Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5): 932-941.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.05.016

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Screening of Optimal DNA Extraction Methods and the Bacterial Community Composition of Yak Rumen Revealed by High 16S rRNA Throughput Sequencing

YANG QiYue1, HUANG Yong1, CHEN YaBing1, LIU LuoChuan1, LI Jian2, LAN DaoLiang2   

  1. 1College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041; 2College of Tibetan Plateau Research, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041
  • Received:2016-04-13 Online:2017-03-01 Published:2017-03-01

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to determine the optimal DNA extraction methods for yak rumen bacterial genome and preliminarily identify the bacterial community of yak rumen.【Method】Physical method (bead-beating, freeze-thaw), chemical method(CTAB, SDS) and enzymatic method (lysozyme, protease K) were combined with the characteristics of rumen bacteria, 9 different methods (method 1, CTAB-SDS-Lysozyme; method 2, CTAB-SDS-Lysozyme-freeze-thaw; method 3, CTAB-SDS-Lysozyme-bead-beating; method 4, CTAB-Lysozyme; method 5, CTAB-Lysozyme-freeze-thaw; method 6, CTAB- Lysozyme-bead-beating; method 7, SDS-lysozyme; method 8, SDS-lysozyme- freeze-thaw; method 9, SDS-lysozyme-bead-beating) were generated to extract the rumen bacterial DNA, besides, method 10, QIA amp DNA Stool Mini Kit, was also used as reference. The above 9 methods were compared and analyzed based on DNA concentration, purity, DNA electrophoretogram and 16S rRNA high throughput sequencing results, and the bacterial community of yak rumen was preliminarily identified based on the sequencing results.【Result】The comparison results of different DNA extraction methods efficiency showed that the combined beat-beating and freeze-thaw could significantly increase cell lysis efficiency and DNA yield under the same chemical and enzymatic conditions. Methods 3 and 6 obtained high DNA concentration and purity, methods 7, 8, 9, and 10 had lower volume of DNA than other methods because of the lack of CTAB. In addition to methods 2 and 8 as their PCR products were too weak or not detected, the PCR products of rest methods all had suitable objective strap size and concentration which met the requirements of 16S rRNA high throughput sequencing. After high throughput sequencing, a total of 191 349 raw reads were obtained, and 171 231 clean reads were obtained after quality control. Rare faction curves analysis showed that the amount of reads reached the saturation level, which could completely reflect the bacterial community species of the samples. OTU-based taxology and the diversity index analysis showed that methods 6 and 10 contained more abundant bacteria. The comparison of the effect of different extraction methods on Gram-positive bacteria showed that method 6 presented a comparatively higher capability in lysing cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria. Above all, the DNA yield, OTUs number, bacteria diversity, and excellent cell-breaking capability of method 6 (CTAB-Lysozyme- bead-beating) was better than that with other methods. The bacterial community structure analysis showed that the number of taxa in yak rumen contained approximately 21 phyla, 35 classes, 75 families, 112 genera. The bacteria community of higher abundance included Bacteroidtes (64%), Firmicutes (20%), Spirochaetae (2.3%), Proteobacteri (1.8%) and Fibrobacter (1.7%). Comparative analysis showed that there are some variation in the bacterial community between yaks and cattle, which may be attributed to different diets and habitats.【Conclusion】This study screened out an optimal DNA extraction method (method 6,CTAB-Lysozyme-Bead-beating) for yak rumen bacterial genome using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing, and the bacterial community structure of yak rumen was preliminarily evaluated. Results of the study provide a foundation for identifying the specificity of rumen microbial community and discovering distinct gene resource in yak.

Key words: yak, rumen microbe, DNA , extraction methods, bacteria community structure

[1]    Qiu Q, Zhang G J, Ma T, QIAN W B, WANG J Y, YE Z Q, CAO C C, HU QJ, JAEBUM K, DENIS M L, LORETTA A, BORIS C, MA J, HARRIS A L, QIAN X J, LANG Y S, ZHOU R, WANG L Z, WANG K, XIA J Q, LIAO S G, PAN S K, LU X, HOU H L, WANG Y, ZANG X T, YIN Y, MA H, ZHANG J, WANG Z F, ZHANG Y M, ZHANG D W, TAKAHIRO Y, MASAMI H, ZHONG Y, LIU W B, ZHANG Y, HUANG, Z Y, ZHANG S X, LONG R J, YANG H M, WANG J, JOHANNES A L, DAVID N C, WU Y, WANG J, SHI P, WANG J, LIU J Q. The yak genome and adaptation to life at high altitude. Nature Genetics, 2012, 44(8): 946-949.
[2]    ROSS EM, MOATE RJ, BARH CR, DAVIDSON S E, SAWBRIDGE T I, GUTHRIDGE K M, COCKS B G, HAYES B J. High throughput whole rumen metagenome profiling using untargeted massively parallel sequencing. BMC Genet, 2012, 13(53): 1-14..
[3]    GUAN L L, NKRUMAH J D, BASARAB J A, MOORE S S. Linkage of microbial ecology to the phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle’s feed efficiency. Fems Microbiology Letters 2008, 288(1): 85-91.
[4]    ZHOU M, HERNANDEZ-SANABRIA E, GUAN L L. Characterization of variation in rumen methanogenic communities, as determined by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(12): 3766-3786.
[5]    ZHANG T, SHAO M F, YE L. 454 Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity of activated sludge from 14 sewage treatment plants. Isme Journal Multidisciplinary Journal of Microbial Ecology 2012, 6(6): 1137-1147.
[6]    BIBBY K, VIAU E, PECCIA J. Pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to reveal bacterial pathogen diversity in biosolids. Water Research, 2010, 44(14): 4256-4260.
[7]    FOUTS D E, SZPAKOWSKI S, PURUSHE J, TORRALBA M, WATERMAN R C, MACNEIL M D, ALEXANDER L J, NELSON K E. Next generation sequencing to define prokaryotic and fungal diversity in the bovine rumen. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e48289.
[8]    OMONIYI L A, JEWELL K A, ISAH O A, NEUMANN A P, ONWUKA C F I, ONAGBESAN O M, SUEN G. An analysis of the ruminal bacterial microbiota in West African Dwarf sheep fed grass- and tree-based diets. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2014, 116(5): 1094-1095.
[9]    BERGMANN I, MUNDT K, SONTAG M, BAUMSTARK, NETTMANN E, KLOCKE M. Influence of DNA isolation on Q-PCR-based quantification of methanogenic Archaea in biogas fermenters. Systematic & Applied Microbiology, 2010, 33(2): 28-84.
[10]   MCORIST A L, JACCKSON M, BIRD A R. A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from hman faecal samples. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2002, 50(2): 131-139.
[11]   ARIEFDJOHAN M W, SAVAIANO D A, NAKASTSU C H. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens. Nutrition Journal, 2010, 22: 9-23.
[12]   YU Z, MORRISON M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal sample. Biotechniques, 2004, 36(5): 808-812.
[13]   GABRIELA V R, YEVANI V C, NAPOLEON G S, FLORENTINO A G, ERNESTINA G V, ALEJANDRO A P, MARCOS C J, VICTOR M B A, JUAN J V A. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods of rumen microbial populations. Word Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 29(2): 301-307.
[14]   HENDERSON G, COX F, KITTELMANN S, MIRI V H, ZETHOF M, NOEL S J, WAGHORN G C, JANSSEN P H. Effect of DNA extraction methods and sampling techniques on the apparent structure of cow and sheep rumen microbial communitie. Plos One, 2013, 8(9): e74787.
[15]   VANYSACKER L, DECLERCK S A, HELLEMANS B, MEESTER L D, VANKELECON I, DECLERCK P. Bacterial community analysis of activated sludge: an evaluation of four commonly used DNAextraction methods. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2010, 88(1): 299-307.
[16]   WEI G, PAN L, DU H, CHEN J Y, ZHAO L P. ERIC-PCR fingerprinting-based community DNA hybridization to pinpoint genome-specific fragments as molecular markers to identify and track populations common to healthy human guts. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2004, 59(1): 91-108.
[17]   李旦, 杨舒黎, 罗淑萍, 王加启.瘤胃微生物总DNA提取方法的比较. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(9): 1-5.
LI D, YANG S L, LUO S P, WANG J Q. Comparison methods of DNA extraction for rumen microbiology. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 22(9): 1-5. (in Chinese)
[18]   刘薇, 方国庆, 刘立成, 王志博, 王燕, 张永根.奶牛瘤胃微生物DNA提取法的研究与优化.中国畜牧杂志, 2011, 47(13): 71-75.
LIU W, FANG G Q, LIU L C, WANG Z B, WANG Y, ZHANG Y G. Study and optimization of DNA extraction method of rumen microorganisms in cow. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 47(13): 71-75. (in Chinese)
[19]   杨瑞红, 王加启, 罗淑萍, 董志扬.奶牛瘤胃微生物总DNA的提取和纯化. 新疆农业大学学报, 2005, 28(2): 39-42.
YANG R H, WANG J Q, LUO S P, DONG Z Y. Extraction and purification of DNA from environmental rumen samples. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2005, 28(2): 39-42. (in Chinese)
[20]   徐文华, 韩金涛, 蔡涛, 辛小玲, 白延琴, 刘超, 辛亚平. 秦川牛瘤胃微生物DNA提取方法的比较试验. 中国牛业科学, 2012, 38(6): 41-44.
XU W H, HAN J T, CAI T, XIN X L, BAI Y Q, LIU C, XIN Y P. Comparison of various methods for extracting Qinchuan cattle rumen microbial DNA. China Cattle Science, 2012, 38(6): 41-44.(in Chinese)
[21]   COLWELL R K, CODDINGTON J A. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1994, 345(1311): 101-118.
[22]   SCHLOSS P D, HANDELSMAN J. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for de?ning operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71(3): 1501-1506.
[23]   CHAO A, LEE S M. Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1992, 87(417): 210-217.
[24]   NICHOLAS J, GOTEL L. Ecology: Biodiversity in the scales. Nature, 2002, 419(6907): 575-576.
[25]   GUO W, LI Y, WANG L, WANG J W, XU Q, YAN T H, BAI X. Evaluation of composition and individual variability of rumen microbiota in yaks by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing technology. Anaerobe, 2015, 34: 74-79.
[26]   GUO T, ZHANG T. Biases during DNA extraction of activated sludge samples revealed by high throughput sequencing. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2013, 97(10): 4607-4616.
[27]   ZENED A, COMBES S, CAUQUIL L, MARIETTE J, KLOPP C, BOUNCHEZ, MEYNADIER A T, ENJALBERT F. microbial ecology of the rumen evaluated by 454 GS FLX pyrosequencing is affected by starch and oil supplementation. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 2013, 83(2): 504-514.
[28]   JAMI E, MIZRAHI I. Composition and simility of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals. PLoS One, 2012, 7(3): e33306.
[29]   JAMI E, MIZRAHI I. Similarity of the ruminal bacteria across individual lactating cows. Anaerobe, 2012, 18(3): 338-343.
[30]   PETRI RM, SCHWAIGER T, PENER G B, BEAUCHEMIN K A, FORSTER R J, MCKINNON J J, MCALLISTER T A. Characterization of the core rumen microbiome in cattle during transition from forage to concentrate as well as during and after acidotic challenge. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e83424.
[1] ZHAO ZiJie, SONG Hao, DONG XiaoOu, WAN JianMin. Progress in Transposable Element-Assisted Targeted Insertion of Large DNA Fragments [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1141-1156.
[2] LI YaYu, WANG XinLiang, ZHOU JinHuan, LI ChuXin, LI JiaXin, TIAN XuBin, SONG Zhen. Construction and Infectivity Identification of Genome-Length cDNA of Citrus Psorosis Virus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(17): 3451-3460.
[3] WU YuZhen, HUANG LongYu, ZHOU DaYun, HUANG YiWen, FU ShouYang, PENG Jun, KUANG Meng. Construction of SSR Fingerprint Library and Comprehensive Evaluation for Approved Cotton Varieties in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(8): 1430-1443.
[4] ZHAO ZhenJian, WANG Kai, CHEN Dong, SHEN Qi, YU Yang, CUI ShengDi, WANG JunGe, CHEN ZiYang, YU ShiXin, CHEN JiaMiao, WANG XiangFeng, TANG GuoQing. Integrated Aanalysis of Genome and DNA Methylation for Screening Key Genes Related to Pork Quality Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(7): 1394-1406.
[5] GAO ChenXi, HAO LuYang, HU Yue, LI YongXiang, ZHANG DengFeng, LI ChunHui, SONG YanChun, SHI YunSu, WANG TianYu, LI Yu, LIU XuYang. Analysis of Transposable Element Associated Epigenetic Regulation under Drought in Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(6): 1034-1048.
[6] MENG ZhaoYi, WANG YunLu, YAO YiLong, XI GuangYin, NIU JiaQiang, SOLANGSIZHU, GUO Min, XU YeFen. lncRNA-MSTRG.7889.1 Competitively Binds to bta-miR-146a Targeting Smad4 to Regulate Apoptosis of Yak Granulosa Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(4): 797-809.
[7] SU XiaoYu, TAN ZhengWei, LI ChunMing, LI Lei, LU DanDan, YU YongLiang, DONG Wei, AN SuFang, YANG Qing, SUN Yao, XU LanJie, YANG HongQi, LIANG HuiZhen. Analysis of Genome-Wide Methylation Differences and Associated Gene Expression of Sesame Varieties Under High Temperature Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(24): 4825-4838.
[8] ZHANG Peng, WANG MingXiu, JING KeMin, LI YuQian, TIAN Yuan, ZHONG JinCheng, CAI Xin. Cloning of PLZF Gene and Its Effects on the Proliferation of Undifferentiated Spermatogonia in Cattleyak [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(2): 390-402.
[9] SU GuoZhao, LI AiAi, LIU ZhongHua, CHEN YuHua, ZHANG XiuJie, MA YingXue, YANG XuHong, DENG Chao, XU ZhenJiang. Construction and Application of SSR Marker Identification System for Bitter Gourd Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(11): 2227-2242.
[10] LI Hui, ZHANG YuFeng, LI XiaoGang, WANG ZhongHua, LIN Jing, CHANG YouHong. Identification of Salt-Tolerant Transcription Factors in the Roots of Pyrus betulaefolia by the Association Analysis of Genome-Wide DNA Methylation and Transcriptome [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(7): 1377-1390.
[11] PAN YangYang, WANG JingLei, WANG Meng, WANG LiBin, ZHANG Qian, CHEN Rui, ZHANG TianTian, CUI Yan, XU GengQuan, FAN JiangFeng, YU SiJiu. Formation and Function of Paraspeckle During Pre-implantation Embryos Development in Yak [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(6): 1189-1203.
[12] LIN Ping, WANG KaiLiang, YAO XiaoHua, REN HuaDong. Development of DNA Molecular ID in Camellia oleifera Germplasm Based on Transcriptome-Wide SNPs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 217-235.
[13] DU BingChen, WANG Ming, LIU ChunGuo, WANG ShiDa, WEI XinYu, LU YaMan, SUN ZhenZhao, LIU ZaiSi, WEI LiLi, WANG JingFei, YANG DeCheng. Construction of Infectious cDNA Clone of GETV SC483 Strain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(17): 3479-3486.
[14] XUE YaPeng, DING YiBing, WANG YuZhuo, WANG XiaoDan, CAO XiaoNing, SANTRA Dipak K, CHEN Ling, QIAO ZhiJun, WANG RuiYun. Construction of DNA Molecular Identity Card of Core Germplasm of Broomcorn Millet in China Based on Fluorescence SSR [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(12): 2249-2261.
[15] CHEN YuMei, ZHANG CongCong, HU LiRong, FANG Hao, DOU JinHuan, GUO Gang, WANG Yan, LIU QiaoXiang, WANG YaChun, XU Qing. Effect of Heat Stress on DNA Methylation of GNAS Promoter Region in Dairy Cows [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(12): 2395-2406.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!