Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (19): 3807-3814.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.19.017

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Tildipirosin Solution in Pigs

YAN ChaoQun1, LI JianYe1, ZHANG Shen1, XIE Shun1, HU Lang1, GU Xin2, CAO Ying2HUANG ShiXin2, HUANG XianHui1   

  1. 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation/College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642; 2 Shanghai Animal Disease Control Center, Shanghai 201103
  • Received:2018-01-24 Online:2018-10-01 Published:2018-10-01

Abstract: 【Objective】The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties and bioavailability of tildipirosin in pigs after an intravenous or intramuscular administration of 4 mg·kg-1 body weight. 【Method】 Twenty healthy pigs were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups and received 4 mg·kg-1of tildipirosin injection by either intravenous or intramuscular administration. The blood was collected at 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, 4 d, 5 d, 6 d, 7 d, 8 d, 9 d, 10 d, 11 d, 12 d, 13 d, 14 d and 15 d after administration. Phenomenex Luna C18 (150 mm×2 mm, 5 μm) was used. Acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid aqueous solution was used as the mobile phase. The gradient elution procedure was used. The flow rate was 0.25 mL·min-1, the column temperature was 30, and the injection volume was 5.0 μL. The sample was thawed naturally, 0.5 mL of plasma was accurately pipetted into a 5 mL centrifuge tube, 2 mL of acetonitrile was added, vortexed and shaken for 10 min, centrifuged at 8000 r/min for 10 min. And then the supernatant was dried with nitrogen at 35 and reconstituted in 1 mL of solution. 0.22 μm microporous membrane, LC-MS/MS detection analysis. Tildipirosin showed a good linearity in the concentration range of 4-1000 ng·mL-1, with a correlation coefficient of 0.994-0.998, a detection limit of 2 ng·mL-1, and a limit of quantification of 4 ng·mL-1. The relative recovery rate of this method was 87.91%-104.93%, which showed a good linear relationship with the correlation coefficient of 0.994—0.998. The coefficient of intra-assay coefficient of variation was 2.12%—12.09%, and the inter-assay coefficient of variation was 3.92%—10.65%. The experimental method had high sensitivity and simple operation, and could be used for the pharmacokinetic study of tildipirosin in pigs. MS conditions of detection method: ESI ion source, positive ion scan, ion spray voltage: 5500V, TEM: 550, the pressure of CUR: 25 psi, the pressure of GS2 50L/min, the pressure of collision CAD: 6 psi. the quantitative ion is: tildipirosin m/z→735.1/98.0. Blood samples were collected and detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using the WinNonlin5.2.1 software package and SPSS 16.0 analysis of the time and concentration data.【Result】After intravenous injection, AUClast and AUCinf (pred) were (18030.30 ±7560.75) h·ng·mL-1 and (18795.31±7455.23) h·ng·mL-1, respectively;t1/2 was (99.42±22.25) h, and MRT was (81.71±12.15) h. After intramuscular injection, Cmax was (886.00±155.63) ng·mL-1; Tmax was (0.51 ± 0.30) h. AUClast and AUCinf (pred) were (19702.05±6442.36) h·ng·mL-1 and (20840.08±6849.76) h·ng·mL-1, respectively; t1/2 was (100.83±20.23) h and MRT was (81.80±9.44) h; the absolute bioavailability was 109.27%. 【Conclusion】 After intramuscular injection, the tildipirosin was absorbed quickly in pigs, distributed widely, peaked rapidly, and eliminated slowly.

Key words: tildipirosin, pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, pig

[1]    STARK K D C. Epidemiological investigation of the influence of environmental risk factors on respiratory diseases in swine: A literature review. Veterinary Journal, 2000, 159(1): 37-56.
[2]    OPRIESSNIG T, GIMENEZ-LIROLA L G, HALBUR P G. Polymicrobial respiratory disease in pigs. Animal Health Research Reviews, 2011, 12(2): 133-148.
[3]    AHMAD T A, RAMMAH S S, SHEWEITA S A, HAROUN M, EI-SAYED L H. Development of immunization trials against Pasteurella multocida. Vaccine, 2014, 32(8): 909-917.
[4]    GOTTSCHALK M. The challenge of detecting herds sub-clinically infected with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Veterinary Journal , 2015, 206 (1): 30-38.
[5]    MACEDO N, ROVIRA A, TORREMORELL M. Haemophilus parasuis: infection, immunity and enrofloxacin. Veterinary Research, 2015, 46(1): 1-6.
[6]    PENG Z, WANG H, LIANG W, CHEN Y, TANG X, CHEN H C, WU B. A capsule/lipopolysaccharide/MLST genotype D/L6/ST11 of Pasteurella multocida is likely to be strongly associated with swine respiratory disease in China. Archives of Microbiology, 2018, 200(1): 107-118.
[7]    SCHLUENZEN F, ZARIVACH R, HARMS J, BASHAN A, TOCILJ A, ALBRECHT R, YONATH A, FRANCESCHI F. Structural basis for the interaction of antibiotics with the peptidyl transferase centre in eubacteria. Nature (London), 2001, 413(6858): 814-821.
[8]    LEES P C D A. Drug selection and optimization of dosage schedules to minimize antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria of Animal Origin. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2006: 49-60.
[9]    LEI Z, LIU Q, YANG B. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin against Haemophilus parasuis. Oncotarget, 2018, 9(2): 1673-1690.
[10]   FITTIPALDI N, KLOPFENSTEIN C, GOTTSCHALK M, BROES A, PARADIS M A, DICK C P. Assessment of the efficacy of tilmicosin phosphate to eliminate Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae from carrier pigs. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Veterinaire, 2005, 69(2): 146-150.
[11]   ROSE M, MENGE M, BOHLAND C, ZSCHIESCHE E, WILHELM C, KILP S, METZ W, ALLAN M, RÖPKE R, NÜRNBERGER M. Pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin in porcine plasma, lung tissue, and bronchial fluid and effects of test conditions onin vitro activity against reference strains and field isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2013, 36(2): 140-153.
[12]   Fda. RE: NADA 141-334, Zuprevo ™ (tildipirosi. n) promotional labeling and advertisements[Z]. 2014.
[13]   WATTS J L, SWEENEY M T. Antimicrobial resistance in bovine respiratory disease pathogens: Measures, trends, and impact on efficacy. Veterinary Clinics of North America-Food Animal Practice, 2010, 26(1): 79.
[14]   PYÖRÄLÄ S, BAPTISTE K E, CATRY B. Macrolides and lincosamides in cattle and pigs: Use and development of antimicrobial resistance. The Veterinary Journal, 2014, 200(2): 230-239.
[15]   GAUTIERBOUCHARDON A V, FERRÉ S, LE G D. Overall decrease in the susceptibility of mycoplasma bovis to antimicrobials over the past 30 years in france. PLoS ONE, 2014, 8: 1-9.
[16]   OLSEN A S, WARRASS R, DOUTHWAITE S. Macrolide resistance conferred by rRNA mutations in field isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2015, 70 (2): 420.
[17]   DIESTE-PÉREZ L, FRAILE L, DE MIGUEL M J, BARBERÁN M, BLASCO J M. Studies on a suitable antibiotic therapy for treating swine brucellosis. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2015, 38: 357-364.
[18]   BARTRAM D J, MOYAERT H, VANIMISETTI B H. Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin and tildipirosin for the treatment of experimental Mycoplasma bovis infection in calves. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 2016, 2(3): 170-178.
[19]   Ema. European public MRL assessment report (EMA/CVMP/709377/ 2009)[Z]. 2010.
[20]   Ema. European public MRL assessment report (EMA/CVMP/684147/ 2011)[Z]. 2014.
[21]   Ema. Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use(EMA/ CVMP/709377/2009)[Z]. 2010.
[22]   廖远军. 泰地罗新注射液在猪体内的药代动力学研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2015.
LIAO Y J. Studies on pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin injection in pigs [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[23]   WANG J, ZHAO T, SUN X, CAO X. Pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin in beagle dogs. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2018, 41(1): e49-e52.
[24]   MENGE M, ROSE M, BOHLAND C, ZSCHIESCHE E, KILP S, METZ W, ALLAN M, RÖPKE R, NÜRNBERGER M. Pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin in bovine plasma, lung tissue, and bronchial fluid (from live, nonanesthetized cattle). Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2012, 35(6): 550-559.
[25]   ANADON A, REEVE-JOHNSON L. Macrolide antibiotics, drug interactions and microsomal enzymes: Implications for veterinary medicine. Research in Veterinary Science, 1999, 66(3): 197-203.
[26]   NIGHTINGALE C H. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of newer macrolides. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1997, 16(4): 438-443.
[27]   COX S R, MCLAUGHLIN C, FIELDER A E. Rapid and prolonged distribution of tulathromycin into lung homogenate and pulmonary epithelial lining fluid of holstein calves following a single subcutaneous administration of 2. 5 mg/kg body weight. International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine, 2010, 8(3): 129-137.
[28]   GIGUERE S, HUANG R, MALINSKI T J. Disposition of gamithromycin in plasma, pulmonary epithelial lining fluid, bronchoalveolar cells, and lung tissue in cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 2011, 72(3): 326-330.
[29]   VENNER M, PETERS J, HOEHENSTEIGER N. Concentration of the macrolide antibiotic tulathromycin in broncho-alveolar cells is influenced by comedication of rifampicin in foals. Naunyn- Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology, 2010, 381(2): 161-169.
[30]   TORRES F, SANTAMARIA R, JIMENEZ M, MENJÓN R, IBANEZ A. Pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin in pig tonsils. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2016, 39(2): 199-201.
[1] ZHOU Qi, ZHANG ShiHao, ZHANG Liang, PAN Yu, ZHANG LiJuan, TU Zhi, PAN HongMei, LONG Xi. Prediction of the Potential Habitat Suitability of Luopanshan Pigs in Chongqing Based on the Optimized MaxEnt Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 205-219.
[2] WANG JiYing, LI JingXuan, WANG YanPing, GUO JianFeng, LIN HaiChao, ZHAO XueYan. Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis Reveals Potential Candidate Genes Affecting Fat Deposition in Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1845-1855.
[3] JIN YiDan, HE NiQing, CHENG ZhaoPing, LIN ShaoJun, HUANG FengHuang, BAI KangCheng, ZHANG Tao, WANG WenXiao, YU MinXiang, YANG DeWei. Screening and Identification of Pigm-1 Interaction Proteins for Disease Resistance of Rice Blast [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1043-1051.
[4] LIU Jing, ZHAO ShiLin, YANG XiaoTing, WEI YiXuan, LI JiaPeng, ZHAO Yan. Study on the Origin Traceability of Beijing Black Pig Based on Stable Isotope Technology [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 5071-5080.
[5] GAO Rong, LI HengYu, CHEN LiJuan, MA HuiLing. Physiological Effects of 5-AzaC on Alleviating Salt‑Alkali Stress in Alfalfa and Its Impact on the Expression of DNA Methylation Enzyme Genes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4482-4496.
[6] GAO XiaoPing, PAN HongMei, GUO ZongYi, ZHANG JunJie, LIN Yan, ZHANG Liang. Post-Freezing Quality and Targeted Lipidomics Analysis of Rongchang Pig Spermatozoa with Different Freezing Tolerance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 387-400.
[7] ZHANG HuaPeng, ZHANG QingZe, HE Fan, QI MengFan, FU BinBin, LI QingChun, LI MengXun, MA LiPeng, LIU Yi, HUANG Tao. Cloning and Identification of Differentially Expressed lncRNAs in Follicles of Meishan Pigs and Duroc Pigs with Their Correlation Analysis with miRNAs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1807-1819.
[8] ZHAO ZhenJian, WANG Kai, CHEN Dong, SHEN Qi, YU Yang, CUI ShengDi, WANG JunGe, CHEN ZiYang, YU ShiXin, CHEN JiaMiao, WANG XiangFeng, TANG GuoQing. Integrated Aanalysis of Genome and DNA Methylation for Screening Key Genes Related to Pork Quality Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(7): 1394-1406.
[9] LIU ZhuoLin, LIU HongYun. The Potential and Mechanisms of Apigenin to Relieve Heat Stress and Hypoxia in Dairy Cows Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(5): 1010-1022.
[10] ZHOU YuanQing, DONG HongMin, ZHU ZhiPing, WANG Yue, LI NanXi. Review on Carbon Footprint Assessment of Pig Farming System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(2): 379-389.
[11] CAI RuiJie, CHU YiXin, SHI XinE, JIN JianJun, YANG GongShe. Dietary Addition of Cordyceps Militaris Can Alleviate Lipopolysaccharide- Induced Liver Damage and Skeletal Muscle Protein Degradation in Early Weaning Piglets [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(12): 2467-2482.
[12] LIU YanLing, QIU Ao, ZHANG ZiPeng, WANG Xue, DU HeHe, LUO WenXue, WANG GuiJiang, WEI Xia, SHI WenYing, DING XiangDong. The Efficiency of Haplotype-Based Genomic Selection Using Genotyping by Target Sequencing in Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(11): 2243-2253.
[13] CUI DengShuai, XIONG SanYa, ZHENG Hao, LI LongYun, YU NaiBiao, HUANG ZhiYong, XIAO ShiJun, GUO YuanMei. Comparing Methods for Correcting Days to 100 kg of Sows in Licha Black Pig and Its Intercross with Berkshire [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(6): 1177-1188.
[14] AN Yong, QIN ShiZhen, SHI ZhaoGuo, GONG LiYuan, ZHANG Shuai, JI Feng. Influences of Phosphorus Level in Diet of Parent Pigeons on Biochemical Index, Untargeted Metabolomics Profile of Serum, and Gene Expression of Phosphate Transporters in Squabs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(23): 4772-4788.
[15] LIU Chang, CUI ZiXu, ZUO Zhou, YUN HongMei, NIU Jin, YANG Yang, GUO XiaoHong, LI BuGao, GAO PengFei, ZHAO Yan, CAO GuoQing. Effects of Dietary Fiber Level on Intestinal Barrier Function, Colonic Microbiota and Metabolites in Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(22): 4532-4551.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!