Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (24): 4878-4885.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.24.011

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Inheritance Tendency of Sugar and Acid Contents in the Reciprocal Cross Progenies’ Fruits of Southern × Northern High Bush Blueberry (Vaccinium)

LIU You-chun1, 2, WEI Yong-xiang2, WANG Xing-dong2, LIU Cheng2, JIANG Ming-san2, ZHANG Duo2, YUAN Xing-fu3, TAO Cheng-guang1,3   

  1. 1College of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866
    2Liaoning Institute of Pomology, Yingkou 115009, Liaoning
    3Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161
  • Received:2014-05-15 Online:2014-12-16 Published:2014-12-16

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of present study is to analyze the effects of parents on inheritance of sugar and acid contents in blueberry fruit, to provide a basis for selecting parents in cross breeding. 【Method】 Sugar and acid contents of southern high bush blueberry ‘Sapphire’ ( high sugar and high acid type), northern high bush blueberry ‘Berkeley’ (middle sugar and low acid type) and their reciprocal cross progenies were investigated with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. 【Result】 Fructose and glucose were the major components of sugar, while citric acid and tartaric acid were the major components of acid. The reciprocal populations exhibited a wide phenotypic variation in fructose, glucose, total sugar, tartaric acid, citric acid and total acid contents where the coefficient of variation (CV) of sugar and acid contents were more than 15% and 30%, respectively, and the range of acid contents was higher than that of sugar contents, indicating that there was a bigger selecting potential for acid content. Mean sugar and acid contents of reciprocal cross progenies were lower than mid-parental values, showing a tendency of depression. The mean sugar contents of progenies inclined to low sugar parent, while the mean acid contents inclined to paternal parent value. The individual and total sugar contents presented a normal distribution, implying sugar contents are quantitative traits and controlled by polygenenes, while individual and total acid presented a skewed distribution, implying acid contents are quantitative traits and may be controlled by both major gene and polygenes. The broad sense heritability (H2) of fructose, glucose, total sugar, citric acid and total acid contents were ranged from 0.66 to 0.86, in which the highest was fructose (0.84 and 0.86 in the reciprocal populations, respectively), indicating that the variations of these traits mainly resulted from inheritance, and they were mainly affected by additive effect, while the H2 of tartaric acid was the lowest (0.22 and 0.30 in the reciprocal populations, respectively), indicating that the variation of tartaric acid is greatly affected by environment factors. 【Conclusion】 The blueberry reciprocal populations exhibited a wide phenotypic variation in both sugar and acid contents, mean sugar and acid contents of progenies were lower than mid-parental values. The sugars contents presented a normal distribution, and were the quantitative traits and controlled by polygenenes. The mean sugar contents of progenies come close to low sugar parent, there exists maternal inheritance on the sugar contents, while the mean acid contents come close to paternal value and were mainly affected by paternal parent.

Key words: blueberry, reciprocal population, sugar, acid, inheritance

[1]    朱军. 运用混合线性模型定位复杂数量性状基因的方法. 浙江大学学报, 1999, 33(3): 327-335.
Zhu J. Mixed model approaches of mapping genes for complex quantitative traits. Journal of Zhejiang University, 1999, 33(3): 327-335. (in Chinese)
[2]    Shi C H, Xue J M, Yu Y G, Yang X E, Zhu J. Analysis of genetic effects on nutrient quality traits in indica rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1996, 92(8): 1099-1102. 
[3]    Letchworth M B, Lambert R J. 1998. Pollen parent effects on oil, protein, and starch concentration in Maize Kernels. Crop Science, 1998, 38: 363-367.
[4]    吴吉祥, 王国建, 朱军, 许馥华, 季道藩. 陆地棉种子性状直接效应和母体效应的遗传分析. 作物学报, 1995, 6(21): 659-664.
Wu J X, Wang G J, Zhu J, Xu F H, Ji D F. Genetic analysis on direct and maternal effects of seed traits in upland cotton Gossypium hirsutum L.). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1995, 6(21): 659-664. (in Chinese)
[5]    Jassem M, Sliwinska E, Pilarczyk W. Maternal inheritance of sugar concent ration. Journal of Sugar Beet Research, 2000, 37(2): 41-53.
[6]    Gilsinger J J, Burton J W, Carter T E. Maternal effects on fatty acid composition of soybean seed oil. Crop Science, 2010, 50: 1874-1881.
[7]    郭印山, 郭修武, 李轶晖, 李成祥, 李坤. 葡萄杂交后代果实成熟期的遗传倾向. 果树学报, 2003, 20(2): 152-154.
Guo Y S, Guo X W, Li Z H, Li C X, Li Q. Inheritance trend in maturity season of grape crossed progenies. Journal of fruit Science, 2003, 20(2): 152-154. (in Chinese)
[8]    李晓刚, 扬青松, 蔺经, 盛宝龙. 梨花期与成熟期遗传规律研究. 江西农业学报, 2010, 22(12): 50-52.
Li X G, Yang Q S, Lin J, Sheng B L. Inheritance in flower season and maturity season of pear. Aata Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2010, 22(12): 50-52. (in Chinese)
[9]    Wu B H, Zhao J B, Chen J, Xi H F, Jiang Q, Li S H. Maternal inheritance of sugars and acids in peach (P. persica (L.) Batsch) fruit. Euphytica, 2012, 188: 333-345.
[10]   许家辉, 余东, 魏秀清, 许玲, 蒋际谋, 黄金松. 枇杷正反交杂种后代果实形状遗传分析. 云南农业大学报, 2008, 23(5): 663-667.
Xu J H, Yu D, Wei X Q, Xu L, Jiang J M, Huang J S. Genetic analysis of fruit agronomic characters in reciprocal hybrid progeny of loquat. Jonrnal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2008, 23(5): 663-667. (in Chinese)
[11]   崔艳波, 陈慧, 乐文全, 张树军, 伍涛, 陶书田, 张绍玲. ‘京白梨’与‘鸭梨’正反交后代果实性状遗传倾向研究. 园艺学报, 2011, 38(2): 215-224.
Cui Y B, Chen H, Le W Q, Zhang S J, Wu T, Tao S T, Zhang S L. Studies on genetic tendency of fruit characters in reciprocal crosses generation between ‘Jingbaili’ and ‘Yali’ pear cultivars. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2011, 38(2): 215-224. (in Chinese)
[12]   Liang Z C, Yang C X, Yang J, Wu B H, Wang L J, Cheng J S, Li S H. Inheritance of anthocyanins in berries of Vitis vinifera grapes. Euphytica, 2009, 167(1): 113-125.
[13]   Liu H F, Wu B H, Fan P G, Xu H Y, Li S H. Inheritance of sugars and acids in berries of grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Euphytica, 2007, 153(1/2): 99-107.
[14]   李俊才, 伊凯, 刘成, 隋洪涛, 王家珍. 梨果实部分性状遗传倾向研究. 果树学报, 2002, 19(2): 87-93.
Li J C, Yi K, Liu C, Sui H T, Wang J Z. Studies on the trend of inheritance of some characters of pear fruit. Journal of fruit Science, 2002, 19(2): 87-93. (in Chinese)
[15]   马瑞娟, 俞明亮, 沈志军, 杜平, 许建兰, 蔡志翔. 霞光油桃×NF油蟠桃组合F1代果实主要性状的遗传倾向. 江苏农业学报, 2007, 23(6): 622-625.
Ma R J, Yu M L, Shen Z J, Du P, Xu J L, Cai Z X. Inheritance Trend of main characters in Fl progeny of nectarine Xiaguang and flat nectarine NF. Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences , 2007, 23(6): 622-625. (in Chinese)
[16]   郭修武, 郭印山, 李轶晖, 李成祥, 李坤. 葡萄杂交后代主要经济性状的遗传倾向. 果树学报, 2004, 21(4): 319-323.
Guo X W, Guo Y S, Li Z H, Li C X, Li Q. Studies on the inheritance trend of the main economic characteristics of crossed grape progeny. Journal of Fruit Science, 2004, 21(4): 319-323. (in Chinese)
[17]   赵习平, 马之胜, 宣立锋, 智福军, 刘占军. 杏杂交后代果实性状的遗传变异研究. 河北农业科学, 2005, 9(1): 28-31.
Zhao X P, Ma Z S, Xuan L F, Zhi F J, Liu Z J. Study on the genetic variation of the fruit traits of apricot filial generation. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 9(1): 28-31. (in Chinese)
[18]   刘志, 伊凯, 王冬梅, 杨巍, 杨锋, 张景娥. 富士杂交后代果实内在品质性状的遗传. 果树学报, 2004, 21(2): 95-102.
Liu Z, Yi K, Wang D M, Yang Wei, Yang F, Zhang J E. Studies on the fruit internal characteristics inheritance trends of Fuji apple variety crossed progenies. Journal of Fruit Science, 2004, 21(2): 95-102. (in Chinese)
[19]   李宝江, 景士西, 丁玉英, 张景娥. 苹果糖酸遗传和选择研究. 遗传学报, 1994, 21(2): 147-154.
Li B J, Jing S X, Ding Y Y, Zhang J E. Studies of the inheritance and selection of sweetness and acidity in apple. Acta Genetica Sinica, 1994, 21(2): 147-154. (in Chinese)
[20]   路文鹏, 宋润刚, 李晓红, 焦培娟, 沈育杰, 刘洪章. 山葡萄种内杂交后代浆果色素、单宁和总酸含量的遗传分析. 吉林农业大学学报, 2003, 25(6): 629-633.
Lu W P, Song R G, Li X H, Jiao P J, Shen Y J, Liu H Z. Genetic analyses of fruit pigment, tannin and total acid of progenies of Vitis amurensis via intraspecific hybridization. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2003, 25(6): 629-633. (in Chinese)
[21]   睢薇, 霍俊伟, 张玉磊. 黑穗醋栗杂交后代果实主要经济性状的遗传倾向研究. 吉林农业大学学报, 2009, 31(5): 502-505, 520.
Hui W, Huo J W, Zhang Y L. Studies on the trend of inheritance of main characters of blackcurrant fruit in hybrid progenies. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2009, 31(5): 502-505, 520. (in Chinese)
[22]   宋润刚, 郑永春, 路文鹏, 李昌禹, 沈育杰, 李晓红, 张宝香, 林兴桂. 山葡萄种内和种间杂交(F1-F4)代果实酸和糖含量的遗传分析. 园艺学报, 2007, 34 (4): 813- 822.
Sun R G, Zhen Y C, Lu W P, Li C Y, Shen Y J, Li X H, Zhang B X, Lin X G. Hereditary analysis of total fruit acid content and sugar content of progenies (F1-F4) of Vitis amurensis Rupr. via intraspecific or interspecific hybridization. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2007, 34 (4): 813-822. (in Chinese)
[23]   刘有春, 陶承光, 魏永祥, 刘成, 王兴东, 刘威生, 杨艳敏. 越橘果实糖酸含量和不同发育阶段的变化及其与叶片中可溶性糖含量的相关关系. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(19): 4110-4118.
Liu Y C, Tao C G, Wei Y X, Liu C, Wang X D, Liu W S, Yang Y M. Fruit sugar and acid content, variation at different fruit development stages and their relationship with leaf soluble sugar content of blueberry. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(19): 4110-4118. (in Chinese)
[24]   Chen X S, Wu Y, Chen M X, He T M, Feng J R, Liang Q, Liu W, Yang H H, Zhang L J. Inheritance and correlation of self-compatibility and other yield components in the apricot hybrid F1 populations. Euphytica, 2006, 150(1/2): 69-74.
[25]   Ryan J J, Dupont J A. Identification and analysis of the major acids from fruit juices and wines. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1973, 21: 45-49.
[26]   Visser T, Schaap A A, De Vries D P. Acidity and sweetness in apple and pear. Euphytica, 1968, 17: 153-167.
[27]   Brown A G, Harvey D M. The nature and inheritance of sweetness and acidity in the cultivated apple. Euphytica, 1971, 20(1): 68-80.
[28]   Visser T, Verhaegh J J. Inheritance and selection of some fruit characters of apple. I. Inheritance of low and high acidity. Euphytica, 1978, 27(3): 753-760.
[29]   王宏伟, 王成荣, 于淼, 戴洪义, 王然. 梨杂交后代果实主要有机酸遗传动态的研究. 青岛农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008 , 25(3): 231-235.
Wang H W, Wang C R, Yu M, Dai H Y, Wang R. Genetic tendency of organic acid in the pear hybrid progeny. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University: Natural Science Edition, 2008, 25(3): 231-235. (in Chinese)
[30]   陈克玲, 陈力耕, 刘建军, 洪棋斌, 李洪雯. 柑桔果实主要性状的遗传倾向研究. 西南农业学报, 2006, 19(6): 1114-1120.
Chen K L, Chen L G, Liu J J, Hong Q B, Li H W. Study on the trend of inheritance of main characters of citrus fruit. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences. (in Chinese), 2006, 19(6): 1114-1120
[1] LIU ZhenShan, TU HongXia, ZHOU JingTing, MA Yan, CHAI JiuFeng, WANG ZhiYi, YANG PengFei, YANG XiaoQin, Kumail Abbas, WANG Hao, WANG Yan, WANG XiaoRong. Genetic Analysis of Fruits Characters in Reciprocal Cross Progenies of Chinese Cherry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 345-356.
[2] XIE YiTong,ZHANG Fei,SHI Jie,FENG Li,JIANG Li. Effects of Exogenous Sucrose on the Postharvest Quality and Chloroplast of Gynura bicolor D.C [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1642-1656.
[3] YU QiLong,HAN YingYan,HAO JingHong,QIN XiaoXiao,LIU ChaoJie,FAN ShuangXi. Effect of Exogenous Spermidine on Nitrogen Metabolism of Lettuce Under High-Temperature Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1399-1410.
[4] CHEN XueSen, YIN HuaLin, WANG Nan, ZHANG Min, JIANG ShengHui, XU Juan, MAO ZhiQuan, ZHANG ZongYing, WANG ZhiGang, JIANG ZhaoTao, XU YueHua, LI JianMing. Interpretation of the Case of Bud Sports Selection to Promote the High-Quality and Efficient Development of the World’s Apple and Citrus Industry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 755-768.
[5] YANG ShiMan, XU ChengZhi, XU BangFeng, WU YunPu, JIA YunHui, QIAO ChuanLing, CHEN HuaLan. Amino Acid of 225 in the HA Protein Affects the Pathogenicities of H1N1 Subtype Swine Influenza Viruses [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 816-824.
[6] ZOU WenXin, SU WeiHua, CHEN YuanXue, CHEN XinPing, LANG Ming. Effects of Long-Term Nitrogen Application on Ammonia Oxidizer Communities for Nitrification in Acid Purple Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 529-542.
[7] SONG JiangTao,SHEN DanDan,GONG XuChen,SHANG XiangMing,LI ChunLong,CAI YongXi,YUE JianPing,WANG ShuaiLing,ZHANG PuFen,XIE ZongZhou,LIU JiHong. Effects of Artificial Fruit Thinning on Sugar and Acid Content and Expression of Metabolism-Related Genes in Fruit of Beni-Madonna Tangor [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4688-4701.
[8] DU JinXia,LI YiSha,LI MeiLin,CHEN WenHan,ZHANG MuQing. Evaluation of Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in Different Sugarcane Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130.
[9] DONG ZeKuan,ZHANG ShuiQin,LI YanTing,GAO Qiang,ZHAO BingQiang,YUAN Liang. Effects of Chelating Agent on Dissolution, Fixation and Fertisphere Transformation of Diammonium Phosphate [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4225-4236.
[10] ZHOU LiPing,YUAN Liang,ZHAO BingQiang,LI YanTing. Effects of Single-Sided Application of Humic Acid on Maize Root Growth [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 339-349.
[11] YuXia WEN,Jian ZHANG,Qin WANG,Jing WANG,YueHong PEI,ShaoRui TIAN,GuangJin FAN,XiaoZhou MA,XianChao SUN. Cloning, Expression and Anti-TMV Function Analysis of Nicotiana benthamiana NbMBF1c [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3543-3555.
[12] ZHANG YingQiang,ZHANG ShuiQin,LI YanTing,ZHAO BingQiang,YUAN Liang. Conversion Characteristics of Different Carboxyl-Containing Organic Acids Modified Urea in Calcareous Fluvo-Aquic Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3355-3364.
[13] LI YiMei,WANG Jiao,WANG Ping,SHI Kai. Function of Sugar Transport Protein SlSTP2 in Tomato Defense Against Bacterial Leaf Spot [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3144-3154.
[14] YAN TongJing,ZHANG DeQuan,LI Xin,LIU Huan,FANG Fei,LIU ShanShan,WANG Su,HOU ChengLi. Effects of Very Fast Chilling on Flavor Quality in Chilled Lamb [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 3029-3041.
[15] HU YaLi,NIE JingZhi,WU Xia,PAN Jiao,CAO Shan,YUE Jiao,LUO DengJie,WANG CaiJin,LI ZengQiang,ZHANG Hui,WU QiJing,CHEN Peng. Effect of Salicylic Acid Priming on Salt Tolerance of Kenaf Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2696-2708.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!