Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 43-54.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.01.05

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Relationship Between Light Interception and Light Utilization of Soybean Canopy in Relay Strip Intercropping System

CUI Liang, SU Ben-ying, YANG Feng, YANG Wen-yu   

  1. College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest, Ministry of Agriculture, Yaan 625014, Sichuan
  • Received:2014-03-03 Online:2015-01-01 Published:2015-01-01

Abstract: 【Objective】 Intercropping, as one of the most universal multiple cropping systems based on biodiversity, plays an important role in enhancing crop productivity for more efficient use of resources, such as land, light, temperature and water as well as reducing incidence of weeds, insects, pests and diseases to meet the future human demand. Cereal-legume relay intercropping system is commonly used in China, because of the different distances between maize and soybean which influence the PAR distribution above the soybean canopy within relay strip intercropping system, and it is not only bad to the development of canopy structure but also decreases the light interception of intercropped soybean, thus resulting in limited photosynthetic active radiation use efficiency of intercropped soybean which restricts the productivity of maize-soybean relay strip intercropping systems. Therefore, there is a need for exploring an optimum spatial-temporal configuration management of intercropping system based on competition so that light resources requirement of soybean can be realized in this system. 【Method】 An experiment with maize (Zea mays L.) cultivar Chuandan 418 and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivar Gongxuan1 were used in this study. The relay strip intercropping systems were designed as the distances of maize intercropped with soybean were 40 cm (A),50 cm (B) and 60 cm (C), and both of maize monoculture (SM) and soybean monoculture (SSB) were used as control. The soybean population canopy structure, light interception, dry matter weight in the relay strip intercropping combinations were measured and analyzed under maize/soybean relay strip intercropping systems in order to optimize the reasonable group configuration.【Result】 The PAR density was different above the soybean canopy under different maize-soybean relay strip intercropping systems, and lower than SSB significantly (P<0.05). During the co-growth stage of maize and soybean, the PAR density occurred in treatment A was lower than that in treatments B and C by 44.1% and 60.4%, respectively. This means that the PAR density decreased as the degree of low light stress increasing due to the distance between maize and soybean decreased. The LAI, LA and plant height of intercropped soybean varied considerably in different maize-soybean relay strip intercropping systems. During the stages of V5, V7 and R1, the LAI of treatment B was higher than treatment A and treatment C significantly. Treatment B was higher than that in treatments C and A by 16.4%, 13.1%, 12% and 30.3%, 32.2%, 29.3%. LA of treatment B was higher than that in treatments C and A by 15%, 16%, 14% and 34%,31%,26%. Plant height of treatment B was lower than that in treatments C and A by 7%, 8.8%, 7.9% and 13.5%, 16.7%, 14.8%, which means that suitable soybean canopy structure can improve RUE. The LI of intercropped soybean was decreased significantly under different maize-soybean relay strip intercropping. During the stages of V5, V7 and R1, the LI of treatments A and C was lower than that in treatment B by 43%, 22%, 33% and 21%, 10%, 17%. A positive correlation of LAI and LI was significant (0.977**), which means that LAI might be the main factor due to the LI increasing. The photosynthetic active radiation use efficiency of intercropped soybean varied considerably in different maize-soybean relay strip intercropping systems. During the stages of V5, V7 and R1, the RUE of treatment B was higher than that in treatments C and A by 8.6%, 7%, 5.8% and 40%, 23%, 13%. The dry matter weight of soybean in all intercropping systems was lower than monoculture significantly (P<0.05), and varied considerably in different maize and soybean relay strip intercropping systems. During the stages of V5, V7 and R1, the dry matter weight of treatments A and C was lower than that in treatment B by 59%, 36%, 41% and 27%, 16% and 22%. A positive correlation of DMW and LI was significant (0.989**), which means that the dry matter increased with the light interception increasing. The yield of intercropped soybean and total yield varied considerably in different maize and soybean relay strip intercropping systems(P<0.05). The yield of treatment B was higher than that in treatments C and A by 10% and 27%, the total yield of treatment B was higher than that in treatments C and A by 1% and 3%. This means that the yield of intercropped soybean increased/decreased as influenced by the intensified low light stress due to the difference of distance between maize and soybean. 【Conclusion】In this case, suitable distance of maize and soybean configuration could optimize intercropped soybean canopy structure, improve the light use efficiency and enhance yield.

Key words: soybean, maize, relay strip intercropping system, canopy structure, light interception, light use efficiency

[1]    Li L, Li S M, Sun J H, Zhou L L, Bao X G, Zhang H G, Zhang F S. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus-deficient soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 2007, 104: 11192-11196.
[2]    Echarte L, Maggiora A D, Cerrudo D, Gonzalez V H, Abbate P, Cerrudo A, Sadras V O, Calvino P. Yield response to plant density of maize and sunflower intercropped with soybean. Field Crops Research, 2011, 121: 423-429.
[3]    Launay M, Brisson N, Satger S, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Corre-Hellou G, Kasynova E, Ruske R, Jensen E S, Gooding M J. Exploring options for managing strategies for pea-barley intercropping using a modeling approach. European Journal of Agronomy, 2009, 31: 85-98.
[4]    杨文钰, 杨峰, 雍太文. 我国间套作大豆研究方向和发展对策研讨会纪要. 大豆科技, 2011(1): 35-36.
Yang W Y, Yang F, Yong T W. Summary of the symposium in research direction and development countermeasure of intercropping soybean. Soybean Bulletin, 2011(1): 35-36. (in Chinese)
[5]    Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W. Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2008. 28: 257-263.
[6]    Mucheru-Muna M, Pypers P, Mugendi D, Kung’u J, Mugwe J, Merckx R, Vanlauwe B. A staggered maize-legume intercrop arrangement robustly increases crop yields and economic returns in the highlands of Central Kenya. Field Crops Research, 2010, 115: 132-139.
[7]    Jeremy W S, David W M, Thomas J S, John H P, Jerry L H. Variability of light interception and radiation use efficiency in maize and soybean. Field Crops Research, 2011, 121: 147-152.
[8]    Yan Y H, Gong W Z, Yang W Y, Wan Y, Chen X L, Chen Z Q, Wang L Y. Seed treatment with uniconazole powder improves soybean seedling growth under shading by corn in relay strip intercropping system. Plant Production Science, 2010, 13(4): 367-374.
[9]    Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y. Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Annals of Botany, 2007, 99: 375-407.
[10]   王锡平, 李保国, 郭焱, 翟志席. 玉米冠层内光合有效辐射三维空间分布的测定和分析. 作物学报, 2004, 30(6): 568-576.
Wang X P, Li B G, Guo Y, Zhai Z X. Measurement and analysis of the 3D spatial distribution of photosynthetically active radiation in maize canopy. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004, 30(6): 568-576. (in Chinese)
[11]   Fourcaud T, Zhang X, Stokes A, Lambers H, KÕrner C. Plant growth modelling and applications: the increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models. Annals of Botany, 2008, 101: 1053-1063.
[12]   Bell M J, Garside A L. Shoot and stalk dynamics and the yield of sugarcane crops in tropical and subtropical Queensland, Australia. Field Crops Research, 2005, 92: 231-248.
[13]   杨峰, 崔亮, 武晓玲, 刘卫国, 杨文钰. 不同空间配置套作大豆后期农学参数及光谱特征分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34(3): 268-272.
Yang F, Cui L, Wu X L, Liu W G, Yang W Y. Soybean agronomic and hyperspectral characteristics at later stage under spatial patterns of maize-soybean intercropping. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2012, 34(3): 268-272. (in Chinese)
[14]   赵海新, 杨丽敏, 陈书强, 姜树坤, 黄晓群, 单莉莉, 潘国君. 行距对两个不同类型水稻品种冠层结构与产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(5): 36-42.
Zhao H X, Yang L M, Chen S Q, Jiang S K, Huang X Q, Shan L L, Pan G J. Effects of row-specing on canopy structure and yield in different type rice. Chinese Journal of Rice Sciences, 2011, 25(5): 36-42. (in Chinese)
[15]   赵永平, 张恩和, 潘永东, 包奇军. 不同基因型啤酒大麦冠层光合生理特性的差异. 麦类作物学报, 2008, 28(6): 1048-1053.
Zhao Y P, Zhang E H, Pan Y D, Bao Q J. Difference of canopy photophysiological characters among different genotypes of malting barley. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2008, 28(6): 1048-1053. (in Chinese)
[16]   金剑, 刘晓冰, 王光华. 不同熟期大豆R4—R5期冠层某些生理生态性状与产量的关系. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(9): 1293-1300.
Jin J, Liu X B, Wang G H. Some eco-physiological characteristics at R4-R5 stage in relation to soybean yield differing in maturities. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004, 37(9): 1293-1300. (in Chinese)
[17]   Fehr W R, Caviness C E. Stages of soybean development, special report. Ames: Lowa State University, 1977, 80: 11.
[18]   魏建军, 罗赓彤, 张力, 张占琴. 高产大豆主要群体生理参数的变化及其对产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2009, 28(3): 472-476.
Wei J J, Luo G T, Zhang L, Zhang Z Q. Changes of main physiological parameters of soybean population and influences on yield in different year. Soybean Science, 2009, 28(6): 472-476. (in Chinese)
[19]   朱相成, 汤亮, 张文宇, 曹梦莹, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 不同品种和栽培条件下水稻冠层光合有效辐射传输特征. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(1): 34-43.
Zhu X C, Tang L, Zhang W Y, Cao M Y, Cao W X, Zhu Y. Transfer characteristics of canopy photosynthetically active radiation in different rice cultivars under different cultural conditions. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(1): 34-43.
[20]   李艳大, 汤亮, 张玉屏, 朱相成, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 水稻冠层光截获与叶面积和产量的关系. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(16): 3296-3305.
Li Y D, Tang L, Zhang Y P, Zhu X C, Cao W X, Zhu Y. Relationship of PAR interception of canopy to leaf area and yield in rice. Scientia Agricultural Sinica, 2010, 43(16): 3296-3305. (in Chinese)
[21]   李艳大, 汤亮, 张玉屏, 刘蕾蕾, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 水稻冠层光合有效辐射的时空分布特征. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(4): 952-958.
Li Y D, Tang L, Zhang Y P, Liu L L, Cao W X, Zhu Y. Spatio-temporal distribution of photosynthetically active radiation in rice canopy. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(4): 952-958. (in Chinese)
[22]   王谦, 陈景玲, 孙治强. LAI-2000冠层分析仪在不同植物群体光分布特征研究中的应用. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(5): 922-927.
Wang Q, Chen J L, Sun Z Q. The utility of LAI-2000 canopy analyzer studying the sunlight distribution characteristics in different plant colonies. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(5): 922-927. (in Chinese)
[23]   Zhang L, van der Werf W, Bastiaans L, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz J H J. Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Research, 2008, 107: 29-42.
[24]   Keating B A, Carberry P S. Resource capture and use in intercropping: Solar radiation. Field Crops Research, 1993, 34: 273-301.
[25]   Tsubo M, Walker S, Mukhala E. Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono-/inter-cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71: 17-29.
[26]   Vandermeer J. The Ecology of Intercropping. New York:Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[27]   Acreche M M, Briceno-Felix G, Martin Sanchez J A, Slafer G A. Radiation interception and use efficiency as affected by breeding in Mediterranean wheat. Field Crops Research, 2009, 110: 91-97.
[28]   陈雨海, 余松烈, 于振文. 小麦生长后期群体光截获量及其分布与产量的关系. 作物学报, 2003, 29(5): 730-734.
Chen Y H, Yu S L, Yu Z W. Relationship between amount or distribution of PAR interception and grain output of wheat communities. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2003, 29(5): 730-734. (in Chinese)
[29]   刘建丰, 袁隆平, 邓启云, 陈立云, 蔡义东. 超高产杂交稻的光合特性研究. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(2): 258-264.
Liu J F, Yuan L P, Deng Q Y, Chen L Y, Cai Y D. A study on characteristics of photosynthesis in super high-yielding hybrid rice.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(2): 258-264. (in Chinese)
[30]   Reta-Sanchez D G, Fowler J L. Canopy light environment and yield of narrow-row cotton as affected by canopy architecture. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94: 1317-1323.
[31]   Stewart D W, Costa C, Dwyer L M, Smith D L, Hamilton R I, Ma B  L. Canopy structure, light interception, and photosynthesis in maize. Agronomy Journal, 2003, 95: 1465-1474.
[32]   郭江, 肖凯, 郭新宇, 张凤路, 赵春江. 玉米冠层结构、光分布和光合作用研究综述. 玉米科学, 2005, 13(2): 55-59.
Guo J, Xiao K, Guo X Y, Zhang F L, Zhao C J. Review on maize canopy structure, light distributing and canopy photosynthesis. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2005, 13(2): 55-59. (in Chinese)
[33]   杨文平, 郭天财, 刘胜波, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 行距配置对‘兰考矮早八’小麦后期群体冠层结构及其微环境的影响. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 485-490.
Yang W P, Guo T C, Liu S B, Wang C Y, Wang Y H, Ma D Y. Effects of row spacing in winter wheat on canopy structure and microclimate in later growth stage. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(2): 485-490. (in Chinese)
[34]   王庆成, 刘开昌, 张秀清, 王春英, 张海林. 紧凑型玉米新杂交种群体结构特点和变化动态. 山东农业科学, 1998(5): 4-9.
Wang Q C, Liu K C, Zhang X Q, Wang C Y, Zhang H L. Character and dynamic changes of population structure for new compact maize hybrids. Journal of Shangdong Agricultural Science, 1998(5): 4-9. (in Chinese)
[35]   Maddonni G A, Otegui M E, Cirilo A G. Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71(3): 183-193.
[36]   王俊秀, 高聚林, 王志刚, 桑丹丹, 胡嗣瑞, 王永平, 张军, 常国友. 不同覆膜方式对春玉米超高产群体冠层垂直结构的影响. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(6): 63-67.
Wang J X, Gao J L, Wang Z G, Sang D D, Hu S R, Wang Y P, Zhang J, Chang G Y. Effects of different film mulching treatments on vertical canopy structures of super-high yield colony of spring maize. Journal of Maize Science, 2009, 17(6): 63-67. (in Chinese)
[37]   Gardner F P, Pearce R B, Mitchell R L. Physiology of Crop Plants. Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1985: 31-46.
[38]   金剑, 刘晓冰, 王光华, 李艳华. 大豆生殖生长期冠层结构及其与冠层辐射的关系研究. 东北农业大学学报, 2004, 35(4): 412-418.
Jin J, Liu X B, Wang G H, Li Y H. Study on relationship between canopy structure and radiation of soybean during reproductive stage. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2004, 35(4): 412-418. (in Chinese)
[39]   董乔雪, 王一鸣, 杨丽丽, 杨卫中, 石庆兰, 徐云. 番茄三维形态结构的参数提取与模拟. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(2): 38-42.
Dong Q X, Wang Y M, Yang L L, Yang W Z, Shi Q L, Xu Y. Parameter identification of tomato 3D architectural model and simulation. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(2): 38-42. (in Chinese)
[40]   沈秀瑛, 戴俊英, 胡安畅, 顾慰连, 郑波. 玉米群体冠层特征与光截获及产量关系的研究. 作物学报, 1993, 19(3): 246-252.
Shen X Y, Dai J Y, Hu A C, Gu W L, Zheng B. Studies on relationship among character of canopy light interception and yield in maize population (Zea mays L.). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1993, 19(3): 246-252. (in Chinese)
[41]   李生秀, 魏建军, 刘建国, 高振江. 窄行密植对大豆群体冠层结构及光分布的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2005, 42(6): 412-414.
Li S X, Wei J J, Liu J G, Gao Z J. Effects of planting with narrow line and proper density on canopy structure light penetration of soybean. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 42(6): 412-414.(in Chinese)
[42]   杨国敏, 孙淑娟, 周勋波, 陈雨海, 齐林, 高会军, 刘岩. 群体分布和灌溉对冬小麦农田光能利用的影响. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(8): 1868-1875.
Yang G M, Sun S J, Zhou X B, Chen Y H, Qi L, Gao H J, Liu Y. Effects of population distribution pattern and irrigation schedule on radiation utilization in winter wheat farmland. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(8): 1868-1875.(in Chinese)
[43]   吕丽华, 陶洪斌, 夏来坤, 张雅杰, 赵明, 赵久然, 王璞. 不同种植密度下的夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性. 作物学报, 2008, 34(3): 447-455.
LÜ L H, Tao H B, Xia L K, Zhang Y J, Zhao M, Zhao J R, Wang P. Canopy structure and photosynthesis traits of summer maize under different planting densities. Acta Agronmica Sinica, 2008, 34(3): 447-455.(in Chinese)
[44]   李国强, 汤亮, 张文宇, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 施氮量对不同株型小麦品种叶型垂直分布特征的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37(1): 127-137.
Li G Q, Tang L, Zhang W Y, Cao W X, Zhu Y. Effects of nitrogen rate on vertical distribution characteristics of leaf-type in wheat with different plant type. Acta Agronmica Sinica, 2011, 37(1): 127-137.(in Chinese)
[45]   周勋波, 杨国敏, 孙淑娟, 陈雨海. 不同株行距配置对夏大豆群体结构及光截获的影响. 生态学报, 2010, 30(3): 691-697.
Zhou X B, Yang G M, Sun S J, Chen Y H. Effect of different plant row spacing on population structure and PAR interception in summer soybean. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010,30(3): 691-697.(in Chinese)
[46]   李世莹, 冯伟, 王永华, 王晨阳, 郭天财. 宽幅播种带间距对冬小麦冠层特征及产量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(8): 758-767.
Li S Y, Feng W, Wang Y H, Wang C Y, Guo T C. Effects of spacing interval of wide bed planting on canopy characteristics and yield in winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(8): 758-767.
[1] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[2] CHAI HaiYan,JIA Jiao,BAI Xue,MENG LingMin,ZHANG Wei,JIN Rong,WU HongBin,SU QianFu. Identification of Pathogenic Fusarium spp. Causing Maize Ear Rot and Susceptibility of Some Strains to Fungicides in Jilin Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 64-78.
[3] LI ZhouShuai,DONG Yuan,LI Ting,FENG ZhiQian,DUAN YingXin,YANG MingXian,XU ShuTu,ZHANG XingHua,XUE JiQuan. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Yield and Combining Ability Based on Maize Hybrid Population [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1695-1709.
[4] DONG YongXin,WEI QiWei,HONG Hao,HUANG Ying,ZHAO YanXiao,FENG MingFeng,DOU DaoLong,XU Yi,TAO XiaoRong. Establishment of ALSV-Induced Gene Silencing in Chinese Soybean Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1710-1722.
[5] XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[6] LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[7] GUO ShiBo,ZHANG FangLiang,ZHANG ZhenTao,ZHOU LiTao,ZHAO Jin,YANG XiaoGuang. The Possible Effects of Global Warming on Cropping Systems in China XIV. Distribution of High-Stable-Yield Zones and Agro-Meteorological Disasters of Soybean in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1763-1780.
[8] MA XiaoYan,YANG Yu,HUANG DongLin,WANG ZhaoHui,GAO YaJun,LI YongGang,LÜ Hui. Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[9] LI Qian,QIN YuBo,YIN CaiXia,KONG LiLi,WANG Meng,HOU YunPeng,SUN Bo,ZHAO YinKai,XU Chen,LIU ZhiQuan. Effect of Drip Fertigation Mode on Maize Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[10] ZHANG JiaHua,YANG HengShan,ZHANG YuQin,LI CongFeng,ZHANG RuiFu,TAI JiCheng,ZHOU YangChen. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Modes on Starch Accumulation and Activities of Starch Synthesis-Related Enzyme of Spring Maize Grain in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1332-1345.
[11] TAN XianMing,ZHANG JiaWei,WANG ZhongLin,CHEN JunXu,YANG Feng,YANG WenYu. Prediction of Maize Yield in Relay Strip Intercropping Under Different Water and Nitrogen Conditions Based on PLS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138.
[12] LIU Miao,LIU PengZhao,SHI ZuJiao,WANG XiaoLi,WANG Rui,LI Jun. Critical Nitrogen Dilution Curve and Nitrogen Nutrition Diagnosis of Summer Maize Under Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 932-947.
[13] QIAO Yuan,YANG Huan,LUO JinLin,WANG SiXian,LIANG LanYue,CHEN XinPing,ZHANG WuShuai. Inputs and Ecological Environment Risks Assessment of Maize Production in Northwest China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 962-976.
[14] HUANG ZhaoFu, LI LuLu, HOU LiangYu, GAO Shang, MING Bo, XIE RuiZhi, HOU Peng, WANG KeRu, XUE Jun, LI ShaoKun. Accumulated Temperature Requirement for Field Stalk Dehydration After Maize Physiological Maturity in Different Planting Regions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 680-691.
[15] JIANG FenFen, SUN Lei, LIU FangDong, WANG WuBin, XING GuangNan, ZHANG JiaoPing, ZHANG FengKai, LI Ning, LI Yan, HE JianBo, GAI JunYi. Geographic Differentiation and Evolution of Photo-Thermal Comprehensive Responses of Growth-Periods in Global Soybeans [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 451-466.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!