覆膜方式对间作玉米光合物质生产及水分利用效率的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.03.005

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】This study explored the effects of different mulching methods on the production of photosynthetic substances and water use of maize under the intercropping mode of maize and soybean, aiming to determine the suitable mulching method for maize and soybean plantation in dryland agriculture in northern Shaanxi, so as to provide a basis for high-yield and efficient production of maize and soybean and ecological environment protection. 【Method】This study was conducted in irrigated land and nonirrigated land in 2022, using 'Zhonghuang 30' soybean and 'Xianyu 335' maize as materials. The two-factor complete randomized design was carried out, and the control group combined single crop (maize “M”, soybean “S”) and film mulching (bare land, interbrane “J”), and the test group combined intercropping crop (maize “M”, soybean “S”) and film mulching (bare land, interbrane “J” and whole film “Q”), with a total of 13 treatment groups. The characteristics changes of growth, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency of intercropped maize under different mulching methods were studied. 【Result】 (1) From jointing to silking stage, the growth space of intercropped maize was limited, resulting in a disadvantage in aboveground biomass of intercropped maize compared with monoculture. The biomass during the jointing stage of S/MQ, SQ/MJ, and SQ/MQ was 5.1%, 6.3%, and 1.7% higher than that of monoculture M, respectively; under intercropping, SJ/MJ maize plants had the fastest growth rate and a sharp increase in growth. SQ/MQ S/M, S/MJ, SQ/MJ, and SJ/M in dry land had a better promoting effect on the photosynthetic products of maize during the silking stage, and the aboveground biomass was 0.6%-105.9% higher than that of monoculture M. (2) To some extent, intercropping and mulching treatments improved the photosynthetic characteristics of maize, and the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) content of paddy maize. There was a certain degree of positive relationship between stomatal conductance (Gs), cellular CO₂ concentration (Ci) and transpiration rate (Tr). The photosynthetic parameters of SQ/MJ and SJ/MQ were relatively high, while SJ/M and SQ/MQ were lower than non film coated S/M; there was a weak negative correlation between Pn and Ci in dryland maize, and the effect of maize mulching was not significant among different treatments. The Gs of intercropping treatment was 5.7% -38.1% lower than that of monoculture M, and Tr was also reduced by 5.6% -25.6%. Only the Pn of SJ/M and SQ/M, as well as the Ci of SQ/MJ and S/M, were higher than monoculture M. (3) The intercropping film mulching had a significant impact on water use efficiency (WUE). The WUE of the intercropping treatment was 41.1% -74.0% higher than that of monoculture M, among which SJ/M, S/M and S/MJ were relatively high; among all treatments in arid land, SQ/MJ had the highest WUE (19.04 kg∙mm^-1∙hm^-2), followed by SJ/MJ (17.07 kg∙mm^-1∙hm^-2), and the WUE of SJ/M and SQ/M was significantly lower than that of monoculture M by 26.7% and 20.6%, respectively. (4) Compared with monoculture M, intercropping S/MJ between irrigated land and dry land SJ/M and SJ/MJ maize increased yields by 76.8%, 73.0%, and 72.3%, respectively, while soybean yield reduction was relatively less among all intercropping treatments, demonstrating higher economic benefits; dry land intercropping SJ/MJ and SJ/MQ maize increased production by 17.1% and 23.5%, respectively, while economic benefits decreased by 17.5% and 22.8%, respectively. 【Conclusion】Compared with single cropping M, SJ/MJ model improved the photosynthetic performance, biomass, and yield of maize in irrigated land, and improved system economic benefit and promoted water use efficiency. In dry land, through the complementary effect and resource allocation in the intercropping system, it maintained maize yield and improved water use efficiency, but the increase of total input in agricultural materials reduced the economic feasibility. Therefore, in the dryland agriculture of Northern Shaanxi, the intercropping planting pattern of maize with degradable film and soybeans with degradable film was recommended for both irrigated land and moderately irrigated dry farm, aiming to enhance water use efficiency, increase production and profitability, and promote sustainable ecological agriculture development.

Key words: coating method, intercropping, maize, yield, photosynthetic characteristics, water use efficiency

WANG JiaXin, HU JingYi, ZHANG Wei, WEI Qian, WANG Tao, WANG XiaoLin, ZHANG Xiong, ZHANG PanPan. Effects of Different Mulching Methods on the Production of Photosynthetic Substances and Water Use Efficiency of Intercropped Maize[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(3): 460-477.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Effects of different film covering patterns on yield and components of maize"

地点 Location	处理 Treatment		有效穗数 Effective ear number (No./hm²)	单穗粒数 Grains per ear	单株粒重 Grain weight per plant (g/plant)	百粒重 100-grain weight (g)	产量 Grain yield (kg·hm^-2)
水地 Irrigated farmland	CK	M	45833±5069d	717.8±23.5a	280.7±21.3a	31.9±1.3bcd	6956.8±62.9d
	CK	MJ	46667±1667d	703.8±46.3abc	261.2±7.9ab	30.2±1.1cd	8144.2±267.6d
	S	M	60667±2404bc	581.9±33.9d	203.1±17.8c	33.4±1.3abc	11687.9±402.8ab
		MJ	55333±667bcd	692.0±20.5abc	227.9±13.6bc	36.0±0.8a	12299.6±203.5a
		MQ	53333±667cd	720.3±31.2a	240.4±9.5abc	33.7±2.2abc	9839.3±251.3c
	SJ	M	58000±4163bc	639.5±26.2abcd	212.0±12.9bc	32.5±0.7abcd	12034.5±416.5a
		MJ	65333±4055b	639.5±22.6abcd	226.0±21.3bc	32.4±0.4abcd	11987.3±623.4ab
		MQ	78667±3712a	612.9±29.0bcd	222.8±8.8bc	28.9±0.1d	10837.0±675.8abc
	SQ	M	59333±4667bc	602.6±51.9cd	216.6±23.7bc	33.1±1.7abc	10489.9±685.0bc
		MJ	52667±3712cd	637.8±24.9abcd	218.6±3.5bc	32.9±0.9abc	11154.2±537.6abc
		MQ	56667±2906bcd	710.0±24.9ab	234.4±20.2abc	34.6±1.0ab	11249.8±428.9abc
旱地 Nonirrigated farmland	CK	M	39167±1667a	668.0±34.2ab	213.2±8.7b	32.8±1.1abc	6748.6±119.4bc
	CK	MJ	38333±2205a	513.3±32.9d	166.0±11.7c	30.8±0.7bc	6791.3±166.5bc
	S	M	41333±1764a	724.5±24.3a	223.4±11.1ab	36.8±2.0a	6445.0±205.7bcd
		MJ	37333±1764a	381.0±25.4e	156.3±4.2cd	33.3±1.9abc	6624.2±298.9bcd
		MQ	38667±667a	525.0±27.1cd	155.6±6.3cd	32.8±1.1abc	6844.0±878.5bc
	SJ	M	38000±1155a	408.0±18.6e	131.1±10.2de	30.5±0.4bc	5209.4±156.1d
		MJ	39333±1764a	614.5±19.3bc	154.7±8.4cd	29.8±0.7c	7901.0±838.2ab
		MQ	36667±2906a	515.5±50.0d	120.1±9.9e	31.3±1.8bc	7115.8±428.7abc
	SQ	M	39333±667a	512.5±19.0d	154.5±4.7cd	29.7±1.4c	5609.4±564.4cd
		MJ	40667±1764a	581.5±36.0bcd	195.1±15.9b	31.7±2.8bc	8335.8±327.6a
		MQ	36667±1333a	713.0±26.5a	247.9±11.3a	35.1±1.9ab	6883.8±89.7bc
变异来源 Variation source
地点 Location			**	**	**	NS	**
处理 Treatment			**	**	**	**	**
地点×处理 Location ×Treatment			**	**	**	NS	**

Table 1

Table 2

Effects of mulching techniques on intercropped soybean yield and its yield components"

地点 Location	处理 Treatment		单株荚数 Pods number per plant (No./plant)	单株粒数 Seeds number per plant (No./plant)	单株粒重 Grain weight per plant (g/plant)	百粒重 100-grain weight (g)	产量 Grain yield (kg·hm^-2)
水地 Irrigated farmland	CK	S	54.0±8.3a	141.5±21.5a	38.2±6.2a	23.3±1.1a	1600.6±34.4b
	CK	SJ	34.8±4.9bc	93.4±16.5b	32.5±6.1ab	25.2±0.4a	1933.5±73.4a
	S	M	24.8±2.8cde	65.8±8.4bcd	14.4±1.4cd	24.4±0.8a	691.0±48.6cd
		MJ	22.4±2.0cde	61.4±7.9bcd	19.3±4.6cd	22.8±0.5a	623.7±26.7d
		MQ	14.4±2.5e	36.3±6.6d	9.4±1.9d	23.5±1.1a	747.9±39.4cd
	SJ	M	24.7±3.9cde	56.3±8.7cd	12.3±0.8d	22.7±0.4a	808.8±39.7c
		MJ	38.5±4.7b	90.9±13.5bc	23.2±2.2bc	22.6±0.7a	753.0±62.7cd
		MQ	17.4±2.7de	41.0±7.7d	10.5±1.5d	22.0±0.7b	650.1±52.9cd
	SQ	M	16.4±1.9e	38.6±5.9d	8.9±1.3d	23.2±0.7a	705.3±70.3cd
		MJ	30.4±4.5bcd	71.6±7.2bcd	17.9±2.5cd	24.2±1.0ab	754.9±57.1cd
		MQ	18.6±2.8de	48.9±6.4d	13.8±2.0cd	24.2±0.7a	744.4±57.6cd
旱地 Nonirrigated farmland	CK	M	22.5±2.0bcd	43.1±2.9bc	7.7±1.3cd	23.7±0.8a	1485.8±72.0b
	CK	MJ	25.5±2.6ab	58.1±10.5ab	14.4±3.4a	23.6±1.0ab	1653.9±32.6a
	S	M	20.8±1.6bcd	42.5±1.8bc	10.9±1.9abcd	22.0±0.4cd	523.6±24.0de
		MJ	31.5±4.9a	64.6±10.8a	13.8±2.5ab	21.3±0.5c	609.0±13.2cd
		MQ	23.6±2.2bc	51.1±5.8abc	8.2±0.8cd	20.1±0.7d	510.1±32.2e
	SJ	M	18.0±1.8bcd	43.9±5.1bc	8.8±0.9cd	21.1±0.3d	595.4±20.9de
		MJ	16.5±0.7cd	36.5±2.6c	7.4±0.6d	22.5±0.1b	594.6±31.1de
		MQ	20.4±1.9bcd	51.1±4.4abc	9.4±0.7bcd	22.0±0.9d	585.6±19.9de
	SQ	M	17.8±2.7bcd	35.5±3.5c	8.4±0.5cd	21.9±0.6d	584.6±34.1de
		MJ	15.0±2.8d	37.3±3.6c	8.3±1.0cd	21.8±0.5c	592.6±31.0de
		MQ	24.3±2.3abc	58.9±5.8ab	12.4±1.3abc	22.8±1.0cd	689.1±15.0c
变异来源 Variation source
地点 Location			**	**	**	**	**
处理 Treatment			**	**	**	*	**
地点×处理 Location ×Treatment			**	**	**	NS	NS

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

References 48

[1]	钱玉平, 田慧慧, 程宏波, 马建涛, 柴雨葳, 李亚伟, 柴守玺. 秸秆覆盖及播种方式对马铃薯耗水特性和产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(6): 826-834.
	QIAN Y P, TIAN H H, CHENG H B, MA J T, CHAI Y W, LI Y W, CHAI S X. Effects of straw mulching and sowing methods on water consumption characteristics and yield of potato in arid region of Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(6): 826-834. (in Chinese)
[2]	张晓芳, 贾志宽, 朱翠林, 张鹏, 康乐. 水分胁迫对大豆结荚期光合生理及生物量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(4): 97-104.
	ZHANG X F, JIA Z K, ZHU C L, ZHANG P, KANG L. Effect of water stress on photosynthesis and biomass of soybean during its pod filling stage. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2012, 30(4): 97-104. (in Chinese)
[3]	李宗善, 杨磊, 王国梁, 侯建, 信忠保, 刘国华, 傅伯杰. 黄土高原水土流失治理现状、问题及对策. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7398-7409.
	LI Z S, YANG L, WANG G L, HOU J, XIN Z B, LIU G H, FU B J. The management of soil and water conservation in the Loess Plateau of China: Present situations, problems, and counter-solutions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7398-7409. (in Chinese)
[4]	隋鹏祥, 有德宝, 安俊朋, 张文可, 田平, 梅楠, 王美佳, 王沣, 苏思慧, 齐华. 秸秆还田方式与施氮量对春玉米产量及干物质和氮素积累、转运的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(2): 316-324.
	SUI P X, YOU D B, AN J P, ZHANG W K, TIAN P, MEI N, WANG M J, WANG F, SU S H, QI H. Effects of straw management and nitrogen application on spring maize yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and transfer. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(2): 316-324. (in Chinese)
[5]	梁福琴, 张明君, 张强, 李得孝, 党蓓蕾, 李霞. 覆盖降解渗水地膜对陕北春大豆生长发育和产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2018, 37(5): 723-729.
	LIANG F Q, ZHANG M J, ZHANG Q, LI D X, DANG B L, LI X. Effect of soil surface covered by degradable water-permeability film on growth and yield of spring soybean in northern Shaanxi Province. Soybean Science, 2018, 37(5): 723-729. (in Chinese)
[6]	赵鸿, 蔡迪花, 王鹤龄, 杨阳, 王润元, 张凯, 齐月, 赵福年, 陈斐, 岳平, 王兴, 姚玉璧, 雷俊, 魏星星. 干旱灾害对粮食安全的影响及其应对技术研究进展与展望. 干旱气象, 2023, 41(2): 187-206. doi: 10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2023)-02-0187
	ZHAO H, CAI D H, WANG H L, YANG Y, WANG R Y, ZHANG K, QI Y, ZHAO F N, CHEN F, YUE P, WANG X, YAO Y B, LEI J, WEI X X. Progress and prospect on impact of drought disaster on food security and its countermeasures. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2023, 41(2): 187-206. (in Chinese)
[7]	魏文良, 刘路, 仇恒浩. 有机无机肥配施对我国主要粮食作物产量和氮肥利用效率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(8): 1384-1394.
	WEI W L, LIU L, QIU H H. Effects of different organic resources application combined with chemical fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of main grain crops in China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(8): 1384-1394. (in Chinese)
[8]	WANG X L, REN Y Y, ZHANG S Q, CHEN Y L, WANG N. Applications of organic manure increased maize (Zea mays L.) yield and water productivity in a semi-arid region. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 187: 88-98.
[9]	钱锐, 刘洋, 郭茹, 杨玲, 梁霞, 张鹏, 任小龙, 贾志宽. 覆膜秸秆还田对旱作农田土壤水温及春玉米产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(4): 532-544.
	QIAN R, LIU Y, GUO R, YANG L, LIANG X, ZHANG P, REN X L, JIA Z K. Effects of straw returning to field and plastic film mulching on soil water, temperature and maize yield in upland fields. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 532-544. (in Chinese)
[10]	姜文洋, 陈俊南, 昝志曼, 汪江涛, 郑宾, 刘领, 刘娟, 焦念元. 单粒播种与施磷对间作花生种间竞争和生长的调控效应. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(23): 4660-4670. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.23.008.
	JIANG W Y, CHEN J N, ZAN Z M, WANG J T, ZHENG B, LIU L, LIU J, JIAO N Y. Regulation of single-seed sowing and phosphorus application on interspecific competition and growth of intercropping peanut. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(23): 4660-4670. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.23.008. (in Chinese)
[11]	D’ALPOIM GUEDES J, BUTLER E E. Modeling constraints on the spread of agriculture to Southwest China with thermal niche models. Quaternary International, 2014, 349: 29-41.
[12]	欧阳子龙, 贾湘璐, 石景忠, 韦妙琴, 滕维超. 间作对作物、土壤及微生物影响的研究进展. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(2): 18-30.
	OUYANG Z L, JIA X L, SHI J Z, WEI M Q, TENG W C. Research progress on effects of intercropping on crops, soils and microorganisms. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(2): 18-30. (in Chinese)
[13]	雷雲翔, 应晓成, 沈新平, 刘斌, 蒋敏. 玉米-大豆间作经济与环境效应研究进展. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(S1): 56-60.
	LEI Y X, YING X C, SHEN X P, LIU B, JIANG M. Research progress on economic and environmental effects of corn-soybean intercropping. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2023, 42(S1): 56-60. (in Chinese)
[14]	SCARASCIA-MUGNOZZA G, SCHETTINI E, VOX G, MALINCONICO M, IMMIRZI B, PAGLIARA S. Mechanical properties decay and morphological behaviour of biodegradable films for agricultural mulching in real scale experiment. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2006, 91(11): 2801-2808.
[15]	李小刚, 李凤民. 旱作地膜覆盖农田土壤有机碳平衡及氮循环特征. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(23): 4630-4638. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.23.004.
	LI X G, LI F M. Soil organic carbon balance and nitrogen cycling in plastic film mulched croplands in rainfed farming systems. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(23): 4630-4638. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.23.004. (in Chinese)
[16]	刘广才, 李隆, 黄高宝, 孙建好, 郭天文, 张福锁. 大麦/玉米间作优势及地上部和地下部因素的相对贡献研究. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(9): 1787-1795.
	LIU G C, LI L, HUANG G B, SUN J H, GUO T W, ZHANG F S. Intercropping advantage and contribution of above-ground and below-ground interactions in the barley-maize intercropping. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(9): 1787-1795. (in Chinese)
[17]	李伟绮, 孙建好, 赵建华. 覆膜对玉米间作豌豆干物质积累与分配的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(5): 118-123.
	LI W Q, SUN J H, ZHAO J H. Effects of mulching on dry matter accumulation and distribution in maize-pea intercrop. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2016(5): 118-123. (in Chinese)
[18]	龙大勇, 王小利, 段建军, 何进, 杨宏伟, 徐彬. 覆膜和施肥对玉米大豆间作体系作物氮素吸收和产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(12): 13-20. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0352
	LONG D Y, WANG X L, DUAN J J, HE J, YANG H W, XU B. Effects of plastic film mulching and fertilization on crop nitrogen uptake and yield in maize-soybean intercropping system. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 13-20. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0352
[19]	任金虎, 谢军红, 李玲玲, Lamptey Shirley, Stephen Yeboah, 张明君, 高海强. 种植模式对旱地玉米光合特性和产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(5): 8-13.
	REN J H, XIE J H, LI L L, SHIRLEY L, YEBOAH S, ZHANG M J, GAO H Q. Effects of planting patterns on photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of maize in dryland. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(5): 8-13. (in Chinese)
[20]	张绪成, 王红丽, 于显枫, 侯慧芝, 方彦杰, 马一凡. 半干旱区全膜覆盖垄沟间作种植马铃薯和豆科作物的水热及产量效应. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(3): 468-481. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.03.006.
	ZHANG X C, WANG H L, YU X F, HOU H Z, FANG Y J, MA Y F. The study on the effect of potato and beans intercropping with whole field plastics mulching and ridge-furrow planting on soil thermal-moisture status and crop yield on semi-arid area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(3): 468-481. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.03.006. (in Chinese)
[21]	侯慧芝, 张绪成, 汤瑛芳, 王红丽, 于显枫, 方彦杰, 马一凡. 半干旱区全膜覆盖垄沟种植马铃薯/蚕豆间作的产量和水分效应. 草业学报, 2016, 25(6): 71-80. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015382
	HOU H Z, ZHANG X C, TANG Y F, WANG H L, YU X F, FANG Y J, MA Y F. Effects of potato-fababean intercropping on crop productivity and soil water under a plastic mulch and ridge-furrow planting system in a semiarid area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(6): 71-80. (in Chinese)
[22]	LI Q, LI H B, ZHANG S Q. Yield and water use efficiency of dryland potato in response to plastic film mulching on the Loess Plateau. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science, 2018, 68(2): 175-188.
[23]	WANG L F, CHEN J, SHANGGUAN Z P. Yield responses of wheat to mulching practices in dryland farming on the Loess Plateau. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(5): e0127402.
[24]	覃丽华. 榆林市干旱特征与旱灾风险分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2020.
	QIN L H. Drought characteristics and drought disaster risk analysis in Yulin[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[25]	WANG Z K, WU P T, ZHAO X N, GAO Y, CHEN X L. Water use and crop coefficient of the wheat-maize strip intercropping system for an arid region in northwestern China. Agricultural Water Management, 2015, 161: 77-85.
[26]	宫香伟, 党科, 李境, 罗艳, 赵冠, 杨璞, 高小丽, 高金锋, 王鹏科, 冯佰利. 糜子绿豆间作模式下糜子光合物质生产及水分利用效率. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(22): 4139-4153. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.22.018.
	GONG X W, DANG K, LI J, LUO Y, ZHAO G, YANG P, GAO X L, GAO J F, WANG P K, FENG B L. Effects of different intercropping patterns on photosynthesis production characteristics and water use efficiency of proso millet. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 4139-4153. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.22.018. (in Chinese)
[27]	ZHANG D S, ZHANG L Z, LIU J G, HAN S, WANG Q, EVERS J, LIU J, VAN DER WERF W, LI L. Plant density affects light interception and yield in cotton grown as companion crop in young jujube plantations. Field Crops Research, 2014, 169: 132-139.
[28]	陈启航, 李佳奇, 史建国, 常风云, 段义忠, 贾磊, 陈涛, 宋平戈. 陕北风沙草滩区覆膜对土壤理化性质和春玉米产量的影响. 饲料研究, 2024, 47(2): 96-100.
	CHEN Q H, LI J Q, SHI J G, CHANG F Y, DUAN Y Z, JIA L, CHEN T, SONG P G. Effects of plastic film mulching on soil physicochemical properties and spring maize yield in wind and sand erosion area of northern Shaanxi. Feed Research, 2024, 47(2): 96-100. (in Chinese)
[29]	王小英, 王斌, 王孟, 强羽竹, 李海录, 李振姣, 郭爱琴. 不同覆膜栽培模式对绿豆主要农艺性状及产量的影响. 农业科技通讯, 2023(9): 79-82, 91.
	WANG X Y, WANG B, WANG M, QIANG Y Z, LI H L, LI Z J, GUO A Q. Effects of different film mulching cultivation models on main agronomic traits and yield of mung beans. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023(9): 79-82, 91. (in Chinese)
[30]	徐佳星, 封涌涛, 叶玉莲, 张润泽, 胡昌录, 雷同, 张树兰. 地膜覆盖条件下黄土高原玉米产量及水分利用效应分析. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(12): 2349-2359. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.12.004.
	XU J X, FENG Y T, YE Y L, ZHANG R Z, HU C L, LEI T, ZHANG S L. Effects of plastic film mulching on yield and water use of maize in the Loess Plateau. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(12): 2349-2359. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.12.004. (in Chinese)
[31]	蔡莉娟, 赵财, 冯福学, 于爱忠, 刘畅, 柴强. 一膜覆二年和灌水量对玉米间作豌豆水分利用效率的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2018, 53(1): 29-34, 41.
	CAI L J, ZHAO C, FENG F X, YU A Z, LIU C, CHAI Q. Effects of plastic film mulching for two years and irrigation amount on water use efficiency of maize-pea intercropping system. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2018, 53(1): 29-34, 41. (in Chinese)
[32]	方旭飞, 张钟莉莉, 王丽学, 栾策. 不同覆盖方式和种植模式对土壤水热与玉米产量的影响. 节水灌溉, 2017(12): 39-43.
	FANG X F, ZHANG Z L L, WANG L X, LUAN C. Effects of different mulching method and planting patterns on soil moisture, temperature and maize yield. Water Saving Irrigation, 2017(12): 39-43. (in Chinese)
[33]	梁晓阳, 沈欣, 王传娟, 张彦群, 王东博, 王建东, 郭清华. 覆膜类型对春玉米农田盐热变化及产量的影响. 排灌机械工程学报, 2023, 41(11): 1179-1188.
	LIANG X Y, SHEN X, WANG C J, ZHANG Y Q, WANG D B, WANG J D, GUO Q H. Effects of different films mulching on salt and heat changes and yield of spring maize farmland. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2023, 41(11): 1179-1188. (in Chinese)
[34]	张晓娜, 陈平, 杜青, 周颖, 任建锐, 金福, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米/大豆、玉米/花生间作对作物氮素吸收及结瘤固氮的影响. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(8): 1183-1194.
	ZHANG X N, CHEN P, DU Q, ZHOU Y, REN J R, JIN F, YANG W Y, YONG T W. Effects of maize/soybean and maize/peanut intercropping systems on crops nitrogen uptake and nodulation nitrogen fixation. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(8): 1183-1194. (in Chinese)
[35]	张雷昌, 汤利, 董艳, 郑毅. 根系互作影响玉米大豆间作作物氮吸收. 云南农业大学学报 (自然科学), 2016, 31(6): 1111-1119.
	ZHANG L C, TANG L, DONG Y, ZHENG Y. Nitrogen absorption of crops affected by root interaction in maize and soybean intercropping. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2016, 31(6):1111-1119. (in Chinese)
[36]	LIAKATAS A, CLARK J A, MONTEITH J L. Measurements of the heat balance under plastic mulches. Part I. Radiation balance and soil heat flux. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1986, 36(3): 227-239.
[37]	秦德志, 崔文芳, 陈静, 刘剑, 秦丽, 王利平, 赵永来, 王利鹤. 玉米大豆间作干物质积累和氮磷吸收利用的边际效应. 西南农业学报, 2024, 37(3): 552-560.
	QIN D Z, CUI W F, CHEN J, LIU J, QIN L, WANG L P, ZHAO Y L, WANG L H. Marginal effect of dry matter accumulation and nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and utilization in maize and soybean intercropping. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 37(3): 552-560. (in Chinese)
[38]	赵建华, 孙建好, 李伟绮. 覆膜对玉米‖豌豆作物生产力及种间互作的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(2): 164-169.
	ZHAO J H, SUN J H, LI W Q. Effect of film mulching on productivity and interspecific interaction in maize-pea intercropping system. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2020, 38(2): 164-169. (in Chinese)
[39]	吕晴晴, 何宁, 张永江, 迟宝杰, 张艳军, 张冬梅, 董合忠. 间作和轮作通过根冠互作调控作物产量形成的生理生态机制. 植物生理学报, 2023, 59(7): 1277-1290.
	LÜ Q Q, HE N, ZHANG Y J, CHI B J, ZHANG Y J, ZHANG D M, DONG H Z. Eco-physiological mechanism of crop yield formation regulated by intercropping and rotation through root-shoot interaction. Plant Physiology Journal, 2023, 59(7): 1277-1290. (in Chinese)
[40]	高梦钒, 王鑫鑫, 陈任强, 高惠嫣, 柴春岭, 刘宏权. 禾本-豆科间作水分高效利用研究进展. 节水灌溉, 2024(6): 77-86. doi: 10.12396/jsgg.2023505
	GAO M F, WANG X X, CHEN R Q, GAO H Y, CHAI C L, LIU H Q. Research progress of water efficient use in graminus-legume intercropping. Water Saving Irrigation, 2024(6): 77-86. (in Chinese)
[41]	郑皓远, 陈喜凤, 郭丹阳, 陈蕊, 玛丽亚穆·吾斯曼, 刘颖, 谷岩. 条带间作对玉米大豆光能利用特征、产量及经济收入的影响. 东北农业科学, 2023, 48(6): 1-5.
	ZHENG H Y, CHEN X F, GUO D Y, CHEN R, MARIAMU U, LIU Y, GU Y. Effects of light energy utilization characteristics, yield and economic output of maize-soybean strip intercropping. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 48(6): 1-5. (in Chinese)
[42]	殷民兴, 赵财, 葛丽丽, 程宝钰. 间作及减量灌溉对农田土壤温室气体排放的互作效应. 干旱地区农业研究, 2024, 42(1): 214-225.
	YIN M X, ZHAO C, GE L L, CHENG B Y. Interaction effect of intercropping and reduced irrigation on greenhouse gas emissions from farmland soil. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2024, 42(1): 214-225. (in Chinese)
[43]	王科捷, 杨乔乔, 王佳, 卢圆明, 王晓苹, 康建宏. 水氮协同对玉米光合特性及产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(7): 48-55.
	WANG K J, YANG Q Q, WANG J, LU Y M, WANG X P, KANG J H. Synergistic effects of water and nitrogen on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of maize. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2023(7): 48-55. (in Chinese)
[44]	张建军, 樊廷录, 党翼, 赵刚, 王磊, 李尚中. 揭膜时期和施氮量对陇东旱塬春玉米群体生理指标及产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(4): 90-96.
	ZHANG J J, FAN T L, DANG Y, ZHAO G, WANG L, LI S Z. Effects of uncovering plastic film period and nitrogen amount on the growth indexes and yield of spring maize in Loess Plateau of East Gansu. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2016(4): 90-96. (in Chinese)
[45]	屈俊成, 蒋傲楠, 闫静琦, 卢海博, 赵海超, 黄智鸿. 寒旱区不同覆膜方式对春玉米土壤含水量及产量的影响. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版), 2019, 35(3): 42-47.
	QU J C, JIANG A N, YAN J Q, LU H B, ZHAO H C, HUANG Z H. Effects of mulching methods on soil water condition and yield of spring maize in cold and dry region. Journal of Hebei North University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 35(3): 42-47. (in Chinese)
[46]	CHEN X L, WU P T, ZHAO X N, PERSAUD N. Effect of different mulches on harvested rainfall use efficiency for corn (Zea mays L.) in semi-arid regions of northwest China. Arid Land Research and Management, 2013, 27(3): 272-285.
[47]	LI S X, WANG Z H, MALHI S S, LI S Q, GAO Y J, TIAN X H. Chapter 7 nutrient and water management effects on crop production, and nutrient and water use efficiency in dryland areas of China. Advances in Agronomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009: 223-265.
[48]	杨清山, 孙敏, 高志强, 张慧芋, 张娟, 梁艳妃, 李念念. 黄土高原休闲期深松后覆盖播种对旱地小麦产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(2): 158-166.
	YANG Q S, SUN M, GAO Z Q, ZHANG H Y, ZHANG J, LIANG Y F, LI N N. Effect of sowing-mulching following subsoiling in fallow period on wheat yield in arid area on the Loess Plateau. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(2): 158-166. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

年份 Year	处理 Treatment		经济效益 Economic benefits (Yuan/hm²)				土地当量比 Land equivalent ratio
年份 Year	处理 Treatment		农资总投入 Total material input	总收入 General income	经济效益 Economic benefit	产投比 Input-output ratio	土地当量比 Land equivalent ratio
水地 Irrigated farmland	CK	M	8475.0	27753±137f	19278±137c	3.27±0.02b
	CK	MJ	9039.0	32814±1088e	23775±1088ab	3.63±0.12a
	S	M	12367.5	38777±912abc	26409±912a	3.13±0.07b	1.31±0.02cde
		MJ	13252.5	40088±406ab	26835±406a	3.03±0.03b	1.39±0.05bcde
		MQ	14341.5	34021±863de	19679±863c	2.37±0.06c	1.36±0.13bcde
	SJ	M	12952.5	40366±895a	27414±895a	3.12±0.07b	1.17±0.01e
		MJ	13117.5	39934±1631ab	26816±1631a	3.04±0.13b	1.57±0.11ab
		MQ	14026.5	36223±1989bcde	22197±1989bc	2.58±0.14c	1.45±0.05abcd
	SQ	M	15315.0	35572±1744cde	20257±1744bc	2.32±0.11c	1.23±0.08de
		MJ	15300.0	37662±1498abcd	22362±1498bc	2.46±0.10c	1.63±0.03a
		MQ	16389.0	37867±810abcd	21478±810bc	2.31±0.05c	1.48±0.01abc
旱地 Nonirrigated farmland	CK	M	7575.0	26559±396abc	18984±396a	3.51±0.05a
	CK	MJ	8139.0	27589±570ab	19450±570a	3.39±0.07a
	S	M	11467.5	23502±408cde	12035±408bcd	2.05±0.04bc	2.11±0.04ab
		MJ	12352.5	24457±869bcd	12105±869bcd	1.98±0.07cd	2.16±0.01ab
		MQ	13441.5	24523±2379bcd	11081±2379cde	1.82±0.18cde	1.88±0.06c
	SJ	M	12052.5	20507±298e	8455±298ef	1.70±0.03def	2.23±0.03a
		MJ	12217.5	27877±2174ab	15660±2174b	2.28±0.18b	2.19±0.08a
		MQ	13126.5	25677±1063abc	12551±1063bcd	1.96±0.08cd	1.97±0.11bc
	SQ	M	14415.0	21544±1534de	7129±1534f	1.49±0.11f	1.95±0.09bc
		MJ	14400.0	29058±735a	14658±735bc	2.02±0.05bc	2.08±0.08abc
		MQ	15489.0	25603±210abc	10114±210def	1.65±0.01ef	2.08±0.03abc

Effects of Different Mulching Methods on the Production of Photosynthetic Substances and Water Use Efficiency of Intercropped Maize

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 48

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2^# and Changbai7^# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2]	WANG YaFei, YAN Peng, XUE JinTao, DONG XueRui, MENG FanQi, GUO LiNa, LUO Yi, ZHANG Juan, DONG ZhiQiang, LU Lin. Effects of Ethephon-Glycine Betaine-Salicylic Acid Mixture on Root System Architecture, Physiological Function and Yield of Maize Under Heat Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1439-1455.
[3]	WANG YuPing, FU Zhi, SUN JiaYing, MU XiaoMeng, LIU HuiLin, GUO JinYun, SONG WenJing, HOU LeiPing, ZHAO HaiLiang. Evaluation of the Mitigating Effect and Application Efficacy of Melatonin Applied at the Seedling Stage on Short-Term Chilling Stress in Tomato Plants [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535.
[4]	WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[5]	ZHOU XinJie, REN Hao, CHEN YingLong, ZHANG JiWang, ZHAO Bin, REN BaiZhao, LIU Peng, WANG HongZhang. Effects of Calcium Peroxide on Root Morphology and Yield Formation of Summer Maize in Waterlogging Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[6]	HE JiHang, ZHANG Qing, LÜ XiangYue, XUE JiQuan, XU ShuTu, LIU JianChao. Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency of Different Stay-Green Maize Hybrids [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[7]	LI YongJuan, ZHANG YueTong, WANG YiBo, ZHAO ChangJiang, SONG Jie, CHEN XueLi, YAO Qin. Effects of Biochar Application on the Abundance and Community Composition of Nitrogen-Fixing Microbial nifH Gene in Soybean Rotation and Continuous Cropping Systems [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[8]	LI SiYuan, LI HongPing, CHANG HongQing, ZHANG SenYan, LI SiJia, CUI XinFei, QIAO Po, ZENG Bo, LIU GuiZhen, LIU TianXue, TANG JiHua, LI ChaoHai. Effects of Density Increase on Dynamic Change of Yield and Agronomic Traits of Maize Cultivars with Different Plant Heights [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 967-984.
[9]	DONG JinLong, ZHAO Ying, YU HaiBing, LÜ JianYe, QIN JiaQi, LIANG Chen, MING Bo, LI ShaoKun. Multi-Model Elucidating of Nutritional Quality Contributions to Maize Kernel Test Weight and Regional Heterogeneity [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[10]	HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[11]	GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[12]	XIAN QingLin, XIAO JianKe, GAO AQing, GAO LiChuang, LIU Yang. Effects of Planting Patterns Combined with Soil Moisture Measurement and Supplementary Irrigation on the Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 589-601.
[13]	YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[14]	YANG Rui, CHEN JingDong, HUANG Ying, XIE LingLi, ZHANG XueKun, ZHOU DengWen, LIU QingYun, XU JinSong, XU BenBo. Genetic Improvement and Configuration Analysis of High-Yield Rapeseed Lines in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 250-264.
[15]	CHEN GuiPing, WEI JinGui, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WANG FeiEr, QIU HaiLong, FENG FuXue, YIN Wen. Synergistic Effects of Wide-Narrow Row and Density Enhancement on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Resource Utilization of Maize in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.