Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (22): 4441-4450.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.22.016

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Rearing Environment on Physiological and Behavioural Responses of Pigs to Pre-Slaughter Handing, Carcass Straits, and Meat Quality

ZHU Hong-long1, YANG Jie1, XU Xiao-bo1, PAN Xiao-qing1,QIN Feng1, LI Jian1XU Ye-fei2, ZHOU Xiao-yun2, GU Hong-ru1   

  1. 1Institute of Livestock Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanjing 210014
    2Siyang Tianpeng Livestock Co. Ltd, Suqian 223700, Jiangsu
  • Received:2016-04-18 Online:2016-11-16 Published:2016-11-16

Abstract: 【Objective】This study aimed to make a comparative analysis of salivary cortisol level before and after transport, behavior during lairage, blood welfare indicators at slaughter of pigs housed in two rearing environments. Carcass traits and meat quality also were evaluated. 【Method】A total of 144 DLY pigs (half of castrated male and female) with body weight (BW) of 27.08±1.06 kg were randomly assigned into either the concrete floor house (CFH) treatment or the deep litter house (DLH) treatment. Each treatment had 6 pens (6 replicates), and according to the similar rearing density (0.85m2/animal), each replicate for CFH and DLH had 10 and 14 pigs, respectively. Animals had always access to feed and fresh water. Feed intake was recorded during the experimental period, and pigs were weighed individually on day 64 and 106 to get the growth performance. At the end of experiment, 10 pigs (half of castrated male and female) with approximately BW of 105 kg from each treatment were selected for slaughter. Salivary samples were collected at home pens (-60 min), 0 and 120 min during lairage for the cortisol analysis, and behavior video during lairage was recorded for observation of pigs’ behavior. Blood samples at slaughter were collected for the analysis of the plasma level of glucose, lactate, cortisol and creatine kinase (CK). Carcass traits (carcass percentage, carcass drip loss, backfat depth and muscle depth) and meat quality (pH value, meat color, intramuscular fat and drip loss) in Longissimus dorsi (LD) were evaluated. 【Result】 Final body weight, average daily feed intake, average daily gain, and feed/gain ratio of pigs from CFH did not show difference from those of pigs from CFH (P>0.10). DLH pigs had higher salivary cortisol level in the home pen, and 0 and 120 min at lairage after transport than CFH pigs, but salivary cortisol rise at 0 and 120min lairage in DLH pigs as compared with the home pen measurement was lower than in CFH pigs (0 min, + 2.85±0.66 vs. + 5.08±1.33, P<0.01; 120 min, + 1.03±0.63 vs. + 2.66±1.54, P=0.04). There were no differences in pigs spending time in resting, standing, exploring, walking, fighting and drinking between DLH and CFH during 0-60 min at lairage (P>0.10). During 60-90 min, however, CFH pigs spent more time in exploring, walking and fighting compared with DLH pigs (P<0.05). Compared with CFH pigs, DLH pigs at slaughter had similar plasma glucose level (P>0.10), but lower levels of lactate and CK, and a higher tendency for cortisol level (P=0.07). Carcass percentage, carcass drip loss, backfat depth and muscle depth from DLH pigs did not show difference from those of from CFH pigs (P>0.10). Concerning the meat quality, DLH tended to have more intramuscular fat content and less drip loss in LD (P=0.10), whereas pH45min, pH24h and meat color (L*, a* and b*) were unaffected (P>0.10).【Conclusion】DLH could decrease time spent in fighting behavior during lairage and physiological response to pre-slaughter handling in pigs. These data showed DLH could improve the ability to copy with pre-slaughter stress in pigs. However, DLH had no effects on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality.

Key words: rearing environment, pig, pre-slaughter behavior, salivary cortisol, carcass strait, meat quality

[1]    TERLOUW C. Stress reactions at slaughter and meat quality in pigs: genetic background and prior experience: A brief review of recent findings. Livestock Production Science, 2005, 94: 125-135.
[2]    温朋飞, 刘洪贵, 王希彪, 崔世全,包军. 富集环境对育肥猪生产性能及胴体肉品质影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2016, 47: 62-68.
WEN P F, LIU H G, WANG X B, CUI S Q, BAO J. Effect of enriched environment on performance, carcass traits and meat quality of finishing pigs. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2016, 47: 62-68. (in Chinese)
[3]    刘洪贵. 不同福利措施及品种对母猪的行为、生理、免疫、健康及生产性能的影响[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2013.
LIU H G. Effect of the different welfare measures and breeds on behaviors, physiology, immunization, healthy and productivity indicator of pigs [D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[4]    GEVERINK N A, DE JONG I C, LAMBOOIJ E, BLOKHUIS H J, WIEGANT V M. Influence of housing conditions on responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for meat quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 1999, 79: 285-291.
[5]    DE JONG I C, PRELLE I T, VAN DE BURGWAL J A, LAMBOOIJ E, KORTE S M, BLOKHUIS H J, KOOLHAAS J M. Effects of rearing conditions on behavioural and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling and mixing at transport. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2000, 80: 451-458.
[6]    FOURY A, LEBRET B, CHEVILLON P, VAUTIER A, TERLOUW C, MORMÈDE P. Alternative rearing systems in pigs: consequences on stress indicators at slaughter and meat quality. Animal, 2011, 5: 1620-1625.
[7]    KLONT R E, HULSEGGE B, HOVING-BOLINK A H, GERRITZEN M A, KURT E, WINKELMAN-GOEDHART H A, DE JONG I C, KRANEN R W. Relationships between behavioral and meat quality characteristics of pigs raised under barren and enriched housing conditions. Journal of Animal Science, 2001, 79: 2835-2843.
[8]    LEBRET B, MEUNIER-SALAÜN M C, FOURY A, MORMÈDE P, DRANSFIELD E, DOURMAD J Y. Influence of rearing conditions on performance, behavioral, and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling, carcass traits, and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science, 2006, 84: 2436-2447.
[9]    GADE P B. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: comparison of outdoor and conventionally raised pigs. Animal, 2008, 2: 902-911.
[10]   唐建阳,郑雪芳,刘波,蓝江林,卢舒娴,胡桂萍.微生物发酵床养殖方式下仔猪行为特征.畜牧与兽医,2012, 44: 34-38.
TANG J Y, ZHENG X F, LIU B, LAN J L, LU S X, HU G P. Effect of microbial-fermentation bed on the behavioral patterns in weaned piglets. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2012, 48: 34-38. (in Chinese)
[11]   朱洪龙,杨杰,李健,潘孝青,秦枫,周忠凯,冯国兴,顾洪如. 两种饲养方式下仔猪生产性能、行为和唾液皮质醇水平的对比分析. 中国农业科学,2016,49:1382-1390.
ZHU H L, YANG J, LI J, PAN X Q, QIN F, ZHOU Z K, FENG G X, GU H R. Comparative analysis of growth performance, behavior, and salivary cortisol hormone of piglets housed in two rearing environments. Scientia Agricultura Sinic), 2016, 49: 1382-1390. (in Chinese
[12]   MORRISON R S, HEMSWORTH P H, CAMPBELL R G, CRONIN G M. The social and feeding behaviour of growing pigs in deep-litter, group housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2003, 82: 173-188.
[13]   MORRISON R S, JOHNSTON L J, HILBRANDS A M. The behaviour, welfare, growth performance and meat quality of pigs housed in a deep-litter, large group housing system compared to a conventional confinement system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2007, 103: 12-24.
[14]   DE JONG I C, PRELLE I T, VAN DE BURGWAL J A, LAMBOOIJ E, KORTE S M, BLOKHUIS H J, KOOLHAAS J M. Effects of environmental enrichment on behavioral responses to novelty, learning, and memory, and the circadian rhythm in cortisol in growing pigs. Physiology & Behavior, 2000, 68: 571-578.
[15]   夏安琪,李欣,陈丽,何凡,刘金凯,王振宇,倪娜,张德权. 不同宰前禁食时间对羊肉品质影响的研究. 中国农业科学,2014,47:145-153.
XIA A Q, Li X, CHEN Li, HE F, LIU J K, WANG Z Y, NI N, ZHANG D Q. Effects of different pre-slaughter fasting time on mutton quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinic, 2014, 47: 145-153. (in Chinese)
[16]   包军. 动物福利与健康养殖.饲料工业, 2012, 12: 1-3.
BAO J. Animal welfare and health feeding. Feed Industry, 2012, 12: 1-3. (in Chinese)
[17]   DÉSAUTÉS C, SARRIEAU A, CARITEZ J C, MORMÈDE P. Behavior and pituitary-adrenal function in large white and Meishan pigs. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 1999, 16: 193-205.
[18]   TERLOUW E M C, RYBARCZYK P. Explaining and predicting differences in meat quality through stress reactions at slaughter: The case of Large White and Duroc pigs. Meat Science, 2008, 79: 795-805.
[19]   WANG L N, CHEN X L, LI X G, SHU G, YAN H C, WANG X Q. Evaluation of adrenocorticotropin regulated glucocorticoid synthesis pathway in adrenal of different breeds of pigs. Livestock Science, 2014, 169: 185-191.
[20]   KANITZ E, OTTEN W, TUCHSCHERER M, GRÄBNER M, BRÜSSOW K P, REHFELDT C, METGES C C. High and low protein:carbohydrate dietary ratios during gestation alter maternal- fetal cortisol regulation in pigs. Plos One, 2012, 7: e52748.
[21]   GADE P B. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: comparison of free range and conventionally raised pigs. Animal, 2008, 2: 1238-1246.
[22]   LEBRET B, PRUNIER A, BONHOMME N, FOURY A, MORMÈDE P, DOURMAD J Y. Physiological traits and meat quality of pigs as affected by genotype and housing system. Meat Science, 2011, 88: 14-22.
[23]   ADCOCK R J, KATTESH H G, ROBERTS M P, CARROLL J A, SAXTON A M, KOJIMA C J. Temporal relationships between plasma cortisol, corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), and the free cortisol index (FCI) in pigs in response to adrenal stimulation or suppression. Stress, 2007, 10: 305-310.
[24]   吴买生, 唐国其, 陈斌, 贺长青, 罗强华, 刘天明, 向拥军, 李朝辉.发酵床猪舍对育肥猪生长性能及肉品质的影响. 家畜生态学报, 2010, 31: 39-43.
WU M S, TANG G Q, CHEN B, HE C Q, LUO Q H, LIU T M, XIANG Y J, LI Z H. Effects of growth performance and meat quality on finishing pigs in fermented floor (Bio-Bed) system. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology, 2010, 31: 39-43. (in Chinese)
[25]   ZHOU C S, HU J J, ZHANG B, TAN Z L. Gaseous emissions, growth performance and pork quality of pigs housed in deep-litter system compared to concrete-floor system. Animal Science Journal, 2015, 86: 422-427.
[26]   贾金生. 生物发酵床对猪生长性能、胴体品质和健康的影响 [D]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2011.
JIA J S. The effect of biological fermentation bed on growth performance, carcass quality and health in growing-pigs [D]. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University, 2011. (in Chinese)
[27]   JOHNSTON L J, MORRISON R S. Growth performance and carcass quality of pigs housed in hoop barns fed diets containing alternative ingredients [R]. Minnesota: West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, 2004.
[28]   CHEN T, ZHOU G H, XU X L, ZHAO G M, LI C B. Phospholipase A2 and antioxidant enzyme activities in normal and PSE pork. Meat Science, 2010, 84: 143-146.
[29]   O’NEILLA D J, LYNCH P B, TROY D J, BUCKLEY D J, KERRY J P. Influence of the time of year on the incidence of PSE and DFD in Irish pigmeat. Meat Science, 2003, 64: 105-111.
[30]   NANNI COSTA L, FIEGO D P L, DALL'OLIO S, DAVOLI R, RUSSO V. Influence of loading method and stocking density during transport on meat and dry-cured ham quality in pigs with different halothane genotypes. Meat Science, 1999, 51: 391-399.
[31]   WARRISS P D, BROWN S N. The relationship between reflectance (EEL value) and colour (L*) in pork loins. Animal Science, 1995, 61: 145-147.
[32]   周利华, 郭源梅, 段艳宇, 张志燕, 杨凯旋, 麻骏武.在白色杜洛克×二花脸资源家系中定位影响猪肉滴水损失的QTL.中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 2131-2138.
ZHOU L H, GUOY M, DUAN Y Y, ZHANG Z Y, YANG K X, MA J W. QTL mapping for drip Loss in a White Duroc × Erhualian F2 resource population. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44: 2131-2138. (in Chinese)
[33]   杨杰, 周李生, 刘先先, 马焕班, 谢贤华, 熊信威, 候利娟, 黄弋轩, 陈从英, 麻骏武. 莱芜猪与杜长大三元杂交猪肉质性状种质资源比较研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2014, 45: 1752-1759.
YANG J, ZHOU L S, LIU X X, MA H B, XIE X H, XIONG X W, HOU L J, HUANG Y X, CHEN C Y, MA J W. A comparative study of meat quality traits between Laiwu and DLY pigs. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2014, 45(11): 1752-1759. (in Chinese)
[1] WANG ShaoHua, FAN QiuLi, YANG JinChang, SUN YuJie, YU Niu, JIANG ShouQun. Effects of Different Levels of Mytilaria laosensis Leaves Feeding on Growth Performance, Immune Function, Antioxidant Capacity, Carcass Quality and Meat Quality of Yellow-Feathered Chickens [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1111-1127.
[2] ZHOU Qi, ZHANG ShiHao, ZHANG Liang, PAN Yu, ZHANG LiJuan, TU Zhi, PAN HongMei, LONG Xi. Prediction of the Potential Habitat Suitability of Luopanshan Pigs in Chongqing Based on the Optimized MaxEnt Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 205-219.
[3] WANG JiYing, LI JingXuan, WANG YanPing, GUO JianFeng, LIN HaiChao, ZHAO XueYan. Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis Reveals Potential Candidate Genes Affecting Fat Deposition in Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1845-1855.
[4] JIN YiDan, HE NiQing, CHENG ZhaoPing, LIN ShaoJun, HUANG FengHuang, BAI KangCheng, ZHANG Tao, WANG WenXiao, YU MinXiang, YANG DeWei. Screening and Identification of Pigm-1 Interaction Proteins for Disease Resistance of Rice Blast [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1043-1051.
[5] LIU Jing, ZHAO ShiLin, YANG XiaoTing, WEI YiXuan, LI JiaPeng, ZHAO Yan. Study on the Origin Traceability of Beijing Black Pig Based on Stable Isotope Technology [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 5071-5080.
[6] GAO Rong, LI HengYu, CHEN LiJuan, MA HuiLing. Physiological Effects of 5-AzaC on Alleviating Salt‑Alkali Stress in Alfalfa and Its Impact on the Expression of DNA Methylation Enzyme Genes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4482-4496.
[7] GAO XiaoPing, PAN HongMei, GUO ZongYi, ZHANG JunJie, LIN Yan, ZHANG Liang. Post-Freezing Quality and Targeted Lipidomics Analysis of Rongchang Pig Spermatozoa with Different Freezing Tolerance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 387-400.
[8] ZHANG HuaPeng, ZHANG QingZe, HE Fan, QI MengFan, FU BinBin, LI QingChun, LI MengXun, MA LiPeng, LIU Yi, HUANG Tao. Cloning and Identification of Differentially Expressed lncRNAs in Follicles of Meishan Pigs and Duroc Pigs with Their Correlation Analysis with miRNAs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1807-1819.
[9] ZHAO ZhenJian, WANG Kai, CHEN Dong, SHEN Qi, YU Yang, CUI ShengDi, WANG JunGe, CHEN ZiYang, YU ShiXin, CHEN JiaMiao, WANG XiangFeng, TANG GuoQing. Integrated Aanalysis of Genome and DNA Methylation for Screening Key Genes Related to Pork Quality Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(7): 1394-1406.
[10] LIU ZhuoLin, LIU HongYun. The Potential and Mechanisms of Apigenin to Relieve Heat Stress and Hypoxia in Dairy Cows Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(5): 1010-1022.
[11] ZHOU YuanQing, DONG HongMin, ZHU ZhiPing, WANG Yue, LI NanXi. Review on Carbon Footprint Assessment of Pig Farming System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(2): 379-389.
[12] CAI RuiJie, CHU YiXin, SHI XinE, JIN JianJun, YANG GongShe. Dietary Addition of Cordyceps Militaris Can Alleviate Lipopolysaccharide- Induced Liver Damage and Skeletal Muscle Protein Degradation in Early Weaning Piglets [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(12): 2467-2482.
[13] LIU YanLing, QIU Ao, ZHANG ZiPeng, WANG Xue, DU HeHe, LUO WenXue, WANG GuiJiang, WEI Xia, SHI WenYing, DING XiangDong. The Efficiency of Haplotype-Based Genomic Selection Using Genotyping by Target Sequencing in Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(11): 2243-2253.
[14] REN ZhiQiang, WANG ChenYang, KOU ZhongYun, CAI Rui, YANG GongShe, PANG WeiJun. In Vivo Estimation of Lean Percentage, Fat Percentage, and Intramuscular Fat Content of Boars by Computed Tomography [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(9): 1787-1799.
[15] JU XiaoJun, ZHANG Ming, SHAN YanJu, JI GaiGe, TU YunJie, LIU YiFan, ZOU JianMin, SHU JingTing. Chicken Quality Analysis and Screening of Key Flavor Substances and Genes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(9): 1813-1826.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!