Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (15): 3071-3082.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.008

• SPECIAL FOCUS: INTEGRATED AGRONOMIC MANAGEMENT CLOSE THE YIELD GAP • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Tillage and Straw Incorporation Method on Root Trait at Silking Stage and Grain Yield of Spring Maize in Northeast China

JIANG Ying1(),WANG ZhengYu1,LIAN HongLi1,WANG MeiJia1,SU YeHan1,TIAN Ping1,SUI PengXiang1,MA ZiQi1,WANG YingYan1,MENG GuangXin1,SUN Yue1,LI CongFeng2,QI Hua1()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866
    2Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2020-04-09 Accepted:2020-07-11 Online:2020-08-01 Published:2020-08-06
  • Contact: Hua QI E-mail:jiangying@syau.edu.cn;qihua10@syau.edu.cn

Abstract:

【Objective】In view of the prominent contradiction of straw utility, the optimization of straw returning method is significant for promoting the green and sustainable development of agriculture in northeast China, where is the main production areas of spring maize. In this study, the effects of tillage and straw incorporation approaches on the morphology and distribution characteristics of root, dry matter accumulation and yield of spring maize were investigated to provide a theory basis for optimizing tillage and straw incorporation measures to maintain agricultural production.【Method】The field experiment was carried out in Shenyang, Liaoning province in 2017 and 2018. The two-factor random zone group design was adopted to set up four treatments, including straw incorporation with full-thickness plough tillage (PTS), straw incorporation with strip plough tillage (PSS), straw incorporation with full-thickness rotary tillage (RTS), and straw incorporation with strip rotary tillage (RSS). Under different tillage and straw incorporation methods, the differences of root length, root dry weight, their spatial distribution in soil, dry matter accumulation dynamics and yield characters of spring maize were analyzed.【Result】Tillage and straw incorporation methods had significant effects on root length and distribution as well as dry weight and specific root length of spring maize at silking stage. In the vertical soil layer of 0-30 cm, the root length of PTS treatment was 7.9%-43.2% and 17.3%-41.5% higher than other treatments, respectively. In the vertical soil layer of 30-60 cm, root length under strip straw incorporation (PSS and RSS) treatments was average 20.1% and 20.3% higher than those under full-thickness straw incorporation (PTS and RTS) treatments, respectively. Centering on maize plant, the horizontal distribution of root length in soil showed that PTS treatment was the highest and RTS treatment was the lowest in 0-10 cm away from the plant. The lowest root dry weight was observed from RTS treatment, PTS, PSS and RSS treatments presented 36.5%, 59.6% and 17.3% higher root dry weight in the 0-10 cm soil layer, respectively. PTS treatment obtained the highest specific root length in 0-20 cm soil layers, with 8.7%-73.8% and 14.3%-44.7% more than those under other treatments. The spatial distribution of root surface area was significantly different among treatments. PTS and RSS treatments had higher root surface area in 0-30 cm soil layer and better root surface distribution in horizontal and vertical directions. The effects of tillage and straw incorporation methods on the accumulation of dry matter in shoot of spring maize at jointing, silking and maturity stages were significant. Compared with other three treatments, RTS reduced the average dry matter weight of stem+sheath and total shoot weight by 15.5% to 19.2% at jointing stage. The weight of ear and shoot dry matter in maturity stage under PTS treatment was 3.6%-12.3% and 2.7%-12.4% higher than those under other treatments, followed by PSS and RSS treatments, and RTS treatment was the lowest. Tillage and straw incorporation methods significantly affected the number of ears and grain yield of spring maize. PTS, PSS, and RSS treatments obtained average 8.3%, 7.9%, and 5.8% higher grain yield than that under RTS treatments in 2017 and 2018. RTS significantly reduced the number of ears by 2.9%-9.1% and 7.0%-9.7%, compared with other three treatments.【Conclusion】Proper tillage and straw returning methods were conducive to promoting the morphological development of crop root and its spatial distribution in the tilled soil layer, optimizing of dry matter accumulation and distribution characteristics, and the distribution of dry matter to ear at maturity, so as to increase the yield of spring maize. In summary, the straw strip returning with plough tillage was recommended in the study area.

Key words: straw incorporation, spring maize, root distribution, grain yield

Fig. 1

Mean daily precipitation and air temperature during crop growth stage in 2017 and 2018"

Fig. 2

Diagram of experimental treatments in the field PTS: Straw incorporation with full-thickness plough tillage; PSS: Straw incorporation with strip plough tillage; RTS: Straw incorporation with full-thickness rotary tillage; RSS: Straw incorporation with strip rotary tillage. The same as below"

Table 1

Effects of tillage and straw incorporation methods on root length and its distribution of spring maize at silking stage (m)"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
垂直根长分布
Vertical root length distribution
水平根长分布
Horizontal root length distribution
总根长
Total root length
0-30 cm 30-60 cm 0-10 cm 10-20 cm 20-30 cm
2017 PTS 454.8a 80.3b 290.7a 157.7a 80.3b 535.1a
PSS 421.4a 102.5a 281.4a 133.5b 102.4a 523.9a
RTS 317.6b 79.8b 209.3b 105.2c 82.9b 397.4b
RSS 383.2ab 111.5a 280.3a 136.6b 99.8a 494.7a
2018 PTS 508.6a 272.4c 422.8a 189.7ab 168.4a 780.9a
PSS 433.5b 301.0ab 369.2c 216.2a 149.1b 734.5b
RTS 359.8d 289.9b 349.7d 169.3b 130.7b 649.7c
RSS 391.4c 339.9a 381.6a 196.8ab 152.9a 731.3b
方差分析(F值)ANOVA (F-value)
T 9.11** 7.05 0.25* 0.17** 21.25 35.65**
S 3.17* 1.98** 9.66* 2.39* 1.89** 26.36**
T×S 0.275** 8.14* 1.37* 1.94* 9.21* 5.32**

Fig. 3

Effects of tillage and straw incorporation methods on root dry weight of spring maize at silking stage"

Fig. 4

Effects of tillage and straw incorporation methods on specific root length of spring maize at silking stage"

Fig. 5

Effects of tillage and straw incorporation methods on root surface area of spring maize at silking stage"

Table 2

Effects of tillage and straw incorporation methods on shoot dry matter at jointing, silking and mature stages of spring maize (g/plant)"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
拔节期Jointing stage 吐丝期Silking stage 成熟期Maturity stage

Leave
茎鞘
Stem
地上部
Shoot

Leave
茎鞘
Stem
果穗
Fruit
地上部
Shoot

Leave
茎鞘
Stem
果穗
Fruit
地上部
Shoot
2017 PTS 35.8a 34.7a 70.5a 48.5a 72.2a 33.8a 154.5a 45.5a 88.9a 220.3a 354.5a
PSS 36.6a 34.3a 70.9a 50.7a 71.2a 31.2a 153.1a 42.2a 80.6a 209.6b 332.4ab
RTS 32.5a 29.1b 61.6b 44.5a 68.6a 32.8a 145.9b 37.4b 71.5b 207.2b 315.6b
RSS 38.0a 34.1a 72.1a 42.1a 76.1a 31.3a 149.5ab 42.9a 85.7a 213.6ab 342.3a
2018 PTS 45.9a 42.5b 88.4ab 46.9a 72.3a 50.4a 169.6a 68.2b 93.5a 233.9a 395.6a
PSS 41.4a 53.9a 95.3a 48.2a 71.7a 43.5b 163.4a 65.3b 85.7ab 218.6ab 369.6b
RTS 38.4b 40.8b 79.2b 46.5a 65.4b 41.9b 153.8b 60.8b 80.7b 210.4b 351.9b
RSS 43.2a 52.9a 96.1a 48.0a 73.8a 44.4b 166.2a 78.1a 86.9ab 220.1a 385.1a
方差分析(F值)ANOVA (F-value)
T 3.15 0.87 10.32 0.69 12.87** 6.37* 19.56* 30.69 2.79* 10.27* 17.32*
S 5..62 5.21* 8.65** 2.16* 8.21 4.15 25.21 12.16 1.17 6.71 4.65**
T×S 2.36 3.56 1.32* 3.65 3.56 0.89 4.01* 9.65 1.68 5.56* 3.32*

Table 3

Effects of tillage and straw incorporation approach on grain yield and yield components of spring maize"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
穗数
Ear number (hm-2)
穗粒数
Kernel number
百粒重
100-kernel weight (g)
产量
Yield (kg·hm-2)
2017 PTS 65741a 497a 31.2a 9762.9a
PSS 66056a 500a 30.5a 9812.2a
RTS 60574c 495a 29.4a 9128.8b
RSS 62352b 508a 30.4a 9418.3ab
2018 PTS 67364a 513a 36.8a 10100.5a
PSS 65741b 509a 35.9a 9981.3a
RTS 61420c 486b 36.2a 9209.5b
RSS 66660ab 508a 34.7a 9994.9a
方差分析(F值)ANOVA (F-value)
T 3.341** 0.254 0.126 6.326**
S 0.487* 0.311 0.177 5.275
T×S 0.297** 0.754 0.266 0.222*
[1] 宋大利, 侯胜鹏, 王秀斌, 梁国庆, 周卫. 中国秸秆养分资源数量及替代化肥潜力. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(1):1-21.
SONG D L, HOU S P, WANG X B, LIANG G Q, ZHOU W. Nutrient resource quantity of crop straw and its potential of substituting. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018,24(1):1-21. (in Chinese)
[2] KONG L. Maize residues, soil quality, and wheat growth in China. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2014,34:405-416.
[3] 隋鹏祥, 有德宝, 安俊朋, 张文可, 田平, 梅楠, 王美佳, 王沣, 苏思慧, 齐华. 秸秆还田方式与施氮量对春玉米产量及干物质和氮素积累、转运的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(2):316-324.
SUI P X, YOU D B, AN J P, ZHANG W K, TIAN P, MEI N, WANG M J, WANG F, SU S H, QI H. Effects of straw management and nitrogen application on spring maize yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and transfer. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018,24(2):316-324. (in Chinese)
[4] 田平, 姜英, 孙悦, 马梓淇, 隋鹏祥, 梅楠, 齐华. 不同还田方式对玉米秸秆腐解及土壤养分含量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2019,27(1):100-108.
TIAN P, JIANG Y, SUN Y, MA Z Q, SUI P X, MEI N, QI H. Effect of straw return methods on maize straw decomposition and soil nutrients contents. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019,27(1):100-108. (in Chinese)
[5] 杨文钰, 王兰英. 作物秸秆还田的现状与展望. 四川农业大学学报, 1999(2):211-216.
YANG W Y, WANG L Y. Present situation and prospects of returning application of crop straw. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 1999(2):211-216. (in Chinese)
[6] KUMAR K, GOH K M. Nitrogen release from crop residues and organic amendments as affected by biochemical composition. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 34(17/18):2441-2460.
[7] TURMEL M S, SPERATTI A, BAUDRON F, VERHULST N, GOVAERTS B. Crop residue management and soil health: A systems analysis. Agricultural Systems, 2014,134:6-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.009
[8] LI Z Q, ZHAO B Z, OLK D C, JIA Z J, MAO J D, CAI Y F, ZHANG J B. Contributions of residue-C and -N to plant growth and soil organic matter pools under planted and unplanted conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018,120:91-104.
[9] 赵亚丽, 郭海斌, 薛志伟, 穆心愿, 李潮海. 耕作方式与秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作系统中干物质生产和水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2014,40(10):1797-1807.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01797
ZHAO Y L, GUO H B, XUE Z W, MU X Y, LI C H. Effects of tillage and straw returning on biomass and water use efficiency in a winter wheat and summer maize rotation system. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014,40(10):1797-1807. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01797
[10] 赵红香, 迟淑筠, 宁堂原, 田慎重, 王丙文, 李增嘉. 科学耕作与留茬改良小麦-玉米两熟农田土壤物理性状及增产效果. 农业工程学报, 2013,29(9):113-122.
ZHAO H X, CHI S Y, NING T Y, TIAN S Z, WANG B W, LI Z J. Covering farming pattern to improve soil physical properties and crop yield in wheat-maize cropping system. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013,29(9):113-122. (in Chinese)
[11] 许菁, 贺贞昆, 冯倩倩, 张亚运, 李晓莎, 许姣姣, 林祥, 韩惠芳, 宁堂原, 李增嘉. 耕作方式对冬小麦-夏玉米光合特性及周年产量形成的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23(1):101-109.
XU J, HE Z K, FENG Q Q, ZHANG Y Y, LI X S, XU J J, LIN X, HAN H F, NING T Y, LI Z J. Effect of tillage method on photosynthetic characteristics and annual yield formation of winter wheat-summer maize cropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2017,23(1):101-109. (in Chinese)
[12] 苏思慧, 王美佳, 张文可, 隋鹏祥, 王沣, 齐华. 耕作方式与玉米秸秆条带还田对土壤水稳性团聚体和有机碳分布的影响. 土壤通报, 2018,49(4):841-847.
SU S H, WANG M J, ZHANG W K, SUI P X, WANG F, QI H. Effects of tillage practices and maize straw incorporation on water-stable aggregates and organic carbon in soils. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2018,49(4):841-847. (in Chinese)
[13] 代红翠, 张慧, 薛艳芳, 高英波, 钱欣, 赵海军, 成浩, 李宗新, 刘开昌. 不同耕作和秸秆还田下褐土真菌群落变化特征. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(13):2280-2294.
DAI H C, ZHANG H, XUE Y F, GAO Y B, QIAN X, ZHAO H J, CHENG H, LI Z X, LIU K C. Response of fungal community and function to different tillage and straw returning methods. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019,52(13):2280-2294. (in Chinese)
[14] ZHANG P, WEI T, JIA Z K, HAN Q F, REN X L, LI Y P. Effects of straw incorporation on soil organic matter and soil water-stable aggregates content in semiarid regions of northwest China. PLoS ONE, 2014,9(3):e92839.
pmid: 24663096
[15] ZHANG P, CHEN X L, WEI T, YANG Z, JIA Z K, YANG B P, HAN Q F, REN X L. Effects of straw incorporation on the soil nutrient contents, enzyme activities, and crop yield in a semiarid region of China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2016,160:65-72.
[16] 殷文, 冯福学, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强, 胡发龙, 郭瑶. 小麦秸秆还田方式对轮作玉米干物质累积分配及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2016,42(5):751-757.
YIN W, FENG F X, ZHAO C, YU A Z, CHAI Q, HU F L, GUO Y. Effects of wheat straw returning patterns on characteristics of dry matter accumulation, distribution and yield of rotation maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016,42(5):751-757. (in Chinese)
[17] 殷文, 柴强, 胡发龙, 樊志龙, 范虹, 于爱忠, 赵财. 干旱内陆灌区不同秸秆还田方式下春小麦田土壤水分利用特征. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(7):1247-1259.
YIN W, CHAI Q, HU F L, FAN Z L, FAN H, YU A Z, ZHAO C. Characteristics of soil water utilization in spring wheat field with different straw retention approaches in dry inland irrigation areas. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019,52(7):1247-1259. (in Chinese)
[18] 穆心愿, 赵霞, 谷利敏, 冀保毅, 丁勇, 张凤启, 张君, 齐建双, 马智艳, 夏来坤, 唐保军. 秸秆还田量对不同基因型夏玉米产量及干物质转运的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020,53(1):29-41.
MU X Y, ZHAO X, GU L M, JI B Y, DING Y, ZHANG F Q, ZHANG J, QI J S, MA Z Y, XIA L K, TANG B J. Effects of straw returning amount on grain yield, dry matter accumulation and transfer in summer maize with different genotypes. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020,53(1):29-41. (in Chinese)
[19] MU X Y, ZHAO Y L, LIU K, JI B Y, GUO H B, XUE Z W, LI C H. Responses of soil properties, root growth and crop yield to tillage and crop residue management in a wheat-maize cropping system on the North China Plain. European Journal of Agronomy, 2016,78:32-43.
[20] YOU D B, TIAN P, SUI P X, ZHANG W K, YANG B, QI H. Short-term effects of tillage and residue on spring maize yield through regulating root-shoot ratio in northeast China. Scientific Reports, 2017,7:13314.
pmid: 29042601
[21] SUI P X, TIAN P, LIAN H L, WANG Z Y, MA Z Q, QI H, MEI N, SUN Y, WANG Y Y, SU Y H, MENG G X, JIANG Y. Straw incorporation management affects maize grain yield through regulating nitrogen uptake, water use efficiency, and root distribution. Agronomy, 2020,10(3):324.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy10030324
[22] YANG H S, YANG B, DAI Y J, XU M M, KOIDE R T, WANG X H, LIU J, BIAN X M. Soil nitrogen retention is increased by ditch-buried straw return in a rice-wheat rotation system. European Journal of Agronomy, 2015,69:52-58.
[23] 安俊朋, 李从锋, 齐华, 隋鹏祥, 张文可, 田平, 有德宝, 梅楠, 邢静. 秸秆条带还田对东北春玉米产量、土壤水氮及根系分布的影响. 作物学报, 2018,44(5):774-782.
AN J P, LI C F, QI H, SUI P X, ZHANG W K, TIAN P, YOU D B, MEI N, XING J. Effects of straw strip returning on spring maize yield, soil moisture, nitrogen contents and root distribution in northeast China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018,44(5):774-782. (in Chinese)
[24] 张文可, 苏思慧, 隋鹏祥, 田平, 梅楠, 王沣, 王美佳, 张姣, 齐华. 秸秆还田模式对东北春玉米根系分布和水分利用效率的影响. 生态学杂志, 2018,37(8):2300-2308.
ZHANG W K, SU S H, SUI P X, TIAN P, MEI N, WANG F, WANG M J, ZHANG J, QI H. Effects of straw incorporation modes on root distribution and water use efficiency of spring maize in northeast China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018,37(8):2300-2308. (in Chinese)
[25] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 34-35, 44-49, 56-58, 81, 106-107.
BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 34-35, 44-49, 56-58, 81, 106-107. (in Chinese)
[26] KUCHENBUCH R O, GERKE H H, BUCZKO U. Spatial distribution of maize roots by complete 3D soil monolith sampling. Plant and Soil, 2009,315:297-314.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9752-8
[27] KASHIWAGI J, KRISHNAMURTHY L, PURUSHOTHAMAN R, UPADHYAYA H D, GAUR P M, GOWDA C L L, ITO O, VARSHNEY R K. Scope for improvement of yield under drought through the root traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Research, 2015,170:47-54.
[28] CAI H G, MA W, ZHANG X Z, PING Z Q, YAN X G, LIU J Z, YUAN J C, WANG L C, REN J. Effect of subsoil tillage depth on nutrient accumulation, root distribution, and grain yield in spring maize. The Crop Journal, 2014,2(5):297-307.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2014.04.006
[29] REN B Z, LI X, DONG S T, LIU P, ZHAN B, ZHANG J W. Soil physical properties and maize root growth under different tillage systems in the North China Plain. The Crop Journal, 2018,6:669-676.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2018.05.009
[30] XU X, PANG D W, CHEN J, LUO Y L, ZHENG M J, YIN Y P, LI Y X, LI Y, WANG Z L. Straw return accompany with low nitrogen moderately promoted deep root. Field Crops Research, 2018,221:71-80.
[31] BURTON A L, LYNCH J P, BROWN K M. Spatial distribution and phenotypic variation in root cortical aerenchyma of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant and Soil, 2013,367:263-274.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1453-7
[32] BIAN D H, JIA G P, CAI L J, MA Z Y, ENEJI A E, CUI Y H. Effects of tillage practices on root characteristics and root lodging resistance of maize. Field Crops Research, 2016,185:89-96.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.008
[33] 王沣, 王美佳, 苏思慧, 王英俨, 苏业涵, 孟广鑫, 孙悦, 齐华, 姜英. 水分胁迫下秸秆还田对玉米产量和根系空间分布的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018,29(11):3643-3648.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201811.023 pmid: 30460811
WANG F, WANG M J, SU S H, WANG Y Y, SU Y H, MENG G X, SUN Y, QI H, JIANG Y. Effects of straw returning on maize yield and root system spatial distribution under water stress. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018,29(11):3643-3648. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201811.023 pmid: 30460811
[34] TIAN P, SUI P X, LIAN H L, WANG Z Y, MENG G X, SUN Y, WANG Y Y, SU Y H, MA Z Q, QI H, JIANG Y. Maize straw returning approaches affected straw decomposition and soil carbon and nitrogen storage in northeast China. Agronomy, 2019,9:818.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy9120818
[35] DORDAS C. Variation in dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in barley as affected by fertilization, cultivar, and source-sink relations. European Journal of Agronomy, 2012,37:31-42.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2011.10.002
[1] XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[2] WANG HaoLin,MA Yue,LI YongHua,LI Chao,ZHAO MingQin,YUAN AiJing,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui. Optimal Management of Phosphorus Fertilization Based on the Yield and Grain Manganese Concentration of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[3] GUI RunFei,WANG ZaiMan,PAN ShengGang,ZHANG MingHua,TANG XiangRu,MO ZhaoWen. Effects of Nitrogen-Reducing Side Deep Application of Liquid Fertilizer at Tillering Stage on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Fragrant Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[4] ZHANG JiaHua,YANG HengShan,ZHANG YuQin,LI CongFeng,ZHANG RuiFu,TAI JiCheng,ZHOU YangChen. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Modes on Starch Accumulation and Activities of Starch Synthesis-Related Enzyme of Spring Maize Grain in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1332-1345.
[5] WANG ChuHan,LIU Fei,GAO JianYong,ZHANG HuiFang,XIE YingHe,CAO HanBing,XIE JunYu. The Variation Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon Component Content Under Nitrogen Reduction and Film Mulching [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3779-3790.
[6] RU Chen,HU XiaoTao,LÜ MengWei,CHEN DianYu,WANG WenE,SONG TianYuan. Effects of Nitrogen on Nitrogen Accumulation and Distribution, Nitrogen Metabolizing Enzymes, Protein Content, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat Under Heat and Drought Stress After Anthesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3303-3320.
[7] MA Yue,TIAN Yi,MU WenYan,ZHANG XueMei,ZHANG LuLu,YU Jie,LI YongHua,WANG HaoLin,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui,QIU WeiHong. Response of Wheat Yield and Grain Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Concentrations to Test-Integrated Potassium Application and Soil Available Potassium in Northern Wheat Production Regions of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3155-3169.
[8] GAO RenCai,CHEN SongHe,MA HongLiang,MO Piao,LIU WeiWei,XIAO Yun,ZHANG Xue,FAN GaoQiong. Straw Mulching from Autumn Fallow and Reducing Nitrogen Application Improved Grain Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Winter Wheat by Optimizing Root Distribution [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2709-2725.
[9] XU FangLei,ZHANG Jie,LI Yang,ZHANG WeiWei,BO QiFei,LI ShiQing,YUE ShanChao. Effects of Fertilization Methods on Ammonia Volatilization of Spring Maize in Dry Farming on the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2360-2371.
[10] LIU QiuYuan,ZHOU Lei,TIAN JinYu,CHENG Shuang,TAO Yu,XING ZhiPeng,LIU GuoDong,WEI HaiYan,ZHANG HongCheng. Comprehensive Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency and Screening of Varieties with High Grain Yield and High Nitrogen Efficiency of Inbred Middle-Ripe Japonica Rice in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1397-1409.
[11] PENG BiLin,LI MeiJuan,HU XiangYu,ZHONG XuHua,TANG XiangRu,LIU YanZhuo,LIANG KaiMing,PAN JunFeng,HUANG NongRong,FU YouQiang,HU Rui. Effects of Simplified Nitrogen Managements on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Double-Cropping Rice in South China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1424-1438.
[12] CHU Guang,XU Ran,CHEN Song,XU ChunMei,WANG DanYing,ZHANG XiuFu. Effects of Alternate Wetting and Soil Drying on the Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Indica-Japonica Hybrid Rice and Its Physiological Bases [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1499-1511.
[13] LI JiangLing,YANG Lan,RUAN RenWu,LI ZhongAn. Analysis of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Hybrid Wheat at Seedling Stage and Its Use for Early Prediction of Strong Heterosis Combinations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 4996-5007.
[14] LI E,ZHAO Jin,YE Qing,GAO JiQing,YANG XiaoGuang. The Possible Effects of Global Warming on Cropping Systems in China ⅫⅠ. Precipitation Limitation on Adjusting Maturity Cultivars of Spring Maize and Its Possible Influence on Yield in Three Provinces of Northeastern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3847-3859.
[15] MA Yue,TIAN Yi,YUAN AiJing,WANG HaoLin,LI YongHua,HUANG TingMiao,HUANG Ning,LI Chao,DANG HaiYan,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui,SHI Mei. Response of Wheat Yield and Protein Concentration to Soil Nitrate in Northern Wheat Production Region of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3903-3918.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!