Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (24): 4747-4758.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.24.008

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Effects of Soil Water Content on N2O Emissions and Isotopic Signature of Nitrification and Denitrification

ZHENG Qian1, DING JunJun1, LI YuZhong1,2, LIN Wei1, XU ChunYing1, LI QiaoZhen1, MAO LiLi1   

  1. 1Institue of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Dryland Farming Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081; 2Environmental Stable Isotope Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2017-06-06 Online:2017-12-16 Published:2017-12-16

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of this paper is to understand the contribution of microbial processes to N2O production and its changing rules under different water contents to provide a theoretical basis for reducing agricultural N2O emissions. 【Method】A microcosm experiment was performed to investigate the effects of different water-filled pore space on N2O emissions and isotopic signatures (δ15Nbulk, δ18O and nitrogen isotopomer site preference of N2O) of soil at Shunyi district, Beijing. The study combined stable isotope technique and gas inhibitor method to analyze N2O flux and its isotope signatures that emitted from soil. The experiment was set up three different water content levels, including 67%, 80% and 95% WFPS, and with three inhibitor levels, (without C2H2, with 0.1% (V/V) C2H2 and with 10% (V/V) C2H2). After two hours incubation, the soil samples were collected to determine the concentrations of NH+ 4-N and NO- 3-N. The gas samples were collected to determine the isotope signatures, and the two end-members mixing model was applied to quantify the respective contributions of microbial processes to N2O production. 【Result】According to the incubation of the soil, the weighted average N2O flux of 95%, 80% and 67% WFPS were 1.17, 0.27 and 0.08 mgN·kg-1·d-1, respectively, and the N2O emissions of 95% WFPS were significantly higher than that of both 80% and 67% WFPS, as well as the N2O emissions of 80% WFPS were significantly higher than that of 67% WFPS. The cumulative emissions of (N2O+N2) in 95%, 80% and 67% WFPS were 18.05%, 5.27%, and 1.24% of initial mineral nitrogen, respectively, over the entire incubation period. The cumulative emissions of (N2O+N2) were 19.61, 5.72 and 1.35 mgN·kg-1, respectively; the initial content of NH+ 4-N+NO- 3-N was 108.62 mgN·kg-1. Compared with 67% WFPS, the cumulative (N2O+N2) emissions of 95% and 80% WFPS increased 13.53 and 3.24 times, respectively. The cumulative emissions of (N2O+N2) in 95% WFPS was 2.43 times greater than that of 80% WFPS. The values of reduced NH+ 4-N+NO- 3-N as gaseous nitrogen increased with the increase of the water content. The weighted average δ15Nbulk values varied from -42.93‰ to -4.07‰, and the higher level of soil water content showed significantly higher N2O emissions. 10% (V/V) C2H2 would inhibit the reduction of N2O to N2. The δ18O values with 10% (V/V) C2H2 were significantly smaller than that of with 0.1% (V/V) C2H2 in three water content levels. And the ratio of N2O/(N2O+N2) reduced with the increase of soil moisture. Multiple N2O processes occurred simultaneously in all treatments. The values of SP increased during the initial four days and then decreased gradually with incubation time. The SP values of 67%WFPS treatment at the first two days ranged from 6.74‰ to 12.04‰, and the contribution of denitrification to N2O production was from 56.36% to 66.15%, suggesting that denitrification was the dominant microbial process, then the contribution of nitrification (55.78%-100%) to N2O production became greater. The weighted average SP value was 10.26‰ in 80% WFPS treatment, indicating denitrification (40.90%-74.04%) was the major N2O production process. There were larger SP values in 95% WFPS treatment with 10% (V/V) C2H2 in the first seven incubation days, ranged from 7.61‰ to 21.11‰. Compared with 0.1% (V/V) C2H2, the weighted average SP values of N2O under 95%, 80% and 67% WFPS treatments with 10% (V/V) C2H2 produced from soil reduced by 0.10, 0.33 and 0.06 times respectively.【Conclusion】 The increase of soil water content promotes N2O emission, and the 95% WFPS treatment showed the highest N2O emissions. In the 67% WFPS treatment, the initial stage of N2O emission was dominated by denitrification, followed by nitrification. Denitrification was the dominate process in 80% WFPS treatment and nitrification was the dominate process in 95% WFPS treatment.

Key words: water-filled pore space (WFPS), N2O, nitrification, denitrification, stable isotope, site preference value (SP value)

[1]    IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report. IPCC, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA,2013.
[2]    KROEZE C, MOSIER A, BOUWMAN L. Closing the global N2O budget: A retrospective analysis 1500–1994. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1999, 13(1): 1-8.
[3]    SAHRAWAT K L, KEENEY D R. Nitrous oxide emission from soils. Advances in Soil Science, 1986, 4:103-148.
[4]    BOUWMAN A F. Soils and the greenhouse effect: the present status and future trends concerning the effect of soils and their cover on the fluxes of greenhouse gasses, the surface energy balance, and the water balance. Wiley, 1990.
[5]    GRANLI T, BØCKMAN O C. Nitrous oxide from agriculture. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1994(12):1-128.
[6]    DAVIDSON E A. Fluxes of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide from terrestrial ecosystems. A global inventory of nitric oxide emissions from soils.//ROGERS J E, WHITMAN W B. Microbial Production and Consumption of Greenhouse Gases: Methane, Nitrogen Ooxides, and Halomethanes. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1991: 219- 235.
[7]    STEVENS R J, LAUGHLIN R J, BURNS L C, ARAH J R M, HOOD R C. Measuring the contributions of nitrification and denitrification to the flux of nitrous oxide from soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1997, 29(2): 139-151.
[8]    郑循华, 王明星, 王跃思, 沈壬兴, 龚宴邦, 骆冬梅, 张文, 金继生, 李老土. 稻麦轮作生态系统中土壤湿度对N2O产生与排放的影响. 应用生态学报, 1996, 7(3): 273-279.
ZHENG X H, WANG M X, WANG Y S, SHEN R X, GONG Y B, LUO D M, ZHANG W, JIN J S, LI L T. The effect of soil moisture on n2o production and emission in rice-wheat rotation system. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 7(3): 273-279. (in Chinese)
[9]    ABBASI M K, ADAMS W A. Estimation of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in grassland soil associated with urea-N using 15N and nitrification inhibitors. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2000, 31(1): 38-44.
[10]   WOLF I, RUSSOW R. Different pathways of formation of N2O, N2 and NO in black earth soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2000, 32(2): 229-239.
[11]     BATEMAN E J, BAGGS E M. Contributions of nitrification and denitrification to N2O emissions from soils at different water-filled pore space. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2005, 41(6): 379-388.
[12]     RUSER R, FLESSA H, RUSSOW R, SCHMIDT G, BUEGGER F, MUNCH J C. Emission of N2O, N2 and CO2 from soil fertilized with nitrate: effect of compaction, soil moisture and rewetting. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006, 38(2): 263-274.
[13]   NÖMMIK H. Investigations on denitrification in soil. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 1956, 6(2): 195-228.
[14]   WALTER H M, KEENEY D R, FILLERY I R. Inhibition of Nitrification by Acetylene1. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1979, 43(1): 195-196.
[15]   DE BOER W, KOWALCHUK G A. Nitrification in acid soils: Microorganisms and mechanisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2001, 33 (7/8): 853-866.
[16]     FLATHER D H, BEAUCHAMP E G. Inhibition of the fermentation process in soil by acetylene. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1992, 24(9): 905-911.
[17]   BERNOT M J, DODDS W K, GARDNER W S, MCCARTHY M J, SOBOLEV D, TANK J. Comparing denitrification estimates for a texas estuary by using acetylene inhibition and membrane inlet mass spectrometry. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003, 69(10): 5950-5956.
[18]   YAO Z S, LIU C Y, DONG H B, WANG R, ZHENG X H. Annual nitric and nitrous oxide fluxes from Chinese subtropical plastic greenhouse and conventional vegetable cultivations. Environmental Pollution, 2015, 196: 89-97.
[19]   SCHMIDT H L, WERNER R A, YOSHIDA N, WELL R. Is the isotopic composition of nitrous oxide an indicator for its origin from nitrification or denitrification? A theoretical approach from referred data and microbiological and enzyme kinetic aspects. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2004, 18(18): 2036-2040.
[20]   STEIN L Y, YUNG Y L. Production, isotopic composition, and atmospheric fate of biologically produced nitrous oxide. Annual Review of Earth & Planetary Sciences, 2003, 31(31): 329-356.
[21]   TOYODA S. Production mechanism and global budget of N. Geophysical Research Letters, 2002, 29(3):1037.
[22]   POPP B N, WESTLEY M B, TOYODA S, MIWA T, DORE J E, YOSHIDA N, RUST T M, SANSONE F J, RUSS M E, DSTROM N E, OSTROM P H. Nitrogen and oxygen isotopomeric constraints on the origins and sea-to-air flux of N2O in the oligotrophic subtropical North Pacific gyre. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2002, 16(4): 12-1–12-10.
[23]   YOSHIDA N, TOYODA S. Constraining the atmospheric N2O budget from intramolecular site preference in N2O isotopomers. Nature, 2000, 405(6784): 330-334.
[24]     SUTKA R L, OSTROM N E, OSTROM P H, GANDHI H, BREZNAK J A. Nitrogen isotopomer site preference of N2O produced by Nitrosomonas europaea and Methylococcus capsulatus Bath. Rapid Communications in Mass spectrometry, 2003, 17(7): 738-745.
[25]   TOYODA S, MUTOBE H, YAMAGISHI H, YOSHIDA N, TANJI Y. Fractionation of N2O isotopomers during production by denitrifier. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2005, 37(8):1535-1545.
[26]   SUTKA R L, OSTROM N E, OSTROM P H, LI F. Distinguishing Nitrous Oxide Production from Nitrification and Denitrification on the Basis of Isotopomer Abundances. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2006, 72(1): 638-644.
[27]   SUTKA R L, ADAMS G C, OSTROM N E, OSTROM P H. Isotopologue fractionation during N2O production by fungal denitrification. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2008, 22(24): 3989-3996.
[28]   BAGGS E M. A review of stable isotope techniques for N2O source partitioning in soils: recent progress, remaining challenges and future considerations. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2008, 22(11): 1664-1672.
[29]   STEIN L Y, YUNG Y L. Production, isotopic composition, and atmospheric fate of biologically produced nitrous oxide. Annual Review of Earth & Planetary Sciences, 2003, 31(31): 329-356.
[30]     TOYODA S. Production mechanism and global budget of N. Geophysical Research Letters, 2002, 29(3): 1037.
[31]   POPP B N, WESTLEY M B, TOYODA S, MIWA T, DORE J E, YOSHIDA N, RUST T M, SANSONE F J, RUSS M E, DSTROM N E, OSTROM P H. Nitrogen and oxygen isotopomeric constraints on the origins and sea-to-air flux of N2O in the oligotrophic subtropical North Pacific gyre. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2002, 16(4): 12-1–12-10.
[32]   YOSHIDA N, TOYODA S. Constraining the atmospheric N2O budget from intramolecular site preference in N2O isotopomers. Nature, 2000, 405(6784):330-334.
[33]   鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
BAO S D. Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[34]   PARK S, PÉREZ T, BOERING K A, TRUMBORE S E, GIL J, MARQUINA S, TYLER S C. Can N2O stable isotopes and isotopomers be useful tools to characterize sources and microbial pathways of N2O production and consumption in tropical soils? Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2011, 25(1): 575-582.
[35]     PÉREZ T, TRUMBORE S E, TYLER S C, MATSON P A, ORTIZ-MONASTERIO I, RAHN T, GRIFFITH D W T. Identifying the agricultural imprint on the global N2O budget using stable isotopes. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2001, 106(D9): 9869-9878.
[36]   UEDA S, GO C S, SUWA Y. Stable isotope ?ngerprint of N2O produced by ammonium oxidation under laboratory and ?eld conditions//Internationa Workshop on the Atmospheric N2O Budget: An Analysis of the State of Our Understanding of Sources and Sink s of Atmospheric N2O. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Agro-Environmental Sciences, 1999: 3-20.
[37]   WESTLEY M B, YAMAGISHI H, POPP B N, YOSHIDA N. Nitrous oxide cycling in the Black Sea inferred from stable isotope and isotopomer distributions. Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2006, 53(17/19):1802-1816.
[38]   DECOCK C, SIX J. How reliable is the intramolecular distribution of 15N in N2O to source partition N2O emitted from soil?. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2013, 65: 114-127.
[39]     OSTROM N E, OSTROM P H. The Isotopomers of Nitrous Oxide: Analytical Considerations and Application to Resolution of Microbial Production Pathways. Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 453-476.
[40]     MAEDA K, SPOR A, EDEL-HERMANN V, HERAUD C, BREUIL M, BIZOUARD F, TOYODA S, YOSHIDA N, STEINBERG C, PHILIPPOT L. N2O production, a widespread trait in fungi. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5.
[41]   DOBBIE K E, SMITH K A. The effects of temperature, water-filled pore space and land use on N2O emissions from an imperfectly drained gleysol. European Journal of Soil Science, 2001, 52(4): 667-673.
[42]   DOBBIE K E, MCTAGGART I P, SMITH K A. Nitrous oxide emissions from intensive agricultural systems: Variations between crops and seasons, key driving variables, and mean emission factors. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1999, 104(D21): 26891-26899.
[43]   ABBASI M K, ADAMS W A. Gaseous N emission during simultaneous nitrification-denitrification associated with mineral N fertilization to a grassland soil under field conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2000, 32(8):1251-1259.
[44]   SKIBA U, BALL B. The effect of soil texture and soil drainage on emissions of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide. Soil Use and Management, 2002, 18(1): 56-60.
[45]   CLAYTON H, MCTAGGART I P, PARKER J, SWAN L, SMITH K A. Nitrous oxide emissions from fertilised grassland: a 2-year study of the effects of N fertiliser form and environmental conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1997, 25(3): 252-260.
[46]   SMITH K A. A model of the extent of anaerobic zones in aggregated soils, and its potential application to estimates of denitrification. European Journal of Soil Science, 1980, 31(2): 263-277.
[47]   黄国宏, 陈冠雄, 韩冰, Oswald Van Cleemput. 土壤含水量与N2O产生途径研究. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(1): 53-56.
HUANG G H, CHEN G X, HAN B, OSWALD V C. Study on soil water content and N2O pathway. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999, 10(1): 53-56. (in Chinese)
[48]   SCHINDLBACHER A, ZECHMEISTER‐BOLTENSTERN S, BUTTERBACH‐BAHL K. Effects of soil moisture and temperature on NO, NO2, and N2O emissions from European forest soils. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2004, 109(109): 1739-1739.
[49]   SMITH K A, THOMSON P E, CLAYTON H, MCTAGGART I P, CONEN F. Effects of temperature, water content and nitrogen fertilisation on emissions of nitrous oxide by soils. Atmospheric Environment, 1998, 32(19): 3301-3309.
[50]   FOCHT D D, VERSTRAETE W. Biochemical ecology of nitrification and denitrification in soils. Advances in Microbial Ecology, 1977 (16): 135-214.
[51]   JONES C M, SPOR A, BRENNAN F P, BREUIL M, BRU D, LEMANCEAU P, GRIFFITHS B, HALLIN S, PHILIPPOT L. Recently identified microbial guild mediates soil N2O sink capacity. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4(9): 801-805.
[52]     PÉREZ T. Factors that control the isotopic composition of N2O from soil emissions. Stable Isotopes and Biosphere Atmosphere Interactions, 2005: 69-84.
[53] WELL R, FLESSA H, XING L, TANG X J, RÖMHELD V. Isotopologue ratios of N2O emitted from microcosms with NH+ 4 fertilized arable soils under conditions favoring nitrification. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40(9): 2416-2426.
[54]     KOOL D M, WRAGE N, OENEMA O, DOLFING J, VAN GROENIGEN J W. Oxygen exchange between (de)nitrification intermediates and H2O and its implications for source determination of NO- 3 and N2O: a review. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2007, 21(22): 3569-3578.
[55]   CASCIOTTI K L, SIGMAN D M, HASTINGS M G. Measurement of the oxygen isotopic composition of nitrate in seawater and freshwater using the denitrifier method. Analytical Chemistry, 2002, 74(19): 4905-4912.
[56]   WELL R, FLESSA H. Isotopologue signatures of N2O produced by denitrification in soils. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2009, 114, G02020.
[57]   SZUKICS U, ABELL G C J, HÖDL V, MITTER B, SESSITSCH A, HACKL E, ZECHMEISTER-BOLTENSTERN S. Nitrifiers and denitrifiers respond rapidly to changed moisture and increasing temperature in a pristine forest soil. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 2010, 72(3): 395-406.
[58]     OSTROM, N. E., PITT A, SUTKA R, OSTROM P H, STUART GRANDY A, HUIZINGA K M, PHILIP ROBERTSON G. Isotopologue effects during N2O reduction in soils and in pure cultures of denitrifiers. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2007, 112: G02005. doi:10.1029/2006JG000287, 2007.
[59]   SMITH M S. Dissimilatory reduction of NO- 2 to NH+ 4 and N2O by a soil Citrobacter sp. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1982, 43(4): 854-860.
[60]   ROBERTSON G P, TIEDJE J M. Nitrous oxide sources in aerobic soils: nitrification, denitrification and other biological processes. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1987, 19(2): 187-193.
[61]   SPOTT O, STANGE C F. A new mathematical approach for calculating the contribution of anammox, denitrification and atmosphere to an N2 mixture based on a 15N tracer technique. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2007, 21(14): 2398-2406.
[1] WANG ShuHui,TAO Wen,LIANG Shuo,ZHANG XuBo,SUN Nan,XU MingGang. The Spatial Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration and N2O Emission with Long-Term Manure Fertilization Scenarios from Dry Land in North China Plain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1159-1171.
[2] ZOU WenXin, SU WeiHua, CHEN YuanXue, CHEN XinPing, LANG Ming. Effects of Long-Term Nitrogen Application on Ammonia Oxidizer Communities for Nitrification in Acid Purple Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 529-542.
[3] LI JiaYan,SUN LiangJie,MA Nan,WANG Feng,WANG JingKuan. Carbon and Nitrogen Fixation Characteristics of Maize Root and Straw Residues in Brown Soil Under High and Low Fertility [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4664-4677.
[4] ZHANG XueLin,HE TangQing,ZHANG ChenXi,TIAN MingHui,LI XiaoLi,WU Mei,ZHOU YaNan,HAO XiaoFeng. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Soil N2O Emissions During Maize Growth Periods [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(10): 2000-2012.
[5] LiYuan ZHANG,JinDong LÜ,XinYue SHI,Na YU,HongTao ZOU,YuLing ZHANG,YuLong ZHANG. Effects of Irrigation Regimes on N2O and NO Emissions from Greenhouse Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(5): 992-1002.
[6] LEI HaoJie,LI GuiChun,KE HuaDong,WEI Lai,DING WuHan,XU Chi,LI Hu. Analysis of Impacts and Regulation Differences on Soil N2O Emissions from Two Typical Crop Systems Under Drip Irrigation and Fertilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 768-779.
[7] WANG Qian,LI Zheng,ZHAO ShanShan,QIE MengJie,ZHANG JiuKai,WANG MingLin,GUO Jun,ZHAO Yan. Application of Stable Isotope Technology in the Origin Traceability of Sheep [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(2): 392-399.
[8] YAO FanYun,LIU ZhiMing,CAO YuJun,LÜ YanJie,WEI WenWen,WU XingHong,WANG YongJun,XIE RuiZhi. Diurnal Variation of N2O and CO2 Emissions in Spring Maize Fields in Northeast China Under Different Nitrogen Fertilizers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(17): 3680-3690.
[9] LI Na,SUN ZhanXiang,ZHANG YanQing,LIU EnKe,LI FengMing,LI ChunQian,LI Fei. Contribution of Carbon Sources in Sedimentary Soils Combining Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope with Stable Isotope Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(14): 3057-3064.
[10] Shan ZHUANG,Wei LIN,JunJun DING,Qian ZHENG,XinYue KOU,QiaoZhen LI,YuZhong LI. Effects of Different Root Exudates on Soil N2O Emissions and Isotopic Signature [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(9): 1860-1873.
[11] WU Lei,HE ZhiLong,TANG ShuiRong,WU Xian,ZHANG WenJu,HU RongGui. Greenhouse Gas Emission During the Initial Years After Rice Paddy Conversion to Vegetable Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(24): 5050-5062.
[12] LI YongHua,WU XuePing,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Benefits of Yield, Environment and Economy from Substituting Fertilizer by Manure for Wheat Production of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4879-4890.
[13] XIANG Wei,WANG Lei,LIU TianQi,LI ShiHao,ZHAI ZhongBing,LI ChengFang. Effects of Biochar Plus Inorganic Nitrogen on the Greenhouse Gas and Nitrogen Use Efficiency from Rice Fields [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(22): 4634-4645.
[14] DONG Cheng,CHEN ZhiYong,XIE YingXin,ZHANG YangYang,GOU PeiXin,YANG JiaHeng,MA DongYun,WANG ChenYang,GUO TianCai. Effects of Successive Biochar Addition to Soil on Nitrogen Functional Microorganisms and Nitrous Oxide Emission [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(19): 4024-4034.
[15] JiRong LI,TangWei ZHANG,DeJi CIREN,XiaoJun YANG,Dun CI. Fractionation Effect of Stable Isotopic Ratios in Tsamba Processing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(24): 4592-4602.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!