Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5): 932-941.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.05.016

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Screening of Optimal DNA Extraction Methods and the Bacterial Community Composition of Yak Rumen Revealed by High 16S rRNA Throughput Sequencing

YANG QiYue1, HUANG Yong1, CHEN YaBing1, LIU LuoChuan1, LI Jian2, LAN DaoLiang2   

  1. 1College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041; 2College of Tibetan Plateau Research, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041
  • Received:2016-04-13 Online:2017-03-01 Published:2017-03-01

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to determine the optimal DNA extraction methods for yak rumen bacterial genome and preliminarily identify the bacterial community of yak rumen.【Method】Physical method (bead-beating, freeze-thaw), chemical method(CTAB, SDS) and enzymatic method (lysozyme, protease K) were combined with the characteristics of rumen bacteria, 9 different methods (method 1, CTAB-SDS-Lysozyme; method 2, CTAB-SDS-Lysozyme-freeze-thaw; method 3, CTAB-SDS-Lysozyme-bead-beating; method 4, CTAB-Lysozyme; method 5, CTAB-Lysozyme-freeze-thaw; method 6, CTAB- Lysozyme-bead-beating; method 7, SDS-lysozyme; method 8, SDS-lysozyme- freeze-thaw; method 9, SDS-lysozyme-bead-beating) were generated to extract the rumen bacterial DNA, besides, method 10, QIA amp DNA Stool Mini Kit, was also used as reference. The above 9 methods were compared and analyzed based on DNA concentration, purity, DNA electrophoretogram and 16S rRNA high throughput sequencing results, and the bacterial community of yak rumen was preliminarily identified based on the sequencing results.【Result】The comparison results of different DNA extraction methods efficiency showed that the combined beat-beating and freeze-thaw could significantly increase cell lysis efficiency and DNA yield under the same chemical and enzymatic conditions. Methods 3 and 6 obtained high DNA concentration and purity, methods 7, 8, 9, and 10 had lower volume of DNA than other methods because of the lack of CTAB. In addition to methods 2 and 8 as their PCR products were too weak or not detected, the PCR products of rest methods all had suitable objective strap size and concentration which met the requirements of 16S rRNA high throughput sequencing. After high throughput sequencing, a total of 191 349 raw reads were obtained, and 171 231 clean reads were obtained after quality control. Rare faction curves analysis showed that the amount of reads reached the saturation level, which could completely reflect the bacterial community species of the samples. OTU-based taxology and the diversity index analysis showed that methods 6 and 10 contained more abundant bacteria. The comparison of the effect of different extraction methods on Gram-positive bacteria showed that method 6 presented a comparatively higher capability in lysing cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria. Above all, the DNA yield, OTUs number, bacteria diversity, and excellent cell-breaking capability of method 6 (CTAB-Lysozyme- bead-beating) was better than that with other methods. The bacterial community structure analysis showed that the number of taxa in yak rumen contained approximately 21 phyla, 35 classes, 75 families, 112 genera. The bacteria community of higher abundance included Bacteroidtes (64%), Firmicutes (20%), Spirochaetae (2.3%), Proteobacteri (1.8%) and Fibrobacter (1.7%). Comparative analysis showed that there are some variation in the bacterial community between yaks and cattle, which may be attributed to different diets and habitats.【Conclusion】This study screened out an optimal DNA extraction method (method 6,CTAB-Lysozyme-Bead-beating) for yak rumen bacterial genome using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing, and the bacterial community structure of yak rumen was preliminarily evaluated. Results of the study provide a foundation for identifying the specificity of rumen microbial community and discovering distinct gene resource in yak.

Key words: yak, rumen microbe, DNA , extraction methods, bacteria community structure

[1]    Qiu Q, Zhang G J, Ma T, QIAN W B, WANG J Y, YE Z Q, CAO C C, HU QJ, JAEBUM K, DENIS M L, LORETTA A, BORIS C, MA J, HARRIS A L, QIAN X J, LANG Y S, ZHOU R, WANG L Z, WANG K, XIA J Q, LIAO S G, PAN S K, LU X, HOU H L, WANG Y, ZANG X T, YIN Y, MA H, ZHANG J, WANG Z F, ZHANG Y M, ZHANG D W, TAKAHIRO Y, MASAMI H, ZHONG Y, LIU W B, ZHANG Y, HUANG, Z Y, ZHANG S X, LONG R J, YANG H M, WANG J, JOHANNES A L, DAVID N C, WU Y, WANG J, SHI P, WANG J, LIU J Q. The yak genome and adaptation to life at high altitude. Nature Genetics, 2012, 44(8): 946-949.
[2]    ROSS EM, MOATE RJ, BARH CR, DAVIDSON S E, SAWBRIDGE T I, GUTHRIDGE K M, COCKS B G, HAYES B J. High throughput whole rumen metagenome profiling using untargeted massively parallel sequencing. BMC Genet, 2012, 13(53): 1-14..
[3]    GUAN L L, NKRUMAH J D, BASARAB J A, MOORE S S. Linkage of microbial ecology to the phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle’s feed efficiency. Fems Microbiology Letters 2008, 288(1): 85-91.
[4]    ZHOU M, HERNANDEZ-SANABRIA E, GUAN L L. Characterization of variation in rumen methanogenic communities, as determined by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(12): 3766-3786.
[5]    ZHANG T, SHAO M F, YE L. 454 Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity of activated sludge from 14 sewage treatment plants. Isme Journal Multidisciplinary Journal of Microbial Ecology 2012, 6(6): 1137-1147.
[6]    BIBBY K, VIAU E, PECCIA J. Pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to reveal bacterial pathogen diversity in biosolids. Water Research, 2010, 44(14): 4256-4260.
[7]    FOUTS D E, SZPAKOWSKI S, PURUSHE J, TORRALBA M, WATERMAN R C, MACNEIL M D, ALEXANDER L J, NELSON K E. Next generation sequencing to define prokaryotic and fungal diversity in the bovine rumen. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e48289.
[8]    OMONIYI L A, JEWELL K A, ISAH O A, NEUMANN A P, ONWUKA C F I, ONAGBESAN O M, SUEN G. An analysis of the ruminal bacterial microbiota in West African Dwarf sheep fed grass- and tree-based diets. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2014, 116(5): 1094-1095.
[9]    BERGMANN I, MUNDT K, SONTAG M, BAUMSTARK, NETTMANN E, KLOCKE M. Influence of DNA isolation on Q-PCR-based quantification of methanogenic Archaea in biogas fermenters. Systematic & Applied Microbiology, 2010, 33(2): 28-84.
[10]   MCORIST A L, JACCKSON M, BIRD A R. A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from hman faecal samples. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2002, 50(2): 131-139.
[11]   ARIEFDJOHAN M W, SAVAIANO D A, NAKASTSU C H. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens. Nutrition Journal, 2010, 22: 9-23.
[12]   YU Z, MORRISON M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal sample. Biotechniques, 2004, 36(5): 808-812.
[13]   GABRIELA V R, YEVANI V C, NAPOLEON G S, FLORENTINO A G, ERNESTINA G V, ALEJANDRO A P, MARCOS C J, VICTOR M B A, JUAN J V A. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods of rumen microbial populations. Word Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 29(2): 301-307.
[14]   HENDERSON G, COX F, KITTELMANN S, MIRI V H, ZETHOF M, NOEL S J, WAGHORN G C, JANSSEN P H. Effect of DNA extraction methods and sampling techniques on the apparent structure of cow and sheep rumen microbial communitie. Plos One, 2013, 8(9): e74787.
[15]   VANYSACKER L, DECLERCK S A, HELLEMANS B, MEESTER L D, VANKELECON I, DECLERCK P. Bacterial community analysis of activated sludge: an evaluation of four commonly used DNAextraction methods. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2010, 88(1): 299-307.
[16]   WEI G, PAN L, DU H, CHEN J Y, ZHAO L P. ERIC-PCR fingerprinting-based community DNA hybridization to pinpoint genome-specific fragments as molecular markers to identify and track populations common to healthy human guts. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2004, 59(1): 91-108.
[17]   李旦, 杨舒黎, 罗淑萍, 王加启.瘤胃微生物总DNA提取方法的比较. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(9): 1-5.
LI D, YANG S L, LUO S P, WANG J Q. Comparison methods of DNA extraction for rumen microbiology. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 22(9): 1-5. (in Chinese)
[18]   刘薇, 方国庆, 刘立成, 王志博, 王燕, 张永根.奶牛瘤胃微生物DNA提取法的研究与优化.中国畜牧杂志, 2011, 47(13): 71-75.
LIU W, FANG G Q, LIU L C, WANG Z B, WANG Y, ZHANG Y G. Study and optimization of DNA extraction method of rumen microorganisms in cow. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 47(13): 71-75. (in Chinese)
[19]   杨瑞红, 王加启, 罗淑萍, 董志扬.奶牛瘤胃微生物总DNA的提取和纯化. 新疆农业大学学报, 2005, 28(2): 39-42.
YANG R H, WANG J Q, LUO S P, DONG Z Y. Extraction and purification of DNA from environmental rumen samples. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2005, 28(2): 39-42. (in Chinese)
[20]   徐文华, 韩金涛, 蔡涛, 辛小玲, 白延琴, 刘超, 辛亚平. 秦川牛瘤胃微生物DNA提取方法的比较试验. 中国牛业科学, 2012, 38(6): 41-44.
XU W H, HAN J T, CAI T, XIN X L, BAI Y Q, LIU C, XIN Y P. Comparison of various methods for extracting Qinchuan cattle rumen microbial DNA. China Cattle Science, 2012, 38(6): 41-44.(in Chinese)
[21]   COLWELL R K, CODDINGTON J A. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1994, 345(1311): 101-118.
[22]   SCHLOSS P D, HANDELSMAN J. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for de?ning operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71(3): 1501-1506.
[23]   CHAO A, LEE S M. Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1992, 87(417): 210-217.
[24]   NICHOLAS J, GOTEL L. Ecology: Biodiversity in the scales. Nature, 2002, 419(6907): 575-576.
[25]   GUO W, LI Y, WANG L, WANG J W, XU Q, YAN T H, BAI X. Evaluation of composition and individual variability of rumen microbiota in yaks by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing technology. Anaerobe, 2015, 34: 74-79.
[26]   GUO T, ZHANG T. Biases during DNA extraction of activated sludge samples revealed by high throughput sequencing. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2013, 97(10): 4607-4616.
[27]   ZENED A, COMBES S, CAUQUIL L, MARIETTE J, KLOPP C, BOUNCHEZ, MEYNADIER A T, ENJALBERT F. microbial ecology of the rumen evaluated by 454 GS FLX pyrosequencing is affected by starch and oil supplementation. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 2013, 83(2): 504-514.
[28]   JAMI E, MIZRAHI I. Composition and simility of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals. PLoS One, 2012, 7(3): e33306.
[29]   JAMI E, MIZRAHI I. Similarity of the ruminal bacteria across individual lactating cows. Anaerobe, 2012, 18(3): 338-343.
[30]   PETRI RM, SCHWAIGER T, PENER G B, BEAUCHEMIN K A, FORSTER R J, MCKINNON J J, MCALLISTER T A. Characterization of the core rumen microbiome in cattle during transition from forage to concentrate as well as during and after acidotic challenge. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e83424.
[1] LIN Ping, WANG KaiLiang, YAO XiaoHua, REN HuaDong. Development of DNA Molecular ID in Camellia oleifera Germplasm Based on Transcriptome-Wide SNPs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 217-235.
[2] WANG JiaMin,SHI JiaChen,MA FangFang,CAI Yong,QIAO ZiLin. Effects of Soy Isoflavones on the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Yak Ovarian Granulosa Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1667-1675.
[3] ZHAO ChunFang,ZHAO QingYong,LÜ YuanDa,CHEN Tao,YAO Shu,ZHAO Ling,ZHOU LiHui,LIANG WenHua,ZHU Zhen,WANG CaiLin,ZHANG YaDong. Screening of Core Markers and Construction of DNA Fingerprints of Semi-Waxy Japonica Rice Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4567-4582.
[4] HUANG XunHe,WENG ZhuoXian,LI WeiNa,WANG Qing,HE DanLin,LUO Wei,ZHANG XiQuan,DU BingWang. Genetic Diversity of Indigenous Yellow-Feathered Chickens in Southern China Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA D-Loop Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4526-4538.
[5] MA XueMeng,YU ChengMin,SAI XiaoLing,LIU Zhen,SANG HaiYang,CUI BaiMing. PSORA: A Strategy Based on High-Throughput Sequence for Analysis of T-DNA Insertion Sites [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 2875-2882.
[6] RAN HongBiao,ZHAO LiLing,WANG Hui,CHAI ZhiXin,WANG JiKun,WANG JiaBo,WU ZhiJuan,ZHONG JinCheng. Effects of lncFAM200B on the Lipid Deposition in Intramuscular Preadipocytes of Yak [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2654-2666.
[7] LI ZhenXi,LI WenTing,HUANG JiaQuan,ZHENG Zheng,XU MeiRong,DENG XiaoLing. Detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ by Membrane Adsorption Method Combined with Visual Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(1): 74-84.
[8] FAN XiaoJing, YU WenTao, CAI ChunPing, LIN Yi, WANG ZeHan, FANG WanPing, ZHANG JianMing, YE NaiXing. Construction of Molecular ID for Tea Cultivars by Using of Single- nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Markers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1751-1760.
[9] TANG XiuJun,FAN YanFeng,JIA XiaoXu,GE QingLian,LU JunXian,TANG MengJun,HAN Wei,GAO YuShi. Genetic Diversity and Origin Characteristics of Chicken Species Based on Mitochondrial DNA D-loop Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5302-5315.
[10] ZHANG Wei,WANG ShiYin,GAO Li,YANG LiWei,DENG ShuangYi,LIU XiaoNa,SHI GuoQing,GAN ShangQuan. Investigation of miR-486 Target Genes in Skeletal Muscle of Bashbay Sheep in Different Development Periods [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(14): 3134-3148.
[11] LI XueRu,SHI XiXiong,WANG JianZhong,ZHANG PanGao,TIAN Zhu,HAN Ling. Effect of Nitric Oxide Synthetase Inhibitor on Yak Meat Quality During Post-Mortem Aging [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1617-1626.
[12] LI ZhengGang,NONG Yuan,TANG YaFei,SHE XiaoMan,YU Lin,LAN GuoBing,DENG MingGuang,HE ZiFu. Molecular Characteristic and Pathogenicity Analyses of Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV) Infecting Bottle Gourd in Lianzhou, Guangdong [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(5): 955-964.
[13] GAO Yuan,WANG DaJiang,WANG Kun,CONG PeiHua,ZHANG CaiXia,LI LianWen,PIAO JiCheng. Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetics of Malus baccata (L.) Borkh Revealed by Chloroplast DNA Variation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(3): 600-611.
[14] MIAO JianJun,PENG ZhongLi,GAO YanHua,BAI Xue,XIE XinTing. Effects of Dietary Small Peptides on Production Performance and Expression of PepT1 mRNA in Digestive Tract of Fattening Yaks [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4950-4960.
[15] PAN YangYang,WANG Meng,RUI Xian,WANG LiBin,HE HongHong,WANG JingLei,MA Rui,XU GengQuan,CUI Yan,FAN JiangFeng,YU SiJiu. RNA-Binding Motif Protein 3(RBM3) Expression is Regulated by Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF-1) for Protecting Yak (Bos grunniens) Cumulus Cells from Apoptosis During Hypothermia Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(11): 2285-2296.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!