Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (24): 5115-5124.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.24.014

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCE·RESOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Association of Rumen Histomorphology of Sheep with Different Feed Efficiencies

ZHANG DeYin1(),ZHANG XiaoXue1,LI FaDi1,2,LI Chong1,2,LI GuoZe1,ZHANG YuKun1,LI XiaoLong1,SONG QiZhi1,ZHAO Yuan1,LIU XiaoQing1,MA LiangQiang1,WANG WeiMin1()   

  1. 1College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070
    2Engineering Laboratory of Sheep Breeding and Reproduction Biotechnology in Gansu Province, Minqin 733300
  • Received:2020-01-02 Accepted:2020-09-05 Online:2020-12-16 Published:2020-12-28
  • Contact: WeiMin WANG E-mail:1547767138@qq.com;wangwm@gsau.edu.cn

Abstract:

【Objective】The individual pens was used to determine individual feed efficiency-related traits and rumen morphology indexes, and the association of feed efficiency of sheep and rumen histomorphology was discussed, so as to provide fundamental data for analyzing the influencing factors of sheep feed efficiency traits. 【Method】One hundred and eighty-seven Hu lambs with the similar birthday age, good growth and available pedigrees were selected randomly, and all lambs were transferred to the housed indoors in individual pens after weaning at 56 days, the lambs were subjected to a 14 days adaptation period. The pre-test period was 10 days and the experimental period was 100 days, during which all lambs were fed pellet feed and had free access to food and fresh drinking water. Lambs were weighed before feeding in the morning at 80 and 100 days, and feed intake (FI) were measured during 80-180 days. Average daily gain (ADG), metabolic body weight (MBW), feed conversion rate (FCR) and residual feed intake (RFI) were calculated and the descriptive statistics were carried out. The lambs were slaughtered at 180 days, and rumen abdominal sac tissue was collected, and stored in 4% formaldehyde solution for making tissue sections. The length, width and muscle thickness of the rumen papilla were observed. Finally, correlation analysis and variance analysis were carried out for the traits related to feed efficiency.【Result】The variation coefficients of feed efficiency-related traits were all greater than 10%, and the difference of the individuals with the largest and smallest residual feed intake was 0.57 kg per day. Phenotypic correlation analysis of feed efficiency-related traits showed that RFI was very significantly positively correlated with FCR (r= 0.68) and FI (r= 0.48) (P<0.01), there was no significant correlation with initial body weight (r=0) final body weight (r= -0.01) and average daily gain (r= -0.02) (P>0.05). The correlation analysis between feed efficiency and rumen histomorphology was found that the length of the rumen papilla was significantly or very significantly positively correlated with average daily gain, feed intake, initial body weight and final body weight (P<0.05 or P<0.01), while there were no significant differences in length and width of rumen papilla (P>0.05). The feed intake and feed conversion rate of lambs in the High-RFI group were significantly higher than those in the Low-RFI group (P<0.01), and the muscle thickness was significantly higher than that of the Medium-RFI group (P<0.05). There were significantly or extremely significantly differences in residual feed intake, feed intake, ADG, initial body weight, final body weight and the length of rumen in different FCR groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01), there was no significant difference between the rumen muscular thickness and the width of rumen papilla (P>0.05). Among them, the residual feed intake, feed intake, ADG, initial body weight and final body weight of the lambs in the High-FCR group were significantly or extremely significantly higher than those in the Low-FCR group (P<0.05 or P<0.01), The length of the rumen papilla in the medium-FCR group was significantly longer than that in the Low-FCR group (P<0.05). There were significant or extremely significant differences in the above indexes of the lambs in different FI groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01), and the residual feed intake, feed conversion rate, ADG, initial body weight, final body weight, muscle thickness and the length of the rumen papilla in the High-FI group were significantly or extremely significantly higher than those in the Low-FI group (P<0.05 or P<0.01). There were significant or extremely significant differences in feed intake, feed conversion rate, initial body weight, final body weight and muscle thickness in different ADG groups (P<0.05 or P<0.01), there was no significant difference between the length and the width of the rumen papilla (P>0.05), the feed intake, residual feed intake, initial body weight, final body weight and muscle thickness of the High-ADG group were significantly or extremely significantly higher than those of the Low-ADG group, and the feed conversion rate was significantly lower than that of the Low-ADG group.【Conclusion】There was a significant positive correlation between residual feed intake and the traits related to feed efficiency such as feed intake and feed conversion rate, indicating that it could be used as a potential index to measure feed efficiency. There was no significant correlation between the residual feed intake and feed conversion rate and the rumen histopathology. Feed intake and average daily gain were significantly positively correlated with the length of the rumen papilla and the muscular thickness, indicating that the morphology of the rumen tissue had significant effects on feed intake and body weight gain. However, the mechanism of action remains to be further studied.

Key words: residual feed intake, feed conversion rate, rumen, histomorphology, Hu sheep

Table 1

Descriptive statistics of feed efficiency traits"

性状 Trait 均值 Mean 标准差 SD 变异系数 CV(%) 最大值 Max 最小值 Min
剩余采食量RFI (kg·d-1) 0.00 0.10 - 0.30 -0.27
采食量FI (kg) 155.40 20.84 13.41 203.70 100.80
平均日增重ADG (g·d-1) 270.12 34.04 12.60 350.00 177.00
饲料转化率FCR 5.77 0.58 10.05 8.55 4.24
初始体重Initial BW (kg) 18.99 3.79 19.96 27.80 10.04
末期体重Final BW (kg) 46.00 6.01 13.07 61.90 29.10

Fig. 1

Correlation coefficient between feed efficiency traits The size of each circular indicates the absolute value of the correlation coefficient. The blue and red gradients indicate positive or negative correlation, respectively. ** means very difference significantly (P<0.01), * means significantly difference (P<0.05)"

Fig. 2

Rumen tissue morphology of lambs with different feed efficiency a: Low feed efficiency group; b: Medium feed efficiency group; c: High feed efficiency group"

Fig. 3

Correlation analysis between feed efficiency traits and rumen tissue of lambs The blue and red gradients indicate positive or negative correlation, respectively. ** means very difference significantly (P<0.01), * means significantly difference (P<0.05)"

Table 2

The morphological structure of rumen in different residual feed intake of lambs"

组别
Groups
个数
Numbers
采食量
FI (kg)
平均日增重
ADG
(g·d-1)
饲料转化率 FCR 初始体重
Initial BW
(kg)
末期体重
Final BW
(kg)
肌层厚度
Muscular thickness (μm)
乳头长度
Papilla height (μm)
乳头宽度
Papilla width (μm)
High-RFI 56 168.63±15.73A 272.93±32.71 6.22±0.55A 19.16±3.01 46.45±4.73 766.87±163.98a 1138.59±396.27 245.83±33.41
Medium-RFI 71 153.48±19.03B 267.96±34.55 5.75±0.43B 18.61±4.02 45.41±6.33 687.90±186.95b 1096.72±461.15 245.72±44.83
Low-RFI 60 145.31±20.85C 270.07±35.01 5.39±0.46C 19.28±4.16 46.28±6.68 719.26±189.87ab 1048.59±353.14 241.18±46.01

Table 3

The morphological structure of rumen in different average daily gain"

组别
Groups
个数
Numbers
采食量
FI (kg)
剩余采食量
RFI
(kg·d-1)
饲料转化率 FCR 初始体重
Initial BW
(kg)
末期体重
Final BW
(kg)
肌层厚度
Muscular thickness (μm)
乳头长度
Papilla height (μm)
乳头宽度
Papilla width (μm)
High-ADG 59 170.48±14.64A -0.006±0.11 5.55±0.44B 20.21±3.64A 50.96±4.18A 765.01±195.82a 1126.10±438.54 245.58±43.93
Medium-ADG 75 157.47±13.87B -0.005±0.09 5.84±0.53A 19.74±3.42A 46.74±3.56B 713.63±187.71ab 1124.63±367.61 245.42±42.04
Low-ADG 53 135.68±19.49C 0.005±0.11 5.94±0.71A 16.58±3.38B 39.44±4.34C 684.60±153.68b 1014.27±427.28 241.28±40.32

Table 4

The morphological structure of rumen in different feed intake"

组别
Groups
个数
Numbers
剩余采食量
RFI
(kg·d-1)
饲料转化率
FCR
平均日增重
ADG
(g·d-1)
初始体重
Initial BW
(kg)
末期体重
Final BW
(kg)
肌层厚度
Muscular thickness (μm)
乳头长度
Papilla height (μm)
乳头宽度
Papilla width (μm)
High-FI 59 0.049±0.10A 6.05±0.56A 295.79±26.80A 22.08±3.08A 51.66±3.63A 761.15±202.61a 1161.56±419.86A 239.28±33.94
Medium-FI 77 -0.004±0.09B 5.79±0.52B 271.10±23.52B 19.03±2.64B 46.14±3.16B 722.19±185.29ab 1155.08±414.32A 252.09±41.84
Low-FI 51 -0.061±0.08C 5.42±0.51C 238.98±29.47C 15.35±2.63C 39.25±4.39C 674.99±145.26b 922.96±340.51B 238.34±48.99

Table 5

The morphological structure of rumen in different feed conversion rate"

组别
Groups
个数
Numbers
剩余采食量
RFI
(kg·d-1)
采食量
FI (kg)
平均日增重
ADG
(g·d-1)
初始体重
Initial BW
(kg)
末期体重
Final BW
(kg)
肌层厚度
Muscular thickness (μm)
乳头长度
Papilla height
(μm)
乳头宽度
Papilla width (μm)
High-FCR 53 0.078±0.09A 165.51±17.72A 256.58±28.56B 21.11±3.48A 46.77±5.42a 709.28±147.02 1094.28±402.16ab 248.13±41.56
Medium-FCR 75 0.003±0.07B 158.22±18.37B 274.16±33.76A 19.32±3.09B 46.73±5.79a 741.11±220.29 1181.26±450.19a 238.19±32.44
Low-FCR 59 -0.083±0.07C 142.72±20.33C 277.15±35.92A 16.66±3.63C 44.38±6.53b 707.90±160.05 982.25±332.19b 248.62±41.98
[1] CANTALAPIEDRA-HIJAR G, ABO-ISMAIL M, CARSTENS G E, GUAN L L, HEGARTY R, KENNY D A, MCGEE M, PLASTOW G, RELLING A, ORTIGUES-MARTY I. Review: Biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle. Animal, 2018,12(s2):321-335.
[2] LI W, LIU R, ZHENG M, FENG F, WEN J. New insights into the associations among feed efficiency, metabolizable efficiency traits and related qtl regions in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2020,11(1):65.
doi: 10.1186/s40104-020-00469-8
[3] MCDONNELL R P, HART K J, BOLAND T M, KELLY A K, MCGEE M, KENNY D A. Effect of divergence in phenotypic residual feed intake on methane emissions, ruminal fermentation, and apparent whole-tract digestibility of beef heifers across three contrasting diets. Journal of Animal Science, 2016,94(3):1179-1193.
doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0080 pmid: 27065279
[4] KOCH R M, SWIGER L A, CHAMBERS D, GREGOR K E. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 1963,22(2):486-494.
doi: 10.2527/jas1963.222486x
[5] HOQUE M A, SUZUKI K, KADOWAKI H, SHIBATA T, OIKAWA T. Genetic parameters for feed efficiency traits and their relationships with growth and carcass traits in Duroc pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2007,124(3):108-116.
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00650.x pmid: 17550351
[6] FITZSIMONS C, KENNY DA, DEIGHTON MH, FAHEY AG, MCGEE M. Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science, 2013,91(12):5789-5800.
doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6956
[7] PRICE ALEXANDER M, BASARAB J, WANG Z D, NKRUMAH LOUIS J, SCHMID KENDRA K, MATHISON G W. Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 2006,84(1):145-153.
doi: 10.2527/2006.841145x pmid: 16361501
[8] ONTERU S K, GORBACH D M, YOUNG J M. Whole genome association studies of residual feed intake and related traits in the pig. PLoS One, 2013,8(6):e61756.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061756 pmid: 23840294
[9] DO D N, STRATHE A B, OSTERSEN T, PANT D S, KADARMIDEEN N H. Genome-wide association and pathway analysis of feed efficiency in pigs reveal candidate genes and pathways for residual feed intake. Frontiers in Genetics, 2014,5:307.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00307 pmid: 25250046
[10] SANTANA M H, UTSUNOMIYA Y T, NEVES H H, GOMES C R, GARCIA F J, FUKUMASU H, SILVA L S, JUNIOR O A, ALEXANDRE P A, LEME R P, BRASSALOTI A R, COUTINHO L L, LOPES G T, MEIRELLES V F, ELER P J, JOSÉ B S. Genome-wide association analysis of feed intake and residual feed intake in Nellore cattle. BMC Genetics, 2014,15(1):21.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-21
[11] GUAN L L, NKRUMAH J D, BASARAB J A, MOORE S S. Linkage of microbial ecology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle's feed efficiency. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2008,288(1):85-91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01343.x pmid: 18785930
[12] YUAN J, WANG K, YI G, MA M, DOU T, SUN C J, QU L J, SHEN MM, QU L, YANG N. Genome-wide association studies for feed intake and efficiency in two laying periods of chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2015,47(1):82.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0161-1
[13] TIANFEI L, CHENGLONG L, JIE W, JIE M, DINGMING S, SAND L M. Assessment of the genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency traits in meat-type chickens. PLoS One, 2017,12(3):e0173620.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173620 pmid: 28278209
[14] 王彩莲, 郝正里, 李发弟, 余洋, 郎侠, 马友记, 年芳, 郭江鹏. 0-56日龄放牧羔羊消化道的解剖特点和瘤胃功能变化. 畜牧兽医学报, 2010(4):38-45.
WANG C L, HAO Z L, LI F D, YU Y, LANG X, MA Y J, NIAN F, GUO J P. Anatomical changes of digestive tract and rumen functional development in grazing lamb at the age of 0-56 d. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2010,41(4):38-45. (in Chinese)
[15] 张彩英, 胡国良, 曹华斌. 反刍动物瘤胃内环境的特点及调控措施. 中国畜牧兽医, 2010,37(4):18-20.
ZHANG C Y, HU G L, CAO H B. Characteristics and control measures of rumen environment in ruminants. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, 2010,37(4):18-20. (in Chinese)
[16] 丁莉. 关中奶山羊周岁前消化系统发育规律的研究[D]. 西北农林科技大学, 2007.
DING L. The study on development of digestive system in Guanzhong dairy goat before oneyear old[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2007. (in Chinese)
[17] 冯如龙, 赵文嘉, 张锐, 陈国龙, 姜兴佳, 陈绍淑. 不同日龄舍饲绵羊瘤胃形态学变化. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2016,37(4):29-32.
FENG R L, ZHAO W J, ZHANG R, CHEN G L, JIANG X J, CHEN S S. The morphological changes of confined sheep rumen at different age in days. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2016,37(4):29-32. (in Chinese)
[18] 刘婷, 李发弟, 王维民, 汪晓娟, 李冲, 李飞, 郑琛, 莫负涛, 王芳彬, 喇永富, 李宝胜. 不同日龄补饲开食料对湖羊羔羊瘤胃形态及表皮生长相关基因表达的影. 畜牧兽医学报, 2016,47(12):2441-2449.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2016.12.014
LIU T, LI F D, WANG W M, WANG X J, LI C, LI F, ZHEN C, MO F T, WANG F B, LA Y F, LI B S. Effects of starter feeding on rumen papilla gene expression involved in cellular growth and morphology in hu lamb at different ages. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2016,47(12):2441-2449. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2016.12.014
[19] 汪晓娟, 刘婷, 李发弟, 李冲, 王维民, 唐德富, 李宝胜, 马志远, 潘香羽. 开食料补饲日龄对湖羊羔羊生长性能和胃发育的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2016,47(2):305-314.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2016.02.013
WANG X J, LIU T, LI F D, LI C, WANG W M, TANG D F, LI B S, MA Z Y, PAN X Y. Effect of starter supply age on the morphology of the rumen and small intestine in lamb. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2016,47(2):305-314. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2016.02.013
[20] BALDWIN R L, MCLEOD K R, KLOTZ J L. Rumen development, intestinal growth and hepatic metabolism in the pre- and postweaning ruminant. Journal of Dairy Science, 2004,87(1):E55-E65.
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70061-2
[21] 莫负涛. 不同RFI育肥羔羊生产性能和体组成及消化代谢研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2016.
MO F T. Study on production performance, body composition traits, digestion metabolism of lambs by different RFI [D]. LanZhou: GanSu Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese)
[22] 温蕾, 陈肇源, 陈桂霞, 袁镜乐. 石蜡切片的制作及其免疫组化染色技术. 畜牧兽医科技信息, 2018,5(36):497.
WEN L, CHEN Q Y, CHEN G X, YUAN J L. preparation of paraffin sections and immunohistochemical staining technique. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2018,5(36):497. (in Chinese)
[23] 金鑫, 张丽, 何林波, 肖先灿, 曹忻. 瘤胃发育研究进展[J]. 湖南畜牧兽医, 2019(4):52-54.
JIN X, ZHANG L, HE L B, XIAO X C, CAO X. Advance in ruminal development. Hunan Journal of Animal Science & Veterinary Medicine, 2019(4):52-54. (in Chinese)
[24] 祁敏丽, 刁其玉, 张乃锋. 羔羊瘤胃发育及其影响因素研究进展. 中国畜牧杂志, 2015,51(09):77-81.
QI M, DIAO Q Y, ZHANG N F. Advance in ruminal development and its influencing factors in lambs. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry, 2015,51(09):77-81. (in Chinese)
[25] 刘婷, 李发弟, 李冲, 王维民, 汪晓娟, 李飞, 郑琛, 莫负涛, 王芳彬, 喇永富, 李宝胜. 断奶时间对不同日龄湖羊羔羊瘤胃形态及表皮生长相关基因表达的影响. 动物营养学报, 2016,28(5):1384-1393.
LIU T, LI F D, LI C, WANG W M, WANG X J, LI F, ZHENG C, MO F T, WANG F B, LA Y F, LI B S. Effects of weaner time on rumen morphology and gene expressions involved in rumen epidermis growth of Hu Lambs at different days of age. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2016,28(5):1384-1393. (in Chinese)
[26] CROWLEY J J, MCGEE M, KENNY D A, CREWS D H, EVANS R D, BERRY D P. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls. Journal of Animal Science, 2010,88(3):885-894.
doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-1852 pmid: 19966161
[27] SAMUEL E A, FERNANDO G C, ROMDHANE R. Association of SNPs with components of residual feed intake parameters in a meat-type chicken population[C]// 10th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 2014.
[28] 张小雪. 不同剩余采食量羔羊生产性能和瘤胃微生物区系及肝脏转录组研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019.
ZHANG X X. Study on production performance, rumen microflora and liver transcriptome of lambs with different residual feed intake [D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[29] 石风华, 周振明, 任丽萍, 孟庆翔. 肉牛剩余采食量的概念和实践应用. 饲料工业, 2010(S2):138-141.
SHI F H, ZHOU Z M, REN L P, MENG Q X. Residual feed intake of beef cattle: the concept and it's application. Feed Industry, 2010(S2):138-141. (in Chinese)
[30] MCGEE M, WELCH C M, RAMIREZ J A, CARSTENS G E, PRICE WJ, Hall JB 4, Hill RA. Relationships of feeding behaviors with average daily gain, dry matter intake, and residual feed intake in Red Angus-sired cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 2014,92(11):5214-5221.
doi: 10.2527/jas2014-8036
[31] 梁玉生. 不同剩余采食量育肥湖羊的生长性能与瘤胃功能差异研究[D]. 兰州大学, 2017.
LIANG Y S. Study on growth performance and rumen function in finishing Hu lambs with different residual feed intakes[D]. Gansu Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[32] 朱文涛, 雒秋江, 陈勇, 古丽尼沙·依米提, 杨开伦. 3种日粮条件下15-60日龄羔羊的采食、消化和瘤胃消化代谢. 新疆农大学学报, 2007,30(4):1-9.
ZHU W T, LUO Q J, CHEN Y, GULINISHA Y M T, YANG K L. Intake, digestion and rumen metabolism of 15-60 day’s lambs fed with 3 diets. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2007,30(4):1-9. (in Chinese)
[1] TANG YuLin, ZHANG Bo, REN Man, ZHANG RuiXue, QIN JunJie, ZHU Hao, GUO YanSheng. Evaluation of Regulatory Effect of Guiqi Yimu Oral Liquid on Rumen of Postpartum Dairy Cows Based on UPLC-MS/MS Metabolomics Technology [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 368-378.
[2] KONG FanLin,LI Yuan,FU Tong,DIAO QiYu,TU Yan. Effects of 2-Hydroxy-4-(Methylthio)-Butanoic Acid on Rumen Fermentation and Microbiota in Holstein Female Calves [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 796-806.
[3] ChunTao ZHANG,Tao MA,Yan TU,QiYu DIAO. Effects of Circadian Rhythm on Rumen Fermentation and Nutrient Digestion of Mutton Sheep [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3664-3674.
[4] WANG JinFei,YANG GuoYi,FAN ZiHan,LIU Qi,ZHANG PengCheng,REN YouShe,YANG ChunHe,ZHANG ChunXiang. Effects of Whole Plant Corn Silage Ratio in Diet on Growth Performance, Rumen Fermentation, Nutrient Digestibility and Serological Parameters of Dorper×Hu Crossbred Female Lambs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 831-844.
[5] LI WenJuan,TAO Hui,ZHANG NaiFeng,MA Tao,DIAO QiYu. Effects of High-Fat Diet on Energy Metabolism and Slaughter Performance of Early-Weaning Lambs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(10): 2206-2216.
[6] YANG YunYan,WANG QiYan,PENG DiWei,PAN YiFan,GAO XiaoMei,XUAN ZeYi,CHEN ShaoMei,ZOU CaiXia,CAO YanHong,LIN Bo. Effects of Cinnamaldehyde on Growth Performance,Health Status, Rumen Fermentation and Microflora of Dairy Calves [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(10): 2229-2238.
[7] HAO XiaoYan,MU ChunTang,QIAO Dong,ZHANG XuanZi,YANG WenJun,ZHAO JunXing,ZHANG ChunXiang,ZHANG JianXin. Effects of High-Concentrate Diet Supplemented with Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins on Rumen fermentation, Inflammatory and Antioxidant Indicators of Rumen and Serum in Lambs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(10): 2239-2248.
[8] ZHENG WeiCai,HAO XiaoYan,ZHANG HongXiang,XIANG BinWei,ZHANG WenJia,ZHANG ChunXiang,ZHANG JianXin. Effects of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae and Bacillus Licheniformis on Growth Performance and Rumen Fermentation in Sheep [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(16): 3385-3393.
[9] WANG LiFang, ,AO ChangJin. The Effects of Artemisia annua Extracts on the Rumen Fermentation in Dairy Cows [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(23): 4548-4555.
[10] CHAI JianMin, WANG Bo, QI MinLi, WANG ShiQin, TU Yan, TAO XiaoJing, DIAO QiYu, ZHANG NaiFeng. Effect of Weaning Liquid Diet at Different Level of Creep Feed Intake on Growth and Development of Lambs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(2): 341-350.
[11] JIN ChengYan, Lü XiaoYang, GAO Wen, WANG Yue, CHEN WeiHao, SHENG ShuiXing, CHEN Ling, LIN Jie, SUN Wei. Study on the Relationship Between the Expression of Candidate miRNAs and the Developmental Characteristics in Different Patterns in Hu Sheep Lambskin [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(14): 2814-2824.
[12] YANG QiYue, HUANG Yong, CHEN YaBing, LIU LuoChuan, LI Jian, LAN DaoLiang. Screening of Optimal DNA Extraction Methods and the Bacterial Community Composition of Yak Rumen Revealed by High 16S rRNA Throughput Sequencing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(5): 932-941.
[13] JIANG WuJun,WU XiaoBo, LIU GuangNan, HE XuJiang, YAN WeiYu, ZENG ZhiJiang. Research and Application of Production Technology of Natural Honeybee Bread [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(19): 3828-3836.
[14] BAO Jian-jun, SU Rui, WANG Qing-zeng, Lü Xiao-yang, GAO Wen, YU Jia-rui, WANG Li-hong, CHEN Ling, WU Wen-zhong, SHENG Shui-xing, ZHOU Hong, SUN Wei, DAI Guo-jun. Study on the Temporal and Spatial Expression and Correlation Analysis of Smads and YAP1 Gene in the Hippo Pathway in Sheep Muscle Tissue [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(11): 2203-2213.
[15] WANG Peng-peng, ZHENG Nan, Wang Jia-qi, ZHAO Sheng-guo. Progresses of Research on Ruminal Urea Transport, Metabolism and Its Regulation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(S): 86-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!