基于农艺性状分级对317份甘蔗种质资源的评价

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.04.003

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Evaluation of sugarcane germplasm via rapid rating their important agronomic traits could provide reference for their further evaluation hybridization.【Method】Based on the field experiment, 317 sugarcane germplasm resources (2 replicates) were rated and evaluated by selecting five important agronomic traits at maturity stage, which were plant height, stalk diameter, millable stalks, leaf disease degree (comprehensive reflection of natural leaf diseases such as mosaic, rust, brown stripe disease) and general vigor. Each trait was divided into five grades, in which plant height was highest in grade 1, and the shortest in grade 5; similarly, stalk diameter was thickest in grade 1 and finest in grade 5; millable stalk was the most in grade 1 and the least in grade 5; general vigor was the best in grade 1 and the worst in grade 5; leaf diseases were the best in grade 1 and the worst in grade 5. The rating of each trait was accomplished by the members of the rating group. Based on the rating data of agronomic traits, 317 germplasm resources were comprehensively evaluated by statistical methods such as variance, broad-sense heritability, principal component analysis, clustering and discriminant analysis, and the germplasm resources with excellent agronomic traits were screened. Further, the sucrose content of the selected excellent germplasm was evaluated by primary rotation.【Result】The results of variance and broad-sense heritability analysis showed significant differences among 317 sugarcane germplasm in the classification data of agronomic traits (P<0.01) and the broad-sense heritability ranged from 0.61 to 0.72. The stalk diameter performed the highest broad-sense heritability (0.72) and the plant height performed the lowest (0.61). The results of principal component analysis showed that the five agronomic traits could be simplified to one principal component factor, i.e. the comprehensive superposition of five agronomic traits. The information provided by the principal component accounted for 63.57% of the total information, and the characteristic roots were significantly higher than the sum of the characteristic roots of other principal components. Based on the results of principal component analysis, 317 germplasms were classified into five categories, including 20 in the first category, 97 in the second category, 82 in the third category, 80 in the fourth category and 38 in the fifth category. 117 germplasm in the first and the second categories were the best in agronomic traits (36.91% of the total germplasms). The stepwise discriminant analysis of clustering results showed that the average probability of pairing is 95.85%. The clustering results fully reflected the actual performance of germplasm in field experiments. Based on cluster analysis of agronomic traits, the sucrose content of 117 germplasm in Class I and Class II was evaluated. The results showed that the average sucrose content of 117 germplasms ranged from 5.0% to 17.10% from November to next March, the highest was YZ09-1601 (17.1%) and the lowest was CP79-318 (5.0%). There were 43 germplasm with an average sugar content of more than 15.0%, of which 11 were more than 16.0%.【Conclusion】Plant height, stalk diameter, millable stalks, leaf disease and general vigor are important agronomic traits reflecting the field performance of sugarcane germplasm resources. The rapid classification method based on important agronomic traits is a promising alternative for evaluating large number of sugarcane germplasm resources.

Key words: sugarcane, germplasm, rating data, broad sense heritability, principal component analysis, cluster analysis

ZHAO Yong,ZHAO PeiFang,HU Xin,ZHAO Jun,ZAN FengGang,YAO Li,ZHAO LiPing,YANG Kun,QIN Wei,XIA HongMing,LIU JiaYong. Evaluation of 317 Sugarcane Germplasm Based on Agronomic Traits Rating Data[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(4): 602-615.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.04.003

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2019/V52/I4/602

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 1

Table 6

Table 7

Primary traits grades of the excellent germplasm resources and sugar content (average)"

种质资源 Germplasm	级别 Grade	总体生势 General vigor	茎径 Stalk diameter	有效茎 Millable stalks	叶部病害 Leaf disease	株高 Plant height	甘蔗糖分 Sugar content (%)
CP73-2109*	1	2.0	2.5	2.5	2.0	1.0	12.2
F170*	1	1.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	1.5	13.3
FR93-761*	1	2.0	2.0	2.0	1.5	1.0	14.0
PHil60-19*	1	2.0	2.0	2.0	1.5	1.5	12.2
Q124*	1	1.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	1.5	15.1
Q172*	1	2.0	1.5	1.5	2.0	1.0	14.3
Q179*	1	1.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	1.0	15.1
Q189*	1	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	1.0	14.6
Q197*	1	2.0	1.5	1.5	2.0	1.0	13.9
ROC4*	1	2.0	1.5	1.5	2.5	1.5	13.8
SP80-3280*	1	1.5	2.0	2.0	2.0	1.0	14.6
HN 54-11*	1	2.0	2.5	2.5	3.0	1.0	13.9
YT00-318*	1	1.5	1.5	1.5	2.0	2.0	14.9
YT 89-240*	1	1.5	2.5	2.5	1.0	1.5	15.3
YT 93-159*	1	1.5	1.5	1.5	3.0	2.0	16.2
YZ01-1413*	1	1.5	2.0	2.0	1.5	1.5	14.2
YZ 06-160*	1	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	14.0
YZ 08-1095*	1	1.0	1.5	1.5	1.0	1.0	13.4
YZ 08-1609*	1	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	15.4
YZ 09-1028*	1	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	1.5	14.8
CO1001	2	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0	1.0	10.2
CO281	2	2.5	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	13.7
CO419	2	2.5	2.0	2.0	4.5	2.0	13.3
CP00-1301	2	3.0	2.5	2.5	1.5	3.0	14.8
CP00-2459	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	3.0	2.0	13.2
CP29-116	2	3.0	3.0	3.0	1.5	1.0	11.6
CP33-310*	2	1.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	2.5	12.4
CP34-120*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	3.5	2.0	14.3
CP40-10	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	12.1
CP44-154	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	2.0	1.5	13.1
CP51-22	2	3.5	2.5	2.5	1.5	1.0	8.0
CP73-351*	2	1.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	2.5	13.9
种质资源 Germplasm	级别 Grade	总体生势 General vigor	茎径 Stalk diameter	有效茎 Millable stalks	叶部病害 Leaf disease	株高 Plant height	甘蔗糖分 Sugar content (%)
CP77-1776	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	1.5	14.4
CP79-318	2	3.0	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	5.0
CP88-1834*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	3.0	2.5	15.4
CP88-1834*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	3.0	2.5	15.4
CP88-1884	2	2.5	2.0	2.0	3.0	2.5	15.2
CP89-1509	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	1.5	11.0
CP89-2143*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	16.3
CP92-1167*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.5	2.0	14.0
CP94-1100*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	15.5
F134*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	2.5	2.0	12.9
F146	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	4.0	2.0	14.6
F172*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	1.5	1.5	13.6
FR97-41*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	2.0	2.5	12.5
FR97-53	2	3.0	2.5	2.5	1.5	2.0	15.4
FR99-116*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	3.0	2.0	12.8
KQ01-1261	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	2.0	2.5	15.8
KQ01-1390*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	1.5	2.5	15.3
KQ99-1474	2	3.0	3.0	3.0	2.5	2.0	14.2
PHil63-17*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	2.0	2.0	12.8
PHil72-446*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	1.5	2.0	11.1
PHil72-78	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	1.5	3.0	14.6
Poj2725*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	2.0	2.0	13.6
Poj2836*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	1.5	12.2
Q121*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	3.5	2.5	16.0
Q127*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	15.8
Q152*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.5	1.5	14.8
Q183*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.5	1.5	16.0
Q188*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	3.0	1.5	15.8
Q196	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	3.0	1.5	14.7
Q199	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	3.5	1.5	13.3
Q202*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	3.5	2.0	13.9
Q206	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	2.5	15.5
RB72-454*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	2.0	1.5	13.6
RB73-5275*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	3.0	2.5	11.3
RB75-15	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	2.5	1.0	14.4
RB76-5418	2	2.5	2.0	2.0	2.5	2.0	12.1
RB83-5089	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	1.5	13.3
种质资源 Germplasm	级别 Grade	总体生势 General vigor	茎径 Stalk diameter	有效茎 Millable stalks	叶部病害 Leaf disease	株高 Plant height	甘蔗糖分 Sugar content (%)
RB84-5257	2	2.5	2.0	2.0	2.5	2.0	12.2
RB85-5156*	2	1.5	1.5	1.5	4.0	2.0	14.8
ROC16	2	2.5	2.0	2.0	1.5	2.0	15.7
ROC23*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	2.0	2.5	15.2
ROC3*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	1.5	2.0	14.3
ROC9*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	13.7
SP70-1143	2	3.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	13.1
VMC74-527	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	3.0	1.5	14.1
VMC 88-354	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	3.0	2.0	13.5
VMC 95-105	2	3.0	2.5	2.5	2.0	1.5	14.8
VMC 95-36*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	2.5	2.5	14.0
VMC 95-88*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	2.0	2.0	14.2
VMC 96-60	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	3.0	1.5	9.9
CT57-416	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	2.5	14.6
DZ03-83*	2	1.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	14.8
DZ93-88*	2	1.5	2.5	2.5	3.5	2.5	16.6
FN38	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	2.5	2.0	15.1
FN39	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	3.0	2.0	15.4
GZ81-871*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	2.5	1.5	15.1
GZ91-2*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	2.5	1.5	11.9
GZ02-70*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	2.5	2.0	16.3
GZ65-542	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	3.5	2.0	15.6
GZ75-65	2	2.5	2.0	2.0	3.0	1.0	15.9
GZ95-108*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	3.0	2.0	15.0
GT02-351*	2	2.0	2.0	2.0	3.0	3.0	15.2
GT 02-467*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	2.0	2.0	15.2
GT 11	2	2.5	2.0	2.0	2.0	1.5	15.3
GT 69-360*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	1.5	2.0	12.1
GT 84-332*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	4.5	1.5	16.0
GT 89-5*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	2.0	2.0	15.3
GT94-119	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	2.5	1.5	14.5
GT96-211*	2	1.5	2.5	2.5	3.0	2.0	14.7
GT97-69	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	3.0	2.5	14.4
LC03-1137*	2	1.5	2.5	2.5	3.0	1.5	14.9
种质资源 Germplasm	级别 Grade	总体生势 General vigor	茎径 Stalk diameter	有效茎 Millable stalks	叶部病害 Leaf disease	株高 Plant height	甘蔗糖分 Sugar content (%)
LC05-136	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	2.0	2.0	15.4
MT69-421*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	16.1
MT70-611*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	2.0	1.5	15.4
MT00-236	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	1.5	2.5	15.3
MT96-86	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	1.5	3.0	13.1
YZ06-80*	2	2.0	3.0	3.0	2.5	2.5	15.6
YZ08-2060	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	2.5	1.5	14.8
YZ09-1601*	2	1.5	2.0	2.0	4.5	2.5	17.1
YZ11-1779	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	2.0	2.0	16.4
YZ64-24*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.0	15.3
YZ65-225*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	3.5	2.5	14.3
YZ71-998*	2	2.0	2.5	2.5	3.0	2.0	16.7
YZ89-351	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	2.5	2.0	14.5
YZ89-7	2	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	1.5	15.3
YZ94-375	2	2.5	3.0	3.0	3.5	1.5	14.2

Table 7

References 39

[1]	彭绍光 . 甘蔗育种学. 北京: 农业出版社, 1984: 174-184.
	PENG S G. Sugarcane Breeding Science. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1984: 174-184. (in Chinese)
[2]	蔡青 . 甘蔗种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 1-3.
	CAI Q. Sugarcane Germplasm Resources Description Norms and Data Standards. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2006: 1-3. (in Chinese)
[3]	刘新龙, 蔡青, 吴才文, 马丽, 应雄美, 陆鑫, 范源洪 . 甘蔗品种资源的表型遗传多样性. 生物多样性, 2010,18(1):37-43.
	LIU X L, CAI Q, WU C W, MA L, YING X M, LU X, FAN Y H . Phenotypic diversity of sugarcane variety germplasm. Biodiversity, 2010,18(1):37-43. (in Chinese)
[4]	刘新龙, 马丽, 蔡青, 应雄美, 陆鑫, 苏火生, 毛钧, 范源洪 . 云南甘蔗种质表型性状的遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2010,11(6):703-708. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.37-38.1549
	LIU X L, MA L, CAI Q, YING X M, LU X, SU H S, MAO J, FAN Y H . Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits in Yunnan sugarcane germplasm. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2010,11(6):703-708. (in Chinese) doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.37-38.1549
[5]	吴建涛, 许环映, 谢静, 邱永生, 张垂明, 周峰, 刘壮, 王勤南 . 粤糖系列甘蔗亲本表型性状遗传多样性分析 . 植物遗传资源学报, 2018(4):1-17.
	WU J T, XU H Y, XIE J, QIU Y S, ZHANG C M, ZHOU F, LIU Z, WANG Q N . Genetic Diversity analysis of phenotypic characters of sugarcane parents in YT series sugarcane varieties. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2018(4):1-17. (in Chinese)
[6]	赵俊, 吴才文, 赵培方, 夏红明, 暂逢刚, 杨昆, 李复琴, 刘家勇 . 引进甘蔗种质工艺与农艺性状的相关性及聚类分析. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,38(5):476-481. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1238.2012.00476
	ZHAO J, WU C W, ZHAO P F, XIA H M, ZAN F G, YANG K, LI F Q, LIU J Y . Principal component analysis and cluster analysis of agronomic and quality traits of exotic sugarcane germplasm. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2012,38(5):476-481. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1238.2012.00476
[7]	昝逢刚, 吴才文, 赵培方, 赵俊, 夏红明, 杨昆, 姚丽, 覃伟, 刘家勇 . 国外引进甘蔗种质表型性状的遗传多样性分析. 西南农业学报, 2014,27(4):1369-1373. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2014.04.005
	ZAN F G, WU C W, ZHAO P F, ZHAO J, XIA H M, YANG K, YAO L, QIN W, LIU J Y . Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic characters of sugarcane germplasms Introduced from Foreign Countries. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014,27(4):1369-1373. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2014.04.005
[8]	徐超华, 陆鑫, 马丽, 刘新龙, 刘洪博, 苏火生, 林秀琴, 蔡青 . 斑茅种质资源的表型性状及遗传多样性. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,40(2):117-121. doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2014.02.002
	XU C H, LU X, MA L, LIU X L, LIU H B, SU H S, LIN X Q, CAI Q . Phenotypic traits and genetic diversity of Erianthus arundinaceum germplasm. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences), 2014,40(2):117-121. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2014.02.002
[9]	杨翠凤, 张春雅, 杨丽涛, 李杨瑞 . 不同基因型甘蔗种质资源的表型遗传多样性. 广西植物, 2015(4):556-563. doi: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201403017
	YANG C F, ZHANG C Y, YANG L T, LI Y R . Phenotypic genetic diversity of sugarcane germplasm resources with different genotypes. Guangxi Plants, 2015(4):556-563. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201403017
[10]	肖祎, 刘军, 周英明, 张翠苹, 陈道德, 钟萍, 吕达 . 果蔗种质资源新植表现及遗传多样性聚类分析. 甘蔗糖业, 2018(2):6-11.
	XIAO Y, LIU J, ZHOU Y M, ZHANG C P, CHEN D D, ZHONG P, LÜ D . New planting performance and genetic diversity cluster analysis in chewing cane germplasm resources. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2018(2):6-11. (in Chinese)
[11]	SINGH P, SINGH S P, TIWARI A K, SHARMA B L . Genetic diversity of sugarcane hybrid cultivars by RAPD markers. Biotech, 2017,7(3):222. doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0855-x
[12]	吴海兰, 王先宏, 何丽莲, 李富生 . 基于SSR标记的云南甘蔗栽培种质遗传多样性分析. 分子植物育种, 2014,12(1):144-151.
	WU H L, WANG X H, HE L L, LI F S . Genetic diversity analysis of Yunnan sugarcane cultivars on SSR marker. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2014,12(1):144-151. (in Chinese)
[13]	ALI A, WANG J D, PAN Y B, DENG Z H, CHEN Z W, CHEN R K, GAO S J . Molecular identification and genetic diversity analysis of Chinese sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrids) varieties using SSR markers. Tropical Plant Biology, 2017: 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12042-017-9195-6
[14]	YOU Q, XU L P, ZHENG Y F, QUE Y X . Genetic diversity analysis of sugarcane parents in Chinese breeding program using gSSR markers. The Scientific World Journal, 2013(7):613062. doi: 10.1155/2013/613062 pmid: 23990759
[15]	劳方业, 刘睿, 何慧怡, 邓海华, 陈仲华, 陈健文, 符成, 张垂明, 杨业后 . 崖城系列甘蔗亲本遗传多样性的AFLP标记分析. 分子植物育种, 2008,6(3):517-522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2008.03.017
	LAO F Y, LIU R, HE H Y, DENG H H, CHEN J W, FU C, ZHANG C M, YANG Y H . AFLP analysis of genetic diversity in Yacheng series sugarcane parents. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2008,6(3):517-522. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2008.03.017
[16]	昝逢刚, 应雄美, 吴才文, 赵培方, 陈学宽, 马丽, 苏火生, 刘家勇 . 98份甘蔗种质资源遗传多样性的AFLP分析. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(5):1002-1010. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.05.18
	ZAN F G, YING X M, WU C W, ZHAO P F, CHEN X K, MA L, SU H S, LIU J Y . Genetic diversity analysis of 98 collections of sugarcane germplasm with AFLP markers. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(5):1002-1010. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.05.18
[17]	SINGH R B, SINGH B, SINGH R K . Study of genetic diversity of sugarcane (Saccharum) species and commercial varieties through TRAP molecular markers. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2017,22(7):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s40502-016-0249-9
[18]	宋弦弦 . 甘蔗及其近缘植物遗传多样性的SRAP和TRAP标记分析[D]. 福建: 福建农林大学, 2009.
	SONG X X , Analysis of genetic diversity on sugarcane and its relatives by SRAP and TRAP markers[D]. Fujian: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2009. ( in Chinese)
[19]	CHANG D, YANG F Y, YAN J J, YAN Q W, BAI S Q, LIANG X Z, ZHANG Y W, GAN Y M . SRAP analysis of genetic diversity of nine native populations of wild sugarcane, Saccharum spontaneum, from Sichuan, China. Genetics & Molecular Research, 2012,11(2):1245-1253. doi: 10.4238/2012.May.9.3 pmid: 22614352
[20]	PADMANABHAN T S S, HEMAPRABHA G . Genetic diversity and population structure among 133 elite genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) for use as parents in sugarcane varietal improvement. Biotech, 2018,8(8):339. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1364-2
[21]	HEMAPRABHA G, GOVINDARAJ P, BALASUNDARAM N, SINGH N K . Genetic diversity analysis of Indian sugarcane breeding pool based on sugarcane specific STMS markers. Sugar Tech, 2005,7(2/3):9-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02942521
[22]	蒲光兰, 肖千文, 蔡利娟, 罗永飞, 邹雪梅 . 四川核桃种质资源坚果的数量性状变异及概率分级. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,41(6):647-650. doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2015.06.013
	PU G L, XIAO Q W, CAI L J, LUO Y F, ZOU X M . Quantitative trait variation and probability classification of nuts in Sichuan walnut germplasm resources. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2015,41(6):647-650. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2015.06.013
[23]	蔡志翔, 严娟, 沈志军, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮 . 核桃种质资源托叶长度评价与分级体系的建立. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016,17(3):461-465. doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2016.03.009
	CAI Z X, YAN J, SHEN Z J, MA R J, YU M L . Establishment of stipular length evaluation and classification system for walnut germplasm resources. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016,17(3):461-465. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2016.03.009
[24]	范净, 陈启亮, 杨晓平, 张靖国, 田瑞, 胡红菊 . 砂梨种质资源果实发育期遗传多样性分析及分级探讨. 湖北农业科学, 2017(24):4811-4812.
	FAN J, CHEN Q L, YANG X P, ZHANG J G, TIAN R, HU H J . Genetic diversity analysis and classification of sand pear germplasm resources in fruit development period. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2017(24):4811-4812. (in Chinese)
[25]	ZHAO D L, COMSTOCK J C, GLAZ B, EDME S J, GLYNN N C, DELBLANCO I A, GILBERT R A, WAYNE R, DAVIDSON D, CHEN C Y . Vigor rating and brix for first clonal selection stage of the canal point sugarcane cultivar development program. Journal of Crop Improvement, 2012,26:60-75. doi: 10.1080/15427528.2011.611926
[26]	LIU J Y, BASNAYAKE J, JACKSON P A, CHEN X K, ZHAO J, ZHAO P F, YANG L H, BAI Y D, XIA H M, ZAN F G, QIN W, YANG K, YAO L, ZHAO L P, ZHU J R, LAKSHMANAN P, ZHAO X D, FAN Y H . Growth and yield of sugarcane genotypes are strongly correlated across irrigated and rainfed environments. Field Crops Research, 2016,196:418-425. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.022
[27]	李杨瑞 . 现代甘蔗学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010: 103-109.
	LI Y R . Modern Sugarcane Science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2010: 103-109. (in Chinese)
[28]	唐仕云, 王伦旺, 杨荣仲, 李翔, 黄海荣, 经艳, 邓宇驰, 谭芳, 黄家雍, 杨丽涛 . 糖能兼用甘蔗新品系的性状遗传分析及综合选择. 中国农业大学学报, 2016,21(2):9-19. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2016.02.02
	TANG S Y, WANG L W, YANG R Z, LI X, HUANG H R, JING Y, DENG Y C, TAN F, HUANG J Y, YANG L T . Character genetic analysis and comprehensive selection of new sugarcane strains for both sugar and energy. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016,21(2):9-19. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2016.02.02
[29]	何启钧, 林彦铨, 张加明, 林德波 . 甘蔗产量性状与品质性状的相关与通径分析. 甘蔗, 1995(3):6-12.
	HE Q J, LIN Y Q, ZHANG J M, LIN D B . Correlation and path analysis between yield traits and quality traits of sugarcane. Sugarcane, 1995(3):6-12. (in Chinese)
[30]	罗赣丰, 梁小敏, 刘小全 . 江西甘蔗种质资源主要性状的变异与相关研究. 江西农业大学学报, 2007,29(6):910-916. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2007.06.014
	LUO G F, LIANG X M, LIU X Q . Variation and correlation of main characters of sugarcane germplasm resources in Jiangxi.[J] ournal of Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2007,29(6):910-916. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2007.06.014
[31]	杨荣仲, 周会, 王伦旺, 梁强, 唐仕云, 贤武, 桂意云, 经艳, 雷敬超, 邓宇驰, 段维兴 . 甘蔗家系农艺性状遗传力分析. 南方农业学报, 2016,47(3):337-342. doi: 10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2016.03.337
	YANG R Z, ZHOU H, WANG L W, LIANG Q, TANG S Y, XIAN W, GUI Y Y, JING Y, LEI J C, DENG Y C, DUAN W X . Heritability analysis of agronomic traits in sugarcane families. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2016, 47(3):337-342. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2016.03.337
[32]	张琼, 齐永文, 张垂明, 陈勇生, 邓海华 . 我国大陆甘蔗骨干亲本亲缘关系分析. 广东农业科学, 2009(10):44-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2009.10.011
	ZHANG Q, QI Y W, ZHANG C M, CHEN Y S, DENG H H . Pedigree analysis of genetic relationship among core parents of sugarcane in Mainland China. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2009(10):44-48. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2009.10.011
[33]	刘家勇, 赵培方, 杨昆, 夏红明, 吴才文, 陈学宽, 赵俊, 杨洪昌, 昝逢刚, 姚丽, 吴转娣, 赵丽萍, 覃伟 . 甘蔗新品种云蔗05-51的选育. 中国糖料, 2016,38(1):8-10. doi: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2016.01.003
	LIU J Y, ZHAO P F, YANG K, XIA H M, WU C W, CHEN X K, ZHAO JUN, YANG H C, ZAN F G, YAO L, WU Z D, ZHAO L P, QIN W . Breeding of new sugarcane variety, Yunzhe05-51. Sugar Crops of China, 2016,38(1):8-10. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2016.01.003
[34]	李奇伟, 刘福业, 陈月桂, 杨俊贤, 邓海华, 吴文龙, 潘方胤, 吴建涛, 陈勇生 . 甘蔗新品种粤糖03-393(粤糖60号)的选育与种性分析. 西南农业学报, 2012,25(2):401-407. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2012.02.010
	LI Q W, LIU F Y, CHEN Y G, YANG J X, DENG H H, WU W L, PAN F Y, WU J T, CHEN Y S . Study on breeding and characteristics analysis of new sugarcane variety Yuetang03-393(Yuetang No.60), Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012,25(2):401-407. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2012.02.010
[35]	夏红明, 赵培方, 刘家勇, 赵俊, 昝逢刚, 陈学宽, 杨昆, 杨洪昌, 姚丽, 赵丽萍, 吴转娣, 覃伟, 吴才文 . 早熟高糖甘蔗新品种云蔗08-1609的选育. 中国糖料, 2018,40(5):6-9. doi: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2018.05.002
	XIA H M, ZHAO P F, LIU J Y, ZHAO J, ZAN F G, CHEN X K, YANG K, YANG H C, YAO L, ZHAO L P, WU Z D, QIN W, WU C W . Breeding of new sugarcane variety Yunzhe081609 with early maturing and high sucrose content. Sugar Crops of China, 2018,40(5):6-9. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2018.05.002
[36]	文明富, 潘方胤, 吴文龙, 李奇伟, 齐永文, 彭立冲, 彭冬永, 杨俊贤 . 甘蔗新品种粤糖07-516选育及特性特征. 甘蔗糖业, 2017(3):1-5.
	WEN M F, PAN F Y, WU W L, LI Q W, QI Y W, PENG L C, PENG D Y, YANG J X . Breeding and characteristics of sugarcane cultivar Yuetang07-516. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2017(3):1-5. (in Chinese)
[37]	马文清, 郭强, 秦昌鲜, 黄珍玲, 闭德金, 彭崇, 施泽升, 莫周美, 唐利球 . 甘蔗主要农艺性状的遗传力和育种值估计. 研究报告, 2018, 1-16.
	MA W Q, GUO Q, QIN C X, HUANG Z L, BI D J, PENG C, SHI Z S, MO Z M, TANG L Q . Estimations of heritability and breeding values for the main agronomic traits in sugarcane. Research Report, 2018, 1-16. (in Chinese)
[38]	姚丽, 覃伟, 赵培方, 刘家勇, 赵俊, 武晋语, 吴才文 . CP系列甘蔗亲本及杂交组合育种潜力分析. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017(6):590-596. doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2017.06.003
	YAO L, QIN W, ZHAO P F, LIU J Y, ZHAO J, WU J Y, WU C W . Analysis on breeding potential of series of CP parents and their cross combinations in sugarcane. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2017(6):590-596. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2017.06.003
[39]	徐良年, 邓祖湖, 林彦铨, 陈如凯, 傅华英 . 经济遗传值在甘蔗选育种应用研究系列(三)甘蔗亲本经济育种值和家系经济遗传值分析. 中国糖料, 2013(1):5-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2624.2013.01.002
	XU L N, DENG Z H, LIN Y Q, CHEN R K, FU H Y . Series studies on economic genetic value in sugarcane(Ⅲ)parent economic breeding value and family economic genetic value analysis of sugarcane. Sugar Crops of China, 2013(1):5-8. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2624.2013.01.002

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

性状Traits	范围Range	分级Rank
株高 Plant height (cm)	≥280	1
	220—280	2
	160—220	3
	100—160	4
	≤100	5
茎径 Stalk diameter (cm)	≥3.0	1
	2.5—3.0	2
	2.0—2.5	3
	1.5—2.0	4
	≤1.5	5
有效茎 Millable stalks (条/m)	≥10	1
	8—9	2
	6—7	3
	4—5	4
	≤3	5
叶部病害程度 Leaf disease (%)	≤5	1
	5—10	2
	10—20	3
	20—30	4
	≥30	5
总体生势 General vigor	基于对性状的观察,对种质材料进行综合评价并分级 The comprehensive evaluation of the germplasms based on the observation of four traits	1
		2
		3
		4
		5

农艺性状 Agronomic traits	平均值 Averages	变异系数 Coefficient of variation (%)	遗传方差 Genetic variance	广义遗传力 Broad-sense heritability
株高Plant height	2.39**	31.01	0.34	0.61
叶部病害程度Leaf disease	2.95**	29.70	0.53	0.69
有效茎Millable stalks	3.02**	23.23	0.31	0.64
茎径Stalk diameter	2.79**	28.01	0.44	0.72
总体生势General vigor	2.91**	27.70	0.45	0.69

农艺性状 Agronomic traits	与总体生势的相关系数 Correlation coefficients with general vigor
茎径Stalk diameter	0.73**
有效茎Millable stalks	0.78**
叶部病害程度Leaf disease	0.46**
株高Plant height	0.68**

农艺指标 Agronomic traits	第一主成分 First component	第二主成分 Second component	第三主成分 Third component	第四主成分 Fourth component	第五主成分 Fifth component
总体生势（X1）General vigor	0.52	-0.26	0.02	-0.19	-0.79
茎径（X2）Stalk diameter	0.41	-0.43	0.68	0.11	0.41
有效茎（X3）Millable stalks	0.47	-0.06	-0.50	-0.57	0.45
叶部病害（X4）Leaf disease	0.36	0.86	0.35	-0.11	-0.01
株高（X5）Plant height	0.46	0.07	-0.40	0.79	0.08
百分率Percentage (%)	63.57	13.56	12.12	7.41	2.34
累计百分率Cumulative percentage (%)	63.57	77.13	90.25	97.66	100
特征根Eigenvectors	3.18	0.68	0.66	0.37	0.12
P值P value	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	1.00

类群 Groups	主成分综合得分（均值） Principal component comprehensive scores (average)	原始分级数据（均值）Primary grade data(average)
类群 Groups		总体生势 General vigor	茎径 Stalk diameter	有效茎 Millable stalks	叶部病害程度 Leaf disease	株高 Plant height
第Ⅰ类群Ⅰ group	-3.10	1.68	1.88	1.93	1.93	1.30
第Ⅱ类群Ⅱ group	-1.45	2.25	2.33	2.53	2.52	1.95
第Ⅲ类群Ⅲ group	-0.14	2.87	2.70	3.04	2.89	2.31
第Ⅳ类群Ⅳ group	1.10	3.43	3.16	3.38	3.28	2.71
第Ⅴ类群Ⅴ group	3.31	4.26	3.86	4.04	4.03	3.63

Evaluation of 317 Sugarcane Germplasm Based on Agronomic Traits Rating Data

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 39

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

来自\判为 Come\Go	第Ⅰ类群 Ⅰ group	第Ⅱ类群 Ⅱ group	第Ⅲ类群 Ⅲ group	第Ⅳ类群 Ⅳ group	第Ⅴ类群 Ⅴ group	小计（份） Total (piece)	正确率 Accuracy (%)
第Ⅰ类群Ⅰ group	18	2	0	0	0	20	90.00
第Ⅱ类群Ⅱ group	0	92	5	0	0	97	94.85
第Ⅲ类群Ⅲ group	0	0	82	0	0	82	100.00
第Ⅳ类群Ⅳ group	0	0	5	75	0	80	93.73
第Ⅴ类群Ⅴ group	0	0	0	2	36	38	94.76
平均判对概率 Average accuracy	95.85

[1]	SONG SongQuan,LIU Jun,TANG CuiFang,CHENG HongYan,WANG WeiQing,ZHANG Qi,ZHANG WenHu,GAO JiaDong. Research Progress on the Physiology and Its Molecular Mechanism of Seed Desiccation Tolerance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1047-1063.
[2]	WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[3]	DU JinXia,LI YiSha,LI MeiLin,CHEN WenHan,ZHANG MuQing. Evaluation of Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in Different Sugarcane Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130.
[4]	DUAN CanXing,CAO YanYong,DONG HuaiYu,XIA YuSheng,LI Hong,HU QingYu,YANG ZhiHuan,WANG XiaoMing. Precise Characterization of Maize Germplasm for Resistance to Pythium Stalk Rot and Gibberella Stalk Rot [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 265-279.
[5]	YingLing WAN,MengTing ZHU,AiQing LIU,YiJia JIN,Yan LIU. Phenotypic Diversity Analysis of Chinese Ornamental Herbaceous Peonies and Its Germplasm Resource Evaluation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3629-3639.
[6]	CHEN XueSen,WANG Nan,ZHANG ZongYing,MAO ZhiQuan,YIN ChengMiao. Understanding and Thinking About Some Problems of Fruit Tree Germplasm Resources and Genetic Breeding [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3395-3410.
[7]	YANG Cheng,GONG GuiZhi,PENG ZhuChun,CHANG ZhenZhen,YI Xuan,HONG QiBin. Genetic Relationship Among Citrus and Its Relatives as Revealed by cpInDel and cpSSR Marker [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3210-3223.
[8]	SHEN ZhiJun, TIAN Yu, CAI ZhiXiang, XU ZiYuan, YAN Juan, SUN Meng, MA RuiJuan, YU MingLiang. Evaluation of Brown Rot Resistance in Peach Based on Genetic Resources Conserved in National Germplasm Repository of Peach in Nanjing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 3018-3028.
[9]	XU Xiao,REN GenZeng,ZHAO XinRui,CHANG JinHua,CUI JiangHui. Accurate Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation of Panicle Phenotypic Traits of Landraces and Cultivars of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
[10]	ZHONG YanPing,SHI LiSong,ZHOU Rong,GAO Yuan,HE YanQing,FANG Sheng,ZHANG XiuRong,WANG LinHai,WU ZiMing,ZHANG YanXin. Establishment of High Efficient Extraction and Detection Technology of Sesamin and Screening of High Sesamin Germplasm [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2109-2120.
[11]	NIE XingHua, ZHENG RuiJie, ZHAO YongLian, CAO QingQin, QIN Ling, XING Yu. Genetic Diversity Evaluation of Castanea in China Based on Fluorescently Labeled SSR [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1739-1750.
[12]	DongFeng QIU,PingJuan GE,Gang LIU,JinSong YANG,JianGuo CHEN,ZaiJun ZHANG. Breeding and Evaluation of Elite Rice Line ZY56 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1081-1091.
[13]	PeiPei ZHU,YiJia LUO,Wen XIANG,MingLei ZHANG,JianXia ZHANG. Rescue and Molecular Marker Assisted-Selection of the Cold-Resistant Seedless Grape Hybrid Embryo [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1218-1228.
[14]	LI KaiFeng,YIN YuHe,WANG Qiong,LIN TuanRong,GUO HuaChun. Correlation Analysis of Volatile Flavor Components and Metabolites Among Potato Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 792-803.
[15]	LI Hao,WEI BenHui,HUANG JinLing,LI ZhiGang,WANG LingQiang,LIANG XiaoYing,LI SuLi. Effects of Fenlong Cultivation on Root Cell Structure and Enzyme of Respiratory Metabolic of Sugarcane [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(3): 522-532.