Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 1243-1257.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.06.014

• FOOD SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of Rice Eating Quality and Optimization of Varieties of Southwest Indica Hybrid Rice Based on Three Taste Evaluation Methods

Hui LU1(),YuJie YUAN1,SiQi ZHANG1,Hong CHEN1,Duo CHEN1,XiaoYuan ZHONG1,Bo LI1,Fei DENG1,Yong CHEN1,GuiYong LI2,WanJun REN1()   

  1. 1Sichuan Agricultural University/Crop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Wenjiang 611130, Sichuan
    2Institute of Food Crops of Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650200
  • Received:2020-06-30 Accepted:2020-09-03 Online:2021-03-16 Published:2021-03-25
  • Contact: WanJun REN E-mail:luhui@stu.sicau.edu.cn;rwjun@126.com

Abstract:

【Objective】 Based on the three existing taste evaluation methods, the aim of this study was to research the eating quality characteristics of different indica hybrid rice varieties, and to select the excellent taste indica hybrid rice varieties in Southwest China. 【Method】 Based on the variety screening test in 2017, a single-factor randomized block field experiment was conducted in Yongsheng and Dayi in 2018. The eating quality was evaluated by two national standard sensory evaluation methods and taste analyzer for comparing the response of indica hybrid rice to sensory evaluation method, and the differences were compared among the 20 rice varieties. 【Result】 The eating quality of rice was regulated by multiple factors, the varieties with good taste had common characteristics, including excellent aroma, appearance, palatability, flavor and cold rice texture under the two sensory evaluations, as well as the appearance and taste value under the taste analyzer evaluation, and consequently to better eating quality. The path analysis showed that palatability had the highest contribution, followed by flavor and appearance, and the cold rice texture was the lowest. There were obvious differences in the eating quality of rice among different varieties. Under the three evaluation methods, Yixiangyou 2115, Nei 5 you 39, Fanyou 609, Huaxiangyou 1618, Chuanyou 6203 and Longliangyou 1146 all had excellent eating quality at 2 eco-points. Compared with Lüyou 4923 and Chuanyou 8377, Yixiangyou 2115 and Huaxiangyou 1618 had higher aroma, appearance, palatability, flavor, and consequently to higher eating quality. There were differences in the response of varieties to different evaluation method. Yuxiang 203 at Yongsheng and Y Liangyou 1 hao at Dayi belonged to poor taste varieties under 2 sensory evaluations, whereas both of them significantly higher than average under the evaluation of taste analyzer. The linear fitting results showed that the sensory hundred percentage point system (SHP) and the comprehensive grade rating (CGR) had a high linear fit, the correlation coefficient was r=0.94***, the correlation coefficients of the taste analyzer value (TAV) to SHP and CGR were r=0.49 *** or r=0.53 ***, respectively, and the degree of dispersion was too large to fully explain the internal relationship between each other. 【Conclusion】 The eating quality of rice was affected by ecological conditions and varieties. However, using a single taste evaluation method could not accurately evaluate the eating quality of rice varieties. Therefore, 6 varieties with good and stable taste, including Yixiangyou 2115, Nei 5 you 39, Fanyou 609, Huaxiangyou 1618, Chuanyou 6203 and Longliangyou1146, were selected by comprehensive used of the three current taste evaluation methods, which could be promoted as the high-quality taste varieties in Southwest China.

Key words: rice, eating quality, evaluation method, taste analyzer, sensory evaluation

Fig. 1

Meteorological data of Yongsheng County and Dayi County in 2018 DY: Dayi County, Sichuan Province, YS: Yongsheng County, Yunnan Province. The same as below"

Table 1

Variety information and rice quality grade of the tested Hybrid Indica Rice"

品种
Variety
亲本
Parent
米质
Rice quality grade
品种
Variety
亲本
Parent
米质
Rice quality grade
宜香4245
Yixiang 4245
宜香1A×宜恢4245
Yixiang 1A×Yihui 4245
三级
Grade Ⅲ
花香优1618
Huaxiangyou 1618
花香A×川恢1618
Huaxiang A×Chuanhui 1618
三级
Grade Ⅲ
内5优39
Nei 5 you 39
内香5A×内恢2539
Neixiang 5 A×Neihui2539
二级
Grade Ⅱ
绿优4923
Lüyou 4923
绿5 DF 1A×绿恢 4923
Lü5DF1 A×Lühui 4923
三级
Grade Ⅲ
Y两优1号
Y liangyou 1 hao
Y58S×9311
Y58S×9311
三级
Grade Ⅲ
中优295
Zhongyou 295
中9A×禾恢295
Zhong 9 A×Hehui 295
三级
Grade Ⅲ
川优6203
Chuanyou 6203
川106A×成恢3203
Chuan 106 A×Chenghui3203
二级
Grade Ⅱ
隆两优1146
Longliangyou 1146
隆科638S×华恢1146
Longke 638 S×Huahui 1146
三级
Grade Ⅲ
晶两优534
Jingliangyou 534
晶4155S×R534
Jing 4155S×R534
三级
Grade Ⅲ
F优498
F you 498
江育F32A×蜀恢498
Jiangyu F 32 A×Shuhui 498
三级
Grade Ⅲ
旌优127
Jingyou 127
旌香1A×成恢727
Jingxiang 1 A×Chenghui 727
二级
Grade Ⅱ
中9优2号
Zhong 9 you2 hao
中9A×红恢2号
Zhong 9 A×Honghui 2 hao
三级
Grade Ⅲ
渝香203
Yuxiang 203
宜香1A×渝恢2103
Yixiang 1 A×Yuhui2103
二级
Grade Ⅱ
蜀优217
Shuyou 217
蜀21A×成恢727
Shu 21 A×Chenghui 727
——
繁优609
Fanyou 609
繁源A×帮恢609
Fanyuan A×Banghui 609
二级
Grade Ⅱ
宜香优2115
Yixiangyou 2115
宜香1A×雅恢2115
Yixiang 1 A×Yahui 2115
二级
Grade Ⅱ
C两优华占
Cliangyouhuazhan
C815S×华占
C815S×Huazhan
三级
Grade Ⅲ
川优8377
Chuanyou 8377
川358A×成恢377
Chuan 358 A×Chenghui 377
一级
Grade Ⅰ
天优华占
Tianyouhuazhan
天丰A×华占
Tianfeng A×Huazhan
三级
Grade Ⅲ
渝优7109
Yuyou 7109
渝802A×渝恢7109
Yu 802A×Yuhui 7109
三级
Grade Ⅲ

Table 2

The difference analysis of rice eating quality and taste index based on sensory hundred percentage point system"

品种
Variety
气味
Aroma
外观
Appearance
适口性
Palatability
滋味
Flavor
冷饭质地
Cold rice texture
感官百分制评分
SHP
永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY
宜香4245
Yixiang 4245
18.37bc 17.76b 16.57bcde 14.01ef 23.24bcde 21.66b 19.61abc 19.15bcde 3.74def 3.75cdef 81.52bc 76.55def
内5优39
Nei 5 you 39
17.42ghij 17.01cdef 16.98abc 14.24def 23.37bcd 21.52b 19.44bc 19.04bcde 3.97bcd 3.86bcd 81.19bcde 75.95defg
Y两优1号
Y liangyou 1 hao
17.30hijk 16.48f 15.79fgh 12.46g 22.48defg 21.57b 19.07bc 18.13f 3.67defg 3.79bcdef 78.35fg 72.65h
川优6203
Chuanyou 6203
17.83defg 16.97def 16.28def 15.34bcd 23.20bcdef 22.44b 19.61abc 19.03bcde 3.63defg 4.1abc 80.63cde 78.1bcde
晶两优534
Jingliangyou 534
17.51fghij 16.84ef 16.62bcd 13.85f 23.68abc 21.84b 19.85ab 18.54def 3.75def 3.78bcdef 81.23bcd 75.2fg
旌优127
Jingyou 127
18.03cde 17.75b 16.38cdef 14.38def 22.86cdefg 21.66b 19.75abc 18.93bcdef 3.62defg 3.72cdefg 80.43cde 76.41def
渝香203
Yuxiang 203
16.84k 17.48bcde 14.32j 14.57cdef 20.19i 21.78b 18.87cd 19.13bcde 3.82cdef 3.83bcde 73.68i 77.16cdef
繁优609
Fanyou 609
18.19cd 17.65bcd 17.17ab 16.35b 23.35bcde 21.71b 20.32a 19.64abc 3.91bcde 3.92bc 82.6b 79.57bc
C两优华占
C liangyouhuazhan
17.25ijk 17.15bcdef 15.18hi 14.78cdef 22.93cdefg 21.69b 19.58abc 18.85cdef 3.75def 3.85bcde 78.67fg 76.38def
天优华占
Tianyouhuazhan
17.51fghij 16.87ef 15.87fg 15.01cdef 22.77cdefg 20.97b 19.54abc 18.51def 3.42fgh 3.24hi 78.95fg 75.27fg
花香优1618
Huaxiangyou 1618
18.65ab 18.39a 17.57a 13.85f 24.11ab 21.29b 20.35a 19.15bcde 4.38a 4.18ab 85.27a 77.09cdef
绿优4923
Lüyou 4923
17.26ijk 17.04cdef 14.42j 12.76g 22.18fg 21.81b 18.19d 18.32ef 3.17hi 3.44efghi 75.12h 73.44gh
中优295
Zhongyou 295
17.93cdef 17.42bcde 16.25def 15.70bc 23.14bcdefg 22.15b 19.23bc 18.59def 3.31ghi 3.08i 79.69ef 77.11cdef
隆两优1146
Longliangyou 1146
17.55efghij 18.89a 16.63bcd 18.09a 23.39bcd 24.79a 19.79ab 20.11a 4.18abc 4.44a 81.79bc 86.2a
F优498
F you498
17.46fghij 17.21bcde 15.92efg 15.09cde 22.46defg 21.57b 19.45bc 18.75def 3.51efgh 3.33ghi 78.84fg 75.99defg
中9优2号
Zhong 9 you2 hao
17.68efghi 17.58bcd 14.61ij 15.75bc 22.12g 22.44b 19.41bc 19.14bcde 3.51efgh 3.51defgh 77.59g 78.47bcd
蜀优217
Shuyou 217
17.78defgh 17.57bcd 15.99defg 17.63a 22.64cdefg 22.31b 19.58abc 19.19bcd 3.68defg 3.44efghi 79.74def 77.45cdef
宜香优2115
Yixiangyou 2115
18.93a 18.46a 17.22ab 14.99cdef 24.59a 22.73b 20.37a 19.72ab 4.24ab 4.18ab 85.47a 80.28b
川优8377
Chuanyou 8377
17.15jk 17.68bc 14.09j 14.14ef 21.21h 21.68b 18.98bc 19.17bcde 2.97i 3.20hi 74.71hi 76.07def
渝优7109
Yuyou 7109
17.66efghi 17.69bc 15.57gh 13.95ef 22.31efg 21.95b 19.31bc 18.67def 3.75def 3.39fghi 78.66fg 75.66efg
均值 Mean 17.71A 17.50B 15.97A 14.85B 22.81A 21.98B 19.51A 18.99B 3.70A 3.70A 79.71A 77.05B
变幅Range 16.84-18.93 16.48-18.89 14.09-17.57 12.46-18.09 20.19-24.59 20.97-24.79 18.19-20.37 18.13-20.11 2.97-4.38 3.08-4.44 73.68-85.47 72.65-86.2
CV (%) 2.93 3.39 6.34 9.42 4.25 3.55 2.67 2.51 9.28 9.89 3.84 3.64
双因素方差分析的 P 值 P values of two-ways ANOVA
生态点Location 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.94 0.000***
品种Variety 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000***
生态点×品种
Location × Variety
0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.058 0.191 0.000***

Table 3

The difference analysis of rice eating quality and taste index based on comprehensive grade rating"

品种
Variety
气味
Aroma
外观
Appearance
适口性
Palatability
滋味
Flavor
冷饭质地
Cold rice texture
等级综合评分
Comprehensive grade rating
永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY
宜香4245
Yixiang 4245
0.74abc 0.61ab 0.61bcd -0.97i 0.61abcd 0.27bcd 0.45bcd 0.22bcde 0.85abc 0.75abcd 1.14bcd 0.19bcde
内5优39
Nei 5 you 39
0.11fgh -0.05efghi 0.61bcd -0.77hi 0.76abc 0.31bcd 0.39bcd 0.26bcd 1.04a 0.85abc 0.78cdef 0.08bcde
Y两优1号
Y liangyou 1 hao
-0.04fgh -0.18ghi -0.01f -1.41j 0.60adcd 0.31bcd 0.12de -0.28def 0.79abc 0.62bcde 0.28efgh -0.95f
川优6203
Chuanyou 6203
0.61bcde 0.21cdef 0.33de -0.04cde 0.44bcde 0.56abc 0.42bcd 0.37bcd 0.66abcd 0.86abc 0.70cdef 0.49bcd
晶两优534
Jingliangyou 534
0.18efgh 0.10defgh 0.55bcd -0.84hi 0.79abc 0.39bcd 0.64b 0.11cdef 0.81abc 0.89abc 1.01bcde -0.31cdef
旌优127
Jingyou 127
0.39cdef 0.44bcd 0.55bcd -0.52fgh 0.52abcd 0.08bcd 0.54bc 0.21bcde 0.75abcd 0.50bcdef 0.79cdef 0.06bcde
渝香203
Yuxiang 203
-0.22h 0.22cde -0.65g -0.54fgh -0.46fg 0.59ab 0.11de 0.44abc 0.88ab 0.89abc -0.74i 0.26bcde
繁优609
Fanyou 609
0.64bcd 0.52abc 0.81ab 0.38b 0.68abcd 0.48bc 0.70b 0.87a 0.91ab 0.82abc 1.36abc 0.87b
C两优华占
C liangyouhuazhan
0.08fgh 0.17cdefg 0.04ef -0.38efg 0.49bcd 0.17bcd 0.34bcde 0.24bcd 0.75abcd 0.8abc 0.55defg 0.09bcde
天优华占
Tianyouhuazhan
0.22defgh 0.22cde 0.45bcd 0.25bc 0.30bcde -0.22cd 0.42bcd 0.35bcd 0.67abcd -0.03fg 0.61defg 0.37bcde
花香优1618
Huaxiangyou 1618
0.85ab 0.39bcd 1.02a -0.93i 0.84ab -0.20bcd 0.66b -0.10def 1.16a 1.04ab 1.64ab -0.39cdef
绿优4923
Lüyou 4923
-0.08gh -0.25hi -0.44g -1.31j -0.23efg -0.33d -0.43f -0.38f 0.01ef 0.12efg -0.7i -1.07f
中优295
Zhongyou 295
0.32cdefg -0.18fghi 0.55bcd 0.14bcd 0.08cdef -0.14bcd -0.02e -0.37f 0.14def -0.19g 0.23fgh -0.11bcdef
隆两优1146
Longliangyou 1146
0.08fgh 0.83a 0.41cd 1.19a 0.67abcd 1.21a 0.36bcde 0.70ab 0.88ab 1.26a 0.81cdef 1.92a
F优498
F you498
0.04fgh -0.33i 0.41cd -0.21def 0.01defg -0.33d 0.16cde -0.10def 0.22cdef 0.18efg -0.05ghi -0.61ef
中9优2号
Zhong 9 you 2 hao
0.10fgh 0.24cde -0.33g 0.09bcd 0.04def 0.17bcd 0.06de 0.43abc 0.37bcde 0.34cdefg -0.18hi 0.41bcd
蜀优217
Shuyou 217
0.20defgh -0.11efghi 0.75abc -0.19def 0.39bcde -0.15bcd 0.40bcd 0.22bcde 0.34bcdef 0.24defg 0.68cdefg -0.2cdef
宜香优2115
Yixiangyou 2115
1.14a 0.64ab 0.99a -0.65ghi 1.21a 0.33bcd 1.09a 0.47abc 1.29a 1.00ab 1.91a 0.61bc
川优8377
Chuanyou 8377
-0.06fgh -0.04efghi -0.42g -0.49fgh -0.65g -0.33d 0.06de 0.17cde -0.26f -0.01fg -0.63i -0.38cdef
渝优7109
Yuyou 7109
0.20defgh 0.17cdefg 0.37de -0.84hi 0.45bcde -0.16bcd 0.52bc -0.1def 0.66abcd 0.11efg 0.65cdefg -0.54def
均值 Mean 0.27A 0.18B 0.33A -0.40B 0.38A 0.15B 0.35A 0.19B 0.65A 0.55A 0.54A 0.04B
变幅Range -0.22-1.14 -0.33-0.83 -0.65-1.02 -1.41-1.19 -0.65-1.21 -0.33-1.21 -0.43-1.09 -0.38-0.87 -0.26-1.29 -0.19-1.26 -0.74-1.91 -1.07-1.92
CV (%) 128.76 177.41 145.65 155.25 122.15 262.45 92.92 178.25 61.03 76.57 135.07 1717.79
双因素方差分析的 P 值 P values of two-ways ANOVA
生态点Location 0.023* 0.000*** 0.002** 0.000*** 0.108 0.000***
品种Variety 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000***
生态点×品种
Location × Variety
0.000*** 0.000*** 0.004** 0.000*** 0.5 0.000***

Table 4

The difference analysis of food taste quality and taste index based on the taste analyzer"

品种
Variety
外观Appearance 口感Taste 食味计值 Taste analyzer value
永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY 永胜 YS 大邑 DY
宜香4245 Yixiang 4245 6.47hij 6.53abcd 6.27fghi 6.63abc 72.27ef 77.63abc
内5优39 Nei 5 you 39 7.63abc 6.83ab 7.30abc 6.97a 83.27a 80.37a
Y两优1号 Y liangyou 1 hao 7.10defg 5.90cdef 6.93de 6.23abcde 79.90b 76.27abc
川优6203 Chuanyou 6203 6.93efg 6.37abcde 6.77de 6.43abcd 77.13bc 77.23abc
晶两优534 Jingliangyou 534 6.40ij 5.70def 6.30fgh 5.90cde 73.57de 73.00cdef
旌优127 Jingyou 127 6.40ij 5.83cdef 6.23ghi 5.87cde 73.40de 72.10cdef
渝香203 Yuxiang 203 6.77ghi 6.70abc 6.57efg 6.80ab 76.43cd 79.47ab
繁优609 Fanyou 609 7.70ab 6.93a 7.40ab 6.80ab 82.83a 79.67ab
C两优华占 C liangyouhuazhan 6.23j 6.27abcdef 6.07hi 6.50abc 73.10e 77.20abc
天优华占 Tianyouhuazhan 7.30cde 5.97cdef 7.03cd 6.00bcde 79.50bc 71.83cdef
花香优1618 Huaxiangyou 1618 7.93a 6.23abcdef 7.60a 6.40abcd 84.73a 75.57abcd
绿优4923 Lüyou 4923 5.40k 4.47g 5.23j 4.77f 65.00g 62.07g
中优295 Zhongyou 295 6.97efg 5.60ef 6.57efg 5.47ef 76.80bc 68.43ef
隆两优1146 Longliangyou 1146 6.83fgh 5.97cdef 6.63ef 6.13abcde 77.73bc 74.47abcde
F优498 F you498 7.20def 6.27abcdef 6.83de 6.17abcde 78.43bc 74.13bcde
中9优2号 Zhong 9 you2 hao 6.50hij 6.27abcdef 6.30fgh 6.03bcde 72.93e 72.93cdef
蜀优217 Shuyou 217 6.30j 5.90cdef 5.90i 5.80cde 69.63f 70.13def
宜香优2115 Yixiangyou 2115 7.43bcd 6.70abc 7.07bcd 6.77ab 79.43bc 79.37ab
川优8377 Chuanyou 8377 5.17k 5.47f 5.10j 5.60de 63.20g 67.63f
渝优7109 Yuyou 7109 6.53hij 6.00bcedf 6.23ghi 6.13abcde 72.37ef 73.20cdef
均值 Mean 6.76A 6.10B 6.52A 6.17B 75.58A 74.14B
变幅Range 5.17-7.93 4.47-6.93 5.10-7.60 4.77-6.97 63.2-84.73 62.07-80.37
CV (%) 10.46 9.21 9.99 8.62 7.47 6.29
双因素方差分析的 P 值 P values of two-ways ANOVA
生态点Location 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.003**
品种Variety 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000***
生态点×品种Location?Variety 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000***

Table 5

The effect of food taste indexes on rice food taste under different rice eating quality evaluation methods"

影响指标
Sensory influence index
相关系数
Correlation coefficient
通径系数Path coefficient 贡献率
Contribution rate
直接作用
Direct effect
间接作用Indirect effect
Ar→T Ap→T P→T F→T C→T
感官百分制评分 Sensory hundred percentage point system
气味Aroma 0.72** 0.21 0.15 0.19 0.13 0.05 0.15
外观Appearance 0.83** 0.30 0.11 0.25 0.13 0.05 0.25
适口性Palatability 0.86** 0.38 0.10 0.19 0.12 0.06 0.33
滋味Flavor 0.82** 0.20 0.13 0.19 0.23 0.07 0.16
冷饭质地Cold rice texture 0.57** 0.15 0.07 0.10 0.16 0.09 0.08
等级综合评分 Comprehensive grade rating
气味Aroma 0.66** 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.18 -0.02 0.09
外观Appearance 0.76** 0.30 0.07 0.23 0.18 -0.01 0.23
适口性Palatability 0.83** 0.44 0.07 0.16 0.20 -0.03 0.36
滋味Flavor 0.82** 0.30 0.08 0.17 0.28 -0.02 0.25
冷饭质地Cold rice texture 0.57** -0.04 0.06 0.07 0.30 0.17 -0.02
食味计评分 Taste analyzer value
外观Appearance 0.92** -0.35 1.27 -0.32
口感Taste 0.98** 1.31 -0.34 1.28

Fig. 2

Comprehensive comparison of the taste of 20 hybrid indica rice varieties under three taste evaluation methods a, b, c represents the taste value of 20 indica rice varieties under the sensory hundred percentage point system, comprehensive grade rating, and taste analyzer value of Yongsheng eco-point varieties, respectively; d, e, f represents the taste value of 20 indica rice varieties under the sensory hundred percentage point system, comprehensive grade rating, and taste analyzer value of Dayi eco-point varieties, respectively. SHP: Sensory hundred percentage point system, CGR: Comprehensive grade rating, TAV: Taste analyzer value"

Fig. 3

Linear relationship fitting of different evaluation methods"

Fig. 4

Cluster analysis of 20 indica hybrid rice varieties under 3 eating quality evaluation methods"

[1] 高维维, 陈思平, 王丽平, 陈立凯, 郭涛, 王慧, 陈志强. 稻米蒸煮品质性状与分子标记关联研究. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(4):599-611.
GAO W W, CHEN S P, WANG L P, CHEN L K, GUO T, WANG H, CHEN Z Q. Association analysis of rice cooking quality traits with molecular markers. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(4):599-611. (in Chinese)
[2] GUO L N, CHEN W L, TAO L, HU B H, QU G L, TU B, YUAN H, MA B T, WANG Y P, ZHU X B, QIN P, LI S G. GWC1 is essential for high grain quality in rice. Plant Science, 2020,296:110497.
pmid: 32540015
[3] 徐富贤, 周兴兵, 张林, 蒋鹏, 刘茂, 朱永川, 郭晓艺, 熊洪. 四川盆地东南部气象因子对杂交中稻产量的影响. 作物学报, 2018,44(4):601-613.
XU F X, ZHOU X B, ZHANG L, JIANG P, LIU M, ZHU Y C, GUO X Y, XIONG H, Effects of climatic factors in the southeast of Sichuan basin on grain yield of mid-season hybrid rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018,44(4):601-613. (in Chinese)
[4] 段骅, 杨建昌. 高温对水稻的影响及其机制的研究进展. 中国水稻科学, 2012,26(4):393-400.
DUAN H, YANG J C. Research advances in the effect of high temperature on rice and its mechanism. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2012,26(4):393-400. (in Chinese)
[5] 刘建, 崔晶, 张欣, 丁得亮, 王松文, 边嘉宾, 李月明, 楠谷彰人. 水稻食味品尝员筛选方式的研究. 种子, 2014,33(4):75-78.
LIU J, CUI J, ZHANG X, DING D L, WANG S W, BIAN J B, LI Y M, KUSUTANI A. Study on the screening method of rice food taster. Seed, 2014,33(4):75-78. (in Chinese)
[6] LI H Y, PRAKASH S, NICHOLSON T M, FITZGERALD M A, GILBERT R. The importance of amylose and amylopectin fine structure for textural properties of cooked rice grains. Food Chemistry, 2016,196:702-711.
[7] 孙业盈, 吕彦, 董春林, 王平荣, 黄晓群, 邓晓建. 水稻Wx基因与稻米AC、GC和GT的遗传关系. 作物学报, 2005,31(5):535-539.
SUN Y Y, LÜ Y, DONG C L, WANG P R, HAUNG X Q, DENG X J. Genetic relationship among Wx gene , AC, GC and GT of rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2005,31(5):535-539. (in Chinese)
[8] 霍中洋, 李杰, 许轲, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 龚金龙, 张洪程. 高产栽培条件下种植方式对不同生育类型粳稻米质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(19):3932-3945.
HUO Z Y, LI J, XU K, DAI Q G, WEI H Y, GONG J L, ZHANG H C. Effect of planting methods on quality of different growth and development types of japonica rice under high-yielding cultivation condition. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012,45(19):3932-3945. (in Chinese)
[9] 胡蕾, 朱盈, 徐栋, 陈志峰, 胡兵强, 韩超, 裘实, 吴培, 张洪程, 魏海燕. 南方稻区优良食味与高产协同的单季晚粳稻品种特点研究. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(2):215-227.
HU L, ZHU Y, XU D, CHEN Z F, HU B Q, HAN C, QIU S, WU P, ZHANG H C, WEI H Y. Characteristics of good taste and high yield type of single cropping late japonica rice in Southern China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019,52(2):215-227. (in Chinese)
[10] 杨陶陶, 解嘉鑫, 黄山, 谭雪明, 潘晓华, 曾勇军, 石庆华, 张俊, 曾研华. 花后增温对双季晚粳稻产量和稻米品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020,53(7):1338-1347.
YANG T T, XIE J X, HAUNG S, TAN X M, PAN X H, ZENG Y J, SHI Q H, ZAHNG J, ZENG Y H. The impacts of post-anthesis warming on grain yield and quality of late japonica rice in a double rice cropping system. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020,53(7):1338-1347. (in Chinese)
[11] 龚金龙, 张洪程, 胡雅杰, 龙厚元, 常勇, 王艳, 邢志鹏, 霍中洋. 灌浆结实期温度对水稻产量和品质形成的影响. 生态学杂志, 2013,32(2):482-491.
GONG J L, ZHANG H C, HU Y J, LONG H Y, CHANG Y, WANG Y, XING Z P, HUO Z Y. Effects of air temperature during rice grain-filling period on the formation of rice grain yield and its quality. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013,32(2):482-491. (in Chinese)
[12] 陈能, 罗玉坤, 朱智伟, 张伯平, 郑有川, 谢黎虹. 优质食用稻米品质的理化指标与食味的相关性研究. 中国水稻科学, 1997,11(2):70-76.
CHEN N, LUO Y K, ZHU Z W, ZHANG B P, ZHENG Y C, XIE L H. Correlation between eating quality and physico-chemical properties of high grain quality rice. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 1997,11(2):70-76. (in Chinese)
[13] 赵庆勇, 朱镇, 张亚东, 陈涛, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 于新, 赵凌, 王才林. 播期和地点对不同生态类型粳稻稻米品质性状的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2013,27(3):297-304.
ZHAO Q Y, ZHU Z, ZHANG Y D, CHEN T, YAO S, ZHOU L H, YU X, ZHAO L, WANG C L. Effects of sowing data and site on grain quality of rice cultivars planted in different ecological types. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013,27(3):297-304. (in Chinese)
[14] 卫平洋, 裘实, 唐健, 肖丹丹, 朱盈, 刘国栋, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 郭保卫, 高尚勤, 魏海燕, 张洪程. 安徽沿淮地区优质高产常规粳稻品种筛选及特征特性. 作物学报, 2020,46(4):571-585.
WEI P Y, QIU S, TANG J, XIAO D D, ZHU Y, LIU G D, XING Z P, HU Y J, GUO B W, GAO S Q, WEI H Y, ZHANG H C. Screening and characterization of high-quality and high-yield japonica rice varieties in Yanhuai region of Anhui province. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020,46(4):571-585. (in Chinese)
[15] XU Y Y, YING Y N, OUYANG S H, DUAN X L, SUN H, JIANG S K, SUN S C, BAO J S. Factors affecting sensory quality of cooked japonica rice. Rice Science, 2018,25(6):330-339.
[16] LEELAYUTHSOONTORN P, THIPAYARAT A. Textural and morphological changes of Jasmine rice under various elevated cooking conditions. Food Chemistry, 2006,96(4):606-613.
[17] 孟庆虹, 程爱华, 姚鑫淼, 张瑞英, 陈凯新, 李霞辉. 粳稻食味品质评价方式的研究. 北方水稻, 2008,38(6):24-28.
MENG Q H, CHENG A H, YAO X M, ZHANG R Y, CHEN K X, LI X H. Study on palatability evaluation method of japonica rice. Nroth Rice, 2008,38(6):24-28. (in Chinese)
[18] 赖穗春, 河野元信, 王志东, 三上隆司, 黄道强, 李宏, 卢德城, 周德贵, 周少川. 米饭食味计评价华南籼稻食味品质. 中国水稻科学, 2011,25(4):435-438.
LAI S C, MOTONOBU K, WANG Z D, TAKASH M, HAUNG D Q, LI H, LU D C, ZHOU D G, ZHOU S C. Cooking and eating quality of indica rice varieties from south china by using taste analyzer. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011,25(4):435-438. (in Chinese)
[19] KIM H, KIM O W, KWAK H S, KIM S S, LEE H J. Prediction model of rice eating quality using physicochemical properties and sensory quality evaluation. Journal of Sensory Studies, 2017,32(4):e12273.
[20] LI H Y, GAO M Y, YANG J Y, WANG J, SUN B G. Washing rice before cooking has no large effect on the texture of cooked rice. Food Chemistry, 2019,271:388-392.
[21] QI X G, CHENG L L, LI X J, ZHANG D Y, WU G C, ZHANG H, WANG L, QIAN H F, WANG Y N. Effect of cooking methods on solubility and nutrition quality of brown rice powder. Food Chemistry, 2019,274:444-451.
[22] 邓飞, 王丽, 叶德成, 任万军, 杨文钰. 生态条件及栽培方式对稻米RVA谱特性及蛋白质含量的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38(4):717-724.
DENG F, WANG L, YE D C, REN W J, YANG W Y. Effects of ecological conditions and cultivation methods on rice starch RVA profile characteristics and protein content. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012,38(4):717-724. (in Chinese)
[23] 田青兰, 李培程, 刘利, 张强, 任万军. 四川不同生态区高产栽培条件下的杂交籼稻的稻米品质. 作物学报, 2015,41(8):1257-1268.
TIAN Q L, LI P C, LIU L, ZHANG Q, REN W J. Quality of indica hybrid rice under the high-yield cultivation conditions in different ecological regions of sichuan province, China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015,41(8):1257-1268. (in Chinese)
[24] 邓飞, 王丽, 刘利, 刘代银, 任万军, 杨文钰. 不同生态条件下栽培方式对水稻干物质生产和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38(10):1930-1942.
DENG F, WANG L, LIU L, LIU D Y, REN W J, YANG W Y. Effects of cultivation methods on dry matter production and yield of rice under different ecological conditions. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012,38(10):1930-1942. (in Chinese)
[25] 徐富贤, 刘茂, 周兴兵, 郭晓艺, 张林, 蒋鹏, 朱永川, 熊洪. 长江上游高温伏旱区气象因子对杂交中稻产量与稻米品质的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2020,26(1):106-116.
XU F X, LIU M, ZHOU X B, GUO X Y, ZHANG L, JIANG P, ZHU Y C, XIONG H. Effects of meteorological factors on yield and quality of mid-season hybrid rice in a high temperature and drought area in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2020,26(1):106-116. (in Chinese)
[26] 滕中华, 智丽, 吕俊, 宗学凤, 王三根, 何光华. 灌浆期高温对水稻光合特性、内源激素和稻米品质的影响. 生态学报, 2010,30(23):6504-6511.
TENG Z H, ZHI L, LÜ J, ZONG X F, WANG S G, HE G H. Effects of high temperature on photosynthesis characteristics, phytohormones and grain quality during filling-periods in rice. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010,30(23):6504-6511. (in Chinese)
[27] 何连华, 陈多, 张驰, 田青兰, 吴振元, 李秋萍, 钟晓媛, 邓飞, 胡剑锋, 凌俊英, 任万军. 机插栽培籼杂交稻的日产量及与株型的关系. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(6): 981-996.
HE L H, CHEN D, ZHANG C, TIAN Q L, WU Z Y, LI Q P, ZHONG X Y, DENG F, HU J F, LING J Y, REN W J. The daily yield of medium hybrid rice in machine transplanting and its relationship with plant type. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019,52(6):981-996. (in Chinese)
[28] CHAMPAGNE E T, BETT-GARBER K L, FITZGERALD M A, GRIMM C C, LEA J, OHTSUBO K, JONGDEE S, XIE L H, BASSINELLO P Z, RESURRECCION A, AHMAD R, HABIBI F, REINKE R. Important sensory properties differentiating premium rice varieties. Rice, 2010,3(4):270-281
[29] LU L, FANG C Y, HU Z Q, HU X Q, ZHU Z W. Grade classification model tandem BpNN method with multi-metal sensor for rice eating quality evaluation. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2019,281:22-27.
[30] 孙建平, 侯彩云, 王启辉, 芮闯. 食味仪评价我国大米食味值的可行性探讨. 粮油食品科技, 2008,16(6):1-3, 7.
SUN J P, HOU C Y, WANG Q H, RUI C. Discuss on feasibility of evaluating the taste value of rice by taste analyzer. Science and Technology of Cereals, Oils and Foods, 2008,16(6):1-3, 7. (in Chinese)
[31] 吕庆云, 三上隆司, 河野元信, 李再贵. 适合中国南方产籼米米饭食味评价方式的研究. 中国粮油学报, 2006,21(5):13-16.
LÜ Q Y, MIKAMI T, KAWANO M, LI Z G. The evaluation methods for long-grain rice produced in south china. Journal of Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2006,21(5):13-16. (in Chinese)
[32] KANAUCHI M, KANAUCHI K. Proposal for an Empirical Japanese Diet Score and the Japanese Diet Pyramid. Nutrients, 2019,11(11):2741.
[33] LI H Y, PRAKASH S, NICHOLSON T M, FITZGERALD M A, GILBERT R G. Instrumental measurement of cooked rice texture by dynamic rheological testing and its relation to the fine structure of rice starch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2016,146:253-263.
pmid: 27112873
[34] BALINDONG J L, WARD R, LIU L, ROSE T J, PALLAS L A, OVENDEN B W, SNELL P J, WATERS D L E. Rice grain protein composition influences instrumental measures of rice cooking and eating quality. Journal of Cereal Science, 2018,79(1):35-42.
[35] 江谷驰弘, 雷小波, 兰艳, 许光利, 丁春邦, 李天. 粳稻脂肪含量对稻米品质的影响. 华南农业大学学报, 2016,37(6):98-104.
JIANGGU C H, LEI X B, LAN Y, XU G L, DING B Y, LI T. Effect of lipid content on major qualities of japonica rice grains. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016,37(6):98-104. (in Chinese)
[36] NAKAMURA S, CUI J, ZHANG X, YANG H, XU X M, SHENG H, OHTSUBO K. Comparison of eating quality and physicochemical properties between Japanese and Chinese rice cultivars. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 2016,80(12):2437-2449.
[37] 朱玫, 熊宁, 刘欢, 吴量, 孟欢, 刘利, 吴莉莉. 籼稻的食味品质和综合品质评价模型的建立. 食品科学, 2016,37(21):97-103.
ZHU M, XIONG N, WU L, MENG H, LIU L, WU L L, Establishment of models to evaluate the eating quality and comprehensive quality of Indica rice. Food science, 2016,37(21):97-103. (in Chinese)
[38] 张春红, 李金州, 张亚东, 朱镇, 赵凌, 王才林. 食味仪测定与感官评价相结合鉴定优质粳稻食味特性. 江苏农业学报, 2009,25(5):958-965.
ZHANG C H, LI J Z, ZHANG Y D, ZHU Z, ZHAO L, WANG C L. Identification of palatability characteristics of high-quality Japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.) by taste analyzer and sensory score test. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009,25(5):958-965. (in Chinese)
[1] XIAO DeShun, XU ChunMei, WANG DanYing, ZHANG XiuFu, CHEN Song, CHU Guang, LIU YuanHui. Effects of Rhizosphere Oxygen Environment on Phosphorus Uptake of Rice Seedlings and Its Physiological Mechanisms in Hydroponic Condition [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 236-248.
[2] ZHANG XiaoLi, TAO Wei, GAO GuoQing, CHEN Lei, GUO Hui, ZHANG Hua, TANG MaoYan, LIANG TianFeng. Effects of Direct Seeding Cultivation Method on Growth Stage, Lodging Resistance and Yield Benefit of Double-Cropping Early Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[3] ZHANG Wei,YAN LingLing,FU ZhiQiang,XU Ying,GUO HuiJuan,ZHOU MengYao,LONG Pan. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield of Double Cropping Rice and Utilization Efficiency of Light and Heat Energy in Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 31-45.
[4] FENG XiangQian,YIN Min,WANG MengJia,MA HengYu,CHU Guang,LIU YuanHui,XU ChunMei,ZHANG XiuFu,ZHANG YunBo,WANG DanYing,CHEN Song. Effects of Meteorological Factors on Quality of Late Japonica Rice During Late Season Grain Filling Stage Under ‘Early Indica and Late Japonica’ Cultivation Pattern in Southern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 46-63.
[5] SANG ShiFei,CAO MengYu,WANG YaNan,WANG JunYi,SUN XiaoHan,ZHANG WenLing,JI ShengDong. Research Progress of Nitrogen Efficiency Related Genes in Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1479-1491.
[6] GUI RunFei,WANG ZaiMan,PAN ShengGang,ZHANG MingHua,TANG XiangRu,MO ZhaoWen. Effects of Nitrogen-Reducing Side Deep Application of Liquid Fertilizer at Tillering Stage on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Fragrant Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[7] LIAO Ping,MENG Yi,WENG WenAn,HUANG Shan,ZENG YongJun,ZHANG HongCheng. Effects of Hybrid Rice on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556.
[8] HAN XiaoTong,YANG BaoJun,LI SuXuan,LIAO FuBing,LIU ShuHua,TANG Jian,YAO Qing. Intelligent Forecasting Method of Rice Sheath Blight Based on Images [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1557-1567.
[9] GAO JiaRui,FANG ShengZhi,ZHANG YuLing,AN Jing,YU Na,ZOU HongTao. Characteristics of Organic Nitrogen Mineralization in Paddy Soil with Different Reclamation Years in Black Soil of Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1579-1588.
[10] ZHU DaWei,ZHANG LinPing,CHEN MingXue,FANG ChangYun,YU YongHong,ZHENG XiaoLong,SHAO YaFang. Characteristics of High-Quality Rice Varieties and Taste Sensory Evaluation Values in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1271-1283.
[11] ZHAO Ling, ZHANG Yong, WEI XiaoDong, LIANG WenHua, ZHAO ChunFang, ZHOU LiHui, YAO Shu, WANG CaiLin, ZHANG YaDong. Mapping of QTLs for Chlorophyll Content in Flag Leaves of Rice on High-Density Bin Map [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 825-836.
[12] JIANG JingJing,ZHOU TianYang,WEI ChenHua,WU JiaNing,ZHANG Hao,LIU LiJun,WANG ZhiQin,GU JunFei,YANG JianChang. Effects of Crop Management Practices on Grain Quality of Superior and Inferior Spikelets of Super Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 874-889.
[13] ZHANG YaLing, GAO Qing, ZHAO Yuhan, LIU Rui, FU Zhongju, LI Xue, SUN Yujia, JIN XueHui. Evaluation of Rice Blast Resistance and Genetic Structure Analysis of Rice Germplasm in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 625-640.
[14] WANG YaLiang,ZHU DeFeng,CHEN RuoXia,FANG WenYing,WANG JingQing,XIANG Jing,CHEN HuiZhe,ZHANG YuPing,CHEN JiangHua. Beneficial Effects of Precision Drill Sowing with Low Seeding Rates in Machine Transplanting for Hybrid Rice to Improve Population Uniformity and Yield [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 666-679.
[15] LI Long, LI ChaoNan, MAO XinGuo, WANG JingYi, JING RuiLian. Advances and Perspectives of Approaches to Phenotyping Crop Root System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 425-437.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!