Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 540-547.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.03.016

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·RESOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Multilevel Nonlinear Mixed Effect Model for Evaluation of   Muscovy Ducks Body Weight for Growth

 ZHANG  Yuan-Yue, HE  Xi   

  1. 1.湖南农业大学动物科学技术学院, 长沙 410128
  • Received:2011-02-27 Online:2012-02-01 Published:2011-09-20

Abstract: 【Objective】 Research on quantificationally describing the model of body weight growth of native Muscovy ducks was carried out. 【Method】 Four body weight growth models were designed using Richards growth function, including 2-level nonlinear mixed effect model considering individual and gender (ModelⅠ), 2-level nonlinear mixed effect model considering individual and gender with autoregressive correlation structure (Model Ⅱ), 1-level nonlinear mixed effect model considering individual (Model Ⅲ), and 0-level nonlinear fixed effect model ignoring individual and gender (Model Ⅳ), to describe the growth characters of individual and population of Muscovy ducks. Information criteria,error variance, average measured and fitted values at different ages, and estimates obtained by fitting the models and growth parameters were compared. 【Result】 The results showed that Model Ⅱ had the best effect overall fit. It was estimated by the model that the birth weight, the mature weight, and the inflexion point age, the body weight and the absolute growth rate at maximum growth rate of male and female native Muscovy ducks were 40 g, 3 504 g, 43 d, 1 523 g, and 65 g•d-1, and 40 g, 2 209 g, 36 d, 977 g, and 45 g•d-1, respectively. 【Conclusion】 Multilevel Richards nonlinear mixed effect model considering individual and gender with autoregressive correlation structure was the best growth model for fitting the body growth of male or female native Muscovy ducks.

Key words: multilevel nonlinear mixed effect model, body growth, Muscovy ducks, evaluation

[1]Crawford R C. Poultry Genetics and Breeding. New York: Elsevier Science Publisher, 1990.

[2]张元跃, 柳小春. 番鸭体重生长非线性混合效应模型评价的研究. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(19): 4101-4108.

Zhang Y Y, Liu X C. Study on nonlinear mixed effect model for evaluation of Muscovy body weight for growth. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(19): 4101-4108. (in Chinese)

[3]Schinckel A P, Adeola O, Einstein M E. Evaluation of alternative nonlinear mixed effects models of duck growth. Poultry Science, 2005, 84: 256-264.

[4]Zuidhof M J. Mathematical characterization of broiler carcass yield dynamics. Poultry Science, 2005, 84: 1108-1122.

[5]Wang Z, Zuidhof M J. Estimation of growth parameters using a nonlinear mixed Gompertz model. Poultry Science, 2004, 83: 847-852.

[6]Aggrey S E. Logistic nonlinear mixed effects model for estimating growth parameters. Poultry Science, 2009, 88(2): 276-270.

[7]Romero L F, Zuidhof M J, Renema R A, Robinson F E, Naeima A. Nonlinear mixed models to study metabolizable energy utilization in broiler breeder hens. Poultry Science, 2009, 88: 1310-1320.

[8]Sauer N, Emrich K, Piepho H P, Lemme A, Redshaw M S, Mosenthin R. Meta-analysis of the relative efficiency of methionine-hydroxy- analogue-free-acid compared with dl-Methionine in broilers using nonlinear mixed models. Poultry Science, 2008, 87: 2023-2031.

[9]Darmani K, Kebreab E, Lopez S, France J. An evaluation of different growth function for describing the profile of live weight with time(age) in meat and egg strains of chicken. Poultry Science, 2003, 82(7): 1536-1543.

[10]Zanton G I, Heinrichs A J. Evaluation of modeling procedure for fitting in situ feed degradation profiles. Journal of animal Science, 2009, 87: 2080-2088.

[11]Nahashon S N, Aggrey S E, Adefope N A, Amenyenu A, Wright D. Gompertz-Laird model prediction of optimum utilization of crude protein and metabolizable energy by French guinea fowl broilers. Poultry Science, 2010, 89: 52-57.

[12]Porter T, Kebreab E, Kuhi H D, Strathe A B, France J. Flexible alternatives to the Gompertz equation for describing growth with age in turkey hens. Poultry Science, 2010, 89: 371-378.

[13]Vitezica Z G, Marie-Etancelin C, Bernadet X M D. Comparison of nonlinear and spline regression models for describing mule duck growth. Poultry Science, 2010, 89(8): 1778-1784.

[14]Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models. 4th ed. London: Wiley, 2011.

[15]Strathe A B, Danfær A, Sørensen H, Kebreab E. A multilevel nonlinear mixed-effects approach to model growth in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 2010, 88(2): 638-649.

[16]National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed. Washington: National Academy of Sciences, 1994.

[17]Littell R C, Milliken G A, Stroup W W, Wolfinger R D, Schabenberger O. SAS System for Mixed Models. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2006.  

[18]SAS Institute. SAS / STAT User’s Guide. 9.2 version. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2008.

[19]Brown H A, Fitzhugh J R, Cartwright T C. Comparison of nonlinear models for describing weight-age relationships in cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 1976, 42(4): 810-818.

[20]Fitzhugh H A. Analysis of growth curves and strategies for altering their shapes. Journal of Animal Science, 1976, 42(5): 1036-1051.

[21]R Foundation for Statistical Computintg R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www. R-project.org Accessed Oct. 1, 2010.

[22]Pinheiro J, Bates D M. Nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-97. Foundation for statistical computing, 2010.

[23]National Research Council. Microlivestock: Little-known Small Animals with a Promising Economic Future. Washington, D C: National Academy of Sciences, 1991.

[24]Hall D B, Clutter M. Multivariate multilevel nonlinear mixed effects models for timber yield predictions. Biometrics, 2004, 60: 16-24.

[25]Sauvant D, Milgen J V, Faverdin P, Friggens N. Modelling Nutrient Digestion and  Itilisation in Farm Animals. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Press, 2010.
[1] ZHU DaWei,ZHANG LinPing,CHEN MingXue,FANG ChangYun,YU YongHong,ZHENG XiaoLong,SHAO YaFang. Characteristics of High-Quality Rice Varieties and Taste Sensory Evaluation Values in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1271-1283.
[2] WANG YangYang,LIU WanDai,HE Li,REN DeChao,DUAN JianZhao,HU Xin,GUO TianCai,WANG YongHua,FENG Wei. Evaluation of Low Temperature Freezing Injury in Winter Wheat and Difference Analysis of Water Effect Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318.
[3] GOU ZhiWen,YIN Wen,CHAI Qiang,FAN ZhiLong,HU FaLong,ZHAO Cai,YU AiZhong,FAN Hong. Analysis of Sustainability of Multiple Cropping Green Manure in Wheat-Maize Intercropping After Wheat Harvested in Arid Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1319-1331.
[4] WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[5] ZHANG YaLing, GAO Qing, ZHAO Yuhan, LIU Rui, FU Zhongju, LI Xue, SUN Yujia, JIN XueHui. Evaluation of Rice Blast Resistance and Genetic Structure Analysis of Rice Germplasm in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 625-640.
[6] BIAN NengFei, SUN DongLei, GONG JiaLi, WANG Xing, XING XingHua, JIN XiaHong, WANG XiaoJun. Evaluation of Edible Quality of Roasted Peanuts and Indexes Screening [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 641-652.
[7] LI Long, LI ChaoNan, MAO XinGuo, WANG JingYi, JING RuiLian. Advances and Perspectives of Approaches to Phenotyping Crop Root System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 425-437.
[8] SHEN Qian,ZHANG SiPing,LIU RuiHua,LIU ShaoDong,CHEN Jing,GE ChangWei,MA HuiJuan,ZHAO XinHua,YANG GuoZheng,SONG MeiZhen,PANG ChaoYou. Construction of A Comprehensive Evaluation System and Screening of Cold Tolerance Indicators for Cold Tolerance of Cotton at Seedling Emergence Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4342-4355.
[9] HU Xin, ZHANG ZhiLiang, ZHANG Fei, DENG Bo, FANG WeiMin. Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Hybrid Offsprings of Large-Flowered Tea Chrysanthemum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4036-4051.
[10] WeiLi ZHANG,H KOLBE,RenLian ZHANG,DingXiang ZHANG,ZhanGuo BAI,Jing ZHANG,HuaDing SHI. Overview of Soil Survey Works in Main Countries of World [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3565-3583.
[11] Yue GE,DeQuan ZHANG,ShaoBo LI,Li CHEN,XiaoChun ZHENG,Ce LIANG,TongJing YAN,JinHuo LI,ZhenYu WANG. Eating Quality Evaluation of Lamb in Different Postmortem Phases Based on Consumers’ Sensory Preferences [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3640-3651.
[12] SHEN ZhiJun, TIAN Yu, CAI ZhiXiang, XU ZiYuan, YAN Juan, SUN Meng, MA RuiJuan, YU MingLiang. Evaluation of Brown Rot Resistance in Peach Based on Genetic Resources Conserved in National Germplasm Repository of Peach in Nanjing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 3018-3028.
[13] TAN FengLing,ZHAN Ping,WANG Peng,TIAN HongLei. Effects of Thermal Sterilization on Aroma Quality of Flat Peach Juice Based on Sensory Evaluation and GC-MS Combined with OPLS-DA [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2425-2435.
[14] XU Xiao,REN GenZeng,ZHAO XinRui,CHANG JinHua,CUI JiangHui. Accurate Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation of Panicle Phenotypic Traits of Landraces and Cultivars of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
[15] FAN WenJing,LIU Ming,ZHAO Peng,ZHANG QiangQiang,WU DeXiang,GUO PengYu,ZHU XiaoYa,JIN Rong,ZHANG AiJun,TANG ZhongHou. Screening of Sweetpotato Varieties Tolerant to Low Nitrogen at Seedling Stage and Evaluation of Different Nitrogen Efficiencies [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(10): 1891-1902.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!