Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (8): 1589-1603.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.08.010

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations

MA XiaoYan1(),YANG Yu1,HUANG DongLin1(),WANG ZhaoHui1,2(),GAO YaJun1,LI YongGang3,LÜ Hui4   

  1. 1College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Agro-Environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi
    2Northwest A&F University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi
    3Fufeng Agriculture Technology Extension Service Center, Fufeng 722200, Shaanxi
    4Fengxiang Agricultural Technology Extension Service Center, Fengxiang 721400, Shaanxi
  • Received:2021-03-03 Accepted:2021-05-26 Online:2022-04-16 Published:2022-05-11
  • Contact: DongLin HUANG,ZhaoHui WANG E-mail:Maxiaoyan12201122@163.com;dlynnhuang@nwafu.edu.cn;w-zhaohui@263.net

Abstract:

【Objective】The present study aimed to investigate the soil nutrients balance and economic benefits of different rotations with optimal chemical fertilizer application for wheat production, with the purpose of selecting a proper rotation for wheat production with lower fertilizer application and improvement of economic return for local farmers.【Method】The field experiments with randomized block design were carried out in Wugong county from 2018 to 2020, including four treatments: maize-wheat rotation with farmer accustomed fertilization (CWF), maize-wheat rotation with recommended fertilization (CWR), green manure-wheat rotation (GWR), and soybean-wheat rotation (BWR). Except for treatment of CWF, the fertilizers of rest three treatments were calculated according to the method of soil testing and determining fertilizer recommendations (STDFR). The plants tissues and soil with different depth were sampled for nutrients analysis.【Result】Compared with CWF, with 11.8% reduction of nitrogen and 41.7% reduction of phosphorus, the CWR treatment significantly increased wheat yield, with an average increase of 7.4%, and significantly increased the nitrogen and phosphorus uptake of wheat grain and aboveground shoot, with the nitrogen increase of 10.1% and 8.9% respectively, and the phosphorus increase of 9.8% and 6.4%, respectively. CWR treatment decreased the surplus rate of soil N, P and K by 25.1%, 72.3% and 54.4%, respectively, and increased the economic benefit by 36%. Among three different rotation, CWR rotation had the highest wheat yield, followed by soybean wheat rotation and green manure wheat rotation. GWR rotation had the lowest surplus ratio of NPK among three treatment with optimal fertilizer application, which was significantly lower than that of CWR and GWR rotation, with the decrease range of 87.3%-92.0%, 41.9%-67.7%, and 78.1%-85.3%, respectively, and obtained the highest economic return.【Conclusion】Fertilization recommendation by monitoring soil nutrients techniques could not only decrease fertilizer input and production cost, but also increase wheat yield, increase nutrient uptake of wheat grain, reduce surplus rate of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient balance, and thus improve economic benefits. Compared with maize-wheat rotation, the soybean-wheat rotation not only reduced the input of chemical fertilizer, significantly reduced the surplus of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, but also achieved higher economic benefits. In conclusion, it was recommended that the fertilizers application rates should be optimized for maize-wheat rotation in Guanzhong Plain. However, taking into account of economic return and ecological benefit, the soybean-wheat rotation was prior choice for the purpose of decreasing soil nutrients surplus and enhancing the economic return of farmers.

Key words: fertilizer reduction, maize-wheat rotation, green manure-wheat rotation, soybean-wheat rotation, nutrient balance, economic return, Guanzhong Plain, Shaanxi

Fig. 1

Average precipitation in Wugong County during 2018-2020 and 50 years (1971-2020)"

Table 1

Nutrients within fertilizers applied in different years and treatments"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
夏季作物 Summer crop 冬小麦 Winter wheat
N (kg·hm-2 ) P2O5 (kg·hm-2) K2O (kg·hm-2) N (kg·hm-2) P2O5 (kg·hm-2) K2O (kg·hm-2)
2018—2019 CWF 246 45 12 255 180 30
CWR 188 60 72 225 105 45
GWR 0 0 0 225 105 45
BWR 0 0 0 225 105 45
2019—2020 CWF 246 45 12 255 180 30
CWR 158 60 72 225 105 45
GWR 0 0 0 225 105 45
BWR 0 0 0 225 105 45

Table 2

Yield, biomass and nutrient return of different summer crops"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
籽粒产量
Grain yield
(kg·hm-2)
地上部还田生物量
Aboveground biomass (kg·hm-2)
氮素还田量
Nitrogen returning (kg·hm-2)
磷素还田量
Phosphorus returning (kg·hm-2)
钾素还田量
Potassium returning (kg·hm-2)
2018 CWF 4869a 6995a 89.0ab 8.4b 77.5b
CWR 6054a 7318a 129.3a 11.7b 131.5a
GWR 4914b 136.3a 21.3a 72.3b
BWR 667b 1035c 24.6c 6.3b 14.9c
2019 CWF 2917a 6312ab 66.2b 7.0b 50.2ab
CWR 3195a 7515a 80.9ab 7.8b 60.5a
GWR 4346b 92.3a 12.8a 33.5b
BWR 1597b 1572c 27.7c 3.7c 13.2c
平均 Mean CWF 3893a 6654ab 83.5ab 7.7c 115.2ab
CWR 4625a 7417a 109.3a 10.6b 122.1a
GWR 4630b 126a 21.5a 65.6b
BWR 1132b 1304c 32.5b 8.2b 19.3c

Table 3

Contents of aboveground biomass and yield components of wheat yield under different treatments"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
产量
Yield
(kg·hm-2)
地上部生物量干重
Biomass
(kg·hm-2)
收获指数
Harvest index
(%)
公顷穗数
Number of spikes per hectare (×104)
穗粒数
Number of grains per spike
千粒重
1000-weight (g)
2018—2019 CWF 7536a 15574a 48.4b 542b 30a 46.7b
CWR 7687a 16136a 48.9ab 586a 28a 48.0ab
GWR 7892a 16078a 50.8ab 571a 29a 48.7 a
BWR 7440a 15387a 51.3a 481c 29a 49.6 a
2019—2020 CWF 10198bc 15444b 67.6a 629d 32a 46.4a
CWR 11360a 17915 a 66.7a 871a 29b 45.0a
GWR 9972c 14358 c 68.3a 794c 27b 44.3a
BWR 10782ab 15779 b 67.0a 835b 26b 44.9a
平均Mean CWF 8867b 15509b 58.0a 586c 31a 46.5a
CWR 9524a 17025a 57.8a 728a 29b 46.5a
GWR 8932b 15218b 59.5a 682b 28b 46.5a
BWR 9111b 15583b 59.2a 657b 28b 47.2a

Fig. 2

Effects of different treatments on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulations of wheat grains and aboveground parts (two-year average) Different lowercase letters in the figure indicate that the differences among the nutrient accumulations of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in grains, over ground parts of wheat under different treatments are significant (P<0.05)"

Table 4

Soil available nutrient content of 0-20 cm at the early sowing and harvest stage of wheat"

时期
Period
处理
Treatment
2018—2019 2019—2020
硝态氮
Nitrate
nitrogen
(mg·kg-1)
速效磷
Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1)
速效钾
Available potassium (mg·kg-1)
硝态氮
Nitrate
nitrogen
(mg·kg-1)
速效磷
Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1)
速效钾
Available potassium (mg·kg-1)
播前
Sowing
CWF 12.97ab 12.10b 133.0a 14.61a 27.07a 163.6ab
CWR 15.13a 18.23a 136.4a 10.57b 24.02ab 161.0bc
GWR 14.51a 14.50ab 141.4a 9.12b 17.3b 156.7c
BWR 9.25b 16.99ab 123.5a 5.89c 22.08ab 169.6a
收获
Harvest
CWF 7.22c 10.19a 109.2bc 6.73b 24.01a 143.2ab
CWR 11.78ab 9.71a 123.5ab 9.61a 23.53a 163.2a
GWR 12.44a 10.17a 99.96c 8.69ab 22.36a 144.2ab
BWR 9.95b 12.00a 138.9a 8.86ab 19.83a 137.5b

Table 5

Balance sheet of seasonal nutrient input and output in wheat"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
投入
Input (kg·hm-2)
产出
Output (kg·hm-2)
平衡值
Equilibrium value (kg·hm-2)
盈余率
Surplus rate (%)
N P2O5 K2O N P2O5 K2O N P2O5 K2O N P2O5 K2O
2018—2019 CWF 344.0 194.6 98.3 195.8b 78.18 c 45.2a 148.2ab 116.4a 53.1c 75.9a 149.0a 117.7c
CWR 354.3 128.4 182.8 218.6ab 83.5bc 44.5a 135.7b 44.9c 138.3a 62.5a 53.7c 310.8a
GWR 390.1 160.7 132.1 221.9a 90.6a 45.0a 168.2a 70.0b 87.1b 76.1a 77.2b 193.4b
BWR 249.6 119.4 63.0 215.0ab 85.2ab 45.1a 34.5c 34.3d 17.9d 16.3b 40.2d 39.6d
2019—2020 CWF 321.2 195.6 90.4 265.4a 89.0b 50.5a 55.9b 106.6a 40.0b 21.1b 120.2a 79.9 b
CWR 305.9 122.9 117.9 277.1a 100.0a 51.4a 28.8c 23.0c 66.5a 10.6c 23.4c 130.2a
GWR 317.3 134.2 85.3 243.0b 86.4b 44.3b 74.3a 47.8b 41.1b 30.6a 55.3b 94.2 b
BWR 252.7 113.5 60.9 266.9a 106.6a 49.1a -14.2d 6.9d 11.8c -5.3d 6.5d 24.0c
2018—2020 CWF 665.2 390.2 188.7 461.2b 167.2c 95.6a 204.1b 223.0a 93.1c 44.3b 133.4a 97.3c
CWR 660.1 251.3 300.7 495.6a 183.5ab 95.9a 164.5c 67.8c 204.8a 33.2c 37.0c 213.4a
GWR 707.4 294.9 217.5 464.9b 177.1bc 89.3a 242.6a 117.8b 128.2b 52.2a 66.5b 143.5b
BWR 502.3 232.9 123.8 481.9ab 191.7a 94.2a 20.4d 41.2d 29.6d 4.2d 21.5d 31.4d

Table 6

Economic Benefit Analysis Table of each treatment (yuan/hm2)"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
肥料
Fertilizer
种子
Seed
机械
Mechanics
其他费用
other expenses
总成本
Total cost
总收益
Total revenue
净收益
Net profit
2018—2019 CWF 3552 1650 4781 9053 19036 26415 7380ab
CWR 3563 1650 4781 9053 19047 29142 10095a
GWR 1851 2100 4931 6578 15460 17362 1902c
BWR 1851 2100 4931 6578 15460 20368 4908bc
2019—2020 CWF 3552 1650 4781 9053 19036 28328 9292c
CWR 3452 1650 4781 9053 18936 31446 12510b
GWR 1851 2100 4931 6578 15460 21939 6479d
BWR 1851 1500 4931 6578 14860 33302 18442a
平均 Mean CWF 3552 1650 4781 9053 19036 27372 8336b
CWR 3508 1650 4781 9053 18992 30294 11302a
GWR 1851 2100 4931 6578 15460 19651 4191c
BWR 1851 1800 4931 6578 15160 26835 11675a
[1] 刘妍妮. 陕西省粮食播种面积及其产量动态与预测. 江西农业学报, 2018, 30(10): 142-146. doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2018.10.28.
doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2018.10.28
LIU Y N. Dynamics and prediction of grain sown area and yield in Shaanxi Province. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2018, 30(10): 142-146. doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2018.10.28. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2018.10.28
[2] 戴相林. 关中中西部地区农田土壤养分平衡状况演变研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2012.
DAI X L. Changes of nutrient balances in soil in Midwest region of Guanzhong plain[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[3] 王群, 王建, 张学林, 赵亚丽, 李潮海. 不同耕作模式下小麦玉米周年生产及土壤养分变化特征. 河南农业大学学报, 2015, 49(4): 429-437. doi: 10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2015.04.001.
doi: 10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2015.04.001
WANG Q, WANG J, ZHANG X L, ZHAO Y L, LI C H. Change characteristics of wheat and maize anniversary production and soil nutrient content under different rotation tillage patterns. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2015, 49(4): 429-437. doi: 10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2015.04.001. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2015.04.001
[4] 李露, 杨玲, 廖允成, 温晓霞. 黄土高原半湿润区旱地一年两熟复种模式土壤水分效应. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010, 28(4): 145-151.
LI L, YANG L, LIAO Y C, WEN X X. Study on soil moisture effect of double cropping in the dryland of subhumid areas of the Loess Plateau. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2010, 28(4): 145-151. (in Chinese)
[5] 于亚莉, 史东梅, 蒋平. 不同土壤管理措施对坡耕地土壤氮磷养分流失的控制效应. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1): 30-36, 42. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.006.
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.006
YU Y L, SHI D M, JIANG P. Effect of different soil management measures on controlling soil nitrogen and phosphorus loss from slop farmland. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(1): 30-36, 42. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.006. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.006
[6] 邵云, 李昊烊, 翁正鹏, 王璐, 李斯斯, 刘晴. 不同茬口对小麦养分利用和产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(3): 356-363.
SHAO Y, LI H Y, WENG Z P, WANG L, LI S S, LIU Q. Effects of different previous crops on nutrient utilization and yield of wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39(3): 356-363. (in Chinese)
[7] SANTACHIARA G, SALVAGIOTTI F, ROTUNDO J L. Nutritional and environmental effects on biological nitrogen fixation in soybean: a meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 2019, 240: 106-115. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.05.006.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.05.006
[8] 乔俊, 颜廷梅, 薛峰, 杨林章, 卢萍. 太湖地区稻田不同轮作制度下的氮肥减量研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(1): 24-31.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00024
QIAO J, YAN T M, XUE F, YANG L Z, LU P. Reduction of nitrogen fertilizer application under different crop rotation systems in paddy fields of Taihu Area. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2011, 19(1): 24-31. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00024
[9] HUANG M B, SHAO M G, ZHANG L, LI Y S. Water use efficiency and sustainability of different long-term crop rotation systems in the Loess Plateau of China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2003, 72(1): 95-104. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00065-5.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00065-5
[10] 曹寒冰, 王朝辉, 师渊超, 杜明叶, 雷小青, 张文忠, 张璐, 蒲岳建. 渭北旱地冬小麦监控施氮技术的优化. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(19): 3826-3838.
CAO H B, WANG Z H, SHI Y C, DU M Y, LEI X Q, ZHANG W Z, ZHANG L, PU Y J. Optimization of nitrogen fertilizer recommendation technology based on soil test for winter wheat on Weibei dryland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(19): 3826-3838. (in Chinese)
[11] 章孜亮, 刘金山, 王朝辉, 赵护兵, 杨宁, 杨荣, 曹寒冰. 基于土壤氮素平衡的旱地冬小麦监控施氮. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(6): 1387-1396.
ZHANG Z L, LIU J S, WANG Z H, ZHAO H B, YANG N, YANG R, CAO H B. Nitrogen recommendation for dryland winter wheat by monitoring nitrate in 1 m soil and based on nitrogen balance. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(6): 1387-1396. (in Chinese)
[12] 黄明. 基于收获期土壤测试和施肥位置优化的旱地小麦减肥增效研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
HUANG M. Optimized fertilization for cutting down fertilizers and increasing efficiency of wheat production based on soil test at harvest and regulating fertilizer placement in dryland[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[13] 中华人民共和国农业农村部.农业农村部办公厅关于推介发布2018年农业主推技术的通知. 北京: 农办科(2018) 12号, 2018年5月4日发布.
The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China. Notice of the General Office of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs on the promotion and release of the main agricultural technologies in 2018. Beijing: Agriculture Office [2018] No. 12, issued on May 4, 2018. (in Chinese)
[14] 黄倩楠, 王朝辉, 黄婷苗, 侯赛宾, 张翔, 马清霞, 张欣欣. 中国主要麦区农户小麦氮磷钾养分需求与产量的关系. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(14): 2722-2734.
HUANG Q N, WANG Z H, HUANG T M, HOU S B, ZHANG X, MA Q X, ZHANG X X. Relationships of N, P and K requirement to wheat grain yield of farmers in major wheat production regions of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(14): 2722-2734. (in Chinese)
[15] 黄倩楠, 党海燕, 黄婷苗, 侯赛宾, 王朝辉. 我国主要麦区农户施肥评价及减肥潜力分析. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(23): 4816-4834.
HUANG Q N, DANG H Y, HUANG T M, HOU S B, WANG Z H. Evaluation of farmers' fertilizer application and fertilizer reduction potentials in major wheat production regions of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4816-4834. (in Chinese)
[16] 袁家富, 徐祥玉, 赵书军, 彭成林, 熊又升, 曹卫东, 鲁剑巍. 绿肥翻压和减氮对烤烟养分累积、产量及质量的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2009, 48(9): 2106-2109.
YUAN J F, XU X Y, ZHAO S J, PENG C L, XIONG Y S, CAO W D, LU J W. Effect of green manure and nitrogen level on nutrient accumulation, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 48(9): 2106-2109. (in Chinese)
[17] 王瑞宝, 闫芳芳, 夏开宝, 殷寿安, 李祖红, 张瑞勤, 杨冀, 强继业, 杨虹. 不同苕子绿肥翻压模式对烤烟产量和品质的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(12): 6183-6188. doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2010.12.106.
doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2010.12.106
WANG R B, YAN F F, XIA K B, YIN S A, LI Z H, ZHANG R Q, YANG J, QIANG J Y, YANG H. Effects of different model of common vetch green manure turning under on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(12): 6183-6188. doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2010.12.106. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2010.12.106
[18] 黄平娜, 秦道珠, 龙怀玉, 尹三宝, 张认连, 雷秋良, 杨全柳. 绿肥还田对烟田土壤培肥和烤烟产量品质的作用. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(2): 379-382. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.02.024.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.02.024
HUANG P N, QIN D Z, LONG H Y, YIN S B, ZHANG R L, LEI Q L, YANG Q L. Effect of green manure return to field on soil fertility of tobacco fields and the yield and quality of tobacco. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41(2): 379-382. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.02.024. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.02.024
[19] 郭云周, 尹小怀, 王劲松, 雷素芬, 戴茨华, 温三明, 杜东英, 刘建香. 翻压等量绿肥和化肥减量对红壤旱地烤烟产量产值的影响. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 25(6): 811-816. doi: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390x(n).2010.06.013.
doi: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390x(n).2010.06.013
GUO Y Z, YIN X H, WANG J S, LEI S F, DAI C H, WEN S M, DU D Y, LIU J X. Effects of equal quantity green manure application and different fertilizer rates on yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco in red soil of upland in Yunnan. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2010, 25(6): 811-816. doi: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390x(n).2010.06.013. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390x(n).2010.06.013
[20] 李昊烊. 华北平原南部两熟区不同种植模式周年养分利用效率及土壤肥力质量评价[D]. 新乡: 河南师范大学, 2018.
LI H Y. Evaluation of nutrient utilization efficiency and soil fertility quality in different planting patterns of double-cropping region in southern part of North China plain[D]. Xinxiang: Henan Normal University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[21] 付蓉. 春油菜区绿肥替代氮肥的效应及潜力研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2020.
FU R. Effects and potential of nitrogen fertilizer replacement by green manure in spring rapeseed area[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[22] 靖华, 崔欢虎, 王裕智, 马爱平, 亢秀丽. 茬口和施氮水平对不同基因型小麦产量及产量结构的影响. 陕西农业科学, 2007, 53(4): 3-5, 42.
JING H, CUI H H, WANG Y Z, MA A P, KANG X L. Effects of stubble and nitrogen application level on yield and yield structure of wheat with different genotypes. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 53(4): 3-5, 42. (in Chinese)
[23] 张达斌. 黄土高原地区种植豆科绿肥协调土壤水分和氮素供应的效应及机理[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2016.
ZHANG D B. Effects of leguminous green manure on soil water and nitrogen supply and its mechanism in the loess plateau[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2016. (in Chinese)
[24] 王蓉芳, 黄德明, 崔勇. 我国不同地区土壤肥力监测报告(1988-1997)一东北区土壤肥力变化趋势及原因分析. 土壤肥料, 2000(6): 8-13.
WANG R F, HUANG D M, CUI Y. The report of soil fertility monitoring in different areas of China(1988-1997). Soils and Fertilizers, 2000(6): 8-13. (in Chinese)
[25] SINGH A, CARSKY R J, LUCAS E O, DASHIELL K. Soil N balance as affected by soybean maturity class in the Guinea savanna of Nigeria. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2003, 100(2/3): 231-240. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00193-2.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00193-2
[26] 杨宁, 赵护兵, 王朝辉, 张达斌, 高亚军. 豆科作物-小麦轮作方式下旱地小麦花后干物质及养分累积、转移与产量的关系. 生态学报, 2012, 32(15): 4827-4835. doi: 10.5846/stxb201107221085.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201107221085
YANG N, ZHAO H B, WANG Z H, ZHANG D B, GAO Y J. Accumulation and translocation of dry matter and nutrients of wheat rotated with legumes and its relation to grain yield in a dryland area. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 32(15): 4827-4835. doi: 10.5846/stxb201107221085. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201107221085
[27] ZHANG D, YAO P, NA Z, CAO W, ZHANG S, LI Y, GAO Y. Soil water balance and water use efficiency of dryland wheat in different precipitation years in response to green manure approach. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 26856. doi: 10.1038/srep26856.
doi: 10.1038/srep26856
[28] 摄晓燕, 谢永生, 郝明德, 赵云英, 张义, 鞠艳. 黄土旱塬长期施肥对小麦产量及养分平衡的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(6): 27-32.
SHE X Y, XIE Y S, HAO M D, ZHAO Y Y, ZHANG Y, JU Y. Effect of long-term fertilization on wheat yield and nutrient balance in dryland of the Loess Plateau. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2009, 27(6): 27-32. (in Chinese)
[29] 李继福, 鲁剑巍, 任涛, 丛日环, 李小坤, 周鹂, 杨文兵, 戴志刚. 稻田不同供钾能力条件下秸秆还田替代钾肥效果. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(2): 292-302.
LI J F, LU J W, REN T, CONG R H, LI X K, ZHOU L, YANG W B, DAI Z G. Effect of straw incorporation substitute for K-fertilizer under different paddy soil K supply capacities. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(2): 292-302. (in Chinese)
[30] 张鹏. 关中西部灌区冬小麦合理施肥技术研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2010.
ZHANG P. Study on balance fertilization in irrigation area of western Guanzhong plain[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2010. (in Chinese)
[31] 秦雪超, 潘君廷, 郭树芳, 翟丽梅, 王洪媛, 武淑霞, 刘宏斌. 化肥减量替代对华北平原小麦-玉米轮作产量及氮流失影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(7): 1558-1567.
QIN X C, PAN J T, GUO S F, ZHAI L M, WANG H Y, WU S X, LIU H B. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with biogas fertilizer on crop yield of wheat-maize rotation and soil nitrogen loss in North China Plain. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(7): 1558-1567. (in Chinese)
[32] 杨琳. 不同耕作方式下冬小麦-夏作物复种模式的相关研究[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2017.
YANG L. Study on multiple cropping patterns of winter wheat and summer crops under different tillage methods[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[33] 彭云, 赵正雄, 李忠环, 董艳, 陈荣平, 王胱霖, 王永, 杨自控. 不同前茬对烤烟生长、产量和质量的影响. 作物学报, 2010, 36(2): 335-340.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00335
PENG Y, ZHAO Z X, LI Z H, DONG Y, CHEN R P, WANG G L, WANG Y, YANG Z K. Effects of different preceding crops on growth, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco plant. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(2): 335-340. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00335
[34] 惠言. 华北平原以豆科为基础的轮作方式对农作物产量和土壤理化性质的影响[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2017.
HUI Y. Crop yields and soil physiochemical properties in response to legume-based cropping rotation in North China plain[D]. Kaifeng: Henan University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[35] LENSSEN A W, JOHNSON G D, CARLSON G R. Cropping sequence and tillage system influences annual crop production and water use in semiarid Montana, USA. Field Crops Research, 2007, 100(1): 32-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.05.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.05.004
[36] ZHANG M K, FANG L P. Effect of tillage, fertilizer and green manure cropping on soil quality at an abandoned brick making site. Soil and Tillage Research, 2007, 93(1): 87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2006.03.016.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2006.03.016
[37] 李可懿, 王朝辉, 赵护兵, 赵娜, 高亚军, LYONS G. 黄土高原旱地小麦与豆科绿肥轮作及施氮对小麦产量和籽粒养分的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(2): 110-116, 123.
LI K Y, WANG Z H, ZHAO H B, ZHAO N, GAO Y J, LYONS G. Effect of rotation with legumes and N fertilization on yield and grain nutrient contents of wheat in dryland of the Loess Plateau. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(2): 110-116, 123. (in Chinese)
[38] DANGA B O, OUMA J P, WAKINDIKI I I C, BAR-TAL A. Chapter 5 legume-wheat rotation effects on residual soil moisture, nitrogen and wheat yield in tropical regions. Advances in Agronomy, 2009, 101: 315-349. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00805-5.
doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00805-5
[39] MARTINIELLO P. Cereal-forage rotations effect on biochemical characteristics of topsoil and productivity of the crops in Mediterranean environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 2011, 35(4): 193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2011.06.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2011.06.002
[40] TIAN G, BADEJO M A, OKOH A I, ISHIDA F, KOLAWOLE G O, HAYASHI Y, SALAKO F K. Effects of residue quality and climate on plant residue decomposition and nutrient release along the transect from humid forest to Sahel of West Africa. Biogeochemistry, 2007, 86(2): 217-229. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9158-3.
doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9158-3
[41] 许广领. 麦秸还田配施氮肥对增加土壤有机质和提高夏大豆产量的效应. 江苏农业科学, 1997, 25(1): 49-51.
XU G L. Effects of wheat straw returning combined with nitrogen fertilizer on increasing soil organic matter and increasing summer soybean yield. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 1997, 25(1): 49-51. (in Chinese)
[42] 杨云马, 孙彦铭, 贾良良, 黄少辉, 杨军芳, 迟吉娜.解决还田秸秆腐解争氮的秸秆处理方法: CN201710182526.X. 2017-06-30 [2021-3-1].
YANG Y M, SUN Y M, JIA L L, HUANG S H, YANG J F, CHI J N. The straw treatment method to solve the decomposition of straw returning to the field for nitrogen: CN201710182526.X. 2017-06-30 [2021-3-1]. (in Chinese)
[43] 孙斌, 曹雯梅, 王应君, 王喜枝, 斐瑞杰, 晁建立, 王立秋, 刘松涛, 王立河. 不同土壤钾素对强筋小麦产量形成因子的影响. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(16): 146-149.
SUN B, CAO W M, WANG Y J, WANG X Z, PEI R J, CHAO J L, WANG L Q, LIU S T, WANG L H. Effects of potassium in the different soil types on the factors of yields formation of the strong gluten flour wheat. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(16): 146-149. (in Chinese)
[44] 王伟, 孙帼妹, 李荣, 廖文强, 郭九信, 冯绪猛, 郭世伟. 枸溶性钾肥在盆栽稻麦轮作条件下的肥效研究. 南京农业大学学报, 2014, 37(6): 75-82.
WANG W, SUN G M, LI R, LIAO W Q, GUO J X, FENG X M, GUO S W. Study on the effects of citrate acid-soluble potassium fertilizer in rice-wheat rotation system by pot experiment. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2014, 37(6): 75-82. (in Chinese)
[45] 黄婷苗, 郑险峰, 王朝辉. 还田玉米秸秆氮释放对关中黄土供氮和冬小麦氮吸收的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(14): 2785-2795.
HUANG T M, ZHENG X F, WANG Z H. Nitrogen release of returned maize straw and its effects on loess N supply and nitrogen uptake by winter wheat in Guanzhong plain. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(14): 2785-2795. (in Chinese)
[46] 葛玮健, 常艳丽, 刘俊梅, 张树兰, 孙本华, 杨学云. 塿土区长期施肥对小麦-玉米轮作体系钾素平衡与钾库容量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(3): 629-636.
GE W J, CHANG Y L, LIU J M, ZHANG S L, SUN B H, YANG X Y. Potassium balance and pool as influenced by long-term fertilization under continuous winter wheat-summer maize cropping system in a manural loess soil. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(3): 629-636. (in Chinese)
[47] 苏成国, 尹斌, 朱兆良, 沈其荣. 农田氮素的气态损失与大气氮湿沉降及其环境效应. 土壤, 2005, 37(2): 113-120.
SU C G, YIN B, ZHU Z L, SHEN Q R. Gaseous loss of nitrogen from fields and wet deposition of atmospheric nitrogen and their environmental effects. Soils, 2005, 37(2): 113-120. (in Chinese)
[48] 王秀斌. 优化施氮下冬小麦/夏玉米轮作农田氮素循环与平衡研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2009.
WANG X B. Nitrogen cycling and balance in winter wheat-summer corn rotation system under optimized nitrogen management[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2009. (in Chinese)
[49] 郭鑫年, 孙娇, 梁锦绣, 周涛, 田旭东, 陈刚. 栽培方式与施磷量对水稻养分累积、分配及磷素平衡的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(4): 104-111.
GUO X N, SUN J, LIANG J X, ZHOU T, TIAN X D, CHEN G. Cultivation way and phosphorus fertilizer on rice nutrient accumulation, distribution and soil phosphorus balance. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017(4): 104-111. (in Chinese)
[50] HARDARSON G. 植物基因型和氮肥对栽培大豆共生固氮的影响. 李淑娴, 译. 核农学通报, 1986(2): 42-44.
HARDARSON G. Effects of plant genotype and nitrogen fertilizer on symbiotic nitrogen fixation in cultivated soybean. LI S X, translate. Bulletin of Nuclear Agronomy, 1986(2): 42-44. (in Chinese)
[51] LABERGE G, HAUSSMANN B, AMBUS P, HØGH-JENSEN H. Cowpea N rhizodeposition and its below-ground transfer to a co-existing and to a subsequent millet crop on a sandy soil of the Sudano-Sahelian eco-zone. Plant and Soil, 2011, 340(1/2): 369-382. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0609-6.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0609-6
[52] 谭德水, 江丽华, 谭淑樱, 徐钰, 郑福丽, 李国生, 刘兆辉. 湖区小麦-玉米轮作模式下不同施肥措施调控氮磷养分流失研究. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(1): 128-137.
TAN D S, JIANG L H, TAN S Y, XU Y, ZHENG F L, LI G S, LIU Z H. Effects of fertilization controlling nitrogen and phosphorus loss from farmland under wheat-maize rotation in nansi lake region. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(1): 128-137. (in Chinese)
[53] 赵忠, 佟立杰, 刘向阳. 怎样预防小麦倒伏. 农家参谋, 2007(9): 10.
ZHAO Z, TONG L J, LIU X Y. How to prevent wheat lodging. The Farmers Consultant, 2007(9): 10. (in Chinese)
[54] 董秀春, 韩伟, 杨洪宾. 倒伏对冬小麦病害发生情况和产量的影响. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(4): 27-30. doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2016.04.006.
doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2016.04.006
DONG X C, HAN W, YANG H B. Effects of lodging on winter wheat diseases occurrence and yield. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 45(4): 27-30. doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2016.04.006. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2016.04.006
[55] 李淑鹏, 郭群鹏. 小麦倒伏原因与预防措施. 种子科技, 2010, 28(1): 49.
LI S P, GUO Q P. Lodging reasons and preventive measures of wheat. Seed Science & Technology, 2010, 28(1): 49. (in Chinese)
[56] 徐佰彪. 单季低氮投入条件下周年麦豆、麦玉氮肥运筹及利用差异[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2020.
XU B B. Nitrogen fertilizer operation and utilization difference of annual soybean-wheat and maize-wheat under low nitrogen input of single season[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[57] 刘海涛, 陈一兵, 田静, 林超文. 成都平原不同种植模式下重金属镉污染风险和经济效益评价. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(2): 184-191. doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2018.0164.
doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2018.0164
LIU H T, CHEN Y B, TIAN J, LIN C W. Evaluation of economic benefits and cadmium pollution risk in different cropping system in Chengdu Plain, China. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2019, 36(2): 184-191. doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2018.0164. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2018.0164
[58] 徐英. 大豆病虫草害发生规律及综合防治技术. 农业工程技术, 2018, 38(5): 25-26. doi: 10.16815/j.cnki.11-5436/s.2018.05.020.
doi: 10.16815/j.cnki.11-5436/s.2018.05.020
XU Y. Occurrence regularity and integrated control technology of soybean diseases, insect pests and weeds. Agricultural Engineering Technology, 2018, 38(5): 25-26. doi: 10.16815/j.cnki.11-5436/s.2018.05.020. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16815/j.cnki.11-5436/s.2018.05.020
[59] 王敬国, 林杉, 李保国. 氮循环与中国农业氮管理. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(3): 503-517.
WANG J G, LIN S, LI B G. Nitrogen cycling and management strategies in Chinese agriculture. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(3): 503-517. (in Chinese)
[60] 刘巽浩, 王爱玲, 高旺盛. 实行作物秸秆还田促进农业可持续发展. 作物杂志, 1998(5): 2-6.
LIU X H, WANG A L, GAO W S. Returning crop straw to field promotes agricultural sustainable development. Crops, 1998(5): 2-6. (in Chinese)
[1] LIU GaoYuan, HE AiLing, DU Jun, LÜ JinLing, NIE ShengWei, PAN XiuYan, XU JiDong, LI Jue, YANG ZhanPing. Effect of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Nitrous Oxide Emission from Wheat-Maize Rotation System in Lime Concretion Black Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(16): 3156-3167.
[2] LIU ShuJun, LI DongChu, HUANG Jing, QU XiaoLin, MA ChangBao, WANG HuiYing, YU ZiKun, ZHANG Lu, HAN TianFu, LIU KaiLou, SHEN Zhe, ZHANG HuiMin. Spatial-Temporal Variation Characteristics of Wheat and Maize Stalk Resources and Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Potential of Returning to Farmland in Recent 30 Years in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(16): 3140-3155.
[3] WU JinZhi, HUANG XiuLi, HOU YuanQuan, TIAN WenZhong, LI JunHong, ZHANG Jie, LI Fang, LÜ JunJie, YAO YuQing, FU GuoZhan, HUANG Ming, LI YouJun. Effects of Ridge and Furrow Planting Patterns on Crop Productivity and Soil Nitrate-N Accumulation in Dryland Summer Maize and Winter Wheat Rotation System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(11): 2078-2091.
[4] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[5] ZHANG XinYao,ZHANG Min,ZHU YuanPeng,HUI XiaoLi,CHAI RuShan,GAO HongJian,LUO LaiChao. Effects of Reduced Phosphorus Application on Crop Yield and Grain Nutritional Quality in the Rice-Wheat Rotation System in Chaohu Lake Basin [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3791-3806.
[6] WANG QiaoJuan,HE Hong,LI Liang,ZHANG Chao,CAI HuanJie. Research on Soybean Irrigation Schedule Based on AquaCrop Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3365-3379.
[7] MAO AnRan,ZHAO HuBing,YANG HuiMin,WANG Tao,CHEN XiuWen,LIANG WenJuan. Effects of Different Mulching Periods and Mulching Practices on Economic Return and Environment [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(3): 608-618.
[8] MI XiaoTian,SHI Lei,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Fertilizer Reduction Potential and Economic Benefits of Crop Production for Smallholder Farmers in Shaanxi Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4370-4384.
[9] MA Yue,TIAN Yi,YUAN AiJing,WANG HaoLin,LI YongHua,HUANG TingMiao,HUANG Ning,LI Chao,DANG HaiYan,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui,SHI Mei. Response of Wheat Yield and Protein Concentration to Soil Nitrate in Northern Wheat Production Region of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3903-3918.
[10] MA HongMei,CAO HanBing,XIE YingHe,LI TingLiang,LIU Kai,ZHANG QiRu,JIANG LiWei,CAO Jing,SHAO JingLin,WU WenYue,LI WenQi. Evaluation on Fertilizer Application and Its Economic-Environmental Benefits Associated with Fertilizer Reduction Potential for Dryland Wheat in Loess Plateau of Southern Shanxi Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2804-2817.
[11] LI HanTing,CHAI Qiang,WANG QiMing,HU FaLong,YU AiZhong,ZHAO Cai,YIN Wen,FAN ZhiLong,FAN Hong. Water Use Characteristics of Maize-Green Manure Intercropping Under Different Nitrogen Application Levels in the Oasis Irrigation Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12): 2608-2618.
[12] LI TingLiang,WANG YuFeng,WANG JiaHao,LI Li,XIE JunYu,LI LiNa,HUANG XiaoLei,XIE YingHe. Nutrient Resource Quantity from Main Grain Crop Straw Incorporation and Its Enlightenment on Chemical Fertilizer Reduction in Wheat Production in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4835-4854.
[13] HUANG QianNan,DANG HaiYan,HUANG TingMiao,HOU SaiBin,WANG ZhaoHui. Evaluation of Farmers’ Fertilizer Application and Fertilizer Reduction Potentials in Major Wheat Production Regions of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4816-4834.
[14] ZHANG XinXin,SHI Lei,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Potential of Fertilizer Reduction and Benefits of Environment and Economic for Cereal Crops Production in Shaanxi Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(19): 4010-4023.
[15] DING YiBo,XU JiaTun,LI Liang,CAI HuanJie,SUN YaNan. Analysis of Drought Characteristics and Its Trend Change in Shaanxi Province Based on SPEI and MI [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23): 4296-4308.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!