Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (12): 2267-2279.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.12.003

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of Root Absorption Characteristics and Nitrogen Utilization of Wheat Genotypes with Different N Efficiency

XIONG Shu-ping1, WU Ke-yuan 1, WANG Xiao-chun1,2, ZHANG Jie1, DU Pan1, WU Yi-xin1, MA Xin-ming1   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University/Collaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops/National Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, Zhengzhou 450002
    2College of Life Sciences, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou 450002
  • Received:2015-12-29 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2016-06-16

Abstract: 【Objective】This study was aimed at clarifying the physiological mechanisms of nitrogen uptake and utilization of wheat, and providing a theoretical basis for breeding and high-efficiency cultivation of wheat genotypes with high nitrogen efficiency, by analyzing the difference in root absorption characteristics and shoot nitrogen utilization of wheat genotypes with different nitrogen efficiencies. 【Method】 In this study, Nitrogen-efficient cultivars Zhoumai 27, Zhengmai 366 and Nitrogen-inefficient cultivars Zhoumai 28, Kaimai 20 were selected from 16 wheat genotypes in yield conditions. The relationship of root and shoot, root dry weight, root physiological activity, and the difference in nitrogen transport and distribution capability of root and shoot were researched under different nitrogen levels.【Result】The result showed that there were no significant differences in root characters of two types of wheat genotypes before jointing stage. After jointing stage, root dry weight, root to shoot ratio, root total absorption area and root active absorption area of Zhoumai 27, Zhengmai 366, and 28 were significantly higher than Kaimai 20. Root vigor of N-efficient genotypes was significantly higher than that of N-inefficient genotypes. The nitrogen accumulation amount at mature and nitrogen absorption amount after anthesis of Zhoumai 27, Zhengmai 366, and 28 were significantly higher than Kaimai 20. The grain yield, plant nitrogen use efficiency, nitrogen physiological efficiency, and nitrogen distribution ratio in grain of N-efficient genotypes Zhoumai 27, Zhengmai 366 were significantly higher than N-inefficient genotypes Zhoumai 28 and Kai Mai 20. The translocation amount to grain of N-efficient genotypes Zhoumai 27, Zhengmai 366 were significantly higher than those of N-inefficient genotypes Zhoumai 28, Kaimai 20, which vegetative organs accumulated nitrogen before anthesis. Compared with conventional nitrogen application rate, reduced supply nitrogen, root dry weight, root total absorption area, root active absorption area, root vigor, nitrogen accumulation amount at mature, nitrogen accumulation translocation to grain, and grain yield of the four wheat genotypes were decreased, when nitrogen application rate was reduced. At the same time, root to shoot ratio, nitrogen uptake efficiency, plant nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen physiological efficiency were increased when nitrogen application rate was reduced, root dry weight of four wheat genotypes, except for Zhoumai 28. At the same time, root total absorption area, root active absorption area, root vigor, nitrogen accumulation amount at mature, nitrogen accumulation translocation to grain, and grain yield of the four wheat genotypes were increased. And the root to shoot ratio, nitrogen uptake efficiency, plant nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen physiological efficiency were decreased.【Conclusion】The higher root biomass, root activity, root total absorption area, and root active absorption area of N-efficient wheat genotypes contributed to its absorption of nitrogen; it was the basis of nitrogen efficiency. The higher Nitrogen translocation, nitrogen grain distribution capacity, and reasonable shoot ratio of N-efficient wheat genotypes promotes its utilization of nitrogen, and it was the key for nitrogen efficiency. Although the N-inefficient wheat cultivar Zhoumai 28 had the strongest nitrogen absorption capacity, it had low transport capacity of nitrogen fertility and excessive shoot ratio after anthesis, which limited rational nitrogen utilization of wheat plant, which was not conducive to the improvement of nitrogen efficiency. The lower nitrogen efficiency of Kaimai 20 was due to its lower nitrogen absorption capacity.

Key words: common wheat, root, nitrogen utilization, nitrogen efficiency  

[1]    Stuart D, Basso B, Marquart-Pyatt S, Reimer A, Robertson G P, Zhao J.The need for a coupled human and natural systems understanding of agricultural nitrogen loss. BioScience, 2015, 65(6): 571-578.
[2]    张丽娟, 马友华, 王桂苓, 孙丽, 朱小红, 汪丽婷. 农业面源污染中农田氮污染危害及其防治措施. 农业环境与发展, 2010, 27(4): 48-52.
Zhang L J, Ma Y H, Wang G L, Sun L, Zhu X H, Wang L T. Nitrogen pollution of agricultural non-point source pollution and its prevention and control measures. Agro-Environment and Development, 2010, 27(4): 48-52. (in Chinese)
[3]    Fageria N K, Baligar V C, Li Y C. The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2008, 31(6): 1121-1157.
[4]    Hirel B, Le Gouis J, Ney B, André G. The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2007, 58(9): 2369-2387.
[5]    Raun W R, Johnson G V. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agronomy Journal, 1999, 91(3): 357-363.
[6]    Foulkes M J, Sylvester-Bradley R, Scott R K. Evidence for differences between winter wheat cultivars in acquisition of    soil mineral nitrogen and uptake and utilization of applied    fertilizer nitrogen. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1998, 130(1): 29-44.
[7]    张国平, 张光恒. 小麦氮素利用效率的基因型差异研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1996, 2(4): 331-336.
Zhang G P, Zhang G H. Study on variation among wheat genotypes in N utilization. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 1996, 2(4): 331-336. (in Chinese)
[8]    Fageria N K, Baligar V C. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advances in agronomy, 2005, 88: 97-185.
[9]    Gurpreet K, Bavita A, Bains N S, Muhammad F. Nitrogen nutrition, its assimilation and remobilization in diverse wheat genotypes. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 2015, 17(3): 531-538.
[10]   王小纯, 王晓航, 熊淑萍, 马新明, 丁世杰, 吴克远, 郭建彪. 不同供氮水平下小麦品种的氮效率差异及其氮代谢特征. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(13): 2569-2579.
Wang X C, Wang X H, Xiong S P, Ma X M, Ding S J, Wu K Y, Guo J B. Differences in nitrogen efficiency and nitrogen metabolism of wheat varieties under different nitrogen levers. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(13): 2569-2579. (in Chinese)
[11]   Foulkes M J, Hawkesford M J, Barraclough P B, Holdsworth M J, Kerr S, Kightley S, Shewry P R. Identifying traits to improve the nitrogen economy of wheat: Recent advances and future prospects. Field Crops Research, 2009, 114(3): 329-342.
[12]   Baligar V C, Fageria N K, He Z L. Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2001, 32(7/8): 921-950.
[13]   Barber S A. Soil nutrient bioavailability: A mechanistic approach: 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995: 180-202.
[14]   Sauerbeck D R, Helal H M. Factors affecting the nutrient efficiency of plants//Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. Dordrecht: Springer, 1990: 11-17.
[15]   孙敏, 郭文善, 朱新开, 封超年, 郭凯泉, 彭永欣. 不同氮效率小麦品种苗期根系的NO3-, NH4+ 吸收动力学特征. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(5): 84-87.
Sun M, Guo W S, Zhu X K, Feng C N, Guo K Q, Peng Y X. Kinntics of nitrate and ammonium uptake by different wheat genotypes at seeding stage. Journal of Triticeac Crops, 2006, 26(5): 84-87. (in Chinese)
[16]   李双双, 李晶, 陈龙涛, 付驰, 顾万荣, 魏湜. 施氮量对春小麦根系生长及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2013, 33(1): 141-145.
Li S S, Li J, Chen L T, Fu C, Gu W Q, Wei S. Effects of   nitrogen application rate on root growth and yield formation of  spring wheat. Journal of Triticeac Crops, 2013, 33(1): 141-145. (in Chinese)
[17]   汪晓丽, 陶玥玥, 盛海君, 封克. 硝态氮供应对小麦根系形态发育和氮吸收动力学的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30(1): 129-134.
Wang X L, Tao Y Y, Sheng H J, Feng K. Effects of nitrate supply on morphology development and nitrate uptake kinetics of wheat roots. Journal of Triticeac Crops, 2010, 30(1): 129-134. (in Chinese)
[18]   孟自力, 陈辉, 朱伟. 施氮量对不同小麦品种根系的影响. 热带农业科学, 2013, 33(10): 27-29.
Meng Z L, Chen H, Zhu W. Effects of nitrogen application rates on root system of different varieties. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2013, 33(10): 27-29. (in Chinese)
[19]   宋欣欣, 贺德先. 小麦生育后期主茎和分蘖次生根对籽粒产量和品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2011, 31(2): 281- 285.
Song X X, He D X. Effect of culm and tiller nodal roots at late growing period on grain yield and quality of wheat. Journal of Triticeac Crops, 2011, 31(2): 281- 285. (in Chinese)
[20]   张耗, 黄钻华, 王静超, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 江苏中籼水稻品种演进过程中根系形态生理性状的变化及其与产量的关系. 作物学报, 2011, 37(6): 1020-1030.
Zhang H, Huang Z H, Wang J C, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Changes in morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with grain yield during the evolution of mid-season indica rice cultivars in Jiangsu Province. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(6): 1020-1030. (in Chinese)
[21]   Moll R H, Kamprath E J, Jackson W A. Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agronomy Journal, 1982, 74(3): 562-564.
[22]   赵满兴, 周建斌, 杨绒, 郑险峰, 翟丙年, 李生秀. 不同施氮量对旱地不同品种冬小麦氮素累积, 运输和分配的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(2): 143-149.
Zhao M X, Zhou J B, Yang R, Zheng X F, Zhai B N, Li S X. Characteristics of nitrogen accumulation, distribution and translocation in winter wheat on dryland. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2006, 12(2): 143-149. (in Chinese)
[23]   李淑文, 文宏达, 周彦珍, 李雁鸣, 肖凯. 不同氮效率小麦品种氮素吸收和物质生产特性. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(10): 1992-2000.
Li S W, Wen H D, Zhou Y Z, Li Y M, Xiao K. Characterization of nitrogen uptake and dry matter production in wheat varieties with different N efficiency. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(10): 1992-2000. (in Chinese)
[24]   韩胜芳, 李淑文, 吴立强, 文宏达, 肖凯. 不同小麦品种氮效率与氮吸收对氮素供应的响应及生理机制. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(4): 807-812.
Han S F, Li S W, Wu L Q, Wen H D, Xiao K. Responses and corresponding physiological mechanisms of different wheat varieties in their nitrogen efficiency and nitrogen uptake to nitrogen supply. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(4): 807-812. (in Chinese)
[25]   王艳哲, 刘秀位, 孙宏勇, 张喜英, 张连蕊. 水氮调控对冬小麦根冠比和水分利用效率的影响研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(3): 282-289.
Wang Y Z, Liu X W, Sun H Y, Zhang X Y, Zhang L R. Effects of water and nitrogen on root/shoot ratio and water use efficiency of winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(3): 282-289. (in Chinese)
[26]   宋海星, 王学立. 玉米根系活力及吸收面积的空间分布变化. 西北农业学报, 2005, 14(1): 137-141.
Song H X, Wang X L. The space distribution of the maize root activity and its absorbing area. Acta Agriculture Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2005, 14(1): 137-141. (in Chinese)
[27]   刘小刚, 张富仓, 杨启良, 李志军. 玉米叶绿素、脯氛酸、根系活力对调亏灌溉和氮肥处理的响应. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(4): 106-111.
Liu X G, Zhang F C, Yang Q L, Li Z J. Response of chlorophyll, proline and root activity of maize to regulated deficit irrigation and N fertilization treatment. Acta Agriculture Boreall-sinica, 2009, 24(4): 106-111. (in Chinese)
[28]   黄亿, 李廷轩, 张锡洲, 戢林, 吴沂珀. 氮高效利用基因型大麦氮素转移及氮形态组分特征. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(6): 1151-1161.
Huang Y, Li T X, Zhang X Z, Ji L, Wu Y P. Characteristics of nitrogen transportation and fractions in different organs of barley genotype with high nitrogen utilization efficiency. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(6): 1151-1161. (in Chinese)
[29]   张庆江, 张立言, 毕桓武. 普通小麦碳氮物质积累分配特征及与籽粒蛋白质的关系. 华北农学报, 1996, 11(3): 57-62.
Zhang Q J, Zhang L Y, Bi H W. Accumulation and distribution of carbohydrate and nitrogen and their relationship to grain protein in wheat. Acta Agriculture Boreall-sinica, 1996, 11(3): 57-62. (in Chinese)
[1] XIAO DeShun, XU ChunMei, WANG DanYing, ZHANG XiuFu, CHEN Song, CHU Guang, LIU YuanHui. Effects of Rhizosphere Oxygen Environment on Phosphorus Uptake of Rice Seedlings and Its Physiological Mechanisms in Hydroponic Condition [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 236-248.
[2] LOU YiBao,KANG HongLiang,WANG WenLong,SHA XiaoYan,FENG LanQian,NIE HuiYing,SHI QianHua. Vertical Distribution of Vegetation Roots and Its Influence on Soil Erosion Resistance of Gully Heads on the Gullied Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 90-103.
[3] TANG HuaPing,CHEN HuangXin,LI Cong,GOU LuLu,TAN Cui,MU Yang,TANG LiWei,LAN XiuJin,WEI YuMing,MA Jian. Unconditional and Conditional QTL Analysis of Wheat Spike Length in Common Wheat Based on 55K SNP Array [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1492-1502.
[4] CHAO ChengSheng,WANG YuQian,SHEN XinJie,DAI Jing,GU ChiMing,LI YinShui,XIE LiHua,HU XiaoJia,QIN Lu,LIAO Xing. Characteristics of Efficient Nitrogen Uptake and Transport of Rapeseed at Seedling Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1172-1188.
[5] WANG MengRui, LIU ShuMei, HOU LiXia, WANG ShiHui, LÜ HongJun, SU XiaoMei. Development of Artificial Inoculation Methodology for Evaluation of Resistance to Fusarium Crown and Root Rot and Screening of Resistance Sources in Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 707-718.
[6] LI Long, LI ChaoNan, MAO XinGuo, WANG JingYi, JING RuiLian. Advances and Perspectives of Approaches to Phenotyping Crop Root System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 425-437.
[7] FANG MengYing,LU Lin,WANG QingYan,DONG XueRui,YAN Peng,DONG ZhiQiang. Effects of Ethylene-Chlormequat-Potassium on Root Morphological Construction and Yield of Summer Maize with Different Nitrogen Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4808-4822.
[8] YAN Qiang,XUE Dong,HU YaQun,ZHOU YanYan,WEI YaWen,YUAN XingXing,CHEN Xin. Identification of the Root-Specific Soybean GmPR1-9 Promoter and Application in Phytophthora Root-Rot Resistance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 3885-3896.
[9] LIU ShuSen,SUN Hua,SHI Jie,GUO Ning,MA HongXia,ZHANG HaiJian. Grading Criterion of Maize Root Rot Based on Aboveground Symptoms and the Relationship Between Severity and Agronomic Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 3939-3947.
[10] ZHOU LiPing,YUAN Liang,ZHAO BingQiang,LI YanTing. Effects of Single-Sided Application of Humic Acid on Maize Root Growth [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 339-349.
[11] CUI QingQing, MENG XianMin, DUAN YunDan, ZHUANG TuanJie, DONG ChunJuan, GAO LiHong, SHANG QingMao. Inhibiting Eeffect of Root-Cutting and Top-Pinching on Graft Healing of Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 365-377.
[12] MA YuFeng,ZHOU ZhongXiong,LI YuTong,GAO XueQin,QIAO YaLi,ZHANG WenBin,XIE JianMing,HU LinLi,YU JiHua. Effects of Nitrogen Level and Form on Root Morphology of Mini Chinese Cabbage and Its Physiological Index [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 378-389.
[13] MA YuQuan,WANG XiaoLong,LI YuMei,WANG XiaoDi,LIU FengZhi,WANG HaiBo. Differences in Nutrient Absorption and Utilization of 87-1 Grape Variety Under Different Rootstock Facilities [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3822-3830.
[14] GAO RenCai,CHEN SongHe,MA HongLiang,MO Piao,LIU WeiWei,XIAO Yun,ZHANG Xue,FAN GaoQiong. Straw Mulching from Autumn Fallow and Reducing Nitrogen Application Improved Grain Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Winter Wheat by Optimizing Root Distribution [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2709-2725.
[15] BAI Fei,BAI GuiPing,WANG ChunYun,LI Zhen,GONG DePing,HUANG Wei,CHENG YuGui,WANG Bo,WANG Jing,XU ZhengHua,KUAI Jie,ZHOU GuangSheng. Effects of Tillage Depth and Shading on Root Growth and Nutrient Utilization of Rapeseed [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2726-2739.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!