Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (7): 1150-1163.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.003

Special Issue: SPECIAL FOCUS ON GRAPE RESEARCH

• SPECIAL FOCUS ON GRAPE RESEARCH • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Two Trellis Systems on Viticultural Characteristics and Fruit Quality of Three Table Grape Cultivars

WANG XiaoYue1,ZHANG GuoJun1,SUN Lei1,ZHAO Yin2,YAN AiLing1,WANG HuiLing1,REN JianCheng1,XU HaiYing1()   

  1. 1 Beijing Academy of Forestry and Pomology Sciences/Beijing Engineering Research Center for Deciduous Fruit Trees/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops(North China), Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100093
    2 The Wine Industry Promotion Center of Fangshan District of Beijing, Beijing 102413
  • Received:2018-07-09 Accepted:2018-12-10 Online:2019-04-01 Published:2019-04-04
  • Contact: HaiYing XU E-mail:haiyingxu63@sina.com

Abstract:

【Objective】The effects of two different trellis systems on viticultural characteristics, fruit quality and disease incidence of three table grape cultivars were studied deeply to provide theoretical basis for the selection of appropriate trellis system for Northern China alluvial plain.【Method】Vitis vinifera L. were used as plant materials, including Ruiducuixia, Ruiduwuheyi and Ruiduhongyu, which were planted with “T” shaped and “V” shaped trellis systems, respectively. Phenological stages, fruiting habits, photosynthetic characteristics, vine structure, labor intensity, fruit quality indexes including cluster weight, berry weight, berry width, berry length, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), total anthocyanins, flavonoid and proanthocyanidin of three cultivars in both trellis systems were measured.【Result】There was no significant difference in phenological stages or fruiting habits. In most cases, percentage of germination showed higher value with T-trellis, while other fruiting habits showed no significant differences. T-trellis showed considerable advantages in management operations of the vineyard, in terms of the lateral shoot management, topping of primary shoot, fruit branch binding and winter pruning. Both Soil-bury and untying hours in the fall and out-of-soil and tying hours in the spring showed no statistically difference between the two trellis systems. Ruiducuixia showed higher net photosynthetic rate (Pn) with V-trellis in 2017, Ruiduwuheyi showed higher Pn with V-trellis in 2016, in other cases, T-trellis showed significantly higher Pn. Ruiduwuheyi showed higher stomatal conductance with T-trellis for the three years but the other two cultivars showed inconsistent results. Ruiducuixia had a higher transpiration rate with V-trellis; Ruiduxiangyu had the same trend in 2016. In most cases, there was no difference in intercellular CO2 concentration between the two trellis systems. The shoot width of three cultivars showed trivial difference between the two trellis systems in 2017. However, after the vigor of the vine had been trained to a moderate level, the standard deviation of shoot width of T-trellis had decreased to 2.3, 2.6 and 2.3 for the three cultivars, lower than that of V-trellis (2.7, 2.75 and 3.0), showing higher shoot consistency. Three cultivars showed different results of canopy height and canopy length, while the grapevines grown with V-trellis had larger canopy volume. Leaf area index of Ruiducuixia and Ruiduxiangyu were much higher with V-trellis than T-trellis, while Ruiduwuheyi showed the opposite. The leaf chlorophyll between the two trellis systems showed no statistical difference. As for leaf disease, V-trellis showed much higher disease index and incidence of downy mildew than T-trellis, while no difference was found on powdery mildew. There was no significant difference in cluster weight, single berry weight, vertical diameter, horizontal diameter or total soluble solids. With T-trellis, TSS/TA was in a better range which made the berries taste more balanced and desirable. Ruiducuixia and Ruiduwuheyi showed higher total anthocyanins with T-trellis; all three cultivars had higher level of flavonoid with T-trellis; besides, Ruiduwuheyi showed higher value of proanthocyanidin with T-trellis system, while the other two cultivars showed no significant difference. 【Conclusion】 Based on the three-year study, for soil-bury grape growing areas in Northern China alluvial plain, T-trellis system showed higher photosynthetic use efficiency, less disease incidence, better shoot consistency, higher fruit quality and less labor intensity for vineyard management, manifesting an favorable trellis system to be promoted and practiced in commercial vineyards.

Key words: grape, trellis system, vine vigor, fruit quality

Table 1

Weather conditions from 2015 to 2017"

生长季
Growing period
平均温度
Mean temperature (℃)
相对湿度
Relative humidity (%)
风速
Wind speed (km?h-1)
降雨量
Precipitation (mm)
有效积温
Growing degree days
2015
4月April 14.7 45.7 11.3 34.29 134.0
5月May 20.8 44.3 11.3 24.89 290.0
6月June 24.4 57.9 9.3 34.80 407.5
7月July 26.5 65.7 7.6 83.07 481.0
8月August 26.1 68.6 7.3 71.10 501.0
9月September 20.6 71.2 8.1 50.54 302.5
10月October 13.8 59.2 9.3 14.22 130.5
11月November 2.9 78.9 7.5 17.28 0.5
均值/总合Average/Total 18.7 61.4 9.0 330.20 2247
2016
4月April 15.5 38.8 11.4 5.59 159.5
5月May 20.2 45.0 10.9 17.77 297.0
6月June 24.9 57.7 8.5 61.47 421.5
7月July 27.1 69.4 7.9 181.61 501.0
8月August 27.0 66.3 8.1 71.37 500.0
9月September 21.3 66.2 7.7 56.13 335.5
10月October 12.9 72.4 8.0 50.30 113.0
11月November 3.52 62.1 8.6 7.87 1.5
均值/总合Average/Total 19.1 59.7 8.9 452.11 2329
2017
4月April 15.5 36.4 10.6 0 124.5
5月May 22.0 40.9 10.5 28.95 293.5
6月June 24.7 50.5 9.0 80.78 357.5
7月July 27.3 75.0 7.7 63.51 443.5
8月August 25.9 73.3 7.5 199.9 423
9月September 21.7 64.5 7.4 3.05 318
10月October 12.3 72.5 7.1 32.77 80.5
11月November 3.1 46.0 10.3 0 4.0
均值/总合Average/Total 19.1 57.4 8.8 408.96 2044.5

Fig. 1

Sketch of two trellis systems A: T-trellis; B: V-trellis"

Table 2

Phenological stages of three cultivars in two trellis systems from 2015 to 2017"

年份
Year
品种
Cultivar
架式
Trellis system
萌芽期
Bud break (M-D)
初花期
First bloom (M-D)
始熟期
Veraison (M-D)
新梢始熟期
Cane maturation (M-D)
2015 CX T 4-18 5-26 7-6 9-6
V 4-19 5-27 7-9 9-1
WHY T 4-22 5-27 7-19 8-25
V 4-22 5-26 7-22 8-2
XY T 4-21 5-24 7-13 8-14
V 4-19 5-24 7-13 8-5
2016 CX T 4-18 5-23 7-2 9-9
V 4-18 5-22 7-2 9-1
WHY T 4-21 5-28 7-24 8-28
V 4-22 5-26 7-24 8-26
XY T 4-17 5-20 7-25 8-25
V 4-18 5-19 7-24 8-27
2017 CX T 4-18 5-19 7-5 8-28
V 4-18 5-19 7-4 8-25
WHY T 4-21 5-20 7-16 8-18
V 4-22 5-20 7-16 8-18
XY T 4-17 5-16 7-6 8-26
V 4-18 5-16 7-9 8-28

Table 3

Fruiting habit of three cultivars in two trellis systems from 2015 to 2017"

年份
Year
品种
Cultivar
架式
Trellis system
萌芽率
Percentage of germination (%)
结果枝率
Percentage of bearing shoots (%)
结果系数
Cluster number per bearing shoot
2015 CX T 95.3±2.2* 83.8±4.7 1.73±0.1
V 48.3±4.8 94.2±1.7 1.80±0.1
WHY T 71.0±3.1 66.2±2.0 1.21±0.0
V 39.2±4.0 69.4±6.5 1.09±0.0
XY T 86.7±3.3* 54.7±17.6 1.63±0.1
V 47.6±3.3 80.0±2.0 1.88±0.1
2016 CX T 67.8±3.9 90.0±1.1 1.83±0.1
V 63.8±3.3 93.3±4.1 1.57±0.0
WHY T 72.0±1.5 87.4±3.6 1.45±0.1
V 70.5±2.0 75.8±10.5 1.17±0.0
XY T 72.0±2.9 59.0±8.2 1.11±0.1
V 61.1±3.6 71.5±4.4 1.56±0.1
2017 CX T 73.1±5.0 77.8±6.1 1.52±0.1
V 64.6±8.1 71.6±6.1 1.49±0.0
WHY T 67.4±7.6 76.6±7.4 1.35±0.1
V 67.9±3.7 54.1±21.5 1.30±0.1
XY T 60.5±3.7 71.6±7.7 1.41±0.2
V 67.7±8.0 61.9±3.8 1.71±0.1

Table 4

Characteristics and labor intensity of two trellis systems"

项目 Parameter V型 V-trellis T型 T-trellis
长势Vigor 较旺 Vigorous 中庸 Moderate
顶端优势 Apical dominance 较明显 Obvious 不明显 Not obvious
结果带距地面高度Fruit setting height (cm) 40 170
出土上架工时(时/人·亩)Out-of-soil and tying hours per person per 1/6 acre 24 24
副梢管理次数(/年)Lateral shoot management times (/year) 10 5
摘心次数(/年)Topping times (/year) 1—2 1
结果枝绑缚次数(/年)Fruit branch binding times (/year) 2 1
冬季修剪工时(时/人·亩)Winter pruning hours per person per 1/6 acre 2 1.33
下架埋土工时(时/人·亩) Soil-bury and untying hours per person per 1/6 acre 3.2 3.2

Fig. 2

The photosynthetic parameters of leaves of three cultivars in two trellis systems from 2015 to 2017 *indicates significant difference between T-trellis and V-trellis at P<0.05. The same as below"

Fig. 3

Thickness of shoots and standard error of shoot thickness of three cultivars in two trellis systems in 2014 and 2017"

Table 5

Leaf and canopy characteristics of three cultivars in two trellis systems"

品种
Cultivar
架式
Trellis system
叶幕高度
Canopy height
(cm)
叶幕长度
Canopy length
(cm)
叶幕厚度
Canopy thickness (cm)
叶幕体积
Canopy volume (cm3)
叶面积指数
Leaf area index
叶片叶绿素
Leaf chlorophyll contents (SPAD)
CX T 127.3±2.7 162.7±3.0 39.3±2.0 0.86±0.0 1.33±0.22 42.4±1.6
V 111.7±6.1 303.0±28.8 60.0±5.8* 2.0±0.3* 1.71±0.15 31.4±3.9
WHY T 111.0±8.5 177.7±29.0 52.0±4.0 1.0±0.2 2.05±0.23 44.9±0.6
V 114.7±2.4 202.7±30.0 58.7±7.2 1.4±0.3 1.78±0.03 49.1±1.8
XY T 94.3±1.9 328.0±17.4* 51.0±4.0 1.6±0.1 1.00±0.07 44.6±1.7
V 116.7±3.2* 234.7±25.9 73.0±10.4 1.9±0.1* 1.57±0.14* 44.0±0.9

Table 6

Disease index and incidence of Downy mildew and Powdery mildew on leaves of three cultivars in two trellis systems"

年份
Year
品种
Cultivar
架式
Trellis system
霜霉病Downy mildew 白粉病Powdery mildew
发病率Incidence (%) 病情指数Disease index 发病率Incidence (%) 病情指数Disease index
2016 CX T 7.79±2.56 0.87±0.28 7.78±5.21 0.86±0.58
V 2.48±1.32 0.28±0.15 16.00±8.19 2.22±1.16
WHY T 6.20±2.67 0.69±0.30 44.00±8.84 7.11±1.93
V 11.83±0.85 1.31±0.10 53.00±13.3 18.33±5.24
XY T 4.62±1.71 0.51±0.19 0 0
V 14.38±1.35* 1.94±0.40* 0 0
2017 CX T 15.93±8.49 2.14±0.97 33.33±6.15 9.63±4.42
V 46.67±8.03* 17.41±5.01* 33.33±10.5 10.37±5.57
WHY T 7.04±4.46 1.60±1.22 41.06±7.97* 10.49±4.02
V 36.67±8.82* 8.52±2.14* 16.67±5.58 4.07±2.00
XY T 1.67±1.67 0.56±0.56 14.58±6.78 4.40±2.55
V 30.00±0.00* 8.89±1.38* 23.33±3.33 5.56±1.25

Table 7

Fruit quality parameters of three cultivars in two trellis systems"

年份
Year
品种
Variety
架式
Trellis system
果穗重
Cluster weight (g)
单粒重
Berry weight (g)
横径
Berry width
纵径
Berry
length
可溶性固形物
Total soluble solids (°Brix)
可滴定酸
Titratable acidity (g·L-1)
固酸比
TSS/TA
2015 CX T 681±16* 8.0 2.39 2.45 15.6±0.2 4.75±0.02 32.8
V 480±38 7.3 2.25 2.43 15.3±0.6 4.48±0.02 34.2
WHY T 674±107 6.8 2.29 2.46 16.5±0.5 5.30±0.07 31.1
V 657±64 8.7 2.45 2.67 16.5±0.3 5.47±0.03 30.2
XY T 595±218 9.4 2.52 2.71 17.2±0.2 4.41±0.02 39.0
V 529±48 8.0 2.38 2.65 17.3±0.3 4.41±0.02 39.2
2016 CX T 497±37* 7.6 2.34 2.42 18.8±0.1 3.58±0.05 52.5
V 286±41 6.8 2.16 2.51 18.6±0.6 3.14±0.03 59.2*
WHY T 373±99 6.7 2.14 2.53 15.8±0.7 4.36±0.02 36.2
V 244±29 6.9 2.10 2.40 15.8±0.2 4.31±0.01 36.7
XY T 296±95 7.2 2.23 2.54 16.6±0.3 4.50±0.03 36.9
V 310±32 8.5 2.35 2.60 16.5±0.2 3.55±0.04 46.5*
2017 CX T 392±22 6.1 2.16 2.15 18.4±1.0 3.11±0.03* 59.2
V 480±32 7.0 2.27 2.30 18.3±0.4 2.53±0.11 72.3*
WHY T 369±58 7.0 2.25 2.41 15.3±0.4 3.56±0.01 43.0*
V 309±21 7.0 2.21 2.42 14.0±0.9 4.70±0.01* 29.8
XY T 363±35 7.1 2.23 2.39 18.0±0.4 3.51±0.03 51.3
V 384±23 6.9 2.22 2.33 17.3±0.6 3.62±0.11 47.8

Fig. 4

Comparison on berry total anthocyanins, flavnoid and proanthocyanidin of three cultivars under two trellis systems"

[1] 张国军, 王晓玥, 孙磊, 闫爱玲, 王慧玲, 任建成, 徐海英 . 大陆季风气候区葡萄树势调控理念与应对策略分析. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2016(3):30-33.
doi: 10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2016.03.006
ZHANG G J, WANG X Y, SUN L, YAN A L, WANG H L, REN J C, XU H Y . Grapevine vigor control theory and coping strategy for grape growing under mainland monsoon type climate. Sino-Overseas Grapevine and Wine, 2016(3):30-33. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2016.03.006
[2] KELLER M, TARARA J M, MILLS L J . Spring temperatures alter reproductive development in grapevines. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2010,16:445-454.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2010.00105.x
[3] 李华, 王华 . 中国葡萄酒. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学出版社, 2010: 26-29.
LI H, WANG H . Chinese Wine. Yangling: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University Press, 2010: 26-29. (in Chinese)
[4] WOLF T K, DRY P R, ILAND P G, BOTTING D, DICK J, KENNEDY U, RISTIC R . Response of Shiraz grapevines to five different training systems in the Barossa Valley, Australia. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2003,9:82-95.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2003.tb00257.x
[5] 张大鹏 . 叶幕PAR光能截留和分配对葡萄群体光合同化物库源关系的调控. 植物生态学报, 1995,19(4):302-310.
ZHANG D P . Regulating effects of canopy light (PAR) interception and distribution on photosynthate ‘sink-source’ relation in grapevine population with different canopy structures. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 1995,19(4):302-310. (in Chinese)
[6] 单守明, 平吉成, 王振平, 冯美, 王文举, 张亚红 . 不同架式对设施葡萄光合作用和果实品质的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2009,37(35):17801-17803.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2009.35.071
SHAN S M, PING J C, WANG Z P, FENG M, WANG W J, ZHANG Y H . Effect of different shaping modes on photosynthesis and quality of grape in greenhouse. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2009,37(35):17801-17803. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2009.35.071
[7] 杨晓盆, 翟秋喜, 张国强, 王跃进 . 不同架式温室葡萄冠位叶片及叶绿体结构的变化. 中国农学通报, 2007,27(3):332-335.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.03.073
YANG X P, ZHAI Q X, ZHANG G Q, WANG Y J . Studies on leaf microstructure and chloroplast ultrastructure of grapes in greenhouse for various trellis system and position. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007,27(3):332-335. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.03.073
[8] 高美英, 李换桃, 秦国新, 温鹏飞 . 架式和整枝方式对日光温室葡萄新梢生长的影响. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,30(6):533-535.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8151.2010.06.012
GAO M Y, LI H T, QIN G X, WEN P F . Studies of frame structures and pruning system on the spindling of grape in the greenhouse. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2010,30(6):533-535. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8151.2010.06.012
[9] JACKSON D I, LOMBARD P B . Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality-A review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1993,44:409-430.
[10] KLIEWER W M, DOKOOZLIAN N K . Leaf area/crop weight ratios of grapevines: Influence of fruit composition and wine quality. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2005,52:170-181.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2004.06.014
[11] 赵文东, 满丽婷, 孙凌俊, 高圣华, 赵海亮, 马丽, 郭修武 . 架式与负载量对晚红葡萄果实品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(11):241-244.
ZHAO W D, MAN L T, SUN L J, GAO S H, ZHAO H L, MA L, GUO X W . Effect of different trellis and fruit load on the fruit quality of red globe grape. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010,26(11):241-244. (in Chinese)
[12] TROUGHT M C T, NAYLOR A P, FRAMPTON C . Effect of row orientation, trellis type, shoot and bunch position on the variability of Sauvignon Blanc (Vitis vinifera L.) juice composition. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2017,23:240-250.
doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12275
[13] 廉国武 . 不同架式对红地球葡萄生长结果特性的影响. 山西果树, 2012(5):8-10.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-345X.2012.05.004
LIAN G W . Effect of different trellis system on the growth and fruiting characteristics of Red Globe grape. Shanxi Fruits, 2012(5):8-10. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-345X.2012.05.004
[14] 单守明, 杨恕玲, 王振平, 平吉成 . 不同架式对设施葡萄生长发育和主芽坏死的影响. 北方园艺, 2011(2):51-53.
SHAN S M, YANG S L, WANG Z P, PING J C . Effects of different shaping modes on grapevine growth, development and primary buds in greenhouse. Northern Horticulture, 2011(2):51-53. (in Chinese)
[15] 文旭, 边凤霞, 王富霞, 容新民 . 不同架式对四师67团酿酒葡萄生长发育和果实品质的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2015(33):60-61.
WEN X, BIAN F X, WANG F X, RONG X M . Effects of different tree form on the growth and fruit quality of wine grape at the four division 67 regiment. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2015(33):60-61. (in Chinese)
[16] 周咏梅, 韩佳宇, 张劲, 成果, 谢太理 . 不同架式对桂葡6号葡萄树体生长及果实品质的影响. 中国南方果树, 2018,47(1):101-103.
ZHOU Y M, HAN J Y, ZHANG J, CHENG G, XIE T L . Effects of different trellis systems on grapevine growth and fruit quality of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Guipu No.6. South China Fruits, 2018,47(1):101-103. (in Chinese)
[17] 张军贤, 张振文 . 架式与新梢留量对赤霞珠葡萄酒中单体酚的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010,43(18):3784-3790.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.18.012
ZHANG J X, ZHANG Z W . Effects of trellis systems and shoot density on free phenol of wine from Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet sauvignon. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010,43(18):3784-3790. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.18.012
[18] 李建华, 粟周群, 潘玉英 . 不同架式对紫秋等葡萄品种栽培性状的影响. 中国南方果树, 2017,46(1):107-110.
doi: 10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20160348
LI J H, SU Z Q, PAN Y Y . Effects of trellis systems on viticultural practices of two grapvine cultivars. South China Fruits, 2017,46(1):107-110. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20160348
[19] 陆贵峰, 黄凤珠, 廖慧茜, 彭宏祥, 秦献泉, 林玲, 李冬波, 李鸿莉, 徐宁, 朱建华 . 两种架形对酿酒葡萄凌丰生长及产量的影响. 南方农业学报, 2017,48(5):866-869.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.05.018
LU G F, HUANG F Z, LIAO H Q, PENG H X, QIN X Q, LIN L, LI D B, LI H L, XU N, ZHU J H . Effects of V and T trellis on growth and yield of wine grape variety Lingfeng. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2017,48(5):866-869. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.05.018
[20] 李道德, 杨会芳 . 葡萄电杆式“T”形架效果好. 科学种养, 2008(7):20.
LI D D, YANG H F . A good trellis system for grapevine growing: T-trellis. Kexuezhongyang, 2008(7):20. (in Chinese)
[21] 贺普超, 程国利 . 酿酒葡萄不同整形方式的研究. 果树科学, 1994,11(1):14-18.
HE P C, CHENG G L . Studies of different training systems on wine grapes. Journal of Fruit Science, 1994,11(1):14-18. (in Chinese)
[22] 李玉鼎, 张光弟, 马金萍 . 埋土防寒区篱架酿酒葡萄斜干水平式新树形. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2006(6):25-27.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7360.2006.06.007
LI Y D, ZHANG G D, MA J P . A new training system for wine grapes in soil-bury areas: inclined trunk with horizontal cordons. Sino-Overseas Grapevine and Wine, 2006(6):25-27. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7360.2006.06.007
[23] 何娟, 王平, 段长青, 管雪强, 雷玉娟, 吴敏 . 顺架龙干形整形方式对“红地球”葡萄结果性状和树体营养的影响. 北方园艺, 2014(21):16-19.
HE J, WANG P, DUAN C Q, GUAN X Q, LEI Y J, WU M . Effects of inclined trunk with horizontal cordons on fruiting characteristics and vine nutrition reserve of red globe grape. Northern Horticulture, 2014(21):16-19. (in Chinese)
[24] LAMBERT R J, SKANDAMIS P N, COOTE P J, NYCHAS G J . A study of the minimum inhibitory concentration and mode of action of oregano essential oil, thymol and carvacrol. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2001,91(3):453-462.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01428.x pmid: 11556910
[25] 杨夫臣, 吴江, 程建徽, 徐凯, 陈俊伟 . 葡萄果皮花色素的提取及其理化性质. 果树学报, 2007,24(3):287-292.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2007.03.006
YANG F C, WU J, CHENG J H, XU K, CHEN J W . Studies on extraction and physical-chemical properties of anthocyanin from red globe grape peel. Journal of Fruit Science, 2007,24(3):287-292. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2007.03.006
[26] RAMCHANDANI A G, CHETTIYAR R S, PAKHALE S S . Evaluation of antioxidant and anti-initiating activities of crude polyphenolic extracts from seedless and seeded Indian grapes. Food Chemistry, 2010,119(1):298-305.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.06.032
[27] 代红军, 秦晨亮, 丁玲 . 水杨酸对‘赤霞珠’葡萄总类黄酮、白藜芦醇含量及相关酶活性的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2016,21(7):37-42.
DAI H J, QIN C L, DING L . Effects of salicylic acid on the contents of total flavonoids and resveratrol and related enzyme activities in ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016,21(7):37-42. (in Chinese)
[28] JAYASENA V, CAMERON I . Brix/acid ratio as a predictor of consumer acceptability of Crimson Seedless table grapes. Journal of Food Quality, 2008,31:736-750.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.2008.00231.x
[29] CRISOSTO C H, CRISOSTO G M . Understanding American and Chinese consumer acceptance of ‘Red Globe’ table grapes. Postharvest Biological Technology, 2002,24(2):155-162.
doi: 10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00189-2
[30] PERCIVAL D C, FISHER K H, SULLIVAN J A . Use of fruit zone leaf removal with Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling grapevines. I. Effect on canopy structure, microclimate, bud survival, shoot density, and vine vigor. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1994,45:123-132.
doi: 10.0000/PMID313
[31] 黄海华 . 高干“T”型架和简易避雨栽培巨峰葡萄技术. 现代园艺, 2006(5):16-17.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0584.2006.02.022
HUANG H H . Application of T-trellis system and rain-shelter cultivation on ‘Kyoho’. Modern Horticulture, 2006(5):16-17. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0584.2006.02.022
[32] 李晓梅, 唐晓萍, 董志刚, 谭伟, 于静, 王新平 . 葡萄生产上几种常见架式及其应用. 山西果树, 2015(2):36-38.
LI X M, TANG X P, DONG Z G, TAN W, YU J, WANG X P . Popular grapevine trellis systems and their application in commercial vineyards. Shanxi Fruits, 2015(2):36-38. (in Chinese)
[33] GARDEA A A, NORIEGA J R, OROZCO J A, GARCÍA- BANUELOS M, CARVAJAL-MILLÁN E, VALENZUELA-SOTO E M, VALENZUELA A A . Advanced maturity of ‘Perlette’ table grapes by training systems which increase foliage exposure to sunlight. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 2008,31(1):27-33.
[34] 王莉娜, 袁维祥, 杨敦敦 . 葡萄省工栽培新架式—高“Y”型平棚架. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2010(7):56-57.
WANG L N, YUAN W X, YANG D D . A new labor saving trellis system: Y shaped pergola. Sino-Overseas Grapevine and Wine, 2010(7):56-57. (in Chinese)
[35] 熊其仁, 蔡伟 . 栽培新设施—小棚简易避雨T型架. 农技服务, 2004(5):20.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8421.2004.05.014
XIONG Q R, CAI W . A new viticultural facility: T trellis with rain-shelter cultivation. Nongjifuwu, 2004(5):20. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8421.2004.05.014
[36] 赵海亮, 赵文东, 孙凌俊, 高圣华, 马丽, 刘晓菊 . 不同架式巨峰葡萄光合特性与叶绿素荧光参数研究. 西南农业学报, 2015,28(6):2691-2695.
doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2015.06.063
ZHAO H L, ZHAO W D, SUN L J, GAO S H, MA L, LIU X J . Study on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Kyoho grape in different trellis. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015,28(6):2691-2695. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2015.06.063
[37] SCHUBERT A, RESTAGNO M, NOVELLO V, PETERLUNGER E . Effects of shoot orientation on growth, net photosynthesis, and hydraulic conductivity of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cortese. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1995,46:324-328.
doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(94)00735-X
[38] 晁无疾, 张伟, 姚林启 . 不同修剪方式对红地球葡萄成花效应的影响. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2009(1):31-33.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7360.2009.01.008
CHAO W J, ZHANG W, YAO L Q . Effects of different pruning methods on flower initiation of red globe grape. Sino-Overseas Grapevine and Wine, 2009(1):31-33. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7360.2009.01.008
[39] NELSON K E, SCHUTZ H G, AHMEDULLAH M, MCPHERSON J . Flavour preferences of supermarket customers for ‘Thompson Seedless’ grapes. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1973,24(1):31-40.
[40] 张磊, 张晓煜, 亢艳莉, 马国飞, 袁海燕 . 土壤肥力对酿酒葡萄品质的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2008(2):226-229, 234.
ZHANG L, ZHANG X Y, KANG Y L, MA G F, YUAN H Y . The effect of soil fertility on wine grape quality. Acta Agriculturae Univeristatis Jiangxiensis, 2008(2):226-229, 234. (in Chinese)
[41] 白世践, 李超, 蔡军社, 赵荣华, 陈光 . 吐鲁番地区新征集葡萄资源果实主要品质性状的因子分析和聚类分析. 西北农业学报, 2016,25(7):1006-1016.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2016.07.008
BAI S J, LI C, CAI J S, ZHAO R H, CHEN G . Principal factor analysis and Euclidean cluster diagram of new grape cultivars’ quality traits in Turpan area. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2016,25(7):1006-1016. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2016.07.008
[42] NELSON K E, BAKER G A, WINKLER A J, AMERINE M A, RICHARDSON H B, JONES F R . Chemical and sensory variability in table grapes. Hilgardia, 1963,34:1-42.
doi: 10.3733/hilg.v34n01p001
[43] ELTOM M, TROUGHT M C T, AGNEW R, PARKER A, WINEFIELD C S . Pre-budburst temperature influences the inner and outer arm structure, phenology, flower number, fruit set, TSS accumulation and variability of Vitis vinifera L. Sauvignon Blanc bunches. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2017,23:280-286.
[44] DOKOOZLIAN N K . Grape berry growth and development. //Christensen L P. ed. Raisin Production Manual. Oakland: University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources Communication Services, 2002: 30-37.
[45] BERGQVIST J, DOKOOZLIAN N K, EBISUDA N . Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the central san joaquin valley in California. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2001,52(1):1-7.
doi: 10.1016/S0065-2911(01)45006-5
[46] 左玉 . 多酚类化合物研究进展. 粮食与油脂, 2013,26(4):6-10.
ZUO Y . Research progress on polyphenols. Cereals and Oils, 2013,26(4):6-10. (in Chinese)
[47] XIA L L, XU C M, HUANG K L, LU J, ZHANG Y L . Evaluation of phenolic compounds, antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of 31 grape cultivars with different genotypes. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2018. doi: org/10.1111/jfbc.12626.
doi: 10.1111/jfbc.12626
[48] PALLIOTTI A . A new closing Y-shaped training system for grapevines. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2012,18:57-63.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2011.00171.x
[49] 沈甜, 单守明, 孙晔, 李映龙, 张军翔 . “厂字”架式对“赤霞珠”葡萄光合效率和果实品质的影响. 北方园艺, 2015(1):27-30.
doi: 10.11937/bfyy.201501007
SHEN T, SHAN S M, SUN Y, LI Y L, ZHANG J X . The effect of Chang trellis system on photosynthetic efficiency and fruit quality of Cabernet Sauvignon. Northern Horticulture, 2015(1):27-30. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11937/bfyy.201501007
[1] ZHANG KeKun,CHEN KeQin,LI WanPing,QIAO HaoRong,ZHANG JunXia,LIU FengZhi,FANG YuLin,WANG HaiBo. Effects of Irrigation Amount on Berry Development and Aroma Components Accumulation of Shine Muscat Grape in Root-Restricted Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 129-143.
[2] LÜ XinNing,WANG Yue,JIA RunPu,WANG ShengNan,YAO YuXin. Effects of Melatonin Treatment on Quality of Stored Shine Muscat Grapes Under Different Storage Temperatures [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1411-1422.
[3] GUO ZeXi,SUN DaYun,QU JunJie,PAN FengYing,LIU LuLu,YIN Ling. The Role of Chalcone Synthase Gene in Grape Resistance to Gray Mold and Downy Mildew [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1139-1148.
[4] WANG HuiLing, YAN AiLing, SUN Lei, ZHANG GuoJun, WANG XiaoYue, REN JianCheng, XU HaiYing. eQTL Analysis of Key Monoterpene Biosynthesis Genes in Table Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 977-990.
[5] SONG JiangTao,SHEN DanDan,GONG XuChen,SHANG XiangMing,LI ChunLong,CAI YongXi,YUE JianPing,WANG ShuaiLing,ZHANG PuFen,XIE ZongZhou,LIU JiHong. Effects of Artificial Fruit Thinning on Sugar and Acid Content and Expression of Metabolism-Related Genes in Fruit of Beni-Madonna Tangor [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4688-4701.
[6] WANG Bo,QIN FuQiang,DENG FengYing,LUO HuiGe,CHEN XiangFei,CHENG Guo,BAI Yang,HUANG XiaoYun,HAN JiaYu,CAO XiongJun,BAI XianJin. Difference in Flavonoid Composition and Content Between Summer and Winter Grape Berries of Shine Muscat Under Two-Crop-a-Year Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4473-4486.
[7] LIU Xin,ZHANG YaHong,YUAN Miao,DANG ShiZhuo,ZHOU Juan. Transcriptome Analysis During Flower Bud Differentiation of Red Globe Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4020-4035.
[8] MA YuQuan,WANG XiaoLong,LI YuMei,WANG XiaoDi,LIU FengZhi,WANG HaiBo. Differences in Nutrient Absorption and Utilization of 87-1 Grape Variety Under Different Rootstock Facilities [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3822-3830.
[9] WAN LianJie,HE Man,LI JunJie,TIAN Yang,ZHANG Ji,ZHENG YongQiang,LÜ Qiang,XIE RangJin,MA YanYan,DENG Lie,YI ShiLai. Effects of Partial Substitution of Chemical Fertilizer by Organic Fertilizer on Ponkan Growth and Quality as well as Soil Properties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 2988-3001.
[10] JI XiaoHao,LIU FengZhi,WANG BaoLiang,LIU PeiPei,WANG HaiBo. Genetic Variation of Alcohol Acyltransferase Encoding Gene in Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2797-2811.
[11] YANG ShengDi,MENG XiangXuan,GUO DaLong,PEI MaoSong,LIU HaiNan,WEI TongLu,YU YiHe. Co-Expression Network and Transcriptional Regulation Analysis of Sulfur Dioxide-Induced Postharvest Abscission of Kyoho Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2214-2226.
[12] HAN Xiao, YANG HangYu, CHEN WeiKai, WANG Jun, HE Fei. Effects of Different Rootstocks on Flavonoids of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tannat Grape Fruits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(10): 2013-2025.
[13] XU XianBin,GENG XiaoYue,LI Hui,SUN LiJuan,ZHENG Huan,TAO JianMin. Transcriptome Analysis of Genes Involved in ABA-Induced Anthocyanin Accumulation in Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(1): 134-151.
[14] LIU Chuang,GAO Zhen,YAO YuXin,DU YuanPeng. Functional Identification of Grape Potassium Ion Transporter VviHKT1;7 Under Salt Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1952-1963.
[15] XuXian XUAN,ZiLu SHENG,ZhenQiang XIE,YuQing HUANG,PeiJie GONG,Chuan ZHANG,Ting ZHENG,Chen WANG,JingGui FANG. Function Analysis of vvi-miR172s and Their Target Genes Response to Gibberellin Regulation of Grape Berry Development [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1199-1217.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!