Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (23): 4469-4479.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.23.001

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Field Identification of Drought Tolerance of LOS5 Transgenic Maize

LIU Cheng1,2, YANG Bing-peng1, SUN Bao-cheng2, ZHANG Jia-chang1, TANG Huai-jun2WANG Tian-yu3, ZHANG Deng-feng3, XIE Xiao-qing2, SHI Yun-su3, SONG Yan-chun3, YANG Xiao-hong1, LI Yu3, LI Jian-sheng1   

  1. 1National Maize Improvement Center, College of agriculture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193
    2Institute of Grain Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091
    3 Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2016-06-06 Online:2016-12-01 Published:2016-12-01

Abstract:

ObjectiveDevelopment of transgenic drought tolerant varieties of maize is an effective way to solve the production problems such as drought disaster and water shortage. The objective of this study was to identify and analyze the effects LOS5 on drought tolerance of maize which were transferred with Arabidopsis thaliana LOS5 gene. And, the transgenic LOS5 maize lines with strongest drought tolerance were screened out for the maize breeding. Method Under the gradient stress of 150, 225, 300, 375, 450 and 600 mm (CK) irrigation amount, the yield and drought tolerance of eight LOS5 transgenic maize lines and their receptor Zheng58 were identified in field. Yield components and other agronomic traits were measured and compared for determining what were the characters most correlated with the enhanced drought tolerance. The transgenic maize lines with significant drought tolerance were screened out for the transgenic breeding application.ResultThe yields and drought tolerances of all 9 maize lines decreased gradually with the decreasing of irrigation amount from 600 to 150 mm. The yields of 8 transgenic maize lines were all significantly higher than that of the receptor Zheng58 in the stress range of 225 mm to 450 mm, and the maximum difference was in the half irrigation (300 mm) of the normal irrigation (600 mm). In the irrigation amount of 300 mm, the drought resistant coefficients of 8 transgenic lines were 0.56 to 0.70, which were significantly higher than that of the receptor Zheng58(0.5), and the drought tolerance then increased by 12% to 40%. The materials in descending order of the drought resistant coefficient were T8920B6, T8920B2, T8920B7, T8920B5, T8920B1, T8920B4, T89B3, B8920B8 and the receptor Zheng58. In the respect of vegetative development, only the leaf color SPAD value of transgenic lines (38.4 to 42.4) were significantly higher than that of the receptor Zheng58 (28.7 to 37.5) in the irrigation of 150 to 225 mm, but the biomass above the ground, plant height and ear site height had no significance among the 9 maize lines. In the development of ear, the ear weight and the ear length of 8 transgenic lines were 42.3 to 61.6 g and 10.9 to 13.1 cm, which were significantly higher than 36.4 to 40.7 g and 8.5 to 11.8 cm of the receptor, respectively, in the irrigation treatments of 150 to 225 mm, but the cob weight and ear diameter were not with significance among the transgenic lines and their receptor. In the grain development, the grain numbers per ear and the grain number per row of the 8 transgenic lines were 86.6 to 182.6 and 8.4 to 15.6, which were significantly higher than 57.3 to 83.2 and 4.9 to 7.1 of the receptor, respectively, but no significant difference was found among the 8 transgenic maize lines and their receptor in the respect of grain rows per ear and 100-grains weight.ConclusionLOS5 had little effect on the vegetable growth of transgenic maize before flowering, but it played a positive role in maintaining of ear length, grain number per row and leaf color of late-filling stage after flowering. And, the ear weight, grain number per ear and yield of transgenic maize were therefore maintained at higher levels when stressed. Drought tolerance of LOS5 transgenic lines was enhanced with different degrees, so field identification and screening is necessary. Stress with a half of normal irrigation can maximize the difference of maize drought tolerance, and was satisfactory for the identification and screening.

Key words: maize, LOS5, drought tolerance, transgenes

[1]    黎裕, 王建康, 邱丽娟, 马有志, 李新海, 万建民. 中国作物分子育种性状与发展前景. 作物学报, 2010, 36(9): 1425-1430.
Li Y, Wang J K, Qiu L J, Ma Y Z, Li X H, Wan J M. The traits and development prospect of crop molecular breeding in China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(9): 1425-1430. (in Chinese)
[2]    Wang C R, Yang A F, Yue G D, Gao Q, Yin H Y, Zhang J R. Enhanced expression of phospholipase C1 (ZmPLC) improves drought tolerance in transgenic maize. Planta, 2008, 227: 1127-1140.
[3]    Liu X, Zhai S, Zhao Y, Sun B, Liu C, Yang A, Zhang J. Overexpression of the phosphatidylinositol synthase gene (ZmPIS) conferring drought stress tolerance by altering membrane lipid composition and increasing ABA synthesis in maize. Plant Cell and Environment, 2013, 36: 1037-1055.
[4]    He C M, He Y, Liu Q, Liu T, Liu C, Wang L, Zhang J. co-expression of genes ApGSMT2 and ApDMT2 for glycine betaine synthesis in maize enhances the drought tolerance of plant. Molecular Breeding, 2013, 31: 559-573.
[5]    Quan R D, Shang M, Zhang H, Zhao Y, Zhang J. Engineering of enhanced glycine betaine synthesis improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2004, 2: 477-486.
[6]    Wei A Y, He C M, Li B, Li N, Zhang J R. The pyramid of transgenes TsVp and BetA effectively enhances the drought tolerance of maize plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2011, 9: 216-229.
[7]    Li B, Wei A, Song C, Li N, Zhang J. Heterologous expression of the TsVP gene improves the drought resistance of maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2008, 6: 146-159.
[8]    Lightfoot D A, Mungur R, Ameziane R, Nolte S, Long L, Bernhard K, Colter A, Jones K, Iqbal M J, Varsa E, Young B. Improved drought tolerance of transgenic Zea mays plants that express the glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) of E. coli. Euphotic, 2007, 156: 103-116.
[9]    Shou H X, Bordallo P, Wang K. Expression of the Nicotiana protein kinase (NPK1) enhanced drought tolerance in transgenic maize. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004, 55: 1013-1019.
[10]   Zhang S J, Li N, Gao F, Yang A, Zhang J. Over-expression of TsCBF1 gene confers improved drought tolerance n transgenic maize. Molecular Breeding, 2010, 26: 455-465.
[11]   Nelson D E, Repetti P P, Adams T R, Creelman R A, Wu  J, Warner D C, Anstrom D C, Bensen R J, Castiglioni P P, Donnarummo M G, Hinchey B S, Kumimoto R    W, Maszle D R, Canales R D, Krolikowski K A, Dotson S B, Gutterson N, Ratcliffe O J, Heard J E. Plant nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) B subunits confer drought tolerance and lead to improved corn yields on water-limited acres. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 2007, 104: 16450-16455.
[12]   Virlouvet L, Jacquemot M P, Gerentes D, Corti H, Bouton S, Gilard F, Valot B, Trouverie J, Tcherkez G, Falque M, Damerval C, Rogowsky P, Perez P, Noctor G, Zivy M, Coursol S. The ZmASR1 protein influences branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis and maintains kenel yield in maize under water-limited conditions. Plant Physiology, 2011, 157: 917-936.
[13]   Castiglioni P, Warner D, Bensen R J, Anstrom D C, Harrison J, Stoecker M, Abad M, Kumar G, Salvador S, D’Ordine R, Navarro S, Back S, Fernandes M, Targolli J, Dasgupta S, Bonin C, Luethy M H, Heard J E. Bacterial RNA chaperones confer abiotic stress tolerance in plants and improved grain yield in maize under water-limited conditions. Plant Physiology, 2008, 147: 446-455.
[14]   Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene expression and signal transduction in water-stress response. Plant Physiology, 1997, 115: 327-334.
[15]   Xiong L, Ishitani M, Lee H, Zhu J K. The Arabidopsis LOS5/ABA3 locus encodes a molybdenum cofactor sulfurase and modulates cold stress- and osmotic stress-responsive gene expression. The Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 2063-2083.
[16]   Xiao B Z, Chen X, Ceng B, Tang N, Zhang Q F, Xiong L Z. Evaluation of seven function-known candidate genes for their effects on improving drought resistance of transgenic rice under field conditions (Special Issue: Abiotic stress tolerance: from gene discovery in model organisms to crop improvement). Molecular Plant, 2009, 2(1): 73-83.
[17]   Yue Y S, Zhang M C, Zhang J C, Tian X L, Duan L S, Li Z H. Overexpression of the AtLOS5 gene increased abscisic acid level and drought tolerance in transgenic cotton. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63: 3741-3748.
[18]   Li Y J, Zhang J C, Zhang J, Hao L, Hua J P, Duan L S, Zhang M C, Li Z H. Expression of an Arabidopsis molybdenum factor sulphurase gene in soybean enhances drought tolerance and increases yield under field conditions. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2013, 11: 747-758.
[19]   Yue Y S, Zhang M C, Zhang J C, Duan L S, Li Z H. Arabidopsis LOS5/ABA3 overexpression in transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi-nc) results in enhanced drought tolerance. Plant Science, 2011, 181: 405-411.
[20]   Gao S, Yuan L, Zhai H, Liu C L, He S Z, Liu Q C. Transgenic sweet potato plants expressing an LOS5 gene are tolerant to salt stress. Plant Cell Tissue & Organ Culture, 2011, 107(2): 205-213.
[21]   Liu L, Duan L, Zhang J, Mi G, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Ren H. Arabidopsis LOS5 gene enhances chilling and salt stress tolerance in cucumber. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12: 825-834.
[22]   Zhang J, Yu H, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li M, Zhang J, Duan L, Zhang M, Li Z. Increased abscisic acid levels in transgenic maize overexpressing At LOS5 mediated root ion fluxes and leaf water status under salt stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016, 67: 1339-1355.
[23]   Lu U Y, Li Y J, Zhang J C, Xiao Y T, Yue Y S, Duan L S, Zhang M Z, Li Z H. Overexpression of Arabidopsis molybdenum cofactor sulfurase gene confers drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Plos One, 2013, 8(1): 39 ref.
[24]   杨启良, 孙英杰, 齐亚峰, 刘艳伟, 王成武, 刘小刚, 戈振扬. 不同水量交替灌溉对小桐子生长调控与水分利用的影响. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(18): 121-126.
Yang Q L, Sun Y J, Qi Y F, Liu Y W, Wang C W, Liu X G, Ge Z Y. Effect on growth regulation and water use efficiency of Jatropha Curcas by different water alternate irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Engineeing, 2012, 28(18): 121-126. (in Chinese)
[25]   孙宝成, 刘成, 王天宇, 黎裕, 张登峰, 李亮, 唐怀君, 石云素, 宋燕春. 转基因玉米株高、ASI和穗部性状与抗旱性的关系研究. 新疆农业科学, 2012, 49: 1961-1965.
Sun B C, Liu C, Wang T Y, Li Y, Zhang D F, Li L, Tang H J, Shi Y S, Song Y C. Studies on the relationship between plant height, ASI, ear traits and drought resistance of transgenic maize. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 49: 1961-1965. (in Chinese)
[26]   黎裕, 王天宇, 刘成, 石云素, 宋燕春. 玉米抗旱品种的筛选指标研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2004, 5: 210-215.
Li Y, Wang T Y, Liu C, Shi Y S, Song Y C. Analysis of criteria for screening drought tolerant maize hybrids. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2004, 5: 210-215. (in Chinese)
[27]   艾天成, 李方敏, 周治安, 张敏, 吴海荣. 作物叶片叶绿素含量与SPAD值相关性研究. 湖北农学院学报, 2000, 20(1): 6-8.
Ai T C, Li F M, Zhou Z A, Zhang M, Wu H R. Correlation study on chlorophyll content and SPAD value of crop leaves. Journal of Hubei College of Agriculture, 2000, 20(1): 6-8. (in Chinese)
[28]   JOSE L R, DAVID A, RAMIRE Z, WENDY Y, PHILIPPE M, ROBERTO Q. Leaf greenness as a drought tolerance related trait in potato (Solanum tuber sum L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2015, 10: 27-35.
[29]   HIDETOSHI A, BENJAMIN K S, HAEFELE M S, KHAMDOK S, KOKI H, YOSHIYUKI K, YOSHIO I, TAT-SUHIKO S, TAKESHI H. Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos, 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research, 2009, 111: 81-84.
[30]   RAHIMI A, MADAH H S, POORYOOSEF M, FATATEH I. Variation of leaf water potential, relative water content and SPAD under gradual drought stress and stress recovery in two medicinal species of Plant ago ovata and P. psyllium. Plant Ecophysiology, 2010(2): 53-60.
[31]   陈春梅, 高聚林, 苏治军, 于晓芳, 胡树平, 赵晓亮. 玉米自交系吐丝期叶片光合参数与其耐旱性的关系. 作物学报, 2014, 40(9): 1667-1676.
CHEN C M, GAO J L, SU Z J, YU X F, HU S P, ZHAO X L. Relationship between leaf photosynthetic parameters and drought resistance at silking stage in maize inbred lines. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(9): 1667-1676. (in Chinese)
[1] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[2] CHAI HaiYan,JIA Jiao,BAI Xue,MENG LingMin,ZHANG Wei,JIN Rong,WU HongBin,SU QianFu. Identification of Pathogenic Fusarium spp. Causing Maize Ear Rot and Susceptibility of Some Strains to Fungicides in Jilin Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 64-78.
[3] LI ZhouShuai,DONG Yuan,LI Ting,FENG ZhiQian,DUAN YingXin,YANG MingXian,XU ShuTu,ZHANG XingHua,XUE JiQuan. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Yield and Combining Ability Based on Maize Hybrid Population [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1695-1709.
[4] XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[5] LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[6] MA XiaoYan,YANG Yu,HUANG DongLin,WANG ZhaoHui,GAO YaJun,LI YongGang,LÜ Hui. Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[7] LI Qian,QIN YuBo,YIN CaiXia,KONG LiLi,WANG Meng,HOU YunPeng,SUN Bo,ZHAO YinKai,XU Chen,LIU ZhiQuan. Effect of Drip Fertigation Mode on Maize Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[8] ZHANG JiaHua,YANG HengShan,ZHANG YuQin,LI CongFeng,ZHANG RuiFu,TAI JiCheng,ZHOU YangChen. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Modes on Starch Accumulation and Activities of Starch Synthesis-Related Enzyme of Spring Maize Grain in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1332-1345.
[9] TAN XianMing,ZHANG JiaWei,WANG ZhongLin,CHEN JunXu,YANG Feng,YANG WenYu. Prediction of Maize Yield in Relay Strip Intercropping Under Different Water and Nitrogen Conditions Based on PLS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138.
[10] LIU Miao,LIU PengZhao,SHI ZuJiao,WANG XiaoLi,WANG Rui,LI Jun. Critical Nitrogen Dilution Curve and Nitrogen Nutrition Diagnosis of Summer Maize Under Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 932-947.
[11] QIAO Yuan,YANG Huan,LUO JinLin,WANG SiXian,LIANG LanYue,CHEN XinPing,ZHANG WuShuai. Inputs and Ecological Environment Risks Assessment of Maize Production in Northwest China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 962-976.
[12] HUANG ZhaoFu, LI LuLu, HOU LiangYu, GAO Shang, MING Bo, XIE RuiZhi, HOU Peng, WANG KeRu, XUE Jun, LI ShaoKun. Accumulated Temperature Requirement for Field Stalk Dehydration After Maize Physiological Maturity in Different Planting Regions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 680-691.
[13] FANG MengYing,LU Lin,WANG QingYan,DONG XueRui,YAN Peng,DONG ZhiQiang. Effects of Ethylene-Chlormequat-Potassium on Root Morphological Construction and Yield of Summer Maize with Different Nitrogen Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4808-4822.
[14] DU WenTing,LEI XiaoXiao,LU HuiYu,WANG YunFeng,XU JiaXing,LUO CaiXia,ZHANG ShuLan. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application Rate on the Yields of Three Major Cereals in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4863-4878.
[15] YI YingJie,HAN Kun,ZHAO Bin,LIU GuoLi,LIN DianXu,CHEN GuoQiang,REN Hao,ZHANG JiWang,REN BaiZhao,LIU Peng. The Comparison of Ammonia Volatilization Loss in Winter Wheat- Summer Maize Rotation System with Long-Term Different Fertilization Measures [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4600-4613.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!