Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2013, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (13): 2739-2750.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.13.012

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Genetic Diversity of Tree Peony Cultivar Resources in Heze Revealed by CDDP Marker

 LI  Ying-Ying, ZHENG  Cheng-Shu   

  1. 1.College of Horticultural Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Huanghuai Region), Ministry of Agriculture, Tai’an 271018, Shandong
    2.Department of Garden Engineering, Heze University, Heze 274015, Shandong
    3.Shandong Chrysanthemum Technology Center of China, Japan, Korea, Tai’an 271018, Shandong
  • Received:2013-02-01 Online:2013-07-01 Published:2013-03-28

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study was to evaluate the genetic diversity and differentiation of Heze tree peony resources at cultivar group level and flower-color population level, respectively.【Method】DNA samples of 299 tree peony cultivars composed of 10 different flower-color populations were amplified by CDDP primers. The 10 populations respectively consisted of white, pink, black, red, yellow, blue, green, fuchsia, purple and complex color cultivars.【Result】With 18 informative and reliable primers, 368 polymorphic loci were detected out of 385 bands in total. At cultivar group level, the Nei’s gene diversity (H), Shannon’s information index (I) and effective number of alleles were 0.1648, 1.2569 and 0.2695, respectively. At population level, the above index was 0.1451, 1.2313 and 0.2306 in turn. Comprehensive analysis indicated that the red population or purple population had higher genetic diversity, while the genetic diversity of the complex-color population or green population was lower. The genetic distance among 10 populations was closer, with an average of 0.0271. The genetic identity was higher, with an average of 0.9735. The coefficient of gene differentiation (Gst) among them was 0.1252, showing that 12.52% genetic variation existed among populations. Gene flow from Gst was 3.4939. Results obtained from genetic diversity analysis and UPGMA dendrogram based Nei’s genetic identity proved the evolutionary trend of tree peony’s flower color at molecular level: pink and red systems might be at the center of Heze tree peony resources, then gradually evolved into fuchsia, purple, blue, white, yellow or black cultivars, while green or complex color cultivars belonged to the degraded color system.【Conclusion】CDDP marker technique can effectively reveal the genetic diversity of tree peony germplasm resources. At cultivar group level, the diversity of Heze tree peony resources was higher than that at flower-color population level. There existed a certain degree of genetic differentiation among the 10 populations. And the clustering results revealed the evolutionary trend of tree peony color.

Key words: tree peony , flower color , CDDP , genetic diversity , genetic differentiation

[1]李嘉珏, 张西方, 赵孝庆. 中国牡丹. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 2011.

Li J J, Zhang X F, Zhao X Q. Tree Peony of China. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 2011. (in Chinese)

[2]Cheng F Y. Advances in the breeding of tree peonies and a cultivar system for the cultivar group. International Journal of Plant Breeding, 2007, 1: 89-104.

[3]裴颜龙, 邹喻苹, 尹蓁, 汪小全, 张志宪, 洪德元. 矮牡丹与紫斑牡丹RAPD分析初报. 植物分类学报, 1995, 33(4): 350-356.

Pei Y L, Zou Y P, Yin Z, Wang X Q, Zhang Z X, Hong D Y. Preliminary report of RAPD analysis in Paeonia suffruticosa subsp. Spontanea and Paeonia rockii. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 1995, 33(4): 350-356. (in Chinese)

[4]邹喻苹, 蔡美琳, 王子平. 芍药属牡丹组的系统学研究: 基于RAPD 分析. 植物分类学报, 1999, 37(3): 220-227.

Zou Y P, Cai M L, Wang Z P. Systematic studies on Paeonia sect. Moutan DC. based on RAPD analysis. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 1999, 37(3): 220-227. (in Chinese)

[5]Tank D C, Sang T. Phylogenetic utility of the glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gene: evolution and implications in Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2001, 19(3): 421-429.

[6]林启冰, 周志钦, 赵宣, 潘开玉, 洪德元. 基于Adh 基因家族序列的牡丹组(Sect. Moutan DC.) 种间关系. 园艺学报, 2004, 31(5): 627-632.

Lin Q B, Zhou Z Q, Zhao X, Pan K Y, Hong D Y. Interspecific relationships among the wild species of Paeonia Sect. Moutan DC. based on DNA sequences of Adh gene family. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2004, 31(5): 627-632. (in Chinese)

[7]赵宣, 周志钦, 林启冰, 潘开玉, 洪德元. 芍药属牡丹组(Paeonia sect. Moutan) 种间关系的分子证据: GPAT 基因的PCR-RFLP 和序列分析. 植物分类学报, 2004, 42(3): 236-244.

Zhao X, Zhou Z Q, Lin Q B, Pan K Y, Hong D Y. Molecular evidence for the interspecific relationships in Paeonia sect. Moutan: PCR-RFLP and sequence analysis of glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) gene. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 2004, 42(3): 236-244. (in Chinese)

[8]Zhao X, Zhou Z Q, Lin Q B, Pan K Y, Li M Y. Phylogenetic analysis of Paeonia sect. Moutan (Paeoniaceae) based on multiple DNA fragments and morphological data. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2008, 46(4): 563-572.

[9]Zhang J M, Wang J X, Xia T, Zhou S L. DNA barcoding: species delimitation in tree peonies. Science in China Series C: Life Sciences, 2009, 52(6): 568-578.

[10]Yuan J H, Cheng F Y, Zhou S L. Hybrid origin of Paeonia× yananensis revealed by microsatellite markers, morphoplast gene sequences and morphological characteristics. International Journal of Plant Science, 2010, 171(4): 409-420.

[11]Zhang J M, Liu J, Sun H L, Yu J, Wang J X, Zhou S L. Nuclear and chloroplast SSR markers in Paeonia delavayi (Paeoniaceae) and cross-species amplification in P. ludlowii. American Journal of Botany, 2011, 98(12): e346-e348.

[12]Yuan J H, Cheng F Y, Zhou S L. The phylogeographic structure and conservation genetics of the endangered tree peony, Paeonia rockii (Paeoniaceae), inferred from chloroplast gene sequences. Conservation Genetics, 2011, 12: 1539-1549.

[13]杨淑达, 施苏华, 龚洵, 周仁超. 滇牡丹遗传多样性的ISSR分析. 生物多样性, 2005, 13(2): 105-111.

Yang S D, Shi S H, Gong X, Zhou R C. Genetic diversity of Paeonia delavayias revealed by ISSRs. Biodiversity Science, 2005, 13(2): 105-111. (in Chinese)

[14]Yuan J H, Cheng F Y, Zhou S L. Genetic structure of the tree peony (Paeonia rockii) and the Qinling Mountains as a geographic barrier driving the fragmentation of a large population. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(4): e34955

[15]孟丽, 郑国生. 部分野生与栽培牡丹种质资源亲缘关系的RAPD 研究. 林业科学, 2004, 40(5): 110-115.

Meng L, Zheng G S. Phylogenetic relationship analysis among Chinese wild species and cultivar of Paeonia sect. Moutan using RAPD markers. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2004, 40(5): 110-115. (in Chinese)

[16]索志立, 周世良, 张会金, 张治明. 杨山牡丹和牡丹种间杂交后代的DNA 分子证据. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17(6): 700-705.

Suo Z L, Zhou S L, Zhang H J, Zhang Z M. DNA molecular evidences of the inter-specific hybrids between Paeonia ostii and P. suffruticosa based on ISSR markers. Forest Research, 2004, 17(6): 700-705. (in Chinese)

[17]索志立, 张会金, 张治明, 陈富飞, 陈富慧. 紫斑牡丹与牡丹种间杂交后代的DNA 分子证据. 云南植物研究, 2005, 27(1): 42-48.

Suo Z L, Zhang H J, Zhang Z M, Chen F F, Chen F H. DNA molecular evidences of the inter-specific hybrids between Paeonia rockii and P. suffruticosa based on ISSR markers. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 2005, 27(1): 42-48. (in Chinese)

[18]Han X Y, Wang L S, Shu Q Y, Liu Z A, Xu S X, Tetsumura T. Molecular characterization of tree peony germplasm using sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers. Biochemical Genetics, 2008, 46: 162-179.

[19]Han X Y, Wang L S, Liu Z A, Jan D R, Shu Q Y. Characterization of sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers analysis of tree peony bud sports. Scientia Horticulturae, 2008, 115: 261-267.

[20]Shu Q Y, Wang L S, Wu J, Du H, Liu Z A, Ren H X, Zhang J J. Analysis of the formation of flower shapes in wild species and cultivars of tree peony using the MADS-box subfamily gene. Gene, 2012, 493: 113-123.

[21]Ji L J, Wang Q, Teixeira da Silva J A, Yu X N. The genetic diversity of Paeonia L. Scientia Horticulturae, 2012, 143: 62-74.

[22]于晓南, 季丽静, 王琪. 芍药属植物分子水平遗传多样性研究进展. 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(3): 130-136.

Yu X N, Ji L J, Wang Q. Research advances in molecular genetic diversity of Paeonia L.. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(3): 130-136. (in Chinese)

[23]Hosoki T, Kimura D, Hasegawa R, Nagasako T, Nishimoto K, Ohta K, Sugiyama M, Haruki K. Comparative study of Chinese tree peony cultivars by random amplified polymorphic DNA ( RAPD) analysis. Scientia Horticulturae, 1997, 70: 67-72.

[24]陈向明, 郑国生, 孟丽. 不同花色牡丹品种亲缘关系的RAPD-PCR分析. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(5) : 546-551.

Chen X M, Zheng G S, Meng L. RAPD-PCR analysis of genetic diversity of different colour 35 tree Paeonia cultivars. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(5): 546-551. (in Chinese)

[25]Guo D L, Hou X G, Zhang J. Sequence-related amplified polymorphism analysis of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews) cultivars with different flower colors. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 2009, 84: 131-136.

[26]王娟, 郭大龙, 侯小改, 范丙友, 刘改秀, 李友军. 不同花型牡丹品种亲缘关系的SRAP分析. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(28): 167-171.

Wang J, Guo D L, Hou X G, Fan B Y, Liu G X, Li Y J. SRAP analysis of genetic relationships of the different tree peony flower forms. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(28): 167-171. (in Chinese)

[27]侯小改, 尹伟伦, 李嘉珏, 王华芳. 部分牡丹品种遗传多样性的AFLP分析. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(8): 1709-1715.

Hou X G, Yin W L, Li J J, Wang H F. AFLP analysis of       genetic diversity of 30 tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.) cultivars. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(8): 1709-1715. (in Chinese)

[28]苏雪, 张辉, 董莉娜, 张建清, 朱学泰, 孙坤. 应用RAPD技术对甘肃栽培牡丹品种的分类鉴定研究. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(4): 696-701.

Su X, Zhang H, Dong L N, Zhang J Q, Zhu X T, Sun K. RAPD classification and identification of Paeonia rockii varieties planted in Gansu province. Acta Botanica Boreali-OccidentaliaSinica, 2006, 26(4): 696-701. (in Chinese)

[29]杨美玲, 唐红. 紫斑牡丹遗传多样性的ISSR分析. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(4): 693-696.

Yang M L, Tang H. Genetic diversity of Paeonia rockii revealed by ISSRs. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2012, 32(4): 693-696. (in Chinese)

[30]Suo Z L, Li W Y, Yao J, Zhang H J, Zhang Z M, Zhao D X. Applicability of leaf morphology and intersimple sequence repeat markers in classification of tree peony (Peoniaceae) cultivars. HortScience, 2005, 40(2): 329-334.

[31]Hou X G, Guo D L, Wang J. Development and characterization of EST-SSR markers in Paeonia suffruticosa(Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany, 2011, 98(11): e303-e305.

[32]Zhang J J, Shu Q Y, Liu Z A, Ren H X, Wang L S, Keyser E D. Two EST-derived marker systems for cultivar identification in tree peony. Plant Cell Reports, 2012, 31: 299-310.

[33]Suo Z L, Zhang C H, Zheng Y Q, He L X, Jin X B, Hou B X, Li J J. Revealing genetic diversity of tree peonies at micro-evolution level with hyper-variable chloroplast markers and floral traits. Plant Cell Reports, 2012, 31: 2199-2213.

[34]Collard B C Y, Mackill D J. Conserved DNA-derived polymorphism (CDDP): a simple and novel method for generating DNA markers in plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2009, 27: 558-562.

[35]熊发前, 蒋菁, 钟瑞春, 韩柱强, 贺梁琼, 李忠, 庄伟建, 唐荣华. 两种新型目标分子标记技术—CDDP与PAAP. 植物生理学通讯, 2010, 46(9): 871-875.

Xiong F Q, Jiang J, Zhong R C, Han Z Q, He L Q, Li Z, Zhuang W J, Tang R H. Two novel targeted molecular marker techniques - CDDP and PAAP. Plant Physiology Communications, 2010, 46(9): 871-875. (in Chinese)

[36]熊发前, 蒋菁, 钟瑞春, 韩柱强, 贺梁琼, 李忠, 庄伟建, 唐荣华. 分子标记技术的两种新分类思路及目标分子标记技术的提出. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(10): 60-64.

Xiong F Q, Jiang J, Zhong R C, Han Z Q, He L Q, Li Z, Zhuang    W J, Tang R H. Two novel classifications on molecular marker techniques and proposal of targeted molecular marker technique. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(10): 60-64. (in Chinese)

[37]Poczai P, Varga I, Bell N E, Hyvönen J. Genetic diversity assessment of bittersweet (Solanum dulcamara, Solanaceae) germplasm using conserved DNA-derived polymorphism and intron-targeting markers. Annals of Applied Biology, 2011, 159: 141-153.

[38]Poczai P, Varga I, Laos M, Cseh A, Bell N, Valkonen J P T, Hyvönen J. Advances in plant gene-targeted and functional markers: a review. Plant Methods, 2013, 9: 6.

[39]杨景华, 王士伟, 刘训言, 杨加付, 张明方. 高等植物功能性分子标记的开发与利用. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(11): 3429 -3436.

Yang J H, Wang S W, Liu X Y, Yang J F, Zhang M F. Development and application of functional markers in higher plants. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(11): 3429-3436. (in Chinese)

[40]关媛, 鄂文弟, 王丽侠, 关荣霞, 刘章雄, 常汝镇, 曲延英, 邱丽 娟. 以湖南和湖北大豆为例分析影响遗传多样性评价的因素. 作物学报, 2007, 33(3) : 461-468.

Guan Y, E W D, Wang L X, Guan R X, Liu Z X, Chang R Z, Qu Y Y, Qiu L J. Analysis of factors influencing the genetic diversity evaluation using two soybean collections from Hunan and Hubei. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(3): 461-468. (in Chinese)

[41]张晶晶, 王亮生, 刘政安, 李崇晖. 牡丹花色研究进展. 园艺学报, 2006, 33(6): 1383-1388.

Zhang J J, Wang L S, Liu Z A, Li C H. Recent advances in flower color research of tree peony. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2006, 33(6): 1383-1388. (in Chinese)

[42]Wang L S, Hashimoto F, Shiraishi A, Shimizu K, Aoki N, Li J J, Sakata Y. Phenetics in tree peony species from China by flower pigment cluster analysis. Journal of Plant Research, 2001, 114: 213-221.

[43]Wang L S, Shiraishi A, Hashimoto F, Aoki N, Shimizu K, Sakata Y. Analysis of petal anthocyanins to investigate flower coloration of Zhongyuan (Chinese) and Daikon Island (Japanese) tree peony cultivars. Journal of Plant Research, 2001, 114: 33-43.

[44]Wang L S, Hashimoto F, Shiraishi A, Aoki N, Li J J, Sakata Y. Chemical taxonomy of the Xibei tree peony from China by floral pigmentation. Journal of Plant Research, 2004, 117: 47-55.

[45]袁涛 王莲英. 我国芍药属牡丹组革质花盘亚组的形态学研究. 园艺学报, 2003, 30(2): 187-191.

Yuan T, Wang L Y. Morphological studies on Paeonia Sect. Moutan subsect Vagiatae in China. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2003, 30(2): 187-191. (in Chinese)

[46]张艳丽, 李正红, 马宏, 王雁, 李文娟, 刘秀贤, 万友名. 滇牡丹花色类群性状变异分析. 植物分类与资源学报, 2011, 33(2): 183-190.

Zhang Y L, Li Z H, Ma H, Wang Y, Li W J, Liu X X, Wan Y M. A study on characters variation of different flower color groups of Paeonia delavayi (Paeoniaceae). Plant Diversity and Resources, 2011, 33(2): 183-190. (in Chinese)

[47]史倩倩, 王雁, 周琳, 黄国伟. 十大花色中原牡丹传统品种核型分化程度. 林业科学研究, 2012, 25(4): 470-476.

Shi Q Q, Wang Y, Zhou L, Huang G W. Karyotypes and chromosomal differentiation in cultivars of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). Forest Research, 2012, 25(4): 470-476. (in Chinese)
[1] JIANG Peng, ZHANG Peng, YAO JinBao, WU Lei, HE Yi, LI Chang, MA HongXiang, ZHANG Xu. Phenotypic Characteristics and Related Gene Analysis of Ningmai Series Wheat Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 233-247.
[2] XiaoChuan LI,ChaoHai WANG,Ping ZHOU,Wei MA,Rui WU,ZhiHao SONG,Yan MEI. Deciphering of the Genetic Diversity After Field Late Blight Resistance Evaluation of Potato Breeds [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3484-3500.
[3] YingLing WAN,MengTing ZHU,AiQing LIU,YiJia JIN,Yan LIU. Phenotypic Diversity Analysis of Chinese Ornamental Herbaceous Peonies and Its Germplasm Resource Evaluation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3629-3639.
[4] HU GuangMing,ZHANG Qiong,HAN Fei,LI DaWei,LI ZuoZhou,WANG Zhi,ZHAO TingTing,TIAN Hua,LIU XiaoLi,ZHONG CaiHong. Screening and Application of Universal SSR Molecular Marker Primers in Actinidia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3411-3425.
[5] CHEN Xu,HAO YaQiong,NIE XingHua,YANG HaiYing,LIU Song,WANG XueFeng,CAO QingQin,QIN Ling,XING Yu. Association Analysis of Main Characteristics of Bur and Nut with SSR Markers in Chinese Chestnut [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2613-2628.
[6] XU Xiao,REN GenZeng,ZHAO XinRui,CHANG JinHua,CUI JiangHui. Accurate Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation of Panicle Phenotypic Traits of Landraces and Cultivars of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
[7] NIE XingHua, ZHENG RuiJie, ZHAO YongLian, CAO QingQin, QIN Ling, XING Yu. Genetic Diversity Evaluation of Castanea in China Based on Fluorescently Labeled SSR [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1739-1750.
[8] TANG XiuJun,FAN YanFeng,JIA XiaoXu,GE QingLian,LU JunXian,TANG MengJun,HAN Wei,GAO YuShi. Genetic Diversity and Origin Characteristics of Chicken Species Based on Mitochondrial DNA D-loop Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5302-5315.
[9] YE Di,SHI Jiang,GAO ShuangCheng,WANG ZhanYing,SHI GuoAn. Correlation Analysis of Auxin Involved in the Process of Petal Abscission of Tree Peony Luoyanghong Cut Flowers by Ethylene Promoting [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 5097-5109.
[10] LI XinYuan, LOU JinXiu, LIU QingYuan, HU Jian, ZHANG YingJun. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Rhizobia Associated with Medicago sativa Cultivated in Northeast and North China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(16): 3393-3405.
[11] WANG FuQiang,ZHANG Jian,WEN ChangLong,FAN XiuCai,ZHANG Ying,SUN Lei,LIU ChongHuai,JIANG JianFu. Identification of Grape Cultivars Based on KASP Markers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2830-2842.
[12] CUI HuLiang,HE Xia,ZHANG Qian. Anthocyanins and Flavonoids Accumulation Forms of Five Different Color Tree Peony Cultivars at Blooming Stages [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2858-2869.
[13] YANG Tao,HUANG YaJie,LI ShengMei,REN Dan,CUI JinXin,PANG Bo,YU Shuang,GAO WenWei. Genetic Diversity and Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Traits in Sea-Island Cotton Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12): 2499-2509.
[14] CUI YiPing,PENG AiTian,SONG XiaoBing,CHENG BaoPing,LING JinFeng,CHEN Xia. Investigation on Occurrence of Citrus Huanglongbing and Virus Diseases, and Prophage Genetic Diversity of Huanglongbing Pathogen in Meizhou, Guangdong [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1572-1582.
[15] JiaYing CHANG,ShuSen LIU,Jie SHI,Ning GUO,HaiJian ZHANG,HongXia MA,ChunFeng YANG. Pathogenicity and Genetic Diversity of Bipolaria maydis in Sanya, Hainan and Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(6): 1154-1165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!