施肥方法对小麦专用控释氮肥肥效的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.20.008

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 The objective of this study was to explore the suitable controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer varieties and their application methods in the wheat production process, so as to provide a theoretical basis for the popularization and application of the one-off mechanized application technology of wheat controlled-release fertilizer. 【Method】 Three dominant wheat producing areas with different soil types, fertility levels and climatic conditions in Shandong province were selected to study effects of different application methods of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer for wheat (surface broadcasting and rotary tillage (CRF1), banding below seeds (CRF2), and banding below and away from seeds (CRF3)) on wheat yield, nutrient absorption, soil nitrate nitrogen content and nitrogen use efficiency under the same optimal fertilization conditions by the method of field plot experiment. At the same time, the application methods were compared with the conventional urea fertilization (half urea was used as the base fertilizer, and half of urea was used at jointing of wheat (CK1), and all of urea was used as the base fertilizer by surface broadcasting and rotary tillage (CK2)) and no nitrogen fertilizer (CK0). 【Result】 The yield of wheat grown in Taian brown soil ranged from 7 021 to 7 683 kg·hm^-2, and the yields of CRF1 and CRF2 increased by 6.1% and 3.5% respectively compared with CK1, but the difference did not reach a significant level. The yield of CRF3 and CK1 was not significantly different, and the yield of CRF1 and CRF2 wheat was significantly higher than that of CK2, which increased by 9.4% and 6.7%, respectively. The yield of wheat grown in Chiping tidal soil ranged from 4 576 to 5 193 kg·hm^-2, and the yield of CRF1 and CK1 wheat was not significantly different, but significantly higher than that of CK2, with an increase of 11.3%. The yield of wheat treated with nitrogen fertilizer in the Huantai cinnamon soil ranged from 5 222 to 5 830 kg·hm^-2. The yield of CRF1, CRF2 and CRF3 had no significant difference with CK1, while the yield of CRF1 was significantly higher than that of CK2, with an increase of 10.8%. The wheat yield and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer of CRF1 were higher in all three sites, but there was no significant difference between CRF2 and CRF3. In Taian brown soil, the distribution rates of grain nitrogen of CRF1 and CRF3 were significantly higher than those of CK1 and CK2. The nitrogen use efficiency of CRF1, CRF2 and CRF3 in Huantai cinnamon soil was 46.7%, 49.5% and 50.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the three treatments, and no significant difference with CK1 and CK2. The three kinds of fertilization methods of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer had no significant effect on the distribution of dry matter in wheat grain and straw, the nitrogen content and accumulation of grain and the surplus of nitrogen. In Chiping and Huantai, the content of nitrate nitrogen of CRF2 and CRF3 in 0-90 cm soil layer was higher. The content of nitrate nitrogen under CK1 and CK2 in Taian was higher, while that under CRF1 was the lowest. 【Conclusion】 In the case of optimized dosage, the surface broadcasting and rotary tillage method for self-made wheat-specific controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer was conducive to stable or higher yield and production costs savings.

Key words: controlled-release fertilizer, fertilization methods, wheat, yield, nitrogen use efficiency, fertilizer placement

Ping LIU, DeShui TAN, Yu XU, HaiTao LIN, Yan LI, XiaoZong SONG, YuWen SHEN, ZhaoHui LIU. Effects of Fertilization Methods of Self-Made Wheat-Specific Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Fertilizer Efficiencies[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(20): 3897-3908.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.20.008

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2018/V51/I20/3897

Figures/Tables 9

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 1

Table 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 5

Table 6

References 38

[1]	赵斌, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 刘鹏. 控释肥对夏玉米产量和氮素积累与分配的影响. 作物学报, 2010, 36(10): 1760-1768. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01760
	ZHAO B, DONG S T, ZHANG J W, LIU P.Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on yield and nitrogen accumulation and distribution in summer maize.Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(10): 1760-1768. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01760
[2]	王贺. 华北平原砂质土壤夏玉米对肥料类型及施肥方法的响应研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012.
	WANG H.Summer maize response to fertilizer sources and their application methods in the sandy soils of North China Plain[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012. (in Chinese)
[3]	孙浩燕. 施肥方式对水稻根系生长、养分吸收及土壤养分分布的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2015.
	SUN H Y.Effects of fertilization methods on root growth, nutrition absorption of rice and soil nutrition distribution[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[4]	郑圣先, 聂军, 熊金英, 肖剑, 罗尊长, 易国英. 控释肥料提高氮素利用率的作用及对水稻效应的研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001, 7(1): 11-16. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2001.0102
	ZHENG S X, NIE J, XIONG J Y, XIAO J, LUO Z C, YI G Y.Study on role of controlled release fertilizer in increasing the efficiency of nitrogen utilization and rice yield.Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2001, 7(1): 11-16. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2001.0102
[5]	SUN H J, ZHANG H L, MIN J, FENG Y F, SHI W M.Controlled-release fertilizer, floating duckweed, and biochar affect ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emission from rice paddy fields irrigated with nitrogen-rich wastewater.Paddy and Water Environment, 2016, 14(1): 105-111. doi: 10.1007/s10333-015-0482-2
[6]	杨青林, 桑利民, 孙吉茹, 季志强, 袁文利, 郭玉炜, 盖颜欣. 我国肥料利用现状及提高化肥利用率的方法. 山西农业科学, 2011, 39(7): 690-692.
	YANG Q L, SANG L M, SUN J R, JI Z Q, YUAN W L, GUO Y W, GAI Y X.Current situation of fertilizer use in China and the method to improve chemical fertilizer utilization efficiency.Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(7): 690-692. (in Chinese)
[7]	HUANG S, LV W S, BLOSZIES S, SHI Q H, PAN X H, ZENG Y J.Effects of fertilizer management practices on yield-scaled ammonia emissions from croplands in China: A meta-analysis.Field Crops Research, 2016, 192: 118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.023
[8]	GILDOW M, ALOYSIUS N, GEBREMARIAM S, MARTIN J.Fertilizer placement and application timing as strategies to reduce phosphorus loading to Lake Erie.Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2016, 42(6): 1281-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.07.002
[9]	张学军, 赵营, 陈晓群, 吴礼树, 胡承孝. 滴灌施肥中施氮量对两年蔬菜产量、氮素平衡及土壤硝态氮累积的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(11): 2535-2545. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2007.11.019
	ZHANG X J, ZHAO Y, CHEN X Q, WU L S, HU C X.Effects of application of nitrogen on vegetable yield, nitrogen balance and soil nitrogen accumulation under two years’ drip fertigation.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(11): 2535-2545. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2007.11.019
[10]	PAN S G, WEN X C, WANG Z M, ASHRAF U, TIAN H, DUAN M Y, MO Z W, FAN P S, TANG X R.Benefits of mechanized deep placement of nitrogen fertilizer indirect-seeded rice in South China.Field Crops Research, 2017, 203: 139-149. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.011
[11]	白由路, 杨俐苹. 我国农业中的测土配方施肥. 中国土壤与肥料, 2006(2): 3-7.
	BAI Y L, YANG L P.Soil testing and fertilizer recommendation in Chinese agriculture.Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2006(2): 3-7. (in Chinese)
[12]	刘宁, 孙振涛, 韩晓日, 战秀梅, 杨劲峰. 缓/控释肥料的研究进展及存在问题. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(4): 1005-1009.
	LIU N, SUN Z T, HAN X R, ZHAN X M, YANG J F.Research progress and existing problems on slow/controlled release fertilizers.Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41(4): 1005-1009. (in Chinese)
[13]	张玉树, 丁洪, 卢春生, 李卫华, 陈磊. 控释肥料对花生产量、品质以及养分利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(4): 700-706. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2007.04.026
	ZHANG Y S, DING H, LU C S, LI W H, CHEN L.Effect of controlled release fertilizers on the yield and quality of peanut and nutrient use efficiency.Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007, 13(4): 700-706. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2007.04.026
[14]	杨俊刚, 张冬雷, 徐凯, 倪小会, 肖强, 曹兵, 刘宝存, 邹国元. 控释肥与普通肥料混施对设施番茄生长和土壤硝态氮残留的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(18): 3782-3791.
	YANG J G, ZHANG D L, XU K, NI X H, XIAO Q, CAO B, LIU B C, ZOU G Y.Effects of mixed application of controlled-release fertilizer and common fertilizers on greenhouse tomato growth, yield, root distribution, and soil nitrate residual.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(18): 3782-3791. (in Chinese)
[15]	ZVOMUYA F, ROSEN C J, RUSSELLE M P, GUPTA S C.Nitrate leaching and nitrogen recovery following application of polyolefin- coated urea to potato.Journal of Environmental Quality, 2003, 32(2): 480-489. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.0480 pmid: 12708671
[16]	HALVORSON A D, DEL GROSSO S J, REULE C A. Nitrogen, tillage, and crop rotation effects on nitrous oxide emissions from irrigated cropping systems.Journal of Environmental Quality, 2008, 37(4): 1337-1344. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007.0268 pmid: 18574163
[17]	戴建军, 樊小林, 喻建刚, 刘芳, 张桥. 水溶性树脂包膜控释肥料肥效期快速检测方法研究. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(5): 966-971.
	DAI J J, FAN X L, YU J G, LIU F, ZHANG Q.Longevity of controlled release modified resin fertilizer.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(5): 966-971. (in Chinese)
[18]	JOSé DA SILVA M, HENRIQUE C, FRANCO J, PAULO S, MAGALHãES G. Liquid fertilizer application to ratoon cane using a soil punching method.Soil & Tillage Research, 2017, 165: 279-285.
[19]	SU W, LIU B, LIU X, LI X, REN T, CONG R, LU J.Effect of depth of fertilizer banded-placement on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). European Journal of Agronomy, 2015, 62: 38-45.
[20]	BORGES R, MALLARINO A P.Grain yield, early growth, and nutrient uptake of no-till soybean as affected by phosphorus and potassium placement.Agronomy Journal, 2000, 92: 380-388.
[21]	PFAB H, PALMER I, BUEGGER F, FIEDLER S, MüLLER T, RUSER R. Influence of a nitrification inhibitor and of placed N-fertilization on N2O fluxes from a vegetable cropped loamy soil.Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2012, 150(3): 91-101.
[22]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D.Soil Agro-Chemistrical Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[23]	宋歌, 孙波, 教剑英. 测定土壤硝态氮的紫外分光光度法与其他方法的比较. 土壤通报, 2007, 44(2): 288-293.
	SONG G, SUN B, JIAO J Y.Comparison between ultraviolet spectrophotometry and other methods in determination of soil nitrate-N.Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2007, 44(2): 288-293. (in Chinese)
[24]	NYBORG M, MALHI S S, MUMEY G, PENNEY D C, LAVERTY D H.Economics of phosphorus fertilization of barley as influenced by concentration of extractable phosphorus in soil.Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 1999, 30(11/12): 1789-1795.
[25]	NUTTALL W F, BUTTON R G.The effect of deep banding N and P fertilizer on the yield of canola (Brassica napus L.) and spring wheat(Triticum aestivum L.). Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 1990, 70(4): 629-639.
[26]	EGHBALL B, MARANVILLE J W.Root development and nitrogen influx of corn genotypes grown under combined drought and nitrogen stresses.Agronomy Journal, 1962, 85(1): 147-152.
[27]	罗小娟, 冯淑怡, 石晓平, 曲福田. 太湖流域农户环境友好型技术采纳行为及其环境和经济效应评价—以测土配方施肥技术为例. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(11): 1891-1902.
	LUO X J, FENG S Y, SHI X P, QU F T.Farm households' adoption behavior of environment friendly technology and the evaluation of their environmental and economic effects in Taihu Basin—taking formula fertilization by soil testing technology as an example.Journal of Natural Resource, 2013, 28(11): 1891-1902. (in Chinese)
[28]	章明奎, 方利平. 砂质农业土壤养分积累和迁移特点的研究. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(2): 46-49.
	ZHANG M K, FANG L P.Accumulation and transport of nutrients in agricultural sandy soils.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(2): 46-49. (in Chinese)
[29]	NKEBIWE P M, WEINMANN M, BAR-TAL A, MüLLER T. Fertilizer placement to improve crop nutrient acquisition and yield: A review and meta-analysis.Field Crops Research, 2016, 196: 389-401.
[30]	刘永哲, 陈长青, 尚健, 王火焰, 周健民, 陈照明, 刘晓伟. 沙壤土包膜尿素释放期与小麦适宜施用方式研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(4): 905-912.
	LIU Y Z, CHEN C Q, SHANG J, WANG H Y, ZHOU J M, CHEN Z M, LIU X W.Release durations and suitable application patterns of coated urea on winter wheat in sandy loam soil.Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(4): 905-912. (in Chinese)
[31]	张务帅. 控释氮钾肥配比及施肥方式对玉米、小麦生长和土壤养分变化的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015.
	ZHANG W S.Effects of controlled release nitrogen and potassium fertilizers with ratios and application methods on growth of corn-wheat and soil nutrients[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[32]	郭新送, 丁方军, 孟庆羽, 陈士更, 路艳艳, 朱福军. 控释肥不同施用量及深度对宅基复垦地小麦产量与氮肥利用率的影响. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(4): 928-934.
	GUO X S, DING F J, MENG Q Y, CHEN S G, LU Y Y, ZHU F J.Effects of controlled-release fertilizer dosage and depth on wheat yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency in reclamation land.Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2016, 47(4): 928-934. (in Chinese)
[33]	邱新强, 高阳, 黄玲, 李新强, 孙景生, 段爱旺. 冬小麦根系形态形状及分布. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(11): 2211-2219.
	QIU X Q, GAO Y, HUANG L, LI X Q, SUN J S, DUAN A W.Temporal and spatial distribution of root morphology of winter wheat.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(11): 2211-2219. (in Chinese)
[34]	张杰, 王备战, 冯晓, 李国强, 赵巧丽, 胡峰, 郑国清. 氮肥调控对冬小麦干物质量、产量和氮素利用效率的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2014, 34(4): 516-520.
	ZHANG J, WANG B Z, FENG X, LI G Q, ZHAO Q L, HU F, ZHENG G Q.Effect of nitrogen fertilizer management on the dry matter quantity, yield and utilization in winter wheat.Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2014, 34(4): 516-520. (in Chinese)
[35]	许仙菊, 赵坚, 张维理, 张永春, 姚政. 不同轮作模式农田钾养分表观平衡及其对土壤速效钾含量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(3): 37-42.
	XU X J, ZHAO J, ZHANG W L, ZHANG Y C, YAO Z.Potassium nutrient balance and its impact on soil available K content in Shanghai suburb farmlands.Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2016(3): 37-42. (in Chinese)
[36]	王慧, 张民, 尹秀华, 付伟. 控释肥在黑麦草草坪中氮素淋失的研究. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(1): 64-67.
	WANG H, ZHANG M, YIN X H, FU W.Nitrogen leaching loss of controlled-release fertilizers on ryegrass turfgrass.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(1): 64-67. (in Chinese)
[37]	PARAMASIVAM S, ALVA A K.Leaching of nitrogen forms from controlled-release nitrogen fertilizers.Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1997, 28(17/18): 1663-1674.
[38]	杜建军, 毋永龙, 田吉林, 王益权, 崔英德. 控/缓释肥料减少氨挥发和氮淋溶的效果研究. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(2): 49-52.
	DU J J, WU Y L, TIAN J L, WANG Y Q, CUI Y D.Effect of several controlled/slow-release fertilizers on decreasing ammonia volatilization and N leaching.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(2): 49-52. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

试验地点 Test point	土壤类型 Soil type	质地 Soil texture	pH	有机质 Organic matter (g·kg^-1)	碱解氮 Hydrolysis N （mg·kg^-1）	有效磷 Available P (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾 Available K (mg·kg^-1)
茌平Chiping	潮土Fluvo-aquic soil	黏壤土 Clay loam	7.97	16.0	26.7	12.6	88.0
泰安Taian	棕壤 Brown soil	轻壤土Light loam	5.71	17.1	35.8	33.1	173.0
桓台Huantai	褐土 Cinnamon soil	壤土Loam	7.92	14.8	30.4	7.0	74.0

试验地点 Test point	养分投入量Nutrient input (kg·hm^-2)			播种量 Seeding rate (kg·hm^-2)	播种日期 Seeding date	收获日期 Harvest date
试验地点 Test point	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	播种量 Seeding rate (kg·hm^-2)	播种日期 Seeding date	收获日期 Harvest date
茌平Chiping	210	75	105	300	2012.10.27	2013.6.14
泰安Taian	225	105	75	180	2012.10.11	2013.6.16
桓台Huantai	180	105	60	120	2012.10.12	2013.6.13

试验地点 Test point	处理 Treatment	产量 Yield (kg·hm^-2)	分配率Distribution rate (%)
试验地点 Test point	处理 Treatment	产量 Yield (kg·hm^-2)	籽粒Grain	秸秆Straw
茌平 Chiping	CK1	5193a	36.7a	63.3a
	CK2	4576c	36.1a	63.9a
	CRF1	5093ab	37.9a	62.1a
	CRF2	4646c	34.9a	65.1a
	CRF3	4787bc	36.2a	63.8a
泰安 Taian	CK1	7242abc	43.3 a	56.7 b
	CK2	7021c	40.5 b	59.5a
	CRF1	7683a	42.9 ab	57.1 ab
	CRF2	7494ab	41.7 ab	58.3 ab
	CRF3	7181bc	43.7 a	56.3 a
桓台 Huantai	CK0	2437c	46. 7a	53.3a
	CK1	5830a	45. 7a	54.3a
	CK2	5222b	45.1a	54.9a
	CRF1	5787a	45.4a	54.6a
	CRF2	5624ab	45.8a	54.1a
	CRF3	5482ab	45.5a	54.5a

试验地点 Test point	处理 Treatment	氮素积累量Nitrogen accumulation (kg·hm^-2)		氮素分配Nitrogen distribution (%)
试验地点 Test point	处理 Treatment	籽粒Grain	秸秆Straw	籽粒Grain	秸秆Straw
茌平 Chiping	CK1	113.2a	43.1a	72.5a	27.5a
	CK2	102.6a	38.8a	72.6a	27.4a
	CRF1	109.4a	36.7a	74.9a	25.1a
	CRF2	102.0a	43.6a	70.0a	30.0a
	CRF3	109.1a	38.7a	73.9a	26.1a
泰安 Taian	CK1	213.9a	77.4b	73.5b	26.5b
	CK2	202.0a	75.1bc	72.9b	27.1b
	CRF1	214.1a	59.6d	78.2a	21.8c
	CRF2	207.9a	101.8a	67.0c	33.0a
	CRF3	185.4a	62.0cd	74.9ab	25.1bc
桓台 Huantai	CK0	37.3c	7.0c	84.2a	15.8b
	CK1	119.1a	27.0ab	81.5ab	18.5ab
	CK2	100.3b	23.2ab	81.2ab	18.8ab
	CRF1	114.1ab	21.9b	82.9ab	17.1ab
	CRF2	111.2ab	24.1ab	81.9ab	18.1ab
	CRF3	108.5ab	27.4a	79.6b	20.4a

试验地点 Test point	处理 Treatment	氮素投入 Nitrogen input (kg·hm^-2)	作物氮输出 Crop N output (kg·hm^-2)	土壤氮素表观平衡 Soil apparent N balance (kg·hm^-2)
茌平 Chiping	CK1	210	156.3a	53.7a
	CK2	210	141.4a	68.6a
	CRF1	210	146.2a	63.8a
	CRF2	210	145.6a	64.4a
	CRF3	210	147.8a	62.2a
泰安 Taian	CK1	225	291.3a	-66.3b
	CK2	225	277.1ab	-52.1ab
	CRF1	225	273.8ab	-48.8ab
	CRF2	225	309.7a	-84.7b
	CRF3	225	247.4b	-22.4a
桓台 Huantai	CK0	0	44.4c	-44.4c
	CK1	180	146.0a	34.0b
	CK2	180	123.6b	56.4a
	CRF1	180	127.7ab	52.3ab
	CRF2	180	132.9ab	47.1ab
	CRF3	180	134.1ab	45.9ab

Effects of Fertilization Methods of Self-Made Wheat-Specific Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Fertilizer Efficiencies

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 38

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

试验地点Test point	处理Treatment	0–30 cm	30–60 cm	60–90 cm
茌平 Chiping	CK1	14.3c	9.4a	5.2c
	CK2	15.0bc	11.6a	8.3ab
	CRF1	16.8abc	10.6a	7.5bc
	CRF2	18.3ab	12.5a	10.3a
	CRF3	19.0a	12.7a	9.0ab
泰安 Taian	CK1	8.6a	6.2a	4.4a
	CK2	7.3ab	5.9a	5.2a
	CRF1	4.9b	2.4b	1.4b
	CRF2	7.0ab	5.7a	4.6a
	CRF3	5.7b	4.3ab	2.9ab
桓台 Huantai	CK0	17.1bc	11.9c	11.5a
	CK1	20.7ab	15.5abc	11.9a
	CK2	17.7bc	12.9bc	12.3a
	CRF1	16.6c	12.7c	12.2a
	CRF2	18.7bc	17.2ab	12.7a
	CRF3	22.5a	17.5a	12.8a

[1]	CHEN JiHao, ZHOU JieGuang, QU XiangRu, WANG SuRong, TANG HuaPing, JIANG Yun, TANG LiWei, $\boxed{\hbox{LAN XiuJin}}$, WEI YuMing, ZHOU JingZhong, MA Jian. Mapping and Analysis of QTL for Embryo Size-Related Traits in Tetraploid Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 203-216.
[2]	ZHANG XiaoLi, TAO Wei, GAO GuoQing, CHEN Lei, GUO Hui, ZHANG Hua, TANG MaoYan, LIANG TianFeng. Effects of Direct Seeding Cultivation Method on Growth Stage, Lodging Resistance and Yield Benefit of Double-Cropping Early Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[3]	YAN YanGe, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, ZHAO BingQiang, YUAN Liang. Effects of Dextran Modified Urea on Winter Wheat Yield and Fate of Nitrogen Fertilizer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 287-299.
[4]	XU JiuKai, YUAN Liang, WEN YanChen, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, LI HaiYan, ZHAO BingQiang. Nitrogen Fertilizer Replacement Value of Livestock Manure in the Winter Wheat Growing Season [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[5]	WANG CaiXiang,YUAN WenMin,LIU JuanJuan,XIE XiaoYu,MA Qi,JU JiSheng,CHEN Da,WANG Ning,FENG KeYun,SU JunJi. Comprehensive Evaluation and Breeding Evolution of Early Maturing Upland Cotton Varieties in the Northwest Inland of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 1-16.
[6]	ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[7]	ZHANG Wei,YAN LingLing,FU ZhiQiang,XU Ying,GUO HuiJuan,ZHOU MengYao,LONG Pan. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield of Double Cropping Rice and Utilization Efficiency of Light and Heat Energy in Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 31-45.
[8]	ZHAO HaiXia,XIAO Xin,DONG QiXin,WU HuaLa,LI ChengLei,WU Qi. Optimization of Callus Genetic Transformation System and Its Application in FtCHS1 Overexpression in Tartary Buckwheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1723-1734.
[9]	XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[10]	LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[11]	GUO ShiBo,ZHANG FangLiang,ZHANG ZhenTao,ZHOU LiTao,ZHAO Jin,YANG XiaoGuang. The Possible Effects of Global Warming on Cropping Systems in China XIV. Distribution of High-Stable-Yield Zones and Agro-Meteorological Disasters of Soybean in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1763-1780.
[12]	WANG HaoLin,MA Yue,LI YongHua,LI Chao,ZHAO MingQin,YUAN AiJing,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui. Optimal Management of Phosphorus Fertilization Based on the Yield and Grain Manganese Concentration of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[13]	TANG HuaPing,CHEN HuangXin,LI Cong,GOU LuLu,TAN Cui,MU Yang,TANG LiWei,LAN XiuJin,WEI YuMing,MA Jian. Unconditional and Conditional QTL Analysis of Wheat Spike Length in Common Wheat Based on 55K SNP Array [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1492-1502.
[14]	GUI RunFei,WANG ZaiMan,PAN ShengGang,ZHANG MingHua,TANG XiangRu,MO ZhaoWen. Effects of Nitrogen-Reducing Side Deep Application of Liquid Fertilizer at Tillering Stage on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Fragrant Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[15]	LIAO Ping,MENG Yi,WENG WenAn,HUANG Shan,ZENG YongJun,ZHANG HongCheng. Effects of Hybrid Rice on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556.