轻简氮肥管理对华南双季稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.07.009

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Simplified nitrogen managements (SNMs) are labor saving methods and could make more profits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation. In view of labor shortage, high labor cost and low fertilizer utilization in rice cultivation of China, the aim of this study was to explore a simplified and efficient application of nitrogen featured by “one basal-dressing and one top-dressing”, so that the amount and frequency of nitrogen application could be reduced, and the profit of rice planting could be improved. 【Method】In order to study the effects of SNMs on the grain yield, dry matter production, nitrogen use efficiency, and grain quality of double-cropping rice in South China, the field experiment was conducted by a conventional indica rice variety of Wu-Shan-Si-Miao, which was designed by a completely randomized block with four replicates. In 2018, 6 treatments were established, i.e. no nitrogen (N0), three-control fertilization (TC), TC with nitrogen reduction (RTC), and 3 simplified nitrogen managements (SNM1, SNM2, and SNM3). In 2019, 6 treatments were also established, i.e. no nitrogen (N0), three-control fertilization (TC), famers’ fertilizer practice (FP), and 3 simplified nitrogen managements (SNM2, SNM4, and SNM5). 【Result】 In the later growing season of 2018, the grain yield of SNM2 was not significantly different from that of TC, but the yields of both treatments were significantly higher than those of RTC, SNM1, and SNM3. In 2019, the grain yields of SNM2, SNM4 and SNM5 were also not significantly different from that of TC. However, compared with FP, the yields of those treatments were increased by 7.36%-7.51%, which was mainly due to the spikelet number per panicle was improved in 2019. And the panicle numbers, spikelet number per panicle, seed setting rate, and 1000-grain weight of SNM2 were not significantly different from TC (except for 1000-grain weight in 2019) for both seasons. In 2018, the nitrogen recovery rate (RE), agronomy use efficiency (AE), physiological use efficiency (PE), nitrogen harvest index (NHI) of SNM2 were all not significantly differed from that of TC, while the partial factor production (PFP_N) of SNM2 was significantly higher than that of TC, and the RE, AE, and PFP_N of the SNM1 and SNM3 were obviously lower than that of SNM2. In 2019, the 5 nitrogen utilization indexes (RE, AE, PE, NHI and PFP_N) of the 3 SNMs were not significantly different with those of TC, but the RE, AE and PFP_N of those treatments were all significantly higher than that of FP. The number of spikelets per unit area, biomass, and nitrogen uptake of the SNMs were all higher than those of FP. In addition, the chalky rice rate of SNM2 was significantly lower than that of TC, but other grain quality of SNMs was not significantly different from that of FP and TC in 2018. 【Conclusion】 The grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of SNM2, which had 10% less nitrogen application and with only basal application and one topdressing in nitrogen management, was similar with TC. However, SNM2 had significantly higher grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency than FP. Additionally, the appearance quality of SNM2 was significantly improved, while the milling quality, cooking and eating quality were not significantly changed. Thus, it could be widely adopted in rice production in South China for its simplified cultivation.

Key words: double-cropping rice in South China, simplified nitrogen managements, grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency, dry matter production

PENG BiLin,LI MeiJuan,HU XiangYu,ZHONG XuHua,TANG XiangRu,LIU YanZhuo,LIANG KaiMing,PAN JunFeng,HUANG NongRong,FU YouQiang,HU Rui. Effects of Simplified Nitrogen Managements on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Double-Cropping Rice in South China[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1424-1438.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.07.009

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2021/V54/I7/1424

Figures/Tables 12

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 1

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

References 38

[1]	Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(FAO): Statistical databases, 2020.http://www.fao.org .
[2]	李逸勉, 叶延琼, 章家恩, 李韵. 广东省水稻产业发展现状与对策分析. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(20):73-82.
	LI Y M, YE Y Q, ZHANG J E, LI Y. Analysis on the development status and countermeasures of rice industry in Guangdong province. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013,29(20):73-82. (in Chinese)
[3]	陈风波, 杨永富, 陈垚垚. 广东省种粮大户机械化生产现状及发展前景分析. 现代农业装备, 2019,40(3):2-8, 26.
	CHEN F B, YANG Y F, CHEN Y Y. Mechanization of rice production for large rice farmers in Guangdong province. Modern Agricultural Equipment, 2019,40(3):2-8, 26. (in Chinese)
[4]	钟旭华, 黄农荣, 郑海波, 彭少兵 , BURESH R J. 水稻“三控”施肥技术规程. 广东农业科学, 2007(5):13-15, 43.
	ZHONG X H, HUANG N R, ZHENG H B, PENG S B, BURESH R J. Specification for the “three controls” nutrient management technology for irrigated rice. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences. 2007(5):13-15, 43. (in Chinese)
[5]	应霄, 陈伟, 姚桂华. 水稻缓控肥“一基一追”的新型施肥方式探索. 南方农业, 2019,13(21):21-23.
	YING X, CHEN W, YAO G H. Fertilization of rice under a new regime of “one basal-dressing and one topdressing” using slow- releasing controlled fertilizers. South China Agriculture, 2019,13(21):21-23. (in Chinese)
[6]	林晶晶. 水稻对基蘖穗肥氮素的吸收利用差异及适宜比例的研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014.
	LIN J J. Studies on absorption and utilization and optimum proportion of nitrogen of basic, tillering and panicle fertilizer in rice[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[7]	PENG S B, CASSMAN K G . Upper thresh holds of nitrogen uptake rates and associated nitrogen fertilizer efficiencies in irrigated rice. Agronomy Journal, 1998,90(2):178-185.
[8]	丁艳锋, 赵长华, 王强盛. 穗肥施用时期对水稻氮素利用及产量的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2003,26(4):5-8.
	DING Y F, ZHAO C H, WANG Q S. Effect of application stage of panicle fertilizer on rice grain yield and the utilization of nitrogen. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2003,26(4):5-8. (in Chinese)
[9]	吉志军. 稻米品质形成对氮素穗肥的响应及生理机制[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2004.
	JI Z J. Response of rice grain quality formation to panicle nitrogen fertilizer and the mechanism underlying[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2004. (in Chinese)
[10]	刘元辉, 郭耀杰, 黄云, 胡剑峰, 任万军. 氮肥后移对不同基因型杂交籼稻碾米与外观品质的影响. 西南农业学报, 2012,25(6):2121-2124.
	LIU Y H, GUO Y J, HUANG Y, HU J F, REN W J. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer postponing on milling quality and appearance quality of indica hybrid rice in different genotypes. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012,25(6):2121-2124. (in Chinese)
[11]	彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 杨建昌, 王光火, 邹应斌, 张福锁, 朱庆森 , BURESH R J, WITT C. 提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略. 中国农业科学, 2002,35(9):1095-1103.
	PENG S B, HUANG J L, ZHONG X H, YANG J C, WANG G H, ZOU Y B, ZHANG F S, ZHU Q S, BURESH R J, WITT C. Research strategy in improving fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002,35(9):1095-1103. (in Chinese)
[12]	赵飞, 李杨, 赵丽华, 向春阳, 裴忠有, 杜锦, 曹高燚, 刘建. 4个粳稻品种在不同种植区的产量和产量构成因素分析. 天津农业科学, 2018,24(6):40-44.
	ZHAO F, LI Y, ZHAO L H, XIANG C Y, PEI Z Y, DU J, CAO G Y, LIU J. Analysis of yield and yield component of 4 kinds japonica rice varieties in different region. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2018,24(6):40-44. (in Chinese)
[13]	高良艳, 周鸿飞. 水稻产量构成因素与产量的分析. 辽宁农业科学, 2007(1):26-28.
	GAO L Y, ZHOU H F. Relationship between yield component factors and yield in rice. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2007(1):26-28. (in Chinese)
[14]	杨安中, 吴文革, 段素梅, 许有尊, 陈刚. 氮肥运筹方式对超级稻茎蘖动态、后期光合性能及产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2014,29(5):65-69.
	YANG A Z, WU W G, DUAN S M, XU Y Z, CHEN G. Effects of nitrogen application modes on tillering dynamic, photosynthetic performance and grain yield of super hybrid rice. Hybrid Rice, 2014,29(5):65-69. (in Chinese)
[15]	沈淳, 吴炜, 吴雄兴, 杨芳凤, 沈嘉秋, 蒋其根. 不同氮肥运筹对优质水稻“青香软粳”产量和品质的影响. 上海农业科技, 2019(6):90-92.
	SHEN C, WU W, WU X X, YANG F F, SHEN J Q, JIANG Q G. Grain yield and quality of high-quality rice variety Qing-Xiang-Ruan- Zhan under different nitrogen management. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(6):90-92. (in Chinese)
[16]	唐湘如, 黎国喜, 钟克友, 肖立中, 段美洋, 田华, 李武. 双季超级稻强源活库优米栽培技术研究Ⅴ.双季超级稻强源活库优米栽培的理论与技术. 杂交水稻, 2010,25(3):74-78.
	TANG X R, LI G X, ZHONG K Y, XIAO L Z, DUAN M Y, TIAN H, LI W. Studies on the cultivation techniques characterized by enhancing source, activating sink and improving quality for double -cropping super rice V. Theory and technology. Hybrid Rice, 2010,25(3):74-78. (in Chinese)
[17]	ZHANG Y B, TANG Q Y, ZOU Y B, LI D Q, QIN J Q, YANG S H, CHEN L Y, XIA B, PENG S B . Yield potential and radiation use efficiency of “super” hybrid rice grown under subtropical conditions. Field Crops Research, 2009,114(1):91-98.
[18]	潘圣刚, 黄胜奇, 张帆, 汪金平, 蔡明历, 曹凑贵, 唐湘如, 黎国喜. 超高产栽培杂交中籼稻的生长发育特性. 作物学报, 2011,37(3):537-544.
	PAN S G, HUANG S Q, ZHANG F, WANG J P, CAI M L, CAO C G, TANG X R, LI G X. Growth and development characteristics of super-high-yielding mid-season indica hybrid rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011,37(3):537-544. (in Chinese)
[19]	冯惟珠, 苏祖芳, 杜永林, 周培南, 季春梅. 水稻灌浆期源质量与产量关系及氮素调控的研究. 中国水稻科学, 2000,14(1):27-33.
	FENG W Z, SU Z F, DU Y L, ZHOU P N, JI C M. Relationship between source quality and grain yield during filling period in rice and its nitrogen-regulation approach. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2000,14(1):27-33. (in Chinese)
[20]	袁小乐, 潘晓华, 石庆华, 吴建富, 漆映雪. 双季超级稻的干物质生产特性研究. 杂交水稻, 2009,24(5):71-75, 79.
	YUAN X Y, PAN X H, SHI Q H, WU J F, QI Y X. Studies on the characteristics of dry matter production in double cropping early and late super rice. Hybrid Rice, 2009,24(5):71-75, 79. (in Chinese)
[21]	ARREGUI L M, LASA B, LAFARGA A, IRAÑETA I, BAROJA E, QUEMADA M,. Evaluation of chlorophyll meters as tools for N fertilization in winter wheat under humid Mediterranean conditions. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006,24(2):140-148.
[22]	YUAN Z, ATA-UL-KARIM ST, CAO Q, LU Z, CAO W, ZHU Y, LIU X. Indicators for diagnosing nitrogen status of rice based on chlorophyll meter readings. Field Crops Research, 2016,185:12-20.
[23]	王允青, 郭熙盛, 戴明伏. 氮肥运筹方式对杂交水稻干物质积累和产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2008(2):31-34.
	WANG Y Q, GUO X S, DAI M F. Effects of nitrogen application on dry matter accumulation and yield of hybrid rice. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2008(2):31-34. (in Chinese)
[24]	范淑秀, 陈温福, 王嘉宇. 高产水稻品种干物质生产特性研究. 辽宁农业科学, 2005(3):6-8.
	FAN S X, CHEN W F, WANG J Y. Studies on production characters of dry matter in high-yield rice. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2005(3):6-8. (in Chinese)
[25]	周中林. 探究高产水稻品种干物质生产特性. 农业与技术, 2015,35(18):24.
	ZHOU Z L. Characterization of dry matter production in high-yielding varieties of rice. Agriculture and Technology, 2015,35(18):24. (in Chinese)
[26]	HUANG M, JIANG L G, XIA B, ZOU Y B, JIANG P, AO H J . Yield gap analysis of super hybrid rice between two subtropical environments. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2013,7(5):600-608.
[27]	吴中福. 不同氮肥施用方式对水稻产量的影响. 农技服务, 2007,24(4):41.
	WU Z F. Rice grain yield under different nitrogen managements. Agricultural Technology and Service, 2007,24(4):41. (in Chinese)
[28]	王仕玥. 氮肥不同用量和施用方法对水稻产量性状的影响. 河北农业科学, 2008,12(6):49-50.
	WANG S Y. Effects of different nitrogen amounts and application methods on the yield characters of rice. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2008,12(6):49-50. (in Chinese)
[29]	许仁良, 戴其根, 王秀芹, 黄银忠, 吕修涛. 氮肥施用量、施用时期及运筹对水稻氮素利用率影响研究. 江苏农业科学, 2005(2):19-22.
	XU R L, DAI Q G, WANG X Q, HUANG Y Z, LÜ X T. Effect of amount, timing and proportion of application on nitrogen use efficiency of rice. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2005(2):19-22. (in Chinese)
[30]	万靓军, 张洪程, 霍中洋, 林忠成, 戴其根, 许轲, 张军. 氮肥运筹对超级杂交粳稻产量、品质及氮素利用率的影响. 作物学报, 2007,33(2):175-182.
	WAN J J, ZHANG H C, HUO Z Y, LIN Z C, DAI Q G, XU K, ZHANG J. Effects of nitrogen application regimes on yield, quality, and nitrogen use efficiency of super japonica hybrid rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007,33(2):175-182. (in Chinese)
[31]	何虎, 吴建富, 曾研华, 黄山, 曾勇军. 稻草全量还田下氮肥运筹对双季晚稻产量及其氮素吸收利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014 , 20(4):811-820.
	HE H, WE J F, ZENG Y H, HUANG S, ZENG Y J. Effects of nitrogen management on yield and nitrogen utilization of double cropping late rice under total rice straw incorporation. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014,20(4):811-820. (in Chinese)
[32]	李鸿伟, 杨凯鹏, 曹转勤, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 稻麦连作中超高产栽培小麦和水稻的养分吸收与积累特征. 作物学报, 2013,39(3):464-477.
	LI H W, YANG K P, CAO Z Q, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Characteristics of nutrient uptake and accumulation in wheat and rice with continuous cropping under super-high-yielding cultivation. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013,39(3):464-477. (in Chinese)
[33]	王秀斌, 徐新朋, 孙刚, 孙静文, 梁国庆, 刘光荣, 周卫. 氮肥用量对双季稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(6):1279-1286.
	WANG X B, XU X P, SUN G, SUN J W, LIANG G Q, LIU G R, ZHOU W. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double cropping rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013,19(6):1279-1286. (in Chinese)
[34]	钟旭华, 黄农荣, 郑海波, 彭少兵 , BURESH R J. 不同时期施氮对华南双季杂交稻产量及氮素吸收和氮肥利用率的影响. 杂交水稻, 2007,22(4):62-66, 70.
	ZHONG X H, HUANG N R, ZHENG H B, PENG S B, BURESH R J. Effect of nitrogen application timing on grain yield, nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of hybrid rice in South China. Hybrid Rice, 2007,22(4):62-66, 70. (in Chinese)
[35]	李刚华, 王惠芝, 王绍华, 王强盛, 郑永美, 丁艳锋. 穗肥对水稻穗分化期碳氮代谢及颖花数的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2010,33(1):1-5.
	LI G H, WANG H Z, WANG S H, WANG Q S, ZHENG Y M, DING Y F. Effect of nitrogen applied at rice panicle initiation stage on carbon and nitrogen metabolism and spikelets per panicle. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2010,33(1):1-5. (in Chinese)
[36]	徐国伟, 王贺正, 翟志华, 孙梦, 李友军. 不同水氮耦合对水稻根系形态生理、产量与氮素利用的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015,31(10):132-141.
	XU G W, WANG H Z, ZHAI Z H, SUN M, LI Y J. Effect of water and nitrogen coupling on root morphology and physiology, yield and nutrition utilization for rice. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015,31(10):132-141. (in Chinese)
[37]	董明辉, 唐成. 不同栽培环境对稻米品质的影响. 耕作与栽培, 2005(3):20-22.
	DONG M H, TANG C. Grain quality of rice under different cultivating environment. Tillage and Cultivation, 2005(3):20-22. (in Chinese)
[38]	WU L L, YUAN S, HUANG L Y, SUN F, ZHU G L, LI G H, FAHAD S H, PENG S B, WANG F . Physiological mechanisms underlying the high-grain yield and high-nitrogen use efficiency of elite rice varieties under a low rate of nitrogen application in China. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016,7:1024.

Related Articles 15

[1]	WANG HaoLin,MA Yue,LI YongHua,LI Chao,ZHAO MingQin,YUAN AiJing,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui. Optimal Management of Phosphorus Fertilization Based on the Yield and Grain Manganese Concentration of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[2]	GUI RunFei,WANG ZaiMan,PAN ShengGang,ZHANG MingHua,TANG XiangRu,MO ZhaoWen. Effects of Nitrogen-Reducing Side Deep Application of Liquid Fertilizer at Tillering Stage on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Fragrant Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[3]	ZHANG JianJun, DANG Yi, ZHAO Gang, WANG Lei, FAN TingLu, LI ShangZhong. Influences of Mulching Periods and Nitrogen Application Rates on Maize Yield as well as Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies in Loess Plateau of Eastern Gansu Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 479-490.
[4]	WANG ChuHan,LIU Fei,GAO JianYong,ZHANG HuiFang,XIE YingHe,CAO HanBing,XIE JunYu. The Variation Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon Component Content Under Nitrogen Reduction and Film Mulching [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3779-3790.
[5]	RU Chen,HU XiaoTao,LÜ MengWei,CHEN DianYu,WANG WenE,SONG TianYuan. Effects of Nitrogen on Nitrogen Accumulation and Distribution, Nitrogen Metabolizing Enzymes, Protein Content, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat Under Heat and Drought Stress After Anthesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3303-3320.
[6]	MA Yue,TIAN Yi,MU WenYan,ZHANG XueMei,ZHANG LuLu,YU Jie,LI YongHua,WANG HaoLin,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui,QIU WeiHong. Response of Wheat Yield and Grain Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Concentrations to Test-Integrated Potassium Application and Soil Available Potassium in Northern Wheat Production Regions of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3155-3169.
[7]	GAO RenCai,CHEN SongHe,MA HongLiang,MO Piao,LIU WeiWei,XIAO Yun,ZHANG Xue,FAN GaoQiong. Straw Mulching from Autumn Fallow and Reducing Nitrogen Application Improved Grain Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Winter Wheat by Optimizing Root Distribution [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2709-2725.
[8]	LU BingLin,CHE ZongXian,ZHANG JiuDong,BAO XingGuo,WU KeSheng,YANG RuiJu. Effects of Long-Term Intercropping of Maize with Hairy Vetch Root Returning to Field on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency Under Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2384-2397.
[9]	LIU QiuYuan,ZHOU Lei,TIAN JinYu,CHENG Shuang,TAO Yu,XING ZhiPeng,LIU GuoDong,WEI HaiYan,ZHANG HongCheng. Comprehensive Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency and Screening of Varieties with High Grain Yield and High Nitrogen Efficiency of Inbred Middle-Ripe Japonica Rice in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1397-1409.
[10]	CHU Guang,XU Ran,CHEN Song,XU ChunMei,WANG DanYing,ZHANG XiuFu. Effects of Alternate Wetting and Soil Drying on the Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Indica-Japonica Hybrid Rice and Its Physiological Bases [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1499-1511.
[11]	LI JiangLing,YANG Lan,RUAN RenWu,LI ZhongAn. Analysis of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Hybrid Wheat at Seedling Stage and Its Use for Early Prediction of Strong Heterosis Combinations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 4996-5007.
[12]	MA Yue,TIAN Yi,YUAN AiJing,WANG HaoLin,LI YongHua,HUANG TingMiao,HUANG Ning,LI Chao,DANG HaiYan,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui,SHI Mei. Response of Wheat Yield and Protein Concentration to Soil Nitrate in Northern Wheat Production Region of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3903-3918.
[13]	FEI ShuaiPeng,YU XiaoLong,LAN Ming,LI Lei,XIA XianChun,HE ZhongHu,XIAO YongGui. Research on Winter Wheat Yield Estimation Based on Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and Ensemble Learning Method [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(16): 3417-3427.
[14]	HOU JiaMin,LUO Ning,WANG Su,MENG QingFeng,WANG Pu. Effects of Increasing Planting Density on Grain Yield, Leaf Area Index and Photosynthetic Rate of Maize in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12): 2538-2546.
[15]	TaoTao YANG,JiaXin XIE,Shan HUANG,XueMing TAN,XiaoHua PAN,YongJun ZENG,QingHua SHI,Jun ZHANG,YanHua ZENG. The Impacts of Post-Anthesis Warming on Grain Yield and Quality of Late Japonica Rice in a Double Rice Cropping System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(7): 1338-1347.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

年份/季节 Year/Season	生育阶段 Growth stage	降雨量 Rainfall (mm)	平均日最高温 Average daily highest temperature (℃)	平均日最低温 Average daily lowest temperature (℃)	辐射量 Radiation (MJ·m^-2)
2018晚季 Late season of 2018	移栽-穗分化始期 Transplanting-Panicle initiation	292.8	32.2	24.8	173
	穗分化始期-抽穗期 Panicle initiation-Heading	55.8	31.2	21.9	203
	抽穗-成熟期 Heading-Maturity	136.8	25.6	17.7	126
2019早季 Early season of 2019	移栽-穗分化始期 Transplanting-Panicle initiation	754.0	26.8	20.9	114
	穗分化始期-抽穗期 Panicle initiation-Heading	383.8	30.5	24.5	139
	抽穗-成熟期 Heading-Maturity	358.2	33.3	25.8	191

年份/季节 Year/Season	处理 Treatment	产量 Grain yield (t·hm^-2)	有效穗数 Panicle number (×10⁴ hm^-2)	每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle	结实率 Seed setting rate (%)	千粒重 1000-grain weight (g)
2018晚季 Late season of 2018	N0	4.45±0.09c	203.7±4.2d	147.6±9.8ab	75.45±1.97c	22.98±0.17bc
	TC	8.10±0.18a	306.8±14.9a	153.7±2.4a	81.15±1.63ab	23.25±0.06b
	RTC	7.39±0.12b	271.4±4.0b	153.6±2.5a	81.93±0.80a	22.90±0.25bc
	SNM1	7.36±0.14b	304.7±7.7a	136.7±5.5b	78.03±0.90bc	22.60±0.16c
	SNM2	7.92±0.23a	309.4+4.0a	156.1±5.0a	80.43±0.35ab	22.93±0.24bc
	SNM3	7.25±0.15b	238.0±4.5c	154.3±3.5a	80.83±0.48ab	23.93±0.29a
F值（F value）		74.28**	29.57**	2.43ns	4.52*	8.22**
2019早季 Early season of 2019	N0	4.79±0.11c	170.8±8.4b	168.1±3.4c	86.09±1.34a	21.33±0.14bc
	FP	6.79±0.27b	226.0±5.7a	168.4±3.7c	85.79±0.61a	21.86±0.09a
	TC	7.46±0.05a	246.4±14.2a	178.8±2.1ab	88.35±1.32a	21.76±0.08a
	SNM2	7.29±0.20ab	226.6±7.0a	184.0±3.3ab	87.38±0.56a	21.44±0.10bc
	SNM4	7.30±0.13ab	241.7±3.1a	177.7±1.1b	87.94±0.46a	21.27±0.08c
	SNM5	7.30±0.14ab	229.7±10.7a	186.9±4.3a	88.21±0.69a	21.58±0.07ab
F值（F value）		33.61**	11.09**	6.99**	1.60ns	5.48**

年份/季节 Year/Season	处理 Treatment	SPAD值SPAD value			透光率Canopy light transmittance (%)
年份/季节 Year/Season	处理 Treatment	分蘖中期MT	穗分化始期PI	抽穗期HD	穗分化始期PI	抽穗期HD	成熟期MA
2018晚季 Late season of 2018	N0	36.88±0.23b	35.58±0.63c	35.93±0.4c	56.93±4.17a	34.08±1.29a	—
	TC	41.03±0.27a	38.43±0.92b	39.98±0.21b	30.18±2.13bc	12.18±0.70c	—
	RTC	41.13±0.55a	38.40±0.44b	38.70±0.91b	32.53±2.19bc	12.98±0.51bc	—
	SNM1	41.10±0.37a	41.11±0.48a	38.28±0.89b	26.53±1.59c	10.65±1.10c	—
	SNM2	40.73±0.27a	36.58±0.46c	42.38±0.32a	35.85±1.68b	12.00±0.65c	—
	SNM3	40.98±0.23a	37.23±0.5bc	39.98±0.31b	34.83±2.65b	15.68±0.98b	—
F值（F value）		26.27**	9.98**	15.27**	23.99**	123.74**	—
2019早季 Early season of 2019	N0	39.80±0.39c	34.91±0.51c	37.88±0.36b	55.05±1.35a	30.68±3.29a	17.92±0.79a
	FP	41.49±0.41a	40.85±0.89a	38.66±1.04b	25.06±1.33c	10.88±2.14b	7.54±0.77b
	TC	41.32±0.13ab	38.97±1.19ab	41.84±0.43a	34.66±2.17b	9.99±1.06b	7.63±0.59b
	SNM2	40.76±0.38abc	37.92±0.43b	42.60±0.65a	38.82±2.44b	6.99±0.59b	7.46±0.49b
	SNM4	40.23±0.62bc	38.97±0.39ab	42.51±0.66a	41.53±3.54b	6.33±0.69b	6.55±0.54b
	SNM5	40.67±0.36abc	37.08±1.25bc	42.00±0.19a	37.48±1.86b	10.56±1.67b	7.94±0.76b
F值（F value）		2.76ns	4.89**	13.63**	17.46**	25.33**	50.65**

年份/季节 Year/Season	处理 Treatment	叶面积指数Leaf area index			单位面积颖花数 Number of spikelets per unit area (×10⁶ hm^-2)	粒叶比 Grain-leaf ratio (cm^-2)
年份/季节 Year/Season	处理 Treatment	分蘖中期 MT	穗分化始期 PI	抽穗期 HD	单位面积颖花数 Number of spikelets per unit area (×10⁶ hm^-2)	粒叶比 Grain-leaf ratio (cm^-2)
2018晚季 Late season of 2018	N0	0.33±0.02b	1.34±0.03d	1.57±0.05d	300.6±2.08e	1.94±0.21a
	TC	0.65±0.04a	2.79±0.17b	4.66±0.16a	471.2±2.05a	1.02±0.08bc
	RTC	0.61±0.02a	2.43±0.15c	4.07±0.05b	417.0±1.15bc	1.03±0.03bc
	SNM1	0.64±0.04a	3.13±0.10a	4.64±0.25a	415.3±0.72bc	0.90±0.08c
	SNM2	0.62±0.11a	2.35±0.05c	3.97±0.18b	482.3±1.06a	1.23±0.04b
	SNM3	0.65±0.09a	2.30±0.04c	3.40±0.14c	366.8±0.50d	1.09±0.06bc
F值（F value）		3.33*	34.29**	51.55**	25.13**	14.38**
2019早季 Early season of 2019	N0	0.33±0.03b	1.39±0.09d	2.10±0.12b	288.0±1.95c	1.37±0.03a
	FP	0.37±0.01ab	2.87±0.11a	4.22±0.47a	381.3±1.75b	0.93±0.07c
	TC	0.38±0.03ab	2.39±0.09b	3.86±0.11a	439.8±2.19a	1.15±0.08b
	SNM2	0.38±0.02ab	2.08±0.07c	4.53±0.38a	416.4±0.86ab	0.94±0.08c
	SNM4	0.38±0.02ab	2.05±0.04c	4.34±0.13a	429.3±0.30a	1.00±0.03bc
	SNM5	0.44±0.05a	2.18±0.08bc	3.78±0.19a	428.2±1.48a	1.14±0.06b
F值（F value）		1.24ns	28.47**	8.77**	15.85**	6.86**

年份/季节 Year/Season	处理 Treatment	氮肥吸收利用率 RE (%)	氮肥农学利用率 AE (kg·kg^-1)	氮肥生理利用率 PE (kg·kg^-1)	氮肥偏生产力 PFP_N(kg·kg^-1)	氮素收获指数 NHI (%)
2018晚季 Late season of 2018	TC	38.63±3.11a	20.29±0.97ab	53.23±3.48b	45.01±0.97b	72.55±0.67ab
	RTC	31.46±2.27b	18.16±0.72bc	58.49±4.29ab	45.62±0.72b	73.76±0.76a
	SNM1	26.49±1.33b	17.95±0.87bc	67.98±2.97a	45.40±0.87b	70.28±0.46b
	SNM2	43.48±2.44a	21.41±1.42a	49.93±5.07b	48.87±1.42a	72.78±1.58ab
	SNM3	28.16±1.17b	17.31±0.93c	62.05±5.24ab	44.77±0.93b	73.33±0.13a
F值（F value）		9.95**	3.49*	2.63ns	3.22ns	2.22ns
2019早季 Early season of 2019	FP	20.62±4.56b	11.95±1.52b	67.12±14.06a	38.34±1.52b	68.78±2.30a
	TC	33.98±4.74a	18.19±0.30a	56.93±8.41a	49.85±0.30a	68.47±1.63a
	SNM2	32.32±4.76a	17.52±1.48a	56.68±6.55a	52.71±1.48a	69.37±0.75a
	SNM4	33.65±0.72a	17.73±0.90a	52.88±3.64a	49.40±0.89a	71.38±1.78a
	SNM5	27.04±3.97ab	17.89±1.02a	70.76±11.76a	53.08±1.02a	70.79±1.28a
F值（F value）		2.47ns	4.48*	0.62ns	23.17**	0.56ns

Effects of Simplified Nitrogen Managements on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Double-Cropping Rice in South China

RichHTML

PDF