Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (16): 3170-3184.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.16.009

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Resources Input and Environmental Effects for Maize Production in the Three Provinces of Northeast China

CHEN XuHao1(),GAO Qiang2,CHEN XinPing1,ZHANG WuShuai1()   

  1. 1College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
    2College of Resources and Environment, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118
  • Received:2021-06-03 Accepted:2021-07-28 Online:2022-08-16 Published:2022-08-11
  • Contact: WuShuai ZHANG E-mail:1228573145@qq.com;wszhang@swu.edu.cn

Abstract:

【Objective】The total production of maize is the highest among the three staple grain crops in China, ranking second position in the world. The planting area of maize in the three provinces of northeast China accounts for 39% of China, while the investment of resources is relatively low. The purpose of this study is to clarify the temporal and spatial characteristics of resources input and environmental effects for maize production in the three provinces of northeast China. 【Method】 In this paper, based on the life cycle assessment (LCA) method, the reactive nitrogen loss model suitable for maize production in the three provinces of northeast China was used to quantitatively evaluate the resources input (fertilizer, pesticide and diesel oil, etc.) and related environmental risks such as reactive nitrogen losses and GHG emissions of maize production systems in Northeast China from 2007 to 2016. 【Result】The average total fertilizer application rate of maize production in Jilin Province was 400 kg·hm-2, the average yield per unit area was 7 065 kg·hm-2, the average GHG emissions per unit area was 2 965 kg CO2 eq·hm-2, all of the above were the highest in the three provinces, but the carbon and nitrogen footprint was low, and the average reactive N losses per unit area was in the middle level and changed little from year to year. The average nitrogen input of Liaoning Province was 184 kg·hm-2, the average N loss per unit area was 20.8 kg N·hm-2, and carbon and nitrogen footprint was 493 kg CO2 eq·Mg-1 and 3.53 kg N·Mg-1, respectively, all of which were the highest. The per unit yield of 5 966 kg·hm-2, was in the middle level, and the GHG emission did not change much from year to year. The average nitrogen application rate in Heilongjiang Province was 149 kg·hm-2 per unit yield, the average unit area N losses and GHG emissions were the lowest in the three provinces, while the carbon and nitrogen footprint were in the middle level. From 2008 to 2015, the planting area of maize in the three provinces of northeast China increased year by year, with a cumulative increase of 5.73 million hectares. In 2015, the total maize production of the three provinces was the highest, reaching 91.16 million tons, accounting for 32% of the country's ten-year (2007-2016) average production, of which Heilongjiang Province, Jilin Province and Liaoning Province accounted for 13.9%, 11.7%, and 6.7%, respectively. The ten-year average planting area accounted for 30% of the country, of which Heilongjiang Province, Jilin Province and Liaoning Province accounted for 14.7%, 9.3%, and 6.4%, respectively. The ten-year average maize grain yield in the three provinces of northeast China was 6 116 kg·hm-2, and the highest average yield was achieved in 2013, which was 6 824 kg·hm-2. During 2007 to 2016, the fertilizer input of maize production in the three provinces of northeast China showed an overall upward trend, nitrogen fertilizer decreased steadily, while phosphorus and potassium fertilizer increased year by year. From 2014 to 2016, the increase trend of fertilizers rate slowed down sharply and gradually became stable. The ten-year average rate of nitrogen, phosphate and potassium fertilizers were 177, 101, and 70.2 kg·hm-2, respectively. From 2007 to 2016, the pesticide input for maize production in Northeast China showed a steady upward trend, while the diesel input was relatively stable in the first four years, and then gradually increased. During the ten years of maize production in Northeast China, the average rate of pesticide used was 10.2 kg·hm-2, and that of diesel was 94.6 kg·hm-2. The average N losses and GHG emissions per unit area of maize production in 2007-2016 were 19.0 kg N·hm-2 and 2 770 kg CO2 eq·hm-2, respectively. The reactive nitrogen losses per unit area was stable from 2007 to 2016. The average GHG emissions of maize production showed a downward trend in 2007-2008 and 2009-2011, a steady upward trend in 2012-2016, and reached the highest with 3 045 kg CO2 eq·hm-2 in 2016. Ammonia volatilization caused by field application of nitrogen fertilizer was the main way of reactive nitrogen losses in maize production, followed by nitrate leaching loss, and nitrous oxide emission. The main emission sector of GHG emissions was fertilizer production, transportation and field application. During the past ten years, the average nitrogen footprint and carbon footprint of maize production in Northeast China were 3.16 kg N·Mg-1 and 459 kg CO2 eq·Mg-1, respectively. 【Conclusion】The resource inputs and environmental cost of maize production in the three provinces of northeast China were significantly different on the spatial scale. The average fertilizer input of Jilin Province was 124 kg·hm-2 higher than that of Heilongjiang Province, while the GHG emissions were 524 kg CO2 eq·hm-2 higher. In 2007-2016, the nitrogen input for maize production in the three provinces of northeast China ranged from 170 to182 kg·hm-2, N losses ranged from 18.4 to19.4 kg N·hm-2, which played a good demonstration role for the green development of agriculture in China. The carbon and nitrogen footprint of maize production mainly depended on the trade-off between resource input and yield per unit area, noticeably, the nitrogen fertilizer input had a greater impact. The spatial-temporal characteristics analysis of resource inputs and environmental effects for maize production in the three provinces of northeast China contributes to clarify the limiting factors and main controlling factors at present stage, and provides theoretical support for optimizing nutrient management to achieve win-win situation of food security and carbon emission reduction.

Key words: reactive nitrogen losses, greenhouse gas emission, nitrogen footprint, carbon footprint, temporal and spatial characteristics, resources input, maize, three provinces of Northeast China

Table 1

Average rate of nutrients, pesticide and diesel for maize production in the three provinces of Northeast China in 2007-2016"

省份
Province
N
(kg·hm-2)
P2O5
(kg·hm-2)
K2O
(kg·hm-2)
农药
Pesticide (kg·hm-2)
柴油
Diesel (L·hm-2)
辽宁Liaoning 198±10.5 101±13.5 69.6±17.3 12.4±3.4 145±52.5
吉林Jilin 184±7.9 122±18.1 93.7±21.2 9.7± 1.6 117±27.3
黑龙江Heilongjiang 149±14.8 79.1±12.4 47.4±9.9 6.8±1.6 110±26.8

Fig. 1

Total planting area (a) and total production (b) of maize in the three provinces of Northeast China from 2007 to 2016. The proportion of mean planting area (c) and mean total production (d) in national maize production"

Fig. 2

Interannual variation of fertilizers (a), pesticide (b), diesel (c) and yield (d) of maize production in the three provinces of Northeast China"

Fig. 3

Interannual variation of reactive nitrogen losses (a) and nitrogen footprint (b) of maize production in the three provinces of Northeast China"

Fig. 4

Interannual variation of GHG emissions (a) and carbon footprint (b) of maize production in the three provinces of Northeast China"

Fig. 5

Radar map of resource input and environmental effect in the three provinces of Northeast China"

Table 2

Comparison of environmental costs of maize production in the three provinces of Northeast China and other producing areas"

地区
Region
活性氮损失量
Reactive N lossess
(kg N·hm-2)
氮足迹
N footprint
(kg N·Mg-1)
GHG排放量
GHG emission
(kg CO2 eq·hm-2)
碳足迹
Carbon footprint
(kg CO2 eq·Mg-1)
数据来源
Data source
辽宁 Liaoning 20.8 3.53 2904 493 本文 This study
吉林 Jiling 19.6 2.80 2965 422 本文This study
黑龙江 Heilongjiang 16.7 3.17 2441 461 本文 This study
黄淮海夏玉米区 HHH summer maize region 79.3 14.7 3235 436 [4,12]
西北春玉米区 Northwest spring maize region 24.8 4.52 3691 487 [4,12]
西南玉米区 Southwest maize region 56.7 12.0 3870 710 [4,12]

Fig. 6

Temporal trends of total fertilizer (a), pesticide (b), diesel (c) and grain yield (d) of maize planting in the three provinces of Northeast China in difference years"

Fig. 7

Reactive nitrogen losses (a) and nitrogen footprint (b) of maize production in the three provinces of Northeast China in different years"

Fig. 8

Greenhouse gas emissions (a), carbon footprint (b) and the proportion of main contributors to GHG emissions (c) of maize production in the three provinces of Northeast China in different years"

[1] 吴良泉, 武良, 崔振岭, 陈新平, 张福锁. 中国玉米区域氮磷钾肥推荐用量及肥料配方研究. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(4): 802-817.
WU L Q, WU L, CUI Z L, CHEN X P, ZHANG F S. Basic npk fertilizer recommendation and fertilizer formula for maize production regions in China. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(4): 802-817. (in Chinese)
[2] 中国农业年鉴编委会. 中国农业年鉴. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2018.
China Agricultural Yearbook Editorial Board. China Agriculture Yearbook. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2018. (in Chinese)
[3] 中国农业年鉴编委会. 中国农业年鉴. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2020.
China Agricultural Yearbook Editorial Board. China Agriculture Yearbook. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2020. (in Chinese)
[4] 武良. 基于总量控制的中国农业氮肥需求及温室气体减排潜力研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2014.
WU L. Nitrogen fertilizer demand and greenhouse gas mitigation potential under nitrogen limiting conditions for Chinese agriculture production[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[5] JU X T, KOU C L, CHRISTIE P, DOU Z X, ZHANG F S. Changes in the soil environment from excessive application of fertilizers and manures to two contrasting intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain. Environmental Pollution, 2007, 145(2): 497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.04.017.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.04.017
[6] 王占彪, 王猛, 陈阜. 华北平原作物生产碳足迹分析. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(1): 83-92.
WANG Z B, WANG M, CHEN F. Carbon footprint analysis of crop production in North China plain. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(1): 83-92. (in Chinese)
[7] CARLSON K M, GERBER J S, MUELLER N D, HERRERO M, MACDONALD G K, BRAUMAN K A, HAVLIK P, O’CONNELL C S, JOHNSON J A, SAATCHI S, WEST P C. Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(1): 63-68. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3158.
doi: 10.1038/nclimate3158
[8] NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission of China) (2012). Second National Communication on Climate Change. The People’s Republic of China. Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission of China. Available from: http://nc.ccchina.gov.cn/WebSite/NationalCCC/UpFile/File116.pdf (verified 5 June 2012).
[9] CHEN X P, CUI Z L, FAN M S, VITOUSEK P, ZHAO M, MA W Q, WANG Z L, ZHANG W J, YAN X Y, YANG J C, DENG X P, GAO Q, ZHANG Q, GUO S W, REN J, LI S Q, YE Y L, WANG Z H, HUANG J L, TANG Q Y, SUN Y X, PENG X L, ZHANG J W, HE M R, ZHU Y J, XUE J Q, WANG G L, WU L, AN N, WU L Q, MA L, ZHANG W F, ZHANG F S. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature, 2014, 514(7523): 486-489. doi: 10.1038/ nature13609.
doi: 10.1038/ nature13609
[10] 张国, 逯非, 黄志刚, 陈舜, 王效科. 我国主粮作物的化学农药用量及其温室气体排放估算. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9): 2875-2883. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.031.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.031
ZHANG G, LU F, HUANG Z G, CHEN S, WANG X K. Estimations of application dosage and greenhouse gas emission of chemical pesticides in staple crops in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(9): 2875-2883. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609. 031. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.031
[11] ZHANG G, WANG X K, SUN B F, ZHAO H, LU F, ZHANG L. Status of mineral nitrogen fertilization and net mitigation potential of the state fertilization recommendation in Chinese cropland. Agricultural Systems, 2016, 146: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016. 03.012.
doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016. 03.012
[12] 张务帅. 我国玉米生产温室气体排放和活性氮损失评价及其减排潜力与调控途[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2019.
ZHANG W S. Greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen losses assessment, mitigation potentials and management approaches of maize production in China[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[13] 姜明红, 刘欣超, 唐华俊, 辛晓平, 陈吉泉, 董刚, 吴汝群, 邵长亮. 生命周期评价在畜牧生产中的应用研究现状及展望. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(9): 1635-1645.
JIANG M H, LIU X C, TANG H J, XIN X P, CHEN J Q, DONG G, WU R Q, SHAO C L. Research progress and prospect of life cycle assessment in animal husbandry. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(9): 1635-1645. (in Chinese)
[14] CUI Z L, ZHANG H Y, CHEN X P, ZHANG C C, MA W Q, HUANG C D, ZHANG W F, MI G H, MIAO Y X, LI X L, GAO Q, YANG J C, WANG Z H, YE Y L, GUO S W, LU J W, HUANG J L, LV S H, SUN Y X, LIU Y Y, PENG X L, REN J, LI S Q, DENG X P, SHI X J, ZHANG Q, YANG Z P, TANG L, WEI C Z, JIA L L, ZHANG J W, HE M R, TONG Y N, TANG Q Y, ZHONG X H, LIU Z H, CAO N, KOU C L, YING H, YIN Y L, JIAO X Q, ZHANG Q S, FAN M S, JIANG R F, ZHANG F S, DOU Z X. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature, 2018, 555(7696): 363-366. doi: 10.1038/nature25785.
doi: 10.1038/nature25785
[15] IPCC. Climate Change 2013:The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[16] ZHANG W F, DOU Z X, HE P, JU X T, POWLSON D, CHADWICK D, NORSE D, LU Y L, ZHANG Y, WU L, CHEN X P, CASSMAN K G, ZHANG F S. New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(21): 8375-8380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210447110.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210447110
[17] IPCC. Guildelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, vol. 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programmer. Japan, 2006.
[18] 狄向华, 聂祚仁, 左铁镛. 中国火力发电燃料消耗的生命周期排放清单. 中国环境科学, 2005, 25(5): 632-635. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2005.05.029.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2005.05.029
DI X H, NIE Z R, ZUO T Y. Life cycle emission inventories for the fuels consumed by thermal power in China. China Environmental Science, 2005, 25(5): 632-635. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2005.05.029. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2005.05.029
[19] 袁宝荣, 聂祚仁, 狄向华, 左铁镛. 中国化石能源生产的生命周期清单(Ⅰ): 能源消耗与直接排放. 现代化工, 2006, 26(3): 59-62, 64. doi: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2006.03.017.
doi: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2006.03.017
YUAN B R, NIE Z R, DI X H, ZUO T Y. Life cycle inventories of fossil fuels in China(Ⅰ): energy sources consumption and direct pollutant emissions. Modern Chemical Industry, 2006, 26(3): 59-62, 64. doi: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2006.03.017. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2006.03.017
[20] 袁宝荣, 聂祚仁, 狄向华, 左铁镛. 中国化石能源生产的生命周期清单(Ⅱ): 生命周期清单的编制结果. 现代化工, 2006, 26(4): 59-61. doi: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2006.04.019.
doi: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2006.04.019
YUAN B R, NIE Z R, DI X H, ZUO T Y. Life cycle inventories of fossil fuels in China(Ⅱ): final life cycle inventories. Modern Chemical Industry, 2006, 26(4): 59-61. doi: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2006.04.019. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2006.04.019
[21] WILLIAMS A G, AUDSLEY E, SANDARS D L. Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Final report to Defra on project IS0205. Available on www.agrilca.org and www.defra.gov.uk. 2006.
[22] 李晓立, 何堂庆, 张晨曦, 田明慧, 吴梅, 李潮海, 杨青华, 张学林. 等氮量条件下有机肥替代化肥对玉米农田温室气体排放的影响. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 948-961. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.009.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.009
LI X L, HE T Q, ZHANG C X, TIAN M H, WU M, LI C H, YANG Q H, ZHANG X L. Effect of organic fertilizer replacing chemical fertilizers on greenhouse gas emission under the conditions of same nitrogen fertilizer input in maize farmland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 948-961. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.009. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.009
[23] JAYASUNDARA S, WAGNER-RIDDLE C, DIAS G, KARIYAPPERUMA K A. Energy and greenhouse gas intensity of corn (Zea mays L.) production in Ontario: a regional assessment. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2014, 94(1): 77-95. doi: 10.4141/cjss2013-044.
doi: 10.4141/cjss2013-044
[24] 齐晔, 李惠民, 王晓. 农业与中国的低碳发展战略. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(1): 1-6.
QI Y, LI H M, WANG X. Agriculture and low-carbon development strategy in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(1): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[25] GRASSINI P, CASSMAN K G. High-yield maize with large net energy yield and small global warming intensity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(4): 1074-1079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116364109.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116364109
[26] FELTEN D, FRÖBA N, FRIES J, EMMERLING C. Energy balances and greenhouse gas-mitigation potentials of bioenergy cropping systems (Miscanthus, rapeseed, and maize) based on farming conditions in Western Germany. Renewable Energy, 2013, 55: 160-174. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.004
[27] FORTE A, FAGNANO M, FIERRO A. Potential role of compost and green manure amendment to mitigate soil GHGs emissions in Mediterranean drip irrigated maize production systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 192: 68-78. doi: 10.1016/j. jenvman.2017.01.037.
doi: 10.1016/j. jenvman.2017.01.037
[28] MA B L, LIANG B C, BISWAS D K, MORRISON M J, MCLAUGHLIN N B. The carbon footprint of maize production as affected by nitrogen fertilizer and maize-legume rotations. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2012, 94(1): 15-31. doi: 10.1007/s10705- 012-9522-0.
doi: 10.1007/s10705- 012-9522-0
[29] DENDOOVEN L, GUTIÉRREZ-OLIVA V F, PATIÑO-ZÚÑIGA L, RAMÍREZ-VILLANUEVA D A, VERHULST N, LUNA-GUIDO M, MARSCH R, MONTES-MOLINA J, GUTIÉRREZ-MICELI F A, VÁSQUEZ-MURRIETA S, GOVAERTS B. Greenhouse gas emissions under conservation agriculture compared to traditional cultivation of maize in the central Highlands of Mexico. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 431: 237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2012.05.029.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2012.05.029
[30] HE X Q, QIAO Y H, LIU Y X, DENDLER L, YIN C, MARTIN F. Environmental impact assessment of organic and conventional tomato production in urban greenhouses of Beijing City, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 134: 251-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015. 12.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015. 12.004
[31] MUELLER N D, GERBER J S, JOHNSTON M, RAY D K, RAMANKUTTY N, FOLEY J A. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature, 2012, 490(7419): 254-257. doi: 10. 1038/nature11420.
doi: 10. 1038/nature11420
[32] ZHANG Z S, GUO L J, LIU T Q, LI C F, CAO C G. Effects of tillage practices and straw returning methods on greenhouse gas emissions and net ecosystem economic budget in rice-wheat cropping systems in central China. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 122: 636-644. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.065.
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.065
[33] 丁相鹏, 李广浩, 张吉旺, 刘鹏, 任佰朝, 赵斌. 控释尿素基施深度对夏玉米产量和氮素利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(21): 4342-4354. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.004.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.004
DING X P, LI G H, ZHANG J W, LIU P, REN B Z, ZHAO B. Effects of base application depths of controlled release urea on yield and nitrogen utilization of summer maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4342-4354. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.004. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.004
[34] GRANT C. Policy aspects related to the use of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers:viewpoint of the scientific community. In: IFA International Workshop on Enhanced-Efficiency Fertilizers. Frankfurt: International Fertilizer Association, 2005: 1-11.
[35] BOLAN N S, SAGGAR S, LUO J F, BHANDRAL R, SINGH J. Gaseous emissions of nitrogen from grazed pastures: processes, measurements and modelling, environmental implications, and mitigation. Advances in Agronomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004: 37-120. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2113(04)84002-1.
doi: 10.1016/s0065-2113(04)84002-1
[36] LI T Y, ZHANG W F, YIN J, CHADWICK D, NORSE D, LU Y L, LIU X J, CHEN X P, ZHANG F S, POWLSON D, DOU Z X. Enhanced-efficiency fertilizers are not a panacea for resolving the nitrogen problem. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(2): e511-e521. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13918.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13918
[37] HAN J P, SHI L S, WANG Y K, CHEN Z W, WU L S. The regulatory role of endogenous iron on greenhouse gas emissions under intensive nitrogen fertilization in subtropical soils of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2018, 25(15): 14511-14520. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1666-2.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1666-2
[38] ZHANG X X, SUN H F, WANG J L, ZHANG J N, LIU G L, ZHOU S. Effect of moisture gradient on rice yields and greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2019, 26(32): 33416-33426. doi: 10.1007/ s11356-019-06451-w.
doi: 10.1007/ s11356-019-06451-w
[39] RADA N E, FUGLIE K O. New perspectives on farm size and productivity. Food Policy, 2019, 84: 147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.03.015.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.03.015
[40] SYP A, FABER A, BORZECKA-WALKER M, OSUCH D. Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in winter wheat farms using data envelopment analysis approach. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2015, 24: 2197-2203. doi: 10.15244/pjoes/39682.
doi: 10.15244/pjoes/39682
[41] ZHANG W S, QIAN C R, CARLSON K M, GE X L, WANG X B, CHEN X P. Increasing farm size to improve energy use efficiency and sustainability in maize production. Food and Energy Security, 2021, 10(1): e271. doi: 10.1002/fes3.271.
doi: 10.1002/fes3.271
[42] ZHU Y C, WAQAS M A, LI Y E, ZOU X X, JIANG D F, WILKES A, QIN X B, GAO Q Z, WAN Y F, HASBAGAN G. Large-scale farming operations are win-win for grain production, soil carbon storage and mitigation of greenhouse gases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 172: 2143-2152. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.205.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.205
[1] CHEN XiaoWei, WANG XiaoLong. Accounting Framework of Carbon Footprint on Integrated Cropping-Breeding Farming System: A Case on Maize-Cow-Recycling Manure Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 314-332.
[2] CHAI HaiYan,JIA Jiao,BAI Xue,MENG LingMin,ZHANG Wei,JIN Rong,WU HongBin,SU QianFu. Identification of Pathogenic Fusarium spp. Causing Maize Ear Rot and Susceptibility of Some Strains to Fungicides in Jilin Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 64-78.
[3] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[4] LI ZhouShuai,DONG Yuan,LI Ting,FENG ZhiQian,DUAN YingXin,YANG MingXian,XU ShuTu,ZHANG XingHua,XUE JiQuan. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Yield and Combining Ability Based on Maize Hybrid Population [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1695-1709.
[5] XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[6] LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[7] MA XiaoYan,YANG Yu,HUANG DongLin,WANG ZhaoHui,GAO YaJun,LI YongGang,LÜ Hui. Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[8] LI Qian,QIN YuBo,YIN CaiXia,KONG LiLi,WANG Meng,HOU YunPeng,SUN Bo,ZHAO YinKai,XU Chen,LIU ZhiQuan. Effect of Drip Fertigation Mode on Maize Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[9] ZHANG JiaHua,YANG HengShan,ZHANG YuQin,LI CongFeng,ZHANG RuiFu,TAI JiCheng,ZHOU YangChen. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Modes on Starch Accumulation and Activities of Starch Synthesis-Related Enzyme of Spring Maize Grain in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1332-1345.
[10] TAN XianMing,ZHANG JiaWei,WANG ZhongLin,CHEN JunXu,YANG Feng,YANG WenYu. Prediction of Maize Yield in Relay Strip Intercropping Under Different Water and Nitrogen Conditions Based on PLS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138.
[11] LIU Miao,LIU PengZhao,SHI ZuJiao,WANG XiaoLi,WANG Rui,LI Jun. Critical Nitrogen Dilution Curve and Nitrogen Nutrition Diagnosis of Summer Maize Under Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 932-947.
[12] LI XiaoLi,HE TangQing,ZHANG ChenXi,TIAN MingHui,WU Mei,LI ChaoHai,YANG QingHua,ZHANG XueLin. Effect of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Chemical Fertilizers on Greenhouse Gas Emission Under the Conditions of Same Nitrogen Fertilizer Input in Maize Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 948-961.
[13] QIAO Yuan,YANG Huan,LUO JinLin,WANG SiXian,LIANG LanYue,CHEN XinPing,ZHANG WuShuai. Inputs and Ecological Environment Risks Assessment of Maize Production in Northwest China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 962-976.
[14] HUANG ZhaoFu, LI LuLu, HOU LiangYu, GAO Shang, MING Bo, XIE RuiZhi, HOU Peng, WANG KeRu, XUE Jun, LI ShaoKun. Accumulated Temperature Requirement for Field Stalk Dehydration After Maize Physiological Maturity in Different Planting Regions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 680-691.
[15] FANG MengYing,LU Lin,WANG QingYan,DONG XueRui,YAN Peng,DONG ZhiQiang. Effects of Ethylene-Chlormequat-Potassium on Root Morphological Construction and Yield of Summer Maize with Different Nitrogen Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4808-4822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!