Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 324-333.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.02.12

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Hormone Levels and Gene Expression Analysis of Chrysanthemum Cultivar ‘Puma Sunny’ Under Low Light Intensity

HAN Shuang1,2, CHEN Su-mei1, JIANG Jia-fu1, FANG Wei-min1, GUAN Zhi-yong1, CHEN Fa-di1   

  1. 1College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095
    2School of Life Sciences, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu 476000, Henan
  • Received:2014-03-12 Online:2015-01-16 Published:2015-01-16

Abstract: 【Objective】 In the study, ethylene accumulation rate, GA levels, IAA content and correlative gene expression levels in leaves of chrysanthemum under low light condition during shade avoidance symptoms was assayed, to explore the shade tolerant mechanism.【Method】Chrysanthemum ‘Puma Sunny’ was assayed under 55% irradiance (control group) and 15% irradiance (low light treatment). GA and IAA contents on 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 d were measured by high performance liquid chromatograph Agilent 6890N GC system, the relative expression level was measured on 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 d using GAPDH as reference gene. The concentrations of GA3 were set at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mmol·L-1, with a proper the amount of ethanol dissolution, the final concentration ethanol was 1%. The sample was treated on 4 d and 8 d using the above ground spraying. The concentrations of PAC were set at 10, 20, 50 and100 μmol·L-1, with a proper amount of ethanol dissolution, the final concentration of ethanol was 1%. The results showed that 2.0 mmol·L-1 GA3, and 50 μmol·L-1 PAC showed impacts on plant growth significantly. After treatment on 0 d and 7 d, the sample was collected on 14 d for analysis of gene expression.【Result】The ethylene level increased markedly on 2 and 4 d, especially on 4 d, and it was 2.04 times more than that of CK. After 6 d, the ethylene level between CK and treatment was not significant. The plant ethylene generation rate under 15% low light conditions was higher than that of 55% irradiance. The gibberellin content in leaves increased significantly on day 2, 4 and 6 compared with the control, the peak appeared on the 6 d, reached 4700.56 ng·g-1, 2.57 times higher than the control, then decreased quickly, and down to control level on the 8 d. With the prolonging of treatment time, the content of auxin in control group showed an increasing trend, weak light treatment group decreased. On the 8 day, the auxin content in treatment group was 223.95 ng·g-1 FW, and that in the control group was 489.77 ng·g-1 FW. The IAA content of the control groupment was 1.12 times higher than that of the treatment group. In the second day of weak light treatment, the expression level of PHYA increased rapidly, 2-6 d with a smaller velocity, 6-8 d kept unchanged, but the control group began to decline from the second day. The change of the expression of PLYA in the treatment group from 4 to 8 day was higher than that of control group. The expression level of PIF4 of the control and the treatment kept the same change trend, from 0 to 6 day the difference was that on 4-8 day the treatment group was higher than the control, especially on the sixth day, it was 1.85 times higher than the control. COP1 gene in control group showed a slow decreasing trend while treatment group increased first and then decreased, the peak appeared on the second day, and on 8 d down to the control group. In the whole process, GAI in the treatment group tended to increase continuously, the control group that in increased slightly on 0-4 day and then declined rapidly. The expression of IAA1 in the treatment group and control group on the 0-2 d increased slightly, and that in the control group on the 2-4 d decreased rapidly. After 2 days, the expression level of IAA1 changed little. Irradiance at 15% induced the PHYA, COP1, IAA1 and PIF4 gene expression. Irradiance at 15% increased GAI transcript level. Exogenous GA inhibited the expression of COP1 and PIF4 expression and down regulated GAI and IAA1 level. PAC inhibited the expression of COP1, PIF4, GAI and IAA1. 【Conclusion】All these data indicated that the expression of PHYA, COP1, IAA1 and PIF4 wasinduced by low light, the GAI transcript level increased under low light. GA and ethylene involved in shade avoidance process of chrysanthemum.

Key words: Chrysanthemum morifolium, hormone level, shade avoidance symptom, gene expression

[1]    Franklin K A, Whitelam G C. Phytochromes and shade-avoidance responses in plants. Annals of Botany, 2005, 96(2): 169-175.
[2]    Kurepin L V, Walton L J, Reid D W, Pharis R P, Chinnappa C. Growth and ethylene evolution by shade and sun ecotypes of Stellaria longipes in response to varied light quality and irradiance. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2006, 29(4): 647-652.
[3]    Ballare C L. Illuminated behaviour: phytochrome as a key regulator of light foraging and plant anti-herbivore defence. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2009, 32(6): 713-725.
[4]    Franklin K A. Shade avoidance. New Phytologist, 2008, 179(4): 930-944.
[5]    Hornischek P, Kohnen M V, Lorrain S, Rougemont J, Ljung K, López-Vidriero I, Franco-Zorrilla J M, Solano R, Trevisan M, Pradervand S. Phytochrome interacting factors 4 and 5 control seedling growth in changing light conditions by directly controlling auxin signaling. The Plant Journal, 2012, 71(5): 699-711.
[6]    Martínez-García J F, Galstyan A, Salla-Martret M, Cifuentes-Esquivel N, GallemíM, Bou-Torrent J. Regulatory components of shade avoidance syndrome. Advances in Botanical Research, 2010, 53: 65-116.
[7]    Abeles F, Morgan P, Saltveit M. Ethylene in Plant Biology. Academic Press, 1992: 123-135.
[8]    Pierik R, Visser E J W. Ethylene is required in tobacco to successfully compete with proximate neighbours. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2003, 26(8): 1229-1234.
[9]    Lee S H, Reid D M. The role of endogenous ethylene in the expansion of Helianthus annuus leaves. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1997, 75(3): 501-508.
[10]   Kurepin L V, Walton L J, Reid D M. Interaction of red to far red light ratio and ethylene in regulating stem elongation of Helianthus annuus. Plant Growth Regulation, 2007, 51(1): 53-61.
[11]   Vandenbussche F, Pierik R, Millenaar F F, Voesenek L A C J, van Der Straeten D. Reaching out of the shade. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2005, 8(5): 462-468.
[12]   Kurepin L V, Pharis R P, Reid D M, Chinnappa C. Involvement of gibberellins in the stem elongation of sun and shade ecotypes of Stellaria longipes that is induced by low light irradiance. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2006, 29(7): 1319-1328.
[13]   Pierik R, Cuppens M L C, Voesenek L A C J, Visser E J W. Interaction between ethylene and gibberellins in phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance responses in tobacco. Plant Physiology, 2004, 136(2): 2928-2936.
[14]   Pierik R, Tholen D, Poorter H, Visser E J W, Voesenek L A C J. The Janus face of ethylene: growth inhibition and stimulation. Trends in Plant Science, 2006, 11(4): 176-183.
[15]   Steindler C, Matteucci A, Sessa G, Weimar T, Ohgishi M, Aoyama T, Morelli G, Ruberti I. Shade avoidance responses are mediated by the ATHB-2 HD-zip protein, a negative regulator of gene expression. Development, 1999, 126(19): 4235-4245.
[16]   Swarup R, Parry G, Graham N, Allen T, Bennett M. Auxin cross-talk: integration of signaling pathways to control plant development. Plant Molecular Biology, 2002, 49(3): 409-424.
[17]   Vandenbussche F, Vriezen W H, Smalle J, Laarhoven L J J, Harren F J M, Van Der Straeten D. Ethylene and auxin control the Arabidopsis response to decreased light intensity. Plant Physiology, 2003, 133(2): 517-527.
[18]   Achard P, Vriezen W H, Van Der Straeten D, Harberd N P. Ethylene regulates Arabidopsis development via the modulation of DELLA protein growth repressor function. The Plant Cell Online, 2003, 15(12): 2816-2825.
[19]   Fu X, Harberd N P. Auxin promotes Arabidopsis root growth by modulating gibberellin response. Nature, 2003, 421(6924): 740-743.
[20]   Stepanova A N, Robertson-Hoyt J, Yun J, Benavente L M, Xie D Y, Schlereth A, Jürgens G, Alonso J M. TAA1-mediated auxin biosynthesis is essential for hormone crosstalk and plant development. Cell, 2008, 133(1): 177-191.
[21]   Stamm P, Kumar P P. The phytohormone signal network regulating elongation growth during shade avoidance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010, 61(11): 2889-2903.
[22]   Bauer D, Viczián A, Kircher S, Nobis T, Nitschke R, Kunkel T, Panigrahi K C S, Ádám É, Fejes E, Schäfer E. Constitutive photomorphogenesis 1 and multiple photoreceptors control degradation of phytochrome interacting factor 3, a transcription factor required for light signaling in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell Online, 2004, 16(6): 1433-1445.
[23]   Kurepin L V, Walton L J, Reid D M, Pharis R P, Chinnappa C. Growth and ethylene evolution by shade and sun ecotypes of Stellaria longipes in response to varied light quality and irradiance. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2006b, 29(4): 647-652.
[24]   陈远平, 杨文钰. 卵叶韭休眠芽中GA3, IAA, ABA和ZT的高效液相色谱法测定. 四川农业大学学报, 2005, 23(4): 498-500.
Chen Y P, Yang W Y. Determination of GA3, IAA, ABA and ZT in dormant buds of Allium ovalifolium by HPLC. Journal of Sichuan Agriculture University, 2005, 23(4): 498-500. (in Chinese)
[25]   Vandenbussche F, Van Der Straeten D. Shaping the shoot: a circuitry that integrates multiple signals. Trends in Plant Science, 2004, 9(10): 499-506.
[26]   Gawronska H, Yang Y Y, Furukawa K, Kendrick R E, Takahashi N, Kamiya Y. Effects of low irradiance stress on gibberellin levels in pea seedlings. Plant and Cell Physiology, 1995, 36(7): 1361-1367.
[27]   Clúa A, Bottini R, Brocchi G N, Bogino J, Luna V, Montaldi E R. Growth habit of Lotus tenuis shoots and the influence of photosynthetic photon flux density, sucrose and endogenous levels of gibberellins A1 and A3. Physiologia Plantarum, 1996, 98(2): 381-388.
[28]   Potter T I, Rood S B, Zanewich K P. Light intensity, gibberellin content and the resolution of shoot growth in Brassica. Planta, 1999, 207(4): 505-511.
[29]   Lopez-Juez E, Kobayashi M, Sakurai A, Kamiya Y, Kendrick R E. Phytochrome, gibberellins, and hypocotyl growth (A study using the cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) long hypocotyl mutant). Plant Physiology, 1995, 107(1): 131-140.
[30]   Tao Y, Ferrer J L, Ljung K, Pojer F, Hong F, Long J A, Li L, Moreno J E, Bowman M E, Ivans L J. Rapid synthesis of auxin via a new tryptophan-dependent pathway is required for shade avoidance in plants. Cell, 2008, 133(1): 164-176.
[31]   Behringer F J, Davies P J. Indole-3-acetic acid levels after phytochrome-mediated changes in the stem elongation rate of dark- and light-grown Pisum seedlings. Planta, 1992, 188(1): 85-92.
[32]   Sassi M, Lu Y, Zhang Y, Wang J, Dhonukshe P, Blilou I, Dai M, Li J, Gong X, Jaillais, Y. COP1 mediates the coordination of root and shoot growth by light through modulation of PIN1- and PIN2-dependent auxin transport in Arabidopsis. Development, 2012, 139(18): 3402-3412.
[33]   Morelli G, Ruberti I. Shade avoidance responses. Driving auxin along lateral routes. Plant Physiology, 2000, 122(3): 621-626.
[34]   Lorrain S, Allen T, Duek P D, Whitelam G C, Fankhauser C. Phytochrome-mediated inhibition of shade avoidance involves degradation of growth-promoting bHLH transcription factors. The Plant Journal, 2007, 53(2): 312-323.
[35]   Hornitschek P, Kohnen M V, Lorrain S, Rougemont J, Ljung K, LÓpez- Vidriero I, Franco-Zorrilla J M, Solano R, Trevisan M, Pradervand S. Phytochrome interacting factors 4 and 5 contol seedling growth in changing light conditions by directly controlling auxin signaling. The Plant Journal, 2012, 71(5): 699-711.
[36]   Mcnellis T W, von Arnim A G, Araki T, Komeda Y, Miséra Y, Deng X W. Genetic and molecular analysis of an allelic series of cop1 mutants suggests functional roles for the multiple protein domains. The Plant Cell Oneline, 1994, 6(4): 487-500.
[37]   Crocco C D, Holm M, Yanovsky M J, Botto J F. AtBBX21 and COP1 genetically interact in the regulation of shade avoidance. The Plant Journal, 2010, 64(4): 551-562.
[38]   Cao J S, Yu H F, Ye W Z, Yu X L. Identification and characterization of a gibberellin-related dwarf mutant in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata). Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 2005, 80(1): 29-31.
[39]   Feng S, Martinez C, Gusmaroli G, Wang Y, Wang F. Coordinated regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana development by light and gibberellins. Nature, 2008, 451: 475-479.
[40]   Jacobsen S E, Olszewski N E. Mutations at the SPLNDLY locus of Arabidopsis alter gibberellin signal transduction. Plant Cell, 1993, 5: 887-896.
[41]   Lau O S, Deng X W. Plant hormone signaling lightens up: integrators of light and hormones. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2010, 13: 571-577.
[42]   Alabdí D, Blázquez M A. Molecular interactions between light and hormone signaling to control plant growth. Plant Molecular Biology, 2009, 69: 409-417.
[1] ZHANG KeKun,CHEN KeQin,LI WanPing,QIAO HaoRong,ZHANG JunXia,LIU FengZhi,FANG YuLin,WANG HaiBo. Effects of Irrigation Amount on Berry Development and Aroma Components Accumulation of Shine Muscat Grape in Root-Restricted Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 129-143.
[2] GU LiDan,LIU Yang,LI FangXiang,CHENG WeiNing. Cloning of Small Heat Shock Protein Gene Hsp21.9 in Sitodiplosis mosellana and Its Expression Characteristics During Diapause and Under Temperature Stresses [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 79-89.
[3] LAI ChunWang, ZHOU XiaoJuan, CHEN Yan, LIU MengYu, XUE XiaoDong, XIAO XueChen, LIN WenZhong, LAI ZhongXiong, LIN YuLing. Identification of Ethylene Synthesis Pathway Genes in Longan and Its Response to ACC Treatment [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 558-574.
[4] SHU JingTing,SHAN YanJu,JI GaiGe,ZHANG Ming,TU YunJie,LIU YiFan,JU XiaoJun,SHENG ZhongWei,TANG YanFei,LI Hua,ZOU JianMin. Relationship Between Expression Levels of Guangxi Partridge Chicken m6A Methyltransferase Genes, Myofiber Types and Myogenic Differentiation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 589-601.
[5] GUO ShaoLei,XU JianLan,WANG XiaoJun,SU ZiWen,ZHANG BinBin,MA RuiJuan,YU MingLiang. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of XTH Gene Family in Peach Fruit During Storage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4702-4716.
[6] KANG Chen,ZHAO XueFang,LI YaDong,TIAN ZheJuan,WANG Peng,WU ZhiMing. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of CC-NBS-LRR Family in Response to Downy Mildew and Powdery Mildew in Cucumis sativus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3751-3766.
[7] YuXia WEN,Jian ZHANG,Qin WANG,Jing WANG,YueHong PEI,ShaoRui TIAN,GuangJin FAN,XiaoZhou MA,XianChao SUN. Cloning, Expression and Anti-TMV Function Analysis of Nicotiana benthamiana NbMBF1c [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3543-3555.
[8] JIN MengJiao,LIU Bo,WANG KangKang,ZHANG GuangZhong,QIAN WanQiang,WAN FangHao. Light Energy Utilization and Response of Chlorophyll Synthesis Under Different Light Intensities in Mikania micrantha [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2347-2359.
[9] YUAN JingLi,ZHENG HongLi,LIANG XianLi,MEI Jun,YU DongLiang,SUN YuQiang,KE LiPing. Influence of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis on Leaf and Fiber Color of Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1846-1855.
[10] SHU JingTing,JI GaiGe,SHAN YanJu,ZHANG Ming,JU XiaoJun,LIU YiFan,TU YunJie,SHENG ZhongWei,TANG YanFei,JIANG HuaLian,ZOU JianMin. Expression Analysis of IGF1-PI3K-Akt-Dependent Pathway Genes in Skeletal Muscle and Liver Tissue of Yellow Feather Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 2027-2038.
[11] ZHAO Ke,ZHENG Lin,DU MeiXia,LONG JunHong,HE YongRui,CHEN ShanChun,ZOU XiuPing. Response Characteristics of Plant SAR and Its Signaling Gene CsSABP2 to Huanglongbing Infection in Citrus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1638-1652.
[12] ZHAO Le,YANG HaiLi,LI JiaLu,YANG YongHeng,ZHANG Rong,CHENG WenQiang,CHENG Lei,ZHAO YongJu. Expression Patterns of TETs and Programmed Cell Death Related Genes in Oviduct and Uterus of Early Pregnancy Goats [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 845-854.
[13] ZHU FangFang,DONG YaHui,REN ZhenZhen,WANG ZhiYong,SU HuiHui,KU LiXia,CHEN YanHui. Over-expression of ZmIBH1-1 to Improve Drought Resistance in Maize Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4500-4513.
[14] YUE YingXiao,HE JinGang,ZHAO JiangLi,YAN ZiRu,CHENG YuDou,WU XiaoQi,WANG YongXia,GUAN JunFeng. Comparison Analysis on Volatile Compound and Related Gene Expression in Yali Pear During Cellar and Cold Storage Condition [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4635-4649.
[15] LIU ChangYun,LI XinYu,TIAN ShaoRui,WANG Jing,PEI YueHong,MA XiaoZhou,FAN GuangJin,WANG DaiBin,SUN XianChao. Cloning, Expression and Anti-Virus Function Analysis of Solanum lycopersicum SlN-like [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4348-4357.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!