Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (22): 4441-4450.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.22.016

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Rearing Environment on Physiological and Behavioural Responses of Pigs to Pre-Slaughter Handing, Carcass Straits, and Meat Quality

ZHU Hong-long1, YANG Jie1, XU Xiao-bo1, PAN Xiao-qing1,QIN Feng1, LI Jian1XU Ye-fei2, ZHOU Xiao-yun2, GU Hong-ru1   

  1. 1Institute of Livestock Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanjing 210014
    2Siyang Tianpeng Livestock Co. Ltd, Suqian 223700, Jiangsu
  • Received:2016-04-18 Online:2016-11-16 Published:2016-11-16

Abstract: 【Objective】This study aimed to make a comparative analysis of salivary cortisol level before and after transport, behavior during lairage, blood welfare indicators at slaughter of pigs housed in two rearing environments. Carcass traits and meat quality also were evaluated. 【Method】A total of 144 DLY pigs (half of castrated male and female) with body weight (BW) of 27.08±1.06 kg were randomly assigned into either the concrete floor house (CFH) treatment or the deep litter house (DLH) treatment. Each treatment had 6 pens (6 replicates), and according to the similar rearing density (0.85m2/animal), each replicate for CFH and DLH had 10 and 14 pigs, respectively. Animals had always access to feed and fresh water. Feed intake was recorded during the experimental period, and pigs were weighed individually on day 64 and 106 to get the growth performance. At the end of experiment, 10 pigs (half of castrated male and female) with approximately BW of 105 kg from each treatment were selected for slaughter. Salivary samples were collected at home pens (-60 min), 0 and 120 min during lairage for the cortisol analysis, and behavior video during lairage was recorded for observation of pigs’ behavior. Blood samples at slaughter were collected for the analysis of the plasma level of glucose, lactate, cortisol and creatine kinase (CK). Carcass traits (carcass percentage, carcass drip loss, backfat depth and muscle depth) and meat quality (pH value, meat color, intramuscular fat and drip loss) in Longissimus dorsi (LD) were evaluated. 【Result】 Final body weight, average daily feed intake, average daily gain, and feed/gain ratio of pigs from CFH did not show difference from those of pigs from CFH (P>0.10). DLH pigs had higher salivary cortisol level in the home pen, and 0 and 120 min at lairage after transport than CFH pigs, but salivary cortisol rise at 0 and 120min lairage in DLH pigs as compared with the home pen measurement was lower than in CFH pigs (0 min, + 2.85±0.66 vs. + 5.08±1.33, P<0.01; 120 min, + 1.03±0.63 vs. + 2.66±1.54, P=0.04). There were no differences in pigs spending time in resting, standing, exploring, walking, fighting and drinking between DLH and CFH during 0-60 min at lairage (P>0.10). During 60-90 min, however, CFH pigs spent more time in exploring, walking and fighting compared with DLH pigs (P<0.05). Compared with CFH pigs, DLH pigs at slaughter had similar plasma glucose level (P>0.10), but lower levels of lactate and CK, and a higher tendency for cortisol level (P=0.07). Carcass percentage, carcass drip loss, backfat depth and muscle depth from DLH pigs did not show difference from those of from CFH pigs (P>0.10). Concerning the meat quality, DLH tended to have more intramuscular fat content and less drip loss in LD (P=0.10), whereas pH45min, pH24h and meat color (L*, a* and b*) were unaffected (P>0.10).【Conclusion】DLH could decrease time spent in fighting behavior during lairage and physiological response to pre-slaughter handling in pigs. These data showed DLH could improve the ability to copy with pre-slaughter stress in pigs. However, DLH had no effects on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality.

Key words: rearing environment, pig, pre-slaughter behavior, salivary cortisol, carcass strait, meat quality

[1]    TERLOUW C. Stress reactions at slaughter and meat quality in pigs: genetic background and prior experience: A brief review of recent findings. Livestock Production Science, 2005, 94: 125-135.
[2]    温朋飞, 刘洪贵, 王希彪, 崔世全,包军. 富集环境对育肥猪生产性能及胴体肉品质影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2016, 47: 62-68.
WEN P F, LIU H G, WANG X B, CUI S Q, BAO J. Effect of enriched environment on performance, carcass traits and meat quality of finishing pigs. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2016, 47: 62-68. (in Chinese)
[3]    刘洪贵. 不同福利措施及品种对母猪的行为、生理、免疫、健康及生产性能的影响[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2013.
LIU H G. Effect of the different welfare measures and breeds on behaviors, physiology, immunization, healthy and productivity indicator of pigs [D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[4]    GEVERINK N A, DE JONG I C, LAMBOOIJ E, BLOKHUIS H J, WIEGANT V M. Influence of housing conditions on responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for meat quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 1999, 79: 285-291.
[5]    DE JONG I C, PRELLE I T, VAN DE BURGWAL J A, LAMBOOIJ E, KORTE S M, BLOKHUIS H J, KOOLHAAS J M. Effects of rearing conditions on behavioural and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling and mixing at transport. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2000, 80: 451-458.
[6]    FOURY A, LEBRET B, CHEVILLON P, VAUTIER A, TERLOUW C, MORMÈDE P. Alternative rearing systems in pigs: consequences on stress indicators at slaughter and meat quality. Animal, 2011, 5: 1620-1625.
[7]    KLONT R E, HULSEGGE B, HOVING-BOLINK A H, GERRITZEN M A, KURT E, WINKELMAN-GOEDHART H A, DE JONG I C, KRANEN R W. Relationships between behavioral and meat quality characteristics of pigs raised under barren and enriched housing conditions. Journal of Animal Science, 2001, 79: 2835-2843.
[8]    LEBRET B, MEUNIER-SALAÜN M C, FOURY A, MORMÈDE P, DRANSFIELD E, DOURMAD J Y. Influence of rearing conditions on performance, behavioral, and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling, carcass traits, and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science, 2006, 84: 2436-2447.
[9]    GADE P B. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: comparison of outdoor and conventionally raised pigs. Animal, 2008, 2: 902-911.
[10]   唐建阳,郑雪芳,刘波,蓝江林,卢舒娴,胡桂萍.微生物发酵床养殖方式下仔猪行为特征.畜牧与兽医,2012, 44: 34-38.
TANG J Y, ZHENG X F, LIU B, LAN J L, LU S X, HU G P. Effect of microbial-fermentation bed on the behavioral patterns in weaned piglets. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2012, 48: 34-38. (in Chinese)
[11]   朱洪龙,杨杰,李健,潘孝青,秦枫,周忠凯,冯国兴,顾洪如. 两种饲养方式下仔猪生产性能、行为和唾液皮质醇水平的对比分析. 中国农业科学,2016,49:1382-1390.
ZHU H L, YANG J, LI J, PAN X Q, QIN F, ZHOU Z K, FENG G X, GU H R. Comparative analysis of growth performance, behavior, and salivary cortisol hormone of piglets housed in two rearing environments. Scientia Agricultura Sinic), 2016, 49: 1382-1390. (in Chinese
[12]   MORRISON R S, HEMSWORTH P H, CAMPBELL R G, CRONIN G M. The social and feeding behaviour of growing pigs in deep-litter, group housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2003, 82: 173-188.
[13]   MORRISON R S, JOHNSTON L J, HILBRANDS A M. The behaviour, welfare, growth performance and meat quality of pigs housed in a deep-litter, large group housing system compared to a conventional confinement system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2007, 103: 12-24.
[14]   DE JONG I C, PRELLE I T, VAN DE BURGWAL J A, LAMBOOIJ E, KORTE S M, BLOKHUIS H J, KOOLHAAS J M. Effects of environmental enrichment on behavioral responses to novelty, learning, and memory, and the circadian rhythm in cortisol in growing pigs. Physiology & Behavior, 2000, 68: 571-578.
[15]   夏安琪,李欣,陈丽,何凡,刘金凯,王振宇,倪娜,张德权. 不同宰前禁食时间对羊肉品质影响的研究. 中国农业科学,2014,47:145-153.
XIA A Q, Li X, CHEN Li, HE F, LIU J K, WANG Z Y, NI N, ZHANG D Q. Effects of different pre-slaughter fasting time on mutton quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinic, 2014, 47: 145-153. (in Chinese)
[16]   包军. 动物福利与健康养殖.饲料工业, 2012, 12: 1-3.
BAO J. Animal welfare and health feeding. Feed Industry, 2012, 12: 1-3. (in Chinese)
[17]   DÉSAUTÉS C, SARRIEAU A, CARITEZ J C, MORMÈDE P. Behavior and pituitary-adrenal function in large white and Meishan pigs. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 1999, 16: 193-205.
[18]   TERLOUW E M C, RYBARCZYK P. Explaining and predicting differences in meat quality through stress reactions at slaughter: The case of Large White and Duroc pigs. Meat Science, 2008, 79: 795-805.
[19]   WANG L N, CHEN X L, LI X G, SHU G, YAN H C, WANG X Q. Evaluation of adrenocorticotropin regulated glucocorticoid synthesis pathway in adrenal of different breeds of pigs. Livestock Science, 2014, 169: 185-191.
[20]   KANITZ E, OTTEN W, TUCHSCHERER M, GRÄBNER M, BRÜSSOW K P, REHFELDT C, METGES C C. High and low protein:carbohydrate dietary ratios during gestation alter maternal- fetal cortisol regulation in pigs. Plos One, 2012, 7: e52748.
[21]   GADE P B. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: comparison of free range and conventionally raised pigs. Animal, 2008, 2: 1238-1246.
[22]   LEBRET B, PRUNIER A, BONHOMME N, FOURY A, MORMÈDE P, DOURMAD J Y. Physiological traits and meat quality of pigs as affected by genotype and housing system. Meat Science, 2011, 88: 14-22.
[23]   ADCOCK R J, KATTESH H G, ROBERTS M P, CARROLL J A, SAXTON A M, KOJIMA C J. Temporal relationships between plasma cortisol, corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), and the free cortisol index (FCI) in pigs in response to adrenal stimulation or suppression. Stress, 2007, 10: 305-310.
[24]   吴买生, 唐国其, 陈斌, 贺长青, 罗强华, 刘天明, 向拥军, 李朝辉.发酵床猪舍对育肥猪生长性能及肉品质的影响. 家畜生态学报, 2010, 31: 39-43.
WU M S, TANG G Q, CHEN B, HE C Q, LUO Q H, LIU T M, XIANG Y J, LI Z H. Effects of growth performance and meat quality on finishing pigs in fermented floor (Bio-Bed) system. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology, 2010, 31: 39-43. (in Chinese)
[25]   ZHOU C S, HU J J, ZHANG B, TAN Z L. Gaseous emissions, growth performance and pork quality of pigs housed in deep-litter system compared to concrete-floor system. Animal Science Journal, 2015, 86: 422-427.
[26]   贾金生. 生物发酵床对猪生长性能、胴体品质和健康的影响 [D]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2011.
JIA J S. The effect of biological fermentation bed on growth performance, carcass quality and health in growing-pigs [D]. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University, 2011. (in Chinese)
[27]   JOHNSTON L J, MORRISON R S. Growth performance and carcass quality of pigs housed in hoop barns fed diets containing alternative ingredients [R]. Minnesota: West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, 2004.
[28]   CHEN T, ZHOU G H, XU X L, ZHAO G M, LI C B. Phospholipase A2 and antioxidant enzyme activities in normal and PSE pork. Meat Science, 2010, 84: 143-146.
[29]   O’NEILLA D J, LYNCH P B, TROY D J, BUCKLEY D J, KERRY J P. Influence of the time of year on the incidence of PSE and DFD in Irish pigmeat. Meat Science, 2003, 64: 105-111.
[30]   NANNI COSTA L, FIEGO D P L, DALL'OLIO S, DAVOLI R, RUSSO V. Influence of loading method and stocking density during transport on meat and dry-cured ham quality in pigs with different halothane genotypes. Meat Science, 1999, 51: 391-399.
[31]   WARRISS P D, BROWN S N. The relationship between reflectance (EEL value) and colour (L*) in pork loins. Animal Science, 1995, 61: 145-147.
[32]   周利华, 郭源梅, 段艳宇, 张志燕, 杨凯旋, 麻骏武.在白色杜洛克×二花脸资源家系中定位影响猪肉滴水损失的QTL.中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 2131-2138.
ZHOU L H, GUOY M, DUAN Y Y, ZHANG Z Y, YANG K X, MA J W. QTL mapping for drip Loss in a White Duroc × Erhualian F2 resource population. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44: 2131-2138. (in Chinese)
[33]   杨杰, 周李生, 刘先先, 马焕班, 谢贤华, 熊信威, 候利娟, 黄弋轩, 陈从英, 麻骏武. 莱芜猪与杜长大三元杂交猪肉质性状种质资源比较研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2014, 45: 1752-1759.
YANG J, ZHOU L S, LIU X X, MA H B, XIE X H, XIONG X W, HOU L J, HUANG Y X, CHEN C Y, MA J W. A comparative study of meat quality traits between Laiwu and DLY pigs. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2014, 45(11): 1752-1759. (in Chinese)
[1] TAN XianMing,ZHANG JiaWei,WANG ZhongLin,CHEN JunXu,YANG Feng,YANG WenYu. Prediction of Maize Yield in Relay Strip Intercropping Under Different Water and Nitrogen Conditions Based on PLS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138.
[2] CHEN XueSen, YIN HuaLin, WANG Nan, ZHANG Min, JIANG ShengHui, XU Juan, MAO ZhiQuan, ZHANG ZongYing, WANG ZhiGang, JIANG ZhaoTao, XU YueHua, LI JianMing. Interpretation of the Case of Bud Sports Selection to Promote the High-Quality and Efficient Development of the World’s Apple and Citrus Industry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 755-768.
[3] SONG ShuZhen, GAO LiangShuang, LI Hong, GONG XuYin, LIU LiShan, WEI YuBing. Effects of Feeding Levels on Muscle Tissue Structure and Muscle Fiber Composition Related Genes in Sheep [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4304-4314.
[4] MingJie XING,XianHong GU,XiaoHong WANG,Yue HAO. Effects of IL-15 Overexpression on Myoblast Differentiation of Porcine Skeletal Muscle Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3652-3663.
[5] YANG ChangPei,WANG NaiXiu,WANG Kai,HUANG ZiQing,LIN HaiLan,ZHANG Li,ZHANG Chen,FENG LuQiu,GAN Ling. Effects and Mechanisms of Exogenous GABA Against Oxidative Stress in Piglets [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3437-3449.
[6] LIU WangJing,TANG DeFu,AO ChangJin. Effect of Allium mongolicum Regel and Its Extracts on the Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality and Serum Biochemical Indices of Captive Small-Tailed Han Sheep [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3461-3472.
[7] DENG FuLi,SHEN Dan,ZHONG RuQing,ZHANG ShunFen,LI Tao,SUN ShuDong,CHEN Liang,ZHANG HongFu. Non-Starch Polysaccharide Enzymes Cocktail of Corn-Miscellaneous Meal-Based Diet Optimization by In Vitro Method and Its Effects on Intestinal Microbiome in Finishing Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3242-3255.
[8] JIN MengJiao,LIU Bo,WANG KangKang,ZHANG GuangZhong,QIAN WanQiang,WAN FangHao. Light Energy Utilization and Response of Chlorophyll Synthesis Under Different Light Intensities in Mikania micrantha [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2347-2359.
[9] HU RongRong,DING ShiJie,GUO Yun,ZHU HaoZhe,CHEN YiChun,LIU Zheng,DING Xi,TANG ChangBo,ZHOU GuangHong. Effects of Trolox on Proliferation and Differentiation of Pig Muscle Stem Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5290-5301.
[10] ZHANG Lan,WANG LiangZhi,HUANG YanLing,LIAO XiuDong,ZHANG LiYang,LÜ Lin,LUO XuGang. Effects of Dietary Supplemental Pattern of Trace Eloments on the Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(22): 4906-4916.
[11] TANG ZhenShuang,YIN Dong,YIN LiLin,MA YunLong,XIANG Tao,ZHU MengJin,YU Mei,LIU XiaoLei,LI XinYun,QIU XiaoTian,ZHAO ShuHong. To Evaluate the “Two-Step” Genomic Selection Strategy in Pig by Simulation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4677-4684.
[12] ZHANG DanDan,XU TengTeng,GAO Di,QI Xin,NING Wei,RU ZhenYuan,ZHANG XiangDong,GUO TengLong,SHENTU LuYan,YU Tong,MA YangYang,LI YunSheng,ZHANG YunHai,CAO ZuBing. Transcription Factor TEAD4 Regulates Early Embryonic Development in Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4456-4465.
[13] SHI Jiang,WANG JiaTong,PENG QunHua,LÜ Haipeng,BALDERMANN Susanne,LIN Zhi. Changes in Lipid-Soluble Pigments in Fresh Tea Leaves Treated by Methyl Jasmonate and During Postharvest Oolong Tea Manufacturing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3984-3997.
[14] DU Xing,ZENG Qiang,LIU Lu,LI QiQi,YANG Liu,PAN ZengXiang,LI QiFa. Identification of the Core Promoter of Linc-NORFA and Its Transcriptional Regulation in Erhualian Pig [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3331-3342.
[15] YU ZhengWang,ZHOU ZhongXin. Functions of Antibacterial and Inducing Defense Peptide Expression of Medium-Chain Fatty Acid and Its Application in Piglet Feeds [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2895-2905.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!