秸秆还田与灌溉方式对大豆玉米带状间作出苗及幼苗生长的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.17.005

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Soybean and maize strip intercropping is an important cultivation pattern for soybean productivity improvement project in China. In this experiment, the effects of straw returning and irrigation methods on the emergence and seedling growth quality in soybean and maize strip intercropping were investigated, in order to provide the theoretical support for the strip intercropping to solve the problem of seedling emergence.【Method】Two-factor split plot zone design was adopted, three straw returning methods (non-returning straw (S1), returning straw with no stubble (S2), and returning straw with stubble (S3)) and three irrigation methods (non-irrigation (W1), check irrigation before sowing (W2), and spray irrigation after sowing (W3)) were set up, and their effects on seedling emergence and growth of strip intercropping crops were researched.【Result】Irrigation could significantly increase soil water content and alleviate soil compactness, thus effectively improving the emergence rate of soybean and maize, and shortening the emergence time. The seedling emergence rates under W3, W2 and W1 with S2 were 71.00%, 45.70% and 38.50% in Yucheng, respectively. The seedling emergence rates under W3, W2 and W1 with S2 were 90.17%, 88.50% and 61.67% in Anju, respectively. The emergence time under W2 and W3 was 3.29 d and 2.92 d shorter than that under W1, respectively. Under different irrigation methods, there was no significant difference in the seedling emergence rate of maize, which could reach more than 90%, but the seedling emergence time was significantly different. The emergence time of maize under W2 and W3 was 1.9 d and 3.1 d shorter than that under W1 in Yucheng, respectively. The emergence time of maize under W2 and W3 was 0.96 d and 0.6 d shorter than that under W1 in Anju, respectively. Straw returning significantly increased soil water content and decreased soil compactness, and the effects in both places were S2>S3>S1. Straw returning to the field under W1 could significantly improve the soybean seedling emergence rate in Yucheng, in which S2 was 45.08% higher than S1. Straw returning had no significant effect on the emergence rate of maize in the two places. Straw returning and irrigation significantly increased the activity of soybean lipase (LPS) and maize α-amylase (α-AL). The LPS of W2 and W3 were 26.86% and 37.77% higher than that of W1, respectively. The LPS under S2 was 14.14% and 18.05% higher than that under S3 and S1, respectively. The α-AL under W2 was 189.47% higher than that under W1, and the α-AL under S2 was 61.52% and 127.33% higher than that under S3 and S1, respectively. The two irrigation treatments could promote the growth and development of soybean and maize, and improve the seedling growth rate and uniformity. The soybean plant height under W3 and W2 was 21.74% and 15.70% higher than that under W1, respectively, wihle the stem diameter was 12.52% and 28.15% higher, respectively, and the leaf area was 11.84% and 38.78% higher, respectively. The maize plant height under W3 and W2 was 21.80% and 20.62% higher than that under W1, respectively, while the stem diameter was 37.69% and 26.39% higher than that under W1, respectively, and the leaf area under W3 was 36.56% and 73.33% higher than that under W2 and W1, respectively. Straw returning significantly affected the growth of maize seedlings in Yucheng, showing S3>S1>S2. The plant height under S3 was 19.92% and 27.31% higher than that under S1 and S2, respectively, while the stem diameter was 27.59% and 59.80% higher, respectively, and the leaf area was 42.76% and 68.54% higher, respectively.【Conclusion】Successful emergence and construction of a good seedling population were the basis for achieving high yield. Spray irrigation after sowing improved the physical structure of the plough layer, thus promoted the emergence of seedlings and shortened the emergence time in strip intercropping, and provided favorable conditions for subsequent crop growth. Returning straw with stubble could improve the growth quality of strip intercropping seedlings in Yucheng. Returning straw with no stubble had the characteristics of water storage and alleviating soil compaction, it is beneficial to soybean emergence without irrigation, and has a promoting effect on the formation of strong seedlings of strip intercropping crops in Anju.

Key words: soybean and maize strip intercropping, straw returning, irrigation methods, seedling emergence rate, seedling growth

YANG LiDa, PENG XinYue, ZHU WenXue, ZHAO Jing, YUAN XiaoTing, LIN Ping, LUO Kai, LI YiLing, LUO ChunMing, LI YuZe, YANG WenYu, YONG TaiWen. Effects of Straw Returning and Irrigation Methods on Seedling Emergence and Growth in Soybean and Maize Strip Intercropping[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(17): 3366-3383.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.17.005

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2024/V57/I17/3366

Figures/Tables 17

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Table 1

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Table 2

Effects of straw returning and irrigation methods on soybean plant phenotype"

地区 Region	处理 Treatment		3叶期 V3			5叶期 V5
地区 Region	处理 Treatment		株高 Plant height (cm)	茎粗 Stem diameter (mm)	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)	株高 Plant height (cm)	茎粗 Stem diameter (mm)	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)
禹城 Yucheng	S1	W1	13.58±0.12b	4.49±0.32a	191.80±48.89b	21.43±1.02b	4.88±0.24b	385.62±9.58c
		W2	15.86±0.19a	4.56±0.31a	258.55±28.04ab	23.66±1.42b	5.62±0.16ab	543.77±42.35b
		W3	15.79±0.30a	4.86±0.17a	296.94±8.85a	26.40±0.83a	5.70±0.07a	632.17±18.17a
	S2	W1	14.19±0.43b	4.31±0.17a	235.97±25.86b	20.18±1.05b	5.42±0.28ab	534.00±7.72b
		W2	13.82±0.23b	3.67±0.13b	183.78±15.34b	19.27±0.13b	4.84±0.12b	379.70±25.52c
		W3	15.97±0.59a	4.91±0.09a	323.91±5.57a	24.59±0.29a	5.84±0.11a	627.74±8.77a
	S3	W1	14.79±0.40b	3.69±0.14b	175.56±28.91b	22.34±0.58b	5.36±0.26a	464.84±28.83b
		W2	16.49±0.69a	4.30±0.30ab	269.93±48.93a	24.62±0.28ab	5.15±0.40a	498.13±38.28b
		W3	17.22±0.37a	4.85±0.11a	294.22±7.04a	25.84±0.56a	5.82±0.40a	603.84±46.14a
秸秆还田 Straw mulching (S)			10.89**	2.72ns	0.58ns	11.78**	0.07ns	0.72ns
灌溉方式 Irrigation regime (W)			20.68**	10.89**	10.05**	23.26**	5.23*	28.71**
秸秆还田×灌溉方式 S×W			3.29*	2.98*	2.07ns	2.15ns	1.89ns	7.79**
安居 Anju	S1	W1	13.03±0.18c	3.40±0.14b	321.92±4.88b	19.92±0.94b	3.75±0.07b	386.28±10.15b
		W2	15.03±0.27b	3.62±0.04b	363.99±7.82ab	24.10±0.72a	4.27±0.15a	525.16±48.63a
		W3	16.60±0.56a	3.99±0.02a	395.09±33.60a	23.96±0.92a	4.60±0.23a	571.56±45.33a
	S2	W1	14.39±0.31b	3.78±0.13a	326.01±10.56b	22.91±0.83b	4.40±0.11a	541.07±65.83b
		W2	15.62±0.31a	4.12±0.05a	410.00±17.09a	26.68±0.84a	4.64±0.13a	687.67±15.64a
		W3	16.10±0.32a	3.94±0.07a	376.93±6.46a	26.76±0.82a	4.80±0.15a	637.81±16.96ab
	S3	W1	14.18±0.48a	3.38±0.08c	345.82±8.54a	21.01±0.38b	3.98±0.09b	479.50±12.62b
		W2	14.62±0.33a	3.76±0.13b	367.75±10.18a	23.59±0.64a	4.52±0.25a	562.62±23.01ab
		W3	14.89±0.38a	4.22±0.25a	384.59±6.24a	25.22±0.31a	4.64±0.27a	619.53±20.39a
秸秆还田Straw mulching (S)			3.73*	3.94*	0.41ns	11.68**	4.77*	10.53**
灌溉方式Irrigation regime (W)			22.93**	14.66**	12.98**	26.13**	12.28**	15.10**
秸秆还田×灌溉方式 S×W			4.01*	2.81ns	1.95ns	0.50ns	0.60ns	0.95ns

Table 2

Table 3

Effects of straw returning and irrigation methods on maize plant phenotype"

地区 Region	处理 Treatment		4叶期 V4			6叶期 V6
地区 Region	处理 Treatment		株高 Plant height (cm)	茎粗 Stem diameter (mm)	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)	株高 Plant height (cm)	茎粗 Stem diameter (mm)	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)
禹城 Yucheng	S1	W1	43.23±0.89b	5.11±0.25b	228.49±19.14c	68.58±2.10b	10.24±1.20a	833.37±108.45b
		W2	52.01±1.65a	7.49±0.43a	363.71±11.73b	80.40±0.17a	12.45±0.80a	1184.37±65.15a
		W3	54.14±1.29a	7.73±0.56a	438.14±13.30a	81.49±1.63a	11.56±0.58a	1253.68±15.50a
	S2	W1	40.72±2.49b	4.08±0.85a	193.54±24.02b	71.42±4.00a	12.15±1.09a	771.30±62.95b
		W2	40.32±1.88b	4.97±0.85a	201.97±14.57b	62.57±3.60b	8.77±1.22b	655.39±90.52b
		W3	48.44±3.6a	5.79±0.76a	307.99±33.20a	79.66±5.12a	11.79±1.10a	1164.43±104.89a
	S3	W1	51.84±3.67b	6.52±0.49b	326.20±14.87b	77.76±1.88a	11.79±0.59a	1060.67±69.73b
	S3	W2	54.13±1.43ab	6.55±0.62b	380.78±22.65b	83.48±1.66a	12.92±0.35a	1308.53±21.38a
		W3	58.67±1.47a	8.47±0.68a	470.60±30.44a	85.56±2.06a	12.81±0.86a	1237.77±70.26ab
秸秆还田Straw mulching (S)			20.44**	13.93**	41.73**	11.31**	4.63*	16.18**
灌溉方式Irrigation regime (W)			10.75**	8.21**	39.20**	9.08**	1.21ns	14.82**
秸秆还田×灌溉方式 S×W			1.18ns	1.25ns	2.39ns	4.14*	3.16*	5.12*
安居 Anju	S1	W1	31.17±0.50b	3.36±0.12b	99.70±3.94b	70.40±2.45b	8.77±0.53a	817.61±53.96b
		W2	37.69±3.88a	4.24±0.27a	197.74±5.56a	79.00±3.23ab	10.02±1.05a	1076.68±53.49a
		W3	36.89±1.52ab	4.17±0.13a	170.68±8.16a	88.80±4.89a	10.98±0.39a	1292.93±115.62a
	S2	W1	31.28±1.90b	3.72±0.03b	116.27±8.04c	78.02±2.59a	9.74±0.40a	917.12±10.68b
		W2	41.71±0.60a	4.61±0.10a	180.75±8.32b	85.09±5.81a	9.78±1.10a	1149.20±64.10ab
		W3	40.93±2.78a	4.87±0.27a	218.04±28.58a	90.34±2.82a	11.04±0.98a	1312.72±19.10a
	S3	W1	31.01±0.68b	3.36±0.18b	95.89±10.53b	75.23±8.08b	9.57±1.34a	1026.97±36.44b
		W2	36.38±0.83a	3.82±0.14ab	131.42±2.04a	87.44±7.00ab	10.81±0.87a	1203.13±185.54ab
		W3	36.67±2.92a	3.94±0.16a	149.42±4.42a	91.89±3.18a	11.57±0.78a	1394.38±79.51a
秸秆还田Straw mulching (S)			2.14ns	12.67**	12.39**	1.18ns	0.52ns	2.19ns
灌溉方式Irrigation regime (W)			12.07**	21.14**	38.06**	7.98*	3.26ns	17.51**
秸秆还田×灌溉方式 S×W			0.49ns	0.95ns	3.34*	0.18ns	0.17ns	0.13ns

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 37

[1]	杨文钰, 雍太文, 王小春, 刘卫国, 杨峰, 张黎骅, 刘江. 玉米-大豆带状复合种植技术体系创建与应用. 中国高新科技, 2020, 15: 149-151.
	YANG W Y, YONG T W, WANG X C, LIU W G, YANG F, ZHANG L H, LIU J. Establishment and application of maize-soybean relay strip intercropping technology system. China High-tech, 2020, 15: 149-151. (in Chinese)
[2]	雍太文, 杨文钰. 玉米大豆带状复合种植技术的优势、成效及发展建议. 中国农民合作社, 2022(3): 20-22.
	YONG T W, YANG W Y. The advantages, effects and development suggestions of maize-soybean strip composite planting technology. China Farmers’ Cooperatives, 2022(3): 20-22. (in Chinese)
[3]	许艳丽, 赵丹, 李春杰, 司兆胜, 张思佳, 潘凤娟. 作物轮作系统土壤淋溶液对大豆、玉米和小麦种子发芽的影响. 土壤与作物, 2013, 2(1): 18-24.
	XU Y L, ZHAO D, LI C J, SI Z S, ZHANG S J, PAN F J. Effect of soil leachates from different crop rotation systems on seed germination in soybean, corn and wheat. Soils and Crops, 2013, 2(1): 18-24. (in Chinese)
[4]	KRANZ B, KOCH M, SCHAPFL M, FISCHER L. Investigation of the germination of barley and wheat grains with a design of experiments for the production of hydrolases. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 2015, 53(2): 127-135. pmid: 27904341
[5]	DING L N, GUO X J, LI M, FU Z L, YAN S Z, ZHU K M, WANG Z, TAN X L. Improving seed germination and oil contents by regulating the GDSL transcriptional level in Brassica napus. Plant Cell Reports, 2019, 38(2): 243-253.
[6]	WEITBRECHT K, MÜLLER K, LEUBNER-METZGER G. First off the mark: Early seed germination. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011, 62(10): 3289-3309. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err030 pmid: 21430292
[7]	高超, 陈平, 杜青, 付智丹, 罗凯, 林萍, 李易玲, 刘姗姗, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 播期、密度对带状间作大豆茎叶生长及产量形成的影响. 作物学报, 2023, 49(11): 3090-3099. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.34029
	GAO C, CHEN P, DU Q, FU Z D, LUO K, LIN P, LI Y L, LIU S S, YONG T W, YANG W Y. Effects of sowing date and density on stem, leaf growth, and yield formation in strip intercropping soybean. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(11): 3090-3099. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.34029
[8]	XU C L, ZHAO H X, ZHANG P, WANG Y Y, HUANG S B, MENG Q F, WANG P. Delaying wheat seeding time and maize harvest improved water use efficiency in a warm temperature continental monsoon climate. Agronomy Journal, 2018, 110(4): 1420-1429.
[9]	XU C L, LI R D, SONG W W, WU T T, SUN S, SHEN W L, HU S X, HAN T F, WU C X. Integrating straw management and seeding to improve seed yield and reduce environmental impacts in soybean production. Agronomy, 2021, 11(6): 1033.
[10]	王怀苹, 杨明达, 张素瑜, 李帅, 关小康, 王同朝. 不同节水灌溉方式对夏玉米生长、产量及水分利用的影响. 作物杂志, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1808.S.20230914.1022.002.
	WANG H P, YANG M D, ZHANG S Y, LI S, GUAN X K, WANG T C. Effects of different water-saving irrigation modes on growth, yield, and water utilization of summer maize. Crops, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1808.S.20230914.1022.002. (in Chinese)
[11]	武婷婷, 吴存祥. 土壤结皮对大豆出苗的影响及黄淮海地区的关键解决技术. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(5): 813-817.
	WU T T, WU C X. The influence of soil crusting on emergence of soybean and its key solution in Huang-Huai-Hai River valley. Soybean Science, 2017, 36(5): 813-817. (in Chinese)
[12]	ZHANG L H, ZHAO H X, XU C, YAN W P, SUN N, TAN G B, YU J, MENG X M, LI F, BIAN S F. Effects of straw returning on soil moisture and maize yield in semi-humid area. Cereal Research Communications, 2022, 50(3): 539-548.
[13]	CHEN S Y, ZHANG X Y, PEI D, SUN H Y, CHEN S L. Effects of straw mulching on soil temperature, evaporation and yield of winter wheat: Field experiments on the North China Plain. Annals of Applied Biology, 2007, 150(3): 261-268.
[14]	王宁, 闫洪奎, 王君, 李必富, 张永坤, 曹敏建. 不同量秸秆还田对玉米生长发育及产量影响的研究. 玉米科学, 2007, 15(5): 100-103.
	WANG N, YAN H K, WANG J, LI B F, ZHANG Y K, CAO M J. Research on effects of different amount straws return to field on growth development and yield of maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2007, 15(5): 100-103. (in Chinese)
[15]	高俊, 汪慧泉, 顾东祥, 张斯梅, 张传辉, 顾克军. 秸秆还田对土壤生态及农作物生长发育影响的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(30): 87-93. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0897
	GAO J, WANG H Q, GU D X, ZHANG S M, ZHANG C H, GU K J. Effects of straw returning on soil ecology and crop growth and development. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(30): 87-93. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0897
[16]	王富贵, 邹润厚, 高聚林, 王振, 程志鹏, 郝琪, 张悦忠, 王志刚. 秸秆还田方式对内蒙古东部地区土壤水热及春玉米苗期生长和产量的影响. 作物杂志, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1808.S.20230914.1126.004.
	WANG F G, ZOU R H, GAO J L, WANG Z, CHENG Z P, HAO Q, ZHANG Y Z, WANG Z G. Effects of straw returning methods on soil water and heat and seedling growth and yield of spring maize in Eastern region of Inner Mongolia. Crops, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1808.S.20230914.1126.004. (in Chinese)
[17]	王幸, 吴存祥, 齐玉军, 徐泽俊, 王宗标, 韩天富. 麦秸处理和播种方式对夏大豆农艺性状及土壤物理性状的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(8): 1453-1465. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.08.003.
	WANG X, WU C X, QI Y J, XU Z J, WANG Z B, HAN T F. Effects of straw management and sowing methods on soybean agronomic traits and soil physical properties. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(8): 1453-1465. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.08.003. (in Chinese)
[18]	殷文, 陈桂平, 柴强, 郭瑶, 冯福学, 赵财, 于爱忠, 刘畅. 河西灌区不同耕作与秸秆还田方式对春小麦出苗及产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(2): 180-187.
	YIN W, CHEN G P, CAI Q, GUO Y, FENG F X, ZHAO C, YU A Z, LIU C. Effect of tillage and straw retention mode on seedling emergence and yield of spring wheat in the Hexi irrigation area. Chinese Journal Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(2): 180-187. (in Chinese)
[19]	曹慧英, 王丁波, 史建国, 朱昆仑, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 张吉旺. 播种深度对夏玉米幼苗性状和根系特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8): 2397-2404.
	CAO H Y, WANG D B, SHI J G, ZHU K L, DONG S T, LIU P, ZHAO B, ZHANG J W. Effects of sowing depth on seedling traits and root characteristics of summer maize. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(8): 2397-2404. (in Chinese)
[20]	杨立达, 任俊波, 彭新月, 杨雪丽, 罗凯, 陈平, 袁晓婷, 蒲甜, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 施氮与种间距离下大豆/玉米带状套作作物生长特性及其对产量形成的影响. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 251-264. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.33018
	YANG L D, REN J B, PENG X Y, YANG X L, LUO K, CHEN P, YUAN X T, PU T, YONG T W, YANG W Y. Crop growth characteristics and its effects on yield formation through nitrogen application and interspecific distance in soybean/maize strip relay intercropping. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(1): 251-264. (in Chinese)
[21]	张婧, 吴慧, 燕存尧, 程云霞, 贾凯. 不同营养液对番茄幼苗生长特性及生理活性的影响. 分子植物育种, https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230328.1506.026.html.
	ZHANG J, WU H, YAN C Y, CHENG Y X, JIA K. Effects of different nutrient solutions on the growth characteristics and physiological activities of tomato seedlings. Molecular Plant Breeding, https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230328.1506.026.html. (in Chinese)
[22]	赵继玉, 李睿文, 王琦, 汪顺源, 田玉春, 赵金萌, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 种子分级对夏玉米群体整齐度和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3333-3339. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202312.009
	ZHAO J Y, LI R W, WANG Q, WANG S Y, TIAN Y C, ZHAO J M, REN B Z, ZHAO B, LIU P, ZHANG J W. Effects of seed grading on population regularity degree and yield of summer maize. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(12): 3333-3339. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202312.009
[23]	蔡洪梅, 吴宇, 于敏, 许波, 代雯慈, 王捧娜, 任驿, 张梦祥, 李金才, 陈翔. 长期秸秆全量还田对砂姜黑土区冬小麦幼苗生长质量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2022, 42(10): 1266-1272.
	CAI H M, WU Y, YU M, XU B, DAI W C, WANG P N, REN Y, ZHANG M X, LI J C, CHEN X. Effects of long-term straw returning to field on seedling growth quality of winter wheat in lime concretion black soil area. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2022, 42(10): 1266-1272. (in Chinese)
[24]	吴宗声, 徐彩龙, 李瑞东, 徐一帆, 孙石, 韩天富, 宋雯雯, 吴存祥. 麦秸覆盖还田对大豆耕层物理性状及产量形成的影响. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1052-1064. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24051
	WU Z S, XU C L, LI R D, XU Y F, SUN S, HAN T F, SONG W W, WU C X. Effects of wheat straw mulching on physical properties of topsoil and yield formation in soybean. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(4): 1052-1064. (in Chinese)
[25]	郭山强, 莫彦, 吴忠东, 王建东, 张彦群, 龚时宏, 徐明明, 郭彬, 沈新磊. 华北地区地下滴灌春玉米出苗及生长对沟播开沟深度的响应. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(8): 27-34.
	GUO S Q, MO Y, WU Z D, WANG J D, ZHANG Y Q, GONG S H, XU M M, GUO B, SHEN X L. The effects of furrow depth in alternate row planting on germination and yield of spring maize under subsurface drip irrigation in North China plain. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2021, 40(8): 27-34. (in Chinese)
[26]	ZHAO J L, LU Y, TIAN H L, JIA H L, GUO M Z. Effects of straw returning and residue cleaner on the soil moisture content, soil temperature, and maize emergence rate in China’s three major maize producing areas. Sustainability, 2019, 11(20): 5796.
[27]	王幸, 邢兴华, 徐泽俊, 齐玉军, 季春梅, 吴存祥. 耕作方式和秸秆还田对黄淮海夏大豆产量和土壤理化性状的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2017, 39(6): 834-841.
	WANG X, XING X H, XU Z J, QI Y J, JI C M, WU C X. Effects of tillage and straw returning on soybean yield and soil physicochemical properties in Yellow-Huai-Hai Rivers Valley. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2017, 39(6): 834-841. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2017.06.015
[28]	QIN X L, HUANG T T, LU C, DANG P F, ZHANG M M, GUAN X K, WEN P F, WANG T C, CHEN Y L, SIDDIQUE K H M. Benefits and limitations of straw mulching and incorporation on maize yield, water use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 256: 107128.
[29]	YANG H K, WU G, MO P, CHEN S H, WANG S Y, XIAO Y, MA H A, WEN T, GUO X, FAN G Q. The combined effects of maize straw mulch and no-tillage on grain yield and water and nitrogen use efficiency of dry-land winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 197: 104485.
[30]	MIRANSARI M, SMITH D L. Plant hormones and seed germination. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2014, 99: 110-121
[31]	VOIGT E L, ALMEIDA T D, CHAGAS R M, PONTE L F A, ALMEIDA VIÉGAS R, SILVEIRA J A G. Source-sink regulation of cotyledonary reserve mobilization during cashew (Anacardium occidentale) seedling establishment under NaCl salinity. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2009, 166(1): 80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.02.008 pmid: 18448194
[32]	高阳, 段爱旺, 刘战东, 王和洲, 陈金平, 刘安能. 玉米/大豆间作条件下的作物根系生长及水分吸收. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(2): 307-313.
	GAO Y, DUAN A W, LIU Z D, WANG H Z, CHEN J P, LIU A N. Crop root growth and water uptake in maize/soybean strip intercropping. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(2): 307-313. (in Chinese)
[33]	毛国军, 肖迪, 李龙兵, 杨开琼. 玉米秸秆还田对土壤理化性状及玉米生长发育的影响. 现代农业科技, 2022(21): 14-19, 23.
	MAO G J, XIAO D, LI L B, YANG K Q. Effect of corn straw returning to field on soil physical and chemical properties, corn growth and development. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022(21): 14-19, 23. (in Chinese)
[34]	刘浩, 王芙臣, 于玮淇, 李斐, 边少锋, 赵洪祥. 不同秸秆还田模式对冷凉区玉米生长发育及产量的影响. 分子植物育种, https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.s.20220429.1514.022.html.
	LIU H, WANG F C, YU W Q, LI F, BIAN S F, ZHAO H X. Effects of different straw returning modes on maize growth and yield in cold area. Molecular Plant Breeding, https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.s.20220429.1514.022.html. (in Chinese)
[35]	孔凡丹, 周利军, 郑美玉, 迟彩霞, 张淑花, 张春艳, 杨则已. 秸秆覆盖对黑土区大豆生长及产量构成因素的影响. 大豆科学, 2022, 41(2): 189-195.
	KONG F D, ZHOU L J, ZHENG M Y, CHI C X, ZHANG S H, ZHANG C Y, YANG Z Y. Effects of straw mulching on growth and yield components of soybean in black soil area. Soybean Science, 2022, 41(2): 189-195. (in Chinese)
[36]	殷文, 冯福学, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强, 胡发龙, 郭瑶. 小麦秸秆还田方式对轮作玉米干物质累积分配及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42(5): 751-757.
	YIN W, FENG F X, ZHAO C, YU A Z, CHAI Q, HU F L, GUO Y. Effects of wheat straw returning patterns on characteristics of dry matter accumulation, distribution and yield of rotation maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(5): 751-757. (in Chinese)
[37]	AKWAKWA G H, WANG X Y. Impact of rice-wheat straw incorporation and varying nitrogen fertilizer rates on soil physicochemical properties and wheat grain yield. Agronomy, 2023, 13(9): 2363.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

处理 Treatment		出苗天数 Emergence days
		大豆 Soybean		玉米Maize
		禹城 Yucheng	安居 Anju	禹城 Yucheng	安居 Anju
S1	W1	—	9.13	8.53	6.42
	W2	—	5.84	5.69	5.33
	W3	6.71	6.21	6.01	5.69
S2	W1	—	8.63	7.96	6.39
	W2	—	5.97	6.06	5.43
	W3	6.53	6.26	4.86	5.79
S3	W1	—	11.56	7.17	6.60
	W2	—	7.28	4.63	6.04
	W3	6.65	5.92	4.68	5.51

地区 Region	处理 Treatment		幼苗生长率 Crop growth rate（g•m^-2•d^-1）	幼苗整齐度 Seedings uniformity	壮苗指数 Strong seeding index
禹城 Yucheng	S1	W1	0.15±0.01b	96.90±0.74a	0.71±0.08b
		W2	0.17±0.01a	92.85±2.07a	0.85±0.03ab
		W3	0.20±0.01a	96.65±0.94a	1.05±0.15a
	S2	W1	0.13±0.02b	92.28±2.07b	0.92±0.07b
		W2	0.08±0.01c	94.68±0.28ab	1.07±0.09b
		W3	0.19±0.00a	97.60±0.76a	1.29±0.11a
	S3	W1	0.08±0.03b	90.99±1.88b	0.61±0.04c
		W2	0.16±0.01a	97.07±1.58a	1.00±0.15b
		W3	0.17±0.01a	97.09±0.70a	1.36±0.21a
秸秆还田Straw mulching (S)			19.75**	0.15ns	8.32**
灌溉方式Irrigation regime (W)			49.93**	5.52*	38.17**
秸秆还田×灌溉方式 S×W			17.76**	3.68*	2.90ns
安居 Anju	S1	W1	0.10±0.01b	89.20±2.94a	0.95±0.09b
		W2	0.11±0.01b	94.01±0.51a	1.07±0.08b
		W3	0.14±0.01a	90.84±2.23a	1.30±0.05a
	S2	W1	0.11±0.00c	86.78±2.42b	1.02±0.08b
		W2	0.15±0.01a	90.34±0.90ab	1.40±0.12a
		W3	0.13±0.01b	94.09±0.67a	1.25±0.13a
	S3	W1	0.11±0.01b	85.13±2.29b	0.96±0.13b
		W2	0.13±0.00a	93.64±0.74a	1.27±0.03a
		W3	0.13±0.00a	92.15±2.05a	1.32±0.06a
秸秆还田Straw mulching (S)			7.36**	0.29ns	3.70*
灌溉方式Irrigation regime (W)			43.22**	8.75**	30.50**
秸秆还田×灌溉方式 S×W			6.62**	1.45ns	3.46**

地区 Region	处理 Treatment		幼苗生长率 Crop growth rate（g•m^-2•d^-1）	幼苗整齐度 Seedings uniformity	壮苗指数 Strong seeding index
禹城 Yucheng	S1	W1	2.20±0.16a	91.90±1.02b	1.30±0.15b
		W2	1.95±0.16a	95.55±0.58a	1.81±0.02a
		W3	1.95±0.13a	94.16±0.46ab	1.85±0.13a
	S2	W1	1.58±0.14a	90.64±0.93b	1.30±0.17ab
		W2	1.14±0.08b	93.68±1.10ab	1.01±0.14b
		W3	1.32±0.07ab	94.26±1.24a	1.57±0.18a
	S3	W1	1.61±0.14b	92.73±0.98a	1.41±0.09b
		W2	1.75±0.14ab	93.48±1.79a	1.76±0.10a
		W3	1.94±0.06a	92.88±1.16a	1.83±0.06a
秸秆还田Straw mulching (S)			70.29**	0.75ns	25.12**
灌溉方式irrigation regime (W)			4.99*	4.33*	24.20**
秸秆还田×灌溉方式 S×W			7.03**	0.89ns	8.90**
安居 Anju	S1	W1	0.83±0.11b	88.01±1.28b	1.68±0.16b
		W2	1.12±0.21b	91.52±1.32a	2.31±0.27a
		W3	1.91±0.16a	91.93±0.48a	1.97±0.25ab
	S2	W1	1.22±0.16b	87.99±0.93b	1.57±0.07c
		W2	1.54±0.16ab	91.11±1.36a	1.89±0.12b
		W3	1.64±0.09a	91.84±0.81a	2.58±0.06a
	S3	W1	1.18±0.20a	90.19±0.69a	1.53±0.13b
		W2	1.04±0.08a	91.47±0.69a	1.77±0.28b
		W3	1.28±0.18a	92.30±0.58a	2.50±0.14a
秸秆还田Straw mulching (S)			8.33**	0.94ns	0.42ns
灌溉方式Irrigation regime (W)			27.49**	9.90**	34.13**
秸秆还田×灌溉方式 S×W			9.27**	0.46ns	7.62**

Effects of Straw Returning and Irrigation Methods on Seedling Emergence and Growth in Soybean and Maize Strip Intercropping

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 37

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	SUN Yue, REN KeYu, ZOU HongQin, GAO HongJun, ZHANG ShuiQing, LI DeJin, LI BingJie, LIAO ChuQian, DUAN YingHua, XU MingGang. Effect of Long-Term Straw Returning on the Soil Organic Carbon Bound to Iron Oxides in Black Soil and Fluvo-Aquic Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(19): 3823-3834.
[2]	LIU YaJie, ZHANG TianJiao, ZHANG XiangQian, LU ZhanYuan, LIU ZhanYong, CHENG YuChen, WU Di, LI JinLong. Effects of Tillage Methods Under Straw Returning on the Labile Organic Carbon Fractions and Carbon Pool Management Index in Black Soil Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(17): 3408-3423.
[3]	MA ShengLan, KUANG FuHong, LIN HongYu, CUI JunFang, TANG JiaLiang, ZHU Bo, PU QuanBo. Effects of Straw Incorporation Quantity on Soil Physical Characteristics of Winter Wheat-Summer Maize Rotation System in the Central Hilly Area of Sichuan Basin [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(7): 1344-1358.
[4]	YANG JianJun, GAI Hao, ZHANG MengXuan, CAI YuRong, WANG LiYan, WANG LiGang. Effect of Subsoiling Combined with Straw Returning Measure on Pore Structure of Black Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(5): 892-906.
[5]	GUO RongBo, LI GuoDong, PAN MengYu, ZHENG XianFeng, WANG ZhaoHui, HE Gang. Effects of Long-Term Straw Return and Nitrogen Application Rate on Organic Carbon Storage, Components and Aggregates in Cultivated Layers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(20): 4035-4048.
[6]	WANG YongLiang, XU ZiHang, LI Shen, LIANG ZheMing, XUE XiaoRong, BAI Ju, YANG ZhiPing. Straw Returning and Post-Silking Irrigating Improve the Grain Yield and Utilization of Water and Nitrogen of Spring Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(18): 3599-3614.
[7]	XIE Xue, LU YanHong, LIAO YuLin, NIE Jun, ZHANG JiangLin, SUN YuTao, CAO WeiDong, GAO YaJie. Effects of Returning Chinese Milk Vetch and Rice Straw to Replace Partial Fertilizers on Double Season Rice Yield and Soil Labile Organic Carbon [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(18): 3585-3598.
[8]	LI Jin, REN LiJun, LI XiaoYu, BI RunXue, JIN XinXin, YU Na, ZHANG YuLing, ZOU HongTao, ZHANG YuLong. Effects of Different Straw Returning Patterns on Soil CO₂ Emission and Carbon Balance in Maize Field [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(14): 2738-2750.
[9]	ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[10]	LIU ShuJun,LI DongChu,HUANG Jing,LIU LiSheng,WU Ding,LI ZhaoQuan,WU YuanFan,ZHANG HuiMin. Effects of Straw Returning and Potassium Fertilizer on Soil Aggregate and Potassium Distribution Under Rapeseed-Rice Rotation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4651-4663.
[11]	WANG Liang,LIU YuanYuan,QIAN Xin,ZHANG Hui,DAI HongCui,LIU KaiChang,GAO YingBo,FANG ZhiJun,LIU ShuTang,LI ZongXin. The Single Season Wheat Straw Returning to Promote the Synergistic Improvement of Carbon Efficiency and Economic Benefit in Wheat- Maize Double Cropping System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 350-364.
[12]	GONG XiaoYa,SHI JiBo,FANG Ling,FANG YaPeng,WU FengZhi. Effects of Flooding on Soil Chemical Properties and Microbial Community Composition on Farmland of Continuous Cropped Pepper [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2472-2484.
[13]	JIN YuTing,LIU YunFeng,HU HongXiang,MU Jing,GAO MengYao,LI XianFan,XUE ZhongJun,GONG JingJing. Effects of Continuous Straw Returning with Chemical Fertilizer on Annual Runoff Loss of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Rice-Rape Rotation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1937-1951.
[14]	MA LiXiao,LI Jing,ZOU ZhiChao,CAI AnDong,ZHANG AiPing,LI GuiChun,DU ZhangLiu. Effects of No-Tillage and Straw Returning on Soil C-Cycling Enzyme Activities in China: Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1913-1925.
[15]	Xu LI,WeiLing DONG,ALin SONG,YanLing LI,YuQiu LU,EnZhao WANG,XiongDuo LIU,Meng WANG,FenLiang FAN. Effects of Straw Addition on Soil Biological N₂-Fixation Rate and Diazotroph Community Properties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(5): 980-991.