Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (13): 2818-2829.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.13.011

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on Phosphorus Application Rate Based on Sugarcane Yield and Phosphorus Balance in Soil

OU HuiPing(),ZHOU LiuQiang,HUANG JinSheng,ZHU XiaoHui,ZENG Yan,PENG JiaYu,XIE RuLin,TAN HongWei(),LI ZhongNing,SHEN XiaoWei,LIU XiHui   

  1. Agricultural Resources and Environmental Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/South China Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization Technology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanning 530007
  • Received:2020-08-21 Revised:2020-10-22 Online:2021-07-01 Published:2021-07-12
  • Contact: HongWei TAN E-mail:ouhuiping2006@163.com;hongwei_tan@163.com

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study was conducted to explore the phosphate fertilizer rate based on sugarcane yield and phosphorus (P) balance in soil, with an aim to provide a reference for the efficient utilization and scientific management of P in farmland. 【Method】A 3-year continuous field trail was conducted in Wuming district of Nanning city of Guangxi province from 2014 to 2016, which was designed with five phosphate fertilization treatments, including non-phosphate fertilization (P0), 75 kg P2O5·hm-2 (P1), 150 kg P2O5·hm-2 (P2), 300 kg P2O5·hm-2 (P3) and 600 kg P2O5·hm-2 (P4). The yield of cane and leaves and Olsen-P content in soil were measured, and the relation between cane yield and Olsen-P was evaluated by Mitscherlich model. The agronomic threshold of soil Olsen-P was also calculated. Plant P content, P uptake, P utilization efficiency and P balance in soil were further analyzed. 【Result】Compared with P0 treatment, the cane yield was significantly increased by 8.3% (2014), 18.0% (2015) and 15.5% (2016) under P2 treatment. P2 or P3 treatments had the highest yields for leaves and above-ground part, but there was no significant difference in cane, leaves and above-ground part among different P application rates. P accumulations in cane, leaves and above were also similar among P2 to P4 treatments. Olsen-P content, P balance and P surplus rate increased significantly with the increase of P application rate, while the PRE and PPFP decreased gradually with the increase of P application rate; where P1 treatment was the highest, which was significantly higher than that under P3 and P4 treatments. The agronomic threshold of Olsne-P was 13.4 mg kg-1 based on Mitscherlich model. Correlation analysis showed that P surplus rate was significantly positively correlated with P application rate and soil Olsen-P (P<0.01), and which was significantly quadratic correlated with sugarcane stem yield (P<0.01), and significantly exponential correlated with PRE and PPFP (P<0.01). When P application rate was 40.9 kg·hm-2, P surplus rate, soil Olsen-P content and cane yield were 0,15.87 mg kg-1and 94.2 t·hm-2, respectively. While the maximum cane yield was obtained by linear and platform fitting, soil P surplus rate, Olsen-P content and cane yield were 216.2%-232.7%, 24.7-25.4 mg·kg-1 and 99.7-100 t·hm-2, respectively. 【Conclusion】 In lateritic red soil with relatively high Olsen-P content, the P application rate of 40.9 kg·hm-2would maintain the soil Olsen P content, meet the demand for high yield and high phosphorus utilization efficiency. Thus, it could be used as the recommended P application amount.

Key words: sugarcane, phosphorus application rate, Olsen-P, phosphorus balance

Table 1

Effect of phosphorus application rate on sugarcane yield"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
产量
Yield (t·hm-2)
优化施磷量
P application rate (kg P2O5·hm-2)
线性加平台最高产量
Plateau (t·hm-2)
蔗茎
Cane
蔗叶
Leaf
地上部
Aerial part
蔗茎
Cane
蔗叶
Leaf
地上部
Aerial part
蔗茎
Cane
蔗叶
Leaf
地上部
Aerial part
2014 P0 92.2±1.6 b 21.0±0.5 a 113.2±2.1b 150 150 150 98.8 21.1 119.9
P1 95.0±1.6 ab 20.9±0.2 a 115.9±1.7ab
P2 99.9±2.3 a 21.4±0.5 a 121.3±2.0 a
P3 99.1±2.5 ab 21.0±0.3 a 120.1±2.8 ab
P4 98.5±1.6 ab 20.9±0.7 a 119.4±2.2 ab
2015 P0 89.5±2.7 b 20.6± 0.8 b 110.1±3.5 b 109.9 116.6 110.6 106.4 22.6 129.0
P1 101.1±5.7 ab 21.9±0.2 ab 123.0±5.8 ab
P2 105.6±3.1 a 23.0±0.3 a 128.6±3.5 a
P3 108.6±0.6 a 22.9±0.7 a 131.5±0.5 a
P4 105.1±3.8 a 21.9±0.8 ab 127.0±4.1 a
2016 P0 88.3±1.1 b 16.9±0.4 c 105.2±1.4 c 160.8 176.7 166.3 102.6 25.1 127.7
P1 94.0±2.7 ab 19.2±0.1 bc 113.2±2.6 bc
P2 102.0±1.2 a 24.3±1.3 ab 126.3±2.5 ab
P3 102.3±5.1 a 26.9±1.6 a 129.2±6.5 a
P4 102.9±4.1 a 23.3±2.5 ab 126.3±6.6 ab
平均 Average 140.2 147.8 142.3 102.6 22.9 125.5

Fig. 1

Effects of different phosphorus application rates on soil Olsen-P The different small letters in the same year indicate significant difference between treatments at 0.05 level. The same as below"

Fig. 2

Response of relative yield of cane to soil Olsen-P content"

Table 2

Effect of phosphorus application rate on sugarcane P accumulation"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
蔗茎磷累积量
Cane P accumulation (kg·hm-2)
蔗叶磷累积量
Leaves P accumulation (kg·hm-2)
地上部磷累积量
Aboveground P accumulation (kg·hm-2)
2014 P0 11.2±0.59 b 5.7±0.31 b 16.9±0.87 c
P1 11.7±0.39 b 8.0±0.13 a 19.6±0.52 b
P2 13.3±0.69 a 8.3±0.08 a 21.6±0.69 a
P3 13.5±0.24 a 7.8±0.23 a 21.3±0.41 a
P4 14.1±0.46 a 7.9±0.24 a 22.0±0.23 a
2015 P0 8.5±0.44 b 6.2±0.62 b 14.7±0.90 b
P1 10.4±0.21 ab 8.0±0.05 ab 18.4±0.22 a
P2 12.3±0.29 a 7.1±0.39 ab 19.4±0.51 a
P3 12.5±0.62 a 8.6±0.48 a 21.1±1.11 a
P4 12.4±1.2 a 7.1±0.63 ab 19.5±1.34 a
2016 P0 6.9±0.46 b 4.6±0.15 c 11.5±0.47 c
P1 9.4±0.18 ab 5.4±0.05 bc 14.8±0.14 bc
P2 10.6±0.32 a 6.7±0.24 a 17.3±0.21 ab
P3 10.7±1.52 a 7.3±0.35 a 18.0±1.45 ab
P4 12.2±0.68 a 6.5±0.76 ab 18.6±1.39 a

Fig. 3

Effects of different phosphorus application rates on P balance"

Fig. 4

Effects of different phosphorus application rates on PRE and PPFP"

Fig. 5

The correlation of P surplus rate with phosphorus application rate, cane yield, soil Olsen-P and phosphorus utilization efficiency"

[1] 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):915-924.
ZHANG F S, WANG J Q, ZHANG W F, CUI Z L, MANG W Q, CHEN X P, JIANG R F. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5):915-924. (in Chinese)
[2] 林阿典, 陈雪雯, 黄莹, 黄振瑞, 陈迪文, 敖俊华, 周文灵, 江永, 李奇伟. 甘蔗磷营养研究进展. 甘蔗糖业, 2018(6):51-56.
LIN A D, CHEN X W, HUANG Y, HUANG Z R, CHEN D W, AO J H, ZHOU W L, JIANG Y, LI Q W. Research progresses on phosphorus nutrition in sugarcane. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2018(6):51-56. (in Chinese)
[3] 张淑香, 徐明岗. 土壤磷素演变与高效利用. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(21):3828-3829. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.21.011.
ZHANG S X, XU M G. Change of soil phosphorus and its efficient utilization. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(21):3828-3829. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.21.011. (in Chinese)
[4] MA J C, HE P, XU X P, HE W T, LIU Y X, YANG F Q, CHEN F, LI S T, TU S H, JIN J Y, JOHNSTON A M, ZHOU W. Temporal and spatial changes in soil available phosphorus in China (1990-2012). Field Crops Research, 2016, 192:13-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.006.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.006
[5] 区惠平, 周柳强, 黄金色, 曾艳, 朱晓晖, 谢如林, 谭宏伟, 黄碧燕. 长期不同施肥对甘蔗产量稳定性、肥料贡献率及养分流失的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(10):1931-1939. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.10.012.
OU H P, ZHOU L Q, HUANG J S, ZENG Y, ZHU X H, XIE R L, TAN H W, HUAGN B Y. Effect of long-term different fertilization on sugarcane yield stability, fertilizer contribution rate and nutrition loss. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(10):1931-1939. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.10.012. (in Chinese)
[6] LI Y, STEVEN ARE K, HUANG Z G, GUO H, WEI L C, ABEGUNRIN T P, GU M H, QIN Z H. Particulate N and P exports from sugarcane growing watershed are more influenced by surface runoff than fertilization. Agriculture,Ecosysterms & Environment, 2020, 302:107087. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107087.
[7] 黄琮斌, 李秀平, 李荣喜, 梁春辉, 张祥会. “3414”氮磷钾肥配比对甘蔗农艺性状的影响. 中国糖料, 2018, 40(1):5-7. DOI: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2018.01.002.
HUANG C B, LI X P, LI R X, LIANG C H, ZHANG X H. Effect of “3414” N, P and K fertilizer ratio on agronomic traits of sugarcane. Sugar Crops of China, 2018, 40(1):5-7. DOI: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2018.01.002. (in Chinese)
[8] 林电, 朱治强, 吴淑义, 李如飞, 余能国. 旱地甘蔗配方施肥研究初报. 华南热带农业大学学报, 2005, 11(4):8-11.
LIN D, ZHU Z Q, WU S Y, LI R F, YU N G. Initial report for balanced application of fertilizers to dry land sugarcane. Journal of South China University of Tropical Agriculture, 2005, 11(4):8-11. (in Chinese)
[9] 孙克刚, 李丙奇, 李潮海, 刘京宝, 和爱玲. 砂姜黑土区玉米田土壤有效磷施肥指标及施磷推荐-基于ASI法的土壤养分丰缺指标. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(21):167-171.
SUN K G, LI B Q, LI C H, LIU J B, HE A L. Abundance and deficiency indices of soil available P for maize and fertilization recommendation in Shajiang Black Soil areas-indices of soil Available P based on ASI method. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(21):167-171. (in Chinese)
[10] GERGELY T, RANNVEIG-ANNA G, BRIGITTA T, TAMÁS H. Phosphorus levels in croplands of the European Union with implications for P fertilizer use. European Journal of Agronomy, 2014, 55:42-52. DOI. 10.1016/j.eja.2013.12.008.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.12.008
[11] 吴良泉, 武良, 崔振岭, 陈新平, 张福锁. 中国玉米区域氮磷钾肥推荐用量及肥料配方研究. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(4):802-817. DOI: 10.11766/trxb201409230480.
WU L Q, WU L, CUI Z L, CHEN X P, ZHANG F S. Basic NPK fertilizer recommendation and fertilizer formula for maize production regions in China. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(4):802-817. DOI: 10.11766/trxb201409230480. (in Chinese)
[12] 刘彦伶, 李渝, 张雅蓉, 张文安, 蒋太明. 长期施肥对黄壤性水稻土磷平衡及农学阈值的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(10):1903-1912. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.10.007.
LIU Y L, LI Y, ZHAGN Y R, ZHAGN W A, JIAGN T M. Effect of long-term fertilization on the P balance and critical value of soil Olsen-P in paddy soil from yellow earth. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(10):1903-1912. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.10.007. (in Chinese)
[13] 郭鑫年, 孙娇, 梁锦绣, 周涛, 田旭东, 陈刚. 栽培方式与施磷量对水稻养分累积、分配及磷素平衡的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(4):104-111. DOI: 10.11838/sfsc.20170416.
SUN X N, SUN J, LIAGN J X, ZHOU T, TIAN X D, CHEN G. Cultivation way and phosphorus fertilizer on rice nutrient accumulation, distribution and soil phosphorus balance. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017(4):104-111. DOI: 10.11838/sfsc.20170416. (in Chinese)
[14] 连彩云, 马忠明. 干旱绿洲灌区大白菜施磷效应与磷肥投入阈值. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(2):592-598. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001–9332.201802.027.
LIAN C Y, MA Z M. Phosphorus application effects and input threshold of Chinese cabbage in the oasis irrigation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(2):592-598. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001–9332.201802.027. (in Chinese)
[15] CAO N, CHEN X, CUI Z, ZHAGN F. Change in soil available phosphorus in relation to the phosphorus budget in China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2012, 94:161-170. DOI: 10.1007/s10705-012-9530-0.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-012-9530-0
[16] 吴启华, 刘晓斌, 张淑香, 尹彩侠, 李桂花, 谢佳贵. 施用常规磷水平的 80% 可实现玉米高产、磷素高效利用和土壤磷平衡. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(6):1468-1476. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.16005.
WU Q H, LIU X B, ZHAGN S X, YIN C X, LI G H, XIE J G. Application of 80% of routine phosphorus rate to keep high yield and P efficiency of maize and P balance in soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(6):1468-1476. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.16005. (in Chinese)
[17] 李杨瑞. 现代甘蔗学. 北京中国农业出版社, 2010: 1.
LI Y R. Modern Sugarcane Science. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2010: 1. (in Chinese)
[18] 尚怀国, 李莉, 王克健, 谭宏伟, 兰宗宝, 杨本鹏, 彭李顺, 冷杨. 甘蔗生产化肥农药减施增效技术研究进展. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(1):211-216. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.1.034.
SHANG H G, LI L, WANG K J, TAN H W, LAN Z B, YANG B P, PENG L S, LENG Y. Research progress on chemical fertilizer and pesticide application reduction and efficiency enhancement technologies of sugarcane production. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(1):211-216. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.1.034. (in Chinese)
[19] 谭宏伟. 甘蔗施肥管理. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2009: 88.
TAN H W. Fertilization Management on Sugarcane. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2009: 88. (in Chinese)
[20] 段正品, 曹连福, 孙廷富, 段曰亮. 甘蔗3414 肥料试验. 云南农业, 2016(8):50-52.
DUAN Z P, CAO L F, SUN Y F, DUAN Y L. Fertilizer test of sugarcane “3414”. Yunnan Agriculture, 2016(8):50-52. (in Chinese)
[21] 雷崇华, 江翠平, 覃剑峰. 甘蔗测土配方施肥经济效益的研究. 广西热带农业, 2010(2):9-12.
LEI C H, JIANG C P, QIN J F. Study on economic benefit of soil testing and fertilizer recommendation of sugarcane. Agricultural Research and Application, 2010(2):9-12. (in Chinese)
[22] 朱晓晖, 黄金生, 曾艳, 区惠平, 周柳强, 谢如林, 谭宏伟. 红壤植蔗区施磷的淋溶风险评估. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(3):532-537. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.Scjas.2018.3.018.
ZHU X H, HUANG J S, ZENG Y, OU H P, ZHOU L Q, XIE R L, TAN H W. Phosphorous leaching risk assessment of sugarcane planting in red soil area. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(3):532-537. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.Scjas.2018.3.018. (in Chinese)
[23] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000.
LU R K. Analytical Methods for Agrochemistry of Soils. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[24] 侯云鹏, 王立春, 李前, 尹彩侠, 秦裕波, 王蒙, 王永军, 孔丽丽. 覆膜滴灌条件下基于玉米产量和土壤磷素平衡的磷肥适用量研究. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(20):3573-3584. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.20.008.
HOU Y P, WANG L C, LI Q, YIN C X, QIN Y B, WANG M, WANG Y J, KONG L L. Research on optimum phosphorus fertilizer rate based on maize yield and phosphorus balance in soil under film mulched drip irrigation conditions. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(20):3573-3584. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.20.008. (in Chinese)
[25] 区惠平, 周柳强, 黄美福, 黄金生, 韦运兰, 谢如林, 曾艳, 刘昔辉, 朱晓晖, 谭宏伟. 不同施磷量下稻田土壤磷素平衡及其潜在环境风险评估. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(1):40-47. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.14298.
OU H P, ZHOU L Q, HUANG M F, HUANG J S, WEI Y L, XIE R L, ZENG Y, LIU X H, ZHU X H, TAN H W. Phosphorus balance in paddy soils and its environmental effect under different phosphorus application rates. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(1):40-47. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.14298. (in Chinese)
[26] 林诚, 王飞, 李清华, 何春梅, 张辉. 长期不同施肥下南方黄泥田有效磷对磷盈亏的响应特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(5):1175-1183. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.16444.
LIN C, WANG F, LI Q H, HE C M, ZHANG H. Response characteristics of Olsen-P to P balance in yellow paddy fields of southern China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(5):1175-1183. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.16444. (in Chinese)
[27] 贾良平, 陈新平, 张福锁, 刘宏斌, 吴健繁. 北京市冬小麦氮肥适宜用量评价方法的研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2001, 6(3):67-73.
JIA L P, CHEN X P, ZHANG F S, LIU H B, WU J F. Study of optimum N supplying rate in winter wheat in Beijing area. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2001, 6(3):67-73. (in Chinese)
[28] 魏猛, 张爱君, 李洪民, 唐忠厚, 陈晓光. 基于长期施肥下潮土磷素演变及农学阈值的研究. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(11):2373-2378. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2018.11.025.
WEI M, ZHAGN A J, LI H M, TANG Z H, CHEN X G. Study on evolution characteristics of soil phosphorus and critical value of soil Olsen-P in fluvo-aquic soil under long-term fertilization. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(11):2373-2378. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2018.11.025. (in Chinese)
[29] 谢如林, 谭宏伟, 周柳强, 黄金生, 黄美福, 黄献华, 董文斌, 王磊. 不同氮磷施用量对甘蔗产量及氮肥、磷肥利用率的影响. 西南农业学报, 2012, 15(1):198-202. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2012.01.048.
XIE R L, TAN H W, ZHOU L Q, HUANG J S, HUANG M F, HUAGN X H, DONG W B, WANG L. Effect of N fertilizer and P fertilizer amount on fertilizer use efficiency in sugarcane yield. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 15(1):198-202. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2012.01.048. (in Chinese)
[30] HAWKESFORD M, HORST W, KICHEY T, LAMBERS H, SCHJOERRING J, MOLLER I S, WHITE P. Function of macronutrients. MARSCHNER P. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. London, UK: Elseiver, 2012: 135-189.
[31] KINGSTON G. Mineral nutrition of sugarcane//MOORE P H, BOTHA F C. Sugarcane Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology. New York: Wiley, 2014: 85-120.
[32] DEVI T C, BHARATHALAKSHMI M, KUMARI M B G S, NAIDU N V. Effect of sources and levels of phosphorus with zinc on yield and quality of sugarcane. Sugar Tech, 2012, 14(2):195-198.DOI: 10.1007/s12355-012-0144-2.
doi: 10.1007/s12355-012-0144-2
[33] ALVARADO J S, MCCRAY J M, ERICKSON J E, SANDHU H S, BHADHA J H. Sugarcane biomass yield response to phosphorus fertilizer on four mineral soils as related to extractable soil phosphorus. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 2019, 50(22):2960-2970. DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1689260.
[34] DOS SANTOS V R, SOLTANGHEISI A, JUNQUEIRA F H C, KOLLN O, VITTI A C, DOS SANTOS D C T, PAVINATO P S. Phosphate sources and their placement affecting soil phosphorus pools in sugarcane. Agronomy-Basel, 2018, 8(12):283. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8120283
[35] OMOLLO J O, ABAYO G O. Effects of phosphorus sources and rates on sugarcane yield and quality in kibos, Nyando sugar zone. Innovations as key to the Green Revolution in Africa, 2011: 533-537. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2543-2_55.
[36] 冯媛媛, 申艳, 徐明岗, 田应兵, 任凤铃, 段英华. 施磷量与小麦产量的关系及其对土壤、气候因素的响应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(4):683-691. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.18171.
FENG Y Y, SHEN Y, XU M G, TIAN Y B, REN F L, DUAN Y H. Relationship between phosphorus application amount and grain yield of wheat and its response to soil and climate factors. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(4):683-691. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.18171. (in Chinese)
[37] JIMMY W R A, CLAUDIA C C A, EDUARDO A M, GERSON L D, LEANDRO S DA S. Phosphorus fertilization and lime application and its effect on sugarcane growth, yield and borer attack in sugarcane. Centro Agricola, 2016, 43(1):36-43.
[38] GUSTAVO C, RENATO DE M P, CID N S C, LEANDRO R M, RICARDO de L V, JOÃO M P J. Response of sugarcane in a red ultisol to phosphorus rates, phosphorus sources, and filter cake. The Scientific World Journal, 2015: 405970. DOI: 10.1155/2015/405970.
[39] AMIN S, VALDEVAN R dos S, HENRIQUE C J F, ORIEL K, ANDRÉ C V, CARLOS T DOS S D, WILFRAND F B H, MARCOS R, THAIS DEM S, PAUL J A W, Phosphate sources and filter cake amendment affecting sugarcane yield and soil phosphorus fractions. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 2019: 43. DOI: 10.1590/18069657rbcs20180227.
[40] 展晓莹, 任意, 张淑香, 康日峰. 中国主要土壤有效磷演变及其与磷平衡的响应关系. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(23):4728-4737. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.23.014.
ZHAN X Y, REN Y, ZHANG S X, KANG R F. Changes in Olsen phosphorus concentration and its response to phosphorus balance in the main types of soil in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(23):4728-4737. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.23.014.(in Chinese)
[41] 吕真真, 刘秀梅, 侯红乾, 翼建华, 蓝贤瑾, 冯兆滨, 刘益仁. 长期不同施肥对红壤性水稻土磷素及水稻磷营养的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报 2019, 25(8):1316-1324. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.18340.
LÜ Z Z, LIU X M, HOU H Q, YI J H, LAN X J, FENG Z B, LIU Y R. Effects of long-term fertilizations on soil phosphorus and its supply to rice in red paddy soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(8):1316-1324. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.18340.(in Chinese)
[42] 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 周兴, 谢坚, 杨曾平. 长期施肥红壤性水稻土壤磷素演变特征及对磷盈亏的响应. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(6):1471-1485. DOI: 10.11766/trxb201703210020.
LU Y H, LIAO Y L, NIE J, ZHOU X, XIE J, YANG Z P. Evolution of soil phosphorus in reddish paddy soil under long-term fertilization varying in formulation and its response to P balance. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(6):1471-1485. DOI: 10.11766/trxb201703210020.
[43] 俄胜哲, 杨志奇, 曾希柏, 王亚男, 罗照霞, 袁金华, 车宗贤. 长期施肥黄绵土有效磷含量演变及其与磷素平衡和作物产量的关系. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(11):3589-3598.
E S Z, YANG Z Q, ZENG X B, WANG Y N, LUO Z X, YUAN J H, ZHE Z X. Soil Olsen-P content changing trend and its relationship with phosphorus surplus and crop yield under long-term fertilization in loessial soil region on the Loess Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(11):3589-3598. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201711.037. (in Chinese)
[44] 叶会财, 李大明, 黄庆海, 柳开楼, 余喜初, 徐小林, 周利军, 胡惠文, 王赛莲. 长期不同施肥模式红壤性水稻土磷素变化. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(6):1521-1528. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0618.
YE H C, LI D M, HUANG Q H, LIU K L, YU X C, XU X L, ZHOU L J, HU H W, WANG S L. Variation of soil phosphorus under long-term fertilization in red paddy soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2015, 21(6):1521-1528. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0618. (in Chinese)
[45] 张少民, 郝明德, 柳燕兰. 黄土区长期施用磷肥对冬小麦产量、吸氮特性及土壤肥力的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35(7):159-163.
ZHANG S M, HAO M D, LIU Y L. Effects of long-term application of P fertilizer on the yield of winter wheat and characteristic of N absorption and soil fertility in dry-land of Loess Plateau. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 2007, 35(7):159-163. (in Chinese)
[46] 鲁如坤, 时正元, 施建平. 我国南方6 省农田养分平衡现状评价和动态变化研究. 中国农业科学, 2000, 33(2):63-67.
LU R K, SHI Z Y, SHI J P. Nutrient balance of agroecosystem in six provinces in southern China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2000, 33(2):63-67. (in Chinese)
[47] 谢如林, 黄献华, 谭宏伟, 周柳强, 黄美福, 黄金生, 董文斌. 蔗园土壤速效磷丰缺临界值的研究. 热带作物学报, 2009, 30(3):304-308.
XIE R L, HUANG X H, TAN H W, ZHOU L Q, HUAGN M F, HUANG J S, DOGN W B. Critical level of soil available P in sugarcane grove. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2009, 30(3):304-308. (in Chinese)
[48] 赵靓, 侯振安, 李水仙, 刘立鹏, 黄婷, 张扬. 磷肥用量对土壤速效磷及玉米产量和养分吸收的影响. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(2):123-128. DOI: 10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.
ZHAO L, HOU Z A, LI S X, LIU L P, HUAGN T, ZHANG Y. Effects of P rate on soil available P, yield and nutrient uptake of maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2014, 22(2):123-128. DOI: 10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science. (in Chinese)
[49] 王兴仁, 曹一平, 张福锁, 陈新平. 磷肥恒量监控施肥法在农业中应用探讨. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1995, 1(3/4):59-64.
WANG X R, CAO Y P, ZHAGN F S, CHEN X P. Feasibility of a fertilization method for keeping constant application rate of phosphorus by monitoring avaliable phosphorus in the soil. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Sciences, 1995, 1(3/4):59-64. (in Chinese)
[1] LIU Miao,LIU PengZhao,SHI ZuJiao,WANG XiaoLi,WANG Rui,LI Jun. Critical Nitrogen Dilution Curve and Nitrogen Nutrition Diagnosis of Summer Maize Under Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 932-947.
[2] DU JinXia,LI YiSha,LI MeiLin,CHEN WenHan,ZHANG MuQing. Evaluation of Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in Different Sugarcane Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130.
[3] LI Hao,WEI BenHui,HUANG JinLing,LI ZhiGang,WANG LingQiang,LIANG XiaoYing,LI SuLi. Effects of Fenlong Cultivation on Root Cell Structure and Enzyme of Respiratory Metabolic of Sugarcane [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(3): 522-532.
[4] REN JiaXin,LIU Jing,CHEN XuanJing,ZHANG YueQiang,ZHANG Yong,WANG Jie,SHI XiaoJun. Variation of Available Phosphorus in Purple Soil and Its Effects on Crop Yield of Rice-Wheat Rotation Under Long-Term Fertilizations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4601-4610.
[5] ZHUANG XinBo,CHEN YinJi,ZHOU GuangHong. The Mechanism of Myofibrillar Protein Gel Functionality Influenced by Modified Sugarcane Dietary Fiber [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3320-3330.
[6] WANG XuanXuan,LIU ChunYu,XIE BeiYu,ZHANG ShuShu,WANG DanYang,ZHU ZhenYuan. Extraction Technology, Preliminary Structure and α-glucosidase Inhibition of Polysaccharide with Alkaline-Extracted from Sugarcane Peel [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12): 2653-2665.
[7] ZHOU YiFan,YANG LinSheng,MENG Bo,ZHAN Jian,DENG Yan. Analysis of Yield Gaps and Limiting Factors in China’s Main Sugarcane Production Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2377-2388.
[8] OU HuiPing,ZHOU LiuQiang,HUANG JinSheng,XIE RuLin,ZHU XiaoHui,PENG JiaYu,ZENG Yan,MO ZongBiao,TAN HongWei,YE ShengQin. Change of Phosphorus in Lateritic Red Soil and Its Effect on Sugarcane Yield and Phosphorus Loss in Runoff Under 11-Year Continuous Application of Excessive Phosphorus Fertilizer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(22): 4623-4633.
[9] KunKun WANG,ShiPeng LIAO,Tao REN,XiaoKun LI,RiHuan CONG,JianWei LU. Effect of Continuous Straw Returning on Soil Phosphorus Availability and Crop Phosphorus Utilization Efficiency of Oilseed Rape-Rice Rotation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 94-104.
[10] ZHAO Yong,ZHAO PeiFang,HU Xin,ZHAO Jun,ZAN FengGang,YAO Li,ZHAO LiPing,YANG Kun,QIN Wei,XIA HongMing,LIU JiaYong. Evaluation of 317 Sugarcane Germplasm Based on Agronomic Traits Rating Data [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(4): 602-615.
[11] LI DongChu,WANG BoRen,HUANG Jing,ZHANG YangZhu,XU MingGang,ZHANG ShuXiang,ZHANG HuiMin. Change of Phosphorus in Red Soil and Its Effect to Grain Yield Under Long-Term Different Fertilizations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(21): 3830-3841.
[12] YunPeng HOU,LiChun WANG,Qian LI,CaiXia YIN,YuBo QIN,Meng WANG,YongJun WANG,LiLi KONG. Research on Optimum Phosphorus Fertilizer Rate Based on Maize Yield and Phosphorus Balance in Soil Under Film Mulched Drip Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(20): 3573-3584.
[13] ZHANG Xu,LING Hui,LIU Feng,HUANG Ning,WANG Ling,MAO HuaYing,LI CongNa,TANG HanChen,SU WeiHua,SU YaChun,QUE YouXiong. Cloning and Expression Analysis of a Ⅱd Sub-Group WRKY Transcription Factor Gene from Sugarcane [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(23): 4409-4423.
[14] HuiPing OU, LiuQiang ZHOU, JinSheng HUANG, Yan ZENG, XiaoHui ZHU, RuLin XIE, HongWei TAN, BiYan HUANG. Effects of Long-Term Different Fertilization on Sugarcane Yield Stability, Fertilizer Contribution Rate and Nutrition Loss [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(10): 1931-1939.
[15] LI XuJuan, ZI QiuYan, LI ChunJia, LIU HongBo, LIN XiuQin, XU ChaoHua, LU Xin, MAO Jun, LIU XinLong. Cloning and Expression Analysis of TAD1 (ScTAD1) in Sugarcane [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(9): 1571-1581.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!