陕西省小农户作物生产的减肥潜力及经济效益评价

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.20.011

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】The material input of agriculture production is generally high for smallholder farmers, and the application rate of chemical fertilizers will change with the evolution of crop structure. Understanding the situation of nutrient input and economic benefits of smallholder to cereal crop, oil crop and cash crop could help guide scientific fertilization and improve economic benefits. 【Method】In 2018, a questionnaire survey was conducted on the production of major crops in Shaanxi Province. The cereal crop (wheat, maize, rice, millet, and potato), oil crop (canola and soybean), and cash crop (apple, tomato, and flue-cured tobacco) were considered as targeted crops, and a total of 1 709 questionnaires were obtained. Further, the fertilization status of smallholder, the potential of fertilizer reduction, and economic benefits according to yield level of different crops were evaluated. 【Result】For the production of wheat, maize, rice, millet, and potato, the mean yield was 4.6, 7.3, 8.3, 3.7, and 19.8 t·hm^-2, respectively; the mean nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate was 177, 247, 186, 255, and 209 kg N·hm^-2, respectively; the mean phosphate (P) fertilizer rate was 102, 103, 88, 142, and 125 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2; mean potassium (K) fertilizer rate was 37, 47, 64, 53, and 110 kg K₂O·hm^-2, respectively. For canola and soybean production, the mean yield was 2.4 and 2.7 t·hm^-2, N fertilizer rate was 156 and 99 kg N·hm^-2, P fertilizer rate was 80 and 63 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2, K fertilizer rate was 56 and 26 kg K₂O·hm^-2, respectively. For the production of apple, tomato, and tobacco, the mean yield was 23.8, 93.5, and 2.7 t·hm^-2, respectively; N fertilizer rate was 731, 471, and 118 kg N·hm^-2, P fertilizer rate was 482, 387, and 118 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2, K fertilizer rate was 535, 447, and 132 kg K₂O·hm^-2, respectively. N and P fertilizers were usually over-applied, while both over-application and under-application of K fertilizer coexisted. The potential of N, P, K fertilizer reduction ranges from 28% to 60%, 52% to 66%, and 11% to 51% for cereal crop, 33%, 37% and 46% for canola, respectively. However, the application rate of P and K fertilizer needed to increase by 11% and 28% for soybean production, respectively. The potential of N, P, and K fertilizer reduction ranged from 41% to 67%, 65% to 70%, and 49% to 64% for apple and tomato production, respectively. For tobacco production, the application rate of P fertilizer could decrease by 53%, while the application rate of N fertilizer needed to increase by 22% and 11% for farmers with medium and high-yielding, respectively. The source of N was mainly compound fertilizers and urea, and the sources of P and K were mainly compound fertilizers. For the way of chemical fertilizer application, most of N fertilizer was applied as basal fertilizer, and a small part was supplemented by topdressing, while almost all P and K fertilizers were applied as basal fertilizer. For cereal crop, oil crop, and cash crop, the cost of fertilizer application accounted for 31%-52%, 57%-59% and 48%-65% of total input, respectively, and the net economic benefit ranged from 0.44×10⁴to 1.63×10⁴, 0.75×10⁴to 0.84×10⁴, and 4.19×10⁴ to 15.05×10⁴yuan/hm², respectively. Because the net economic benefit of high-yielding in cash crop, e.g., apple and tomato, was higher than that of cereal crop and oil crop, smallholder farmers were more inclined to grow them. However, the substantial application of chemical fertilizer in cash crop production brought great environmental risks. 【Conclusion】The main target of fertilizer reduction and benefit improvement was smallholder with low and middle-yielding level. Compared with cereal crop and oil crop, the economic benefit of cash crop, especially for apple and tomato, was higher, while their potential of fertilizer reduction was also higher due to substantial application of chemical fertilizer. Notably, the result of the study also demonstrated that there was also insufficient application of fertilizer in crop production, e.g., soybean and tobacco. In conclusion, the fertilizer management of smallholder varied greatly. Improving the level of fertilizer management for smallholder was conducive to increasing both yield and economic benefits, and thus contributing to sustainable crop production.

Key words: household behavior, crop classification, nutrients management, yield, economic benefit, Shaanxi Province

MI XiaoTian,SHI Lei,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Fertilizer Reduction Potential and Economic Benefits of Crop Production for Smallholder Farmers in Shaanxi Province[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4370-4384.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.20.011

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2021/V54/I20/4370

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Productivity of crops and the application rate of fertilizer"

作物分类 Crop classification	作物类型 Crop type	产量水平 Yield level	等级范围 Yield range (t·hm^-2)	样本数 Sample amount	产量 Yield (t·hm^-2)	施氮量 N rate (kg N·hm^-2)	施磷量 P rate (kg P₂O₅·hm^-2)	施钾量 K rate (kg K₂O·hm^-2)
粮食作物 Cereal crop	小麦 Wheat	低产 Low	<4.0	100	3.2 c	152 b	112 a	35 a
		中产 Mid	4.0—5.2	103	4.5 b	183 a	95 a	35 a
		高产 High	>5.2	109	5.8 a	193 a	99 a	42 a
	玉米 Maize	低产 Low	<6.8	224	5.3 c	237 a	85 c	42 b
		中产 Mid	6.8—9.0	178	7.8 b	257 a	107 b	43 b
		高产 High	>9.0	112	10.7a	251 a	132 a	64 a
	水稻 Rice	低产 Low	<7.4	24	6.4 c	218 a	63 b	59 a
		中产 Mid	7.4—8.8	55	7.9 b	178 b	102 a	55 a
		高产 High	>8.8	71	9.3 a	182 b	86 ab	73 a
	谷子 Millet	低产 Low	<2.7	10	0.8 c	326 a	105 a	92 a
		中产 Mid	2.7—4.6	26	3.6 b	233 b	141 a	34 b
		高产 High	>4.6	15	5.8 a	247 b	164 a	60 ab
	马铃薯 Potato	低产 Low	<15.8	80	11.9 c	214 a	139 a	89 a
		中产 Mid	15.8—24.0	119	20.7 b	216 a	128 a	121 a
		高产 High	>24.0	50	30.1 a	186 a	96 a	117 a
油料作物 Oil crop	油菜 Canola	低产 Low	<2.1	31	1.7 c	139 b	65 a	34 b
		中产 Mid	2.1—2.6	66	2.3 b	141 b	85 a	59 a
		高产 High	>2.6	75	2.8 a	175 a	83 a	62 a
	大豆 Soybean	低产 Low	<2.6	24	1.7 c	81 a	71 a	24 b
		中产 Mid	2.6—3.9	10	3.0 b	135 a	42 a	15 b
		高产 High	>3.9	8	5.6 a	89 a	66 a	44 a
经济作物 Cash crop	苹果 Apple	低产 Low	<19.7	70	11.5 c	614 b	412 b	445 b
		中产 Mid	19.7—34.8	61	27.0 b	761 ab	481 b	545 ab
		高产 High	>34.8	32	44.4 a	930 a	636 a	711 a
	西红柿 Tomato	低产 Low	<86.0	17	59.8 c	438 b	339 b	377 b
		中产 Mid	86.0—118.0	5	80.4 b	311 b	225 b	348 b
		高产 High	>118.0	4	117.8 a	812 a	791 a	870 a
	烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco	低产 Low	<2.8	21	2.2 c	101 b	110 b	101 c
		中产 Mid	2.8—3.6	4	3.3 b	94 b	113 b	169 b
		高产 High	>3.6	5	4.1 a	128 a	153 a	230 a

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

References 41

[1]	朱兆良, 金继运. 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2):259-273. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0201. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0201
	ZHU Z L, JIN J Y. Fertilizer use and food security in China. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(2):259-273. doi: 10.11674/ zwyf.2013.0201. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0201
[2]	VITOUSEK P M, NAYLOR R, CREWS T, DAVID M B, DRINKWATER L E, HOLLAND E, JOHNES P J, KATZENBERGER J, MARTINELLI L A, MATSON P A, NZIGUHEBA G, OJIMA D, PALM C A, ROBERTSON G P, SANCHEZ P A, TOWNSEND A R, ZHANG F S. Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science, 2009, 324(5934):1519-1520. doi: 10.1126/science.1170261. doi: 10.1126/science.1170261
[3]	陕西省统计局. 陕西统计年鉴. 西安: 中国统计出版社, 2010-2018.
	Shaanxi Provincial Bureau Of Statistics. Shaanxi Statistical Yearbook. Xi’an: China Statistics Press, 2010-2018. (in Chinese)
[4]	侯萌瑶, 张丽, 王知文, 杨殿林, 王丽丽, 修伟明, 赵建宁. 中国主要农作物化肥用量估算. 农业资源与环境学报, 2017, 34(4):360-367. doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2017.0061. doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2017.0061
	HOU M Y, ZHANG L, WANG Z W, YANG D L, WANG L L, XIU W M, ZHAO J N. Estimation of fertilizer usage from main crops in China. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2017, 34(4):360-367. doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2017.0061. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2017.0061
[5]	史常亮, 朱俊峰. 我国粮食生产中化肥投入的经济评价和分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(9):57-63. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.283. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.283
	SHI C L, ZHU J F. Economic evaluation and analysis of chemical fertilizer inputs in Chinese grain production. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(9):57-63. doi: . 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.283. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.283
[6]	GUO J H, LIU X J, ZHANG Y, SHEN J L, HAN W X, ZHANG W F, CHRISTIE P, GOULDING K W T, VITOUSEK P M, ZHANG F S. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010, 327(5968):1008-1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1182570. doi: 10.1126/science.1182570
[7]	刘芬. 陕西省土壤养分与肥料资源利用研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2015.
	LIU F. Study on soil nutrient and fertilizer resource utilization in Shaanxi Province[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[8]	王小英, 陈占飞, 胡凡, 同延安. 陕西省农田化肥投入过量与不足的研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(6):159-165. doi: 10.7606/j. issn.1000-7601.2017.06.24. doi: 10.7606/j. issn.1000-7601.2017.06.24
	WANG X Y, CHEN Z F, HU F, TONG Y A. Study on the excessive and insufficient of chemical fertilizer inputs on farmland in Shaanxi Province. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(6):159-165. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2017.06.24. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7606/j. issn.1000-7601.2017.06.24
[9]	YANG X Y, FANG S B. Practices, perceptions, and implications of fertilizer use in East-Central China. Ambio, 2015, 44(7):647-652. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0639-7. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0639-7
[10]	国家发展和改革委员会价格司. 全国农产品成本收益资料汇编. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2011.
	NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS. Compilation of National Agricultural Products Cost-benefit Data. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[11]	JU X T, KOU C L, ZHANG F S, CHRISTIE P. Nitrogen balance and groundwater nitrate contamination: comparison among three intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain. Environmental Pollution, 2006, 143(1):117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.005. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.005
[12]	曹寒冰, 王朝辉, 赵护兵, 马小龙, 佘旭, 张璐, 蒲岳建, 杨珍珍, 吕辉, 师渊超, 杜明叶. 基于产量的渭北旱地小麦施肥评价及减肥潜力分析. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(14):2758-2768.
	CAO H B, WANG Z H, ZHAO H B, MA X L, SHE X, ZHANG L, PU Y J, YANG Z Z, LÜ H, SHI Y C, DU M Y. Yield based evaluation on fertilizer application and analysis of its reduction potential in Weibei dryland wheat production. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(14):2758-2768. (in Chinese)
[13]	张福锁, 陈新平, 陈清. 中国主要作物施肥指南. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2009: 28-33.
	ZHANG F S, CHEN X P, CHEN Q. Fertilization Guide On Major Crops of China. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2009: 28-33. (in Chinese)
[14]	戴志刚, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤, 鲁明星, 杨文兵, 高祥照. 不同作物还田秸秆的养分释放特征试验. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(6):272-276. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2010.06.047. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2010.06.047
	DAI Z G, LU J W, LI X K, LU M X, YANG W B, GAO X Z. Nutrient release characteristic of different crop straws manure. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(6):272-276. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2010.06.047. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2010.06.047
[15]	宋大利, 侯胜鹏, 王秀斌, 梁国庆, 周卫. 中国秸秆养分资源数量及替代化肥潜力. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(1):1-21.
	SONG D L, HOU S P, WANG X B, LIANG G Q, ZHOU W. Nutrient resource quantity of crop straw and its potential of substituting. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(1):1-21. (in Chinese)
[16]	樊红柱. 苹果树体生长发育、养分吸收利用与累积规律[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2006.
	FAN H Z. The growth, nutrients uptake, utilization and accumulation in apple tree[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2006. (in Chinese)
[17]	姜远茂, 葛顺峰, 毛志泉, 陈学森. 我国苹果产业节本增效关键技术Ⅳ: 苹果高效平衡施肥技术. 中国果树, 2017(4):1-4, 13. doi: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2017.04.001. doi: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2017.04.001
	JIANG Y M, GE S F, MAO Z Q, CHEN X S. Balanced fertilization technology of apple. China Fruits, 2017(4):1-4, 13. doi: 10.16626/ j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2017.04.001. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2017.04.001
[18]	彭福田, 姜远茂, 顾曼如, 束怀瑞. 落叶果树氮素营养研究进展. 果树学报, 2003, 20(1):54-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2003. 01.013. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2003. 01.013
	PENG F T, JIANG Y M, GU M R, SHU H R. Advances in research on nitrogen nutrition of deciduous fruit crops. Journal of Fruit Science, 2003, 20(1):54-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2003.01.013. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2003. 01.013
[19]	WU L Q, CUI Z L, CHEN X P, YUE S C, SUN Y X, ZHAO R F, DENG Y, ZHANG W, CHEN K R. Change in phosphorus requirement with increasing grain yield for Chinese maize production. Field Crops Research, 2015, 180:216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.06.001. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.06.001
[20]	HOU P, GAO Q, XIE R Z, LI S K, MENG Q F, KIRKBY E A, RÖMHELD V, MÜLLER T, ZHANG F S, CUI Z L, CHEN X P. Grain yields in relation to N requirement: Optimizing nitrogen management for spring maize grown in China. Field Crops Research, 2012, 129:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.01.006. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.01.006
[21]	XU X P, HE P, PAMPOLINO M F, CHUAN L M, JOHNSTON A M, QIU S J, ZHAO S C, ZHOU W. Nutrient requirements for maize in China based on QUEFTS analysis. Field Crops Research, 2013, 150:115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.06.006. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.06.006
[22]	XU X P, XIE J G, HOU Y P, HE P, PAMPOLINO M F, ZHAO S C, QIU S J, JOHNSTON A M, ZHOU W. Estimating nutrient uptake requirements for rice in China. Field Crops Research, 2015, 180:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.008. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.008
[23]	金耀青, 张中原. 配方施肥方法及其应用. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社, 1993: 19-20.
	JIN Y Q, ZHANG Z Y. Formula Fertilization Method And Its Application. Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Press, 1993: 19-20. (in Chinese)
[24]	黄德明, 白纲义, 樊淑文. 蔬菜配方施肥. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001: 82-85.
	HUANG D M, BAI G Y, FAN S W. Vegetable Formula Fertilization. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2001: 82-85. (in Chinese)
[25]	黄绍文, 唐继伟, 李春花, 张怀志, 袁硕. 我国蔬菜化肥减施潜力与科学施用对策. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6):1480-1493. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17366. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17366
	HUANG S W, TANG J W, LI C H, ZHANG H Z, YUAN S. Reducing potential of chemical fertilizers and scientific fertilization countermeasure in vegetable production in China. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2017, 23(6):1480-1493. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17366. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17366
[26]	陈晓辉. 中国种植业结构演变及其资源环境代价研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2018.
	CHEN X H. Resource and environmental costs of cropping structure change in China[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[27]	LI S X, WANG Z H, MALHI S S, LI S Q, GAO Y J, TIAN X H. Chapter 7 nutrient and water management effects on crop production, and nutrient and water use efficiency in dryland areas of China. Advances in Agronomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009: 223-265. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2113(09)01007-4. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2113(09)01007-4
[28]	赵护兵, 王朝辉, 高亚军, 张卫峰. 陕西省农户小麦施肥调研评价. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(1):245-253. doi: 10.11674/zwyf. 14243. doi: 10.11674/zwyf. 14243
	ZHAO H B, WANG Z H, GAO Y J, ZHANG W F. Investigation and evaluation of household wheat fertilizer application in Shaanxi Province. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(1):245-253. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.14243. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf. 14243
[29]	王浩, 董朝阳, 王淑兰, 张玉娇, 师祖姣, 张元红, 王瑞, 李军. 基于春玉米籽粒产量的渭北旱塬区农户施肥现状评价. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(3):590-598. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.18022. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.18022
	WANG H, DONG Z Y, WANG S L, ZHANG Y J, SHI Z J, ZHANG Y H, WANGRUI, LI J. Evaluation on fertilization of farmer practice based on grain yield of spring maize in Weibei dryland. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2018, 24(3):590-598. doi: 10.11674/ zwyf.18022. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.18022
[30]	王小英. 陕西省养分资源利用时空变化特征研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2015.
	WANG X Y. Study on characteristics of the temporal and spatial variation of nutrient resource utilization in Shaanxi Province[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[31]	杨如萍, 宋雯雯, 孙石, 吴存祥, 王化俊, 韩天富. 中国不同地区科技示范县大豆单产及产量相关性状的比较. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(4):557-567. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.04.010. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.04.010
	YANG R P, SONG W W, SUN S, WU C X, WANG H J, HAN T F. Comparison of soybean yield and yield-related traits of agri-technology demonstration counties in different regions of China. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(4):557-567. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.04.010. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.04.010
[32]	刘芬, 李献军, 王小英, 赵佐平, 同延安. 陕西省主要农作物测土施肥效益分析. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(2):136-140, 217. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2016.02.22. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2016.02.22
	LIU F, LI X J, WANG X Y, ZHAO Z P, TONG Y N. Benefit analysis of formulated fertilization on main crops in Shaanxi Province. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(2):136-140, 217. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2016.02.22. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2016.02.22
[33]	黎青慧. 陕西省黄瓜西红柿施肥调查. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2003(S1):73-78.
	LI Q H. Investigation on fertilization of cucumber and tomato in Shaanxi Province. Journal of Northwest A $ F University (Natural Science Edition), 2003(S1):73-78. (in Chinese)
[34]	王小英, 刘芬, 同延安, 赵佐平. 陕南秦巴山区油菜施肥现状评价. 中国油料作物学报, 2013, 35(2):190-195. doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.02.013. doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.02.013
	WANG X Y, LIU F, TONG Y N, ZHAO Z P. Fertilization evaluation of rapeseed in Qin-Ba Mountain area of southern Shaanxi Province. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2013, 35(2):190-195. doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.02.013. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.02.013
[35]	王小英, 刘芬, 同延安, 赵佐平. 陕南秦巴山区水稻施肥现状评价. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(11):3106-3112. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0534. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0534
	WANG X Y, LIU F, TONG Y N, ZHAO Z P. Present situation of rice fertilization in Qin-Ba mountainous area of southern Shaanxi, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(11):3106-3112. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0534. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0534
[36]	李嘉, 吕慎强, 杨泽宇, 李惠通, 王吕, 阳婷, 王筱斐, 王林权. 氮肥运筹对黄土塬区春玉米产量、效益和氮肥利用率的综合效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(1):32-41. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.19045. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.19045
	LI J, LÜ S Q, YANG Z Y, LI H T, WANG L, YANG T, WANG X F, WANG L Q. Comprehensive effects of nitrogen fertilizer management on yield, economic performance and nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize in Loess Plateau, China. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2020, 26(1):32-41. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.19045. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.19045
[37]	余小芬, 解燕, 杨树明, 邹炳礼, 刘加红, 张瑞勤, 吕亚琼, 蔡永占, 张素华, 邱学礼. 减施氮磷钾肥和氮肥基追比对云南曲靖烤烟产质量及养分利用的影响. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(4):848-854. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.4.025. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.4.025
	YU X F, XIE Y, YANG S M, ZOU B L, LIU J H, ZHANG R Q, LV Y Q, CAI Y Z, ZHANG S H, QIU X L. Effects of reduced nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer combined with nitrogen dressing ratios on yield, quality and nutrient use efficiency of flue-cured tobacco in Qujing city, Yunnan Province. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(4):848-854. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.4.025. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.4.025
[38]	王艺颖, 刘春力. 陕西省主要粮食作物生产成本收益研究? : 以小麦、玉米为例. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(6):143-148. doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20160623. doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20160623
	WANG Y Y, LIU C L. The cost-benefit analysis of the main grain crops in Shaanxi Province. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2016, 37(6):143-148. doi: 10.7621/cjarrp. 1005-9121.20160623. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20160623
[39]	任世鑫, 李二玲, 邓晴晴, 崔之珍. 中国三大粮食作物化肥施用特征及环境风险评价. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(12):2936-2947. DOI: CNKI:SUN:CJLY.0.2019-12-014. doi: CNKI:SUN:CJLY.0.2019-12-014
	REN S X, LI E L, DENG Q Q, CUI Z Z. Characteristics of fertilizer application and environmental risk assessment of three major grain crops in China. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(12):2936-2947. DOI: CNKI:SUN:CJLY.0.2019-12-014. (in Chinese) doi: CNKI:SUN:CJLY.0.2019-12-014
[40]	刘晓永. 中国农业生产中的养分平衡与需求研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2018.
	LIU X Y. Study on nutrients balance and requirement in agricultural production in China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2018. (in Chinese)
[41]	王卫东, 曹旭. 陕西省主要粮食作物种植结构时空变化特征分析. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(9):155-162. doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20200919. doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20200919
	WANG W D, CAO X. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of main grain crop planting structures in Shaanxi Province. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(9):155-162. doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20200919. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20200919

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

作物分类 Crop classification	作物类型 Crop type	100 kg经济产量养分需求量 Nutrients requirement of 100 kg economic yield (kg)
作物分类 Crop classification	作物类型 Crop type	N	P₂O₅	K₂O
粮食作物 Cereal crop	小麦Wheat^[12]	2.8	0.7	2.4
	玉米 Maize^[19,20,21]	1.74	0.32	1.53
	水稻Rice^[22]	1.71	0.34	1.84
	谷子 Millet^[23]	2.72	0.96	2.32
	马铃薯Potato ^[23]	0.5	0.2	1.0
油料作物 Oil crop	油菜Canola ^{[15, 23]}	4.3	2.5	4.2
油料作物 Oil crop	大豆Soybean ^[23]	7.2	1.7	4.0
经济作物 Cash crop	苹果Apple^{[16, 23]}	0.5	0.2	0.4
	西红柿Tomato^[24,25]	0.32	0.10	0.25
	烤烟Flue-cured tobacco ^[26]	3.5	1.4	4.8

作物分类 Crop classification	作物类型 Crop type	种子 Seed (yuan/hm²)	农药 Pesticide (yuan/hm²)	机械作业 Mechanical work (yuan/hm²)	排灌 Irrigation (yuan/hm²)	雇佣成本 Employ cost (yuan/hm²)	售价 Price (yuan/kg)
粮食作物 Cereal crop	小麦 Wheat	978	302	2302	556	—	2.30
	玉米 Maize	910	200	1667	724	—	1.82
	水稻 Rice	897	209	1662	558	—	2.57
	谷子 Millet	951	804	2863	310	—	2.59
	马铃薯Potato	2790	164	1688	0	—	0.88
油料作物 Oil crop	油菜Canola	636	201	667	246	—	5.16
油料作物 Oil crop	大豆Soybean	516	76	1098	73	—	4.30
经济作物 Cash crop	苹果Apple	0	2653	1429	698	8985	5.79
	西红柿Tomato	3991	3408	1241	1326	5970	2.58
	烤烟Flue-cured tobacco	810	432	786	106	7200	24.50

作物分类 Crop classification	作物类型 Crop type	产量等级 Yield level	总产出 Output (×10⁴yuan/hm²)	投入 Input（yuan/hm²）			总投入 Total (×10⁴yuan/hm²)	肥料占总投入 Fertilizer / total (%)	经济效益 Benefit (×10⁴yuan/hm²)
作物分类 Crop classification	作物类型 Crop type	产量等级 Yield level	总产出 Output (×10⁴yuan/hm²)	单质肥ECF	复合肥 CF	有机肥OM	总投入 Total (×10⁴yuan/hm²)	肥料占总投入 Fertilizer / total (%)	经济效益 Benefit (×10⁴yuan/hm²)
粮食作物 Cereal crop	小麦 Wheat	低产Low	0.76	338	1134	231	0.58	29	0.18 c
		适中Mid	1.07	546	1096	85	0.59	29	0.48 b
		高产High	1.37	434	1543	51	0.62	33	0.77 a
	玉米 Maize	低产Low	0.97	664	888	327	0.54	35	0.43 c
		适中Mid	1.40	807	1016	212	0.55	37	0.85 b
		高产High	1.95	426	2107	216	0.63	44	1.32 a
	水稻 Rice	低产Low	1.66	616	416	583	0.50	32	1.16 c
		适中Mid	2.03	545	1038	217	0.52	35	1.51 b
		高产High	2.40	446	1281	135	0.52	36	1.88 a
	谷子 Millet	低产Low	0.32	801	1350	4500	1.16	57	-0.84 c
		适中Mid	1.38	815	362	2973	0.91	45	0.47 b
		高产High	2.20	732	405	3336	0.95	47	1.26 a
	马铃薯 Potato	低产Low	1.04	266	760	3609	0.93	50	0.11 c
		适中Mid	1.82	390	1835	3259	1.01	54	0.81 b
		高产High	2.64	497	1661	2755	0.96	51	1.68 a
油料作物 Oil crop	大豆 Soybean	低产Low	0.72	241	155	1669	0.38	54	0.34 c
		适中Mid	1.29	603	0	1530	0.39	55	0.90 b
		高产High	2.42	1782	0	4500	0.80	78	1.62 a
	油菜 Canola	低产Low	0.88	379	742	575	0.34	49	0.54 c
		适中Mid	1.18	400	1055	1075	0.43	59	0.75 b
		高产High	1.46	466	1161	828	0.42	58	1.04 a
经济作物 Cash crop	苹果 Apple	低产Low	6.65	623	7482	3277	2.51	45	4.14 c
		适中Mid	15.65	805	8350	2039	2.50	45	13.15 b
		高产High	25.71	1782	9096	2342	2.70	49	23.01 a
	西红柿 Tomato	低产Low	15.46	286	67685	4220	9.18	79	6.28 c
		适中Mid	20.79	408	5143	10350	3.55	45	17.24 b
		高产High	30.43	272	14304	4397	3.85	49	26.57 a
	烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco	低产Low	4.18	0	11250	268	2.16	53	3.96 c
		适中Mid	5.59	0	14063	0	2.41	58	6.35 b
		高产High	6.93	0	19125	0	2.92	66	7.72 b

Fertilizer Reduction Potential and Economic Benefits of Crop Production for Smallholder Farmers in Shaanxi Province

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 41

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

作物分类 Crop classification	作物类型 Crop type	肥料种类 Fertilizer types	氮肥 N fertilizer (kg N·hm^-2)		磷肥 P fertilizer (kg P₂O₅·hm^-2)		钾肥K fertilizer (kg K₂O·hm^-2)
作物分类 Crop classification	作物类型 Crop type	肥料种类 Fertilizer types	基肥 Basal fertilizer	追肥 Topdressing	基肥 Basal fertilizer	追肥 Topdressing	基肥 Basal fertilizer	追肥 Topdressing
粮食作物 Cereal crop	小麦 Wheat	单质肥 ECF	66	20	22	0	3	0
		复合肥 CF	76	0	69	0	25	0
		有机肥 OM	15	0	11	0	10	0
		总和 ALL	157	20	102	0	38	0
	玉米 Maize	单质肥 ECF	51	99	18	1	1	0
		复合肥 CF	68	4	62	4	23	2
		有机肥OM	23	1	18	1	18	1
		总和ALL	142	104	97	6	44	3
	水稻 Rice	单质肥 ECF	55	50	21	0	3	0
		复合肥CF	54	3	48	2	43	1
		有机肥OM	25	0	17	0	16	0
		总和ALL	134	52	86	2	63	1
	谷子 Millet	单质肥 ECF	73	94	34	0	0	0
		复合肥CF	31	0	60	0	13	0
		有机肥OM	57	0	47	0	39	0
		总和ALL	161	94	141	0	53	0
	马铃薯 Potato	单质肥 ECF	47	18	19	0	6	0
		复合肥CF	70	3	63	3	53	3
		有机肥OM	54	0	37	0	43	0
		总和ALL	171	21	119	3	102	3
油料作物 Oil crop	油菜 Canola	单质肥 ECF	38	46	18	0	4	0
		复合肥CF	53	2	51	1	37	1
		有机肥OM	15	2	8	1	12	1
		总和ALL	106	50	77	2	53	2
	大豆 Soybean	单质肥 ECF	40	13	23	1	0	0
		复合肥CF	5	0	12	0	1	0
		有机肥OM	41	0	27	0	25	0
		总和ALL	86	13	62	1	26	0
经济作物 Cash crop	苹果 Apple	单质肥 ECF	75	80	14	2	14	29
		复合肥CF	359	166	19	1	5	138
		有机肥OM	49	2	12	0	0	0
		总和ALL	483	248	45	3	19	167
	西红柿 Tomato	单质肥 ECF	13	32	2	7	9	6
		复合肥CF	159	83	159	56	161	176
		有机肥OM	184	31	149	39	91	45
		总和ALL	356	146	310	102	261	227
	烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco	单质肥 ECF	0	0	0	0	0	0
		复合肥CF	96	0	114	0	130	0
		有机肥OM	8	0	4	0	2	0
		总和ALL	104	0	118	0	132	0

[1]	ZHANG XiaoLi, TAO Wei, GAO GuoQing, CHEN Lei, GUO Hui, ZHANG Hua, TANG MaoYan, LIANG TianFeng. Effects of Direct Seeding Cultivation Method on Growth Stage, Lodging Resistance and Yield Benefit of Double-Cropping Early Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[2]	YAN YanGe, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, ZHAO BingQiang, YUAN Liang. Effects of Dextran Modified Urea on Winter Wheat Yield and Fate of Nitrogen Fertilizer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 287-299.
[3]	XU JiuKai, YUAN Liang, WEN YanChen, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, LI HaiYan, ZHAO BingQiang. Nitrogen Fertilizer Replacement Value of Livestock Manure in the Winter Wheat Growing Season [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[4]	WANG CaiXiang,YUAN WenMin,LIU JuanJuan,XIE XiaoYu,MA Qi,JU JiSheng,CHEN Da,WANG Ning,FENG KeYun,SU JunJi. Comprehensive Evaluation and Breeding Evolution of Early Maturing Upland Cotton Varieties in the Northwest Inland of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 1-16.
[5]	ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[6]	ZHANG Wei,YAN LingLing,FU ZhiQiang,XU Ying,GUO HuiJuan,ZHOU MengYao,LONG Pan. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield of Double Cropping Rice and Utilization Efficiency of Light and Heat Energy in Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 31-45.
[7]	XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[8]	LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[9]	GUO ShiBo,ZHANG FangLiang,ZHANG ZhenTao,ZHOU LiTao,ZHAO Jin,YANG XiaoGuang. The Possible Effects of Global Warming on Cropping Systems in China XIV. Distribution of High-Stable-Yield Zones and Agro-Meteorological Disasters of Soybean in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1763-1780.
[10]	WANG HaoLin,MA Yue,LI YongHua,LI Chao,ZHAO MingQin,YUAN AiJing,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui. Optimal Management of Phosphorus Fertilization Based on the Yield and Grain Manganese Concentration of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[11]	GUI RunFei,WANG ZaiMan,PAN ShengGang,ZHANG MingHua,TANG XiangRu,MO ZhaoWen. Effects of Nitrogen-Reducing Side Deep Application of Liquid Fertilizer at Tillering Stage on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Fragrant Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[12]	LIAO Ping,MENG Yi,WENG WenAn,HUANG Shan,ZENG YongJun,ZHANG HongCheng. Effects of Hybrid Rice on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556.
[13]	LI Qian,QIN YuBo,YIN CaiXia,KONG LiLi,WANG Meng,HOU YunPeng,SUN Bo,ZHAO YinKai,XU Chen,LIU ZhiQuan. Effect of Drip Fertigation Mode on Maize Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[14]	GOU ZhiWen,YIN Wen,CHAI Qiang,FAN ZhiLong,HU FaLong,ZHAO Cai,YU AiZhong,FAN Hong. Analysis of Sustainability of Multiple Cropping Green Manure in Wheat-Maize Intercropping After Wheat Harvested in Arid Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1319-1331.
[15]	QIN YuQing,CHENG HongBo,CHAI YuWei,MA JianTao,LI Rui,LI YaWei,CHANG Lei,CHAI ShouXi. Increasing Effects of Wheat Yield Under Mulching Cultivation in Northern of China: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109.