Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 657-666.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.04.005

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Plant Growth Regulators S3307 and DTA-6 on Carbohydrate Content and Yield in Soybean

LIU Chun-juan1, FENG Nai-jie1, ZHENG Dian-feng1, GONG Xiang-wei1, SUN Fu-dong1SHI Ying1, CUI Hong-qiu1,2, ZHANG Pan-pan1, ZHAO Jing-jing1   

  1. 1Agronomy College of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, Heilongjiang
    2Daqing Branch College, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Daqing163316, Heilongjiang
  • Received:2015-07-20 Online:2016-02-16 Published:2016-02-16

Abstract: 【Objective】The aim of this paper was to investigate the effect of plant growth regulators on carbohydrate content, sucrose metabolizing enzyme activities and yield of soybean in the source-sink theory aiming to provide scientific basis for PGRs on agricultural production.【Method】Foliar spray field experiments were conducted successively in 2013 and 2014 in the main soybean producing zone, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University. The experiment was in the early flowering by foliar spray one time. Taking Hefeng50 and Kefeng16 soybean varieties as the main research materials. Two chemical regulators, 2-N,N-diethylamino ethylcaproate (DTA-6, 60 mg·L-1) and uniconazole (S3307, 50 mg·L-1) were tested with water as the control. The first sampling was carried out after sprayed 30 d, and then leaf samples were collected once every five days. The contents of sucrose, starch or fructose in leaves and seeds, and invertase activity,SPS or SS activity in leaves were measured. The grain yield of soybean were investigated.【Result】At the early seed filling stage(30-35 days since spraying of DTA-6 and S3307), the sucrose,fructose and starch contents of leaves showed the downtrends, and that of seeds showed increasing trends, which showed that more carbohydrates were applied to seeds growth and development. At the middle seed filling stage(35-45 days since spraying of DTA-6 and S3307), the sucrose, fructose and starch contents of leaves always showed increasing trends by S3307 .The sucrose and fructose contents were all higher than the control, which was based to provide sufficient materials for the grain filling. At the late seed filling stage(after the 50th day since the spraying by DTA-6 and S3307), the sucrose contents of leaves reached the maximum by DTA-6 and S3307, and reached significant levels to CK. The starch content of leaves sprayed with S3307 were higher than CK, and the fructose contents of leaves sprayed with DTA-6 were higher than CK. The sucrose contents of seeds were significantly increased by both S3307 and DTA-6 treatments. The fructose contents of two varieties seeds were increased by S3307, but that of Hefeng50 seed was decreased by DTA-6. The starch content of Hefeng50 seed but that were of Kefeng16 seed were increased by both S3307 and DTA-6 treatments, which showed that PGRs were different effect for soybean varieties. With sucrose contents were increased, SPS and SS activities were improved by S3307 and DTA-6. In most times, foliar spray of S3307 and DTA-6 could significantly decrease invertase activity of leaves to regulate carbohydrate metabolism in different varieties. Thereby, sucrose was neutral for carbohydrate metabolism. Balance of carbohydrate metabolism in source and sink by S3307 and DTA-6 to significantly increase yield. To controls(H-CK and K-CK),the yield of PGRs (H-S, H-D and K-S, K-D) treatments were significantly increased by 20.07%, 14.57% and 10.54%, 10.95%. By the correlation analysis, The sucrose contents of the leaves were positively correlated with SPS, SS activities and starch contents of leaves and the sucrose, fructose and starch contents of seeds (0.893**, 0.888** and 0.981** or 0.918**, 0.832 and 0.810), or were negatively correlated with activities and invertase activities and fructose contents of leaves (-0.872 and -0.862).【Conclusion】The activity of SS and SPS which are of great importance in sucrose synthesis were increased and the activity of invertase was decreased by PGRs, the source-sink physiological metabolism of carbohydrates was regulated to increase yield by S3307 were higher than DTA-6.

Key words: PGRs, soybean, source and sink, carbohydrate, physiological metabolism, yield

[1]    Stitt M, Gibon Y, Lunn J E, Piquesa M. Multilevel genomics analysis of carbon signalling during low carbon availability: Coordinating the supply and utilisation of carbon in a fluctuating environment. Functional Plant Biology, 2007, 34(6):526-549.
[2]    Yen H E, Chen Y C, Yen S K, Lin J H. Sugar uptake by photomixotrophic soybean suspension cultures. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 1999, 40: 147-152.
[3]    王志敏, 方保停. 论作物生产系统产量分析的理论模式及其发展. 中国农业大学学报, 2009, 14(1): 1-7.
Wang Z M, Fang B T. A review on theoretical models and development of yield analysis in crop production system. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2009, 14(1): 1-7. (in Chinese)
[4]    Devi K N, Uyas A K, Singh M S, Singh N G. Effect of bioregulators on growth, yield and chemical constituents of soybean (Glycine max). Journal of Agricultural Science, 2011, 3(4): 151-160.
[5]    Ackerson R C. Regulation of soybean embryogenesis by abscisic acid. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1984, 35(3): 403-413.
[6]    Iqbal N, Nazar R, Khan M I R, Masood A, Khan N A. Role of Gibberellins in regulation of source-sink relations under optimal and limiting environmental conditions. Current Science, 2011, 100(7): 998-1007.
[7]    黄卫东, 张平, 李文清. 6-BA对葡萄果实生长及碳、氮同化物运输的影响. 园艺学报, 2002, 29(4): 303-306.
Huang W D, Zhang P, Li W Q. The effects of 6-BA on the fruit development and transportation of carbon and nitrogen assimilates in grape. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2002, 29(4): 303-306. (in Chinese)
[8]    Senn H, Wüthrich K. Paclobutrazol application effects on plant height, seed yield and carbohydrate metabolism in canola. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 2014, 16(3): 471-479.
[9]    Wan Y, Luo Q M, Yan Y H, Yang W Y, Cao X N. Response of morphological characters of soybean to application of growth retardant (uniconazole) at third trifoliate stage. Research on Crops, 2013, 14(3): 792-797.
[10]   Masuda J, Ozaki Y, Okubo H. Regulation in rhizome transition to storage organ in lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) with exogenous gibberellin, gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitors or abscisic acid. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 2012, 81(1): 67-71.
[11]   闫艳红, 万燕, 杨文钰, 王小春, 雍太文, 刘卫国, 张新全. 叶面喷施烯效唑对套作大豆花后碳氮代谢及产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2015, 34(1): 75-81.
Yan Y H, Wan Y, Yang W Y, Wang X C, Yong T W, Liu W G, Zhang X Q. Effect of spraying uniconazole on carbon and nitrogen metabolism and yield of relay strip intercropping soybean. Soybean Science, 2015, 34(1): 75-81. (in Chinese)
[12]   Brown R H, Ethredge W J, King J W. Influence of succinic acid 2,2-dimethylhydrazide on yield and morphological characteristics of starr peanuts(Arachis hypogaea L.)1. Crop Science, 1973, 13(5): 507-510.
[13]   乃杰, 孙聪姝, 宋柏权, 沈雪峰, 郑殿峰, 祖伟. 调节剂对大豆产量形成的影响及其机理研究. 大豆科学, 2007, 28(5): 700-704, 712.
Feng N J, Sun C S, Song B Q, Sheng X F, Zheng D F, Zu W. Effect and mechanism of regulator on soybean yield formation. Soybean Science, 2007, 28(5):700-704, 712. (in Chinese)
[14]   张明才, 何钟佩, 田晓莉, 段留生, 王保民, 翟志席, 李召虎. 植物生长调节剂DTA-6对花生产量、品质及其根系生理调控研究. 农药学学报, 2003, 5(4): 47-52.
Zhang M C, He Z P, Tian X L, Duan L S, Wang B M, Zhai Z X, Li Z H. Regulation of plant growth regulator DTA-6 on peanut yield and quality and its root physiology. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2003, 5(4): 47-52. (in Chinese)
[15]   刘晓冰, Stephen J H, 金剑, 张秋英, 李艳华, 王光华. 增加光照及其与改变源库互作对大豆产量构成因素的影响. 大豆科学, 2006, 25(1): 6-10.
Liu X B, Stephen J H, Jin J, Zhang Q Y, Li Y H, Wang G H. Light enrichment and its interactions with source-sink alteration on yield and yield components in soybean. Soybean Science, 2006, 25(1): 6-10. (in Chinese)
[16]   张志良. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2001: 128-129.
Zhang Z L. Direction for Botany Physiological Experience. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2001:128-129 . (in Chinese)
[17]   张宪政. 作物生理研究法. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1992.
Zhang X Z. Crop Physiology Research Method. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press, 1992. (in Chinese)
[18]   王惠聪, 黄辉白, 黄旭明. 荔枝果实的糖积累与相关酶活性. 园艺学报, 2003, 30(1): 1-5.
Wang H C, Huang H B, Huang X M. Sugar accumulation and related enzyme activities in the litchi fruit of ‘Nuomici’ and ‘Feizixiao’. Acta Horticulturae Sinica , 2003, 30(1):1-5. (in Chinese)
[19]   门福义, 刘梦芸. 马铃薯栽培生理. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1995: 318-326.
Men F Y, Liu M Y. Potato Cultivation Physiology. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press,1995: 318-326. (in Chinese)
[20]   孙红春, 冯丽肖, 谢志霞, 李存东, 李金才. 不同氮素水平对棉花不同部位—铃叶系统生理特性及铃重空间分布的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(8): 1638-1645.
Sun H C, Feng L X, Xie Z X, Li C D, Li J C. Physiological characteristics of boll-leaf system and boll weight space distributing of cotton under different nitrogen levels. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(8): 1638-1645. (in Chinese)
[21]   冯乃杰, 赵黎明, 郑殿峰, 杜吉到, 梁喜龙, 项洪涛. SOD_MDTA-6Cc对大豆生育中后期功能叶片生理特性的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31(1): 23-28.
Feng N J, Zhao L M, Zheng D F, Du J D, Liang X L, Xiang H T. Effect of plant growth regulators (PGRs) SODM, DTA-6 and Cc on some physiological. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Science, 2009, 31(1): 23-28. (in Chinese)
[22]   孙福东, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 崔洪秋, 刘涛, 刘春娟. 不同生长调节剂对无限结荚习性大豆蔗糖积累及转化酶活性的影响. 大豆科学, 2015, 02: 271-276.
Sun F D, Feng N J, Zheng D F, Chui H Q, Liu T, Liu C J. Effect of plant growth regulators (PGRs) DTA-6 and S3307 on sucrose accumulation and invertase activities in inderterminate soybean. Soybean Science, 2015, 02: 271-276. (in Chinese)
[23]   张伟, 邱强, 赵婧, 刘庆东, 刘淑琴, 张鸣浩, 闫晓艳, 赵丽梅. 不同化控调节剂对杂交大豆产量及产量相关性状的调控效应. 作物杂志, 2015, 04: 81-84.
Zhang W, Qiu Q, Zhao J, Liu Q D, Liu S Q, Zhang M H, Yan X Y, Zhao L M. Regulating effects of different plant growth regulators on yield and yield related traits in soybean hybrids. Crops, 2015, 04: 81-84. (in Chinese)
[24]   张锴, 王宇, 李凯, 王成坤, 赵琳, 马娜, 智海剑, 王宗标. 植物生长调节剂Cabrio和Opera对大豆生长以及产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2013, 03: 371-375.
Zhang K, Wang Y, Li K, Wang C K, Zhao L, Ma N, Zhi H J, Wang Z B. Physiological effects of the Cabrio and Opera on the soybean productivity. Soybean Science, 2013, 03: 371-375. (in Chinese)
[25]   Farrar J C, Gallagher J. Sucrose and the integration of metabolism in vascular plants. Plant Science, 2000, 154: 1-11.
[26]   田晓莉, 谭伟明, 李召虎, 王保民, 何钟佩, 段留生. DPC与DTA-6复配对转基因抗虫棉根系功能的调控. 棉花学报, 2006, 18(4): 218-222.
Tian X L, Tan W M, Li Z H, Wang B M, He Z P, Duan L S. The effects of mixture of DPC and DTA-6 on root function of transgenic in-sect-resistant cotton. Cotton Science, 2006, 18(4): 218-222. (in Chinese)
[27]   宋春艳, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 张晓艳, 宋丽萍, 陆旺. 植物生长调节剂对大豆叶片碳代谢相关生理指标的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(3): 91-95.
Song C Y, Feng N J, Zheng D F, Zhang X Y, Song L P, Lu W. Effects of plant growth regulators (PGRs) on carbon metabolism related indicators in soybean leaves. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(3): 91-95. (in Chinese)
[28]   Liu C, Wang Y, Pan K, Zhu T, Li W, Zhang L. Carbon and nitrogen metabolism in leaves and roots of dwarf bamboo (Fargesia denudata Yi) subjected to drought for two consecutive years during sprouting period. Plant Growth Regulationl, 2014, 33: 243-255.
[29]   Arumugam G, Mohamed Sadiq A, Nagalingam M. Panneerselvam A. Production of invertase enzymes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain isolated from sugarcane and grape juices. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2014, 4(5): 29-32.
[30]   杜鲜云, 程继鸿, 杨瑞, 雷慧, 杨柳, 王绍辉. 春化处理对‘北农1号’萝卜碳水化合物含量及相关酶活性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(11): 2303-2309.
Du X Y, Cheng J H, Yang R, Lei H, Yang L, Wang S H. Effects of vernalization on carbohydrate content and sugar-metabolizing enzyme activities in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(11): 2303-2309. (in Chinese)
[31]   刘翔宇, 李娟, 黄敏, 梁春辉, 陈杰忠. 柑橘砧木对砂糖橘果实糖积累的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(11): 2217-2228.
Liu X Y, Li J, Huang M, Liang C H, Chen J Z. Research on influences of rootstock on sugar accumulation in ‘Shatangju’ tangerine fruits. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(11): 2217-2228. (in Chinese)
[1] ZHANG XiaoLi, TAO Wei, GAO GuoQing, CHEN Lei, GUO Hui, ZHANG Hua, TANG MaoYan, LIANG TianFeng. Effects of Direct Seeding Cultivation Method on Growth Stage, Lodging Resistance and Yield Benefit of Double-Cropping Early Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[2] YAN YanGe, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, ZHAO BingQiang, YUAN Liang. Effects of Dextran Modified Urea on Winter Wheat Yield and Fate of Nitrogen Fertilizer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 287-299.
[3] XU JiuKai, YUAN Liang, WEN YanChen, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, LI HaiYan, ZHAO BingQiang. Nitrogen Fertilizer Replacement Value of Livestock Manure in the Winter Wheat Growing Season [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[4] WANG CaiXiang,YUAN WenMin,LIU JuanJuan,XIE XiaoYu,MA Qi,JU JiSheng,CHEN Da,WANG Ning,FENG KeYun,SU JunJi. Comprehensive Evaluation and Breeding Evolution of Early Maturing Upland Cotton Varieties in the Northwest Inland of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 1-16.
[5] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[6] ZHANG Wei,YAN LingLing,FU ZhiQiang,XU Ying,GUO HuiJuan,ZHOU MengYao,LONG Pan. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield of Double Cropping Rice and Utilization Efficiency of Light and Heat Energy in Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 31-45.
[7] DONG YongXin,WEI QiWei,HONG Hao,HUANG Ying,ZHAO YanXiao,FENG MingFeng,DOU DaoLong,XU Yi,TAO XiaoRong. Establishment of ALSV-Induced Gene Silencing in Chinese Soybean Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1710-1722.
[8] XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[9] LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[10] GUO ShiBo,ZHANG FangLiang,ZHANG ZhenTao,ZHOU LiTao,ZHAO Jin,YANG XiaoGuang. The Possible Effects of Global Warming on Cropping Systems in China XIV. Distribution of High-Stable-Yield Zones and Agro-Meteorological Disasters of Soybean in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1763-1780.
[11] WANG HaoLin,MA Yue,LI YongHua,LI Chao,ZHAO MingQin,YUAN AiJing,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui. Optimal Management of Phosphorus Fertilization Based on the Yield and Grain Manganese Concentration of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[12] GUI RunFei,WANG ZaiMan,PAN ShengGang,ZHANG MingHua,TANG XiangRu,MO ZhaoWen. Effects of Nitrogen-Reducing Side Deep Application of Liquid Fertilizer at Tillering Stage on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Fragrant Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[13] LIAO Ping,MENG Yi,WENG WenAn,HUANG Shan,ZENG YongJun,ZHANG HongCheng. Effects of Hybrid Rice on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556.
[14] MA XiaoYan,YANG Yu,HUANG DongLin,WANG ZhaoHui,GAO YaJun,LI YongGang,LÜ Hui. Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[15] LI Qian,QIN YuBo,YIN CaiXia,KONG LiLi,WANG Meng,HOU YunPeng,SUN Bo,ZHAO YinKai,XU Chen,LIU ZhiQuan. Effect of Drip Fertigation Mode on Maize Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!