Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (20): 3885-3896.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.20.002

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Identification of the Root-Specific Soybean GmPR1-9 Promoter and Application in Phytophthora Root-Rot Resistance

YAN Qiang(),XUE Dong,HU YaQun,ZHOU YanYan,WEI YaWen,YUAN XingXing,CHEN Xin()   

  1. Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement, Nanjing 210014
  • Received:2022-05-05 Accepted:2022-06-27 Online:2022-10-16 Published:2022-10-24
  • Contact: Xin CHEN E-mail:yanqiang@jaas.ac.cn;cx@jaas.ac.cn

RichHTML

64

PDF

217

Abstract:

【Objective】The objective of this study is to identify the root-specific promotors and the core regulatory sequence of soybean. Then evaluate the potential application of the synthetic promoter in Phytophthora root-rot resistance. 【Method】The genes which specifically expressed in roots with high expression levels were screened based on the transcriptome date of soybean root, stem and leaf tissues in the seedling stage. Based on the distribution of the cis elements, the promoter truncation approach was used to map the minimal promoter controlling root specific expression in soybean hairy roots. The obtained minimal promoter fragment was concatenated with the Phytophthora inducible promoter elements p4XD to construct the synthetic promoter. The synthetic promoter driven over-expression of Phytophthora resistance related gene GmNDR1 in soybean hairy roots, then the resistance level of transgenic tissue to Phytophthora and the expression profiles of GmNDR1 during the interaction had been analyzed. Furthermore, the transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana plants were generated to evaluate the resistance at plant level. 【Result】Though screening, six soybean PR1 homologues with significant root specific expression manner were identified, and GmPR1-9 had the highest promoter activity. Numbers of root specific expression related cis elements were identified in promoter sequence using the online tool PLACE. Truncation analysis of the promoter showed that serial 5’ end deletions L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5 had different GUS activities. The L5 (-166 to -1) fragment had 80% activity of the full-length promoter, and was able to drive GUS expression in roots of transgenic N. benthamiana. GUS enzyme activity was almost undetectable in three 3’ end deletions R1, R2 and R3, and the double terminal deletion mutant M1. When the fusion promoter p4XD-L5 driven GmNDR1 expression in soybean hairy roots, the resistance to P. sojae was significantly enhanced. The disease severity and lesion length were significantly reduced in the over-expression hairy roots when compared with control, and the relative biomass of Phytophthora decreased by 66.5% at 48 h post inoculation. GmNDR1 maintained high expression level in over-expression tissues, with 39.2 times of that in control tissues. The expressions were further up-regulated after inoculation, and reached the highest level at 36 h. In p4XD-L5::NDR1 transgenic N. benthamiana plants, the expression of GmNDR1 was significantly higher in roots than that in stems and leaves. Fifteen days after P. capsica inoculation, the plant height, root length and fresh weight of GmNDR1 over-expression plants were significantly higher, and meanwhile the leaf wilting rate and lesion length were significantly lower. 【Conclusion】This study obtained a soybean root specific promoter and identified the core regulation sequence. The strategy which driven the expression of GmNDR1 by the synthetic promoter p4XD-L5 combined the inducible and tissue-specific promoter core elements can significantly enhance the resistance of transgenic soybean hairy roots and Nicotiana benthamiana plants to Phytophthora pathogens.

Key words: soybean (Glycine max), root specific promotor, GmPR1-9, synthetic promoter, Phytophthora root-rot resistance

Fig. 1

The relative expression of GmPR1-9 in different soybean organs A: Heat map representation of GmPR1-9 and homologous expression (log10FPKM); B: GmPR1-9 expression by RT-PCR analysis"

Fig. 2

Diagram of promoters with root specific expression related cis elements"

Fig. 3

Expression activity analysis of truncated pGmPR1-9 promoters in soybean hairy roots A: Schematic diagrams of truncated pGmPR1-9 promoter constructs. L1-M1: Promoter truncation position information; B: GUS histochemical assays in transgenic soybean hairy roots"

Fig. 4

GUS enzyme activity assays of different truncated pGmPR1-9 promoters Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05). The same as below"

Fig. 5

Tissue specific expression analysis of L5 promoter fragment A: Fluorescent screening of transgenic N. benthamiana plants; B-E: Histochemical GUS staining of 10 d old transgenic N. benthamiana whole plants, leaf, stem and root. bar=1 mm"

Fig. 6

Evaluation of Phytophthora resistance in p4XD-L5::NDR1 over-expression soybean hairy roots A: Phenotypes of the soybean hairy roots after P. sojae inoculation; B: Statistics of the lesion length; C: Relative biomass of P. sojae in inoculated hairy roots; D: Relative expression of GmDNR1 in inoculated hairy roots. EV indicates empty vector control. ** indicates significant differences (P<0.01). The same as below"

Fig. 7

The expression levels of GmNDR1 in root, stem and leaf tissues of transgenic N. benthamiana plants"

Fig. 8

Phenotypes of the p4XD-L5::NDR1 over-expression N. benthamiana plants after P. capsici inoculation A-C: Phenotypes of the N. benthamiana plants inoculated with P. capsici zoospores at 0, 5, and 10 dpi; D-E: Stem and root lesion phenotypes of the inoculated N. benthamiana plants at 10 dpi"

Fig. 9

P. capsici resistance of p4XD-L5::NDR1 over-expression N. benthamiana plants A: Plant height; B: Percentage of leaf wilting; C: Lesion length; D: Taproot length; E: Plant fresh weight"

[1] TYLER B M. Phytophthora sojae: Root rot pathogen of soybean and model oomycete. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2007, 8(1): 1-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00373.x pmid: 20507474
[2] 王桂荣, 王源超, 杨光富, 王燕, 周雪平. 农业病虫害绿色防控基础的前沿科学问题. 中国科学基金, 2020, 34(4): 374-380.
WANG G R, WANG Y C, YANG G F, WANG Y, ZHOU X P. Frontiers in scientific issues of controlling agricultural pests and diseases by environmental-friendly methods. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2020, 34(4): 374-380. (in Chinese)
[3] 张杰, 董莎萌, 王伟, 赵建华, 陈学伟, 郭惠珊, 何光存, 何祖华, 康振生, 李毅, 彭友良, 王国梁, 周雪平, 王源超, 周俭民. 植物免疫研究与抗病虫绿色防控: 进展、机遇与挑战. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2019, 49(1): 1479-1507.
ZHANG J, DONG S M, WANG W, ZHAO J H, CHEN X W, GUO H S, HE G C, HE Z H, KANG Z S, LI Y, PENG Y L, WANG G L, ZHOU X P, WANG Y C, ZHOU J M. Plant immunity and sustainable control of pests in China: Advances, opportunities and challenges. Scientia Sinica (Vitae), 2019, 49(1): 1479-1507. (in Chinese)
[4] FFRENCH-CONSTANT R H, BASS C. Does resistance really carry a fitness cost? Current Opinion in Insect Science, 2017, 21: 39-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2017.04.011
[5] GURR S J, RUSHTON P J. Engineering plants with increased disease resistance: How are we going to express it? Trends in Biotechnology, 2005, 23(6): 283-290.
pmid: 15922080
[6] HERNANDEZ-GARCIA C M, FINER J J. Identification and validation of promoters and cis-acting regulatory elements. Plant Science, 2014, 217-218: 109-119.
[7] KUMMARI D, PALAKOLANU S R, KISHOR P B K, BHATNAGAR- MATHUR P, SINGAM P, VADEZ V, SHARMA K K. An update and perspectives on the use of promoters in plant genetic engineering. Journal of Biosciences, 2020, 45(1): 119.
doi: 10.1007/s12038-020-00087-6
[8] LI Y Y, LI C X, CHENG L Z, YU S S, SHEN C J, PAN Y. Over- expression of OsPT2 under a rice root specific promoter Os03g01700. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2019, 136: 52-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.01.009
[9] KASUGA M, MIURA S, SHINOZAKI K, YAMAGUCHI- SHINOZAKI K. A combination of the Arabidopsis DREB1A gene and stress-inducible rd29A promoter improved drought- and low-temperature stress tolerance in tobacco by gene transfer. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2004, 45(3): 346-350.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch037
[10] LILLEY C J, WANG D, ATKINSON H J, URWIN P E. Effective delivery of a nematode-repellent peptide using a root-cap-specific promoter. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2011, 9(2): 151-161.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00542.x pmid: 20602721
[11] HUANG L Y, ZHANG F, QIN Q, WANG W S, ZHANG T, FU B Y. Identification and validation of root-specific promoters in rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(1): 1-10.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60763-2
[12] CHEN L, JIANG B J, WU C X, SUN S, HOU W S, HAN T F. GmPRP2 promoter drives root-preferential expression in transgenic Arabidopsis and soybean hairy roots. BMC Plant Biology, 2014, 14: 245.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0245-z
[13] CHEN L, JIANG B J, WU C X, SUN S, HOU W S, HAN T F. The characterization of GmTIP, a root-specific gene from soybean, and the expression analysis of its promoter. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 2015, 121(2): 259-274.
doi: 10.1007/s11240-014-0682-2
[14] 柴春月. 大豆中疫霉诱导性启动子的克隆与功能研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2013.
CHAI C Y. Identification and functional characterization of the soybean promoters conferring Phytophthora sojae induced expression[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agriculture University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[15] CHEN C J, CHEN H, ZHANG Y, THOMAS H R, FRANK M H, HE Y H, XIA R. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Molecular Plant, 2020, 13(8): 1194-1202.
doi: S1674-2052(20)30187-8 pmid: 32585190
[16] YANG B, YANG S, GUO B, WANG Y, ZHENG W, TIAN M, DAI K, LIU Z, WANG H, MA Z, WANG Y, YE W, DONG S, WANG Y. The Phytophthora effector Avh241 interacts with host NDR1-like proteins to manipulate plant immunity. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2021, 63(7): 1382-1396.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.13082
[17] YAN Q, SI J R, CUI X X, PENG H, JING M F, CHEN X, XING H, DOU D L. GmDAD1, a conserved defender against cell death 1 (DAD1) from soybean, positively regulates plant resistance against Phytophthora pathogens. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019. 10: 107.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00107
[18] HORSCH R B, ROGERS S G, FRALEY R T. Transgenic plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1985, 50: 433-437.
pmid: 3868487
[19] 李濯雪, 陈信波. 植物组织特异性启动子及相关顺式作用元件研究进展. 生物学杂志, 2015, 32(6): 91-95.
LI Z X, CHEN X B. Research advances in plant tissue specific promoters and related cis-acting elements. Journal of Biology, 2015, 32(6): 91-95. (in Chinese)
[20] KOPRIVOVA A, SCHUCK S, JACOBY R P, KLINKHAMMER I, WELTER B, LESON L, MARTYN A, NAUEN J, GRABENHORST N, MANDELKOW J F, ZUCCARO A, ZEIER J, KOPRIVA S. Root-specific camalexin biosynthesis controls the plant growth- promoting effects of multiple bacterial strains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116(31): 15735-15744.
[21] WERNER T, NEHNEVAJOVA E, KOLLMER I, NOVAK O, STRNAD M, KRAMER U, SCHMULLING T. Root-specific reduction of cytokinin causes enhanced root growth, drought tolerance, and leaf mineral enrichment in Arabidopsis and tobacco. The Plant Cell, 2010, 22(12): 3905-3920.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.072694
[22] JEONG H J, JUNG K H. Rice tissue-specific promoters and condition-dependent promoters for effective translational application. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2015, 57(11): 913-924.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.12362
[23] KOEHORST-VAN PUTTEN H J J, WOLTERS A M A, PEREIRA- BERTRAM I M, VAN DEN BERG H H J, VAN DER KROL A R, VISSER R G F. Cloning and characterization of a tuberous root- specific promoter from cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Planta, 2012, 236(6): 1955-1965.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1796-6
[24] LI Y, LIU X Q, CHEN R M, TIAN J, FAN Y L, ZHOU X J. Genome-scale mining of root-preferential genes from maize and characterization of their promoter activity. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19(1): 584.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2198-8 pmid: 31878892
[25] ZHANG Q Q, GUO N N, ZHANG Y H, YU Y B, LIU S Y. Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of Pathogenesis- Related 1 (PR-1) gene family in tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) in response to blister-blight disease stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(3): 1292.
doi: 10.3390/ijms23031292
[26] ALMEIDA-SILVA F, VENANCIO T M. Pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1) genes in soybean: Genome-wide identification, structural analysis and expression profiling under multiple biotic and abiotic stresses. Gene, 2022, 809: 146013.
doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2021.146013
[27] HAN J H, LEE J H, LEE O R. Leaf-specific pathogenesis-related 10 homolog, PgPR-10.3, shows in silico binding affinity with several biologically important molecules. Journal of Ginseng Research, 2015, 39(4): 406-413.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2015.06.002
[28] MYLONA P, MOERMAN M, YANG W C, GLOUDEMANS T, VANDEKERCKHOVE J, VANKAMMEN A, BISSELING T, FRANSSEN H J. The root epidermis-specific pea gene RH2 is homologous to a pathogenesis-related gene. Plant Molecular Biology, 1994, 26(1): 39-50.
pmid: 7948884
[29] MOLINA A, GRLACH J, VOLRATH S, RYALS J. Wheat genes encoding two types of PR-1 proteins are pathogen inducible, but do not respond to activators of systemic acquired resistance. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 1999, 12(1): 53-58.
pmid: 9885193
[30] LEON-KLOOSTERZIEL K M, VERHAGEN B W, KEURENTJES J J, VANPELT J A, REP M, VANLOON L C, PIETERSE C M. Colonization of the Arabidopsis rhizosphere by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. activates a root-specific, ethylene-responsive PR-5 gene in the vascular bundle. Plant Molecular Biology, 2005, 57(5): 731-748.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-3097-y
[31] XU P F, JIANG L Y, WU J J, LI W B, FAN S J, ZHANG S Z. Isolation and characterization of a pathogenesis-related protein 10 gene (GmPR10) with induced expression in soybean (Glycine max) during infection with Phytophthora sojae. Molecular Biology Reports, 2014, 41(8): 4899-4909.
doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3356-6
[32] 崔文文, 迟婧, 冯艳芳, 耿丽丽, 刘荣梅. 人工合成根特异启动子SRSP的功能分析. 生物工程学报, 2020, 36(4): 700-706.
CUI W W, CHI J, FENG Y F, GENG L L, LIU R M. Construction and function of a root-specific promoter SRSP. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, 2020, 36(4): 700-706. (in Chinese)
[33] ZHONG R Q, DEMURA T, YE Z H. SND1, a NAC domain transcription factor, is a key regulator of secondary wall synthesis in fibers of Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2006, 18(11): 3158-3170.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.047399
[34] KO J H, KIM W C, HAN K H. Ectopic expression of MYB46 identifies transcriptional regulatory genes involved in secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 2009, 60(4): 649-665.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03989.x
[35] SONG X G, MENG X B, GUO H Y, CHENG Q, JING Y H, CHEN M J, LIU G F, WANG B, WANG Y H, LI J Y, YU H. Targeting a gene regulatory element enhances rice grain yield by decoupling panicle number and size. Nature Biotechnology, 2022, 40(9): 1403-1411.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01281-7
[36] WHITHAM S A, QI M, INNES R W, MA W, LOPES-CAITAR V, HEWEZI T. Molecular soybean-pathogen interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2016, 54: 443-468.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-100156 pmid: 27359370
[1] YUE Qun-Hua, YUAN Jian-Long, HAO Fei, JIN Mu-Zi, WANG Jing-Yuan, YANG Wen-Liang, LIU Dong-Jun, CANG Ming. Transfected FST Gene into Ovine Muscle-Drived Myogenic Cells to Regulate the Expression of MSTN Gene [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(2): 385-393.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd