不同产区纽荷尔脐橙橘园果实综合品质评价与适宜区域筛选

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.10.011

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aimed to establish a comprehensive evaluation model in fruit quality, clarify the comprehensive grade of fruit quality and their corresponding meteorological characteristics from different Newhall Navel orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osb. cv. Newhall) orchards in China, so as to provide a reference for the ecological environment adaptability and suitable planting.【Method】Twenty three Newhall orchards in different ecological environments of China were selected to measure fruit external and internal quality indicators. Correlation analysis, principal component analysis and cluster analysis were used to identify the core indicators, and the comprehensive evaluation models of fruit quality were established by analytic hierarchy process (AHP), principal component analysis (PCA) and fuzzy comprehensive appraisal (FCA), respectively. The optimal algorithm model and fruit grade classification threshold were determined and verified with sensory quality evaluation. Meanwhile, the comprehensive quality grades and the characteristics of corresponding ecological factors of Newhall navel orange fruit from different producing areas were explored.【Result】The fruit comprehensive quality of 23 Newhall orchards showed obvious regional characteristics. The fruit in southern Jiangxi and southern Hunan had higher total soluble solid and solid acid ratio, while the fruit in western Hunan and the upper and middle reaches of the Yangtze River had better fruit external color indexes and higher titratable acid. The quality indexes were correlated to varying degrees. Five core indexes were selected by principal component analysis combined with cluster analysis, including comprehensive color index, fruit weight, soluble solids, solid acid ratio, and vitamin C content. At the same time, AHP model was determined as the comprehensive evaluation model of fruit quality with the best fitting degree of sensory quality index: Y (comprehensive value) = 0.06× comprehensive color index + 0.26× single fruit weight +0.16× soluble solid content +0.42× solid acid ratio +0.11× vitamin C content (standardized value). The comprehensive fruit quality indicators of different Newhall orchards were ranked, and the classification threshold was determined as follows: ≥0.60 was the first-class orchards, mainly concentrated in southern Jiangxi, southern Hunan and eastern Guangdong, with active accumulated temperature, effective accumulated temperature, maximum sunshine hours and surface temperature; 0.45-0.60 was the second-class orchards, mainly concentrated in northern Guangxi and western Fujian, characterized by higher temperature accumulation and rainfall; 0.30-0.45 was the third-class orchards, mainly concentrated in western Hunan and the middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River, with relatively lower rainfall and temperature accumulation; <0.30 was the fourth-class orchards, mainly distributed in southern Zhejiang, with the highest rainfall.【Conclusion】The core indicators of the comprehensive quality of citrus fruits were identified by PCA, and the AHP model with the optimal for the Newhall fruit comprehensive evaluation by combining the eigenvalues of each principal component to achieve automatic assignment of AHP judgment matrix. The ecological factors of different grades of orchards were significantly different. These results provided algorithms and data support for the development of the decision system based on "suitable planting" of citrus varieties in different ecological environment.

Key words: Newhall navel orange, fruit quality, comprehensive evaluation, environmental adaptability

CHEN ZhiMin, CHEN XiaoLin, TAN ZhenHua, CHEN ZhaoXing, SHEN DanDan, MA YanYan, ZHENG YongQiang, YI ShiLai, LÜ Qiang, XIE RangJin. Comprehensive Fruit Quality Evaluation and Suitable Areas Selection of Newhall Navel Orange in China[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(10): 1949-1965.

Figures/Tables 13

Table 1

Orchards distribution table"

产区 Area	果园分布 Orchard distribution
产区 Area	编号 Number	地点 Location	简称 Abbreviation	经度 Longitude (°)	纬度 Latitude (°)
浙—闽—粤 Zhejiang-Fujian- Guangdong	1	浙江省台州市临海市 Linhai city, Taizhou city, Zhejiang province	LH	121.29	28.75
	2	福建省三明市尤溪县 Youxi county, Sanming city, Fujian province	YX	118.22	26.33
	3	广东省梅州市平远县 Pingyuan county, Meizhou city, Guangdong province	PY1	115.87	24.8
	4	广东省梅州市平远县 Pingyuan county, Meizhou city, Guangdong province	PY2	115.88	24.56
桂北—赣南—湘南 Northern Guangxi- Southwest Jiangxi- Southwest Hunan	5	广西百色市德保县 Debao county, Baise city, Guangxi	DB	106.58	23.34
	6	广西桂林市恭城瑶族自治县 Gongcheng Yao Autonomous county, Guilin city, Guangxi	GC	110.87	25.07
	7	广西桂林市富川瑶族自治县 Fuchuan Yao Autonomous county, Guilin city, Guangxi	FC	111.29	24.84
	8	江西省赣州市信丰县 Xinfeng county, Ganzhou city, Jiangxi province	XF	114.93	25.39
	9	江西省赣州市上犹县 Shangyou county, Ganzhou city, Jiangxi province	SY	114.57	25.78
	10	江西省赣州市章贡区 Zhanggong district, Ganzhou city, Jiangxi province	ZG	114.94	25.84
	11	湖南省郴州市宜章县 Yizhang county, Chenzhou city, Hunan province	YZ	112.57	25.78
	12	湖南省郴州市桂阳县 Guiyang county, Chenzhou city, Hunan province	GY	112.95	25.47
鄂西—湘西 Western Hubei- Western Hunan	13	湖北省宜昌市枝江市 Zhijiang city, Yichang city, Hubei province	ZJ	111.72	30.5
	14	湖北省宜昌市宜都市 Yidu city, Yichang city, Hubei province	YD	111.45	30.38
	15	湖北省十堰市丹江口市 Danjiangkou city, Shiyan city, Hubei province	DJK	111.47	32.72
	16	湖南省湘西龙山县 Longshan county, Xiangxi, Hunan province	LS	116.29	39.96
	17	湖南省邵阳市新宁县 Xinning county, Shaoyang city, Hunan province	XN	111.02	26.74
	18	湖南省湘西保靖县 Baojing county, Xiangxi, Hunan province	BJ	109.66	28.71
长江中上游 The middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River	19	重庆市云阳县 Yunyang county, Chongqing city	YY	108.85	30.83
	20	重庆市奉节县 Fengjie county, Chongqing city	FJ	109.66	31.08
	21	重庆市北碚区 Beibei district, Chongqing city	BB	106.38	29.77
四川 Sichuan	22	四川省凉山雷波县 Leibo county, Liangshan, Sichuan province	LB	103.58	28.27
云南 Yunnan	23	云南省红河建水县 Jianshui county, Honghe, Yunnan province	JS	102.95	23.66

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fruit external quality of Newhall navel orange in different orchards"

产区 Area	果园 Orchard	综合色泽指数 CCI	纵径 FL (mm)	横径 FW (mm)	单果重 PFW (g)
浙—闽—粤 Zhejiang-Fujian-Guangdong	LH	-45.2±0.2gh	83.8±2.4fg	81.8±3.3def	306.7±41.6 bcd
	YX	-40.5±0.4c	87.5±4.9de	86.6±4.2b	300.0±10.3 cd
	PY1	-36.9±1.6a	86.9±3.2def	77.9±1.3hij	263.3±20.4 fg
	PY2	-43.8±1.6d	86.2±2.0def	77.3±2.1hij	223.3±10.2 fg
	均值 Mean	-41.6±3.7	86.1±1.6	80.9±4.2	273.3±38.4
桂北—赣南—湘南 Northern Guangxi-Southwest Jiangxi-Southwest Hunan	DB	-37.1±0.3a	82.8±0.8h	77.2±0.5ij	236.7±14.6 hi
	GC	-38.8±0.8b	84.5±1.0efg	78.6±1.1ghij	256.7±7.1 fgh
	FC	-35.7±0.1a	91.4±2.3bc	82.2±1.4def	300.0±7.5 cd
	XF	-46.6±0.4fgh	92.4±1.8b	85.6±0.6b	313.3±5.9 bc
	SY	-44.2±0.4de	101.9±2.1a	89.6±0.9a	343.3±11.4 a
	ZG	-45.1±1.6def	84.6±1.8efg	81.0±1.3defg	266.7±17.1 ef
	YZ	-44.3±0.1de	91.3±1.1bc	84.9±0.7bc	326.7±3.8 ab
	GY	-48.5±0.2ij	69.1±0.9k	68.8±0.2l	160.0±0.5 k
	均值 Mean	-42.6±4.7	87.3±9.5	81.0±6.3	275.4±59.1
鄂西—湘西 Western Hubei-Western Hunan	LS	-47.0±2.6gh	77.9±1.2i	79.0±1.2ghij	261.1±17.1 fgh
	XN	-44.5±0.7de	78.1±0.7i	79.6±1.0fghi	250.5±8.4 fgh
	BJ	-45.8±0.2efg	82.3±0.2h	82.3±0.8de	287.5±3.8 de
	ZJ	-48.7±0.1ij	84.4±0.5efg	80.1±0.4efgh	265.8±3.9 ef
	YD	-51.0±1.6k	79.1±0.8i	76.4±0.5j	243.8±2.6 fgh
	DJK	-51.2±0.1k	72.1±1.0j	69.1±0.4l	178.3±5.8 k
	均值 Mean	-48.1±2.7	79.0±4.24	77.8±46.5	248.3±37.6
长江中上游 The middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River	YY	-47.9±0.3hi	72.8±0.2j	73.3±0.8k	209.6±3.6 j
	FJ	-48.7±0.1ij	81.9±0.5gh	77.6±0.2hij	237.7±1.7 ghi
	BB	-50.0±0.5jk	74.2±0.1j	73.6±0.1k	209.6±3.6 j
	均值 Mean	-48.9±1.1	76.3±4.9	74.8±2.4	220.0±17.3
四川 Sichuan	LB	-51.2±0.1k	89.0±0.6cd	82.9±0.7cd	296.1±0.01 cd
云南 Yunnan	JS	-45.1±0.1def	86.9±0.2def	77.0±0.1ij	240.2±0 ghi
整体均值 Overall mean		-41.3±18.8	83.5±7.5	79.2±5.2	260.3±41.6

Table 4

Table 5

Fruit internal quality of Newhall navel orange in different orchards"

产区 Area	果园 Orchard	可溶性固形物 TSS (%)	可滴定酸 TA (‰)	固酸比 TSS/TA	维生素C Vc (mg/100 mL)	出汁率 JR (%)	可食率 ER (%)
浙—闽—粤 Zhejiang-Fujian-Guangdong	LH	10.2±0.2l	6.1±0.6e	17.0±2.1g	42.1±1.9k	57.5±1.3a	74.2±0.5bcde
	YX	12.8±0.2f	6.3±0.6de	20.3±1.8de	58.6±5.5de	57.7±1.0a	71.9±0.5fgh
	PY1	12.0±0.1hi	4.4±0.1hi	27.2±0.8b	52.9±0.7fgh	49.9±0.7hi	70.2±0.9hij
	PY2	12.1±0.1h	4.4±0.1i	27.8±1.0b	65.8±2.1a	51.5±1.4fgh	71.7±1.4fghi
	均值 Mean	11.8±1.1	5.3±1.0	23.1±5.3	54.9±10.0	54.2±4.0	72.1±1.6
桂北—赣南—湘南 Northern Guangxi-Southwest Jiangxi-Southwest Hunan	DB	12.3±0.2gh	6.6±0.1d	18.7±0.7fg	49.3±0.2ij	57.6±1.4a	74.2±2.1bcde
	GC	13.2±0.0e	6.4±0.2de	20.6±0.5de	63.1±2.8ab	53.6±1.9cde	71.9±0.9fgh
	FC	11.4±0.1j	5.3±0.1g	21.5±0.6d	54.0±0.7fg	50.5±0.6ghi	73.3±0.2cdef
	XF	14.4±0.1bc	4.1±0.4i	35.0±1.1a	51.2±0.8ghi	52.3±0.4efg	68.25±0.1kl
	SY	11.6±0.2j	4.6±0.2hi	25.2±0.9c	52.0±0.1ghi	46.7±0.8k	67.6±2.1l
	ZG	14.0±0.2d	4.9±0.0gh	28.5±1.1b	55.5±0.7ef	49.4±1.0ij	67.2±0.7l
	YZ	14.7±0.1ab	6.3±0.1de	23.3±1.9c	61.8±0.3bc	47.9±0.8jk	70.5±0.2ghij
	GY	14.9±0.2a	6.2±0.4de	23.8±0.6c	57.5±1.2de	47.7±0.2jk	69.9±0.8ijk
	均值 Mean	13.3±1.2	5.6±1.0	24.6±5.1	55.2±5.6	50.7±3.6	70.3±2.6
鄂西—湘西 Western Hubei-Western Hunan	LS	12.3±0.4gh	8.4±0.1a	14.7±0.4i	60.1±0.6bcd	58.1±0.7a	77.2±2.3a
	XN	14.2±0.3cd	7.3±0.1c	19.4±0.7ef	59.4±2.7cd	54.2±0.5cde	71.2±1.2ghi
	BJ	13.9±0.0d	8.3±0.4a	16.7±0.8gh	50.8±1.0ghij	55.2±1.0bcd	74.5±0.0bcd
	ZJ	11.1±0.1k	6.3±0.3de	17.6±0.6fg	57.7±0.1de	55.4±1.2bc	72.5±0.2defg
	YD	12.6±0.0fg	7.2±0.3c	17.5±0.7fg	53.7±0.2fg	57.3±0.3a	72.3±1.6efg
	DJK	13.5±0.1e	7.5±0.2bc	18.0±0.7fg	50.9±0.7ghij	58.2±0.9a	75.0±0.6bc
	均值 Mean	12.9±1.0	7.5±0.7	17.3±1.5	55.2±3.8	56.4±1.7	73.8±2.2
长江中上游 The middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River	YY	11.8±0.1ij	7.8±0.1b	15.0±0.0hi	48.0±0.8j	54.8±0.8bcd	75.7±0.0ab
	FJ	11.7±0.1ij	6.4±0.3de	18.5±1.1fg	60.1±0.6bcd	53.3±0.9def	71.9±0.5fgh
	BB	12.4±0.0gh	6.0±0.3ef	21.1±1.2de	58.2±0.8de	56.6±0.9ab	76.0±0.5ab
	均值 Mean	12.0±0.3	6.7±1.0	18.1±2.8	55.1±6.3	54.9±1.6	74.5±2.3
四川 Sichuan	LB	12.2±0.2h	4.3±1.0i	28.0±0.6b	53.2±0.3fgh	53.6±1.0cde	71.1±0.5 ghi
云南 Yunnan	JS	12.8±0.2f	5.4±1.0fg	23.6±0.4c	50.2±1.4hij	51.3±2.1ghi	69.0±0.5 jkl
整体均值 Overall mean		12.7±1.2	6.1±1.2	21.7±5.0	55.1±5.7	53.5±3.6	72.1±2.8

Table 5

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 6

Fig. 3

Table 7

Fig. 4

Table 8

Fig. 5

References 51

[1]	朱攀攀. 不同气候区沃柑果实产量和品质比较研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2020.
	ZHU P P. Comparative study on fruit yield and quality of Wogan in different climate zones[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[2]	LADO J, GAMBETTA G, ZACARIAS L. Key determinants of citrus fruit quality: Metabolites and main changes during maturation. Scientia Horticulturae, 2018, 233: 238-248. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.055
[3]	李玉华, 褚希, 荣云鹏, 张红. 乡村振兴战略下智慧气象为农服务体系研究. 农业工程, 2021, 11(8): 59-63.
	LI Y H, CHU X, RONG Y P, ZHANG H. Smart weather service system for agriculture under rural revitalization strategy. Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 11(8): 59-63. (in Chinese)
[4]	李勋兰, 洪林, 杨蕾, 王武, 韩国辉, 农江飞, 谭平. 11个柑橘品种果实营养成分分析与品质综合评价. 食品科学, 2020, 41(8): 228-233. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190526-307
	LI X L, HONG L, YANG L, WANG W, HAN G H, NONG J F, TAN P. Analysis of nutritional components and comprehensive quality evaluation of Citrus fruit from eleven varieties. Food Science, 2020, 41(8): 228-233. (in Chinese)
[5]	曲学燕, 杜欢欢, 蒋景龙, 江海, 刘源炜, 王洪艳. 汉中主要推广种植柑橘综合品质的分析评价. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(17): 4284-4287.
	QU X Y, DU H H, JIANG J L, JIANG H, LIU Y W, WANG H Y. Analysis and evaluation of the main cultivated Citrus comprehensive quality in Hanzhong. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 54(17): 4284-4287. (in Chinese)
[6]	唐帅, 易自力, 李娜, 谢一顾, 邓子牛, 李大志. 冰糖橙果实品质综合评价量化模型的建立及应用. 果树学报, 2018, 35(7): 889-897.
	TANG S, YI Z L, LI N, XIE Y G, DENG Z N, LI D Z. A quantitative model for the comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of the Bingtang sweet orange. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(7): 889-897. (in Chinese)
[7]	张印平, 邹丽霞, 郭昌东, 唐广田. 柑桔物候期与气象因子关系的分析. 气象研究与应用, 2017, 38(3): 93-95.
	ZHANG Y P, ZOU L X, GUO C D, TANG G T. Analysis of relationship between citrus phenological phase and meteorological factors. Journal of Meteorological Research and Application, 2017, 38(3): 93-95. (in Chinese)
[8]	张印平, 郭昌东. 桂林市气候变暖特征及其对柑桔物候期的影响. 气象科技, 2017, 45(1): 203-208.
	ZHANG Y P, GUO C D. Characteristics of climate warming in Guilin and its impact on phenological phases of local Citrus. Meteorological Science and Technology, 2017, 45(1): 203-208. (in Chinese)
[9]	陈凯, 章文才. 气象条件对柑桔树生长和结果的影响. 气象科学, 1991, 11(4): 431-436.
	CHEN K, ZHANG W C. Effects of meteorological condition on growth and fruit bearing of citrus tree. Scientia Meteorologica Sinica, 1991, 11(4): 431-436. (in Chinese)
[10]	谢远玉, 赖晓桦, 朱凌金, 赖华荣, 严翔. 气象条件对柑桔果实膨大速度的影响. 中国农业气象, 2007, 28(4): 406-408.
	XIE Y Y, LAI X H, ZHU L J, LAI H R, YAN X. Influence of meteorological conditions on fruit inflation velocity of orange. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2007, 28(4): 406-408. (in Chinese)
[11]	高阳华, 贾捷, 王跃飞, 易新民, 陈天战. 气象条件对柑桔果实生长的影响. 中国柑桔, 1995, 24(2): 17-19.
	GAO Y H, JIA J, WANG Y F, YI X M, CHEN T Z. Effect of meteorological condition on the fruit devdopmentof Citrus. South China Fruits, 1995, 24(2): 17-19. (in Chinese)
[12]	张成学, 高阳华, 易新民, 陶礼应, 贾捷, 姜淑芳. 海拔高度及气象条件对柑桔果实品质的影响. 中国柑桔, 1995, 24(2): 20-22.
	ZHANG C X, GAO Y H, YI X M, TAO L Y, JIA J, JIANG S F. Effect of altitude and meteorological condition on the fruit quality of Citrus. South China Fruits, 1995, 24(2): 20-22. (in Chinese)
[13]	彭良志, 王成秋, 何绍兰, 淳长品, 晏承泉. 海拔高度和气象因子对脐橙果实品质的影响. 中国南方果树, 2000, 29(4): 3-4.
	PENG L Z, WANG C Q, HE S L, CHUN C P, YAN C Q. The effects of height above sea level and main meteorological factors on navel orange fruit quality. South China Fruits, 2000, 29(4): 3-4. (in Chinese)
[14]	龙余良, 金勇根, 邓德文, 吴凡, 谢远玉. 赣南脐橙气候品质标准研究. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(7): 116-123. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17030015
	LONG Y L, JIN Y G, DENG D W, WU F, XIE Y Y. Climatic quality standard of navel orange in southern Jiangxi. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(7): 116-123. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17030015
[15]	柏建, 吕杰. 四川盆地夏橙立体气候适应性区划. 四川气象, 2005, 25(4): 21-22, 27.
	BAI J, LÜ J. Compartment of stereo-climate adaptability of Summer Orange in Sichuan Basin. Journal of Sichuan Meteorology, 2005, 25(4): 21-22, 27. (in Chinese)
[16]	林正雨, 陈强, 邓良基, 李晓, 何鹏, 熊鹰. 四川柑橘适宜分布及其对气候变化的响应研究. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(6): 845-859.
	LIN Z Y, CHEN Q, DENG L J, LI X, HE P, XIONG Y. Response of suitable distribution of citrus in Sichuan Province to climate change. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(6): 845-859. (in Chinese)
[17]	鲍江峰. 纽荷尔脐橙和湖北省主要柑橘品种果实品质的研究与区划[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2005.
	BAO J F. Study and division of fruit quality of Newhall navel orange and main citrus varieties in Hubei Province[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese)
[18]	董琼, 李世民, 高尚杰, 李玉新, 段华超, 郑鑫华, 姚先富, 字强. 不同种源树番茄果实品质比较及综合分析. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(4): 266-273.
	DONG Q, LI S M, GAO S J, LI Y X, DUAN H C, ZHENG X H, YAO X F, ZI Q. Comparison and comprehensive analysis the quality of Cyphomandra betacea from different provenance. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(4): 266-273. (in Chinese)
[19]	郭紫晶, 李娜, 张雅, 张阳, 李大志. 纽荷尔脐橙果实品质评价系统的建立与应用. 中国果树, 2022(6): 31-38.
	GUO Z J, LI N, ZHANG Y, ZHANG Y, LI D Z. Establishment and verification of ‘Newhall’ navel orange fruit quality evaluation system. China Fruits, 2022(6): 31-38. (in Chinese)
[20]	刘遵春, 包东娥, 廖明安. 层次分析法在金花梨果实品质评价上的应用. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(8): 125-128.
	LIU Z C, BAO D E, LIAO M A. Application of analytic hierarchy process in evaluating Jinhua pear quality. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 34(8): 125-128. (in Chinese)
[21]	李小婷, 徐世荣, 潘东明, 张智伟. 7种柚子果实品质分析与模糊综合评判. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(27): 78-80, 176.
	LI X T, XU S R, PAN D M, ZHANG Z W. Analysis of fruit quality and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of seven cultivars of pomelos. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(27): 78-80, 176. (in Chinese)
[22]	王贺元. 大数据时代的数学建模. 沈阳师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(1): 55-59.
	WANG H Y. Mathematical modeling in big data era. Journal of Shenyang Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 38(1): 55-59. (in Chinese)
[23]	GB/T 8210—2011. 柑橘鲜果检验方法. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.
	GB/T 8210—2011. Methods for the inspection of citrus fresh fruit. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[24]	GILI B, ZIPORA T, RON P. Effects of rootstock/scion combinations on the flavor of citrus fruit. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2013, 61(47): 11286-11294. doi: 10.1021/jf402892p pmid: 24219601
[25]	毛娟, 万鹏, 梁国平, 马丽娟, 陈佰鸿. 基于区域适栽品种筛选的苹果品质综合评价模型的建立. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(19): 60-66, 77.
	MAO J, WAN P, LIANG G P, MA L J, CHEN B H. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation model of apple quality for regional suitable varieties selection. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(19): 60-66, 77. (in Chinese)
[26]	刘文欢. 基于养分平衡的柑橘高产优质叶片矿质营养诊断与施肥决策研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2021.
	LIU W H. Study on mineral nutrition diagnosis and fertilization decision of citrus leaves with high yield and high quality based on nutrient balance[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[27]	韩中庚. 数学建模方法及其应用. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2005.
	HAN Z G. Methods and Applications of Mathematical Modeling. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2005. (in Chinese)
[28]	姜启源, 谢金星, 叶俊. 数学模型. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003.
	JIANG Q Y, XIE J X, YE J. Mathematical Model. 3rd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003. (in Chinese)
[29]	万春雁, 糜林, 郭达, 乔玉山, 霍恒志, 陈丙义, 李金凤, 陈雪平. 基于果实品质模糊综合评判的砂梨熟期配套品种初步筛选. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(9): 99-107.
	WAN C Y, MI L, GUO D, QIAO Y S, HUO H Z, CHEN B Y, LI J F, CHEN X P. Preliminary screening of Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai combination with different mature periods based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation of fruit quality. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(9): 99-107. (in Chinese)
[30]	PAN Y T, WANG W Q, SHI W. Assessment of CPC global daily surface air temperature (CPC-T2m) analysis. Science and Technology Infusion Climate Bulletin, 2019, 10: 22-24.
[31]	黄娟. 库尔勒香梨气候品质评价指标及模型的研究[D]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2017.
	HUANG J. Study on evaluation index and model of climate quality of Korla fragrant pear[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 2017. (in Chinese)
[32]	MANERA J, BROTONS J M, CONESA A, PORRAS I. Relationship between air temperature and degreening of lemon (Citrus lemon L. Burm. F.) peel color during maturation. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2012, 6(6): 1051-1058.
[33]	伊华林, 刘慧宇. 我国柑橘品种分布特点及适地适栽品种选择探讨. 中国果树, 2022(1): 1-7.
	YI H L, LIU H Y. Distribution characteristics of citrus varieties and selection of varieties suitable for planting in China. China Fruits, 2022(1): 1-7. (in Chinese)
[34]	荆佳伊, 刘晓佳, 邓丽莉, 姚世响, 曾凯芳. 采收成熟度对晚熟W.默科特柑橘贮藏期品质的影响. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(5): 303-309.
	JING J Y, LIU X J, DENG L L, YAO S X, ZENG K F. Effects of harvesting maturity on the quality changes during storage of late maturing W.Murcott. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(5): 303-309. (in Chinese)
[35]	高甜甜, 史婷, 李高阳, 何双, 尚雪波, 戴润平, 张菊华, 刘伟. 湖南主栽柑橘类品种制汁适宜性评价. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(20): 112-121.
	GAO T T, SHI T, LI G Y, HE S, SHANG X B, DAI R P, ZHANG J H, LIU W. Suitability evaluation of main citrus varieties for juice processing in Hunan Province. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(20): 112-121. (in Chinese)
[36]	毛峰, 魏阳吉, 唐飞, 王鹤妍. 柑橘感官品质评价系统和评价方法: CN109816216A. 2019-05-28.
	MAO F, WEI Y J, TANG F, WANG H Y. A citrus sensory quality evaluation system and method: CN109816216A. 2019-05-28. (in Chinese)
[37]	张洪青, 赵艳丽. 多指标常用综合评价方法比较研究. 现代商贸工业, 2014, 26(7): 20.
	ZHANG H Q, ZHAO Y L. Comparative study on common comprehensive evaluation methods of multi-index. Modern Business Trade Industry, 2014, 26(7): 20. (in Chinese)
[38]	刘英才, 刘山水, 邓建和. 气候要素对温州蜜柑果实品质影响的相关研究. 中国农业气象, 1998, 19(2): 29-31.
	LIU Y C, LIU S S, DENG J H. Study on the influence of climatic factors on the quality of Wenzhou mandarin fruit. Agricultural Meteorology, 1998, 19(2): 29-31. (in Chinese)
[39]	李金强, 李文云, 柏自琴, 方明忠. 贵州山地气象因子与柑橘果实品质的相关性研究. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(5): 2009-2012.
	LI J Q, LI W Y, BAI Z Q, FANG M Z. Study on relationship between meteorological factors and quality of Citrus fruit in Guizhou mountainous areas. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 26(5): 2009-2012. (in Chinese)
[40]	李程. 平远县举办第17届脐橙文化旅游节. 源流, 2022(1): 33.
	LI C. Pingyuan County held the 17th Navel Orange Cultural Tourism Festival. headstream, 2022(1): 33. (in Chinese)
[41]	林苑菲. 广东省平远县脐橙产业发展研究[D]. 广州: 仲恺农业工程学院, 2016.
	LIN Y F. Study on the development of navel orange industry in Pingyuan county, Guangdong province[D]. Guangzhou: Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, 2016. (in Chinese)
[42]	HUSSAIN S B, ANJUM M A, HUSSAIN S, EJAZ S, KAMRAN H M. Agro-climatic conditions affect fruit quality of mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) cultivars. Fruits, 2017, 72(6): 341-349. doi: 10.17660/th2017/72.6.2
[43]	NAWAZ R, ABBASI N A, HAFIZ I A, KHALID A. Impact of varying agrometeorological indices on peel color and composition of Kinnow fruit (Citrus nobilis Lour x Citrus deliciosa Tenora) grown at different ecological zones. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2020, 100(6): 2688-2704. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.v100.6
[44]	陈秋夏, 郑小玲, 王正加. 浙江省主栽脐橙的品质和RAPD分析. 中国南方果树, 2020, 49(5): 41-44.
	CHEN Q X, ZHENG X L, WANG Z J. Quality and RAPD analysis of navel orange in Zhejiang province. South China Fruits, 2020, 49(5): 41-44. (in Chinese)
[45]	NAWAZ R, ABBASI N A, HAFIZ I A, KHALID A. Impact of climate variables on growth and development of Kinnow fruit (Citrus nobilis Lour x Citrus deliciosa Tenora) grown at different ecological zones under climate change scenario. Scientia Horticulturae, 2020, 260: 108868. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108868
[46]	倪超, 顾海敏, 何永坤, 阮光伦. 涪陵区关键气候因子变化对柑橘产量的影响. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(8): 29-33.
	NI C, GU H M, HE Y K, RUAN G L. Study on effects of key meteorological factors on yield of Citrus in Fuling district. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2017, 29(8): 29-33. (in Chinese)
[47]	杨辉, 侯显达, 王铄今, 刘书田, 贾书刚, 杜潇, 侯彦林. 柑橘产量大小年年型等级与气象条件关系研究. 吉林农业大学学报. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1100.S.20220711.1703.003.html.
	YANG H, HOU X D, WANG S J, LIU S T, JIA S G, DU X, HOU Y L. Study on the Relationship between the Grade of Citrus Yield and the Meteorological Conditions in Pingle County. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1100.S. 20220711.1703.003.html. in Chinese)
[48]	凌丽俐, 彭良志, 淳长品, 江才伦, 曹立, 雷霆. 赣南不同产量纽荷尔脐橙园叶片养分状况分析. 中国南方果树, 2010, 39(5): 30-32.
	LING L L, PENG L Z, CHUN C P, JIANG C L, CAO L, LEI T. Analysis of nutrient status of leaves in newhall navel orange orchard with different yield in southern Jiangxi. South China Fruits, 2010, 39(5): 30-32. (in Chinese)
[49]	孙系巍, 汤丹, 李峰, 龙桂友, 邓子牛, 李娜. 主要气象因子对冰糖橙果实品质的影响. 湖南农业科学, 2015(5): 77-80.
	SUN X W, TANG D, LI F, LONG G Y, DENG Z N, LI N. Effects of main meteorological factors on fruit quality of Bingtang sweet orange. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2015(5): 77-80. (in Chinese)
[50]	RODRIGO M J, ALQUÉZAR B, ALÓS E, LADO J, ZACARÍAS L. Biochemical bases and molecular regulation of pigmentation in the peel of Citrus fruit. Scientia Horticulturae, 2013, 163: 46-62. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.08.014
[51]	周贝贝, 张强, 孙健, 李兴亮, 魏钦平. 偏最小二乘回归在苹果土壤养分与果实品质关系的研究与应用. 果树学报, 2016, 33(1): 106-112.
	ZHOU B B, ZHANG Q, SUN J, LI X L, WEI Q P. Study and application of partial least squares regression on relationship between soil nutrient and fruit quality. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016, 33(1): 106-112. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

	果形大小 Fruit size	果面 Fruit noodles	口感 Taste	化渣性 Slag
一等（4—5分） First class (4-5)	果形端正整齐，大小均匀，横径75—85 mm The shape of the fruit is neat and even, with a transverse diameter of 75-85 mm	果面洁净果皮光滑，色泽偏红，着色均匀，无明显斑点或缺陷 The fruit surface is clean and the skin is smooth, with a reddish color and even coloring, without obvious spots or defects	甜 Sweet	肉质细嫩，化渣性极好 The meat is delicate, excellent slagging properties
二等（3—4分） Second class (3-4)	果形较端正整齐，大小较均匀，横径70— 75 mm或者85—90 mm The fruit shape is relatively upright and neat, with a uniform size and a transverse diameter of 70-75 or 85-90 mm	果面较洁净光滑，色泽偏黄，允许由一到两个小斑点或缺陷 The fruit surface is relatively clean and smooth, with a yellowish color, allowing for one to two small spots or defects	酸甜 Sour and sweet	肉质较细嫩，化渣性较好 The meat is tender, good slagging properties
三等（2—3分） Third class (2-3)	无明显畸形果，但整体表现较差 No obvious abnormal fruit, but overall poor performance	无明显大斑点或缺陷，但整体表现较差 No obvious large spots or defects, but overall poor performance	酸 Sour	整体感觉表现较差 Overall poor performance

等级 Class	得分 Score
一等品 First class	≥8
二等品 Second class	7.5-8
三等品 Third class	7-7.5
四等品 Fourth class	<7

指标 Index	主成分Principal component
指标 Index	1	2	3	4	5
CCI	-0.11	0.11	-0.06	0.97*	0.03
FW	-0.48	0.81*	-0.16	0.16	-0.03
FL	-0.18	0.97*	-0.01	0.05	-0.01
PFW	-0.12	0.96*	-0.03	0.03	-0.14
TSS	-0.17	-0.11	0.94*	-0.07	0.13
TA	0.91*	-0.19	0.29	-0.08	-0.01
TSS/TA	-0.90*	0.15	0.12	-0.02	0.03
Vc	-0.09	-0.12	0.12	0.03	0.97*
JR	0.76*	-0.13	-0.25	-0.19	-0.14
ER	0.83*	-0.29	-0.29	-0.03	-0.01
特征值 Eigenvalue	3.29	2.75	1.19	1.03	1.02
累计方差贡献 Cumulative variance contribution	32.95	60.54	72.48	82.87	93.09
代表指标 Representative index	TSS/TA	PFW	TSS	CCI	Vc

	CCI	TSS	TSS/TA	Vc	PFW	特征向量 Eigenvector	权重 Weight
CCI	1.00	0.33	0.20	0.50	0.25	0.11	0.06
TSS	3.00	1.00	0.33	2.00	0.50	0.30	0.16
TSS/TA	5.00	3.00	1.00	4.00	2.00	0.78	0.42
Vc	2.00	0.50	0.25	1.00	0.33	0.18	0.10
PFW	4.00	2.00	0.50	3.00	1.00	0.49	0.26

果园 Orchard	年份 Year
果园 Orchard	2019—2020		2021
ZG	0.74	一等 First class	0.68	一等 First class
LB	0.67	一等 First class	0.77	一等 First class
PY	0.61	一等 First class	0.58	二等 Second class
GC	0.53	二等 Second class	0.52	二等 Second class
SY	0.46	二等 Second class	0.49	二等 Second class
DJK	0.31	三等 Third class	0.40	三等 Third class
YY	0.24	四等 Fourth class	0.17	四等 Fourth class

Comprehensive Fruit Quality Evaluation and Suitable Areas Selection of Newhall Navel Orange in China

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 51

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	CUI JieHao, ZHANG Meng, WANG Qin, YU JiaYan, LIN Kun, LI ShangZe, LAN Heng, GENG YanQiu, ZHANG Qiang, GUO LiYing, SHAO XiWen. Evaluation of Lodging Resistance and Its Physiological Mechanisms in Japonica Rice Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1420-1438.
[2]	ZHANG LiDong, GUO YiCong, HUANG HongYu, NIE Jing, WANG Bing, LI MengYu, LI JiaWang, SUI XiaoLei, LI YuHe. Correlation Analysis of Cucumber Fruit Quality Integrating Sensory Evaluation with Nutritional Traits and Flavor Compound Characteristics [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1087-1100.
[3]	HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[4]	ZHANG YaFeng, DONG WeiJin, LI QiYun, LU Yang, ZHANG ZhengKun, SUI Li. Effect of Interaction Between Beauveria bassiana and Potassium on Tomato Fruit Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1131-1144.
[5]	CHU TianShuo, CHEN XiaoAn, ZHU JinJin, WANG Ce, LOU Wei. Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Growth, Yield and Quality of Gannan Navel Orange During Critical Fertility Period [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5247-5258.
[6]	CHEN TianXiao, CAO Rong, SONG QianNan, HU LiangLiang, WANG SuHua, WANG LiXia, CHENG XuZhen, CHEN HongLin. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance at the Seedling Stage and Screening of Tolerant Germplasm in Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4317-4332.
[7]	TANG GuiMei, LI WeiDong, ZHOU YuXia, KONG YouHan, XIAO XiaoLing, PENG YingShu, ZHANG Li, FU HongYan, LIU Yang, HUANG GuoLin. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Cymbidium faberi Germplasm Resources Based on Phenotypic Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 339-354.
[8]	WANG Di, HAN ShouAn, ZHANG Wen, WANG Min, SHI HuiDong, ZHU XueHui, BAI ShiJian, LIU XuPeng, TIAN Jia, XIE Hui. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Fruit and Raisin Quality of Thompson Seedless Grapes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(18): 3767-3782.
[9]	ZHAO TianTian, YUAN JianLong, ZHUO FengQi, TANG ZhenSan, XU Jie, ZHANG Feng. Comprehensive Evaluation of Potato Flour Quality and Variety Screening [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(13): 2522-2537.
[10]	DONG Jie, ZHANG Peng, LI WangZe, LI HeFang, ZHOU GuoChao, CHEN KeQin, FANG YuLin, ZHANG KeKun. Effects of Seedlessness and Swelling Treatments Based on GA₃ and CPPU on the Fruit Quality of 'Shine Muscat' Grapes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(10): 2008-2021.
[11]	LI PeiSong, LU YongDi, GUO Yu, ZHANG QiPeng, LIU TaoFen, WANG TianHe, YANG MingFeng, XIANG Dao, TIAN JingShan, ZHANG WangFeng. The Regional Distribution of Raw Cotton Quality in Xinjiang Based on Notarized Inspection Data for Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(1): 58-74.
[12]	QIAO ZhengYan, YU Miao, TANG YuJie, SHI GuiShan, LIU XinYu, LIU XiaoHan, WANG XinDing, LI Yang, WANG Nai, CHEN BingRu. Comprehensive Evaluation for Soda Salinity and Alkalinity in Sorghum Seedling Stage and Selection of Indicators [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(1): 30-42.
[13]	GUO Lei, HUANG ChenYan, SONG HongFeng, SHEN ZhiJun, ZHANG BinBin, MA RuiJuan, SUN Meng, HE Xin, YU MingLiang. Screening, Compounding and Safety Evaluation of Herbicides Suitable for Peach Nursery [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1734-1747.
[14]	WU YuZhen, HUANG LongYu, ZHOU DaYun, HUANG YiWen, FU ShouYang, PENG Jun, KUANG Meng. Construction of SSR Fingerprint Library and Comprehensive Evaluation for Approved Cotton Varieties in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(8): 1430-1443.
[15]	PAN Jing, MENG ZhiHao, WANG Sen, WANG HaiBo, HE Ping, CHANG YuanSheng, ZHENG WenYan, LI LinGuang, WANG Chen, WANG Ping, HE XiaoWen. Diversity Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Quality Traits in Reciprocal Cross Progenies of Apple Golden Delicious and Fuji Nagafu No.2 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(24): 4945-4963.