Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 455-467.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.03.005

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Compensation Effect of Different Soybean Varieties in Potato/Soybean Intercropping Systems

CHEN Guang-rong1, 2, YANG Wen-yu1, ZHANG Guo-hong2, WANG Li-ming2, YANG Ru-ping2, YONG Tai-wen1, LIU Wei-guo1   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Sichuan Agriculture University/Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu 611130
    2Institute of Dryland Agriculture, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Northwest Drought Crop Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture, Lanzhou 730070
  • Received:2015-06-03 Online:2016-02-01 Published:2016-02-01

Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the mechanism of a high yield and an optimum spatial-temporal configuration management in potato-soybean intercropping system. MethodThis study takes a potato-soybean intercropping system with wildly-used and an apparent yield advantage in Northwest irrigation districts as the research object, a field experiment was conducted in two consecutive seasons (2012-2013), the potato-soybean intercropping trials using three soybean varieties including Zhonghuang 30 (early-maturing variety), Jidou 17 (mid maturing variety ) and Qihuang 34 (late maturing variety ) with the sole cropping potato as the control were carried out to determine the dynamic changes of growth stages of soybean, leaf area index, accumulation of dry matter, photosynthetic characteristics, yield components and yieldin order to optimize the reasonable group configuration.ResultIn comparison with the sole cropping, intercropping system led to a delayed reproductive growth stage of soybean but did not change the whole growth period, the duration from planting to flowering was extended, but the duration from flowering to maturing was shortened. The co-growth stage of different soybean varieties was not affected by intercropping, but the reproductive co-growth stage (from flowering to maturing) was remarkable (P0.05, late maturing variety was 12 days, middle-maturing variety was 36 days, early-maturing variety was 42 days).There was a lower increase under intercropping than under sole cropping, the LAI of the late-maturing variety was lower than the mid-maturing and early maturing varieties, significantly (P0.05) during earlier growing stage but higher after the potato had been harvested. There was a significant difference in dry matter accumulation between intercropping and sole cropping during the earlier growing stage, dry matter accumulation of inter-soybean relative to the sole soybean was decreased by 55.73% at 60 days after soybean sowing. The Pn varied considerably by different potato-soybean intercropping systems, and lower than the sole soybean, which the late-maturing variety was higher than the mid-maturing and early maturing varieties significantly (P0.05).When the potato had been harvested (100 days after soybean sowing), the dry matter accumulation and Pn of soybean in all intercropping systems increased, especially mid-maturing and late-maturing varieties, which became much closer to the sole cropping. Compared with sole cropping, the pods per plant, seeds per plant, and seeds per pod of early-maturing soybean in the intercropping system decreased by 24.15%, 22.14% and 18.92%, respectively (P0.05). However, effective pods per plant, seeds per plant, and seeds per pod of the late-maturing soybean decreased by 5.66%, 7.64% and 2.11%, respectively. Finally, the yield of the mid-maturing and late-maturing varieties in intercropping systems are higher than the early-maturing, which increased by 79.85% and 145.08%, with the land equivalent ratio (LER) of 1.77 and 1.83, respectively. ConclusionMid-maturing and late-maturing varieties were a suitable plant type configuration, the whole growth period was longer, the duration from planting to flowering was extended, but the duration from flowering to maturing was shortened, which could improve the leaf area index, photosynthetic efficiency for compensatory growth when the potato had been harvested, showing the stronger intercropping superiority.

Key words: potato, soybean, intercropping, photosynthetic characteristics, yield, compensation effect

[1]    Zhang L, Werf W, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz J H J. Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 2007, 103(3): 178-188.
[2]    Gao Y, Duan A, Sun J S, Li F S, Liu Z G, Liu H, Liu Z D. Crop coefficient and water-use efficiency of winter wheat/spring maize strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 2009, 111(1/2): 65-73.
[3]    王玉庆, 杨忠义, 杨静, 贾学思. 黄土高原半干旱区柴胡种植模式. 应用生态学报, 2011(3): 825-828.
Wang Y Q, Yang Z Y, Yang J, Jia X S. Cropping patterns of Bupleurum chinense in semi-arid region of Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011(3): 825-828. (in Chinese)
[4]    Liu X B, Zhang S L, Zhang X Y, Ding G W, Cruse R M. Soil erosion control practices in Northeast China: A mini-review. Soil and Tillage Research, 2011, 117: 44-48.
[5]    黎健龙, 涂攀峰, 陈娜, 唐劲驰, 王秀荣, 年海, 廖红, 严小龙. 茶树与大豆间作效应分析. 中国农业科学, 2008(7): 2040-2047.
Li J L, Tu P F, Chen N, Tang J C, Wang X R, Nian H, Liao H, Yan X L. Effects of tea intercropping with soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008(7): 2040-2047. (in Chinese)
[6]    LI Q Z, Sun J H, Wei X J, Christie P, Zhang F S, Li L. Overyielding and interspecific interactions mediated by nitrogen fertilization in strip intercropping of maize with faba bean, wheat and barley. Plant and Soil, 2011, 339(1): 147-161.
[7]    Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S. Intercropping with wheat leads to greater root weight density and larger below-ground space of irrigated maize at late growth stages. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2011, 57(1): 61-67.
[8]    Zuo Y M, Zhang F S, Li X L, Cao Y P. Studies on the improvement in iron nutrition of peanut by intercropping with maize on a calcareous soil. Plant Soil, 2000, 220(1): 13-25.
[9]    Kathiresan R M. Integration of elements of a farming system for sustainable weed and pest management in the tropics. Crop Protection, 2007, 26(3): 424-429.
[10]   Bilalis D, Papastylianou P, Konstantas A, Patsiali S, Karkanis A, Efthimiadou A. Weed-suppressive effects of maize-legume intercropping in organic farming. International Journal of Pest Management, 2010, 56(2): 173-181.
[11]   Olorunmaiye P M.Weed control potential of five legume cover crops in maize/cassava intercrop in a southern Guinea savanna ecosystem of Nigeria. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2010, 4(5): 324-329.
[12]   陈光荣, 张国宏, 王立明, 杨如萍. 西北沿黄灌区不同作物间套作大豆产出效果分析, 大豆科学, 2013(5): 614-619.
Chen G R, Zhang G H, Wang L M, Yang R P. Quantitative evaluation and analysis on different cropping patterns of soybean in Northwest irrigation districts along Yellow River. Soybean Science, 2013(5): 614-619. (in Chinese)
[13]   陈玉香, 周道玮, 张玉芬. 玉米苜蓿间作的产量和光合作用. 草业学报, 2004, 12(2) :107-112.
Chen Y X, Zhou D W, Zhang Y F. Yield and photosynthesis of intercropped maize and alfalfa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2004, 12(2): 107-112. (in Chinese)
[14]   Makoi J H J R, Chimphango S B M, Dakora F D. Photosynthesis, water-use efficiency and δ13C of five cowpea genotypes grown in mixed culture and at different densities with sorghum. Photosynthetica, 2010, 48(1): 143-155.
[15]   李伟, 眭晓蕾, 王绍辉, 关秋竹, 胡丽萍, 周明, 孟凡珍, 张振贤. 黄瓜幼苗不同叶位叶片光合特性对弱光的响应. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(11): 3698-3707.
Li W, Sui X L, Wang S H, Guan Q Z, Hu L P, Zhou M, Meng F Z, Zhang Z X. Effects of low light on photosynthetic characteristics of different position leaves of cucumber seedlings. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(11): 3698-3707. (in Chinese)
[16]   吕丽华, 赵明, 赵久然, 陶洪斌, 王璞. 不同施氮量下夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性的变化. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(9): 2624-2632.
Lü L H, Zhao M, Zhao J R, Tao H B, Wang P. Canopy structure and photosynthesis of summer maize under different nitrogen fertilizer application rates. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(9): 2624-2632. (in Chinese)
[17]   焦念元, 宁堂原, 赵春, 王芸, 史忠强, 侯连涛, 付国占, 江晓东, 李增嘉. 玉米花生间作复合体系光合特性的研究. 作物学报, 2006, 32(6): 917-923.
Jiao N Y, Ning T Y, Zhao C, Wang Y, Shi Z Q, Hou L T, Fu G Z, Jiang X D, Li Z J. Characters of photosynthesis in intercropping system of maize and peanut. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006, 32(6): 917-923. (in Chinese)
[18]   何承刚, 黄高宝, 姜华. 氮素水平对间套作小麦和玉米叶片叶绿素含量及品质的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2004, 22(3): 32-34.
He C H, Huang G B, Jiang H. Effect of nitrogen levels on content of chlorophyll and quality of wheat and corn in monocropping and intercropping. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2004, 22(3): 32-34. (in Chinese )
[19]   崔亮, 苏本营, 杨峰, 杨文钰. 不同玉米-大豆带状套作组合条件下光合有效辐射强度分布特征对大豆光合特性和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(8): 1489-1501.
Cui L, Su B Y, Yang F, Yang W Y. Effects of photo-synthetically active radiation on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of soybean in different maize/soybean relay strip intercropping systems. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(8): 1489-1501. (in Chinese)
[20]   王竹, 杨文钰, 伍晓燕, 吴其林. 玉米株型和幅宽对套作大豆初花期形态建成及产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(2): 323-329.
Wang Z, Yang W Y, Wu X Y, Wu Q L. Effects of maize plant type and planting width on the early morphological characters and yield of relay planted soybean. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(2): 323-329. (in Chinese )
[21]   王竹, 杨文钰, 吴其林. 玉/豆套作荫蔽对大豆光合特性与产量的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33(9): 1502-1507.
Wang Z, Yang W Y, Wu Q L. Effects of shading in maize/soybean relay-cropping system on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of soybean. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(9): 1502-1507. (in Chinese)
[22]   宋艳霞, 杨文钰, 李卓玺, 于晓波, 郭凯, 向达兵. 不同大豆品种幼苗叶片光合及叶绿素荧光特性对套作遮荫的响应. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31(4): 474-479.
Song Y X, Yang W Y, Li Z X, Yu X B, Guo K, Xiang D B. The effects of shading on photosynthetic and fluorescent characteristics of soybean seedlings under mazie-soybean relay cropping. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2009, 31(4): 474-479. (in Chinese)
[23]   Zhang F S, Li L. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant and Soil, 2003, 248(1): 305-312.
[24]   Al-Dalain S A. Effect of intercropping of Zea maize with potato Solanum tuberosum L. on potato growth and on the productivity and land equivalent ratio of potato and Zea maize. Agricultural Journal, 2009, 4(3): 164-170.
[25]   Connolly J, Goma H C, Rahim K. The information content of indicators in intercropping research. Agriculture Ecosysterms & Environment, 2001, 87(2): 191-207.
[26]   韩天富, 盖钧镒, 陈风云, 邱家驯. 生育期结构不同的大豆品种总的光周期反应和农艺性状. 作物学报, 1998, 24(5): 550-556.
Han T F, Gai J Y, Chen F Y, Qiu J X. Photoperiod response and agronomic characters of soybean varieties with different growth period structures. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1998, 24(5): 550-556. (in Chinese)
[27]   吴存祥, 李继存, 沙爱华, 曾海燕, 孙石, 杨光明, 周新安, 常汝镇, 年海, 韩天富. 国家大豆品种区域试验对照品种的生育期组归属. 作物学报, 2012, 38(11): 1977-1987.
Wu C X, Li J C, Sha A H, Zeng H Y, Sun S, Yang G M, Zhou X A, Chang R Z, Nian H, Han T F . Maturity groups classification of check varieties in national soybean uniform trials of China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(11): 1977-1987. (in Chinese)
[28]   杨倩, 张惠君, 谢甫锑. 不同来源大豆品种生育期结构与产量关系的研究, 大豆科学, 2008, 27(6): 973-977.
Yang Q, Zhang H J, Xie F T. Relationship of growth stage structure and yield of soybean from different regions. Soybean Science, 2008, 27(6): 973-977. (in Chinese)
[29]   陈学珍, 谢皓, 李欣, 杨建宇, 韩天富, 白宝良. 夏播大豆生育期结构对农艺性状的影响, 华北农学报, 2004, 19(3): 26-30.
Chen X Z, Xie H, Li X, Yang J Y, Han T F, Bai B L. The influences on agronomic characters by the bearing term structure of summer seeding soybean. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2004, 19(3): 26-30. (in Chinese)
[30]   张正翼, 龚万灼, 杨文钰, 马琳. 套作模式下不同大豆品种(系)主要农艺性状与产量的关系. 大豆科学, 2007, 26: 680-686.
Zhang Z Y, Gong W Z, Yang W Y, Ma L. Correlation between agronomic characters and yield in relay-planting soybeans. Soybean Science, 2007, 26: 680-686. (in Chinese)
[31]   Mao L L, Zhang L Z, Li W Q, Werf W, Sun J H, Spiertz H, Li L. Yield advantage and water saving in maize/pea intercrop. Field Crops Research, 2012, 138: 11-20.
[32]   Li R, Hou X Q, Jia Z K, Han Q F, Ren X L, Yang B P. Effects on soil temperature, moisture, and maize yield of cultivation with ridge and full mulching in the rainfed area of the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 2013, 116: 101-109.
[33]   黄高宝. 集约栽培条件下间套作的光能利用理论发展及其应用. 作物学报, 1999, 25(1): 16-24.
Huang G B. Development of light utilization theory for wheat/corn intercropping in condition of intensive cultivation. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1999, 25(1): 16-24. (in Chinese)
[34]   Ruiz R A, Bertero H D. Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. European Journal of Agronomy, 2008, 29(2/3): 144-152.
[35]   Mushagalusa G N, Ledent J F, Draye X. Shoot and root competition in potato/maize intercropping: Effects on growth and yield. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2008, 64(2): 180-188.
[36]   黄承建, 赵思毅, 王季春, 王龙昌, 赵勇, 廖彩琴, 魏鑫, 郝艳睿, 蔡叶茂. 马铃薯/玉米套作对玉米光合特性和产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(11): 1443-1450.
Huang C J, Zhao S Y, Wang J C, Wang L C, Zhao Y, Liao C Q, Wei X, Hao Y R, Cai Y M. Photosynthetic characteristics and yield of potato in potato/maize intercropping systems with different row number ratios. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(11): 1443-1450. (in Chinese)
[37]   Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Li X L, Rengel Z, Yang S C. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercroppingⅡ.Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71: 173-181.
[38]   雍太文, 杨文钰, 向达兵, 陈小容, 万燕. 小麦/玉米/大豆套作的产量、氮营养表现及其种间竞争力的评定. 草业学报, 2012, 21(1): 50-58.
Yong T W, Yang W Y, Xiang D B, Chen X R, Wan Y. Production and N nutrient performance of wheat-maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system and evaluation of interspecies competition. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(1): 50-58. (in Chinese)
[39]   张正翼, 龚万灼, 杨文钰, 马琳. 套作模式下不同大豆品种(系)主要农艺性状与产量的关系. 大豆科学, 2007, 26: 680-686.
Zhang Z Y, Gong W Z, Yang W Y, Ma L. Correlation between agronomic characters and yield in relay-planting soybeans. Soybean Science, 2007, 26: 680-686 .(in Chinese)
[40]   刘小明, 雍太文, 苏本营, 刘文钰, 周丽, 宋春, 杨峰, 王小春,杨文钰. 减量施氮对玉米-大豆套作系统中作物产量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(9): 1629-1638.
Liu X M, Yong T W, Su B Y, Liu W Y, Zhou L, Song C, Yang F, Wang X C, Yang W Y. Effect of reduced N application on crop yield in maize-soybean intercropping system. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(9): 1629-1638. (in Chinese)
[41]   唐劲驰, 终占昌. 不同品种玉米与小麦间套作的比较试验. 杂粮作物, 2000, 20(4): 38-40.
Tang J C, Zhong Z C. Comparative trial of different maize under maize-soybean relay cropping. Rain Fed Crops, 2000, 20(4): 38-40. (in Chinese)
[1] ZHANG XiaoLi, TAO Wei, GAO GuoQing, CHEN Lei, GUO Hui, ZHANG Hua, TANG MaoYan, LIANG TianFeng. Effects of Direct Seeding Cultivation Method on Growth Stage, Lodging Resistance and Yield Benefit of Double-Cropping Early Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[2] YAN YanGe, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, ZHAO BingQiang, YUAN Liang. Effects of Dextran Modified Urea on Winter Wheat Yield and Fate of Nitrogen Fertilizer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 287-299.
[3] XU JiuKai, YUAN Liang, WEN YanChen, ZHANG ShuiQin, LI YanTing, LI HaiYan, ZHAO BingQiang. Nitrogen Fertilizer Replacement Value of Livestock Manure in the Winter Wheat Growing Season [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[4] WANG CaiXiang,YUAN WenMin,LIU JuanJuan,XIE XiaoYu,MA Qi,JU JiSheng,CHEN Da,WANG Ning,FENG KeYun,SU JunJi. Comprehensive Evaluation and Breeding Evolution of Early Maturing Upland Cotton Varieties in the Northwest Inland of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 1-16.
[5] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[6] ZHANG Wei,YAN LingLing,FU ZhiQiang,XU Ying,GUO HuiJuan,ZHOU MengYao,LONG Pan. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield of Double Cropping Rice and Utilization Efficiency of Light and Heat Energy in Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 31-45.
[7] DONG YongXin,WEI QiWei,HONG Hao,HUANG Ying,ZHAO YanXiao,FENG MingFeng,DOU DaoLong,XU Yi,TAO XiaoRong. Establishment of ALSV-Induced Gene Silencing in Chinese Soybean Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1710-1722.
[8] XIONG WeiYi,XU KaiWei,LIU MingPeng,XIAO Hua,PEI LiZhen,PENG DanDan,CHEN YuanXue. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Spring Maize in Sichuan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[9] LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[10] GUO ShiBo,ZHANG FangLiang,ZHANG ZhenTao,ZHOU LiTao,ZHAO Jin,YANG XiaoGuang. The Possible Effects of Global Warming on Cropping Systems in China XIV. Distribution of High-Stable-Yield Zones and Agro-Meteorological Disasters of Soybean in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1763-1780.
[11] WANG HaoLin,MA Yue,LI YongHua,LI Chao,ZHAO MingQin,YUAN AiJing,QIU WeiHong,HE Gang,SHI Mei,WANG ZhaoHui. Optimal Management of Phosphorus Fertilization Based on the Yield and Grain Manganese Concentration of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[12] GUI RunFei,WANG ZaiMan,PAN ShengGang,ZHANG MingHua,TANG XiangRu,MO ZhaoWen. Effects of Nitrogen-Reducing Side Deep Application of Liquid Fertilizer at Tillering Stage on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Fragrant Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[13] LIAO Ping,MENG Yi,WENG WenAn,HUANG Shan,ZENG YongJun,ZHANG HongCheng. Effects of Hybrid Rice on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556.
[14] MA XiaoYan,YANG Yu,HUANG DongLin,WANG ZhaoHui,GAO YaJun,LI YongGang,LÜ Hui. Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[15] LI Qian,QIN YuBo,YIN CaiXia,KONG LiLi,WANG Meng,HOU YunPeng,SUN Bo,ZHAO YinKai,XU Chen,LIU ZhiQuan. Effect of Drip Fertigation Mode on Maize Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!