Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (18): 3566-3576.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.18.005

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of Drought Stress on Physiological Characteristics and Agronomic Traits at Bud Stage of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

BAI Peng, RAN Chun-yan, XIE Xiao-yu   

  1. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University /Key Laboratory of Eco-Environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, Ministry of Education / Engineering Research Center of South Upland Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400716
  • Received:2013-11-11 Revised:2014-02-22 Online:2014-09-16 Published:2014-09-16

Abstract: 【Objective】Against the characteristics of less precipitation which easily lead to drought in the Yangtze River Basin,especially in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River in the spring in recent years, the effects of water stress on physiological characters and agronomic traits at bud stage of rapeseed were studied, the aims were to reveal the drought resistance mechanism of rapeseed at bud stage, and to provide a theoretical basis for drought-resistant breeding. 【Method】The changes of associated physiological indicators and agronomic traits of rapeseed were studied by drought resistance coefficients of each character using two different drought resistance rapeseed varieties at bud stage (zhongshuang10 with low drought resistance and 94005 with high drought resistance) with drought stress experiment in pot. And filter out some indicators that apply to the local area, which can be used to identify drought resistance at bud stage of rapeseed.【Result】The results showed that the drought resistance coefficients ofnet photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, intercellular CO2 concentration, leaf relative water content, content of chlorophyll, RuBP carboxylase activity, height per plant, stem diameter, primary branches number and seed yield per plant tended to decrease with the extension of drought stress time, and the decrease range was positively related to the time of drought stress, the decrease range of the drought resistance coefficients of stomata conductance and transpiration rate was positively related to the drought resistant ability of rapeseed, the rest of the indicators were negatively related to the drought resistance coefficients of materials. The drought resistance coefficients ofstomata limitation value and water use efficiency of low drought resistance variety presented an upward to downward and downward trend, respectively, but both of that showed an increase trend in high drought resistance variety. With the lasting of drought stress, the relative values of POD, SOD, CAT activities and soluble sugar content and soluble protein content increased firstly and then decreased, and the increase range of the high drought resistance variety was higher than that of the low drought resistance variety. The relative values of cell membrane permeability, malondialdehyde (MDA) content and proline showed an upward trend with the prolonging of drought stress. The correlation analysis showed that the yield was significantly positively correlated with the drought resistance coefficients of net photosynthetic rate, leaf relative water content, chlorophyll content, RuBP carboxylase activity, height per plant, stem diameter and primary branches number, whereas it was significantly negatively correlated with the drought resistance coefficients of cell membrane permeability and MDA content. The principal component analysis divided the yield per plant, net photosynthetic rate, intercellular CO2 concentration, stomata limitation value, water use efficiency, relative water content, chlorophyll content, RuBP carboxylase, POD, SOD, CAT, cell membrane permeability, MDA, soluble sugar, height per plant, stem diameter and primary branches number into the first component and stomata conductance, transpiration rate, proline, and soluble protein were divided into the second component. 【Conclusion】After analyzing the relationship at related indicators of bud stage under drought stress and mature stage after rehydration, showed that, to improve the yield of rapeseed under drought stress, it is need to increase net photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll content, relative water content of rapeseed leaf in bud stage and primary branches number.The variation of each indicator in the first component correlated significantly to drought resistance. These indicators can be used as the principal indicators to identify the drought resistance of rapeseed at bud stage when breeding drought-tolerant rapeseed varieties, and the secondary indicators are in the second component.

Key words: rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), bud stage, drought stress, physiological characteristics, agronomic traits

[1]    王道杰, 桂月靖, 杨翠玲, 张书芬, 朱家成, 王建平. 油菜抗旱性及鉴定方法与指标Ⅲ. 油菜苗期抗旱性及鉴定指标筛选. 西北农业学报, 2012, 21(6): 108-113.
Wang D J, Gui Y J, Yang C L, Zhang S F, Zhu J C, Wang J P. Drought resistance and identification method and evaluation index in Brassica napus Ⅲ.Selection of drought resistance identification index of at seedling stage. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2012, 21(6): 108-113. (in Chinese)
[2]    杨春杰, 程勇, 邹崇顺, 张学昆, 郑普英, 李桂英, 杨畅. 模拟干旱胁迫下不同甘蓝型油菜品种发芽能力的配合力与遗传效应分析. 作物学报, 2008, 34(10): 1744 -1749.
Yang C J, Cheng Y, Zou C S, Zhang X K, Zheng P Y, Li G Y Yang C. Combining ability and genetic effects of germination ability in different Brassica napus L. cultivar under simulated drought stress. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(10): 1744 -1749. (in Chinese)
[3]    山仑, 康绍忠, 吴普特. 中国节水农业. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2004.
Shan L, Kang S Z, Wu P T. Water Saving Agriculture in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2004. (in Chinese)
[4]    张仁和, 郑友军, 马国胜, 张兴华, 路海东, 史俊通, 薛吉全. 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期叶片光合作用和保护酶的影响. 生态学报, 2011, 31(5): 1303-1311.
Zhang R H, Zheng Y J, Ma G S, Zhang X H, Lu H D, Shi J T, Xue J Q. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic traits and protective enzyme activity in maize seeding. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(5): 1303-1311. (in Chinese)
[5]    张仁和, 薛吉全, 浦军, 赵兵, 张兴华, 郑友军, 卜令铎. 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期植株生长和光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37(3): 521- 528.
Zhang R H, Xue J Q, Zhao B, Zhang X H, Zheng Y J, Bu L D. Influence of drought stress on plant growth and photosynthetic traits in maize deedlings. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(3): 521- 528. (in Chinese)
[6]    卜令铎, 张仁和, 常宇, 薛吉全, 韩苗苗. 苗期玉米叶片光合特性对水分胁迫的响应. 生态学报, 2010, 30(5): 1184-1191.
Bu L D, Zhang R H, Chang Y, Xue J Q, Han M M. Response of photosynthetic characteristics to water stress ofmaize leaf in seeding. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(5): 1184-1191. (in Chinese)
[7]    冯利平, 莫志鸿, 黄晚华. 湖南省季节性干旱对双季稻生长及产量影响的模拟研究. 作物学报, 2011, 37(5): 895-902.
Feng L P, Mo Z H, Huang W H. A simulated study on the effects of seasonal drought on growth and yield of double cropping rice in Hunan province. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(5): 895-902. (in Chinese)
[8]    杨永杰, 张彩霞, 宋建, 熊杰, 王熹, 章秀福, 符冠富, 陶龙兴. 花期干旱胁迫对籼稻近等基因系水分和光合生理的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(7): 1481-1491.
Yang Y J, Zhang C X, Song J, Xiong J, Wang X, Zhang X F, Fu G F, Tao L X. Effects of drought stress on water and photosynthetic physiology activities of near-isogenic indica rice lines at flowering stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(7): 1481-1491. (in Chinese)
[9]    宋雯雯, 李文滨, 韩雪, 高慕娟, 王继安. 干旱胁迫下大豆幼苗根系基因的表达谱分析. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(22): 4579-4586.
Song W W, Li W B, Han X, Gao M J, Wang J A. Analysis of gene expression profiles in soybean roots under drought stress. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(22): 4579-4586. (in Chinese)
[10]   崔维佳, 常志云, 李宁. 干旱胁迫对大豆生理生态及产量的影响. 水资源与水工程学报, 2013, 24(4): 20-24.
Chui W J, Chang Z Y, Li N. Effect of drought stress on physiology ecology and yield of soybean. Journal of Water Resources Water Engineering, 2013, 24(4): 20-24. (in Chinese)
[11]   乔振江, 蔡昆争, 骆世明. 低磷和干旱胁迫对大豆植株干物质积累及磷效率的影响.生态学报, 2011, 31(19): 5578-5587.
Qiao Z J, Cai K Z, Luo S M. Interactive effects of low phosphorus and drought stress on dry matter accumulation and phosphorus efficiency of soybean plants. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19): 5578-5587. (in Chinese)
[12]   姜小凤, 王淑英, 李倩, 苏敏. 水分胁迫对春小麦陇春27号光合参数和渗透调节物质的影响. 核农学报, 2013, 27(5): 0698-0702.
Jiang X F, Wang S Y, Li Q, Su M. Effect of water stress on photosynthetic parameters and osmotic regulators in spring wheat Longchun 27. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 27(5): 0698-0702. (in Chinese)
[13]   王志强, 梁威威, 范雯雯, 林同保. 不同土壤肥力下冬小麦春季干旱的复水补偿效应.中国农业科学, 2011, 44(8): 1628-1636.
Wang Z Q, Liang W W, Fan W W, Li T B. Studies on compensation effects of rewatering on winter wheat suffering from droughts during spring under different soil fertility conditions. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(8): 1628-1636. (in Chinese)
[14]   付秋实, 李红岭, 崔健, 赵冰, 郭仰东. 水分胁迫对辣椒光合作用及相关生理特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(5): 1859-1866.
Fu Q S, Li H L, Cui J. Effects of water stress on photosynthesis and associated physiological characters of Capsicum annuum L . Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(5): 1859-1866. (in Chinese)
[15]   欧立军, 陈波, 邹学校. 干旱对辣椒光合作用及相关生理特性的影响. 生态学报, 2012, 32(8): 2612-2619.
Zou L J, Chen B, Zou X X. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and associated physiological characters of pepper. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(8): 2612-2619. (in Chinese)
[16]   Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra S M A. Plant drought stress: effect, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2009, 29: 185-212.
[17]   张宪政, 苏正淑. 作物水分亏缺伤害生理研究概况. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1996, 27(1): 85-91.
Zhang X Z, Su Z S. Introductin of researches into physiologic damages to crop under water deficit. Journal of Shenyang Agrieultural University, 1996, 27(1): 85-91. (in Chinese)
[18]   覃 鹏, 刘飞虎, 梁雪妮.超氧化物歧化酶与植物抗逆性. 黑龙江农业科学, 2002(1): 31-34.
Qin P, Liu F H, Liang X N. Superoxide dismutase and plant resistance to the environmental stress. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2002(1): 31-34. (in Chinese)
[19]   张静, 崔颖, 孙尧, 颜梅, 胡立勇. 不同程度干旱胁迫对油菜种子萌发及幼苗生长特性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(2): 164-179.
Zhang J, Cui J, Sun Y, Yan M, Hu L Y. Effect of different degree of drought stress on germination and seedling growth of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(2): 164-179. (in Chinese)
[20]   李真, 梅淑芳, 梅忠, 刘芳, 周广生, 吴江生. 甘蓝型油菜DH群体苗期抗旱性的评价. 作物学报, 2012, 38(11): 2108 -2114.
Li Z, Mei S F, Mei Z, Liu F, Zhou G S, Wu J S. Evaluation of drought resistance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) DH lines at seedling stage. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(11): 2108 -2114. (in Chinese)
[21]   谢小玉, 张霞, 张兵. 油菜苗期抗旱性评价及抗旱相关指标变化分析. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(3): 476-485.
Xie X Y, Zhang X, Zhang B. Evaluation of drought resistance and analysis of variation of relevant parameters at seedling stage of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(3): 476-485. (in Chinese)
[22]   张弢. PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫对油菜幼苗生理生化指标的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(20): 10363-10364, 10379.
Zhang T. Effects of PEG6000-simulated drought stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics of rape seedlings. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(20): 10363-10364, 10379. (in Chinese)
[23]   李震, 吴北京, 陆光远, 程勇, 邹崇顺, 张学昆. 不同基因型油菜对苗期水分胁迫的生理响应. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34(1): 33-39.
Li Z, Wu B J, Lu G Y, Cheng Y, Zou C S, Zhang X K. Differences in physiological responses of Brassica napus genotypes under water stress during seedling stage. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2012, 34(1): 33-39. (in Chinese)
[24]   蒙祖庆, 宋丰萍, 刘振兴, 张方凯. 干旱及复水对油菜苗期光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34(1): 40-47.
Meng Z Q, Song F P, Liu Z X, Zhang F K. Effects of drought and rewatering at seedling stage on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in rapeseed. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2012, 34(1): 40-47. (in Chinese)
[25]   赵丽英, 王伟, 宋玉伟. 土壤水分胁迫下油菜光合特性变化和膜伤害研究. 河南农业科学, 2010(8): 33-35.
Zhao L Y, Wang W, Song Y W. Changes of photosynthesis and membrane damage of Brassica napus L. under soil water stress. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2010(8): 33-35. (in Chinese)
[26]   Ardestani H G, Rad A H S. Impact of regulated deficit irrigation on the physiological characteristics of two rapeseed varieties as affected by different potassium rates. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2012, 11(24): 6510-6519.
[27]   Eslam B P. Evaluation of physiological indices, yield and its components as screening techniques for water deficit tolerance in oilseed rape cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2009, 11: 413-422.
[28]   Kumar A, Singh D P. Use of physiological indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in oilseed Brassica species. Annals of Botany, 1998, 81: 413-420.
[29]   李震, 杨春杰, 张学昆, 邹崇顺, 程勇, 郑普英, 李桂英. PEG 胁迫下甘蓝型油菜品种(系)种子发芽耐旱性鉴定. 中国油料作物学报, 2008, 30(4): 438-442.
Li Z, Yang C J, Zhang X K, Zou C S, Cheng Y, Zheng P Y, Li G Y. Evaluation of drought tolerance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) during germination under PEG6000 stress. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2008, 30(4): 438-442. (in Chinese)
[30]   张霞, 谢小玉. PEG 胁迫下甘蓝型油菜种子萌发期抗旱鉴定指标的研究. 西北农业学报, 2012, 21(2): 72-77.
Zhang X, Xie X Y. Studies on identification indexes of drought resistance by PEG during seed germination of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2012, 21(2): 72-77. (in Chinese)
[31]   瞿益民, 唐合年, 葛妹兰, 吴坚. 油菜需水量试验分析. 江苏水利, 2005(10): 18-21.
Qu Y M, Tang H N, Ge M L, Wu J. Experimental analysis of water demand of rapeseed. Journal of Jiangsu Water Conservation, 2005(10): 18-21. (in Chinese)
[32]   冯诚, 杨静, 方小宇, 李长江. 黔中地区非充分灌溉条件下油菜耗水规律研究. 节水灌溉, 2011(5): 12-16.
Feng C, Yang J, Fang X Y, Li C J. Research on water consumpation law of rape under non-sufficient irrigation in mid-Guizhou. Journal of Water Saving Irrigation, 2011(5): 12-16. (in Chinese)
[33]   李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
Li H S. Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological Biochemical Experiment. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2006. (in Chinese)
[34]   时丽冉. 水分胁迫对小黑麦光合性能及水分利用率的影响. 衡水学院学报, 2011, 13(4): 53-57.
Shi L R. The effect of water stress on photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of various triticale. Journal of Hengshui University, 2011, 13(4): 53-57. (in Chinese)
[35]   Horváth E, Pál M, Szalai G, Páldi E, Janda T. Exogenous 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and salicylic acid modulate the effect of short term drought and freezing stress on wheat plants. Biologia Plantarum, 2007, 51: 480-487. 
[36]   时丽冉, 刘志华. 干旱胁迫对苣荬菜抗氧化酶和渗透调节物质的影响. 草地学报, 2010, 18(5): 673-677.
Shi L R, Liu Z H. Influences of drought stress on antioxidative activity and osmoregulation substance of Sonchus brachyotus DC.. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(5): 673-677. (in Chinese)
[37]   Chaves M M, Oliveira M M. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2005, 55(407): 2365-2384.
[38]   Ashraf M. Iram A. Drought stress induced changes in some organic substances in nodules and other plant parts of two potential legumes differing in salt tolerance. Flora, 2005, 200(6): 535-546.
[39]   安玉艳, 梁宗锁, 郝文芳. 杠柳幼苗对不同强度干旱胁迫的生长与生理响应. 生态学报, 2011, 31(3): 716-725.
An Y Y, Liang Z S, Hao W F. Growth and physiological responses of the periploca sepium Bunge seedlings to drought stress. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2011, 31(3): 716-725. (in Chinese)
[40]   Pinheiro C, Chaves M M, Ricardo C P. Alterations in carbon and nitrogen metabolism induced by water deficit in the stems and leaves of Lupinus abuls L. Journal of Experimental Botany, 200l, 52: 1063-1070.
[41]   Patakas A, Nikolsou N, Zioziou E, Radoglou K, Noitsakis B. The role of organic solute and ion accumulism osmotic adjustment in drought-stressed grapevines . Plant Science, 2002, 163: 361-367.
[42]   张智猛, 戴良香, 宋文武, 丁红, 慈敦伟, 康涛, 宁堂原, 万书波. 干旱处理对花生品种叶片保护酶活性和渗透物质含量的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39(1): 133-141.
Zhang Z M, Dai L X, Song W W, Ding H, Ci D W, Kang T, Ning T Y, Wan S B. Effect of drought stresses at different growth stages on peanut leaf protective enzyme activities and osmoregulation substances content. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(1): 133-141. (in Chinese)
[43]   蔡昆争, 吴学祝, 骆世明. 不同生育期水分胁迫对水稻根叶渗透调节物质变化的影响. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 491-500.
Cai K Z, Wu X Z, Luo S M, Effects of water stress on osmolytes at different growth stages in rice leaves and roots. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 2008, 32(2): 491-500. (in Chinese)
[44]   祁旭升, 王兴荣, 许军, 张建平, 米君. 胡麻种质资源成株期抗旱性评价. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(15): 3076-3087.
Qi X S, Wang X R, Xu J, Zhang J P, Mi J. Drought-resistance evaluation of flax germplasm at adult plant stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(15): 3076-3087. (in Chinese)
[1] HU Sheng,LI YangYang,TANG ZhangLin,LI JiaNa,QU CunMin,LIU LieZhao. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of the Changes in Oil Content and Protein Content Under Drought Stress in Brassica napus L. [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 17-30.
[2] DONG SangJie,JIANG XiaoChun,WANG LingYu,LIN Rui,QI ZhenYu,YU JingQuan,ZHOU YanHong. Effects of Supplemental Far-Red Light on Growth and Abiotic Stress Tolerance of Pepper Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1189-1198.
[3] LI Ning,LIU Kun,LIU TongTong,SHI YuGang,WANG ShuGuang,YANG JinWen,SUN DaiZhen. Identification of Wheat Circular RNAs Responsive to Drought Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4583-4599.
[4] LIU Hao,PANG Jie,LI HuanHuan,QIANG XiaoMan,ZHANG YingYing,SONG JiaWen. Effects of Foliar-Spraying Selenium Coupled with Soil Moisture on the Yield and Quality of Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4433-4444.
[5] XU Ke,FAN ZhiLong,YIN Wen,ZHAO Cai,YU AiZhong,HU FaLong,CHAI Qiang. Coupling Effects of N-fertilizer Postponing Application and Intercropping on Maize Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4131-4143.
[6] LI Gang,BAI Yang,JIA ZiYing,MA ZhengYang,ZHANG XiangChi,LI ChunYan,LI Cheng. Phosphorus Altered the Response of Ionomics and Metabolomics to Drought Stress in Wheat Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 280-294.
[7] RU Chen,HU XiaoTao,LÜ MengWei,CHEN DianYu,WANG WenE,SONG TianYuan. Effects of Nitrogen on Nitrogen Accumulation and Distribution, Nitrogen Metabolizing Enzymes, Protein Content, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat Under Heat and Drought Stress After Anthesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3303-3320.
[8] MENG Yu,WEN PengFei,DING ZhiQiang,TIAN WenZhong,ZHANG XuePin,HE Li,DUAN JianZhao,LIU WanDai,FENG Wei. Identification and Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Wheat Varieties Based on Thermal Infrared Image [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2538-2551.
[9] ZHU FangFang,DONG YaHui,REN ZhenZhen,WANG ZhiYong,SU HuiHui,KU LiXia,CHEN YanHui. Over-expression of ZmIBH1-1 to Improve Drought Resistance in Maize Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4500-4513.
[10] XUE RenFeng,FENG Ming,HUANG YuNing,Matthew BLAIR,Walter MESSIER,GE WeiDe. Effects of PvEG261 Gene on the Fusarium Wilt and Drought- Resistance in Common Bean [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4274-4285.
[11] FAN Tao,LI Zhi,JIANG Qing,CHEN ShuLin,OU Xia,CHEN YongYan,REN TianHeng. Development and Effect Evaluation of KASP Markers Closely Linked to Major QTLs of Spike Number Per Unit Area and Grain Length in Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(14): 2941-2951.
[12] LI Hui,HAN ZhanPin,HE LiXia,YANG YaLing,YOU ShuYan,DENG Lin,WANG ChunGuo. Cloning and Functional Analysis of BraERF023a Under Salt and Drought Stresses in Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(1): 152-163.
[13] ZHANG LongYan,CHENG GongMin,WEI HengLing,WANG HanTao,LU JianHua,MA ZhiYing,YU ShuXun. Chilling Tolerance Identification and Response to Cold Stress of Gossypium hirsutum Varieties (Lines) During Germination Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(1): 19-33.
[14] LIU WenJuan,CHANG LiJuan,YUE LiJie,SONG Jun,ZHANG FuLi,WANG Dong,WU JiaWei,GUO LingAn,LEI ShaoRong. Response of Non-Photochemical Quenching in Bundle Sheath Chloroplasts of Two Maize Hybrids to Drought Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1532-1544.
[15] HaiYan ZHANG,BeiTao XIE,BaoQing WANG,ShunXu DONG,WenXue DUAN,LiMing ZHANG. Effects of Drought Treatments at Different Growth Stages on Growth and the Activity of Antioxidant Enzymes in Sweetpotato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(6): 1126-1139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!