垄作直播控制灌溉对水稻产量和温室气体排放的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.04.009

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Paddy fields are one of the important sources of greenhouse gas emissions, while farming practices and water management can reduce greenhouse gas emissions from field to a certain extent. Ridge cultivation and direct-seeding is a new kind of rice planting pattern that saves costs and increases economic efficiency. The impact of water management of ridge cultivation and control irrigation on grain yield and greenhouse gas emissions were explored for increasing grain yield and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, so as to provide a theoretical basis and technical approaches for the innovation of high-yield and emission-reduction. 【Method】In this study, a rice-radish rotation system under the ridge cultivation from 2019 to 2021 was conducted to use as the research object. Four treatments were set up, including traditional flooded furrow irrigation (TFI: the height of irrigation was about 5 cm above the ridge), controlled furrow irrigation 1 (CFI1: the height of irrigation was about 5 cm below the ridge), controlled furrow irrigation 2 (CFI2: the height of irrigation was about 10 cm below the ridge), and control furrow irrigation 3 (CFI3: the height of irrigation was about 15 cm below the ridge). The greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential (GWP) of rice-radish season were investigated by airtight static box-gas chromatography, and the rice yield, soil reducing substances, ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen were measured. Finally, the optimal irrigation patterns were identified with both reducing the GWP and increasing the rice yield. 【Result】Based on the three-year experimental results, compared with TFI treatment, controlled irrigation could significantly reduce the cumulative emission of CH₄ by 22.81%-78.47% in the rice season, of which CFI3 had the most significant effect; CFI2 treatment significantly increased the cumulative emission of N₂O by 20.45%-59.90%, CFI3 significantly reduced the cumulative N₂O emissions by 12.08%-68.64%, and CFI1 had no significant effect on the cumulative N₂O emissions. For radish season, compared with TFI controlled irrigation could significantly reduce the cumulative emission of CH₄ by 34.87%-53.31%, among which CFI2 and CFI3 had the most significant effects; CFI1, CFI2 and CFI3 treatments could significantly increase the cumulative emission of N₂O by 35.00%-120.00%. The results of two-way ANOVA showed that control irrigation, the interaction of control irrigation and year had an extremely significance on the cumulative emission of CH₄ (P<0.01). The control irrigation, year, the interaction of control irrigation and year had an extremely significance on cumulative N₂O emissions (P<0.01). Compared with TFI, controlled irrigation treatment could significantly reduce GWP by 20.24%-74.87% in rice season; CFI1 and CFI2 treatments increased rice yield by 12.34%-33.97%, CFI3 treatment had no significant effect on yield. Controlling irrigation reduced GHGI by 29.37%-75.92%. Controlled irrigation affected CH₄ emissions by reducing the total amount of reducing substances, active reducing substances and reducing Fe²⁺ by 15.00%-30.84%, 53.45%-71.65% and 60.47%, respectively. It also affected N₂O emissions by reducing NH₄⁺ by 7.51%-9.87% and increasing NO₃^- by 5.81%-8.55%. 【Conclusion】Controlled irrigation affected GHG emissions through soil properties such as NO₃^-, NH₄⁺, and reducing substances. Therefore, CFI1 and CFI2 had the best effects in terms of reducing GWP and increasing rice yield. Under the conditions of ridge cultivation and direct-seeding in paddy field, the depth of irrigation with two-thirds or half of the depth of traditional furrow irrigation flooding was the best water management method to alleviate greenhouse gas emissions and increase rice production.

Key words: ridge cultivation, direct-seeding, water management, greenhouse gas, rice, radish

XIE Jun, YIN XueWei, WEI Ling, WANG ZiFang, LI QingHu, ZHANG XiaoChun, LU YuanYuan, WANG QiuYue, GAO Ming. Effects of Control Irrigation on Grain Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Ridge Cultivation Direct-Seeding Paddy Field[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(4): 697-710.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 3

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Table 4

Table 2

References 44

[1]	IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
[2]	IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[3]	ZOU J W, HUANG Y, QIN Y M, LIU S W, SHEN Q R, PAN G X, LU Y Y, LIU Q H. Changes in fertilizer-induced direct N₂O emissions from paddy fields during rice-growing season in China between 1950s and 1990s. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15(1): 229-242. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01775.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01775.x.
[4]	WANG H, ZHANG Y, ZHANG Y J, MCDANIEL M D, SUN L, SU W, FAN X R, LIU S H, XIAO X. Water-saving irrigation is a ‘win-win’ management strategy in rice paddies - With both reduced greenhouse gas emissions and enhanced water use efficiency. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 228: 105889. doi:10.1016/j. agwat.2019.105889. doi: 10.1016/j. agwat.2019.105889.
[5]	ZHONG C, LIU Y, XU X T, YANG B J, AAMER M, ZHANG P, HUANG G Q. Paddy-upland rotation with Chinese milk vetch incorporation reduced the global warming potential and greenhouse gas emissions intensity of double rice cropping system. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 276: 116696. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116696. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116696.
[6]	JIANG Y, LIAO P, VAN GESTEL N, SUN Y N, ZENG Y J, HUANG S, ZHANG W J, VAN GROENIGEN K J. Lime application lowers the global warming potential of a double rice cropping system. Geoderma, 2018, 325: 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.03.034. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.03.034.
[7]	LIU S W, ZHANG L, JIANG J Y, CHEN N N, YANG X M, XIONG Z Q, ZOU J W. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice seedling nurseries under flooding and moist irrigation regimes in Southeast China. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 426: 166-171. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.003. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.003.
[8]	熊丽萍, 吴家梅, 纪雄辉, 彭华, 李尝君. 水旱轮作系统中土壤CH₄和N₂O排放研究进展. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4): 863-871. doi:10.11654/jaes.2020-0101. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0101.
	XIONG L P, WU J M, JI X H, PENG H, LI C J. A review on soil CH₄ and N₂O emissions from paddy-upland rotation systems. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(4): 863-871. doi:10.11654/jaes.2020-0101. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0101.
[9]	CAI Z C, TSURUTA H, GAO M, XU H, WEI C F. Options for mitigating methane emission from a permanently flooded rice field. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9(1): 37-45. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486. 2003.00562.x. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00562.x.
[10]	郑华斌, 姚林, 刘建霞, 贺慧, 陈阳, 黄璜. 种植方式对水稻产量及根系性状的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(4): 667-677. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00667. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00667.
	ZHENG H B, YAO L, LIU J X, HE H, CHEN Y, HUANG H. Effect of ridge & terraced cultivation on rice yield and root trait. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(4): 667-677. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00667. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006. 2014.00667.
[11]	DELLA LUNGA D, BRYE K R, SLAYDEN J M, HENRY C G, WOOD L S. Relationships among soil factors and greenhouse gas emissions from furrow-irrigated Rice in the mid-southern, USA. Geoderma Regional, 2021, 24: e00365. doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00365. doi: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00365.
[12]	CHEN L M, YI Y H, WANG W X, ZENG Y J, TAN X M, WU Z M, CHEN X F, PAN X H, SHI Q H, ZENG Y H. Innovative furrow ridging fertilization under a mechanical direct seeding system improves the grain yield and lodging resistance of early indica rice in South China. Field Crops Research, 2021, 270: 108184. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108184. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108184.
[13]	高明. 稻田长期垄作免耕下土壤肥力及环境效应的研究[D]. 重庆: 西南农业大学, 2001.
	GAO M. Research on soil fertility and environmental effects under long-term ridge and no-tillage rice field[D]. Chongqing: Southwest Agricultural University, 2001. (in Chinese)
[14]	WANG Z Q, GU D J, BEEBOUT S S, ZHANG H, LIU L J, YANG J C, ZHANG J H. Effect of irrigation regime on grain yield, water productivity, and methane emissions in dry direct-seeded rice grown in raised beds with wheat straw incorporation. The Crop Journal, 2018, 6(5): 495-508. doi:10.1016/j.cj.2018.05.004. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2018.05.004.
[15]	XU Y Y, WANG Y X, MA X C, LIU X, ZHANG P, CAI T, JIA Z K. Ridge-furrow mulching system and supplementary irrigation can reduce the greenhouse gas emission intensity. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 717: 137262. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137262. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137262.
[16]	SETYANTO P, PRAMONO A, ADRIANY T A, SUSILAWATI H L, TOKIDA T, PADRE A T, MINAMIKAWA K. Alternate wetting and drying reduces methane emission from a rice paddy in Central Java, Indonesia without yield loss. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2018, 64(1): 23-30. doi:10.1080/00380768.2017.1409600. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2017.1409600.
[17]	MANEEPITAK S, ULLAH H, DATTA A, SHRESTHA R P, SHRESTHA S, KACHENCHART B. Effects of water and rice straw management practices on water savings and greenhouse gas emissions from a double-rice paddy field in the Central Plain of Thailand. European Journal of Agronomy, 2019, 107: 18-29. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2019.04.002. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2019.04.002.
[18]	OO A Z, SUDO S, INUBUSHI K, MANO M, YAMAMOTO A, ONO K, OSAWA T, HAYASHIDA S, PATRA P K, TERAO Y, ELAYAKUMAR P, VANITHA K, UMAMAGESWARI C, JOTHIMANI P, RAVI V. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from conventional and modified rice cultivation systems in South India. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 252: 148-158. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.014. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.014.
[19]	PANDEY A, MAI V T, VU D Q, BUI T P L, MAI T L A, JENSEN L S, DE NEERGAARD A. Organic matter and water management strategies to reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in Vietnam. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2014, 196: 137-146. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.06.010. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.06.010.
[20]	HOU H J, YANG S H, WANG F T, LI D, XU J Z. Controlled irrigation mitigates the annual integrative global warming potential of methane and nitrous oxide from the rice-winter wheat rotation systems in Southeast China. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 86: 239-246. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.022. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.022.
[21]	YANG S H, PENG S Z, XU J Z, LUO Y F, LI D X. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from paddy field as affected by water-saving irrigation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2012, 53/54: 30-37. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2011.08.020. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2011.08.020.
[22]	HOU H J, PENG S Z, XU J Z, YANG S H, MAO Z. Seasonal variations of CH₄ and N₂O emissions in response to water management of paddy fields located in Southeast China. Chemosphere, 2012, 89(7): 884-892. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.066. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.066.
[23]	CARRIJO D R, LUNDY M E, LINQUIST B A. Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: a meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 2017, 203: 173-180. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.002. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.002.
[24]	BROOKS S A, ANDERS M M, YEATER K M. Effect of furrow irrigation on the severity of false smut in susceptible rice varieties. Plant Disease, 2010, 94(5): 570-574. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-5-0570. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-94-5-0570 pmid: 30754472
[25]	FENG Z Y, QIN T, DU X Z, SHENG F, LI C F. Effects of irrigation regime and rice variety on greenhouse gas emissions and grain yields from paddy fields in central China. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 250: 106830. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106830. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106830.
[26]	LAGOMARSINO A, AGNELLI A E, LINQUIST B, ADVIENTO- BORBE M A, AGNELLI A, GAVINA G, RAVAGLIA S, FERRARA R M. Alternate wetting and drying of rice reduced CH₄ emissions but triggered N₂O peaks in a clayey soil of central Italy. Pedosphere, 2016, 26(4): 533-548. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60063-7. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60063-7.
[27]	LIANG K M, ZHONG X H, HUANG N R, LAMPAYAN R M, PAN J F, TIAN K, LIU Y Z. Grain yield, water productivity and CH₄ emission of irrigated rice in response to water management in South China. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 163: 319-331. doi:10. 1016/j.agwat.2015.10.015. doi: 10. 1016/j.agwat.2015.10.015.
[28]	XU Y, ZHAN M, CAO C G, TIAN S Y, GE J Z, LI S Y, WANG M Y, YUAN G Y. Improved water management to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in no-till rapeseed-rice rotations in Central China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, 221: 87-98. doi:10. 1016/j.agee.2016.01.021. doi: 10. 1016/j.agee.2016.01.021.
[29]	申丽娟. 侯光炯学术思想:历史、哲学与表达[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2014.
	SHEN L J. Research on history, philosophy and expression of Hou Kuangchun's academic thought[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[30]	岳以翛. 西南地区山地农业机械化的发展现状及对策研究: 以重庆地区为例[D]. 重庆: 重庆三峡学院, 2018.
	YUE Y X. Research on the development status and countermeasures of mountain agricultural mechanization in Southwest China. Chongqing: Chongqing Three Gorges University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[31]	许轲, 唐磊, 张洪程, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 韦还和. 不同机械直播方式对水稻分蘖特性及产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(13): 43-52. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.13.006. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.13.006.
	XU K, TANG L, ZHANG H C, GUO B W, HUO Z Y, DAI Q G, WEI H Y, WEI H H. Effect of different mechanical direct seeding methods on tiller characteristics and yield of rice. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(13): 43-52. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.13.006. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.13.006.
[32]	张岳芳, 陈留根, 张传胜, 杨洪建, 盛婧, 朱普平, 郑建初. 水稻机械化播栽对稻田甲烷和氧化亚氮排放的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(14): 232-241. doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.14.032. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.14.032.
	ZHANG Y F, CHEN L G, ZHANG C S, YANG H J, SHENG J, ZHU P P, ZHENG J C. Influence of rice mechanical planting methods on methane and nitrous oxide emissions from paddy field. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(14): 232-241. doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.14.032. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.14.032.
[33]	LI H, GUO H Q, HELBIG M, DAI S Q, ZHANG M S, ZHAO M, PENG C H, XIAO X M, ZHAO B. Does direct-seeded rice decrease ecosystem-scale methane emissions? —A case study from a rice paddy in southeast China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 272/273: 118-127. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.04.005. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.04.005.
[34]	刘杰, 罗尊长, 肖小平, 余崇祥, 洪曦, 孙耿, 唐海明. 不同栽培和灌溉方式对冷浸稻田还原性物质及水稻生长的影响. 作物研究, 2014, 28(5): 451-454. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5280.2014.05.01. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5280.2014.05.01.
	LIU J, LUO Z C, XIAO X P, YU C X, HONG X, SUN G, TANG H M. Effects of different tillage and irrigation modes on reducing substances and rice growth of cold spring paddy soil. Crop Research, 2014, 28(5): 451-454. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5280.2014.05.01. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5280.2014.05.01.
[35]	秦川. 稻田垄作免耕提高土壤氮素肥力的作用机制研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2021.
	QIN C. Study on the mechanism of improving soil nitrogen fertility by combination ridge with no-tillage in paddy field[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[36]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. 3rd ed. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[37]	张自常, 李鸿伟, 陈婷婷, 王学明, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 畦沟灌溉和干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量与品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(24): 4988-4998. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.24.003. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.24.003.
	ZHANG Z C, LI H W, CHEN T T, WANG X M, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Effect of furrow irrigation and alternate wetting and drying irrigation on grain yield and quality of rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(24): 4988-4998. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.24.003. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.24.003.
[38]	王永明, 徐永记, 纪洋, 冯彦房. 节水灌溉和控释肥施用耦合措施对单季稻田CH₄和N₂O排放的影响. 环境科学, 2021, 42(12): 6025-6037. doi:10.13227/j.hjkx.202103275. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202103275.
	WANG Y M, XU Y J, JI Y, FENG Y F. Coupling effects of water-saving irrigation and controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) application on CH₄ and N₂O emission in single cropping paddy field. Environmental Science, 2021, 42(12): 6025-6037. doi:10.13227/j.hjkx.202103275. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13227/j. hjkx.
[39]	黄容, 高明, 黎嘉成, 徐国鑫, 王富华, 李娇, 陈仕奇. 有机物料等氮量施用对紫色土氮形态及温室气体排放的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(21): 4087-4101. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.21.008. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.21.008.
	HUANG R, GAO M, LI J C, XU G X, WANG F H, LI J, CHEN S Q. Effects of combined application of various organic materials and chemical fertilizer on soil nitrogen formation and greenhouse gas emission under equal nitrogen rates from purple soil. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(21): 4087-4101. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.21.008. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.21.008.
[40]	王蕾, 董彦宏, 王连峰. 不同水分含量下黑土氧化亚氮排放差异. 大连交通大学学报, 2021, 42(5): 84-88. doi:10.13291/j.cnki.djdxac.2021.05.016. doi: 10.13291/j.cnki.djdxac.2021.05.016.
	WANG L, DONG Y H, WANG L F. Difference of nitrous oxide emission in black soil under different water content. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 2021, 42(5): 84-88. doi:10.13291/j.cnki.djdxac.2021.05.016. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13291/j.cnki.djdxac.2021.05.016.
[41]	向伟, 王雷, 刘天奇, 李诗豪, 翟中兵, 李成芳. 生物炭与无机氮配施对稻田温室气体排放及氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(22): 4634-4645. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.22.010. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.22.010.
	XIANG W, WANG L, LIU T Q, LI S H, ZHAI Z B, LI C F. Effects of biochar plus inorganic nitrogen on the greenhouse gas and nitrogen use efficiency from rice fields. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(22): 4634-4645. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.22.010. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.22.010.
[42]	李健陵, 李玉娥, 周守华, 苏荣瑞, 万运帆, 王斌, 蔡威威, 郭晨, 秦晓波. 节水灌溉、树脂包膜尿素和脲酶/硝化抑制剂对双季稻温室气体减排的协同作用. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(20): 3958-3967. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.010. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.010.
	LI J L, LI Y E, ZHOU S H, SU R R, WAN Y F, WANG B, CAI W W, GUO C, QIN X B. Synergistic effects of water-saving irrigation, polymer-coated nitrogen fertilizer and urease/nitrification inhibitor on mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from the double rice cropping system. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(20): 3958-3967. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.010. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.010.
[43]	ISLAM S M M, GAIHRE Y K, ISLAM M R, AKTER M, AL MAHMUD A, SINGH U, SANDER B O. Effects of water management on greenhouse gas emissions from farmers' rice fields in Bangladesh. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 734: 139382. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139382. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139382.
[44]	MEIJIDE A, GRUENING C, GODED I, SEUFERT G, CESCATTI A. Water management reduces greenhouse gas emissions in a Mediterranean rice paddy field. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2017, 238: 168-178. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.017. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.017.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

作物类型 Crop type	2019-2020		2020-2021		2021-2022
作物类型 Crop type	播种期 Sowing date	收获期 Harvest date	播种期 Sowing date	收获期 Harvest date	播种期 Sowing date	收获期 Harvest date
水稻 Rice	2019.05.14	2019.09.16	2020.05.09	2020.09.20	2021.05.06	2021.09.07
萝卜 Radish	2019.10.15	2020.02.02	2020.10.11	2021.01.22	/	/

温室气体Greenhouse gas	因素Factor	df	F	P
CH₄	控制灌溉Control irrigation	4	547.71	<0.01
	年份 Year	2	2.66	>0.05
	控制灌溉×年份Control irrigation×Year	8	35.11	<0.01
N₂O	控制灌溉 Control irrigation	4	195.40	<0.01
	年份 Year	2	36.26	<0.01
	控制灌溉×年份Control irrigation×Year	8	15.47	<0.01

灌水处理 Irrigation treatment	硝态氮 NO₃^--N (mg·kg^-1)	铵态氮 NH₄⁺-N (mg·kg^-1)	还原物质总量 Total reducing substance (cmol·kg^-1)	活性还原物质 Active reducing substance (cmol·kg^-1)	还原性铁 Reducing Fe (cmol·kg^-1)	还原性锰 Reducing Mn (cmol·kg^-1)
TFI	50.01±3.88b	19.45±0.31a	10.41±1.39a	2.75±0.42a	0.86±0.28a	0.42±0.08a
CFI1	55.31±2.55ab	17.82±1.12b	8.85±0.24b	2.67±0.32a	0.84±0.29a	0.38±0.08a
CFI2	60.47±3.02a	17.53±1.05b	9.14±0.58ab	1.28±0.29b	0.62±0.14a	0.34±0.05a
CFI3	62.37±1.31a	17.99±1.09b	7.20±1.02b	0.78±0.32b	0.34±0.02b	0.31±0.06a

年份 Year	灌水处理 Irrigation treatment	CH₄ (kg·hm^-2)	N₂O (kg·hm^-2)	全球增温潜势 GWP (kg CO₂eq·hm^-2)
2019	TFI	404.73±20.21a	2.27±0.07b	10794.71±601.11a
	CFI1	245.80±9.10b	2.07±0.10b	6791.66±257.30b
	CFI2	188.83±5.12c	3.25±0.13a	5689.34±168.99c
	CFI3	179.27±5.68c	1.33±0.06c	4878.09±159.88d
2020	TFI	430.57±25.24a	2.07±0.07b	11381.11±651.86a
	CFI1	312.73±10.64b	2.09±0.06b	8441.07±283.88b
	CFI2	165.85±2.38c	3.31±0.08a	5132.63±83.34c
	CFI3	92.72±2.28d	1.82±0.05c	2860.36±71.90d
2021	TFI	280.81±9.16a	2.64±0.15b	7806.97±273.70a
	CFI1	216.77±11.46b	2.71±0.14b	6226.83±328.22b
	CFI2	159.73±3.62c	3.18±0.12a	4940.89±126.26c
	CFI3	151.00±4.29c	1.62±0.12c	4257.76±143.01d

Effects of Control Irrigation on Grain Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Ridge Cultivation Direct-Seeding Paddy Field

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 44

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2^# and Changbai7^# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2]	CUI JieHao, ZHANG Meng, WANG Qin, YU JiaYan, LIN Kun, LI ShangZe, LAN Heng, GENG YanQiu, ZHANG Qiang, GUO LiYing, SHAO XiWen. Evaluation of Lodging Resistance and Its Physiological Mechanisms in Japonica Rice Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1420-1438.
[3]	YUAN HaoLiang, NIE Jun, LI Peng, LU YanHong, LIAO YuLin, XU ChangXu, LI ZhongYi, CAO WeiDong, ZHANG JiangLin. Effects of Co-Utilization of Chinese Milk Vetch and Rice Straw on Soil Phosphorus Composition and Phosphorus Activation of Paddy Field in Southern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1480-1491.
[4]	XU YangHaoJun, CHEN LiMing, YANG ShiQi, TANG YiFan, TAN XueMing, ZENG YongJun, PAN XiaoHua, ZENG YanHua. Effects of Long-Term Different Straw Returning Methods on Soil Organic Carbon, Nutrients and Aggregate Formation in Different Soil Layers of Double Cropping Rice Field [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1492-1506.
[5]	ZHU Qi, JIA ZhenPeng, Tahir SHAH, XU ChenSheng, LI ZhiQi, LÜ HuiShuai, ZHU PengChao, WEI XiaoMin, HUANG DongLin, SUN YanNi, CAO WeiDong, GAO YaJun, WANG ZhaoHui, ZHANG DaBin. Green Manure Crops Combined with Enhanced-Efficiency Products Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Footprints in Dryland Wheat Fields [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1507-1522.
[6]	LI XingYu, HUANG Rong, XIAN YiMing, TIAN JiaoJiao, MA XiaoJin, YANG QiaoXi, LI Bing, WANG ChangQuan. Characteristics of Organic Carbon Fractions and Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Different Size Aggregates in Rice Field Soils in Response to Long-Term Fertilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1255-1271.
[7]	MA ZhaoHui, QUAN ChengZhe, CHENG HaiTao, YANG KanJie, LI XinRui, LÜ WenYan. The Breeding Goals and Strategies of Northeast Japonica Rice Under the Background of Zhongke Fa No.5 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 927-936.
[8]	ZHANG WeiJian, YAN ShengJi, SHANG ZiYin, TANG ZhiWei, WU LiuGe, LI JiaRui, CHEN HaoTian, DENG AiXing, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Xin, ZHENG ChengYan, SONG ZhenWei. Methane Emissions from Paddy Fields: Not Entirely Attributable to Rice Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 824-833.
[9]	CHEN Min, JIAO ZiLan, QIAO ChengBin, XU Hao, ZHANG Bi, MA DongHua, KONG WeiRu, WANG JingWen, SONG JiaWei, LUO ChengKe, LI PeiFu, TIAN Lei. Morpho-Physiological Responses and Adaptive Strategies of Rice Germplasm Accessions from Different Subspecies Under Salt Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 705-722.
[10]	GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[11]	LUO Wei, YU Hong, YUAN LiXin, WANG LingLing, ZHAO JinPeng, YIN Wei, WANG MingTian, WANG RuLin. Change of Geographic Distributions of Ratoon Rice in Sichuan- Chongqing Under Global Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 765-780.
[12]	ZHU Shu, GUO ZhiPeng, SUN Ying. Functional Analysis of Rice Target of Rapamycin OsTOR in Regulating Root Elongation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 475-485.
[13]	LÜ WenYan, CHENG HaiTao, MA ZhaoHui, TIAN ShuHua. Discussion on Hybridization Breeding Technology and Strategy of Rice in the New Era of Breeding [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 233-238.
[14]	LIAO TingLu, SHI YaFei, XIAO DongHao, SHE YangMengFei, GUO FuCheng, YANG JiuJu, TANG HaiJiang, LUO ChengKe. The Effect of Exogenous Nitroprusside on Sugar Metabolism in Rice Seedlings Under Alkaline Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 265-277.
[15]	LIU TianSheng, LIU GengYuan, ZHAO AnQi, YANG Xu, CAI MingXue, YANG AiWen, LOU MingXuan, LI MuKai, WANG Han, ZHANG YaLing. Pathogenic Population of Rice Bakanae Disease in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 305-321.