Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2011, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (16): 3436-3445.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.16.017

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·RESOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Studies on Forage Potential and Mechanism of Maize and Alfalfa Intercropping System

ZHANG  Gui-Guo, YANG  Zai-Bin, DONG  Shu-Ting   

  1. 1. 山东农业大学动物科技学院
    2. 山东农业大学农学院/作物生物学国家重点实验室
  • Received:2010-08-20 Revised:2011-01-18 Online:2011-08-15 Published:2011-01-20

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of this study were to estimate the discrepancy of forage producing performance and the nutrients digestibility of different maize (Zea mays L.) and alfalfa(Medicago sativa L.) intercropping models, thus to provide a scientific basis for applying the intercropping of maize and alfalfa in practice. 【Method】 Four intercropping treatments, alternating alfalfa and maize rows according to 2﹕2, 3﹕2, 4﹕2, 5﹕2, were designed with three replicates for each. Maize and alfalfa sole crop were the control groups. By determining the forage dry matter and nutrients yields, nutrients digestibility, degradable nutrients yields, and rumen microorganism counts of sheep fed harvested alfalfa-maize mixtures from different intercropping groups, to evaluate the forage production potential and explore the mechanism. 【Result】 The results showed that the yields of dry matter, nutrients and utilizable nutrients of maize and alfalfa intercropping system and alfalfa sole crop were all significantly improved along with the advancing of establishing years (P<0.05); The yields of dry matter between each treatments had no significant difference (P>0.05); Compared with the maize sole crop, the intercropping system improved the output and digestibility of crude protein (CP) and the yield of degradable CP, additionally, a linearly response was observed with increasing proportion of alfalfa in intercropping; Compared with the alfalfa sole crop, the intercropping system enhanced the yields and digestibility of ether extract (EE), carbohydrate and gross energy, as well as the yields of corresponding utilizable nutrients; The increase of rumen microorganism counts contributed to the enhanced nutrients digestibility and rendered much more straws tissue cells to be digested in rumen, when the harvested mixtures from intercropping were used as ruminant diets. 【Conclusion】 The alfalfa and maize intercropping system have greater forage nutrients yields than alfalfa or corn monoculture, and improve the digestibility of nutrient and the output of utilizable nutrients, thus it is a viable culturing mode for higher forage production, therefore the result can provide a scientific reference for structuring the optimal ruminant forage producing system in the future.

Key words: alfalfa, maize, intercropping, forage potential, mechanism

[1] Leonard A, Maynard A B. Animal Nutrition (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1979.

[2] Willey R W. Intercropping-its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts, 1979, 32: 1-10.

[3] Sleugh B, Moore K J, George J R, Brummer E C. Binary legume-grass mixtures improve forage yield, quality, and seasonal distribution. Agronomy Journal, 2000, 92: 24-30.

[4] Strydhorst S M, King J R, Lopetinsky K J, Neil Harker K. Forage potential of intercropping barley with faba bean, lupin, or field pea. Agronomy Journal, 2008, 100(1): 184-190.

[5] Baron V S, Najda H G, Salmon D F, Dick A C. Postfl owering forage potential of spring and winter cereal mixtures. Canada Journal of Plant Science, 1992, 72: 137-145.

[6] Njoka-njirue E N, Njaruim M G, Abdulrazaks S A, Mureithi J G. Effect of intercropping herbaceous legumes with napier grass on dry matter yield and nutritive value of the feedstuffs in semi-arid region of eastern Kenya. Agricultura Tropical et Subtropica, 2006, 39(4): 255-267.

[7] Juskiw P E, Helm J H, Salmon D F. Forage yield and quality for monocrops and mixtures of small grain cereals. Crop Science, 2000, 40: 138-147.

[8] 陈玉香. 东北农牧交错带玉米生产与利用及农业生态系统优化生产模式[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2002.

Chen Y X. Maize production and utilizing in the eeotone between agriculture and animal husbandry in northeast China and agricultural ecosystem optimization model[D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2002. (in Chinese)

[9] 刘忠宽, 曹卫东, 秦文利, 智健飞, 刘振宇. 玉米-紫花苜蓿间作模式与效应研究. 草业学报, 2009,18(6): 158-163.

Liu Z K, Cao W D, Qin W L, Zhi J F, Liu Z Y. The study of pattern and effect of maize-alfalfa intercropping system. Acta prataculturae sinica, 2009, 18(6): 158-163. (in Chinese)

[10] 贾彩建, 李淑萍, 柳小红. 紫花苜蓿套种夏玉米粮草间作经济效益高. 作物杂志, 2004(4): 37-38.

Jia C J, Li S P, Liu X H. The higher economic profitability from alfalfa and maize intercropping. Crop Journal, 2004(4): 37-38. (in Chinese)

[11] 李显瑞, 于清军, 吴喜才, 叶  多, 张福成, 闫永双, 李彦民, 封亚田, 徐  义, 刘艳平, 薛建中, 李  中. 紫花苜蓿一玉米草粮间作应用效益分析. 草业科学, 1999,16(6): 23-25.

Li X R, Yu Q J, Wu X C, Ye D, Zhang F C, Yan Y S, Li Y M, Feng Y T, Xu Y, Liu Y P, Xue J Z, Li Z. The analysis of profitability of alfalfa and maize intercropping. Pratacultural Science, 1999, 16(6): 23-25. (in Chinese)

[12] Smith M A, Carter P R. Strip intercropping corn and alfalfa. Journal Production Agriculture, 1998, 11: 345-353.

[13] Waldo D R, Capuco A V, Jr Rexroad C E. Milk production of Holstein heifers fed either alfalfa or corn silage diets at two rates of daily gain. Journal of Dairy Science, 1998, 81: 756-764.

[14] Sindt J J, Drouillard J S, Titgemeyer E C, Montgomery S P, Coetzer C M, Farran T B, Pike J N, Higgins J J, Ethington R T. Wet corn gluten feed and alfalfa hay combinations in steam-flaked corn finishing cattle diets. Journal of Animal Science, 2003, 81: 3121-3129.

[15] Obitsu T, Goto M, Sugino T, Taniguchi K, Yukizane K, Imoto S, Yanagawa M, El-Sabagh M. The effect of dietary ratios of corn silage and alfalfa hay on carbohydrate digestion and retention time of feed particles in the gastrointestinal tract of steers. Journal of Animal Science, 2009, 80: 546-555.

[16] Brito A F, Broderick G A. Effect of varying dietary ratios of alfalfa silage to corn silage on production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2006, 89: 3924-3938.

[17] 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第二版). 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003.

Zhang L Y. The Analysis and Determine Technique of Feed (2nd ed.). Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press, 2003. (in Chinese)

[18] 张永根, 王志博, 宋  平. 黑龙江主要栽培禾本科牧草对奶牛营养价值评价. 草业科学, 2006, 23(9): 64-69.

Zhang Y G, Wang Z B, Song P. Nutritive evaluation of common grass forage crop for dairy cattle. Pratacultural Science, 2006, 23(9): 64-69. (in Chinese)

[19] 杨  凤. 动物营养学(第二版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2004.

Yang F. Animal Nutrition (2nd ed.). Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press, 2004. (in Chinese)

[20] 冯仰廉. 反刍动物营养学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.

Feng Y L. The Ruminant Nutrition. Beijing: Science Press, 2004. (in Chinese)

[21] Benchaar C, Petit H V, Berthiaume R, Ouellet D R, Chiquette J, Chouinard P Y. Effects of essential oils on digestion, ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial populations, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows fed alfalfa silage or corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 2007, 90: 886-897.

[22] 张永根. 瘤胃脲酶抑制剂氢醌对反刍动物作用的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2001.

Zhang Y G. Studies on roles of hydroquinone as urease inhibitor in ruminants[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2001. (in Chinese)

[23] Patra A K, Saxena J. Dietary phytochemicals as rumen modifiers: a review of the effects on microbial populations. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2009, 96: 363-375.

[24] Frey J C, Pell A N, Berthiaume R, Lapierre H, Lee S, Ha J K, Mendell J E, Angert E R. Comparative studies of microbial populations in the rumen, duodenum, ileum and faeces of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2009, 108(2010): 1982-1993.

[25] 周道玮, 孙海霞, 刘春龙, 赵春生. 中国北方草地畜牧业的理论基础问题. 草业科学, 2009, 26(11): 1-11.

Zhou D W, Sun H X, Liu C L, Zhao C S. The basic theoretics of pasture farming in north china, Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(11): 1-11. (in Chinese)

[26] Shirley M, Jane R. Forage potential of intercropping berseem clover with barley, oat, or triticale. Agronomy Journal, 2004(96): 1013-1020.

[27] 高信曾. 植物学(形态、解剖部分). 北京: 人民教育出版社, 1978.

Gao X Z. Palnt Science(Morphology, Anatomy). Beijing: People Education Press, 1978. (in Chinese)

[28] P 麦克唐纳, R A爱德华兹, J F D 格林霍夫. 赵义斌, 胡令浩译. 动物营养学(第四版). 甘肃: 甘肃民族出版社, 1992.

McDonald P, Edwards R A, Greenhoff J F D. Translated by Zhao Y B, Hu L H. Animal Nutrition (4th ed.). Gansu: Gansu National Press, 1992. (in Chinese)

[29] Kowsar R, Ghorbani G R, Alikhani M, Khorvash M, Nikkhah A. Corn silage partially replacing short alfalfa hay to optimize forage use in total mixed rations for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, 91: 4755-4764.

[30] Mullins C R, Grigsby K N, Bradford B J. Effects of alfalfa hay inclusion rate on productivity of lactating dairy cattle fed wet corn gluten feed-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009, 92: 3510-3516.
[1] CHAI HaiYan,JIA Jiao,BAI Xue,MENG LingMin,ZHANG Wei,JIN Rong,WU HongBin,SU QianFu. Identification of Pathogenic Fusarium spp. Causing Maize Ear Rot and Susceptibility of Some Strains to Fungicides in Jilin Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 64-78.
[2] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[3] LI ZhouShuai,DONG Yuan,LI Ting,FENG ZhiQian,DUAN YingXin,YANG MingXian,XU ShuTu,ZHANG XingHua,XUE JiQuan. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Yield and Combining Ability Based on Maize Hybrid Population [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1695-1709.
[4] XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[5] LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[6] WU Yue,SUI XinHua,DAI LiangXiang,ZHENG YongMei,ZHANG ZhiMeng,TIAN YunYun,YU TianYi,SUN XueWu,SUN QiQi,MA DengChao,WU ZhengFeng. Research Advances of Bradyrhizobia and Its Symbiotic Mechanisms with Peanut [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1518-1528.
[7] MA XiaoYan,YANG Yu,HUANG DongLin,WANG ZhaoHui,GAO YaJun,LI YongGang,LÜ Hui. Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[8] LI Qian,QIN YuBo,YIN CaiXia,KONG LiLi,WANG Meng,HOU YunPeng,SUN Bo,ZHAO YinKai,XU Chen,LIU ZhiQuan. Effect of Drip Fertigation Mode on Maize Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[9] YIN GuangKun,XIN Xia,ZHANG JinMei,CHEN XiaoLing,LIU YunXia,HE JuanJuan,HUANG XueQi,LU XinXiong. The Progress and Prospects of the Theoretical Research on the Safe Conservation of Germplasm Resources in Genebank [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1263-1270.
[10] ZHANG JiaHua,YANG HengShan,ZHANG YuQin,LI CongFeng,ZHANG RuiFu,TAI JiCheng,ZHOU YangChen. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Modes on Starch Accumulation and Activities of Starch Synthesis-Related Enzyme of Spring Maize Grain in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1332-1345.
[11] TAN XianMing,ZHANG JiaWei,WANG ZhongLin,CHEN JunXu,YANG Feng,YANG WenYu. Prediction of Maize Yield in Relay Strip Intercropping Under Different Water and Nitrogen Conditions Based on PLS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138.
[12] LIU Miao,LIU PengZhao,SHI ZuJiao,WANG XiaoLi,WANG Rui,LI Jun. Critical Nitrogen Dilution Curve and Nitrogen Nutrition Diagnosis of Summer Maize Under Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 932-947.
[13] QIAO Yuan,YANG Huan,LUO JinLin,WANG SiXian,LIANG LanYue,CHEN XinPing,ZHANG WuShuai. Inputs and Ecological Environment Risks Assessment of Maize Production in Northwest China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 962-976.
[14] HUANG ZhaoFu, LI LuLu, HOU LiangYu, GAO Shang, MING Bo, XIE RuiZhi, HOU Peng, WANG KeRu, XUE Jun, LI ShaoKun. Accumulated Temperature Requirement for Field Stalk Dehydration After Maize Physiological Maturity in Different Planting Regions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 680-691.
[15] FANG MengYing,LU Lin,WANG QingYan,DONG XueRui,YAN Peng,DONG ZhiQiang. Effects of Ethylene-Chlormequat-Potassium on Root Morphological Construction and Yield of Summer Maize with Different Nitrogen Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4808-4822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!