Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (20): 4215-4225.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.20.010

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Lime and Straw Addition on SOC Sequestration in Tier Soil

CAO BinBin(),ZHU YiHui,JIANG YuHan,SHI JiangLan,TIAN XiaoHong()   

  1. College of Natural Resource and Environment, Northwest A&F University /Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and the Agro-environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi
  • Received:2020-02-10 Accepted:2020-06-24 Online:2020-10-16 Published:2020-10-26
  • Contact: XiaoHong TIAN E-mail:caobb0606@163.com;txhong@hotmail.com

Abstract:

【Objective】Soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration is crucial for improving soil fertility and agricultural production sustainability. The soil inorganic carbon (SIC) is closely related to SOC with regarding with inter-transformation, which has also great effect on carbon sequestration. Crop straw return has been recognized as one of the most important organic amendment improving soil organic carbon sequestration in farmland. Meanwhile, the addition of lime also contributes greatly to increasing SIC, thereby affecting the SOC sequestration. However, the mechanism of simultaneous incorporation of crop straw and lime affecting on the CO2 emission, SOC and SIC dynamics are not well understood, and how the SOC sequestration responds to the initial level of SOC is not clear, particularly after straw return. 【Method】 The incubation experiment and stable isotope technique (13C) were used in the study. The two tested soils were collected from a field with continuously cropping of winter wheat for 16 years, which was subjected to differential crop residue and nitrogen managements over long-term, including (1) S0N0 soil (no straw return+ nitrogen fertilizer application: 0); (2) S1N1 soil (high amount of straw return+ nitrogen fertilizer application: 240 kg·hm-2). And then the two soils were both incubated with or without addition of straw and lime for 120 days under 25℃. 【Result】 The study showed that the soil cumulative CO2 emission was observed 42.9% higher in S1N1 soils than that in S0N0 soils, when without straw and lime addition. In both soils, the straw addition alone increased the soil cumulative CO2 emission by averages of 81.6% and 70.4%, respectively, compared with straw absence. Meanwhile, the increase of the cumulative CO2 emission in S0N0 soils was higher than in S1N1 soils. This showed that straw addition had a greater impact on the native OC mineralization in soil with low initial SOC. Lime addition decreased soil cumulative CO2 emission in both soils whether straw addition or not. Straw addition increased the SOC by 2.95 g·kg-1 and 3.19 g·kg-1 in S0N0 soils and S1N1 soils, respectively, while reduced the SOC by 1.36 g·kg-1 in S1N1 soils and did not affect the SOC in S0N0 soils when combining with lime addition. Using13C stable isotope technology, the newly formed organic carbon (OC) in the two soils both significantly increased after straw addition, therein which increased 25.8% in S0N0 soils when compared with S1N1 soils. However, the conjoint addition of lime and straw did not modify the newly formed SOC when compared with the addition of straw alone, which showed that the lime addition had no effect on the decomposition process of straw in the soil. Over all, straw addition alone increased the SOC net sequestration by 3 066.3 mg?kg-1and 2 480.53 mg?kg-1 in S0N0 soils and S1N1 soils, respectively. The conjoint addition of lime and straw had no significant effect on the SOC net sequestration in S0N0 soils, but there was a decreasing trend on the SOC net sequestration in S1N1 soils. Lime addition reduced the cumulative CO2 emission by 469 mg?kg-1 and 529 mg?kg-1 in S0N0 soils and S1N1 soils, respectively, which approximately equaled to the increases in SIC (by 443 mg?kg-1 and 566 mg?kg-1, respectively).【Conclusion】 In conclusion, the soil with low initial SOC content had higher potential in SOC sequestration. Lime addition might be an effective method to affect soil carbon sequestration and reduce soil CO2 emission through chemical reactions.

Key words: soil carbon, soil respiration, straw return, lime, isotope technology

Table 1

Basic physical and chemical properties of the two soils before incubation"

土样
Soil
pH SOC
(g?kg-1)
TN
(g?kg-1)
DOC
(mg?kg-1)
MBC
(mg?kg-1)
CaCO3
(g?kg-1)
NO3--N
(mg?kg-1)
NH4+-N
(mg?kg-1)
δ13C
(‰)
S0N0 8.21a 7.98b 0.77b 7.49b 177.8b 68.6a 6.86b 0.45b -24.514
S1N1 7.99b 12.61a 1.05a 195.7a 447.0a 65.5b 28.59a 1.38a -25.132

Fig. 1

Soil CO2 emission rate (a), cumulative CO2 emission (b) under different treatments The error bars outside the curve represent LSD0.05"

Table 2

Four-way repeated measure ANOVA with incubation time as factor for cumulative CO2 release"

时间
Time
时间×土壤
Time×soil fertility
时间×秸秆
Time×
straw
时间×石灰
Time×
lime
时间×土壤×秸秆
Time×soil fertility×straw
时间×土壤×石灰
Time×soil fertility×lime
时间×秸秆×石灰
Time×straw
×lime
时间×土壤×秸秆×石灰
Time×soil fertility×straw×lime
P P P P P P P P
CO2累积释放量
Cumulative CO2 emission
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Table 3

Effects of straw and lime amendment on cumulative CO2 emission, SOC and SIC"

处理
Treatment
CO2释放量
CO2 emission (mg?kg-1)
增加量
Increase amount (mg?kg-1)
SOC
(mg?kg-1)
增加量
Increase amount (mg?kg-1)
SIC
(mg?kg-1)
增加量
Increase amount (mg?kg-1)
S0N0 M0 600b - 7280b - 8380a -
M1 3564a 2964 10480a 3200 8390a 10
S1N1 M0 1193b - 12440b - 7823a -
M1 4027a 2833 14435a 1995 7783a -40
S0N0 L0 2316a - 8825a - 8160b -
L1 1847b -469 8940a 115 8610a 443
S1N1 L0 2912a - 13575a - 7520b -
L1 2383b -529 13300b -275 8086a 566

Fig. 2

Difference of SOC content under different treatments Error bars represent standard errors of the mean values. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between different treatments at P<0.05"

Table 4

Differences between soil straw-derived organic carbon formation and decomposition of native organic carbon under different treatments"

处理
Treatment
丰度值
δ13C
13C abundance
(‰)
土壤有机碳
(Ctotal)
Final SOC
(g?kg-1)
源自秸秆碳比例(fnew)
New OC proportion (%)
源自秸秆碳
New OC
(g?kg-1)
源自原土壤碳比例(fnative)
Native SOC proportion (%)
源自土壤有机碳
Native SOC
(g?kg-1)
S0N0 L0 M0 -23.54 7.35e 0 0 100 7.35b
M1 -21.61 10.30d 28.9 2.98a 71.1 7.32b
L1 M0 -23.52 7.22e 0 0 100 7.22b
M1 -21.49 10.66d 32.4 3.45a 67.6 7.21b
S1N1 L0 M0 -25.28 12.48c 0 0 100 12.48a
M1 -23.48 14.67a 15.1 2.21b 84.9 12.46a
L1 M0 -25.42 12.40c 0 0 100 12.40a
M1 -23.46 14.20b 15.2 2.15b 84.8 12.04a

Fig. 3

Differences between soil organic carbon net sequestrations under different treatments Initial soil organic carbon content: S0N0: 7.98 g?kg-1, S1N1: 12.61g?kg-1. Lowercase letters in the figure indicate significant differences of final SOC between different treatments at P<0.05; Uppercase letters indicate significant differences of soil organic carbon net sequestration between different treatments at P<0.05"

Fig. 4

Difference of SIC content under different treatments Error bars represent standard errors of the mean values. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the two fertility soil treatments at P<0.05. Asterisk above the bars indicates statistically significant differences between lime-unamended and corresponding lime-amended soils"

[1] LEHMANN J, KLEBER M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter.Nature, 2015(528):60-68.
[2] LAL R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 2004,304(5677):1623-1627.
doi: 10.1126/science.1097396 pmid: 15192216
[3] CHEN C R, XU Z H, MATHERS N J. Soil carbon pools in adjacent natural and plantation forests of subtropical Australia. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2004,68(1):282-291.
[4] HUSSAIN S, SHARMA V, ARYA V M, SHARMA K R, CH S. Total organic and inorganic carbon in soils under different land use/land cover systems in the foothill Himalayas. Catena, 2019,182:104.
[5] BATJES N H. Soil carbon stocks of Jordan and projected changes upon improved management of croplands. Geoderma, 2006,132(3-4):361-371.
[6] AN H, WU X Z, ZHANG Y R, TANG Z S. Effects of land-use change on soil inorganic carbon: A meta-analysis. Geoderma, 2019,353:273-282.
[7] 霍丽丽, 赵立欣, 孟海波, 姚宗路. 中国农作物秸秆综合利用潜力研究. 农业工程学报, 2019,35(13):218-224.
HUO L L, ZHAO L X, MENG H B, YAO Z L. Study on straw multi-use potential in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019,35(13):218-224.(in Chinese)
[8] ZHANG J, HU K, LI K, ZHENG C, LI B. Simulating the effects of long-term discontinuous and continuous fertilization with straw return on crop yields and soil organic carbon dynamics using the DNDC model. Soil & Tillage Research, 2017,165:302-314.
[9] SILVEIRA M L, LIU K, SOLLENBERGER L E, FOLLETT R F, VENDRAMINI J M B. Short-term effects of grazing intensity matter accumulation in cultivated and native grass soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2013,62:1367-1377.
[10] HE Y T, ZHANG W J, XU M G, TONG X G, SUN F X, WANG J Z, HUANG S M, ZHU P, HE X H. Long-term combined chemical and manure fertilizations increase soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in aggregate fractions at three typical cropland soils in China. Science of the Total Environment, 2015,532(1):635-644.
[11] KUZYAKOV Y. Priming effects: interactions between living and dead organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010,42(9):1363-1371.
[12] LI S, LI Y B, LI X S, TIAN X H, ZHAO A Q, WANG S J, WANG S X, SHI J L. Effect of straw management on carbon sequestration and grain production in a maize-wheat cropping system in Anthrosol of the Guanzhong Plain. Soil & Tillage Research, 2016,157(303):43-51.
[13] FONTAINE S, MARIOTTI A, ABBADIE L. The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003,35:837-843.
[14] EDWARDS K R, PICEK T, ČÍŽKOVÁ H, ZEMANOVÁ K M, STARÁ A. Nutrient addition effects on carbon fluxes in wet grasslands with either organic or mineral soil. Wetlands, 2015,35:55-68.
[15] KIRKBY C A, RICHARDSON A E, WADE L J, PASSIOURA J B, BATTEN G D, BLANCHARD C, KIRKEGAARD J A. Nutrient availability limits carbon sequestration in arable soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014,68:402-409.
[16] 陈宗定, 许春雪, 安子怡, 王亚平, 孙德忠, 王苏明. 土壤碳赋存形态及分析方法研究进展. 岩矿测试, 2019,38(2):104-115.
CHEN Z D, XU C X, AN Z Y, WANG Y P, SUN D Z, WANG S M. Research Progress on Fraction and Analysis Methods of Soil Carbon. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019,38(2):104-115. (in Chinese)
[17] PARADELO R, VIRTO I, CHENU C. Net effect of liming on soil organic carbon stocks: a review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2015,202(1):98-107.
[18] AYE N S, SALE P W G, TANG C. The impact of long-term liming on soil organic carbon and aggregate stability in low-input acid soils. Biology &Fertility of Soils, 2016,52:697-709.
[19] 何翠翠, 王立刚, 王迎春, 张文, 杨晓辉. 长期施肥下黑土活性有机质和碳库管理指数研究. 土壤学报, 2015(1):194-202.
HE C C, WANG L G, WANG Y C, ZHANG W, YANG X H. Effect of long-term fertilization on labile organic matter in and carbon pool management index of black soil.Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015(1):194-202. (in Chinese)
[20] 姜振辉, 师江澜, 贾舟, 丁婷婷, 田霄鸿. 秸秆还田配施中微量元素对农田土壤有机碳固持的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(4):1196-1202.
JIANG Z H, SHI J L, JIA Z, DING T T, TIAN X H. Effects of straw returning combined with medium and microelements application on soil organic carbon sequestration in cropland. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(4):1196-1202. (in Chinese)
[21] WU L, ZHANG W J, WEI W J, HE Z L, KUZYAKOV Y, BOL R, HU R G. Soil organic matter priming and carbon balance after straw addition is regulated by long-term fertilization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019,135:383-391.
[22] 张蕊, 赵钰, 何红波, 张旭东. 基于稳定碳同位素技术研究大气CO2浓度升高对植物-土壤系统碳循环的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017,28(7):2379-2388.
ZHANG R, ZHAO Y, HE H B, ZHANG X D. Investigation on effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on plant-soil system carbon cycling: Based on stable isotopic technique. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017,28(7):2379-2388. (in Chinese)
[23] 寇太记, 朱建国, 谢祖彬, 刘钢, 曾青. 大气CO2浓度升高和氮肥水平对麦田土壤有机碳更新的影响. 土壤学报, 2009,46(3):459-465.
KOU T J, ZHU J G, XIE Z B, LIU G, ZENG Q. Effect of elevated atmospheric pCO2 and nitrogen level on replacement rate of soil organic carbon in winter wheat field. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2009,46(3):459-465. (in Chinese)
[24] SINGH B P, COWIE A L. Long-term influence of biochar on native organic carbon mineralization in a low-carbon clayey soil. Scientific Reports, 2014,4(3687):1-9.
[25] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[26] CHIANG P N, WANG M K, CHIU C Y, KING H B, HWONG J L. Change in the grassland-forest boundary at Ta-Ta-China long term ecological research (LTER) site detected by stable isotope ratio of soil organic matter. Chemosphere. 2004; 54:217-224.
pmid: 14559272
[27] 李顺姬, 邱莉萍, 张兴昌. 黄土高原土壤有机碳矿化及其与土壤理化性质的关系. 生态学报, 2010,30(5):1217-1226.
LI S J, QIU L P, ZHANG X C. Mineralization of soil organic carbon and its relations with soil physical and chemical properties on the Loess Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010,30(5):1217-1226. (in Chinese)
[28] SCHMATZ R, RECOUS S, AITA C, TAHIR M M, SCHU A L, CHAVES B, GIACOMINI S J. Crop residue quality and soil type influence the priming effect but not the fate of crop residue C. Plant and Soil, 2017,414:229-245.
[29] KUZYAKOV Y, FRIEDEL J K, STAHR K. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2000,32(11):1485-1498.
[30] CHEN R, SENBAYRAM M, BLAGODATSKY S, MYACHINA O, DITTERT K, LIN X G, BLAGODATSKAYA E, KUZYAKOV Y. Soil C and N availability determine the priming effect: microbial N mining and stoichiometric decomposition theories. Global Change Biology, 2014,20(7):2356-2367.
pmid: 24273056
[31] FALCHINI L, NAUMOVA N, KUIKMAN P J, BLOEM J, NANNIPIERI P. CO2 evolution and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of bacterial communities in soil following addition of low molecular weight substrates to simulate root exudation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2003,35(6):775-782.
[32] 戚瑞敏, 赵秉强, 李娟, 林治安, 李燕婷, 杨相东, 李志杰. 添加牛粪对长期不同施肥潮土有机碳矿化的影响及激发效应. 农业工程学报, 2016,32(2):118-127.
QI R M, ZHAO B Q, LI J, LIN Z A, LI Z T, YANG X D, LI Z J. Effects of cattle manure addition on soil organic carbon mineralization and priming effects under long-term fertilization regimes. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016,32(2):118-127. (in Chinese)
[33] SHAHBAZ M, KUZYAKOV Y, SANAULLAH M, HEITKAMP F, ZELENEV V, KUMAR A, BLAGODATSKAYA E. Microbial decomposition of soil organic matter is mediated by quality and quantity of crop residues: mechanisms and thresholds. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2017,53:287-301.
[34] CRAINE J M, MORROW C, FIERER N O. Microbial nitrogen limitation increases decomposition. Ecology, 2007,88:2105-2113.
doi: 10.1890/06-1847.1 pmid: 17824441
[35] KOWALENKO C G, IHNAT M. Residual effects of combinations of limestone, zinc and manganese applications on soil and plant nutrients under mild and wet climatic conditions. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2013,93(1):113-125.
[36] ZHAO H L, ZHANG H J, ABDUL G, LIU J F, CHEN Y L, CHU S J, TIAN X H. Enhancing organic and inorganic carbon sequestration in calcareous soil by the combination of wheat straw and wood ash and/or lime. PLoS ONE, 2018,13(10):e0205361.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205361 pmid: 30304053
[37] SHAHBAZ M, KUMAR A, KUZYAKOV Y, BÖRJESSON G, BLAGODATSKAYA E. Priming effects induced by glucose and decaying plant residues on SOM decomposition: A three-source, 13C/14C partitioning study. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018,121:138-146.
[38] STEWART C E, PAUSTIAN K, CONANT R T, PLANTE A F, SIX J. Soil carbon saturation: Evaluation and corroboration by long-term incubations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008,40(7):1741-1750.
[39] KAISER M, ELLERBROCK R H, WULF M, DULTZ S, HIERATH C, SOMMER M. The influence of mineral characteristics on organic matter content, composition, and stability of top soils under long-term arable and forest land use. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2015,117:1-16.
[40] LIM S S, CHOI W J. Changes in microbial biomass, CH4 and CO2, emissions, and soil carbon content by fly ash co-applied with organic inputs with contrasting substrate quality under changing water regimes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014,68(1):494-502.
[1] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[2] LIU ShuJun,LI DongChu,HUANG Jing,LIU LiSheng,WU Ding,LI ZhaoQuan,WU YuanFan,ZHANG HuiMin. Effects of Straw Returning and Potassium Fertilizer on Soil Aggregate and Potassium Distribution Under Rapeseed-Rice Rotation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4651-4663.
[3] WANG Liang,LIU YuanYuan,QIAN Xin,ZHANG Hui,DAI HongCui,LIU KaiChang,GAO YingBo,FANG ZhiJun,LIU ShuTang,LI ZongXin. The Single Season Wheat Straw Returning to Promote the Synergistic Improvement of Carbon Efficiency and Economic Benefit in Wheat- Maize Double Cropping System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 350-364.
[4] REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,PENG XiHong,ZHENG BenChuan,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Interspecific Distances on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Root Spatial Distribution of Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(10): 1903-1916.
[5] MA LiXiao,LI Jing,ZOU ZhiChao,CAI AnDong,ZHANG AiPing,LI GuiChun,DU ZhangLiu. Effects of No-Tillage and Straw Returning on Soil C-Cycling Enzyme Activities in China: Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1913-1925.
[6] JIN YuTing,LIU YunFeng,HU HongXiang,MU Jing,GAO MengYao,LI XianFan,XUE ZhongJun,GONG JingJing. Effects of Continuous Straw Returning with Chemical Fertilizer on Annual Runoff Loss of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Rice-Rape Rotation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1937-1951.
[7] Xu LI,WeiLing DONG,ALin SONG,YanLing LI,YuQiu LU,EnZhao WANG,XiongDuo LIU,Meng WANG,FenLiang FAN. Effects of Straw Addition on Soil Biological N2-Fixation Rate and Diazotroph Community Properties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(5): 980-991.
[8] ZHOU Liang,XIAO Feng,XIAO Huan,ZHANG YuSheng,AO HeJun. Effects of Lime on Cadmium Accumulation of Double-Season Rice in Paddy Fields with Different Cadmium Pollution Degrees [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 780-791.
[9] WANG XinYuan,ZHAO SiDa,ZHENG XianFeng,WANG ZhaoHui,HE Gang. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Application Rate on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Winter Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 5043-5053.
[10] ZHOU YongJie,XIE JunHong,LI LingLing,WANG LinLin,LUO ZhuZhu,WANG JinBin. Effects of Long-Term Reduce/Zero Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilizer Reducing on Maize Yield and Soil Carbon Emission Under Fully Plastic Mulched Ridge-Furrow Planting System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 5054-5067.
[11] XinRun YANG,Bei XU,ZhiFeng HE,Jing WU,RuiHua ZHUANG,Chao MA,RuShan CHAI,Kianpoor Kalkhajeh Yusef,XinXin YE,Lin ZHU. Impacts of Decomposing Microorganism Inoculum on Straw Decomposition and Crop Yield in China: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(7): 1359-1367.
[12] ZHU XiaoQing,AN Jing,MA Ling,CHEN SongLing,LI JiaQi,ZOU HongTao,ZHANG YuLong. Effects of Different Straw Returning Depths on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emission and Maize Yield [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(5): 977-989.
[13] JIA LiGuo,SHI XiaoHua,SUYALA Qiqige,QIN YongLin,YU Jing,CHEN Yang,FAN MingShou. Potential Analysis of Organic Fertilizer Substitution for Chemical Fertilizer in Spring Wheat Regions of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4855-4865.
[14] GAO HongJun,PENG Chang,ZHANG XiuZhi,LI Qiang,ZHU Ping,WANG LiChun. Effects of Corn Straw Returning Amounts on Carbon Sequestration Efficiency and Organic Carbon Change of Soil and Aggregate in the Black Soil Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(22): 4613-4622.
[15] YANG JunHao,LUO YongLi,CHEN Jin,JIN Min,WANG ZhenLin,LI Yong. Effects of Main Food Yield Under Straw Return in China: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4415-4429.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!