Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2013, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 995-1004.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.05.015

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Waterlogging on Characteristics of Growth and Photosynthesis in Different Grape Rootstocks

 LI  Yan, FU  Yan-Dong, MA  Yan-Chun, DU  Yuan-Peng, DI  Heng   

  1. College of Horticultural Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, Shandong
  • Received:2012-12-11 Online:2013-03-01 Published:2012-12-24

PDF

983

Cited

12

Abstract: 【Objective】The purpose of this study was to elucidate the physiological responses of grape rootstocks to waterlogging stress and compare their tolerances to waterlogging stress.【Method】Seven grape rootstocks varieties were treated with pot waterlogging to study the effects of waterlogging stress on the growth, leaf photosynthetic characteristics and root physiological indexes. Based on the principle component analysis and cluster analysis, the waterlogging-tolerance of these varieties were comprehensively evaluated.【Result】The results showed that shoot growth, total dry matter, root vitality, total root length, total root surface area, chlorophyll content and net photosynthetic rate under waterlogging stress obviously declined compared with the control, shoot growth decreased by 14.01%-34.92% and dry weight decreased by 5.99%-30.79%. The impact on root was more serious than on leaf, showed that the root/shoot ratio decreased, SO4, 101-14M, 3309C and Beda were less influenced by waterlogging stress, while 1103P, 140Ru and 110R was more influenced; relative membrane permeability (RMP), proline (Pro) and ADH activities in roots were significantly increased.【Conclusion】SO4, 101-14M, 3309C and Beda showed higher tolerance to waterlogging stress, while 1103P, 140Ru and 110R were sensitive to waterlogging stress.

Key words: grape rootstock , waterlogging stress , physiological response , principle component analysis , cluster analysis

a[1]王萍, 胡永红, 王丽勉, 刘庆华. 观赏植物耐涝性鉴定指标的种类及其评价方法. 北方园艺, 2007(11): 78-81.

Wang P, Hu Y H, Wang L M, Liu Q H. Kinds of identification index and evaluation means of plant submergence endurance. Northern Horticulture, 2007 (11): 78-81.(in Chinese)

[2]Abiko T, Kotula L, Shiono K, Malik A I, Colmer T D, Nakazono M. Enhanced formation of aerenchyma and induction of a barrier to radial oxygen loss in adventitious roots of Zea nicaraguensis contribute to its waterlogging tolerance as compared with maize. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2012, 35(9): 1618-1630.

[3]Das K K, Panda D, Sarkar R K, Reddy J N, Ismail A M. Submergence tolerance in relation to variable floodwater conditions in rice. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2009, 66(3): 425-434.

[4]Malik A I, Colmer T D, Lambers H, Schortemeyer M. Changes in physiological and morphological traits of roots and shoots of wheat to different depths of waterlogging. Australia Journal of Plant Physiology, 2001, 28(11): 1121-1131.

[5]Asha S, Rao K N. Effect of waterlogging on the levels of abscisc acid in seed and leachates of peanut. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2001, 6(1): 87-89.

[6]Morard P, Lacoste L, Silvestre J. Effect of oxygen deficiency on uptake of water and mineral nutrients by tomato plants in soilless culture. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2000, 23(8): 1063-1078.

[7]Guo S R, Kazuyoshi N, Shoji T. A role for nitrate reductase in the high tolerance of cucumber seedlings to root-zone hypoxia. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 1998, 67(4): 613-618.

[8]Christianson J A, Liewellyn D J. Dennis E S. Wilson L W. Global gene expression responses to waterlogging in roots and leaves of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Physiology, 2010, 51(1): 21-37.

[9]Geigenberger P. Response of plant metabolism to too little oxygen. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2003, 6(3): 247-256.

[10]Kaelke C M，Dawson J O. Seasonal flooding regimes influence survival，nitrogen fixation and the partitioning of nitrogen and biomass in Alnus incana ssp．rugosa. Journal of Plant and Soil, 2003, 254(1): 167-177.

[11]乔海涛, 杨洪强, 申为宝, 姜倩倩, 由淑珍, 张龙, 冉坤, 张鑫荣. 缺氮和缺铁对平邑甜茶幼苗根系构型的影响. 园艺学报, 2009, 36(3): 321-326.

Qiao H T, Yang H Q, Shen W B, Jiang Q Q, You S Z, Zhang L, Ran K, Zhang X R. Effect of nitrogen-deficient and iron-deficient on root architecture of young seedlings of Malus hupehensis (Pamp) Rehd. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2009, 36(3): 321-326. (in Chinese)

[12]赵世杰, 史国安, 董新纯. 植物生理实验学指导. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2002.

Zhao S J, Shi G A, Dong X C. Techniques of Plant Physiological Experiment. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2002. (in Chinese)

[13]邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 62-63.

Zou Q. Guide of Plant Physiological Experiments. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 62-63. (in Chinese)

[14]高俊凤. 植物生理学试验技术. 西安: 世界图书出版社, 2000.

Gao J F. Techniques of Plant Physiological Experiment. Xi’an: World Publishing Company, 2000. (in Chinese)

[15]Waters I, Morrell S, Greenway H, Colmer T D. Effects of anoxia on wheat seedlingsⅡ. Influence of O2 supply prior to anoxia on tolerance to anoxia, alcoholic fermentation and sugar levels. Journal of Experiment Botany, 1991,42(11): 1437-1447.

[16]周广生, 梅方竹, 周竹青, 朱旭彤. 小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11): 1378-1382.

Zhou G S, Mei F Z, Zhou Z Q, Zhu X T. Comprehensive evaluation and forecast on physiological indices of waterlogging resistance of different wheat varieties. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003, 36(11): 1378-1382. (in Chinese)

[17]李鹏民, 高辉远, Reto J. Strasser. 快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学分析在光合作用研究中的应用. 植物生理与分子生物学报, 2005, 31(6): 559-556.

Li P M, Gao H Y, Strasser R J. Application of the fast chlorophyⅡ fluorescence induction dynamics analysis in photosynthesis study. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 2005, 31(6): 559-556. (in Chinese)

[18]阮成江, 谢庆良. 土壤水分对沙棘成活率及抗逆生理特性的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2002, 8(4): 341-345.

Ruan C J, Xie Q L. Effect of soil moisture on survival rate of Hippophae rhamnoides L. and its stress-resistance physiological characteristics. Chinese Journal of Applied Environmental Biology, 2002, 8(4): 341-345. (in Chinese)

[19]Sachs M M, Subbaiah C C, Saab I N . Anaerobic gene expression and flooding tolerance in maize. Journal of Experimental Botany,1996, 47: 1-15.

[20]胡晓辉, 郭世荣, 李璟, 王素平, 贾永霞. 低氧胁迫对黄瓜幼苗根系无氧呼吸酶和抗氧化酶活性的影响. 武汉植物学研究, 2005, 23(4): 337-341.

Hu X H, Guo S R, Li J, Wang S P, Jia Y X. Effects of hypoxia stress on anaerobic respiratory enzyme and antioxidant enzyme activities in roots of cucumber seedlings. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 2005, 23(4): 337-341. (in Chinese)

[21]Kozlowski T T. Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiology Monograph, 1997, 1: 1-29.

[22]Islam M A, Macdonald S E. Ecophysiological adaptations of black spruce (Picea mariana) and tamarack (Larix laricina) seedlings to flooding. Trees, 2004, 18:35-42.

[23]张晓平. 不同种源鹅掌楸和杂种鹅掌楸对淹水胁迫的响应[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2004.

Zhang X P. Response of waterlogging stress in different provenances of Liriodendron chinense and hybrid tulip-tree[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2004. (in Chinese)

[24]Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1982, 33: 317-345.

[25]张柔, 薛立, 郭淑红, 杨振意. 淹水胁迫对南五味子和海南红豆幼苗光合特性的影响. 湖南林业科技, 2012, 39(1): 24-27.

Zhang R, Xue L, Guo S H, Yang Z Y. Photosynthetic physiology response of Kadsura longipedunculata and Ormosia pinnata under waterlogging stress. Hunan Forestry Science and Technology, 2012, 39(1): 24-27. (in Chinese)

[26]Havaux M, Tardy F. Temperature-dependent adjustment of thermal stability of photosystemⅡ in vivo：possible involvement of xanthophyll-cycle pigments. Planta, 1996, 198(3): 324-333.

[27]Demmig B, Bjorkman O. Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyⅡ fluorescence and photon yield of O2  evolution in leaves of higher plants. Planta, 1987, 171(2): 171-184.

[28]Hulsebosch R J, Hoff A J, Shuvalov V A. Influence of KF, DCMU and removal of Ca2+ on the high-spin EPR signal of the cytochrome b-599 heme FeⅢ ligated by OH- in chloroplasts. Biochimca et Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics, 1996, 1277(1): 103-106.

[29]陈继峰, 刘三军, 孔庆天, 张世英. 葡萄砧木的抗逆性试验. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2000(2): 16-17.

Chen J F, Liu S J, Kong Q T, Zhang S Y. Study of grape rootstock resistance to unsuitable conditions. Sino-overseas Grapevine and Wine, 2000(2): 16-17. (in Chinese)

[30]王晓芳, 徐月华, 翟衡, 王兆顺, 裴承国, 相昆, 陈锋. 不同葡萄砧穗组合根系构型研究. 果树学报, 2007, 24(3): 293-297.

Wang X F, Xu Y H, Zhai H, Wang Z S, Pei C G, Xiang K, Chen F. Studies on root system architectures of different grapevine scion/rootstock combinations. Journal of Fruit Science, 2007, 24(3): 293-297. (in Chinese)
[1] WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[2] DU JinXia,LI YiSha,LI MeiLin,CHEN WenHan,ZHANG MuQing. Evaluation of Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in Different Sugarcane Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130.
[3] MA YuQuan,WANG XiaoLong,LI YuMei,WANG XiaoDi,LIU FengZhi,WANG HaiBo. Differences in Nutrient Absorption and Utilization of 87-1 Grape Variety Under Different Rootstock Facilities [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3822-3830.
[4] NIE XingHua, ZHENG RuiJie, ZHAO YongLian, CAO QingQin, QIN Ling, XING Yu. Genetic Diversity Evaluation of Castanea in China Based on Fluorescently Labeled SSR [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1739-1750.
[5] XiaoFeng LU,GuoDong DU,Jing SHAO,JingRu ZHANG,HaiLong SUN. Physiological Response of Mitochondrial Function of Strawberry Roots to Exogenous Phenolic Acid [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(5): 1029-1042.
[6] LI KaiFeng,YIN YuHe,WANG Qiong,LIN TuanRong,GUO HuaChun. Correlation Analysis of Volatile Flavor Components and Metabolites Among Potato Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 792-803.
[7] WANG ShiYa,ZHENG DianFeng,XIANG HongTao,FENG NaiJie,LIU Ya,LIU MeiLing,JIN Dan,MOU BaoMin. Damage of AsA-GSH Cycle of Soybean Leaves Under Waterlogging Stress at Initial Flowing Stage and the Mitigation Effect of Uniconazole [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(2): 271-285.
[8] ZHANG BinBin,CAI ZhiXiang,SHEN ZhiJun,YAN Juan,MA RuiJuan,YU MingLiang. Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Characters in Germplasm Resources of Ornamental Peaches [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2406-2418.
[9] Ge SONG,DongMei SHI,XiaoYing ZENG,GuangYi JIANG,Na JIANG,Qing YE. Quality Barrier Characteristics of Cultivated Layer for Sloping Farmland in Purple Hilly Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(7): 1397-1410.
[10] LI Ying,ZHANG ShuHang,GUO Yan,ZHANG XinFang,WANG GuangPeng. Catkin Phenotypic Diversity and Cluster Analysis of 211 Chinese Chestnut Germplasms [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(22): 4667-4682.
[11] QU YuJie, SUN JunLing, GENG XiaoLi, WANG Xiao, Zareen Sarfraz, JIA YinHua, PAN ZhaoE, HE ShouPu, GONG WenFang, WANG LiRu, PANG BaoYin, DU XiongMing. Correlation Between Genetic Distance of Parents and Heterosis in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(9): 1488-1501.
[12] SUN Jian,YAN XiaoWen,LE MeiWang,RAO YueLiang,YAN TingXian,YE YanYing,ZHOU HongYing. Physiological Response Mechanism of Drought Stress in Different Drought-Tolerance Genotypes of Sesame During Flowering Period [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7): 1215-1226.
[13] ZHAO Yong,ZHAO PeiFang,HU Xin,ZHAO Jun,ZAN FengGang,YAO Li,ZHAO LiPing,YANG Kun,QIN Wei,XIA HongMing,LIU JiaYong. Evaluation of 317 Sugarcane Germplasm Based on Agronomic Traits Rating Data [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(4): 602-615.
[14] BAI YiXiong, ZHENG XueQing, YAO YouHua, YAO XiaoHua, WU KunLun. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Traits in Hulless Barley Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23): 4201-4214.
[15] YUAN YuHao, YANG QingHua, DANG Ke, YANG Pu, GAO JinFeng, GAO XiaoLi, WANG PengKe, LU Ping, LIU MinXuan, FENG BaiLi. Salt-Tolerance Evaluation and Physiological Response of Salt Stress of Broomcorn Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 4066-4078.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd