Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2011, Vol. 10 Issue (10): 1532-1536    DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60148-X
GENETICS & BREEDING · GERMPLASM RESOURCES · MOLECULAR GENETICS Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Analysis of SSRs Information in Capsicum spp. from EST Database
 HUANG Huan-huan, ZHANG Zhong-hua, ZHANG Zheng-hai, MAO Sheng-li, WANG Li-hao , ZHANG Bao-xi
1.Key Laboratory of Vegetable Genetics and Physiology, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  SSR markers are useful in pepper linkage mapping and gene location. 446 SSR markers have been reported, but they are insufficient. It is costly to develop SSR markers from DNA library, whereas it seems much easy to find in EST sequences in the GenBank of pepper through internet. In this study, attempts have been made to develop SSR markers in the EST sequences by using bioinformatics. EST sequences were trimmed by ‘est-trimmer.pl’ software, while 116915 EST sequences were obtained without poly ‘A’ or poly ‘T’, ranged between 100 and 700 bp. Using ‘e-PCR’ and ‘del.pl’ softwares, SSR sequences were identified. 2 508 microsatellite loci (larger than 20 repeats) were established and 755 SSR primers were designed using SSR finder software and Primer 3 software. There were 498 (0.43%) mono-, 1 026 (0.89%) di-, 518 (0.45%) tri-, 245 (0.21%) tetra-, 114 (0.10%) penta-, and 107 (0.09%) hexa-nucleotide SSRs. The estimated frequency of SSRs was approximately 1/25.12 kb. According to the distribution of SSRs in pepper, the mean length of pepper SSRs was 22.68 bp and the adenine rich repeats such as A/T, AG, AT, AAG, AAAT, and AAAC were predominant in each type of SSRs (mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-), whereas the C/G, CG, CCG repeats were less abundant. 210 primers were tested in 8 pepper cultivars and the PCR result revealed the existence of polymorphism among 127 (60.48%) SSR primers within 8 pepper cultivars. It is confirmed that pepper EST database could be efficiently exploited for availability of SSR markers.

Abstract  SSR markers are useful in pepper linkage mapping and gene location. 446 SSR markers have been reported, but they are insufficient. It is costly to develop SSR markers from DNA library, whereas it seems much easy to find in EST sequences in the GenBank of pepper through internet. In this study, attempts have been made to develop SSR markers in the EST sequences by using bioinformatics. EST sequences were trimmed by ‘est-trimmer.pl’ software, while 116915 EST sequences were obtained without poly ‘A’ or poly ‘T’, ranged between 100 and 700 bp. Using ‘e-PCR’ and ‘del.pl’ softwares, SSR sequences were identified. 2 508 microsatellite loci (larger than 20 repeats) were established and 755 SSR primers were designed using SSR finder software and Primer 3 software. There were 498 (0.43%) mono-, 1 026 (0.89%) di-, 518 (0.45%) tri-, 245 (0.21%) tetra-, 114 (0.10%) penta-, and 107 (0.09%) hexa-nucleotide SSRs. The estimated frequency of SSRs was approximately 1/25.12 kb. According to the distribution of SSRs in pepper, the mean length of pepper SSRs was 22.68 bp and the adenine rich repeats such as A/T, AG, AT, AAG, AAAT, and AAAC were predominant in each type of SSRs (mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-), whereas the C/G, CG, CCG repeats were less abundant. 210 primers were tested in 8 pepper cultivars and the PCR result revealed the existence of polymorphism among 127 (60.48%) SSR primers within 8 pepper cultivars. It is confirmed that pepper EST database could be efficiently exploited for availability of SSR markers.
Keywords:  pepper      expressed sequence tags      microsatellite      bioinformatics      e-PCR  
Received: 16 September 2010   Accepted:
Fund: 

This work was financially supported by the Core Research Budget of the Non-Profit Governmental Research Institution (ICS, CAAS) (0032007216 and 201011), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30800752), and the Key Laboratory of Vegetable Genetics and Physiology, Ministry of Agriculture, China.

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence ZHANG Bao-xi, Professor, E-mail: zhangbx@mail.caas.net.cn; WANG Li-hao, Associate Professor, E-mail: wanglh@mail.caas.net.cn     E-mail:  wanglh@mail.caas.net.cn
About author:  HUANG Huan-huan, Ph D candidate, Tel: +86-10-82109551, E-mail: hh820423@163.com

Cite this article: 

HUANG Huan-huan, ZHANG Zhong-hua, ZHANG Zheng-hai, MAO Sheng-li, WANG Li-hao , ZHANG Bao-xi. 2011. Analysis of SSRs Information in Capsicum spp. from EST Database. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 10(10): 1532-1536.

[1]Hackauf, B, Wehling P. 2002. Identification of microsatellite polymorphisms in an expressed portion of the rye genome. Plant Breed, 121, 17-25.

[2]Huang S W, Zhang B X, Milbourne D, Cardle L, Yang G M, Guo J Z. 2001. Development of pepper SSR markers from sequence databases. Euphytica, 117, 163-167.

[3]Kijas J M H, Fowler J S, Thomas M R. 1995. An evaluation of sequence tagged microsatellitesite markers for genetic analysis within citrus and related species. Genome, 38, 349-355.

[4]Kirill R, Wonhee J, Gregory D. 2004. A web server for performing electronic PCR. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 108-112.

[5]Mauricio L R, Ramesh V K, Ju K Y, Mark E S. 2005. Nonrandom distribution and frequenciesof genomic and EST-derived microsatellite markers in rice, wheat, and barley. BMC Genomics, 6, 23. Miyao A, Zhong H S, Monna L, Masahiro Y, Yamamoto K, Ilkka H, Yuzo M, Takuji S. 1996. Characterization and genetic mapping of simple sequence repeats in the rice genome. DNA Research, 3, 233-238.

[6]Nagy I, Sasvári S, Stágel A, Ács S, Bárdos G. 2004. Occurrence and polymorphism of microsatellite repeats in the sequence databases in pepper. In: Proceeding th Meeting on Genetics and Breeding of Capsicum and Eggplant. Noordwijkerhout, The Netherland. pp. 17-19.

[7]Pillen K, Binder A, Kreuzkam B, Ramsay L, Waugh R, Forster J, Leon J. 2000. Mapping new EMBL-derived barley microsatellites and their use in differentiating German barley cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 101, 652-660.

[8]Portis E, Nagy I, Sasvári Z, Stágel A, Barchi L, Lanteri S. 2007. The design of Capsicum spp. SSR assays via analysis of in silico DNA sequence, and their potential utility for genetic mapping. Plant Science, 172, 640-648.

[9]Schuler G D. 1997. Sequence Mapping by electronic PCR. Genome Research, 7, 541-550.

[10]Schuler G D. 1998. Electronic PCR: bridging the gap between genome mapping and genome sequencing. Trends in Biotechnology, 16, 456-459.

[11]Scott K D, Eggler P, Seaton G, Rossetto M, Ablett E M, Lee S L, Henry R J. 2000. Analysis of SSRs derived from grape ESTs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 100, 723-726.

[12]Stágel A, Portis E, Nagy L, Sasvári Z, Barchi L, Lanteri S. 2007. Microsatellite loci derived from database sequences in Capsicum spp. and their potential utility for mapping. In: Niemirowicz-Szczytt K, ed., Progress in Research on Capsicum & Eggplant. Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. pp. 427-437.

[13]Thiel T, Michalek W, Varshney R K, Graner A. 2003. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetic, 106, 411-422.

[14]Wang L H, Zhang B X, Du Y C. 2005. Review of research on genes molecular locating and molecular linkage mapping in pepper. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 6, 176-183. (in Chinese) [15]Wu F N, Eannetta N T, Xu Y M, Durrett R, Mazourek M, Jahn M, Tanksley S. 2009. A COSII genetic map of the pepper genome provides a detailed picture of synteny with tomato and new insights into recent chromosome evolution in the genus Capsicum. Theoretical and Applied Genetic, 118, 1279- 1293.

[16]Wu F N, Mueller L A, Crouzillat D, Petiard V, Tanksley S D. 2006. Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: A test case in the euasterid plant clade. Genetics, 174, 1407-1420.
[1] WANG Meng-qi, ZHANG Hong-rui, XI Yu-qiang, WANG Gao-ping, ZHAO Man, ZHANG Li-juan, GUO Xian-ru. Population genetic variation and historical dynamics of the natural enemy insect Propylea japonica (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2456-2469.
[2] YIN Yue-yan, HUA Meng-ying, ZHAO Kuang-jie, WAN Qiong-lian, BU Shan, LU Yu-wen, ZHENG Hong-ying, RAO Shao-fei, YAN Fei, PENG Jie-jun, CHEN Hai-ru, CHEN Jian-ping. Construction of chimeric viruses based on pepper mild mottle virus using a modified Cre/loxP system[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8): 2456-2463.
[3] LIU Lei, WANG Heng-bo, LI Yi-han, CHEN Shu-qi, WU Ming-xing, DOU Mei-jie, QI Yi-yin, FANG Jing-ping, ZHANG Ji-sen. Genome-wide development of interspecific microsatellite markers for Saccharum officinarum and Saccharum spontaneum[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3230-3244.
[4] Hakan FIDAN, Pelin SARIKAYA, Kubra YILDIZ, Bengi TOPKAYA, Gozde ERKIS, Ozer CALIS. Robust molecular detection of the new Tomato brown rugose fruit virus in infected tomato and pepper plants from Turkey[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(8): 2170-2179.
[5] WU Li-hong, ZHOU Cao, LONG Gui-yun, YANG Xi-bin, WEI Zhi-yan, LIAO Ying-jiang, YANG Hong, HU Chao-xing . Fitness of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda to three solanaceous vegetables[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(3): 755-763.
[6] GAO Yuan, WANG Da-jiang, WANG Kun, CONG Pei-hua, LI Lian-wen, PIAO Ji-cheng. Analysis of genetic diversity and structure across a wide range of germplasm reveals genetic relationships among seventeen species of Malus Mill. native to China [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(12): 3186-3198.
[7] LI Yu-dong, WANG Wei-jia, LI Zi-wei, WANG Ning, XIAO Fan, GAO Hai-he, GUO Huai-shun, LI Hui, WANG Shou-zhi. Integration of association and computational methods reveals functional variants of LEPR gene for abdominal fat content in chickens[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(10): 2734-2748.
[8] FANG Zheng-wu, HE Yi-qin, LIU Yi-ke, JIANG Wen-qiang, SONG Jing-han, WANG Shu-ping, MA Dong-fang, YIN Jun-liang. Bioinformatic identification and analyses of the non-specific lipid transfer proteins in wheat[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(5): 1170-1185.
[9] YUAN Xi-sen, YU Zi-peng, LIU Lin, XU Yang, ZHANG Lei, HAN De-guo, ZHANG Shi-zhong.
Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of asparagine synthetase family in apple
[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(5): 1261-1273.
[10] YANG Fang-yuan, GUO Jian-jun, LIU Ning, ZHANG Run-zhi.
Genetic structure of the invasive Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata populations in China
[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(2): 350-359.
[11] DU Zhi-xuan, HAO Hui-ying, HE Jin-peng, WANG Jian-ping, HUANG Zhou, XU Jie, FU Hai-hui, FU Jun-ru, HE Hao-hua. GraS is critical for chloroplast development and affects yield in rice [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(11): 2603-2615.
[12] WU Huai-heng, WAN Peng, HUANG Min-song, LEI Chao-liang. Microsatellites reveal strong genetic structure in the common cutworm, Spodoptera litura[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(3): 636-643.
[13] YANG Juan, YU Hai-yan, LI Xiang-ju, DONG Jin-gao. Genetic diversity and population structure of Commelina communis in China based on simple sequence repeat markers[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(10): 2292-2301.
[14] TU Ke-ling, LI Lin-juan, YANG Li-ming, WANG Jian-hua, SUN Qun. Selection for high quality pepper seeds by machine vision and classifiers[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(09): 1999-2006.
[15] SONG Yang, LIU Hong-di, ZHOU Qiang, ZHANG Hong-jun, ZHANG Zhi-dong, LI Ya-dong, WANG Hai-bo, LIU Feng-zhi. High-throughput sequencing of highbush blueberry transcriptome and analysis of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(03): 591-604.
No Suggested Reading articles found!