Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (12): 2697-2711.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.12.012

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Molecular Mechanism of IBA-Induced Adventitious Root Formation in Peach Rootstock Cuttings

ZHANG Fan(), WANG ChenBing, REN JiaXuan, LI Yu   

  1. Institute of Fruit and Floriculture Research, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070
  • Received:2026-02-03 Accepted:2026-04-01 Online:2026-06-16 Published:2026-06-16
  • Contact: ZHANG Fan

Abstract:

【Objective】Problems such as difficult rooting are common in the cutting propagation of peach rootstocks. The objective of this study is to explore the formation of adventitious roots (AR) of peach rootstocks induced by exogenous 3-indole butyric acid (IBA), and to clarify the multi-dimensional regulation mechanism of IBA promoting root formation from the perspective of physiological and molecular integration, so as to provide theoretical support and technical reference for efficient asexual breeding of peach rootstocks.【Method】Hardwood cuttings from the peach rootstock ‘GF677’ (a clonal line resistant to replanting) were used as experimental material. Water (CK) served as the control. Cuttings were immersed in IBA solutions at the concentrations of 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, and 1 000 mg·L-1 at the base before being propagated by cuttings. The physiological and biochemical changes during rooting, along with related gene expression characteristics, were analyzed.【Result】300 mg·L-1 IBA was the optimal rooting concentration, achieving a rooting rate of 91%. The indole acetic acid (IAA), cytokinin (CTK) contents and IAA/CTK in ‘GF677’ CT (treated with 300 mg·L-1 IBA) reached the peak at 21 d of rooting stage, and the IAA and CTK contents in ‘GF677’ CK (cuttings with the base soaked in water) were lower than those in ‘GF677’ CT during the whole test period. The total nitrogen (TN) content of ‘GF677’ CT reached the peak at 28 d, and total phosphorus (TP) and total potassium (TK) contents reached the peak at 21-28 d. The peroxidase (POD) activity was highest at 7 d, while the indoleacetic oxidase (IAAO) activity decreased first and then increased at the cutting stage. The soluble sugar content of the two treatments showed a downward trend, and the ‘GF677’ CT was higher than the ‘GF677’ CK after 21 d. During the cutting period, the MDA content in the ‘GF677’ CK group was consistently higher than that in the ‘GF677’ CT group, with two peaks observed (at 7 and 21 d). In the ‘GF677’ CT group, MDA content peaked at 35 d (74.07 g·kg-1). Transcriptome analysis revealed that IBA treatment significantly enriched pathways including plant hormone signaling, nitrogen metabolism, and sugar metabolism. In the hormone pathways, auxin-responsive genes such as Aux/IAA and AUX1, along with cytokinin response factors like B-ARR, exhibited differential expression; key genes in the abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway (e.g., PYR/PYL) were significantly downregulated. In the nitrogen metabolism pathway, nitrogen transporter genes (Nrt) were significantly up-regulated, while nitrate reductase genes (NR) were down-regulated. In the sugar metabolism pathway, hexokinase genes (HK3) showed enhanced expression, while sucrose phosphate synthase genes (SPS1) and starch synthesis-related genes (SS1, GBSS, SBE1) were significantly down-regulated, indicating a shift in carbon metabolism from sucrose and starch synthesis toward breakdown for energy supply.【Conclusion】300 mg·L-1 IBA promotes adventitious root formation in ‘GF677’ by synergistically regulating endogenous hormone homeostasis, driving the redistribution of mineral nutrients and carbon sources toward the basal region of cuttings, and integrating multi-level molecular pathways including hormone signaling, nitrogen assimilation, and glycolysis/catabolism.

Key words: peach rootstock, hardwood cutting, 3-indole butyric acid (IBA), adventitious root, physiology and biochemistry, molecular mechanism

Fig. 1

Effects of hormone concentrations on rooting rate and adventitious root length of replant disease-resistant rootstocks"

Fig. 2

Hormone content dynamics in cuttings during adventitious root formation"

Fig. 3

Nutrient dynamics in cuttings during adventitious root formation"

Fig. 4

Oxidase activity dynamics in cuttings during adventitious root formation"

Fig. 5

Changes in MDA and soluble sugar contents in cuttings during adventitious root formation"

Fig. 6

Correlation analysis of physiological indicators"

Table 1

Sequencing data quality assessment"

分组
Grouping
样本
Sample
测序数据质控后总读长
Clean reads
质控后总碱基数
Clean bases
GC含量
GC content (%)
Q20
(%)
Q30
(%)
G-A0 G-0d-C1 48130898 7189962548 45.58 99.52 97.80
G-0d-C2 45815524 6845394843 45.55 99.52 97.79
G-0d-C3 43127264 6433008530 45.58 99.54 97.93
G-A1 G-7d-C1 44570274 6653185431 45.69 99.54 97.95
G-7d-C2 45239118 6755163127 45.79 99.59 98.13
G-7d-C3 44526412 6653526828 45.74 99.50 97.73
G-B1 G-7d-T1 44462268 6641804574 45.64 99.56 98.03
G-7d-T2 47407368 7073820172 45.55 99.53 97.86
G-7d-T3 43640848 6508022015 45.55 99.55 97.97
G-A2 G-14d-C1 43332016 6457823345 45.61 99.57 98.03
G-14d-C2 49177942 7347009809 45.70 99.56 97.96
G-14d-C3 44863076 6702573052 45.66 99.59 98.14
G-B2 G-14d-T1 45916926 6861470515 45.55 99.65 98.21
G-14d-T2 48791798 7293256377 45.56 99.58 98.06
G-14d-T3 47935658 7163207778 45.60 99.59 98.13
G-A3 G-21d-C1 48129584 7192980193 45.55 99.56 97.98
G-21d-C2 44523382 6650245512 45.55 99.55 97.95
G-21d-C3 43457842 6495042709 45.56 99.54 97.88
G-B3 G-21d-T1 44817512 6700792576 45.61 99.56 97.99
G-21d-T2 46635968 6972283857 45.56 99.52 97.79
G-21d-T3 49185990 7351281479 45.65 99.55 97.95
G-A4 G-28d-C1 47880586 7157271070 45.51 99.54 97.88
G-28d-C2 39522204 5888832483 45.80 99.59 98.11
G-28d-C3 46997642 7021070203 45.47 99.58 98.08
G-B4 G-28d-T1 40929878 6115913412 45.55 99.61 98.16
G-28d-T2 47449228 7084928273 45.59 99.59 98.08
G-28d-T3 42246048 6310988514 45.56 99.61 98.18
G-A5 G-35d-C1 52348502 7813615221 45.80 99.66 98.36
G-35d-C2 49788944 7432809520 45.94 99.68 98.50
G-35d-C3 47084246 7023737201 45.71 99.64 98.35
G-B5 G-35d-T1 43244576 6458406795 45.48 99.54 97.90
G-35d-T2 43516188 6493553276 45.53 99.49 97.70
G-35d-T3 46003980 6869384171 45.59 99.57 98.03

Fig. 7

PCA map of gene expression (a) and heat map of pairwise sample expression correlation (b)"

Fig. 8

Venn diagram (a) and statistical chart of the number (b) of differentially expressed genes A: G-A0_vs_G-B1; B: G-A0_vs_G-B2; C: G-A0_vs_G-B3; D: G-A0_vs_G-B4; E: G-A0_vs_G-B5"

Fig. 9

GO functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes"

Fig. 10

Nitrogen metabolism-related pathways The boxes represent genes. Red indicates up-regulation, green indicates down-regulation, and yellow indicates mixed regulation (where there are both up-regulated and down-regulated members within the same functional group). The same as Fig. 11, Fig. 12"

Fig. 11

Pathways related to sucrose and starch metabolism"

Fig. 12

Effects of hormone treatments on plant hormone signal transduction pathways in peach rootstocks at 21 d post-treatment"

Fig. 13

Hormone regulatory mechanism diagram"

[1]
何平, 李林光, 王海波, 常源升. 基于转录组分析不同着色桃果皮花青苷表达模式与转录因子. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(3): 310-318.
HE P, LI L G, WANG H B, CHANG Y S. Analysis of anthocyanin expression patterns and transcription factors in differently colored peach fruit peel based on transcriptome. Plant Physiology Journal, 2019, 55(3): 310-318. (in Chinese)
[2]
宋海岩, 赵科, 李靖, 郑健萍, 崔晓龙, 李景亚, 陈栋. 桃砧木GF677硬枝扦插繁殖技术的正交优化研究. 西昌学院学报(自然科学版), 2023, 37(4): 1-5.
SONG H Y, ZHAO K, LI J, ZHENG J P, CUI X L, LI J Y, CHEN D. Research of orthogonal optimization of hardwood cutting propagation technology of peach rootstock GF677. Journal of Xichang University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 37(4): 1-5. (in Chinese)
[3]
姜林, 张翠玲, 邵永春, 于福顺, 董军晓, 王博. 国内外桃树育苗技术研究进展. 北方果树, 2011(2): 1-5.
JIANG L, ZHANG C L, SHAO Y C, YU F S, DONG J X, WANG B. Research progress on peach tree seedling technology in China and abroad. Northern Fruits, 2011(2): 1-5. (in Chinese)
[4]
贾志远, 葛晓敏, 唐罗忠. 木本植物扦插繁殖及其影响因素. 世界林业研究, 2015, 28(2): 36-41.
JIA Z Y, GE X M, TANG L Z. Research progress in cutting propagation technology for woody plants and its affecting factors. World Forestry Research, 2015, 28(2): 36-41. (in Chinese)
[5]
REIGHARD G L, LORETI F. Rootstock development// The Peach: Botany, Production and Uses. Wallingford: CABI, 2008: 193-220.
[6]
张帆, 王鸿, 张雪冰, 陈建军. 吲哚丁酸对桃砧木GF677不定根形成过程中生理生化指标的影响. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2023, 38(6): 1025-1031.
ZHANG F, WANG H, ZHANG X B, CHEN J J. Effects of 3-indole butyric acid (IBA) on the physiological and biochemical indexes during adventitious root formation of peach rootstock GF677. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2023, 38(6): 1025-1031. (in Chinese)
[7]
张帆, 王鸿, 陈建军, 张雪冰. 桃无性系砧木不定根形成影响因子研究. 寒旱农业科学, 2023, 2(1): 59-65.
ZHANG F, WANG H, CHEN J J, ZHANG X B. Study on influencing factors of adventitious root formation in peach clonal rootstocks. Journal of Cold-Arid Agricultural Science, 2023, 2(1): 59-65. (in Chinese)
[8]
张帆, 王鸿. 桃绿枝扦插研究进展. 中国果树, 2019(2): 20-25.
ZHANG F, WANG H. Research progress on greenwood cutting of peach. China Fruits, 2019(2): 20-25. (in Chinese)
[9]
王小玲, 高柱, 余发新, 刘腾云, 王碧琴. 观赏羽扇豆离体培养生根关联酶活性及可溶性蛋白含量变化规律研究. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 25(6): 835-839.
WANG X L, GAO Z, YU F X, LIU T Y, WANG B Q. Study on changes of root-related enzyme activities and soluble protein content during in vitro rooting of ornamental lupin. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2010, 25(6): 835-839. (in Chinese)
[10]
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000.
LU R K. Analytical Methods for Soil Agrochemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[11]
卢楠, 孟丙南, 孙宇涵, 李云, 王少明, 郭志民, 王青龙, 徐慧敏. 四倍体刺槐黄化嫩枝扦插生根过程生理生化分析. 东北林业大学学报, 2013, 41(11): 5-9.
LU N, MENG B N, SUN Y H, LI Y, WANG S M, GUO Z M, WANG Q L, XU H M. Physiological and biochemical analysis during rooting of etiolated softwood cuttings in tetraploid Robinia pseudoacacia Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2013, 41(11): 5-9. (in Chinese)
[12]
郭文啸, 孙强, 侯霄帆. 木槿嫩枝扦插生根技术研究. 上海农业科技, 2020(2): 72-74, 111.
GUO W X, SUN Q, HOU X F. Study on rooting technology of Hibiscus syriacus softwood cuttings. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(2): 72-74, 111. (in Chinese)
[13]
张焕欣, 董春娟, 李福凯, 王红飞, 尚庆茂. 植物不定根发生机理的研究进展. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(7): 1457-1464.
ZHANG H X, DONG C J, LI F K, WANG H F, SHANG Q M. Research advances in the mechanism of adventitious root formation in plants. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2017, 37(7): 1457-1464. (in Chinese)
[14]
MURTHY H N, DANDIN V S, PAEK K Y. Tools for biotechnological production of useful phytochemicals from adventitious root cultures. Phytochemistry Reviews, 2016, 15(1): 129-145.

doi: 10.1007/s11101-014-9391-z
[15]
ZHANG Y, GUO J, REN F, JIANG Q, ZHOU X, ZHAO J, LIU X. Integrated physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analyses of the response of peach to nitrogen levels during different growth stages. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(18): 10876.

doi: 10.3390/ijms231810876
[16]
孙雪莲, 杨楚童, 胡亚楠, 邹显花. 植物扦插生根机理的研究进展. 农学学报, 2021, 11(10): 33-40.

doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0016
SUN X L, YANG C T, HU Y N, ZOU X H. Rooting mechanism of plant cuttings: A review. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(10): 33-40. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0016
[17]
王因花, 燕丽萍, 孔雨光, 吴德军, 任飞, 梁静. 绒毛白蜡嫩枝扦插生根的解剖学特征与内源激素变化. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(11): 28-35, 52.
WANG Y H, YAN L P, KONG Y G, WU D J, REN F, LIANG J. Anatomical characteristics and endogenous hormone changes during softwood cutting rooting of Fraxinus velutina. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2023, 43(11): 28-35, 52. (in Chinese)
[18]
李斌. 长柄扁桃嫩枝扦插繁殖技术与生根机理研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2017.
LI B. Research on softwood cutting propagation technology and rooting mechanism of Prunus pedunculata[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2017. (in Chinese)
[19]
LIAO C. Advances on internal influence factors of adventitious rooting of forest trees. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2017, 18(7): 1168-1173.
[20]
CHAPMAN E J, ESTELLE M. Mechanism of auxin-regulated gene expression in plants. Annual Review of Genetics, 2009, 43: 265-285.

doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134148 pmid: 19686081
[21]
GUAN L, LI Y, HUANG K, CHENG Z M. Auxin regulation and MdPIN expression during adventitious root initiation in apple cuttings. Horticulture Research, 2020, 7: 143.

doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00364-3
[22]
FIDLER J, GRASKA J, GIETLER M, NYKIEL M, PRABUCKA B, RYBARCZYK-PŁOŃSKA A, MUSZYŃSKA E, MORKUNAS I, LABUDDA M. PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors play a vital role in the abscisic-acid-dependent responses of plants to external or internal stimuli. Cells, 2022, 11: 1352.

doi: 10.3390/cells11081352
[23]
HWANG I, SHEEN J, MÜLLER B. Cytokinin signaling networks. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2012, 63: 353-380.

doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105503 pmid: 22554243
[24]
GUTIERREZ L, BUSSELL J D, PĂCURAR D I, SCHWAMBACH J, PĂCURAR M, BELLINI C. Phenotypic plasticity of adventitious rooting in Arabidopsis is controlled by complex regulation of auxin response factor transcripts and microRNA abundance. The Plant Cell, 2009, 21(10): 3119-3132.

doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064758
[25]
ZHANG Q, SHI M, TANG F, SU N, JIN F, PAN Y, CHU L, LU M, SHU W, LI J. Transcriptome analysis reveals the hormone signalling coexpression pathways involved in adventitious root formation in Populus. Forests, 2023, 14(7): 1436.

doi: 10.3390/f14071436
[26]
张帆, 王鸿. 桃硬枝扦插生根机理研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(11): 1595-1606.
ZHANG F, WANG H. Research advances in the mechanism of hardwood cutting rooting in peach. Plant Physiology Journal, 2019, 55(11): 1595-1606. (in Chinese)
[27]
宋金耀, 刘永军, 宋刚, 王桂峰, 王贺山. 几个常见树种扦插生根过程中POD、IAAO活性及酚含量的变化. 江苏农业科学, 2007(6): 115-118.
SONG J Y, LIU Y J, SONG G, WANG G F, WANG H S. Changes of POD, IAAO activities and phenolic content in cuttings of several common tree species during rooting. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2007(6): 115-118. (in Chinese)
[28]
翟亚芳, 刘贤德, 吕东, 赵明, 赵祜, 赵兴鹏, 王艺林, 赵玉红. 植物生长调节剂对鞑靼忍冬扦插生根及酶活性变化的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(7): 52-61.
ZHAI Y F, LIU X D, D, ZHAO M, ZHAO H, ZHAO X P, WANG Y L, ZHAO Y H. Effects of plant growth regulators on rooting and enzyme activity changes in cuttings of Lonicera tatarica. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2021, 41(7): 52-61. (in Chinese)
[29]
LI C, HOU X, MOU K, LIU H, ZHAO Z, LIAO W. The involvement of abscisic acid in glucose promoted adventitious root development in cucumber. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022, 295: 110816.

doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110816
[30]
TONG C, LI C, CAO X Y, SUN X D, BAO Q X, MU X R, LIU C Y, LOAKE G J, CHEN H H, MENG L S. Long-distance transport of sucrose in source leaves promotes sink root growth by the EIN3-SUC2 module. PLoS Genetics, 2022, 18(9): e1010424.
[31]
赵加欣, 张静亚, 尚庆茂, 谢露露, 董春娟. 西瓜接穗对嫁接苗根系糖代谢及生长发育的影响. 西北植物学报, 2020, 40(7): 1171-1179.
ZHAO J X, ZHANG J Y, SHANG Q M, XIE L L, DONG C J. Effect of watermelon scion on sugar metabolism and growth in the roots of grafted seedlings. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2020, 40(7): 1171-1179. (in Chinese)
[1] WEI JiaPing, LI ShiChang, REN XiaoFan, ZHAO GuoDong, CUI JunMei, WU ZeFeng, LIU ZiGang, WANG Shuang. Research Progress on the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Plant Responses to Late Spring Coldness [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(9): 1825-1835.
[2] XIE LuLu, LI Fu, ZHANG SiYuan, GAO JianChang. Analysis of Conserved Genes in Adventitious Root Formation Based on Cross Species Transcriptomes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1195-1209.
[3] SUN YanYan, NI AiXin, YANG HanHan, YUAN JingWei, CHEN JiLan. Research Progress on Mechanisms Interpretation and Prediction Methods for Heterosis of Livestock [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(5): 1017-1031.
[4] CAO LiRu, YE FeiYu, KU LiXia, MA ChenChen, PANG YunYun, LIANG XiaoHan, ZHANG Xin, LU XiaoMin. Analysis of Maize Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase (PAL) Family Genes and Functional Study of ZmPAL5 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(12): 2265-2281.
[5] FANG HaoYuan, YANG Liang, WANG HongZhuang, CAO JinCheng, REN WanPing, WEI ShengJuan, YAN PeiShi. Effects of Cross-Ventilation System on Physiology and Production Performance of Beef Cattle in Summer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 1025-1036.
[6] PAN JiaoWen, LI Zhen, WANG QingGuo, GUAN YanAn, LI XiaoBo, DAI ShaoJun, DING GuoHua, LIU Wei. Transcriptomics Analysis of NaCl Response in Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica L.) Seeds at Germination Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 3964-3975.
[7] XIN MingMing, PENG HuiRu, NI ZhongFu, YAO YingYin, SUN QiXin. Progresses in Research of Physiological and Genetic Mechanisms of Wheat Heat Tolerance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(5): 783-791.
[8] LI JiaJia, ZHENG ShuangYu, SUN GenLou, ZHANG WenMing, WANG XiaoBo, QIU LiJuan. Advances and Perspectives in Research of Physiological and Molecular Mechanism of Soybean Response to High Temperature Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(14): 2670-2682.
[9] SUN Yu-yan, LI Xi-xiang. A Review on Molecular Mechanism of the Modified Roots or Stems Development in Vegetables [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(6): 1162-1176.
[10] ZHANG Rui, ZHANG Zong-ying, GAO Li-ping, JI Xiao-hao, MAO Zhi-quan, XU Hai-feng, WANG Nan, WU Shu-jing, CHEN Xue-sen. Study on the Molecular Mechanism Controlling Differences in Fruit Texture Formation of Apple Soft/Crisp Strains [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(18): 3676-3688.
[11] QI Nan-nan, ZHANG Xiao-yan, SU Na-na, WU Qi, GENG Dian-xiang, QI Xue-hui, WEI Sheng-jun, CUI Jin. The Molecular Mechanism of UV-A Induced Anthocyanin Accumulation in the Hypocotyls of Soybean Sprouts [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(12): 2408-2416.
[12] ZHAN Jia-sui;WU E-jiao; LIU Xi-li; CHEN Feng-ping;. Molecular Basis of Resistance of Phytopathogenic Fungi to Several Site-Specific Fungicides [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(17): 3392-3404.
[13] GUO Bao-Jian, SUI Zhi-Peng, LI Yang-Yang, FENG Wan-Jun, YAN Wen-Wen, LI Hui-Min, SUN Qi-Xin, NI Zhong-Fu. Differentially Expressed Protein Profile of Maize Seedling Leaves Between Hybrid and Its Parental Lines [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(14): 3046-3054.
[14] ZHAO Hai-Yan, HUANG Jin-Ling. Study on Microspore Abortion of Male Sterile Cotton Yamian A and Yamian B [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(20): 4130-4140.
[15] WU Cai-E, LI Ting-Ting, FAN Gong-Jian, CHEN Rong, WU Hai-Xia. Effect of Different Preservatives on Post-Harvest Physiological and Storage Quality in Ginkgo biloba Seeds [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(18): 3832-3840.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!