Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (19): 3807-3814.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.19.017

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Tildipirosin Solution in Pigs

YAN ChaoQun1, LI JianYe1, ZHANG Shen1, XIE Shun1, HU Lang1, GU Xin2, CAO Ying2HUANG ShiXin2, HUANG XianHui1   

  1. 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation/College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642; 2 Shanghai Animal Disease Control Center, Shanghai 201103
  • Received:2018-01-24 Online:2018-10-01 Published:2018-10-01

Abstract: 【Objective】The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties and bioavailability of tildipirosin in pigs after an intravenous or intramuscular administration of 4 mg·kg-1 body weight. 【Method】 Twenty healthy pigs were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups and received 4 mg·kg-1of tildipirosin injection by either intravenous or intramuscular administration. The blood was collected at 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, 4 d, 5 d, 6 d, 7 d, 8 d, 9 d, 10 d, 11 d, 12 d, 13 d, 14 d and 15 d after administration. Phenomenex Luna C18 (150 mm×2 mm, 5 μm) was used. Acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid aqueous solution was used as the mobile phase. The gradient elution procedure was used. The flow rate was 0.25 mL·min-1, the column temperature was 30, and the injection volume was 5.0 μL. The sample was thawed naturally, 0.5 mL of plasma was accurately pipetted into a 5 mL centrifuge tube, 2 mL of acetonitrile was added, vortexed and shaken for 10 min, centrifuged at 8000 r/min for 10 min. And then the supernatant was dried with nitrogen at 35 and reconstituted in 1 mL of solution. 0.22 μm microporous membrane, LC-MS/MS detection analysis. Tildipirosin showed a good linearity in the concentration range of 4-1000 ng·mL-1, with a correlation coefficient of 0.994-0.998, a detection limit of 2 ng·mL-1, and a limit of quantification of 4 ng·mL-1. The relative recovery rate of this method was 87.91%-104.93%, which showed a good linear relationship with the correlation coefficient of 0.994—0.998. The coefficient of intra-assay coefficient of variation was 2.12%—12.09%, and the inter-assay coefficient of variation was 3.92%—10.65%. The experimental method had high sensitivity and simple operation, and could be used for the pharmacokinetic study of tildipirosin in pigs. MS conditions of detection method: ESI ion source, positive ion scan, ion spray voltage: 5500V, TEM: 550, the pressure of CUR: 25 psi, the pressure of GS2 50L/min, the pressure of collision CAD: 6 psi. the quantitative ion is: tildipirosin m/z→735.1/98.0. Blood samples were collected and detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using the WinNonlin5.2.1 software package and SPSS 16.0 analysis of the time and concentration data.【Result】After intravenous injection, AUClast and AUCinf (pred) were (18030.30 ±7560.75) h·ng·mL-1 and (18795.31±7455.23) h·ng·mL-1, respectively;t1/2 was (99.42±22.25) h, and MRT was (81.71±12.15) h. After intramuscular injection, Cmax was (886.00±155.63) ng·mL-1; Tmax was (0.51 ± 0.30) h. AUClast and AUCinf (pred) were (19702.05±6442.36) h·ng·mL-1 and (20840.08±6849.76) h·ng·mL-1, respectively; t1/2 was (100.83±20.23) h and MRT was (81.80±9.44) h; the absolute bioavailability was 109.27%. 【Conclusion】 After intramuscular injection, the tildipirosin was absorbed quickly in pigs, distributed widely, peaked rapidly, and eliminated slowly.

Key words: tildipirosin, pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, pig

[1]    STARK K D C. Epidemiological investigation of the influence of environmental risk factors on respiratory diseases in swine: A literature review. Veterinary Journal, 2000, 159(1): 37-56.
[2]    OPRIESSNIG T, GIMENEZ-LIROLA L G, HALBUR P G. Polymicrobial respiratory disease in pigs. Animal Health Research Reviews, 2011, 12(2): 133-148.
[3]    AHMAD T A, RAMMAH S S, SHEWEITA S A, HAROUN M, EI-SAYED L H. Development of immunization trials against Pasteurella multocida. Vaccine, 2014, 32(8): 909-917.
[4]    GOTTSCHALK M. The challenge of detecting herds sub-clinically infected with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Veterinary Journal , 2015, 206 (1): 30-38.
[5]    MACEDO N, ROVIRA A, TORREMORELL M. Haemophilus parasuis: infection, immunity and enrofloxacin. Veterinary Research, 2015, 46(1): 1-6.
[6]    PENG Z, WANG H, LIANG W, CHEN Y, TANG X, CHEN H C, WU B. A capsule/lipopolysaccharide/MLST genotype D/L6/ST11 of Pasteurella multocida is likely to be strongly associated with swine respiratory disease in China. Archives of Microbiology, 2018, 200(1): 107-118.
[7]    SCHLUENZEN F, ZARIVACH R, HARMS J, BASHAN A, TOCILJ A, ALBRECHT R, YONATH A, FRANCESCHI F. Structural basis for the interaction of antibiotics with the peptidyl transferase centre in eubacteria. Nature (London), 2001, 413(6858): 814-821.
[8]    LEES P C D A. Drug selection and optimization of dosage schedules to minimize antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria of Animal Origin. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2006: 49-60.
[9]    LEI Z, LIU Q, YANG B. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis. Oncotarget, 2018, 9(2): 1673-1690.
[10]   FITTIPALDI N, KLOPFENSTEIN C, GOTTSCHALK M, BROES A, PARADIS M A, DICK C P. Assessment of the efficacy of tilmicosin phosphate to eliminate Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae from carrier pigs. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Veterinaire, 2005, 69(2): 146-150.
[11]   ROSE M, MENGE M, BOHLAND C, ZSCHIESCHE E, WILHELM C, KILP S, METZ W, ALLAN M, RÖPKE R, NÜRNBERGER M. Pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin in porcine plasma, lung tissue, and bronchial fluid and effects of test conditions onin vitro activity against reference strains and field isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2013, 36(2): 140-153.
[12]   Fda. RE: NADA 141-334, Zuprevo ™ (tildipirosi. n) promotional labeling and advertisements[Z]. 2014.
[13]   WATTS J L, SWEENEY M T. Antimicrobial resistance in bovine respiratory disease pathogens: Measures, trends, and impact on efficacy. Veterinary Clinics of North America-Food Animal Practice, 2010, 26(1): 79.
[14]   PYÖRÄLÄ S, BAPTISTE K E, CATRY B. Macrolides and lincosamides in cattle and pigs: Use and development of antimicrobial resistance. The Veterinary Journal, 2014, 200(2): 230-239.
[15]   GAUTIERBOUCHARDON A V, FERRÉ S, LE G D. Overall decrease in the susceptibility of mycoplasma bovis to antimicrobials over the past 30 years in france. PLoS ONE, 2014, 8: 1-9.
[16]   OLSEN A S, WARRASS R, DOUTHWAITE S. Macrolide resistance conferred by rRNA mutations in field isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2015, 70 (2): 420.
[17]   DIESTE-PÉREZ L, FRAILE L, DE MIGUEL M J, BARBERÁN M, BLASCO J M. Studies on a suitable antibiotic therapy for treating swine brucellosis. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2015, 38: 357-364.
[18]   BARTRAM D J, MOYAERT H, VANIMISETTI B H. Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin and tildipirosin for the treatment of experimental Mycoplasma bovis infection in calves. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 2016, 2(3): 170-178.
[19]   Ema. European public MRL assessment report (EMA/CVMP/709377/ 2009)[Z]. 2010.
[20]   Ema. European public MRL assessment report (EMA/CVMP/684147/ 2011)[Z]. 2014.
[21]   Ema. Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use(EMA/ CVMP/709377/2009)[Z]. 2010.
[22]   廖远军. 泰地罗新注射液在猪体内的药代动力学研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2015.
LIAO Y J. Studies on pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin injection in pigs [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[23]   WANG J, ZHAO T, SUN X, CAO X. Pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin in beagle dogs. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2018, 41(1): e49-e52.
[24]   MENGE M, ROSE M, BOHLAND C, ZSCHIESCHE E, KILP S, METZ W, ALLAN M, RÖPKE R, NÜRNBERGER M. Pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin in bovine plasma, lung tissue, and bronchial fluid (from live, nonanesthetized cattle). Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2012, 35(6): 550-559.
[25]   ANADON A, REEVE-JOHNSON L. Macrolide antibiotics, drug interactions and microsomal enzymes: Implications for veterinary medicine. Research in Veterinary Science, 1999, 66(3): 197-203.
[26]   NIGHTINGALE C H. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of newer macrolides. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1997, 16(4): 438-443.
[27]   COX S R, MCLAUGHLIN C, FIELDER A E. Rapid and prolonged distribution of tulathromycin into lung homogenate and pulmonary epithelial lining fluid of holstein calves following a single subcutaneous administration of 2. 5 mg/kg body weight. International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine, 2010, 8(3): 129-137.
[28]   GIGUERE S, HUANG R, MALINSKI T J. Disposition of gamithromycin in plasma, pulmonary epithelial lining fluid, bronchoalveolar cells, and lung tissue in cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 2011, 72(3): 326-330.
[29]   VENNER M, PETERS J, HOEHENSTEIGER N. Concentration of the macrolide antibiotic tulathromycin in broncho-alveolar cells is influenced by comedication of rifampicin in foals. Naunyn- Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology, 2010, 381(2): 161-169.
[30]   TORRES F, SANTAMARIA R, JIMENEZ M, MENJÓN R, IBANEZ A. Pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin in pig tonsils. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2016, 39(2): 199-201.
[1] TAN XianMing,ZHANG JiaWei,WANG ZhongLin,CHEN JunXu,YANG Feng,YANG WenYu. Prediction of Maize Yield in Relay Strip Intercropping Under Different Water and Nitrogen Conditions Based on PLS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138.
[2] CHEN XueSen, YIN HuaLin, WANG Nan, ZHANG Min, JIANG ShengHui, XU Juan, MAO ZhiQuan, ZHANG ZongYing, WANG ZhiGang, JIANG ZhaoTao, XU YueHua, LI JianMing. Interpretation of the Case of Bud Sports Selection to Promote the High-Quality and Efficient Development of the World’s Apple and Citrus Industry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 755-768.
[3] LI YaFei, SHI JiangLan, WU TianQi, WANG ShaoXia, LI YuNuo, QU ChunYan, LIU CongHui, NING Peng, TIAN XiaoHong. Effects of Combined Foliar Application of Zinc with Imidacloprid on Zinc Enrichment and Protein Components Content in Wheat Grain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 514-528.
[4] ZHANG XinYao,ZHANG Min,ZHU YuanPeng,HUI XiaoLi,CHAI RuShan,GAO HongJian,LUO LaiChao. Effects of Reduced Phosphorus Application on Crop Yield and Grain Nutritional Quality in the Rice-Wheat Rotation System in Chaohu Lake Basin [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3791-3806.
[5] MingJie XING,XianHong GU,XiaoHong WANG,Yue HAO. Effects of IL-15 Overexpression on Myoblast Differentiation of Porcine Skeletal Muscle Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3652-3663.
[6] YANG ChangPei,WANG NaiXiu,WANG Kai,HUANG ZiQing,LIN HaiLan,ZHANG Li,ZHANG Chen,FENG LuQiu,GAN Ling. Effects and Mechanisms of Exogenous GABA Against Oxidative Stress in Piglets [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3437-3449.
[7] DENG FuLi,SHEN Dan,ZHONG RuQing,ZHANG ShunFen,LI Tao,SUN ShuDong,CHEN Liang,ZHANG HongFu. Non-Starch Polysaccharide Enzymes Cocktail of Corn-Miscellaneous Meal-Based Diet Optimization by In Vitro Method and Its Effects on Intestinal Microbiome in Finishing Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3242-3255.
[8] JIN MengJiao,LIU Bo,WANG KangKang,ZHANG GuangZhong,QIAN WanQiang,WAN FangHao. Light Energy Utilization and Response of Chlorophyll Synthesis Under Different Light Intensities in Mikania micrantha [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2347-2359.
[9] HU RongRong,DING ShiJie,GUO Yun,ZHU HaoZhe,CHEN YiChun,LIU Zheng,DING Xi,TANG ChangBo,ZHOU GuangHong. Effects of Trolox on Proliferation and Differentiation of Pig Muscle Stem Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5290-5301.
[10] TANG ZhenShuang,YIN Dong,YIN LiLin,MA YunLong,XIANG Tao,ZHU MengJin,YU Mei,LIU XiaoLei,LI XinYun,QIU XiaoTian,ZHAO ShuHong. To Evaluate the “Two-Step” Genomic Selection Strategy in Pig by Simulation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4677-4684.
[11] ZHANG DanDan,XU TengTeng,GAO Di,QI Xin,NING Wei,RU ZhenYuan,ZHANG XiangDong,GUO TengLong,SHENTU LuYan,YU Tong,MA YangYang,LI YunSheng,ZHANG YunHai,CAO ZuBing. Transcription Factor TEAD4 Regulates Early Embryonic Development in Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4456-4465.
[12] SHI Jiang,WANG JiaTong,PENG QunHua,LÜ Haipeng,BALDERMANN Susanne,LIN Zhi. Changes in Lipid-Soluble Pigments in Fresh Tea Leaves Treated by Methyl Jasmonate and During Postharvest Oolong Tea Manufacturing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3984-3997.
[13] DU Xing,ZENG Qiang,LIU Lu,LI QiQi,YANG Liu,PAN ZengXiang,LI QiFa. Identification of the Core Promoter of Linc-NORFA and Its Transcriptional Regulation in Erhualian Pig [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3331-3342.
[14] YU ZhengWang,ZHOU ZhongXin. Functions of Antibacterial and Inducing Defense Peptide Expression of Medium-Chain Fatty Acid and Its Application in Piglet Feeds [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2895-2905.
[15] QIN BenYuan,YANG Yang,ZHANG YanWei,LIU Min,ZHANG WanFeng,WANG HaiZhen,WU YiQi,ZHANG XueLian,CAI ChunBo,GAO PengFei,GUO XiaoHong,LI BuGao,CAO GuoQing. Isolation, Culture, Identification and Biological Characteristics of Pig Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1664-1676.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!