Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (12): 2487-2498.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.12.001

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Gene Mapping and Candidate Gene Analysis of Grain Width Mutant gw87 in Rice

ZHANG XiangYu(),GUO Jia,WANG San,CHEN CongPing,SUN ChangHui,DENG XiaoJian,WANG PingRong()   

  1. Rice Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130
  • Received:2020-11-18 Accepted:2021-01-15 Online:2021-06-16 Published:2021-06-24
  • Contact: PingRong WANG E-mail:964670742@qq.com;prwang@sicau.edu.cn

Abstract:

【Objective】Phenotypic identification, genetic analysis, gene mapping and candidate gene analysis of grain width mutant gw87 (grain width87) were performed in rice, so as to lay a good foundation for further understanding molecular mechanism and utilization potentiality of this gene regulating rice grain size.【Method】Through ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis, we isolated gw87 mutant showing significant increase of grain width and 1000-grain weight from indica restorer line material 676R. To identify phenotypic and physiological characteristics of the mutant, we performed observation of phenotypes, investigation of agronomic traits, sensitivity analysis of exogenous brassinolide (BL), determination of chlorophyll contents and photosynthetic parameters by using gw87 and its wild type. To analyze its genetic behavior, we investigated F1 phenotypes and F2 segregation of the crossing combination between gw87 and its wild-type parent 676R. To find candidate gene of gw87, we conducted high-throughput sequencing and MutMap analysis of 30 mutant plants from the F2 population of gw87×676R, and molecular mapping using the F2 population crossing gw87 and japonica cultivar Nipponbare. Meanwhile, we confirmed the candidate gene by sequencing its DNA and cDNA sequences. In addition, we detected expression levels of brassinolide synthesis pathway genes OsDWARF4, D11 and D2 using qRT-PCR analysis.【Result】Compared with the wild-type parent 676R, the gw87 mutant showed significant reduction of productive panicle number per plant, main panicle length and seed setting rate, but significant increase of grain width and 1000-grain weight. Meanwhile, the mutant displayed decreased plant height and shortened internodes, in which the first internode was distorted and its length is shortened the most. Besides, leaf length of gw87 was decreased but the width was increased. Sensitivity assays of exogenous BL suggested that the sensitivity of gw87 seedlings to exogenous BL was reduced. Determination of photosynthetic pigments and photosynthetic parameters showed that chlorophyll content and net photosynthetic rate were decreased. Genetic analysis revealed that the mutant phenotype of gw87 was governed by a single recessive nuclear gene. High-throughput sequencing and MutMap analysis suggested that the gw87 locus was located in the middle of chromosome 5, and only one base mutation causing amino acid change of the encoded protein occurred in this chromosome region. Molecular marker linkage analysis demonstrated that the gw87 gene was mapped to a 101 kb genomic region between InDel markers X2 and X3. The MutMap and molecular mapping revealed that the candidate gene was LOC_Os05g32270 that encodes a transcription factor containing the AP2/EREBP DNA-binding domain. Subsequently, we confirmed the candidate gene by sequencing its DNA and cDNA. In the gw87 mutant, a single nucleotide G-to-A substitution occurred at position 1041 in its DNA sequence, and the 76-bp intron sequence adjacent to this mutated nucleotide was spliced into exon in its cDNA, which caused shift of the reading frame and then premature termination of the protein translation. In addition, qRT-PCR analysis showed that the expression of BR synthetic genes were significantly up-regulated in gw87, indicating that BR signal was weakened in the mutant.【Conclusion】gw87 is a new allelic mutant of smos1, shb, rla1, and ngr5. However, unlike these mutants, gw87 exhibited significant increase of grain width and 1000-grain weight relative to its wild type. The reason for the differentiation could be that different mutation sites in the LOC_Os05g32270 gene, resulting in different functional activities of the encoded protein.

Key words: rice (Oryza sativa L.), grain, 1000-grain weight, brassinosteroid, AP2-type transcription factor

Table 1

The primers for qRT-PCR"

基因 Gene 正向引物 Forward primers (5′-3′) 反向引物 Reverse primers (5′-3′)
OsDWARF4 TCGTCGGCGAGACGTTCG GGTAGCTGCACTCGAACA
D11 TTGGTGAGACGCTGAGGT CACAGGACACTATGGTGGG
D2 GGAATTTATTGTCGGCCTCA CTCGCCATCTTCTTCTTGG
Actin1 CCCCCATGCTATCCTTCGT GGCCGTTGTGGTGAATGACT

Fig. 1

Plant phenotypes of gw87 mutant and its wild type (WT) A, B and D: Plants at seedling stage, tillering stage and grain-filling stage, respectively; C: Leaf angle at grain-filling stage. Bar=5 cm"

Table 2

Comparison of major agronomic traits between gw87 and its wild-type parent 676R"

性状Trait 676R (WT) gw87 比WT增减 Compared with CK (%)
株高 Plant height (cm) 118.0±1.9 80.2±1.7 -32.0**
单株有效穗 No. of productive panicles per plant 5.8±0.4 4.9±0.2 -15.5*
主穗穗长 Length of main panicle (cm) 27.5±1.0 18.6±1.2 -32.4**
主穗一次枝梗数 No. of primary branches per main panicle 14.8±0.5 16.7±1.0 12.8*
主穗二次枝梗数 No. of secondary branches per main panicle 42.5±1.1 30.5±1.0 -28.2**
主穗着粒数 Total No. of grains per main panicle 214.6±2.5 216.8±5.1 1.0
结实率Seed setting rate (%) 83.9±0.4 67.3±2.0 -16.6**
千粒重1000-grain weight (g) 37.4±0.2 41.9±0.2 12.0**

Fig. 2

Panicles, stems and grains of gw87 mutant and its wild type (WT) A: Panicles and internodes of WT (left) and gw87 (right) (P indicates panicle, Ⅰ-Ⅵ indicate the first to the sixth internodes from the top), Bar=5 cm; B: Length of panicles and internode; C and D: Grains of WT and gw87, Bar=1 cm; E and F: Length and width of grains, respectively; * and ** indicate significant difference at P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively. The same as below"

Fig. 3

Leaf comparison of gw87 mutant and its wild type (WT) A, B and C: Morphology, length and width of the third fully expanding leaf at seeding stage; D, E and F: Morphology, length and width of the flag leaf at heading stage. Bar=3 cm"

Fig. 4

Responses of gw87 mutant and its wild type (WT) to exogenous BL A, B and G: Change of root length under presence or absence of 0.001 μmol·L-1 exogenous BL in the dark; C, D and H: Change of coleoptile length under presence or absence of 1 μmol·L-1 exogenous BL under light; E, F and I: Change of leaf angle under different concentrations of exogenous BL. Bar=1 cm"

Table 3

Pigment contents in leaves of the gw87 mutant and wild-type 676R"

材料 Material 叶绿素a Chl a 叶绿素b Chl b 总叶绿素 Total Chl Chla/Chlb 类胡萝卜素 Caro
676R(WT) 2.18±0.15 0.49±0.04 2.67±0.19 4.38±0.05 0.46±0.04
gw87 2.54±0.15 0.61±0.05 3.16±0.19 4.18±0.12 0.51±0.03
与WT相比Compared to WT (%) 16.5* 24.5* 18.4* -4.6 10.9

Table 4

Determination of leaf photosynthetic parameters of the gw87 mutant and wild-type 676R"

材料
Material
净光合速率Pn
Net photosynthetic rate (μmol·m-2.s-1)
蒸腾速率Tr
Transpiration rate (μmol·m-2.s-1)
气孔导度Gs
Stomatal conductance to water vapor (μmol·m-2.s-1)
胞间CO2浓度Ci
Intercellular CO2 concentration (μmol·m-2.s-1)
676R(WT) 21.65±2.91 4.52±0.36 0.29±0.04 225.04±29.92
gw87 23.16±2.32 4.84±0.22 0.26±0.02 198.56±26.79
与WT相比Compared with WT (%) 7.0 7.1 -10.3 -11.8

Table 5

Segregation of F2 population from the cross between gw87 mutant and its wild-type parent 676R"

F2组合
Combination
总株数
Total No. of plants
正常植株
No. of normal plants
矮秆宽粒植株
No. of plants with dwarf and wide grain
理论比
Expected ratio
χ2
gw87×676R 800 622 178 3﹕1 3.08

Table 6

MutMap results of the gw87 gene, and InDel and SSR makers developed for fine mapping of gw87"

标记名称
SNP and marker name
物理位置
Physical location (bp)
SNP指数
SNP Index
注释基因及碱基突变位点,或分子标记引物序列
Annotated gene and its nucleotide mutation site, or marker primers
SNP01 9834287 0.956 LOC_Os05g17170 downstream, G2464A
SNP02 10490240 0.920 LOC_Os05g18240 downstream, G1713A
SNP03 11888797 0.909 LOC_Os05g20290 upstream, -2662G>A
SNP04 12878107 1 LOC_Os05g22680 downstream,79G>A
SNP05 13399064 0.962 Intergenic_region, LOC_Os05g23430-LOC_Os05g23440,13399064C>T
SNP06 13926842 0.960 LOC_Os05g24140 upstream,-1434C>T
SNP07 13966225 0.958 LOC_Os05g24190 upstream,-3398C>T
SNP08 14365938 0.906 LOC_Os05g24790 upstream,-2425C>T
SNP09 14647328 0.913 LOC_Os05g25240,synonymous,93C>T|p.Cys31Cys
SNP10 14908086 0.960 LOC_Os05g25640 upstream_gene, -3616G>A
X1 18307365 F: TATAGCCAGGATGAGAAG, R: CTGCTGTGGATCATCTTG
X2 18753900 F: GTACCCATCATAGCAAGA, R: AATAGGGTTGGAAGAATG
SNP11 18813290 1 LOC_Os05g32270, splice_donor_variant&intron_variant,1040+1G>A
X3 18854840 F: CTATTTGCTATCGGACAC, R: ATTACTCTTTGGGTTTGG
SNP12 18932427 1 LOC_Os05g32430 downstream,117G>A
X4 18932825 F: CGGCAACAAGAGGAGGAT, R: ACAGCAATGTCCGCAACGGTTTACA
RM163 19251955 F: ATCCATGTGCGCCTTTATGAGGA, R: CGCTACCTCCTTCACTTACTAGT

Fig. 5

Gene mapping and candidate gene analysis of gw87 mutant A: The gw87 locus was mapped to a region between SSR marker RM163 and InDel marker X1 on chromosome 5; B: The locus was narrowed down to a 101-kb genomic region between InDel markers X2 and X3; C: The 101 kb region contains 15 putative genes; D: A single nucleotide G-to-A substitution occurred at position 1041 in candidate gene LOC_Os05g32270 in the gw87 mutant, which was indicated with an arrow. Due to the point mutation, 76 bp of intron sequences were spliced into exons in the cDNA sequence of LOC_Os05g32270 in the mutant. The sequences of extron and intron are shown in upper and lower case, respectively; E: Amplification of LOC_Os05g3227 cDNA containing the specific sequence of 76 bp intron in gw87. M: DL5000 DNA Marker"

Fig. 6

Expression analysis of the genes for BR biosynthesis in gw87 mutant and its wild type (WT) A: The relative transcript levels of OsDWARF4, D11 and D2 in gw87 and its wild type at seedling stage. The transcript level of each gene in wild type was defined as 1, and that in gw87 mutant was calculated accordingly. B: The relative transcript levels of OsDWARF4, D11 and D2 in gw87 and its wild type without or with 100 nmol·L-1 BL treatment for 3 h. Total RNAs were extracted from 0.5 cm of the lamina joints of the first intact leaf"

Fig. 7

Comparison of mutation sites among smos1, shb, rla1, ngr5 and gw87 mutants"

[1] TANKSLEY S D. Mapping polygenes. Annual Review of Genetics, 1993,27(1):205-233.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.001225
[2] YANO M. Genetic and molecular dissection of naturally occurring variation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2001,4(2):130-135.
doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00148-5
[3] SONG X J, HUANG W, SHI M, ZHU M Z, LIN H X. A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nature Genetics, 2007,39(5):623-630.
doi: 10.1038/ng2014
[4] SHOMURA A, IZAWA T, EBANA K, EBITANI T, KANEGAE H, KONISHI S, YANO M. Deletion in a gene associated with grain size increased yields during rice domestication. Nature Genetics, 2008,40(8):1023-1028.
doi: 10.1038/ng.169
[5] WENG J F, GU S H, WAN X Y, GAO H, GUO T, SU N, LEI C L, ZHANG X, CHENG Z J, GUO X P, WANG J L, JIANG L, ZHAI H Q, WAN J M. Isolation and initial characterization of GW5, a major QTL associated with rice grain width and weight. Cell Research, 2008,18(12):1199-1209.
doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.307
[6] LI Y B, FAN C C, XING Y Z, JIANG Y H, LUO L J, SUN L, SHAO D, XU C J, LI X H, XIAO J H, HE Y Q, ZHANG Q F. Natural variation in GS5 plays an important role in regulating grain size and yield in rice. Nature Genetics, 2011,43(12):1266-1269.
doi: 10.1038/ng.977
[7] XU C J, LIU Y, LI Y B, XU X D, XU C G, LI X H, XIAO J H, ZHANG Q F. Differential expression of GS5 regulates grain size in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015,66(9):2611-2623.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv058
[8] WANG S K, WU K, YUAN Q B, LIU X Y, LIU Z B, LIN X Y, ZENG R Z, ZHU H T, DONG G J, QIAN Q, ZHANG G Q, FU X D. Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice. Nature Genetics, 2012,44(8):950-954.
doi: 10.1038/ng.2327
[9] WANG S K, LI S, LIU Q, WU K, ZHANG J Q, WANG S S, WANG Y, CHEN X B, ZHANG Y, GAO C X, WANG F, HUANG H X, FU X D. The OsSPL16-GW7 regulatory module determines grain shape and simultaneously improves rice yield and grain quality. Nature Genetics, 2015,47(8):949-954.
doi: 10.1038/ng.3352
[10] TONG H N, CHU C C. Functional specificities of brassinosteroid and potential utilization for crop improvement. Trends in Plant Science, 2018,23(11):1016-1028.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.08.007
[11] PLANAS-RIVEROLA A, GUPTA A, BETEGÓN-PUTZE I, BOSCH N, IBAÑES M, CAÑO-DELGADO A I. Brassinosteroid signaling in plant development and adaptation to stress. Development,2019,146, dev151894.
[12] SAKAMOTO T, MORINAKA Y, OHNISHI T, SUNOHARA H, FUJIOKA S, UEGUCHI-TANAKA M, MIZUTANI M, SAKATA K, TAKATSUTO S, YOSHIDA S, TANAKA H, KITANO H, MATSUOKA M. Erect leaves caused by brassinosteroid deficiency increase biomass production and grain yield in rice. Nature Biotechnology, 2006,24(1):105-109.
doi: 10.1038/nbt1173
[13] HONG Z, UEGUCHI-TANAKA M, UMEMURA K, UOZU S, FUJIOKA S, TAKATSUTO S, YOSHIDA S, ASHIKARI M, KITANO H, MATSUOKA M. A rice brassinosteroid-deficient mutant, ebisu dwarf (d2), is caused by a loss of function of a new member of cytochrome P450. The Plant Cell, 2003,15(12):2900-2910.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.014712
[14] TANABE S, ASHIKARI M, FUJIOKA S, TAKATSUTO S, YOSHIDA S, YANO M, YOSHIMURA A, KITANO H, MATSUOKA M, FUJISAWA Y, KATO H, IWASAKI Y. A novel cytochrome P450 is implicated in brassinosteroid biosynthesis via the characterization of a rice dwarf mutant, dwarf11, with reduced seed length. The Plant Cell, 2005,17(3):776-790.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.024950
[15] HONG Z, UEGUCHI-TANAKA M, SHIMIZU-SATO S, INUKAI Y, FUJIOKA S, SHIMADA Y, TAKATSUTO S, AGETSUMA M, YOSHIDA S, WATANABE Y, UOZU S, KITANO H, ASHIKARI M, MATSUOKA M. Loss-of-function of a rice brassinosteroid biosynthetic enzyme, C-6 oxidase, prevents the organized arrangement and polar elongation of cells in the leaves and stem. The Plant Journal, 2002,32(4):495-508.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01438.x
[16] LIU X, FENG Z M, ZHOU C L, REN Y K, MOU C L, WU T, YANG C Y, LIU S J, JIANG L, WAN J M. Brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthetic gene lhdd10 controls late heading and plant height in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Reports, 2016,35(2):357-368.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-015-1889-3
[17] YAMAMURO C, IHARA Y, WU X, NOGUCHI T, FUJIOKA S, TAKATSUTO S, ASHIKARI M, KITANO H, MATSUOKA M. Loss of function of a rice brassinosteroid insensitive1 homolog prevents internode elongation and bending of the lamina joint. The Plant Cell, 2000,12(9):1591-1605.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1591
[18] MORINAKA Y, SAKAMOTO T, INUKAI Y, AGETSUMA M, KITANO H, ASHIKARI M, MATSUOKA M. Morphological alteration caused by brassinosteroid insensitivity increases the biomass and grain production of rice. Plant Physiology, 2006,141:924-931.
doi: 10.1104/pp.106.077081
[19] CHE R H, TONG H N, SHI B H, LIU Y Q, FANG S R, LIU D P, XIAO Y H, HU B, LIU L C, WANG H R, ZHAO M F, CHU C C. Control of grain size and rice yield by GL2-mediated brassinosteroid responses. Nature Plants, 2015,2(1):15195.
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.195
[20] TONG H N, LIU L C, JIN Y, DU L, YIN Y H, QIAN Q, ZHU L H, CHU C C. DWARF AND LOW-TILLERING acts as a direct downstream target of a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase to mediate brassinosteroid responses in rice. The Plant Cell, 2012,24(6):2562-2577.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.097394
[21] SUN L J, LI X J, FU Y C, ZHU Z F, TAN L B, LIU F X, SUN X Y, SUN X W, SUN C Q. GS6, a member of the gras gene family, negatively regulates grain size in rice. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2013,55(10):938-949.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.12062
[22] QIAO S L, SUN S Y, WANG L L, WU Z H, LI C X, LI X M, WANG T, LENG L N, TIAN W S, LU T G, WANG X L. The RLA1/SMOS1 transcription factor functions with OsBZR1 to regulate brassinosteroid signaling and rice architecture. The Plant Cell, 2017,29(2):292-309.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00611
[23] AYA K, HOBO T, SATO-IZAWA K, UEGUCHI-TANAKA M, KITANO H, MATSUOKA M. A novel AP2-type transcription factor, SMALL ORGAN SIZE1, controls organ size downstream of an auxin signaling pathway. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2014,55(5):897-912.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu023
[24] HIRANO K, YOSHIDA H, AYA K, KAWAMURA M, HAYASHI M, HOBO T, SATO-IZAWA K, KITANO H, UEGUCHI-TANAKA M, MATSUOKA M. SMALL ORGAN SIZE 1 and SMALL ORGAN SIZE 2/DWARF AND LOW-TILLERING form a complex to integrate auxin and brassinosteroid signaling in rice. Molecular Plant, 2017,10(4):590-604.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.013
[25] TONG H N, CHU C C. Physiological analysis of brassinosteroid responses and sensitivity in rice. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2017,1564:23-29.
[26] LICHTENTHALER H K, WELLBURN A R. Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions, 1983,11(5):591-592.
doi: 10.1042/bst0110591
[27] MCCOUCH S R, KOCHERT G, YU Z H, WANG Z Y, KHUSH G S, COFFMANW R, TANKLEY S D. Molecular mapping of rice chromosomes. The Oretical and Applied Genet, 1988,76(6):815-829.
[28] LI J T, ZHAO Y, CHU H W, WANG L K, FU Y R, LIU P, UPADHYAYA N, CHEN C L, MOU T M, FENG Y Q, KUMAR P, XU J. SHOEBOX modulates root meristem size in rice through dose-dependent effects of gibberellins on cell elongation and proliferation. PLoS Genetics, 2015,11(8):e1005464.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005464
[29] WU K, WANG S S, SONG W Z, ZHANG J Q, WANG Y, LIU Q, YU J P, YE Y F, LI S, CHEN J F, ZHAO Y, WANG J, WU X K, WANG M Y, ZHANG Y J, LIU B M, WU Y J, HARBERD N P, FU X D. Enhanced sustainable green revolution yield via nitrogen-responsive chromatin modulation in rice. Science, 2020,367(6478): eaaz2046.
[1] FENG XiangQian,YIN Min,WANG MengJia,MA HengYu,CHU Guang,LIU YuanHui,XU ChunMei,ZHANG XiuFu,ZHANG YunBo,WANG DanYing,CHEN Song. Effects of Meteorological Factors on Quality of Late Japonica Rice During Late Season Grain Filling Stage Under ‘Early Indica and Late Japonica’ Cultivation Pattern in Southern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 46-63.
[2] WANG HaoLin,MA Yue,LI YongHua,LI Chao,ZHAO MingQin,YUAN AiJing,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui. Optimal Management of Phosphorus Fertilization Based on the Yield and Grain Manganese Concentration of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[3] GUI RunFei,WANG ZaiMan,PAN ShengGang,ZHANG MingHua,TANG XiangRu,MO ZhaoWen. Effects of Nitrogen-Reducing Side Deep Application of Liquid Fertilizer at Tillering Stage on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Fragrant Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[4] ZHANG JiaHua,YANG HengShan,ZHANG YuQin,LI CongFeng,ZHANG RuiFu,TAI JiCheng,ZHOU YangChen. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Modes on Starch Accumulation and Activities of Starch Synthesis-Related Enzyme of Spring Maize Grain in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1332-1345.
[5] YANG Hong,CAO WenMing,CHEN HeYan,WEI XueQing,SHU LiDan,LI Tong. Risks and Their Prevention and Control of Modified Mycotoxins in Grain and Its Products [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1213-1226.
[6] ZHAO Ling, ZHANG Yong, WEI XiaoDong, LIANG WenHua, ZHAO ChunFang, ZHOU LiHui, YAO Shu, WANG CaiLin, ZHANG YaDong. Mapping of QTLs for Chlorophyll Content in Flag Leaves of Rice on High-Density Bin Map [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 825-836.
[7] JIANG JingJing,ZHOU TianYang,WEI ChenHua,WU JiaNing,ZHANG Hao,LIU LiJun,WANG ZhiQin,GU JunFei,YANG JianChang. Effects of Crop Management Practices on Grain Quality of Superior and Inferior Spikelets of Super Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 874-889.
[8] HUANG ZhaoFu, LI LuLu, HOU LiangYu, GAO Shang, MING Bo, XIE RuiZhi, HOU Peng, WANG KeRu, XUE Jun, LI ShaoKun. Accumulated Temperature Requirement for Field Stalk Dehydration After Maize Physiological Maturity in Different Planting Regions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 680-691.
[9] PANG HaoWan,FU QianKun,YANG QingQing,ZHANG YuanYuan,FU FengLing,YU HaoQiang. Maize Transcription Factor ZmEREB93 Negatively Regulates Kernel Development [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3685-3696.
[10] WANG ChuHan,LIU Fei,GAO JianYong,ZHANG HuiFang,XIE YingHe,CAO HanBing,XIE JunYu. The Variation Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon Component Content Under Nitrogen Reduction and Film Mulching [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3779-3790.
[11] LinHan ZOU,XinYing ZHOU,ZeYuan ZHANG,Rui YU,Meng YUAN,XiaoPeng SONG,JunTao JIAN,ChuanLiang ZHANG,DeJun HAN,QuanHao SONG. QTL Mapping of Thousand-Grain-Weight and Its Related Traits in Zhou 8425B × Xiaoyan 81 Population and Haplotype Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3473-3483.
[12] RU Chen,HU XiaoTao,LÜ MengWei,CHEN DianYu,WANG WenE,SONG TianYuan. Effects of Nitrogen on Nitrogen Accumulation and Distribution, Nitrogen Metabolizing Enzymes, Protein Content, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat Under Heat and Drought Stress After Anthesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3303-3320.
[13] WANG JinSong,DONG ErWei,LIU QiuXia,WU AiLian,WANG Yuan,WANG LiGe,JIAO XiaoYan. Effects of Row Spacing and Plant Density on Grain Yield and Quality of Grain-Feeding Sorghum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3123-3133.
[14] MA Yue,TIAN Yi,MU WenYan,ZHANG XueMei,ZHANG LuLu,YU Jie,LI YongHua,WANG HaoLin,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui,QIU WeiHong. Response of Wheat Yield and Grain Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Concentrations to Test-Integrated Potassium Application and Soil Available Potassium in Northern Wheat Production Regions of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3155-3169.
[15] GAO RenCai,CHEN SongHe,MA HongLiang,MO Piao,LIU WeiWei,XIAO Yun,ZHANG Xue,FAN GaoQiong. Straw Mulching from Autumn Fallow and Reducing Nitrogen Application Improved Grain Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Winter Wheat by Optimizing Root Distribution [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2709-2725.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!