Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (21): 4677-4684.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.21.016

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCE·RESOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

To Evaluate the “Two-Step” Genomic Selection Strategy in Pig by Simulation

TANG ZhenShuang1(),YIN Dong1,YIN LiLin1,MA YunLong1,XIANG Tao1,ZHU MengJin1,YU Mei1,LIU XiaoLei1,LI XinYun1,QIU XiaoTian2,*(),ZHAO ShuHong1,*()   

  1. 1College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University /Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Livestock, Wuhan 430070
    2National Animal Husbandry Service, Beijing 100107
  • Received:2020-10-19 Accepted:2021-02-04 Online:2021-11-01 Published:2021-11-09
  • Contact: XiaoTian QIU,ShuHong ZHAO E-mail:zst@webmail.hzau.edu.cn;23753846@QQ.com;shzhao@mail.hzau.edu.cn

Abstract:

【Background】 Since genomic selection (GS) was proposed by MEUWISSEN et al. in 2001, it has been widely used in the breeding of dairy cows, pigs, and other livestock, and has significantly improved the speed of genetic gain of various economic traits. In 2017, with the organization and coordination of the National Grazing Headquarter Station and within the framework of the National Swine Improvement Program, the genomic selection platform for pig breeding was officially launched. Although genomic selection has made positive achievements in pig breeding, and the developing of advanced genotyping technology reduced the costs dramatically, some issues were still existed, including the insufficient number of genotyped individuals in majority of core breeding farms and the inappropriate implementation processes has restricted its wide application in practice.【Objective】In combination with the actual situation of domestic pig breeding, the “two-step” strategy for genomic selection was proposed in this study, that is, the off-test evaluation and the early-stage prediction. Off-test evaluation referred to the genetic evaluation of replacement pigs by SSGBLUP after off-test, and early-stage prediction was carried out when the number of chips reached a certain scale. 【Method】 In this study, the 50 K chip datasets of three breeds consisting of Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire were used as the base group to simulate the large-scale population of different breeds, respectively. The four generations were simulated: the first three generations were treated as the base population, and the fourth generation as the test population, two traits with medium and low heritability was simulated for each individual. The estimated breeding values of SSGBLUP and traditional BLUP model for different traits were calculated by the pig genomic selection platform based on the HIBLUP software. The predictive performance of early-stage was evaluated according to whether the individual’s testing records have influence their genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) in test population. 【Result】The results showed that the predictive performance of off-test evaluation and early-stage for traits with medium heritability were better than those with low heritability. The selection accuracy of SSGBLUP was better than traditional BLUP. Moreover, with the increase of the number of chips and the expansion of the population size, the prediction accuracy was higher. The early-stage predictive performance of SSGBLUP was better than that of traditional BLUP, the early-stage prediction could be carried out when the number of genotyped pigs reached about 2 000, and castrating the last 30% individuals according to GEBV could ensure that the top 1% excellent individuals would not be mistakenly eliminated. And the prediction accuracy performance was increasing with the increased number of genotyped pigs. 【Conclusion】 The “two-step” strategy pretty was conformed to the state of domestic breeding program, and was easy to implement and promote the pig breeding in China. When the number of genotyped pigs was small, off-test evaluation could be carried out to improve the accuracy of selection, as well as efficiency, to a certain extent; when the number of genotyped pigs was large, early-stage prediction could be performed by castrating the pigs on the lower rank of GEBV, which could increase the amount of testing for more excellent pigs, and could also strength the selection intensity and accelerate the genetic gain. The “two-step” strategy was in line with the actual requirements of genomic selection in pig industry. The implementation of this strategy could further promote the application of genomic selection and speed up the genetic gain in pig breeding.

Key words: genomic selection, pig, two-step, off-test evaluation, early-stage prediction

Table 1

The parameters of simulation"

类型 Type 参数Parameter
遗传力Heritability 性状1为0.3,性状2为0.1 Trait 1 is 0.3, trait 2 is 0.1
QTN的数目及效应 The number of QTN and effect 100个QTNs,正态分布 100 QTNS, normal distribution
留种率Fraction selected 杜洛克:母猪15%、公猪1% Duroc: dam 15%, sire 1%
长白:母猪10%、公猪1% Landrace: dam 10%, sire 1%
大白:母猪10%、公猪1% Yorkshire: dam 10%, sire 1%
每窝公母猪比例 Ratio of sires and dams per litter 1:1
产仔数Litter size 杜洛克:8头;长白:13头;大白:14头 Duroc: 8; Landrace: 13; Yorkshire: 14
群体更新率Population renewal rate 母猪为60%,公猪为100% Dam: 60%, Sire: 100%
群体结构Population structure
N1

N2

N3

N4(待选)To be selected

杜洛克母猪:1000头;长白母猪:500头;大白母猪:2000头;各品种公猪:30头
The dam number of Duroc, Landrace, Yorkshire is 1000, 500, 2000; The sire number of all breeds is 30
杜洛克母猪:1000头;长白母猪:500头;大白母猪:2000头;各品种公猪:30头
The dam number of Duroc, Landrace, Yorkshire is 1000, 500, 2000; The sire number of all breeds is 30
杜洛克母猪:1000头;长白母猪:500头;大白母猪:2000头;各品种公猪:30头
The dam number of Duroc, Landrace, Yorkshire is 1000, 500, 2000; The sire number of all breeds is 30
杜洛克:8000头;长白:6500头;大白:28000头
The number of Duroc, Landrace, Yorkshire is 8000, 6500, 28000
表型个体 Phenotype N1—N3 每个世代抽取50%的个体,N4世代
The 50% individuals in 1-3 generation and all individuals in 4 generation
基因型个体 Genotype N1—N3世代共抽取1000头或3000头,N4世代抽取10%或30%的个体
Total 1000 or 3000 individuals 1-3 generation and 10% or 30% individuals in 4 generation

Table 2

The overview of three breeds data"

品种
Breed
表型Phenotype 系谱Pedigree 基因型Genotype
基础群体
Base population
测试群体
Test population
基础群体
Base population
测试群体
Test population
基础群体
Base population
测试群体
Test population
杜洛克Duroc 10500 7000 22030 8802 1000/3000 700/2100
长白Landrace 9000 6000 18530 6906 1000/3000 600/1800
大白Yorkshire 22500 15000 47018 29559 1000/3000 1500/4500

Fig. 1

Principal components analysis plot for data of three breeds"

Fig. 2

The accuracy of breeding value estimation"

Fig. 3

The performance of early-stage prediction in Duroc The figure shows the partial results of early-stage prediction in Duroc. The SSGBLUP were used to estimate the EBVs on the basic of 1000 genotyped pigs in base population and 700 genotyped pigs in test population. The performance evaluation of early-stage depended on the ration whether top 1% excellent individuals were kept or not that have off-test phenotype"

[1] 彭中镇. 《全国生猪遗传改良计划》解读及实施中有关问题的讨论(待续). 猪业科学, 2011, 28(8):100-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673- 5358.2011.08.037.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673- 5358.2011.08.037
PENG Z Z. Discussion on the relevant issues in the interpretation and implementation of the “National Swine Improvement Program”. Swine Industry Science, 2011, 28(8):100-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5358.2011.08.037. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673- 5358.2011.08.037
[2] KNOL E. ASAS-EAAP Exchange Speaker Talk: Is genomic selection beneficial for the pig industry? Journal of Animal Science, 2019, 97l(1):1-7.
[3] CESARANI A, GASPA G, CORREDDU F, CELLESI M, DIMAURO C, MACCIOTTA N P P. Genomic selection of milk fatty acid composition in Sarda dairy sheep: Effect of different phenotypes and relationship matrices on heritability and breeding value accuracy. Journal of Dairy Science, 2019, 102l(4):3189-3203.
[4] MRODE R, OJANGO J M K, OKEYO A M, MWACHARO J M. Genomic selection and use of molecular tools in breeding programs for indigenous and crossbred cattle in developing countries: Current status and future prospects. Frontiers in Genetics, 2018, 9:694. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00694.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00694
[5] 丁向东, 邱小田, 王志刚, 杨红杰, 陈瑶生, 张勤. 全国生猪遗传改良计划(2009—2020)给我国生猪种业带来的变化和未来工作建议. 中国畜牧杂志, 2020(6):169-174.
DING X D, QIU X T, WANG Z G, YANG H J, CHEN Y S, ZHANG Q. The changes and suggestions brought by the National Pig Genetic Improvement Program (2009-2020) for pig breeding industry in China. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2020(6):169-174. (in Chinese)
[6] HAZEL L N, LUSH J L. The efficiency of three methods of selection. Journal of Heredity, 1942, 33l(11):393-399.
[7] HENDERSON. Inverse of a matrix of relationships due to sires and maternal grandsires. Elsevier, 1975, 58l(12):1917-1921.
[8] 尹立林, 马云龙, 项韬, 朱猛进, 余梅, 李新云, 刘小磊, 赵书红. 全基因组选择模型研究进展及展望. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(2):233-242.
YIN L L, MA Y L, XIANG T, ZHU M J, YU M, LI X Y, LIU X L, ZHAO S H. The progress and prospect of genomic selection models. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2019, 50(2):233-242. (in Chinese)
[9] VANRADEN P M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, 91(11):4414-4423. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0980.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0980
[10] FERNANDO R L, GROSSMAN M. Marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction. Genetics Selection Evolution, 1989, 21l(4):467.
[11] GODDARD M E, HAYES B J. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2009, 10(6):381-391. doi: 10.1038/nrg2575.
doi: 10.1038/nrg2575
[12] MEUWISSEN T H E, HAYES B J, GODDARD M E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 2001, 1571(4):1819-1829.
[13] WRAY N R, YANG J, HAYES B J, PRICE A L, GODDARD M E, VISSCHER P M. Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2013, 14(7):507-515. doi: 10.1038/nrg3457.
doi: 10.1038/nrg3457
[14] HICKEY J M, CHIURUGWI T, MACKAY I, POWELL W, HENDRE P. Genomic prediction unifies animal and plant breeding programs to form platforms for biological discovery. Nature Genetics, 2017, 491(9):1297-1303.
[15] HILL W G. Applications of population genetics to animal breeding, from wright, fisher and lush to genomic prediction. Genetics, 2014, 196(1):1-16. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.147850.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.147850
[16] CHRISTENSEN O F, LUND M S. Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2010, 42l(1):2.
[17] AGUILAR I, MISZTAL I, JOHNSON D L, LEGARRA A, TSURUTA S, LAWLOR T J. Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. Journal of Dairy Science, 2010, 931(2):743-752.
[18] GUO X, CHRISTENSEN O F, OSTERSEN T, WANG Y, LUND M S, SU G. Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method. Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 93(2):503-512. doi: 10. 2527/jas.2014-8331.
doi: 10. 2527/jas.2014-8331
[19] 周磊, 杨华威, 赵祖凯, 杨红杰, 刘剑锋. 基因组选择在我国种猪育种中应用的探讨. 中国畜牧杂志, 2018, 54(3):4-8. doi: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.2018-03-004.
doi: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.2018-03-004
ZHOU L, YANG H W, ZHAO Z K, YANG H J, LIU J F. The application of genomic selection in Chinese pig breeding industry. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2018, 54(3):4-8. doi: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.2018-03-004. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.2018-03-004
[20] ANTONIO R, RICHARD C, NABEEL A, ANDREIA A, ALAN A, JONATHAN B, CHRISTIAN B, CAROL C, RICHARD C, PATRICK D, et al. Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology. PLoS ONE, 2009, 4l(8):e6524.
[21] YIN L L, ZHANG H H, TANG Z S, XU J Y, YIN D, ZHANG Z W, YUAN X H, ZHU M J, ZHAO S H, LI X Y, LIU X L. rMVP: A Memory-efficient, Visualization-enhanced, and Parallel-accelerated tool for Genome-Wide Association Study. bioRxiv, 2020, 2020.08. 20.258491.
[22] MISZTAL I, LEGARRA A. Invited review: Efficient computation strategies in genomic selection. Animal, 2017, 11(5):731-736. doi: 10.1017/s1751731116002366.
doi: 10.1017/s1751731116002366
[23] MISZTAL I, AGGREY S E, MUIR W M. Experiences with a single- step genome evaluation. Poultry Science, 2013, 92(9):2530-2534. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02739.
doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02739
[24] Nielsen Bjarne, Ostersen Tage, Guosheng Su, Christensen O, Henryon M. Use Of Genomic SNP Information In Pig Breeding, 2010.
[25] 彭潇, 尹立林, 梅全顺, 王海燕, 刘小磊, 朱猛进, 李新云, 付亮亮, 赵书红. 猪主要经济性状的基因组选择研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(2):439-445. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2019.02.023.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2019.02.023
PENG X, YIN L L, MEI Q S, WANG H Y, LIU X L, ZHU M J, LI X Y, FU L L, ZHAO S H. A study of genome selection based on the porcine major economic traits. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2019, 50(2):439-445. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2019.02.023. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2019.02.023
[26] ZHANG H, YIN L, WANG M, YUAN X, LIU X. Factors affecting the accuracy of genomic selection for agricultural economic traits in maize, cattle, and pig populations. Frontiers in Genetics, 2019, 10:189. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00189.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00189
[27] 张金鑫, 唐韶青, 宋海亮, 高虹, 蒋尧, 江一凡, 弥世荣, 孟庆利, 于凡, 肖炜, 云鹏, 张勤, 丁向东. 北京地区大白猪基因组联合育种研究. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(12):2161-2170. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.013.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.013
ZHANG J X, TANG S Q, SONG H L, GAO H, JIANG Y, JIANG Y F, MI S R, MENG Q L, YU F, XIAO W, YUN P, ZHANG Q, DING X D. Joint genomic selection of Yorkshire in Beijing. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(12):2161-2170. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.013. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.013
[1] TAN XianMing,ZHANG JiaWei,WANG ZhongLin,CHEN JunXu,YANG Feng,YANG WenYu. Prediction of Maize Yield in Relay Strip Intercropping Under Different Water and Nitrogen Conditions Based on PLS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138.
[2] CHEN XueSen, YIN HuaLin, WANG Nan, ZHANG Min, JIANG ShengHui, XU Juan, MAO ZhiQuan, ZHANG ZongYing, WANG ZhiGang, JIANG ZhaoTao, XU YueHua, LI JianMing. Interpretation of the Case of Bud Sports Selection to Promote the High-Quality and Efficient Development of the World’s Apple and Citrus Industry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 755-768.
[3] MingJie XING,XianHong GU,XiaoHong WANG,Yue HAO. Effects of IL-15 Overexpression on Myoblast Differentiation of Porcine Skeletal Muscle Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3652-3663.
[4] YANG ChangPei,WANG NaiXiu,WANG Kai,HUANG ZiQing,LIN HaiLan,ZHANG Li,ZHANG Chen,FENG LuQiu,GAN Ling. Effects and Mechanisms of Exogenous GABA Against Oxidative Stress in Piglets [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3437-3449.
[5] DENG FuLi,SHEN Dan,ZHONG RuQing,ZHANG ShunFen,LI Tao,SUN ShuDong,CHEN Liang,ZHANG HongFu. Non-Starch Polysaccharide Enzymes Cocktail of Corn-Miscellaneous Meal-Based Diet Optimization by In Vitro Method and Its Effects on Intestinal Microbiome in Finishing Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3242-3255.
[6] ZHOU Jun,LIN Qing,SHAO BaoQuan,REN DuanYang,LI JiaQi,ZHANG Zhe,ZHANG Hao. Evaluating the Application Effect of Single-Step Genomic Selection in Pig Populations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 3042-3049.
[7] JIN MengJiao,LIU Bo,WANG KangKang,ZHANG GuangZhong,QIAN WanQiang,WAN FangHao. Light Energy Utilization and Response of Chlorophyll Synthesis Under Different Light Intensities in Mikania micrantha [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2347-2359.
[8] HU RongRong,DING ShiJie,GUO Yun,ZHU HaoZhe,CHEN YiChun,LIU Zheng,DING Xi,TANG ChangBo,ZHOU GuangHong. Effects of Trolox on Proliferation and Differentiation of Pig Muscle Stem Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5290-5301.
[9] ZHU Mo,ZHENG MaiQing,CUI HuanXian,ZHAO GuiPing,LIU Yang. Comparison of Genomic Prediction Accuracy for Meat Type Chicken Carcass Traits Based on GBLUP and BayesB Method [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 5125-5131.
[10] ZHANG DanDan,XU TengTeng,GAO Di,QI Xin,NING Wei,RU ZhenYuan,ZHANG XiangDong,GUO TengLong,SHENTU LuYan,YU Tong,MA YangYang,LI YunSheng,ZHANG YunHai,CAO ZuBing. Transcription Factor TEAD4 Regulates Early Embryonic Development in Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4456-4465.
[11] SHI Jiang,WANG JiaTong,PENG QunHua,LÜ Haipeng,BALDERMANN Susanne,LIN Zhi. Changes in Lipid-Soluble Pigments in Fresh Tea Leaves Treated by Methyl Jasmonate and During Postharvest Oolong Tea Manufacturing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3984-3997.
[12] DU Xing,ZENG Qiang,LIU Lu,LI QiQi,YANG Liu,PAN ZengXiang,LI QiFa. Identification of the Core Promoter of Linc-NORFA and Its Transcriptional Regulation in Erhualian Pig [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3331-3342.
[13] LI Yu,WANG Fang,WENG ZeBin,SONG HaiZhao,SHEN XinChun. Preparation of Soybean Protein-Derived Pro-osteogenic Peptides via Enzymatic Hydrolysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2885-2894.
[14] YU ZhengWang,ZHOU ZhongXin. Functions of Antibacterial and Inducing Defense Peptide Expression of Medium-Chain Fatty Acid and Its Application in Piglet Feeds [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2895-2905.
[15] QIN BenYuan,YANG Yang,ZHANG YanWei,LIU Min,ZHANG WanFeng,WANG HaiZhen,WU YiQi,ZHANG XueLian,CAI ChunBo,GAO PengFei,GUO XiaoHong,LI BuGao,CAO GuoQing. Isolation, Culture, Identification and Biological Characteristics of Pig Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1664-1676.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!