Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 662-674.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.04.006

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Modeling the Effects of Post-Anthesis Waterlogging Stress Under Different Fertilizer Levels on Rapeseed Yield and Its Formation

SONG ChuWei1,2, CAO HongXin2, ZHANG WenYu2, ZHANG WeiXin2, CHEN WeiTao2FENG ChunHuan2, GE SiJun2   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014; 2Institute of Agricultural Information, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Engineering Research Center for Digital Agriculture, Nanjing 210014
  • Received:2017-06-21 Online:2018-02-16 Published:2018-02-16

Abstract: 【Objective】Water-logging is one of the main meteorological disasters in rapeseed production areas in the Yangze River valley. This study aimed at quantifying the effects of waterlogging at anthesis stage under different fertilizer levels on rapeseed grain yield and yield components, which could provide scientific basis for waterlogging stress assessment, forecasting, and early warning in rapeseed production. 【Method】 The experiments in two-growing season were conducted during 2014-2016 with different waterlogging durations at anthesis stage under different nitrogen levels at Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Using two rapeseed cultivars (Ningyou 18, and Ningza 19) as experimental materials, the treatments were waterlogging at anthesis stage of 0, 3, 6, and 9 days in pot, and 0, 3, and 6 days in pool under different fertilization conditions, including N1 (N 0.018 kg·m-2, P2O5 0.012 kg·m-2, K2O 0.018 kg·m-2, and borax 0.0015 kg·m-2), and N0 (N 0 kg·m-2). 【Result】The results of this study showed that: (1) The yield per plant and pods per plant for Ningyou 18 and Ningza 19 under pot experiment without fertilizer significantly decreased after 3 days waterlogging at anthesis, but the 1000-grain weight, and the grain number per pod significantly decreased after 6 days or 9 days waterlogging at anthesis; the responses of the yield per plant and pods per plant for Ningyou 18 and Ningza 19 under pot experiment with fertilizer to waterlogging at anthesis existed obvious differences, i.e., the yield per plant for Ningyou 18 significantly decreased after 3 days waterlogging at anthesis, while Ningza 19’s significantly decreased after 6 days waterlogging at anthesis. The yield per plant for Ningyou 18 under pool experiment without fertilizer significantly decreased after 6 days waterlogging at anthesis, but which of Ningza 19 decreased after 3 days waterlogging at anthesis; the yield per plant for Ningyou 18, and Ningza 19 under pool experiment with fertilizer significantly decreased after 6 days waterlogging at anthesis. The dry matter weight, grain yield, and harvest index (HI) of the aboveground of rapeseed were decreased with the increase of waterlogging duration. There were no significant differences in dry matter weight of aboveground, and yield components under 3 days of waterlogging treatments, but the yield decreased significantly. Under the condition of 6 days of waterlogging treatment, the aboveground dry weight, yield, and yield components all decreased significantly. (2) In accordance with mixed linear model analysis, with each 1 d increasing of waterlogging days at flowering time, the HI decreased at 0.008, the number of pods per plant decreased at 14.71, the grain number per pod decreased at 0.29, the 1000-grain weight decreased at 0.04 g, and the yield per plant reduced at 1.52 g/plant. The interaction between waterlogging and fertilization could significantly increase the yield of 3.17 g/plant, and the number of pods per plant of 39.16, which could alleviate the effects of waterlogging on yield. When the waterlogging was up to 6 days, the interaction between waterlogging and fertilization could reduce the yield of 2.29 g/plant, but it did not reach the significant with P<0.05, so which had no significant effect on the yield components. When the waterlogging was up to 9 days, the interaction between waterlogging and fertilization could significantly reduce the yield of 4.78 g/plant, i.e., it could increase the yield loss.【Conclusion】We concluded that the waterlogging stress at anthesis stage reduced the rapeseed grain yield and yield components, and the reduction was strengthened with the waterlogging duration expand. The pod number per plant was more sensitive to waterlogging stress than the grain number per pod and 1000-grain weight, the responses of Ningyou 18 for waterlogging were more sensitive than Ningza 19, and the responses of pot cultivation for waterlogging were more sensitive than pool cultivation. According to the model analysis in this study, the negative effects of waterlogging at anthesis within short duration on the yield, HI, and number of pods per plant can be alleviated by fertilizing, the alleviation role can be weakened with waterlogging duration expand, and the effects of 9 days of waterlogging at anthesis on the yield, HI, and number of pods per plant for no fertilizer and fertilizer treatments can be arrived to uniformity; With each 1 d increasing of waterlogging at flowering period, the HI decreased, the number of pods per plant, the grain number per pod, the 1000-grain weight, and the yield per plant all reduced obviously, the harm of 3 days of waterlogging on rapeseed under fertilizer condition was small, while under 6 days, and 9 days of waterlogging conditions, the weaken effects of fertilizer on waterlogging at anthesis can be reduced. Under normal water management, the application of fertilizer could significantly increase the yield and yield components, however, with the prolongation of waterlogging duration, the effects of fertilizer for alleviating the impact of waterlogging on the yield was declining.

Key words: rapeseed, fertilizer, waterlogging, flowering, yield, yield components, quantization

[1]    http://www.fao.org/ 2015.
[2]    SETTER T, WATERS I, SHARMA S, SINGH K, KULSHRESHTHA N, YADUVANSHI N, RAM P, SINGH B, RANE J, MCDONALD G. Review of wheat improvement for waterlogging tolerance in Australia and India: The importance of anaerobiosis and element toxicities associated with different soils. Annals of Botany, 2009, 103(2): 221-235.
[3]    TENNANT D, SCHOLZ G, DIXON J, PURDIE B. Physical and chemical characteristics of duplex soils and their distribution in the south-west of western Australia. Animal Production Science, 1992, 32(7): 827-843.
[4]    CANNELL R Q, BELFORD R K. Effects of waterlogging at different stages of development on the growth and yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1980, 31(9): 963-965.
[5]    ZHOU W, LIN X. Effects of waterlogging at different growth stages on physiological characteristics and seed yield of winter rape (Brassica napus L.). Field Crops Research, 1995, 44 (2/3): 103-110.
[6]    SHAW R E, MEYER W S, MCNEILL A, TYERMAN S D. Waterlogging in Australian agricultural landscapes: A review of plant responses and crop models. Crop and Pasture Science, 2013, 64(6): 549-562.
[7]    国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴2013. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2014.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook(2013). Beijing: China Statistical Press, 2014. (in Chinese)
[8]    李玲, 张春雷, 张树杰, 李光明. 渍水对冬油菜苗期生长及生理的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2011, 33 (3): 247-252.
LI L, ZHANG C L, ZHANG S J, LI G M. Effects of waterlogging on growth and physiological changes of winter rapeseed seedling (Brassicanapus L.). Chinese Journal of Oilcrop Sciences, 2011, 33(3): 247-252. (in Chinese)
[9]    BALAKHNINA T, BENNICELLI R, ST?PNIEWSKA Z, ST?PNIEWSKI W, BORKOWSKA A, FOMINA I. Stress responses of spring rape plants to soil flooding. International Agrophysics, 2012, 26(4): 347-353.
[10]   ZHANG H, TURNER N C, POOLE M L. Yield of wheat and canola in the high rainfall zone of south-western Australia in years with and without a transient perched water table. Crop and Pasture Science, 2004, 55(4): 461-470.
[11]   YU C B, XIE Y Y, HOU J J, FU Y Q, HONG S, XING L. Response of nitrate metabolism in seedlings of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) to low oxygen stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(11): 2416-2423.
[12]   LI H J, CHAI L, ZHANG J F, PU X B, JIANG J, CUI C, ZHANG X H, ZHENG B C, JIANG L C. Consistency of different indices in rapeseed (Brassica napus) may predict the waterlogging tolerance. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 2016, 18(1): 61-67.
[13]   ASHRAF M A. Waterlogging stress in plants: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2012, 7(13): 1976-1981.
[14]   张宇, 蒋跃林. 花期渍水胁迫对冬油菜生长及产量的影响. 农学学报, 2014, 4 (10): 24-27.
ZHANG Y, JIANG Y L. Influence of forced waterlogging during florescence on the growth and output of winterrape. Journal of Agriculture, 2014, 4(10): 24-27. (in Chinese)
[15]   宋丰萍, 胡立勇, 周广生, 吴江生, 傅廷栋. 渍水时间对油菜生长及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2010, 36 (1): 170-176.
SONG F P, HU L Y, ZHOU G S, WU J S, FU T D. Effects of waterlogging time on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) growth and yield. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(1): 170-176. (in Chinese)
[16]   邹小云, 刘宝林, 宋来强, 官春云. 花期渍水逆境下氮素对油菜产量及氮肥利用效率的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27 (4): 1169-1176.
ZOU X Y, LIU B L, SONG L Q, GUAN C Y. Effects of nitrogen application on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of rapeseed (Brassica napus) under waterlogging stress at flowering stage. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(4): 1169-1176. (in Chinese)
[17]   张文英, 朱建强, 郭显平, 程玲. 花果期持续受渍对油菜生长、产量与含油量的影响. 长江流域资源与环境, 2003, 12(2): 194-197.
ZHANG W Y, ZHU J Q, GUAO X P, CHENG L. Influence upon growing and yield and oiliness content of rape in flower-pod stage under different waterlogged stress. Resources and Environment in the Yangze Basin, 2003, 12(2): 194-197. (in Chinese)
[18]   朱建强, 程伦国, 吴立仁, 刘伟. 油菜持续受渍试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(z1): 63-67.
Zhu J Q, Cheng L G, Wu L R, Liu W. Experimental study on rape suffering from continuous subsurface waterlogging. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, 21(z1): 63-67. (in Chinese)
[19]   邹娟, 朱建强, 吴启侠, 戴兰燕, 李梦琴. 氮磷钾施用对薹花期受渍油菜产量及养分吸收的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(20): 4956-4959.
ZOU J, ZHU J Q, WU Q X, DAI L Y, LI M Q. Effects of water table during bud-blooming period on rapeseed yield and nutrient uptake. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 54(20): 4956-4959. (in Chinese)
[20]   Zhou W, Zhao D, Lin X. Effects of waterlogging on nitrogen accumulation and alleviation of waterlogging damage by application of nitrogen fertilizer and mixtalol in winter rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1997, 16(1): 47-53.
[21]   刘波, 魏全全, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤, 丛日环, 吴礼树, 徐维明, 杨运清, 任涛. 苗期渍水和氮肥用量对直播冬油菜产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(1): 144-153.
LIU B, WEI Q Q, LU J W, LI X K, CONG R H, WU L S, XU W M, YANG Y Q, REN T. Effects of waterlogging at the seedling stage and nitrogen application on seed yields and nitrogen use efficiency of direct-sown winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(1): 144-153. (in Chinese)
[22]   HABIBZADEH F, SOROOSHZADEH A, PIRDASHTI H, MODARRES-SANAVY S A M. Alleviation of waterlogging damage by foliar application of nitrogen compounds and tricyclazole in canola. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2013, 7(3): 401-406.
[23]   宋丰萍, 胡立勇, 周广生, 吴江生, 傅廷栋. 地下水位对油菜生长及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35 (8): 1508-1515.
SONG F P, HU L Y, ZHOU G S, WU J S, FU T D. Effects of water table on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) growth and yield. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(8): 1508-1515. (in Chinese)
[24]   曹宏鑫, 杨太明, 蒋跃林, 刘瑞娜, 张建军, 葛道阔, 张文宇, 刘岩, 李龙, 王周庆. 花期渍害胁迫下冬油菜生长及产量模拟研究. 中国农业科技导报, 2015, 17(1): 137-145.
CAO H X, YANG T M, JIANG Y L, LIU R N, ZHANG J J, GE D K, ZHANG W Y, LIU Y, LI L, WANG Z Q. Studies on simulation of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) growth and yield under water-logging stress at anthesis. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2015, 17(1): 137-145. (in Chinese)
[25] R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014. http://www.R-project.org/.
[26] Gallagher C. Extending the linear model with R: Generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2007, 102: 480, 1477.
[27]   丛野, 李艳君, 周灿金, 邹崇顺, 张学昆, 廖星, 张春雷. 氮, 磷, 钾对湿害胁迫下甘蓝型油菜产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(5): 1122-1129.
CONG Y, LI Y J, ZHOU C J, ZOU C S, ZHANG X K, LIAO X, ZHANG C L. Effect of application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under the waterlogging stress. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(5): 1122-1129. (in Chinese)
[28]   ZHOU W, ZHAO D, LIN X. Effects of waterlogging on nitrogen accumulation and alleviation of waterlogging damage by application of nitrogen fertilizer and mixtalol in winter rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1997, 16(1): 47-53.
[29]   田一丹, 韩亮亮, 周琴, 张国正, 邢邯, 江海东. 大豆对渍水的生理响应 I: 光合特性和糖代谢. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34 (3): 262-267.
TIAN Y D, HAN L L, ZHOU Q, ZHANG G Z, XING H, JIANG H D. Physiological response of soybean to waterlogging Ⅰ. Photosynthetic characteristics and sugar metabolism. Chinese Journal of Oilcrop Sciences, 2012, 34(3): 262-267. (in Chinese)
[30]   郭文琦, 刘瑞显, 周治国, 陈兵林. 施氮量对花铃期短期渍水棉花叶片气体交换参数和叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16 (2): 362-369.
GUO W Q, LIU R X, ZHOU Z G, CHEN B L. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of leaf during the flowering and boll-forming stage of cotton under short-term waterlogging. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(2): 362-369. (in Chinese)
[31]   范雪梅, 姜东, 戴廷波, 荆奇, 曹卫星. 花后干旱或渍水逆境下氮素对小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30 (1): 71-77.
FAN X M, JIANG D, DAI T B, JING Q, CAO W X. Effects of nitrogen on grain yield and quality in wheat grown under drought or waterlogging stress from anthesis to maturity. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(1): 71-77. (in Chinese)
[32]   XU M, MA H, ZENG L, CHENG Y, LU G, XU J, ZHANG X, ZOU  X. The effect of waterlogging on yield and seed quality at the early flowering stage in Brassica napus L. Field Crops Research, 2015, 180: 238-245.
[1] ZHANG XiaoLi, TAO Wei, GAO GuoQing, CHEN Lei, GUO Hui, ZHANG Hua, TANG MaoYan, LIANG TianFeng. Effects of Direct Seeding Cultivation Method on Growth Stage, Lodging Resistance and Yield Benefit of Double-Cropping Early Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[2] WANG XuanDong, SONG Zhen, LAN HeTing, JIANG YingZi, QI WenJie, LIU XiaoYang, JIANG DongHua. Isolation of Dominant Actinomycetes from Soil of Waxberry Orchards and Its Disease Prevention and Growth-Promotion Function [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 275-286.
[3] YAN YanGe, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, ZHAO BingQiang, YUAN Liang. Effects of Dextran Modified Urea on Winter Wheat Yield and Fate of Nitrogen Fertilizer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 287-299.
[4] XU JiuKai, YUAN Liang, WEN YanChen, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, LI HaiYan, ZHAO BingQiang. Nitrogen Fertilizer Replacement Value of Livestock Manure in the Winter Wheat Growing Season [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[5] WANG CaiXiang,YUAN WenMin,LIU JuanJuan,XIE XiaoYu,MA Qi,JU JiSheng,CHEN Da,WANG Ning,FENG KeYun,SU JunJi. Comprehensive Evaluation and Breeding Evolution of Early Maturing Upland Cotton Varieties in the Northwest Inland of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 1-16.
[6] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[7] ZHANG Wei,YAN LingLing,FU ZhiQiang,XU Ying,GUO HuiJuan,ZHOU MengYao,LONG Pan. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield of Double Cropping Rice and Utilization Efficiency of Light and Heat Energy in Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 31-45.
[8] XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[9] LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[10] GUO ShiBo,ZHANG FangLiang,ZHANG ZhenTao,ZHOU LiTao,ZHAO Jin,YANG XiaoGuang. The Possible Effects of Global Warming on Cropping Systems in China XIV. Distribution of High-Stable-Yield Zones and Agro-Meteorological Disasters of Soybean in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1763-1780.
[11] WANG HaoLin,MA Yue,LI YongHua,LI Chao,ZHAO MingQin,YUAN AiJing,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui. Optimal Management of Phosphorus Fertilization Based on the Yield and Grain Manganese Concentration of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[12] SANG ShiFei,CAO MengYu,WANG YaNan,WANG JunYi,SUN XiaoHan,ZHANG WenLing,JI ShengDong. Research Progress of Nitrogen Efficiency Related Genes in Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1479-1491.
[13] GUI RunFei,WANG ZaiMan,PAN ShengGang,ZHANG MingHua,TANG XiangRu,MO ZhaoWen. Effects of Nitrogen-Reducing Side Deep Application of Liquid Fertilizer at Tillering Stage on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Fragrant Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[14] LIAO Ping,MENG Yi,WENG WenAn,HUANG Shan,ZENG YongJun,ZHANG HongCheng. Effects of Hybrid Rice on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556.
[15] MA XiaoYan,YANG Yu,HUANG DongLin,WANG ZhaoHui,GAO YaJun,LI YongGang,LÜ Hui. Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!