, LI Z S. Effects of chemical herbicides on bio-communities in agroecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(6): 1451-1458. (in Chinese)
[14]   雒珺瑜, 张帅, 吕丽敏, 王春义, 朱香镇, 李春花, 崔金杰. 2009-2013年Bt棉田节肢动物群落多样性动态变化. 生态学报, 2016, 36(13): 4195-4203.
LUO J Y, ZHANG S, LÜ L M, WANG C Y, ZHU X Z, LI C H, CUI J J. Dynamic changes in the biodiversity of arthropod communities in transgenic Bt cotton fields between 2009 and 2013. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(13): 4195-4203. (in Chinese)
[15]   FARINOÓS G P, de la POZA M, HERNANDEZ-CRESPO P, ORTEGO F, CASTANERA P. Diversity and seasonal phenology of aboveground arthropods in conventional and transgenic maize crops in Central Spain. Biological Control, 2008, 44(3): 362-371.
[16]   刘志诚, 叶恭银, 胡萃, DATTA S K. 转cry1Ab/cry1Ac基因籼稻对稻田节肢动物群落影响. 昆虫学报, 2003, 46(4): 454-465.
LIU Z C, YE G Y, HU C, DATTA S K. Impact of transgenic indica rice with a fused gene of cry1Ab/cry1Ac on the rice paddy arthropod community. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2003, 46(4): 454-465. (in Chinese)
[17]   SISTERSON M S, BIGGS R W, OLSON C, CARRIERE Y, DENNEHY T J, TABASHNIK B E. Arthropod abundance and diversity in Bt and non-Bt cotton fields. Environmental Entomology, 2004, 33(4): 921-929.
[18]   刘俊峰, 邸宏, 曾兴, 裴海英, 周成生, 孟宪玉, 王术敏, 王振华. 转BcBCP1基因耐盐碱玉米对田间节肢动物群落的影响分析. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(3): 35-39.
LIU J F, DI H, ZENG X, PEI H Y, ZHOU C S, MENG X Y, WANG S M, WANG Z H. Effects of saline-alkali tolerant transgenic maize with BcBCP1 gene to arthropods in field. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2013, 21(3): 35-39. (in Chinese)
[19]   罗淑萍, 张永强, 黄寿山. 不同抗性品种稻田捕食性节肢动物的群落结构. 昆虫知识, 2006, 43(4): 453-460.
LUO S P, ZHANG Y Q, HUANG S S. Community structure of predatory arthropods in different resistant variety rice fields. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology, 2006, 43(4): 453-460. (in Chinese)
[20]   罗玉峰, 付浩龙, 白凯华, 彭世彰, 顾宏, 熊玉江, 李江安. 节水灌溉对稻田节肢动物群落结构及动态的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2014, 33(4/5): 338-342.
LUO Y F, FU H L, BAI K H, PENG S Z, GU H, XIONG Y J, LI J A. Effects of water-saving irrigation on community structure and dynamics of arthropod community in paddy field. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2014, 33(4/5): 338-342. (in Chinese)
[21]   田体伟, 王丽莎, 王燕, 郭线茹, 闫凤鸣, 李洪连. 3种新烟碱类种子处理剂对玉米及其主要害虫的影响. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(11): 73-78.
TIAN T W, WANG L S, WANG Y, GUO X R, YAN F M, LI H L . Effects of seed coating with imidacloprid and thiamethoxam on maize and main pests. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 44(11): 73-78. (in Chinese)
[22]   AYYANATH M M, CUTLER G C, SCOTT-DUPREE C D, SIBLEY P K. Transgenerational shifts in reproduction hormesis in green peach aphid exposed to low concentrations of imidacloprid. PloS One, 2013, 8(9): e74532.
[23]   GIROLAMI V, MARZARO M, VIVAN L, MAZZON L, GREATTI M, GIORIO C, MARTON D, TAPPARO A. Fatal powdering of bees in flight with particulates of neonicotinoids seed coating and humidity implication. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2012, 136(1/2): 17-26.
[24]   STRAUSBAUGH C A, EUJAYL I A, FOOTE P. Seed treatments for the control of insects and diseases in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar beet Research, 2010, 47(3/4): 105-125.
[25]   刘晓姣, 丁伟, 李永平. 吡虫啉拌种对烟蚜防效及烟草生长的影 响. 中国烟草学报, 2013, 20(6): 114-118.
LIU X J, DING W, LI Y P. Control effects of tobacco seed dressed with imidacloprid against Myzus persicae (Sulzer) and its impact on tobacco growth. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2013, 20(6): 114-118. (in Chinese)
[26]   ZHANG Z Q, ZHANG X F, ZHAO Y H, MU W, LIU F. Efficacy of insecticidal seed treatments against the wireworm Pleonomus canaliculatus (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in China. Crop Protection, 2017, 92: 134-142.
[1] CHAI HaiYan,JIA Jiao,BAI Xue,MENG LingMin,ZHANG Wei,JIN Rong,WU HongBin,SU QianFu. Identification of Pathogenic Fusarium spp. Causing Maize Ear Rot and Susceptibility of Some Strains to Fungicides in Jilin Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 64-78.
[2] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[3] LI ZhouShuai,DONG Yuan,LI Ting,FENG ZhiQian,DUAN YingXin,YANG MingXian,XU ShuTu,ZHANG XingHua,XUE JiQuan. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Yield and Combining Ability Based on Maize Hybrid Population [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1695-1709.
[4] XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[5] LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[6] QIU YiLei,WU Fan,ZHANG Li,LI HongLiang. Effects of Sublethal Doses of Imidacloprid on the Expression of Neurometabolic Genes in Apis cerana cerana [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1685-1694.
[7] MA XiaoYan,YANG Yu,HUANG DongLin,WANG ZhaoHui,GAO YaJun,LI YongGang,LÜ Hui. Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[8] LI Qian,QIN YuBo,YIN CaiXia,KONG LiLi,WANG Meng,HOU YunPeng,SUN Bo,ZHAO YinKai,XU Chen,LIU ZhiQuan. Effect of Drip Fertigation Mode on Maize Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[9] ZHANG JiaHua,YANG HengShan,ZHANG YuQin,LI CongFeng,ZHANG RuiFu,TAI JiCheng,ZHOU YangChen. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Modes on Starch Accumulation and Activities of Starch Synthesis-Related Enzyme of Spring Maize Grain in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1332-1345.
[10] TAN XianMing,ZHANG JiaWei,WANG ZhongLin,CHEN JunXu,YANG Feng,YANG WenYu. Prediction of Maize Yield in Relay Strip Intercropping Under Different Water and Nitrogen Conditions Based on PLS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138.
[11] LIU Miao,LIU PengZhao,SHI ZuJiao,WANG XiaoLi,WANG Rui,LI Jun. Critical Nitrogen Dilution Curve and Nitrogen Nutrition Diagnosis of Summer Maize Under Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 932-947.
[12] QIAO Yuan,YANG Huan,LUO JinLin,WANG SiXian,LIANG LanYue,CHEN XinPing,ZHANG WuShuai. Inputs and Ecological Environment Risks Assessment of Maize Production in Northwest China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 962-976.
[13] HUANG ZhaoFu, LI LuLu, HOU LiangYu, GAO Shang, MING Bo, XIE RuiZhi, HOU Peng, WANG KeRu, XUE Jun, LI ShaoKun. Accumulated Temperature Requirement for Field Stalk Dehydration After Maize Physiological Maturity in Different Planting Regions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 680-691.
[14] LI YaFei, SHI JiangLan, WU TianQi, WANG ShaoXia, LI YuNuo, QU ChunYan, LIU CongHui, NING Peng, TIAN XiaoHong. Effects of Combined Foliar Application of Zinc with Imidacloprid on Zinc Enrichment and Protein Components Content in Wheat Grain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 514-528.
[15] FANG MengYing,LU Lin,WANG QingYan,DONG XueRui,YAN Peng,DONG ZhiQiang. Effects of Ethylene-Chlormequat-Potassium on Root Morphological Construction and Yield of Summer Maize with Different Nitrogen Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4808-4822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!