Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (9): 1952-1963.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.09.012

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Functional Identification of Grape Potassium Ion Transporter VviHKT1;7 Under Salt Stress

LIU Chuang(),GAO Zhen,YAO YuXin,DU YuanPeng()   

  1. College of Horticultural Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong
  • Received:2020-07-30 Accepted:2020-10-14 Online:2021-05-01 Published:2021-05-10
  • Contact: YuanPeng DU E-mail:18364030521@163.com;duyuanpeng001@163.com

Abstract:

【Objective】The aim of this study was to explore the role of VviHKT1;7 in the salt tolerance mechanism of grapes, so as to provide a theoretical reference for the subsequent cultivation of new salt-tolerant varieties. 【Method】DANMAN and MEGA software were used to analyze the biological information of VviHKT. The strongly salt resistant rootstocks SA15, SA17 and the commonly used rootstock 1103P tissue cultured seedlings were used as materials. Seedlings were treated under 100 mmol·L-1 NaCl for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 h, and the corresponding time of water treatment were taken as control. Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to detect the relative expression of HKT1 in the roots of grapes. VviHKT1;7 was cloned from SA17 cDNA and then linked with pRI101-AN-GFP, and the inflorescence of Arabidopsis thaliana was infected by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Subsequently, T3 homozygous lines were screened out from resistant MS plates. Wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis seeds were sowed on MS plates and MS plates (150 mmol·L-1NaCl added), their germination and growth were observed, and the root length and fresh weight were counted. The SA17 transgenic grape roots were obtained by Agrobacterium rhizogenes technology. After being treated with 100 mmol·L-1NaCl for 24 hours, the NMT in vivo physiological detector based on non-damaging micro-measurement technology was used to detect the net flow of Na+ and K+ instantaneous flow under salt stress in the roots of wild-type and transgenic grapes. 【Result】Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree analysis showed that VviHKT had high homology, among which the VviHKT1;7 open reading frame sequence length was 1 380 bp and it was the closest to VviHKT1;6. Salt stress significantly induced the expression of HKT1 gene in three varieties of grapes. Among them, the relative expression of VviHKT1;7 was up-regulated, which was still increased after long-term stress. The relative expression of VviHKT1;7 reached the peak at 6 or 12 h under salt stress, and its relative expression in SA17 and SA15 was significantly higher than 1103P. Results of germination and growth experiments in Arabidopsis showed that there was no significant difference between wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis under normal conditions, but the germination rate, root length and fresh weight of transgenic Arabidopsis were significantly higher than those of wild type under salt stress. Fluorescence detection experiments showed that green fluorescence could be seen in the transgenic grape roots under fluorescence, rather than in the wild-type roots. Further, qRT-PCR results also showed that the relative expression of VviHKT1;7 in the transgenic grape roots was 20-folds higher than that in the wild-type roots. The results of ion flow rate detection showed that the net flow of Na + both in wild-type and transgenic roots showed efflux under normal conditions. Besides, no significant difference was found between wild-type and transgenic roots (208 and 205 pmol·cm-2·s-1) and the fluctuation range of ion flow rate in each time period was small. After salt stress, the Na+ net fluxes of them increased significantly, and the fluctuations in each time period also increased; the average net fluxes of wild-type and transgenic roots were 1 053 and 1 340 pmol·cm-2·s-1, respectively. Under normal conditions, the K+ absorption and efflux of the two roots were in a dynamic equilibrium. Salt stress significantly induced K+ efflux, and the efflux of K+in transgenic roots was significantly smaller than that in the wild type, which were 406 and 952 pmol·cm-2·s-1, respectively. The results indicated that the ability of removing Na+ and keeping K+ of transgenic roots was significantly greater than that of wild type. 【Conclusion】VviHKT1;7 played an important role in the response of grapes to salt stress, and the overexpression of this gene could improve the adaptability of Arabidopsis and grape roots under salt stress.

Key words: grape, VviHKT1, 7, salt stress, transgene, functional identification

Table 1

Primers used for gene amplification and quantification"

基因名称 Gene name 引物序列 Primer sequence 用途 Purpose
VvActin F: 5′-TCTCAACCCAAAGGCTAATC-3′
R: 5′-GCATAGAGGGAAAGAACAGC-3′
qRT-PCR
VviHKT1;1 F: 5′-ATAGATGGTGGTGAAAAGGCT-3′
R: 5′-GTTGTGATAACAGTAGATGCTCC-3′
qRT-PCR
VviHKT1;2 F:5′-TGAGAGAGACAAGATGAGGGAAG-3′
R:5′-ACAAATCCATACCAGGCGTC-3′
qRT-PCR
VviHKT1;3 F:5′-GAGCATCGCCCTGGAAGTC-3′
R:5′-TGCCGAGAACAGTGATACCC-3′
qRT-PCR
VviHKT1;6 F:5′-AAATGGAGTGACGAGGGGA-3′
R:5′-TAGCCTTCAGACTTTGCCTC-3′
qRT-PCR
VviHKT1;7 F:5′-CCATCTTCATCATCCTTATCTGC-3′
R:5′-CTCTACCCAACTATTAATCCCGG-3′
qRT-PCR
VviHKT1;7 F:5′-ATGATGAACTCTGCTAGTTTCACC-3′
R:5′-AAAGCCCCTGATTACTTCTATCAC-3′
扩增基因
Amplified gene
VviHKT1;8 F:5′-CTTGTAAGTTGTAACCGAGGCA-3′
R:5′-CATGCATTGTGGATAGCTAAGG-3′
qRT-PCR

Fig. 1

Alignment of grape HKT protein sequence"

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree analysis of VviHKT and other species HKT"

Fig. 3

Expression analysis of HKT in roots of different lines after salt stress"

Fig. 4

PCR amplification of the full length of the coding region of VviHKT1;7"

Fig. 5

Germination of wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis seeds A: Germination status of Arabidopsis seeds after one week on MS plate; B: Germination of Arabidopsis seeds on MS plate with 150 mmol·L-1 NaCl added for one week; C: Statistics of germination rate after NaCl stress. ** indicates extremely significant difference (P<0.01); WT stands for wild type, OE-1, OE-2, and OE-3 stand for different transgenic lines. The same as below"

Fig. 6

Growth analysis of wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis after salt stress * indicates significant difference (P<0.05)"

Fig. 7

Detection of grape transgenic roots A: Fluorescence detection of transgenic roots; B: Quantitative detection of transgenic roots"

Fig. 8

Net Na+ flux detection A: The test site of root ion flow; B: Net Na+ flux detection of wild-type and transgenic grape roots; C: Na+ average net flux"

Fig. 9

Net K+ flux detection of wild-type and transgenic grape roots"

[1] JAMES R A, BLAKE C, BYRT C S, MUNNS R. Major genes for Na+ exclusion, Nax1 and Nax2 (wheat HKT1;4 and HKT1;5), decrease Na+ accumulation in bread wheat leaves under saline and waterlogged conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011,62(8):2939-2947.
[2] 刘俊, 晁无疾, 亓桂梅, 刘寅喆, 汉瑞峰. 蓬勃发展的中国葡萄产业. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2020(1):1-8.
LIU J, CHAO T J, Qi G M, QI G M, LIU Y Z, HAN Y F. Booming development of Chinese grape industry. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2020(1):1-8. (in Chinese)
[3] MAAS E V, HOFFMAN G J. Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 1977,103(2):115-134.
[4] CHINNUSAMY V, ZHU J H, ZHU J K. Salt stress signaling and mechanisms of plant salt tolerance. Genetic Engineering, 2006,27:141-177.
[5] DEINLEIN U, STEPHAN A B, HORIE T, LUO W, XU G H, SCHROEDER J I. Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends in Plant Science, 2014,19(6):371-379.
[6] NEUMANN P M. Chapter 2-recent advances in understanding the regulation of whole-plant growth inhibition by salinity, drought and colloid stress. Advances in Botanical Research, 2011,57:33-48.
[7] 秦玲, 康文怀, 齐艳玲, 蔡爱军. 盐胁迫对酿酒葡萄叶片细胞结构及光合特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(20):4233-4241.
QIN L, KANG W H, QI Y L, CAI A J. Effects of salt stress on mesophyll cell structures and photosynthetic characteristics in leaves of wine grape (Vitis spp.). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012,45(20):4233-4241. (in Chinese)
[8] BABY T, COLLINS C, TYERMAN S D, GILLIHAM M. Salinity negatively affects pollen tube growth and fruit set in grapevines and cannot be ameliorated by silicon. American Journal of Enology & Viticulture, 2016,67(2):218-228.
[9] WALKER R R, CLINGELEFFER P R. Rootstock attributes and selection for Australian conditions. Australian Viticulture, 2009,13(4):70-76.
[10] 李晨, 李秀杰, 韩真, 刘莉萍, 李勃. 非生物胁迫对葡萄光合作用的影响研究进展. 山东农业科学, 2017,49(12):144-148.
LI C, LI X J, HAN Z, LIU L P, LI B. Research advances on effects of abiotic stress on photosynthesis of grape. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2017,49(12):144-148. (in Chinese)
[11] WALKER R R, BLACKMORE D H, CLINGELEFFER P R, CORRELL R L. Rootstock effects on salt tolerance of irrigated field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultana) 2. Ion concentrations in leaves and juice. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2004,10(2):90-99.
[12] STEVENS R M, HARVEY G, PARTINGTON D L. Irrigation of grapevines with saline water at different growth stages: Effects on leaf, wood and juice composition. Australian Journal of Grape & Wine Research, 2011,17(2):239-248.
[13] FRANCISCO R, WALTER G, JULIAN I S. Sodium-driven potassium uptake by the plant potassium transporter HKT1 and mutations conferring salt tolerance. Science, 1995,270(5242):1660-1663.
[14] UOZUMI N, KIM E J, RUBIO F, YAMAGUCHI T, MUTO S, TSUBOI A, BAKKER E P, NAKAMURA T, SCHROEDER J I. The Arabidopsis HKT1 gene homolog mediates inward Na+ currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes and Na+ uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Physiology, 2000,122(4):1249-1259.
[15] HORIE T, YOSHIDA K, NAKAYAMA H, YAMADA K, OIKI S, SHINMYO A. Two types of HKT transporters with different properties of Na+ and K+ transport in Oryza sativa. The Plant Journal, 2001,27(2):129-138.
[16] GARCIADEBLÁS B, SENN M E, BAÑUELOS M A, RODRĺGUEZ- NAVARRO A. Sodium transport and HKT transporters: The rice model. Plant Journal, 2003,34(6):788-801.
[17] MASER P, ECKELMAN B, VAIDYANATHAN R, HORIE T, FAIRBAURN D J, KUBO M, YAMAGAMI M, YAMAGUCHI K, NISHIMURA M, UOZUMI N, ROBERYSON W, SUSSMAN M R, SCHROEDER J I. Altered shoot/root Na+ distribution and bifurcating salt sensitivity in Arabidopsis by genetic disruption of the Na+ transporter AtHKT1. FEBS Letters, 2002,531(2):157-161.
[18] SCHACHTMAN D P, SCHROEDER J I. Structure and transport mechanism of a high-affinity potassium uptake transporter from higher plants. Nature, 1994,370(6491):655-658.
[19] WATERS S, GILLIHAM M, HRMOVA M. Plant high-affinity potassium (HKT) transporters involved in salinity tolerance: structural insights to probe differences in ion selectivity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2013,14(4):7660-7680.
[20] BEZOUW R F H M V, JANSSEN E M, ASHRAFUZZAMAN M, GHAHRAMANZADEH R, KILIAN B, GRANER A, VISSER R G F, VAN DER LINDEN C G. Shoot sodium exclusion in salt stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is determined by allele specific increased expression of HKT1;5. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2019,241:153029.
[21] SUZUKI K, YAMAJI N, COSTA A, OKUMA E, KOBAYASHI N I, KASHIWAGI T, KATSUHARA M, WANG C, TANOI K, MURATA Y, SCHROEDER J I, MA J F, HORIE T. OsHKT1;4-mediated Na+ transport in stems contributes to Na+ exclusion from leaf blades of rice at the reproductive growth stage upon salt stress. BMC Plant Biology, 2016,16(1):22.
[22] WANG L, LIU Y H, LI D, FENG S J, YANG J W, ZHANG J J, ZHANG J L, WANG D, GAN Y T. Improving salt tolerance in potato through overexpression of AtHKT1 gene. BMC Plant Biology, 2019,19(1):357.
[23] 付晴晴. ‘左山一’杂交砧木株系耐盐评价及钠离子吸收分配特征研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2018.
FU Q Q. Salt tolerance identification and mechanism of hybrid rootstocks from ‘Zuo Shan 1’[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[24] WANG F P, ZHAO P P, ZHANG L, ZHAI H, DU Y P. Functional characterization of WRKY46 in grape and its putative role in the interaction between grape and phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae). Horticulture Research, 2019,6(1):803-814.
[25] 高海波, 张淑静, 沈应柏. 灰斑古毒蛾口腔反吐物诱导沙冬青细胞Ca2+内流及H2O2积累. 生态学报, 2012,32(20):6520-6526.
GAO H B, ZHANG S J, SHEN Y B. Regurgitant from Orgyia ericae Germar induces calcium influx and accumulation of hydrogen peroxide in Ammopiptanthus mongolicus (Maxim. ex Kom.) Cheng f. cells. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(20):6520-6526. (in Chinese)
[26] ZHU J K. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2003,6(5):441-445.
[27] HAMAMOTO S, HORIE T, HAUSER F, DEINLEIN U, SCHROEDER J, UOZUMI N. HKT transporters mediate salt stress resistance in plants: from structure and function to the field. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2015,32:113-120.
[28] HENDERSON S W, DUNLEVY J D, WU Y, BLACKMORE D H, WALKER R R, EDWARDS E J, GILLIHAM M, WALKER A R. Functional differences in transport properties of natural HKT1;1 variants influence shoot Na+ exclusion in grapevine rootstocks. The New Phytologist, 2018,217(3):1113-1127.
[29] HAUSER F, HORIE T. A conserved primary salt tolerance mechanism mediated by HKT transporters: A mechanism for sodium exclusion and maintenance of high K+/Na+ ratio in leaves during salinity stress Cell & Environment, 2010,33(4):552-565.
[30] WU Y, HENDERSON S W, WEGE S, ZHENG F, WALKER A R, WALKER R R, GILLIHAM M. The grapevine NaE sodium exclusion locus encodes sodium transporters with diverse transport properties and localisation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2020,246/247:153113.
[31] XU M, CHEN C H, CAI H, WU L. Overexpression of PeHKT1;1 improves salt tolerance in Populus. Genes, 2018,9(10):475.
[32] MIAN A, OOMEN R J, LSAYENKOV S, SENTENAC H, MAATHUIS F J, VÉRY A A. Over-expression of an Na+ and K+ permeable HKT transporter in barley improves salt tolerance. Plant Journal, 2011,68(3):468-479.
[33] GUO Q, MENG S, TAO S C, FENG J, FAN X Q, XU P, XU Z Z, SHEN X L. Overexpression of a samphire high-affinity potassium transporter gene SbHKT1 enhances salt tolerance in transgenic cotton. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2020,42(3):36.
[34] ROMERO-ARANDA M R, GONZÁLEZ-FERNÁNDEZ P, PÉREZ- TIENDA J R, LÓPEZ-DIAZ M R, ESPINOSA J, GRANUM E, TRAVERSO J Á, PINEDA B, GARCIA-SOGO B, MORENO V, ASINS M J, BELVER A. Na+ transporter HKT1;2 reduces flower Na+ content and considerably mitigates the decline in tomato fruit yields under saline conditions. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020,154:341-352.
[1] ZHANG KeKun,CHEN KeQin,LI WanPing,QIAO HaoRong,ZHANG JunXia,LIU FengZhi,FANG YuLin,WANG HaiBo. Effects of Irrigation Amount on Berry Development and Aroma Components Accumulation of Shine Muscat Grape in Root-Restricted Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 129-143.
[2] LÜ XinNing,WANG Yue,JIA RunPu,WANG ShengNan,YAO YuXin. Effects of Melatonin Treatment on Quality of Stored Shine Muscat Grapes Under Different Storage Temperatures [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1411-1422.
[3] GUO ZeXi,SUN DaYun,QU JunJie,PAN FengYing,LIU LuLu,YIN Ling. The Role of Chalcone Synthase Gene in Grape Resistance to Gray Mold and Downy Mildew [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1139-1148.
[4] WANG HuiLing, YAN AiLing, SUN Lei, ZHANG GuoJun, WANG XiaoYue, REN JianCheng, XU HaiYing. eQTL Analysis of Key Monoterpene Biosynthesis Genes in Table Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 977-990.
[5] WANG Bo,QIN FuQiang,DENG FengYing,LUO HuiGe,CHEN XiangFei,CHENG Guo,BAI Yang,HUANG XiaoYun,HAN JiaYu,CAO XiongJun,BAI XianJin. Difference in Flavonoid Composition and Content Between Summer and Winter Grape Berries of Shine Muscat Under Two-Crop-a-Year Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4473-4486.
[6] LIU Xin,ZHANG YaHong,YUAN Miao,DANG ShiZhuo,ZHOU Juan. Transcriptome Analysis During Flower Bud Differentiation of Red Globe Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4020-4035.
[7] MA YuQuan,WANG XiaoLong,LI YuMei,WANG XiaoDi,LIU FengZhi,WANG HaiBo. Differences in Nutrient Absorption and Utilization of 87-1 Grape Variety Under Different Rootstock Facilities [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3822-3830.
[8] JI XiaoHao,LIU FengZhi,WANG BaoLiang,LIU PeiPei,WANG HaiBo. Genetic Variation of Alcohol Acyltransferase Encoding Gene in Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2797-2811.
[9] YANG ShengDi,MENG XiangXuan,GUO DaLong,PEI MaoSong,LIU HaiNan,WEI TongLu,YU YiHe. Co-Expression Network and Transcriptional Regulation Analysis of Sulfur Dioxide-Induced Postharvest Abscission of Kyoho Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2214-2226.
[10] HAN Xiao, YANG HangYu, CHEN WeiKai, WANG Jun, HE Fei. Effects of Different Rootstocks on Flavonoids of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tannat Grape Fruits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(10): 2013-2025.
[11] XU XianBin,GENG XiaoYue,LI Hui,SUN LiJuan,ZHENG Huan,TAO JianMin. Transcriptome Analysis of Genes Involved in ABA-Induced Anthocyanin Accumulation in Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(1): 134-151.
[12] XuXian XUAN,ZiLu SHENG,ZhenQiang XIE,YuQing HUANG,PeiJie GONG,Chuan ZHANG,Ting ZHENG,Chen WANG,JingGui FANG. Function Analysis of vvi-miR172s and Their Target Genes Response to Gibberellin Regulation of Grape Berry Development [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1199-1217.
[13] PeiPei ZHU,YiJia LUO,Wen XIANG,MingLei ZHANG,JianXia ZHANG. Rescue and Molecular Marker Assisted-Selection of the Cold-Resistant Seedless Grape Hybrid Embryo [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1218-1228.
[14] ZHANG Lu,ZONG YaQi,XU WeiHua,HAN Lei,SUN ZhenYu,CHEN ZhaoHui,CHEN SongLi,ZHANG Kai,CHENG JieShan,TANG MeiLing,ZHANG HongXia,SONG ZhiZhong. Identification, Cloning, and Expression Characteristics Analysis of Fe-S Cluster Assembly Genes in Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 5068-5082.
[15] SUN Lei,WANG XiaoYue,WANG HuiLing,YAN AiLing,ZHANG GuoJun,REN JianCheng,XU HaiYing. The Influence of Rootstocks on the Growth and Aromatic Quality of Two Table Grape Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4405-4420.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!