4种矮化砧木对再植苹果幼树生长、产量和品质的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.11.012

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 The effects of four dwarfing rootstocks (G935, G41, G11 and M9-T337) on the growth, early fruiting and yield quality of Fuji apple saplings under the replanting conditions were investigated for four years. The dwarfing rootstocks suitable for continuous cropping in Beijing were evaluated and selected, so as to provide a technical support for the renewal of the cultivation mode of old and inefficient apple orchards in China. 【Method】In the spring of 2016, 6-year-old apple trees (Fuji/SH6/ Malus prunifolia) were planed out and no soil improvement was carried out. 4 dwarfing rootstocks (G935, G11, G41 and M9-T337) Fuji apple seedlings (2-year-old roots and 1-year-dry) were directly planted in the original row, with a row spacing of 1 m×3.8 m. After planting, 4 dwarfing plants were investigated differences of tree growth, early fruiting, yield and quality of Fuji apple on rootstock for 4 consecutive years. 【Result】 The height of Fuji trees on G935 and G41 rootstock was higher than that of G11 and M9-T337; the number of main branches from high to low was: G935>G41>G11>M9-T337; the phenomenon of big feet of G41 and M9-T337 was higher than that of G935 and G11; the difference of height, diameter and number of main branches between G935 and G41 was significantly lower than that of G11 and M9-T337, with the neat garden phase. In the fourth year of continuous cropping, the chlorophyll content and net photosynthetic rate of leaves of G935 and G41 rootstocks were significantly higher than G11 and M9-T337, the fresh weight of leaves of G935 and G41 was significantly higher than G11 and M9-T337, and the dry weight of leaves of G935 and G41 was significantly higher than M9-T337. Within 4 years of continuous cropping, Fuji, the dwarfing rootstock of G935 and G41, grew normally, and the branch composition was in line with the change rule of dwarf rootstock fruit trees. From the second year, the proportion of long branches of G11 and M9-T337 trees was lower than 30%; from the third and fourth year, the proportion of short branches of G11 and M9-T337 trees was higher than 80%, the proportion of long branches was lower than 10%, and the tree vigor was obviously weakened. In the third year of continuous cropping, the flowering rate of G11 young trees was the highest, followed by G935 and G41, and M9-T337 had no flowering. In the fourth year of continuous cropping, the average yield per plant of Fuji on G935 and G41 rootstocks was significantly higher than that of M9-T337 and the average fruit weight and fruit shape index of G935 were significantly higher than those of other rootstocks. There were no significant differences in the soluble solid content, titratable acid content and solid acid ratio of the fruit of each rootstock. 【Conclusion】 Under the condition of replantation, the growth of young trees with G935 and G41 as rootstocks was significantly better than that of G11 and M9-T337. The branch composition was reasonable, the tree potential was moderate but not weak, the difference between single plants was small, and the garden was neat, which was suitable for continuous cropping in Beijing.

Key words: apple replant orchard, G dwarfing rootstocks, Fuji apple, tree growth, fruit yield, fruit quality

LI MinJi,ZHANG Qiang,LI XingLiang,ZHOU BeiBei,YANG YuZhang,ZHANG JunKe,ZHOU Jia,WEI QinPing. Effects of 4 Dwarfing Rootstocks on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of ‘Fuji’ Sapling in Apple Replant Orchard[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(11): 2264-2271.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.11.012

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2020/V53/I11/2264

Figures/Tables 5

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

References 34

[1]	韩明玉 . 苹果矮砧集约高效栽培模式. 果农之友, 2009(9):12.
	HAN M Y . Intensive apple orchard systems.Fruit Grower’s Friend, 2009(9):12. (in Chinese)
[2]	VAIO C D, CIRILLO C, BUCCHERI M, LIMONGELLI F . Effect of interstock (M.9 and M.27) on vegetative growth and yield of apple trees. Scientia Horticulturae, 2009,119:270-274.
[3]	LICZNAR-MALANCZUKA M . Influence of planting and training systems on fruit yield in apple orchard. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 2004,12:97-104.
[4]	ROBINSON T L . Recent advances and future directions in orchard planting systems. Acta Horticulturae, 2004,732:367-381.
[5]	ROBINSON T L, HOYING S A, REGINATO G L . The tall spindle apple planting system. New York Fruit Quarterly, 2006,14(2):21-28.
[6]	马宝焜, 徐继忠, 孙建设 . 关于我国苹果矮砧密植栽培的思考. 果树学报, 2010,27(1):105-109.
	MA B K, XU J Z, SUN J S . Consideration for high density planting with dwarf rootstocks in apple in China. Journal of Fruit Science, 2010,27(1):105-109. (in Chinese)
[7]	李丙智, 张林森, 韩明玉 . 世界苹果矮化砧木应用现状. 果农之友, 2007(7):4-6.
	LI B Z, ZHANG L S, HAN M Y . Application status of apple dwarfing rootstocks in world.Fruit Grower’s Friend, 2007(7):4-6. (in Chinese)
[8]	李丙智, 韩明玉, 张林森, 雷小明 . 我国矮砧苹果生产现状与发展缓慢的原因分析及建议. 烟台果树, 2010(2):1-4.
	LI B Z, HAN M Y, ZHANG L S, LEI X M . The suggestion and analysis of the causes of slow development on short anvil apple production in China present situation.Yantai Fruits, 2010(2):1-4. (in Chinese)
[9]	LAURENT A S, MERWIN I A, FAZIO G, THIES J E, BROWN M G . Rootstock genotype succession influences apple replant disease and root-zone microbial community composition in an orchard soil. Plant and Soil, 2010,337(1/2):259-272.
[10]	MAI W F, ABAWI G S . Controlling replant diseases of pome and stone fruits in Northeastern United-States by preplant fumigation. Plant Disease, 1981,65:859-864. doi: 10.1094/PD-65-859
[11]	MAI W F, MERWIN I A, ABAWI G S . Diagnosis, etiology, and management of replant problems in New York cherry and apple orchards. Acta Horticulturae, 1994,363:33-41.
[12]	MAZZOLA M . Elucidation of the microbial complex having a causal role in the development of apple replant disease in Washington. Phytopathology, 1998,88:930-938.
[13]	MAZZOLA M . Transformation of soil microbial community structure and Rhizoctonia-suppressive potential in response to apple roots. Phytopathology, 1999,89:920-927.
[14]	李晶, 王新语, 张焕春, 张学勇, 刘美英, 李淑平, 姜中武 . 脱毒红将军苹果品种在重茬果园的栽培表现与果实品质分析. 安徽农业科学, 2018,46(13):59-60, 82.
	LI J, WANG X Y, ZHANG H C, ZHANG X Y, LIU M Y, LI S P, JIANG Z W . Cultivation performance and fruit quality of virus-free Red General apple variety in replanted orchard. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018,46(13):59-60, 88. (in Chinese)
[15]	毛志泉, 沈向 . 苹果重茬(连作)障碍防控技术. 烟台果树, 2016(4):26-27.
	MAO Z Q, SHEN X . Prevention and control technology of apple continuous cropping obstacle.Yantai Fruits, 2016(4):26-27. (in Chinese)
[16]	黄翠香, 毛志泉, 韩甜甜, 张文会, 夏燕飞, 王荣, 沈向 . 有机营养活化发酵液处理重茬土壤对苹果幼树生长的影响. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(1):178-182.
	HUANG C X, MAO Z Q, HAN T T, ZHANG W H, XIA Y F, WANG R, SHEN X . The effect of the cropping soil disposed with the fermentation fluid of organic materials on the growth of young apple trees. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013,29(1):178-182. (in Chinese)
[17]	PAWLICKI N, WELANDER M . Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf segments of in vitro cultured shoots of the apple rootstock Jork 9. Journal of Horticultural Science, 1994,69:687-696. doi: 10.1080/14620316.1994.11516501
[18]	RABI F, RAB A, RAHMAN K U, MUNIR M . Response of apple cultivars to graft take success on apple rootstock. Journal of Biology Agriculture & Healthcare, 2014,4(3):78-84.
[19]	AUTIO W R, BARRITT B H, CLINE J A, CRASSWELLER R M, EMBREE C G, FERREE D C, GARCIA M E, GREENE G M, HOOVER E E, JOHNSON R S, KOSOLA K, MASABNI J G . Early performance of ‘Fuji’ and ‘Mcintosh’ apple trees on several dwarf rootstocks in the 1999 Nc-140 rootstock trial. Acta Horticulturae, 2007,732:127-133.
[20]	JACKSON J E . Word-wide development of high density planting in research and practice. Acta Horticulturae, 1989,243:17-28.
[21]	CZYNCZYK A, OMIECINSKA B . Effect of new rootstocks of Polish, Russian and Czechoslovakian breeds and two depth of planting of trees with interstems on growth and cropping of 3 apple cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 1989,243:71-78.
[22]	ZAGAJA S W . Performance of two apple cultivars on pseries dwarf rootstocks. Acta Horticulturae, 1981,114:162-169.
[23]	ISUTSA D K, MERWIN I A . Malus germplasm varies in resistance or tolerance to apple replant disease in a mixture of New York orchard soils. HortScience, 2000,35:262-268. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.2.262
[24]	LEINFELDER M, MERWIN I A . Rootstock selection, pre-plant soil treatments, and tree planting positions as factors in managing apple replant disease. HortScience, 2006,41:394-401. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.41.2.394
[25]	麻珊珊 . 苹果矮化自根砧—M9T337. 西北园艺(果树), 2017(4):6-8.
	MA S S . Apple dwarfing rootstock-M9T337.Northwest Horticulture, 2017(4):6-8. (in Chinese)
[26]	何平, 李林光, 王海波, 常源升 . 5个矮化中间砧对‘沂水红’富士苹果生长、结果和叶片矿质元素积累的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(4):750-757. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.04.014
	HE P, LI L G, WANG H B, CHANG Y S . Effects of five dwarfing interstocks on shoot growth, fruiting and accumulation of mineral elements in leaves of Yishui Red Fuji apple. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(4):750-757. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.04.014
[27]	高登涛, 郭景南, 魏志峰, 范庆锦, 杨朝选 . 中部地区两类矮砧密植苹果园生产效率及光照质量评价. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(5):909-916. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.05.011
	GAO D T, GUO J N, WEI Z F, FAN Q J, YANG C X . Evaluation of productivity and light quality in two high density dwarf rootstock apple orchards in central China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012,45(5):909-916. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.05.011
[28]	董建波 . 苹果矮砧密植园个体与群体参数研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2010.
	DONG J B . Research on individual and group parameters of apple orchard with intensive planting on dwarf rootstock[D]. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei, 2010. ( in Chinese)
[29]	张强, 魏钦平, 尚志华 . 北京地区矮砧苹果园优质丰产树体结构和光照状况分析. 果树学报, 2013,30(4):586-590.
	ZHANG Q, WEI Q P, SHANG Z H . Analysis of tree structure and relative light intensity in apple orchard with dwarf interstock for good qualities and high yield in Beijing region. Journal of Fruit Science, 2013,30(4):586-590. (in Chinese)
[30]	李民吉, 张强, 李兴亮, 周贝贝, 孙健, 张军科, 魏钦平 . 五个SH系矮化中间砧对‘富士’苹果树体生长、产量和品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(22):4419-4428. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.22.014
	LI M J, ZHANG Q, LI X L, ZHOU B B, SUN J, ZHANG J K, WEI Q P . Effect of five different dwarfing interstocks of sh on growth, yield and quality in ‘Fuji’ apple trees. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(22):4419-4428. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.22.014
[31]	张强, 魏钦平, 刘松忠, 王小伟, 尚志华, 路瑾瑾 . SH6矮化中间砧富士苹果幼树至结果初期树冠结构、产量和品质的形成. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(9):137-143.
	ZHANG Q, WEI Q P, LIU S Z, WANG X W, SHANG Z H, LU J J . Formation of canopy structure, yield and fruit quality of ‘Fuji’ apple with SH6 dwarf interstock from juvenility to fruiting early stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013,46(9):137-143. (in Chinese)
[32]	李民吉, 张强, 李兴亮, 周贝贝, 杨雨璋, 周佳, 张军科, 魏钦平 . SH6矮化中间砧"富士"苹果不同树形对树体生长和果实产量、品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(19):3789-3796. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.19.015
	LI M J, ZHANG Q, LI X L, ZHOU B B, YANG Y Z, ZHOU J, ZHANG J K, WEI Q P . Effect of three different tree shapes on growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Fuji’ apple trees on dwarfing interstocks. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(19):3789-3796. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.19.015
[33]	李敏敏, 安贵阳, 张雯, 郭燕, 赵政阳, 杨建锋 . 不同冬剪强度对乔化富士苹果成花、枝条组成和结果的影响. 西北农业学报, 2011,20(5):126-129.
	LI M M, AN G Y, ZHANG W, GUO Y, ZHAO Z Y, YANG J F . Effect of winter pruning on flowering, shoot-type composing and fruiting on Fiji apple trees. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2011,20(5):126-129. (in Chinese)
[34]	阮班录, 刘建海, 李丙智 . 不同修剪处理方法对苹果结果枝组生长和成花的影响. 陕西农业科学, 2011,57(4):52-53.
	RUAN B L, LIU J H, LI B Z . Effects of different pruning methods on growth and flower formation of apple fruiting branch. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011,57(4):52-53. (in Chinese)

Related Articles 15

[1]	SONG JiangTao,SHEN DanDan,GONG XuChen,SHANG XiangMing,LI ChunLong,CAI YongXi,YUE JianPing,WANG ShuaiLing,ZHANG PuFen,XIE ZongZhou,LIU JiHong. Effects of Artificial Fruit Thinning on Sugar and Acid Content and Expression of Metabolism-Related Genes in Fruit of Beni-Madonna Tangor [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4688-4701.
[2]	GAO XiaoQin,NIE JiYun,CHEN QiuSheng,HAN LingXi,LIU Lu,CHENG Yang,LIU MingYu. Geographical Origin Tracing of Fuji Apple Based on Mineral Element Fingerprinting Technology [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4252-4264.
[3]	WAN LianJie,HE Man,LI JunJie,TIAN Yang,ZHANG Ji,ZHENG YongQiang,LÜ Qiang,XIE RangJin,MA YanYan,DENG Lie,YI ShiLai. Effects of Partial Substitution of Chemical Fertilizer by Organic Fertilizer on Ponkan Growth and Quality as well as Soil Properties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 2988-3001.
[4]	WANG JunZheng,ZHANG Qi,GAO ZiXing,MA XueQiang,QU Feng,HU XiaoHui. Effects of Two Microbial Agents on Yield, Quality and Rhizosphere Environment of Autumn Cucumber Cultured in Organic Substrate [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(14): 3077-3087.
[5]	ZHANG Ji,LI JunJie,WAN LianJie,YANG JiangBo,ZHENG YongQiang,LÜ Qiang,XIE RangJin,MA YanYan,DENG Lie,YI ShiLai. Effects of Potassium Application Levels on Nutrient, Yield and Quality of Newhall Navel Orange [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(20): 4271-4286.
[6]	WANG XiaoYue,ZHANG GuoJun,SUN Lei,ZHAO Yin,YAN AiLing,WANG HuiLing,REN JianCheng,XU HaiYing. Effects of Two Trellis Systems on Viticultural Characteristics and Fruit Quality of Three Table Grape Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7): 1150-1163.
[7]	JI XiaoHao,LIU FengZhi,SHI XiangBin,WANG BaoLiang,LIU PeiPei,WANG HaiBo. The Effects of Different Training Systems and Shoot Spacing on the Fruit Quality of ‘Kyoho’ Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7): 1164-1172.
[8]	YANG JiangBo,ZHANG Ji,LI JunJie,ZHENG YongQiang,LÜ Qiang,XIE RangJin,MA YanYan,DENG Lie,HE ShaoLan,YI ShiLai. Effects of Nitrogen Application Levels on Nutrient, Yield and Quality of Tarocco Blood Orange and Soil Physicochemical Properties in the Three Gorges Area of Chongqing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(5): 893-908.
[9]	JiaHao WANG,YaQian DUAN,LanChun NIE,LiYan SONG,WenSheng ZHAO,SiYu FANG,JiaTeng ZHAO. Factor Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of the Fruit Quality of ‘Yangjiaocui’ Melons [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(24): 4582-4591.
[10]	YAN YiChao, WAN ChunYan, GU XianBin, GUO ChengBao, CHEN YueHong, GAO ZhiHong. Effect of RdreB1BI Gene Overexpression on Fruit Quality and Related Gene Expression in Strawberry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(7): 1353-1367.
[11]	HE Ping, LI LinGuang, WANG HaiBo, CHANG YuanSheng. Effects of Five Dwarfing Interstocks on Shoot Growth, Fruiting and Accumulation of Mineral Elements in Leaves of Yishui Red Fuji Apple [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(4): 750-757.
[12]	BAI YongChao, WEI XuFang, CHEN Lu, WAN RuMeng, HOU ZhiXia. Multivariate Analysis of Fruit Leaf Mineral Elements, Soil Fertility Factors and Fruit Quality of Vaccinium uliginosum L. [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(1): 170-181.
[13]	HU DeYu, LIU XueFeng, HE ShaoLan, XIE RangJin, QIAN Chun, Lü Qiang, YI ShiLai, ZHENG YongQiang, DENG Lie. Effect of Plant Canopy Transformation on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics and Fruit Yield and Quality in Closed Citrus Orchard [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(9): 1734-1746.
[14]	LI MinJi, ZHANG Qiang, LI XingLiang, ZHOU BeiBei, YANG YuZhang, ZHOU Jia, ZHANG JunKe, WEI QinPing. Effect of Three Different Tree Shapes on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of ‘Fuji’ Apple Trees on Dwarfing Interstocks [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(19): 3789-3796.
[15]	ZHAO JianHua, SHU XiaoYing, LI HaoXia, ZHENG HuiWen, YIN Yue, AN Wei, WANG YaJun. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality of Wolfberry (Lycium L.) Fresh Fruits with Different Fruit Colors [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(12): 2338-2348.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

砧木类型 Different rootstocks	新梢长度 Length of new branches (cm)	叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content (mg·g^-1)	净光合速率 Net Photosynthesis rate (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	百叶重鲜重 Fresh weight of one hundred leaves (g)	百叶重干重 Dry weight of one hundred leaves (g)
G935	61.5a	64.58a	12.08a	106.28a	37.29a
G41	44.8b	65.41a	12.58a	102.63a	36.81a
G11	28.5c	58.34b	9.86b	95.47b	32.78ab
M9-T337	25.4c	57.29b	9.58b	94.25b	31.29b

砧木类型 Different rootstocks	成花株率 Rate of flowering plants (%)
G935	19.5%b
G41	21.9%b
G11	34.9%a
T337	0c

砧木类型 Rootstock type	平均单株产量 Average yield of single plant (kg/plant)	平均单果重 Mean fruit mass (g)	果形指数 Fruit figure index	可溶性固性物料含量 Soluble solids (%)	可滴定酸含量 Titratable acidity (%)	固酸比 TSS/TA
G935	11.03±1.51a	221.1a	0.85a	16.2a	0.29a	58.29a
G41	10.48±1.22a	189.2b	0.79b	15.9a	0.28a	56.51a
G11	7.36±4.15ab	190.3b	0.79b	16.3a	0.30a	57.94a
M9-T337	4.31±1.68b	167.5c	0.77b	15.9a	0.29a	56.24a

Effects of 4 Dwarfing Rootstocks on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of ‘Fuji’ Sapling in Apple Replant Orchard

RichHTML

PDF