Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (21): 4179-4191.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.21.012

• HORTICULTURE·STORAGE·FRESH-KEEPING·PROCESSING • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Furrow Irrigation Pattern and Irrigation Amount on Comprehensive Quality and Yield of Greenhouse Tomato

LI Hong-zheng, CAO Hong-xia, GUO Li-jie, WU Xuan-yi   

  1. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Area of Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi
  • Received:2016-04-19 Online:2016-11-01 Published:2016-11-01

RichHTML

2

PDF

800

Cited

3

Abstract: 【Objective】This study aims at exploring the effects of different furrow irrigation patterns and irrigation amounts on the comprehensive quality, yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) and comprehensive benefit of greenhouse tomato, optimizing the furrow irrigation pattern and irrigation amount of greenhouse tomato in northwest China, so as to provide a scientific basis for sustainable development of greenhouse tomato in the region. 【Method】Common furrow irrigation (CFI) and alternative furrow irrigation (AFI) were set as two furrow irrigation patterns. Based on the cumulative evaporation from a 20 cm diameter pan between two irrigations (E), 0.6E, 0.8E, 1.0E, 1.2E were set as four different levels of irrigation amount. The quality of tomato was evaluated comprehensively by principal component analysis (PCA) and grey correlation analysis (GCA). Principal components scores and grey weighted correlation degrees were regarded as the comprehensive quality of tomato. Weight values of comprehensive quality, yield and IWUE were calculated by the coefficient of variation method. Then, TOPSIS method was used to evaluate the comprehensive benefits of all irrigation treatments. 【Result】Tomato quality was affected by both furrow irrigation pattern and irrigation amount. The evaluation results of PCA and GCA were not completely consistent. However, both PCA and GCA acquired that tomato quality under AFI-0.6E and AFI-0.8E treatments were the best. Yield of AFI-0.6E treatment decreased by 22.56% while it just decreased by 9.42% under AFI-0.8E treatment compared to AFI-1.2E treatment which acquired the most yield. While, the IWUE of AFI-0.6E and AFI-0.8E had no significant difference. The result of TOPSIS showed that AFI-0.8E treatment had the largest comprehensive benefit. 【Conclusion】 AFI coupling with the irrigation amount of 0.8E could improve the quality of tomato and guarantee the yield and IWUE, consequently generate the largest comprehensive benefit. It was the optimal combination of furrow irrigation pattern and irrigation amount.

Key words: greenhouse tomato, furrow irrigation pattern, irrigation amount, comprehensive quality evaluation, yield, IWUE

[1]    李俊, 李建明, 曹凯, 赵志华, 张大龙, 徐菲, 杜宏斌, 蒋学琴. 西北地区设施农业研究现状及存在的问题. 中国蔬菜, 2013(6): 24-29.
Li J, Li J M, Cao K, Zhao Z H, Zhang D L, Xu F, Du H B, Jiang X Q. Present status and existing problems of studies on protected agriculture in northwest China. China Vegetables, 2013(6): 24-29. (in Chinese)
[2]    李会合. 蔬菜品质的研究进展. 北方园艺, 2006(04): 55-56.
Li H H. Research progress of vegetable quality. Northern Horticulture, 2006(04): 55-56. (in Chinese)
[3]    Choudhary O P, Ghuman B S, Dhaliwal M S, Chawla N. Yield and quality of two tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivars as influenced by drip and furrow irrigation using waters having high residual sodium carbonate. Irrigation Science, 2010, 28(6): 513-523.
[4]    Wang F, Kang S Z, Du T S, Li F S, Qiu R J. Determination of comprehensive quality index for tomato and its response to different irrigation treatments. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98(8): 1228-1238.
[5]    王峰, 杜太生, 邱让建, 董平国. 亏缺灌溉对温室番茄产量与水分利用效率的影响. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(9): 46-52.
WANG F, DU T S, QIU R J, DONG P G. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of tomato in solar greenhouse. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(9): 46-52. (in Chinese)
[6]    刘浩, 段爱旺, 孙景生, 宁慧峰, 王峰. 温室番茄节水调质灌水方案评价. 排灌机械工程学报, 2014, 32(6): 529-534.
LIU H, DUAN A W, SUN J S, NING H F, WANG F. Evaluation of irrigation scheme with high quality and efficiency for greenhouse grown tomato. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2014, 32(6): 529-534. (in Chinese)
[7]    汪顺生, 费良军, 高传昌, 孙景生. 不同沟灌方式下夏玉米棵间蒸发试验. 农业机械学报, 2012, 43(9): 66-71.
WANG S S, FEI L J, GAO C C, SUN J S. Soil evaporation of summer maize under different furrow irrigations. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012, 43(9): 66-71. (in Chinese)
[8]    杜太生, 康绍忠, 王振昌, 王峰, 杨秀英, 苏兴礼. 隔沟交替灌溉对棉花生长、产量和水分利用效率的调控效应. 作物学报, 2007, 33(12): 1982-1990.
DU T S, KANG S Z, WANG Z C, WANG F, YANG X Y, SU X L. Responses of cotton growth, yield, and water use efficiency to alternate furrow irrigation. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(12): 1982-1990. (in Chinese)
[9]    王振昌, 杜太生, 杨秀英, 唐青运. 隔沟交替灌溉对棉花耗水、产量和品质的调控效应. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(1): 13-17.
WANG Z C, DU T S, YANG X Y, TANG Q Y. Effects of alternate furrow-irrigation on crop water consumption, yield and quality of cotton. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(1): 13-17. (in Chinese)
[10]   曹琦, 王树忠, 高丽红, 任华中, 陈青云, 赵景文, 王倩, 眭晓蕾, 张振贤. 交替隔沟灌溉对温室黄瓜生长及水分利用效率的影响. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(1): 47-53.
CAO Q, WANG S Z, GAO L H, REN H Z, CHEN Q Y, ZHAO J W, WANG Q, SUI X L, ZHANG Z X. Effects of alternative furrow irrigation on growth and water use efficiency of cucumber in solar greenhouse. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(1): 47-53. (in Chinese)
[11]   范凤翠, 张立峰, 李志宏, 石玉芳, 高丽红, 燕泰翔, 贾建明. 日光温室番茄控制土壤深层渗漏的灌水量指标. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(10): 83-89.
FAN F C, ZHANG L F, LI Z H, SHI Y F, GAO L H, YAN T X, JIA J M. Tomato irrigation index for soil water leakage control in greenhouse. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(10): 83-89. (in Chinese)
[12]   ZENG C Z, BIE Z L, YUAN B Z. Determination of optimum irrigation water amount for drip-irrigated muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) in plastic greenhouse. Agricultural Water Management, 2009, 96(4): 595-602.
[13]   ERTEK A, ?ENSOY S, ?BRAHIM GEDIK, KÜÇÜKYUMUK C. Irrigation scheduling based on pan evaporation values for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown under field conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 81(1/2): 159-172.
[14]   WANG Z Y, LIU Z X, ZHANG Z K, LIU X B. Subsurface drip irrigation scheduling for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in solar greenhouse based on 20cm standard pan evaporation in Northeast China. Scientia Horticulturae, 2009, 123(1): 51-57.
[15]   邢英英, 张富仓, 张燕, 李静, 强生才, 吴立峰. 滴灌施肥水肥耦合对温室番茄产量、品质和水氮利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(4): 713-726.
XING Y Y, ZHANG F C, ZHANG Y, LI J, QIANG S C, WU L F. Effect of irrigation and fertilizer coupling on greenhouse tomato yield, quality, water and nitrogen utilization under fertigation. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(4): 713-726. (in Chinese)
[16]   杨慧, 曹红霞, 李红峥, 郭莉杰, 杜娅丹. 基于空间分析法研究温室番茄优质高产的水氮模式. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(5): 896-905.
YANG H, CAO H X, LI H Z, GUO L J, DU Y D. An investigation on optimal irrigation and nitrogen rates of greenhouse tomato based on spatial analysis for high yield and quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(5): 896-905. (in Chinese)
[17]   张勇刚, 吴键, 项波卡, 程昌合, 夏琛, 解莹莹. 基于改进模糊灰色关联分析法的烤烟化学品质评价. 烟草科技, 2014(10): 83-86.
ZHANG Y G, WU J, XIANG B K, CHENG C H, XIA C, XIE Y Y. Chemical quality evaluation of flue-cured tobacco based on improved fuzzy grey correlation analysis. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2014(10): 83-86. (in Chinese)
[18]   李国栋, 胡建军, 周冀衡, 唐大新. 基于主成分和聚类分析的烤烟化学品质综合评价. 烟草科技, 2008(12): 5-9.
LI G D, HU J J, ZHOU J H, TANG D X. Comprehensive evaluation of flue-cured tobacco chemical quality based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2008(12): 5-9. (in Chinese)
[19]   王峰, 杜太生, 邱让建. 基于品质主成分分析的温室番茄亏缺灌溉制度. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(1): 75-80.
WANG F, DU T S, QIU R J. Deficit irrigation scheduling of greenhouse tomato based on quality principle component analysis. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(1): 75-80. (in Chinese)
[20]   王鹏勃, 李建明, 丁娟娟, 刘国英, 潘铜华, 杜清洁, 常毅博. 水肥耦合对温室袋培番茄品质、产量及水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(2): 314-323.
WANG P B, LI J M, DING J J, LIU G Y, PAN T H, DU Q J, CHANG Y B. Effect of water and fertilizer coupling on quality, yield and water use efficiency of tomato cultivated by organic substrate in bag. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(2): 314-323. (in Chinese)
[21]   李建明, 潘铜华, 王玲慧, 杜清洁, 常毅博, 张大龙, 刘媛. 水肥耦合对番茄光合、产量及水分利用效率的影响. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(10): 82-90.
LI J M, PAN T H, WANG L H, DU Q J, CHANG Y B, ZHANG D L, LIU Y. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on tomato photosynthesis, yield and water use efficiency. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014, 30(10): 82-90. (in Chinese)
[22]   陈贤, 吴兴恩, 杨德, 龚元圣. 主成分权重法在番茄果实商品性综合评价上的应用探讨. 吉林农业科学, 2008, 33(4): 49-52.
CHEN X, WU X E, YANG D, GONG Y S. Discussion on comprehensive evaluation of commercial traits of tomato fruits using the method of weighting of principal component. Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 33(4): 49-52. (in Chinese)
[23]   杨乐琦, 仇淑芳, 唐菲, 黄丹枫, 唐东芹. 基于主成分分析的观赏生菜品质综合评价. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2015, 33(3): 53-60.
YANG L Q, CHOU S F, TANG F, HUANG D F, TANG D Q. Comprehensive evaluation for ornamental lettuce based on principal component analysis. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Agricultural Science Edition), 2015, 33(3): 53-60. (in Chinese)
[24]   姚荣江, 杨劲松, 陈小兵, 余世鹏, 李晓明. 苏北海涂围垦区土壤质量模糊综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(6): 2019-2027.
YAO R J, YANG J S, CHEN X B, YU S P, LI X M. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of soil quality in coastal reclamation region of north Jiangsu Province. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(6): 2019-2027. (in Chinese)
[25]   吕锋. 灰色系统关联度之分辨系数的研究. 系统工程理论与实践, 1997(6): 50-55.
LÜ F. Research on the identification coefficient of relational grade for grey system. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 1997(6): 50-55. (in Chinese)
[26]   李灿, 张凤荣, 朱泰峰, 奉婷, 安萍莉. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(5): 217-227.
LI C, ZHANG F R, ZHU T F, FENG T, AN P L. Evaluation and correlation analysis of land use performance based on entropy-weight TOPSIS method. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013, 29(5): 217-227. (in Chinese)
[27]   王胜阳, 张喜春, 秦勇. 俄罗斯优良番茄品种筛选及品比试验(二). 北方园艺, 2008(1): 4-6.
WANG S Y, ZHANG X C, QIN Y. Selection and comparison of fine tomato varieties from Russian. Northern Horticulture, 2008(1): 4-6. (in Chinese)
[28]   唐晓伟, 刘明池, 郝静, 王文琪. 调亏灌溉对番茄品质与风味组分的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(4): 970-977.
TANG X W, LIU M C, HAO J, WANG W Q. Influences of regulated deficit irrigation on sensory quality and flavor components of tomato. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(4): 970-977. (in Chinese)
[29]   康绍忠, 张建华, 梁宗锁, 胡笑涛, 蔡焕杰. 控制性交替灌溉—一种新的农田节水调控思路. 干旱地区农业研究, 1997, 15(1): 4-9.
KANG S Z, ZHANG J H, LIANG Z S, HU X T, CAI H J. The controlled alternative irrigation—A new approach for water saving regulation in farmland. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 1997, 15(1): 4-9. (in Chinese)
[30]   张雯, 安贵阳, 李翠红. 根系分区交替灌溉对富士苹果光合作用及果实品质的影响. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(6): 33-37.
ZHANG W, AN G Y, LI C H. Effects of alternative partial root-zone irrigation on the photosynthesis and fruit quality in Fuji apple trees. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2010, 25(6): 33-37. (in Chinese)
[31]   YANG L J, QU H , ZHANG Y L, LI F S. Effects of partial root-zone irrigation on physiology, fruit yield and quality and water use efficiency of tomato under different calcium levels. Agricultural Water Management, 2012, 104(1): 89-94.
[32]   杜太生, 康绍忠, 闫博远, 王峰, 李志军. 干旱荒漠绿洲区葡萄根系分区交替灌溉试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(11): 52-58.
DU T S, KANG S Z, YAN B Y, WANG F, LI Z. Experimental research of high-quality efficient irrigation on grape in the oasis region. Transactions of the CSAE, 2007, 23(11): 52-58. (in Chinese)
[33]   刘贤赵, 宿庆, 孙海燕. 根系分区交替灌溉不同交替周期对苹果树生长、产量及品质的影响. 生态学报, 2010, 30(18): 4881-4888.
LIU X Z, SU Q, SUN H Y. Effects of different alternate cycling on the growth，yield and quality of apple trees under conditions of alternate partial root-zone irrigation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(18): 4881-4888. (in Chinese)
[34]   刘小刚, 张彦, 张富仓, 蔡焕杰, 李志军, 杨启良, 杨具瑞. 交替灌溉下不同水氮供给对番茄产量和品质的影响. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(4): 283-287.
LIU X G, ZHANG Y, ZHANG F C, CAI H J, LI Z J, YANG Q L, YANG J R. Effect of water and nitrogen supply on tomato yield and quality under alternative irrigation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 27(4): 283-287. (in Chinese)
[35]   周继莹, 成自勇, 王峰, 姚名泽, 张正红. 覆膜沟灌条件下不同水氮处理对番茄产量与品质的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(4): 43-49.
ZHOU J Y, CHENG Z Y, WANG F, YAO M Z, ZHANG Z H. Effects of water and nitrogen on yield and fruit quality of tomato under furrow irrigation and plastic film mulching cultivation. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(4): 43-49. (in Chinese)
[36]   公丽艳, 孟宪军, 刘乃侨, 毕金峰. 基于主成分与聚类分析的苹果加工品质评价. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(13): 276-285.
GONG L Y, MENG X J, LIU N Q, BI J F. Evaluation of apple quality based on principal component and hierarchical cluster analysis. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014, 30(13): 276-285. (in Chinese)
[37]   李彦平, 李淑君, 吴娟霞, 孟智勇, 郭芳阳. DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在新引烤烟新品种综合评价中的应用比较. 中国烟草学报, 2012, 18(4): 35-40.
LI Y P, LI S J, WU J X, MENG Z Y, GUO F Y. Application of DTOPSIS and grey relational analysis in evaluating newly introduced flue-cured tobacco varieties. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2012, 18(4): 35-40. (in Chinese)
[38]   孙景生, 康绍忠, 蔡焕杰, 胡笑涛. 交替隔沟灌溉提高农田水分利用效率的节水机理. 水利学报, 2002(3): 64-68.
SUN J S, KANG S Z, CAI H J, HU X T. Water saving mechanism for promoting water use efficiency by using alternate furrow irrigation techniques. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002(3): 64-68. (in Chinese)
[1] ZHANG XiaoLi, TAO Wei, GAO GuoQing, CHEN Lei, GUO Hui, ZHANG Hua, TANG MaoYan, LIANG TianFeng. Effects of Direct Seeding Cultivation Method on Growth Stage, Lodging Resistance and Yield Benefit of Double-Cropping Early Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[2] YAN YanGe, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, ZHAO BingQiang, YUAN Liang. Effects of Dextran Modified Urea on Winter Wheat Yield and Fate of Nitrogen Fertilizer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 287-299.
[3] XU JiuKai, YUAN Liang, WEN YanChen, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, LI HaiYan, ZHAO BingQiang. Nitrogen Fertilizer Replacement Value of Livestock Manure in the Winter Wheat Growing Season [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[4] WANG CaiXiang,YUAN WenMin,LIU JuanJuan,XIE XiaoYu,MA Qi,JU JiSheng,CHEN Da,WANG Ning,FENG KeYun,SU JunJi. Comprehensive Evaluation and Breeding Evolution of Early Maturing Upland Cotton Varieties in the Northwest Inland of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 1-16.
[5] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[6] ZHANG KeKun,CHEN KeQin,LI WanPing,QIAO HaoRong,ZHANG JunXia,LIU FengZhi,FANG YuLin,WANG HaiBo. Effects of Irrigation Amount on Berry Development and Aroma Components Accumulation of Shine Muscat Grape in Root-Restricted Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 129-143.
[7] ZHANG Wei,YAN LingLing,FU ZhiQiang,XU Ying,GUO HuiJuan,ZHOU MengYao,LONG Pan. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield of Double Cropping Rice and Utilization Efficiency of Light and Heat Energy in Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 31-45.
[8] XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[9] LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[10] GUO ShiBo,ZHANG FangLiang,ZHANG ZhenTao,ZHOU LiTao,ZHAO Jin,YANG XiaoGuang. The Possible Effects of Global Warming on Cropping Systems in China XIV. Distribution of High-Stable-Yield Zones and Agro-Meteorological Disasters of Soybean in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1763-1780.
[11] WANG HaoLin,MA Yue,LI YongHua,LI Chao,ZHAO MingQin,YUAN AiJing,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui. Optimal Management of Phosphorus Fertilization Based on the Yield and Grain Manganese Concentration of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[12] GUI RunFei,WANG ZaiMan,PAN ShengGang,ZHANG MingHua,TANG XiangRu,MO ZhaoWen. Effects of Nitrogen-Reducing Side Deep Application of Liquid Fertilizer at Tillering Stage on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Fragrant Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[13] LIAO Ping,MENG Yi,WENG WenAn,HUANG Shan,ZENG YongJun,ZHANG HongCheng. Effects of Hybrid Rice on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556.
[14] LI Qian,QIN YuBo,YIN CaiXia,KONG LiLi,WANG Meng,HOU YunPeng,SUN Bo,ZHAO YinKai,XU Chen,LIU ZhiQuan. Effect of Drip Fertigation Mode on Maize Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[15] QIN YuQing,CHENG HongBo,CHAI YuWei,MA JianTao,LI Rui,LI YaWei,CHANG Lei,CHAI ShouXi. Increasing Effects of Wheat Yield Under Mulching Cultivation in Northern of China: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd