Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (16): 3112-3120.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.16.002

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Screening of Rapeseed Genotypes with Aluminum Tolerance at Seedling Stage and Evaluation of Selecting Indices

XIONG Jie, ZOU Xiao-yun, CHEN Lun-lin, LI Shu-yu, ZOU Xiao-fen, SONG Lai-qiang   

  1. Institute of Crops, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System for the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanchang 330200
  • Received:2015-01-29 Online:2015-08-16 Published:2015-08-16

Abstract: 【Objective】Rapeseed is the most important oil crop in China, and it is mainly grown in south of the Yangtze River, that is heavily contaminated with aluminum (Al). Al toxicity is one of the important factors that limit rapeseed production in south China. In order to reduce and avoid the harms of Al toxicity to rapeseed, breeding Al-tolerant varieties is a cost-effective and practical way. Therefore, screening and identifying of Al-tolerant genotypes in rapeseed is significant. The main purpose of this paper was to explore the methods of Al tolerance evaluation, and to screen rapeseed genotypes with Al tolerance at seedling stage. 【Method】The Al tolerance of 23 rapeseed genotypes which are cultivated in large areas of Jiangxi Province was investigated by a pot culture. Principal component analysis, subordinate function analysis, clustering analysis and step regression analysis were used to evaluate the Al tolerance of rapeseed based on the Al-tolerance coefficients of morphological and physiological traits under the condition of Al stress and control. These traits included plant height (PH), root length (RL), rhizome thickness (RT), root dry weight (RDW), shoot dry weight (SDW), soluble sugar content in leaf (SSCL), soluble sugar content in root (SSCR), praline content in leaf (PCL), praline content in root (PCR) and SPAD. 【Result】There were significantly different responses of morphological and physiological indexes among genotypes under Al stress. Correlation analysis showed that Al tolerance coefficients had large or small correlation between traits, consequently the data provided were overlapped and only one single index could not accurately evaluate the Al tolerance of each rapeseed. Principal component analysis reduced the complex interrelationships between all indexes to four independent comprehensive components. The four comprehensive components could present 86.36% information of the raw data of the traits related to Al tolerance of rapeseed. The calculate membership function values were measured on the basis of the contribution rates of four comprehensive component values, and then according to the relative importance of the comprehensive components, these values were weighted to obtain the comprehensive evaluation of Al tolerance values (D value) for different genotypes. The cluster analysis was used to divide 23 genotypes into three kinds of Al tolerance type. Three varieties Zheyou50, Deyou5 and Xiangzayou2 were Al-resistant type. Thirteen varieties such as Zhongyouza12, Fengyou730 and so on were moderately Al-resistant type. Seven varieties such as Nanyouza1, Chuangzayou5 and so on were Al-sensitive type. To screen for the identification indexes of Al tolerance at seedling stage of rapeseed, and analyze the relationship between identification indexes and Al tolerance, a mathematical model of Al tolerance evaluation was built. The stepwise regression equation was established based on D value which was assigned as the dependent variable and the indexes of Al-tolerance coefficients which were assigned as independent variables. Al tolerance predictive value and D value of 23 rapeseed varieties were significantly correlated at seedling stage. The step regression analysis showed that plant height, root length, soluble sugar content in leaf and praline content in leaf significantly influenced the Al tolerance and could be the indexes to identify the Al tolerance in rapeseed. 【Conclusion】It is an effective way to comprehensively evaluate the Al tolerance of rapeseed by principal component analysis, clustering analysis and step regression analysis which could be used to screen genotypes of Al tolerance in rapeseed. It not only could avoid the bias and the instability of single index analysis, but also reflect the relationship between different Al-tolerance related traits and Al tolerance in rapeseed.

Key words: rapeseed, aluminum tolerance, principal component analysis, subordinate function, comprehensive evaluation

[1]    Matsumoto H. Cell biology of aluminum toxicity and tolerance in higher plants. International Review of Cytology, 2000, 200: 1-46.
[2]    Von Uexkull H R, Mutert E. Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant and Soil, 1995, 171: 1-15.
[3]    Kochian L V, Hoekenga O A, Pineros M A. How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2004, 55: 459-493.
[4]    Arenhart R A, De Lima J C, Pedron M, Carvalho F E L, Da Silveira J A G, Rosa S B, Caverzan A, Andrade C M B, Schunemann M, Margis R, Margis-Pinheiro M. Involvement of ASR genes in aluminium tolerance mechanisms in rice. Plant Cell and Environment, 2013, 36: 52-67.
[5]    Carver B F, Ownby J D. Acid soil tolerance in wheat. Advances in Agronomy, 1995, 54: 117-173.
[6]    应小芳, 刘鹏, 徐根娣, 吕群丹, 朱申龙. 大豆耐铝毒基因型筛选及筛选指标的研究. 中国油料作物学报, 2005, 27(1): 46-57.
Ying X F, Liu P, Xu G D, Lü Q D, Zhu S L. Screening of soybean genotypes with tolerance to aluminum toxicity and study of the screening indices. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2005, 27(1): 46-57. (in Chinese)
[7]    Yang Z M, Sivaguru M, Horst W J. Aluminum tolerance is achieved by exudation of citric acid from roots of soybean (Glycine max). Physiologia Plantarum, 2001, 110(1): 72-77.
[8]    Howeler R H. Identifying plants adaptable to low pH conditions. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, 1991, 45: 885-904.
[9]    武际, 郭熙盛, 王文军, 朱宏斌. 施用白云石粉对黄红壤酸度和油菜产量的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2006, 28(1): 55-58.
Wu J, Guo X S, Wang W J, Zhu H B. Effect of dolomite application on soil acidity and yield of rapeseed on yellow-red soil. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2006, 28(1): 55-58. (in Chinese)
[10]   王汉中. 我国油菜产需形势分析及产业发展对策. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29(1): 101-105.
Wang H Z. Strategy for rapeseed industry development based on the analysis of rapeseed production and demand in China. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2007, 29(1): 101-105. (in Chinese)
[11]   Dai H X, Ibrahim W, Zheng W T, Dawood M, He X Y, Zhao J, Zhang G P, Li C D, Wu F B. Characteristics of photosynthetic performance, antioxidant capacity and nutrient concentration of Tibetan wild barley in response to aluminium stress. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 2013, 25 (14): 7727-7731.
[12]   Foy C D. Tolerance of barley cultivars to an acid, aluminum-toxic subsoil related to mineral element concentration in their shoots. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1996, 19: 1361-1380.
[13]   Yang Y, Wang Q L, Geng M J, Guo Z H, Zhao Z Q. Al-induced root cell wall chemical components differences of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in Al tolerance. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2011, 10(35): 6762-6772.
[14]   Zhang X B, Liu P, Yang Y, Xu G D. Effect of Al in soil on photosynthesis and related morphological and physiological characteristics of two soybean genotypes. Botanical Studies, 2007, 48: 435-444.
[15]   Ali B, Hasan S A, Hayat S, Hayat Q, Yadav S, Fariduddin Q, Ahmad A. A role for brassinosteroids in the amelioration of aluminium stress through antioxidant system in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2008, 62: 153-159.
[16]   Dai H X, Shan W N, Zhao J, Zhang G P, Li C D, Wu F B. Difference in response to aluminum stress among Tibetan wild barley genotypes. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2011, 174(6): 952-960.
[17]   Giannakoula A, Moustakas M, Syros T, Yupsanis T. Aluminum stress induces up-regulation of an efficient antioxidant system in the Al-tolerant maize line but not in the Al-sensitive line. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2010, 67: 487-494.
[18]   Tabaldi L A, Cargnelutti D, Goncalves J F, Pereira L B, Castro G Y, Maldaner J, Rauber R, Rossato L V, Bisognin D A, Schetinger M R C, Nicoloso F T. Oxidative stress is an early symptom triggered by aluminum in Al-sensitive potato plantlets. Chemosphere, 2009, 76: 1402-1409.
[19]   Hede A R, Skovmand B, Ribaut J M, Gonzalez-de-Leon D, Stolen O. Evaluation of aluminium tolerance in a spring rye collection by hydroponic screening. Plant Breeding, 2002, 121: 241-248.
[20]   Navakode S, Weidner A, Lohwasser U, Roder M S, Borner A. Molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) controlling aluminium tolerance in bread wheat. Euphytica, 2009, 166: 283-290.
[21]   Alvim M N, Ramos F T, Oliveira D C, Isaias R M S, Franca M G C. Aluminium localization and toxicity symptoms related to root growth inhibition in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Journal of Biosciences, 2012, 37: 1079-1088.
[22]   孟庆立, 关周博, 冯佰利, 柴岩, 胡银岗. 谷子抗旱相关性状的主成分与模糊聚类分析. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(8): 2667-2675.
Meng Q L, Guan Z B, Feng B L, Chai Y, Hu Y G. Principal component analysis and fuzzy clustering on drought-tolerance related traits of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(8): 2667-2675. (in Chinese)
[23]   朱宗河, 郑文寅, 张学昆. 甘蓝型油菜耐旱相关性状的主成分分析及综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(9): 1775-1787.
Zhu Z H, Zheng W Y, Zhang X K. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation on morphological and agronomic traits of drought tolerance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(9): 1775-1787. (in Chinese)
[24]   祁旭升, 王兴荣, 许军, 张建平, 米君. 胡麻种质资源成株期抗旱性评价. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(15): 3076-3087.
Qi X S, Wang X R, Xu J, Zhang J P, Mi J. Drought-resistance evaluation of flax germplasm at adult plant stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(15): 3076-3087. (in Chinese)
[25]   廖伯寿, 周蓉, 雷永, 李栋. 花生高产种质的耐铝毒能力评价. 中国油料作物学报, 2000, 22(1): 38-42, 45.
Liao B S, Zhou R, Lei Y, Li D. Evaluation of tolerance to aluminum toxicity in high-yielding groundnut genotypes. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2000, 22(1): 38-42, 45. (in Chinese)
[26]   Ma J F, Nagao S, Sato K, Ito H, Furukawa J, Takeda K. Molecular mapping of a gene responsible for Al-activated secretion of citrate in barley. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004, 55: 1335-1341.
[27]   Moustakas M, Ouzounidou G, Lannoye R. Rapid screening for aluminum tolerance in cereals by use of the chlorophyll fluorescence test. Plant Breeding, 1993, 111: 343-346.
[28]   王军, 周美学, 许如根, 吕超, 黄祖六. 大麦耐湿性鉴定指标和评价方法研究. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(10): 2145-2152.
Wang J, Zhou M X, Xu R G, Lü C, Huang Z L. Studies on selecting and evaluation methods for barley’s (Horedum vulgare L.) waterlogging tolerance. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(10): 2145-2152. (in Chinese)
[29]   Nielsen D C, Nelson N O. Black bean sensitivity to water stress at various growth stages. Crop Science, 1998, 38(2): 422-427.
[30]   王志颖, 刘鹏, 李锦山, 吴惠芳, 刘莹, 卢伯鑫. 铝胁迫下外源有机酸对油菜根系形态及叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2011, 27(4): 756-762.
Wang Z Y, Liu P, Li J S, Wu H F, Liu Y, Lu B X. Effects of exogenous organic acids on root morphology and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of oilseed rape under aluminum stress. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 27(4): 756-762. (in Chinese)
[31]   韦冬萍, 刘鹏, 徐根娣, 蔡妙珍, 韦剑锋. Al胁迫下油菜生物量、Al积累及保护酶系统的响应. 农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(6): 2351-2356.
Wei D P, Liu P, Xu G D, Cai M Z, Wei J F. Response of biomass, Al-accumulation and protective enzyme system of oilseed rape to aluminum stress. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2008, 27(6): 2351-2356. (in Chinese)
[32]   Qian P, Sun R, Basharat B, Ali B, Gill R A, Ling B, Bullet X, Zhou W J. Effects of hydrogen sulfide on growth, antioxidative capacity, and ultrastructural changes in oilseed rape seedlings under aluminum toxicity. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2014, 33(3): 526-538.
[33]   Ali B, Qian P, Sun R, Farooq M A, Gill R A, Wang J, Azam M, Zhou W. Hydrogen sulfide alleviates the aluminum-induced changes in Brassica napus as revealed by physiochemical and ultrastructural study of plant. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22(4): 3068-3081.
[1] WANG YangYang,LIU WanDai,HE Li,REN DeChao,DUAN JianZhao,HU Xin,GUO TianCai,WANG YongHua,FENG Wei. Evaluation of Low Temperature Freezing Injury in Winter Wheat and Difference Analysis of Water Effect Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318.
[2] WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[3] CHAO ChengSheng,WANG YuQian,SHEN XinJie,DAI Jing,GU ChiMing,LI YinShui,XIE LiHua,HU XiaoJia,QIN Lu,LIAO Xing. Characteristics of Efficient Nitrogen Uptake and Transport of Rapeseed at Seedling Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1172-1188.
[4] BIAN NengFei, SUN DongLei, GONG JiaLi, WANG Xing, XING XingHua, JIN XiaHong, WANG XiaoJun. Evaluation of Edible Quality of Roasted Peanuts and Indexes Screening [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 641-652.
[5] LIU ShuJun,LI DongChu,HUANG Jing,LIU LiSheng,WU Ding,LI ZhaoQuan,WU YuanFan,ZHANG HuiMin. Effects of Straw Returning and Potassium Fertilizer on Soil Aggregate and Potassium Distribution Under Rapeseed-Rice Rotation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4651-4663.
[6] SHEN Qian,ZHANG SiPing,LIU RuiHua,LIU ShaoDong,CHEN Jing,GE ChangWei,MA HuiJuan,ZHAO XinHua,YANG GuoZheng,SONG MeiZhen,PANG ChaoYou. Construction of A Comprehensive Evaluation System and Screening of Cold Tolerance Indicators for Cold Tolerance of Cotton at Seedling Emergence Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4342-4355.
[7] DU JinXia,LI YiSha,LI MeiLin,CHEN WenHan,ZHANG MuQing. Evaluation of Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in Different Sugarcane Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130.
[8] HU Xin, ZHANG ZhiLiang, ZHANG Fei, DENG Bo, FANG WeiMin. Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Hybrid Offsprings of Large-Flowered Tea Chrysanthemum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4036-4051.
[9] BAI Fei,BAI GuiPing,WANG ChunYun,LI Zhen,GONG DePing,HUANG Wei,CHENG YuGui,WANG Bo,WANG Jing,XU ZhengHua,KUAI Jie,ZHOU GuangSheng. Effects of Tillage Depth and Shading on Root Growth and Nutrient Utilization of Rapeseed [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2726-2739.
[10] XU Xiao,REN GenZeng,ZHAO XinRui,CHANG JinHua,CUI JiangHui. Accurate Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation of Panicle Phenotypic Traits of Landraces and Cultivars of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
[11] FAN WenJing,LIU Ming,ZHAO Peng,ZHANG QiangQiang,WU DeXiang,GUO PengYu,ZHU XiaoYa,JIN Rong,ZHANG AiJun,TANG ZhongHou. Screening of Sweetpotato Varieties Tolerant to Low Nitrogen at Seedling Stage and Evaluation of Different Nitrogen Efficiencies [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(10): 1891-1902.
[12] YUAN Yuan,WANG Bo,ZHOU GuangSheng,LIU Fang,HUANG JunSheng,KUAI Jie. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Planting Densities on the Yield and Stem Lodging Resistance of Rapeseed [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1613-1626.
[13] LIU QiuYuan,ZHOU Lei,TIAN JinYu,CHENG Shuang,TAO Yu,XING ZhiPeng,LIU GuoDong,WEI HaiYan,ZHANG HongCheng. Comprehensive Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency and Screening of Varieties with High Grain Yield and High Nitrogen Efficiency of Inbred Middle-Ripe Japonica Rice in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1397-1409.
[14] ZHANG Yan,WANG JinSong,DONG ErWei,WU AiLian,WANG Yuan,JIAO XiaoYan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Low-Fertility Tolerance of Different Sorghum Cultivars in Middle-Late-Maturing Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 4954-4968.
[15] ZHAO Rui,ZHANG XuHui,ZHANG ChengYang,GUO JingLei,WANG Yu,LI HongXia. Evaluation and Screening of Nitrogen Efficiency of Wheat Germplasm Resources at Mature Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3818-3833.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!