芍药耐热性评价及其鉴定指标筛选

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.23.015

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 The multivariate statistical analysis method was used to evaluate the heat-tolerance of different herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) varieties, to screen the heat-tolerance identification indexes of peony, and finally to establish a more comprehensive and reliable heat-tolerance evaluation system of peony. 【Method】 In this study, 140 peony varieties were used as materials, and field experiments were used to measure 8 morphological and structural indexes, including heat damage index, plant height, crown width, and SPAD value; at the same time, 13 physiological indexes, such as malondialdehyde and relative electrical conductivity, were measured in August after high-temperature stress in summer. Correlation analysis, subordination function method, principal component analysis, cluster analysis and stepwise regression analysis were used to comprehensively evaluate the peony heat-tolerance and to screen the identification indexes of heat-tolerance. 【Result】 There were different degrees of variation among the 21 indicators, and the variation coefficient ranged from 6.66% to 78.02%. The variation coefficient was shown as follows: Catalase (CAT)>POD>Pn>qN>SOD>stomatal density>barrier tissue thickness/sponge tissue thickness>SSC>SPC>heat damage index>SPAD>Y(Ⅱ)>b>MDA>Y(NO)>crown width>leaf thickness>plant height>REC>Fv/Fm>Hue angle (H), among which, CATwas the largest coefficient of variation, and H was the smallest coefficient of variation; through the correlation analysis of each index, it was found that X₁ (heat damage index) and X₂ (plant height), X₃ (crown width), X₄ (SPAD), X₇ (Fv/Fm), X₁₂ (leaf thickness), X₁₇ (SSC ) were extremely significantly negatively correlated, which were significantly negatively correlated with X₆ (Pn), X₈ [Y(Ⅱ)], X₁₃ (stomatal density), X₂₀ (CAT), while they were extremely significantly positively correlated with X₅ (REC), X₉ [Y(NO)], X₁₆ (MDA) and X₁₈ (SPC). There were different degrees of correlation among the indicators, which was relatively complicated; 21 indicators were extracted into 7 principal component factors through the principal component analysis method, and the contribution rates were 20.50%, 11.66%, 8.24%, 7.24%, 7.06%, 5.31%, and 4.85%, respectively, while the cumulative contribution rate reached 64.87%; the comprehensive score (W) of 140 peony varieties were calculated by the membership function analysis method. On this basis, cluster analysis was used to classify the peony cultivars into four types of heat resistance: “excellent” “good” “medium” and “poor”. The “excellent” type accounted for 14.3%, “good” type accounted for 26.4%, “medium” type accounted for 46.4%, and “poor” type accounted for 12.9%; the stepwise regression analysis was further used to establish the optimal linear regression equation: W=0.228-0.166X₁+0.002X₄+0.325X₇-0.257X₉+0.112X₁₀+0.00028X₁₃+0.002X₁₇+0.00015X₁₉+0.001X₂₀, and 9 indicators were selected from 21 indicators (heat damage index), including X₁(heat damage index), X₄ (SPAD), X₇ (Fv/Fm), X₉ [Y(NO)], X₁₀ (qN), X₁₃ (pore density), X₁₇ (SSC), X₁₉ (SOD), and X₂₀ (CAT), which were used as identification peony indicators of heat-resistance. 【Conclusion】 By using multivariate statistical analysis method to evaluate the heat resistance of peony, 140 peony varieties were divided into 4 categories (excellent, good, medium, and poor). 9 indexes including heat damage index and SPAD value were screened as identification indexes of heat-resistance of peony, to quickly evaluate the heat-resistant ability of peony, thereby significantly improving the efficiency of heat-resistant identification of peony.

Key words: herbaceous peony, heat-tolerance, principal component analysis, subordination function methods, comprehensive evaluation system

HOU ZhaoYu, GONG YiZhao, QIAN Yi, CHENG ZhuoYa, TAO Jun, ZHAO DaQiu. Evaluation of Heat Tolerance of Herbaceous Peony and Screening of Its Identification Indices[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(23): 4742-4756.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.23.015

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2023/V56/I23/4742

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Number of herbaceous peony cultivars for test"

编号 Number	品种 Cultivar	编号 Number	品种 Cultivar	编号 Number	品种 Variety	编号 Number	品种 Cultivar	编号 Number	品种 Cultivar
SY1	胜桃花 Sheng Taohua	SY29	雨润奇花 Yurun Qihua	SY57	红玫瑰 Hong Meigui	SY85	玛瑙绣球 Manao Xiuqiu	SY113	粉绫娇艳 Fenling Jiaoyan
SY2	种生粉 Zhongsheng Fen	SY30	玉楼红星 Yulou Hongxing	SY58	红盘彩球 Hongpan Caiqiu	SY86	墨楼金辉 Molou Jinhui	SY114	粉楼 Fen Lou
SY3	紫兰系金 Zilan Xijin	SY31	赵园粉 Zhaoyuan Fen	SY59	红线绣玉 Hongxian Xiuyu	SY87	墨蕴 Mo Yun	SY115	粉楼插翠 Fenlou Chacui
SY4	墨紫含金 Mozi Hanjin	SY32	赵园红 Zhaoyuan Hong	SY60	红绣针 Hong Xiuzhen	SY88	墨紫冠芳 Mozi Guanfang	SY116	粉楼殿春 Fenlou Dianchun
SY5	杨妃出浴 Yangfei Chuyu	SY33	朱砂点玉 Zhusha Dianyu	SY61	红艳遇霜 Hongyan Yushuang	SY89	墨紫含金 Mozi Hanjin	SY117	粉盘金辉 Fenpan Jinhui
SY6	粉珠盘 Fenzhu Pan	SY34	珠光 Zhu Guang	SY62	红银针 Hong Yinzhen	SY90	墨紫绫 Mozi Ling	SY118	粉盘盛宴 Fenpan Shengyan
SY7	向阳奇花 Xiangyang Qihua	SY35	烛光粉玉 Zhuguang Fenyu	SY63	红羽球 Hong Yuqiu	SY91	鸟巢 Niao Chao	SY119	粉银针 Fen Yinzhen
SY8	红峰 Hong Feng	SY36	紫光霞佩 Ziguangxiapei	SY64	湖水荡霞 Hushui Dangyang	SY92	盘托金沙 Pantuo Jinsha	SY120	粉银妆 Fen Yinzhuang
SY9	巧玲 Qiao Ling	SY37	紫红剪绒 Zihong Jianrong	SY65	皇冠粉 Huangguan Fen	SY93	奇花落羽 Qihua Luoyu	SY121	粉羽球 Fen Yuqiu
SY10	双红楼 Shuanghong Lou	SY38	紫红争辉Zihong Zhenghui	SY66	黄金丝 Huangjin Si	SY94	奇丽 Qi Li	SY122	粉玉珑 Fen Yulong
SY11	桃花飞雪 Taohua Feixue	SY39	紫兰魁 Zilan Kui	SY67	黄玉簪 Huang Yuzan	SY95	珊瑚多姿 Shanhu Duozi	SY123	粉玉楼 Fenyu Lou
SY12	桃花系金 Taohua Xijin	SY40	紫莲望月 Zilian Wangyue	SY68	江山如画 Jiangshan Ruhua	SY96	少女装 Shaonü Zhuang	SY124	粉云仙 Fenyun Xian
SY13	桃花争春 Taohua Zhengchun	SY41	紫绫藏金 Ziling Cangjin	SY69	金凤羽 Jinfeng Yu	SY97	胜美菊 Sheng Meiju	SY125	粉紫露金 Fenzi Lujin
SY14	桃李艳妆 Taoli Yanzhuang	SY42	紫绫金星 Ziling Jinxing	SY70	金辉 Jin Hui	SY98	胜桃花 Sheng Taohua	SY126	佛光珠影 Foguang Zhuying
SY15	晚妆粉 Wanzhuang Fen	SY43	紫楼 Zi Lou	SY71	金莲献羽 Jinlian Xianyu	SY99	奇花露霜 Qihua Lushaung	SY127	高杆红 Gaogan Hong
SY16	万代生色 Wandai Shengse	SY44	紫楼显金 Zilou Xiangjin	SY72	金星灿烂 Jinxing Canlan	SY100	莲台 Lian Tai	SY128	高莲台 Gao Liantai
SY17	乌龙集盛 Wulong Jisheng	SY45	紫盘托金 Zipan Tuojin	SY73	金玉兰盘 Jinyu Lanpan	SY101	碧天晴空 Bitian Qingkong	SY129	海棠系金 Haitang Xijin
SY18	乌龙探海 Wulong Tanhai	SY46	紫袍 Zi Pao	SY74	金簪刺红绫 Jinzan Cihongling	SY102	长凤羽 Chang Fengyu	SY130	红凤羽 Hong Fengyu
SY19	夕霞映雪 Xixia Yingxue	SY47	紫袍金带 Zipao Jindai	SY75	锦红缎 Jinhong Duan	SY103	迟粉 Chi Fen	SY131	红绫 Hong Ling
SY20	西施粉 Xishi Fen	SY48	紫绒系腰 Zirong Xiyao	SY76	锦玲飘香 Jinling Piaoxiang	SY104	大地露霜 Dadi Lushaung	SY132	红绫翠玉 Hongling Cuiyu
SY21	雪峰 Xue Feng	SY49	紫檀镶玉 Zitan Xiangyu	SY77	兰翠球 Lan Cuiqiu	SY105	大红楼 Da Honglou	SY133	红楼 Hong Lou
SY22	雪山红梅 Xueshan Hongmei	SY50	紫托绒花 Zituo Ronghua	SY78	兰玉环翠 Lanyu Huancui	SY106	东海朝阳 Donghai Chaoyang	SY134	红楼锦菊 Honglou Jinju
SY23	雪山紫玉 Xueshan Ziyu	SY51	紫艳 Zi Yan	SY79	兰玉交辉 Lanyu Jiaohui	SY107	多叶紫 Duoye Zi	SY135	红楼飘香 Honglou Piaoxiang
SY24	雪原红花 Xueyuan Honghua	SY52	紫艳飞霜 Ziyan Feishuang	SY80	兰重楼 Lan Chonglou	SY108	粉池滴脂 Fenchi Dizhi	SY136	红楼显贵 Honglou Xiangui
SY25	艳紫向阳 Yanzi Xiangyang	SY53	紫羽球 Ziyu Qiu	SY81	蓝玉藏金 Lanyu Cangjin	SY109	粉翠楼 Fen Cuilou	SY137	粉绫红花 Fenling Honghua
SY26	银边红阁 Yinbian Hongge	SY54	凌花晨浴 Linghua Chenyu	SY82	恋蝶 Lian Die	SY110	粉兰楼 Fen Lanlou	SY138	红茶花 Hong Chahua
SY27	英雄花 Yingxiong Hua	SY55	冰山 Bing Shan	SY83	玲珑玉 Linglong Yu	SY111	粉兰绣球 FenlanXiuqiu	SY139	晴雯 Qing Wen
SY28	永生红 Yongsheng Hong	SY56	艳阳天 Yanyang Tian	SY84	凌花露霜 Linghua Lushuang	SY112	粉蓝魁 Fenlan Kui	SY140	烈火金刚 Liehuo Jingang

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 1

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 2

Table 5

Table 6

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

References 35

[1]	吕长平, 刘林艳. 高温胁迫对芍药部分生理生化指标的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 34(6): 664-667.
	LÜ C P, LIU L Y. Effects of high temperature on physiological and biochemical characteristics of Paeonia lactiflora. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2008, 34(6): 664-667. (in Chinese)
[2]	于莎莎, 张楠. 中国观赏园艺产业现状与发展趋势. 现代农业科技 2020(17): 112-113.
	YU S S, ZHANG N. Present situation and development trend of ornamental horticulture industry in China. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(17): 112-113. (in Chinese)
[3]	刘林艳. 几个芍药品种的耐湿热生理生化特性研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2008.
	LIU L Y. Study on physiological and biochemical characteristics of several Paeonia lactiflora varieties in humid heat tolerance[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2008. (in Chinese)
[4]	赵大球, 韩晨霞, 陶俊. 不同芍药品种耐热性鉴定. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 36(4): 105-109.
	ZHAO D Q, HAN C X, TAO J. Heat tolerance identification of different herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) cultivars. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2015, 36(4): 105-109. (in Chinese)
[5]	张佳平, 李丹青, 聂晶晶, 夏宜平. 高温胁迫下芍药的生理生化响应和耐热性评价. 核农学报, 2016, 30(9): 1848-1856. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2016.09.1848
	ZHANG J P, LI D Q, NIE J J, XIA Y P. Physiological and biochemical responses to the high temperature stress and heat resistance evaluation of Paeonia lactiflora pall. cultivars. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 30(9): 1848-1856. (in Chinese)
[6]	张方静, 罗峰, 谭殷殷, 张旻桓, 邢文, 金晓玲. 高温胁迫对月季生理特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(4): 108-115.
	ZHANG F J, LUO F, TAN Y Y, ZHANG M H, XING W, JIN X L. Effects of high temperature stress on the physiological characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Chinese rose. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(4): 108-115. (in Chinese)
[7]	余炳伟, 董日月, 雷建军, 陈长明, 周火燕, 曹必好. 黄瓜耐热材料的筛选与鉴定. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15(11): 4695-4705.
	YU B W, DONG R Y, LEI J J, CHEN C M, ZHOU H Y, CAO B H. Screening and identification of heat resistance cucumber. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2017, 15(11): 4695-4705. (in Chinese)
[8]	毛静, 董艳芳, 周媛, 童俊, 徐冬云, 方林川. 十六个德国鸢尾品种的耐热性评价. 北方园艺, 2019(3): 94-100.
	MAO J, DONG Y F, ZHOU Y, TONG J, XU D Y, FANG L C. Physiological characteristics of different iris germanica cultivars to high temperature stress and evaluation of their heat tolerance. Northern Horticulture, 2019(3): 94-100. (in Chinese)
[9]	韩晨霞. 芍药耐热生理机制的初步研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2005.
	HAN C X. Preliminary study on physiological mechanism of heat tolerance of Paeonia lactiflora[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2005. (in Chinese)
[10]	楼柏丹, 姚岚. 几种观察植物表皮气孔方法的比较. 生物学教学, 2015(9): 42-43.
	LOU B D, YAO L. Comparison of several methods for observing stomata in plant epidermis. Biology Teaching, 2015(9): 42-43. (in Chinese)
[11]	邓绮雯, 刘志霞, 张强, 高云, 江奕君, 郑奕雄, 胡巍. 水稻叶片徒手切片的荧光显微镜观察. 仲恺农业工程学院学报, 2020, 33(1): 24-27.
	DENG Q W, LIU Z X, ZHANG Q, GAO Y, JIANG Y J, ZHENG Y X, HU W. Fluorescence microscopic observation and free-hand section techniques for rice leaves. Journal of ZhongKai University of Agriculture and Technology, 2020, 33(1): 24-27. (in Chinese)
[12]	武晓玲, 梁海媛, 杨峰, 刘卫国, 佘跃辉, 杨文钰. 大豆苗期耐荫性综合评价及其鉴定指标的筛选. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(13): 2497-2507. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.13.002.
	WU X L, LIANG H Y, YANG F, LIU W G, SHE Y H, YANG W Y. Comprehensive evaluation and screening identification indexes of shade tolerance at seedling in soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(13): 2497-2507. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.13.002. (in Chinese)
[13]	李春红, 姚兴东, 鞠宝韬, 朱明月, 王海英, 张惠君, 敖雪, 于翠梅, 谢甫绨, 宋书宏. 不同基因型大豆耐荫性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(15): 2927-2939. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.15.003.
	LI C H, YAO X D, JU B T, ZHU M Y, WANG H Y, ZHANG H J, AO X, YU C M, XIE F T, SONG S H. Analysis of shade-tolerance and determination of shade-tolerance evaluation indicators in different soybean genotypes. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(15): 2927-2939. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.15.003. (in Chinese)
[14]	GUPTA S K, VERMA K, KUMAR R, SARKAR B, MANTHA A K, KUMAR S. Priming alleviates high temperature induced oxidative DNA damage and repair using Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (Ape1L) homologue in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020, 156: 304-313. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.08.050
[15]	LOKA D A, OOSTERHUIS D M, BAXEVANOS D, NOULAS C, HU W. Single and combined effects of heat and water stress and recovery on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaf physiology and sucrose metabolism. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020, 148: 166-179. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.015
[16]	HASANUZZAMAN M, NAHAR K, ALAM M, ROYCHOWDHURY R, FUJITA M. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2013, 14(5): 9643-9684. doi: 10.3390/ijms14059643 pmid: 23644891
[17]	DUTTA S, MOHANTY S, TRIPATHY B C. Role of temperature stress on chloroplast biogenesis and protein import in pea. Plant Physiology, 2009, 150(2): 1050-1061. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.137265 pmid: 19403728
[18]	ASHRAF M, HARRIS P J C. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica, 2013, 51(2): 163-190. doi: 10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6
[19]	INZÉ D, VAN MONTAGU M. Oxidative stress in plants. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 1995, 6(2): 153-158. doi: 10.1016/0958-1669(95)80024-7
[20]	NADEEM M, LI J J, WANG M H, SHAH L, LU S Q, WANG X B, MA C X. Unraveling field crops sensitivity to heat stress: Mechanisms, approaches, and future prospects. Agronomy, 2018, 8(7): 128. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8070128
[21]	ZHANG J P, WANG X B, ZHANG D, QIU S, WEI J F, GUO J, LI D Q, XIA Y P. Evaluating the comprehensive performance of herbaceous peonies at low latitudes by the integration of long-running quantitative observation and multi-criteria decision making approach. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 15079. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51425-0 pmid: 31636314
[22]	WU Y Q, ZHAO D Q, HAN C X, TAO J. Biochemical and molecular responses of herbaceous peony to high temperature stress. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 2016, 96(3): 474-484. doi: 10.1139/cjps-2015-0255
[23]	李璇, 岳红, 王升, 黄璐琦, 马炯, 郭兰萍. 影响植物抗氧化酶活性的因素及其研究热点和现状. 中国中药杂志, 2013, 38(7): 973-978.
	LI X, YUE H, WANG S, HUANG L Q, MA J, GUO L P. Research Of different effects on activity of plant antioxidant enzymes. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2013, 38(7): 973-978. (in Chinese)
[24]	徐如强, 孙其信, 张树榛. 春小麦耐热性的筛选方法与指标. 华北农学报, 1997, 12(3): 22-29.
	XU R Q, SUN Q X, ZHANG S Z. Screening methods and indices of heat tolerance in spring wheat. Acta Agriculturae Boreall-Sinica, 1997, 12(3): 22-29. (in Chinese)
[25]	陈希勇, 孙其信, 孙长征. 春小麦耐热性表现及其评价. 中国农业大学学报, 2000, 5(1): 43-49.
	CHEN X Y, SUN Q X, SUN C Z. Performance and evaluation of spring wheat heat tolerance. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2000, 5(1): 43-49. (in Chinese)
[26]	BHUSAL N, SHARMA P, SAREEN S, SARIAL A K. Mapping QTLs for chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence in wheat under heat stress. Biologia Plantarum, 2018, 62(4): 721-731. doi: 10.1007/s10535-018-0811-6
[27]	DIAS A S, LIDON F C. Evaluation of grain filling rate and duration in bread and durum wheat under heat stress after anthesis. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2009, 195(2): 137-147. doi: 10.1111/jac.2009.195.issue-2
[28]	LÜ X K, HAN J, LIAO Y C, LIU Y. Effect of phosphorus and potassium foliage application post-anthesis on grain filling and hormonal changes of wheat. Field Crops Research, 2017, 214: 83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.001
[29]	KUMAR R R, GOSWAMI S, GUPTA R, VERMA P, SINGH K, SINGH J P, KUMAR M, SHARMA S K, PATHAK H, RAI R D. The stress of suicide: Temporal and spatial expression of putative heat shock protein 70 protect the cells from heat injury in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2016, 35(1): 65-82. doi: 10.1007/s00344-015-9508-7
[30]	VAN INGHELANDT D, FREY F P, RIES D, STICH B. QTL mapping and genome-wide prediction of heat tolerance in multiple connected populations of temperate maize. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 14418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50853-2 pmid: 31594984
[31]	李敏, 苏慧, 李阳阳, 李金鹏, 李金才, 朱玉磊, 宋有洪. 黄淮海麦区小麦耐热性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(16): 3381-3392. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.16.002.
	LI M, SU H, LI Y Y, LI J P, LI J C, ZHU Y L, SONG Y H. Analysis of heat tolerance of wheat with different genotypes and screening of identification indexes in Huang-Huai-Hai region. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(16): 3381-3392. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.16.002. (in Chinese)
[32]	蔡继鸿, 陈远华, 赖金莉, 郑薇, 胡江涛, 刘淑媛, 罗素梅, 刘小平, 郭荣生. 18个杜鹃品种耐热性评价. 现代园艺, 2022, 45(17): 6-9, 26.
	CAI J H, CHEN Y H, LAI J L, ZHENG W, HU J T, LIU S Y, LUO S M, LIU X P, GUO R S. Evaluation on heat tolerance of 18 Rhododendron varieties. Xiandai Horticulture, 2022, 45(17): 6-9, 26. (in Chinese)
[33]	凌瑞, 戴中武, 代晓雨, 吴春梅, 翟俊文, 郑泽新, 吴沙沙. 8个绣球品种耐热性综合评价与耐热指标筛选. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(8): 2209-2218.
	LING R, DAI Z W, DAI X Y, WU C M, ZHAI J W, ZHENG Z X, WU S S. Evaluation of heat tolerance and screening the index for the assessment of heat tolerance in cultivars of Hydrangea. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(8): 2209-2218. (in Chinese)
[34]	付丽军, 李聪晓, 苏胜宇, 李玉华, 周禹. 黄瓜苗期耐热种质筛选与耐热性评价体系构建. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(7): 1593-1604.
	FU L J, LI C X, SU S Y, LI Y H, ZHOU Y. Screening of cucumber germplasms in seedling stage and the construction of evaluation system for heat tolerance. Plant Physiology Journal, 2020, 56(7): 1593-1604. (in Chinese)
[35]	胡江龙, 郭林涛, 王友华, 周治国. 棉花渍害恢复的生理指示指标探讨. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(21): 4446-4453. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.21.006.
	HU J L, GUO L T, WANG Y H, ZHOU Z G. Physiological indicator of cotton plant in recovery from waterlogging damage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(21): 4446-4453. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.21.006. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

编号 Number	指标 Index	最大值 Max	最小值 Min	均值 Mean±SD	变异系数 CV (%)
X₁	热害指数 Heat damage index	0.84	0.20	0.45±0.13	28.12
X₂	株高 Plant height (cm)	100.30	37.00	70.87±10.70	15.08
X₃	冠幅 Crown breadth (cm)	129.10	41.90	86.80±15.03	17.31
X₄	叶绿素相对含量 SPAD	44.50	11.30	29.03±6.69	23.06
X₅	相对电导率 REC (%)	58.39	27.73	41.06±5.91	14.39
X₆	净光合速率 Pn (μmol CO₂·m^-2·s^-1)	36.20	0.33	9.38±6.49	69.18
X₇	有效光化学量子产量 Fv/Fm	0.84	0.27	0.73±0.07	9.76
X₈	实际光合效率 Y(Ⅱ)	0.73	0.18	0.54±0.12	22.48
X₉	非调节性能量耗散 Y(NO)	0.65	0.25	0.33±0.07	20.01
X₁₀	非光化学猝灭系数 qN	0.69	0.12	0.33±0.04	42.81
X₁₁	栅栏/海绵组织 Barrier tissue thickness/sponge tissue thickness	1.43	0.24	0.72±0.23	32.12
X₁₂	叶片厚度 Leaf thickness (μm)	402.41	190.54	293.72±47.03	16.01
X₁₃	气孔密度 Stomatal density (pcs∙mm^-2)	333.87	64.72	166.80±52.56	31.51
X₁₄	色相 b	44.00	11.40	28.08±5.80	20.4
X₁₅	色度角 H	124.70	58.80	105.59±7.03	6.66
X₁₆	丙二醛含量 MDA (nmol∙g^-1)	78.95	23.44	54.41±11.19	20.56
X₁₇	可溶性糖含量 SSC (mg∙g^-1)	33.33	3.03	18.41±5.82	31.60
X₁₈	可溶性蛋白含量 SPC (mg∙g^-1)	12.86	2.49	7.01±2.08	29.73
X₁₉	超氧化物歧化酶活性 SOD (U∙g^-1)	422.97	39.56	245.00±80.17	32.72
X₂₀	过氧化氢酶活性 CAT (nmol∙min^-1∙g^-1)	207.41	4.57	41.33±32.24	78.02
X₂₁	过氧化物酶活性 POD (U∙g^-1)	571.79	37.26	129.15±91.05	70.50

编号 Number	特征向量 Power vector
编号 Number	C₁	C₂	C₃	C₄	C₅	C₆	C₇
X₁	-0.682	-0.492	0.012	0.165	0.048	-0.066	0.121
X₂	0.281	0.253	-0.565	0.241	0.490	0.017	-0.087
X₃	0.563	0.194	-0.241	0.218	0.252	0.152	-0.198
X₄	0.633	0.378	-0.163	0.058	-0.276	0.046	0.106
X₅	-0.475	-0.035	-0.368	0.193	0.361	0.035	0.295
X₆	0.421	-0.151	0.019	0.145	-0.350	-0.327	-0.346
X₇	0.706	-0.179	0.287	0.077	0.238	0.218	0.300
X₈	0.670	-0.612	0.151	-0.105	0.239	-0.105	0.026
X₉	-0.707	0.246	-0.356	-0.163	-0.169	-0.147	-0.244
X₁₀	-0.276	0.678	0.089	0.264	-0.227	0.244	0.145
X₁₁	0.167	-0.276	0.143	0.298	-0.112	0.047	0.218
X₁₂	0.279	0.231	0.072	-0.441	-0.053	-0.076	0.447
X₁₃	-0.115	0.654	0.137	0.221	0.077	0.045	0.209
X₁₄	-0.394	0.240	0.547	-0.243	0.420	0.080	-0.137
X₁₅	0.455	-0.069	-0.281	0.398	-0.387	-0.118	0.143
X₁₆	-0.533	-0.469	-0.126	0.330	0.059	0.209	-0.062
X₁₇	0.331	0.023	-0.108	-0.303	0.028	0.550	-0.341
X₁₈	-0.405	-0.203	0.254	0.367	-0.176	0.286	0.064
X₁₉	0.023	0.075	0.467	0.146	-0.346	0.213	-0.197
X₂₀	0.278	0.150	0.288	0.508	0.307	-0.015	-0.262
X₂₁	-0.032	0.318	0.369	0.220	0.234	-0.577	-0.069
特征值 Eigenvectors	4.31	2.45	1.73	1.52	1.48	1.12	1.02
贡献率 Contribution rate	20.50	11.66	8.24	7.24	7.06	5.31	4.85
累计贡献 Accumulative contribution rate	20.50	32.16	40.41	47.65	54.71	60.02	64.87

	评价值 W	预测值 PV
评价值 W	1	0.925**
预测值 PV	0.925**	1

Evaluation of Heat Tolerance of Herbaceous Peony and Screening of Its Identification Indices

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 35

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

编号 Number	W	编号 Number	W	编号 Number	W	编号 Number	W	编号 Number	W
SY1	0.65	SY29	0.54	SY57	0.59	SY85	0.49	SY113	0.50
SY2	0.68	SY30	0.52	SY58	0.58	SY86	0.65	SY114	0.62
SY3	0.63	SY31	0.40	SY59	0.59	SY87	0.68	SY115	0.50
SY4	0.65	SY32	0.41	SY60	0.61	SY88	0.54	SY116	0.40
SY5	0.71	SY33	0.60	SY61	0.55	SY89	0.58	SY117	0.45
SY6	0.72	SY34	0.55	SY62	0.59	SY90	0.55	SY118	0.56
SY7	0.71	SY35	0.67	SY63	0.55	SY91	0.56	SY119	0.59
SY8	0.66	SY36	0.54	SY64	0.30	SY92	0.49	SY120	0.53
SY9	0.63	SY37	0.59	SY65	0.64	SY93	0.62	SY121	0.48
SY10	0.59	SY38	0.53	SY66	0.61	SY94	0.57	SY122	0.45
SY11	0.64	SY39	0.59	SY67	0.54	SY95	0.52	SY123	0.50
SY12	0.72	SY40	0.54	SY68	0.57	SY96	0.62	SY124	0.56
SY13	0.65	SY41	0.52	SY69	0.60	SY97	0.46	SY125	0.42
SY14	0.55	SY42	0.50	SY70	0.61	SY98	0.58	SY126	0.63
SY15	0.58	SY43	0.47	SY71	0.57	SY99	0.48	SY127	0.55
SY16	0.52	SY44	0.53	SY72	0.57	SY100	0.63	SY128	0.59
SY17	0.56	SY45	0.55	SY73	0.56	SY101	0.77	SY129	0.35
SY18	0.54	SY46	0.58	SY74	0.56	SY102	0.50	SY130	0.67
SY19	0.52	SY47	0.56	SY75	0.59	SY103	0.58	SY131	0.32
SY20	0.57	SY48	0.54	SY76	0.55	SY104	0.58	SY132	0.53
SY21	0.54	SY49	0.53	SY77	0.55	SY105	0.55	SY133	0.68
SY22	0.55	SY50	0.52	SY78	0.52	SY106	0.54	SY134	0.52
SY23	0.61	SY51	0.63	SY79	0.52	SY107	0.44	SY135	0.40
SY24	0.63	SY52	0.58	SY80	0.50	SY108	0.67	SY136	0.31
SY25	0.59	SY53	0.63	SY81	0.64	SY109	0.62	SY137	0.56
SY26	0.47	SY54	0.51	SY82	0.67	SY110	0.62	SY138	0.48
SY27	0.60	SY55	0.59	SY83	0.61	SY111	0.53	SY139	0.54
SY28	0.54	SY56	0.57	SY84	0.55	SY112	0.54	SY140	0.55

[1]	WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[2]	DU JinXia,LI YiSha,LI MeiLin,CHEN WenHan,ZHANG MuQing. Evaluation of Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in Different Sugarcane Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130.
[3]	ZHANG BinBin,CAI ZhiXiang,SHEN ZhiJun,YAN Juan,MA RuiJuan,YU MingLiang. Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Characters in Germplasm Resources of Ornamental Peaches [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2406-2418.
[4]	WANG ShanShan,ZHAO ChenHui,LI HongLian,ZHANG BingBing,LIANG YingHai,SONG HongWei. Analysis of Fruit Aromatic Components of Ten Plum Germplasm Resources in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2476-2486.
[5]	ZHU LingXiao,LIU LianTao,ZHANG YongJiang,SUN HongChun,ZHANG Ke,BAI ZhiYing,DONG HeZhong,LI CunDong. The Regulation and Evaluation Indexes Screening of Chemical Topping on Cotton’s Plant Architecture [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(20): 4152-4163.
[6]	SONG ChuJun,FAN FangYuan,GONG ShuYing,GUO HaoWei,LI ChunLin,ZONG BangZheng. Taste Characteristic and Main Contributing Compounds of Different Origin Black tea [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(2): 383-394.
[7]	WANG YuanPeng,HUANG Jing,SUN YuXiang,LIU KaiLou,ZHOU Hu,HAN TianFu,DU JiangXue,JIANG XianJun,CHEN Jin,ZHANG HuiMin. Spatiotemporal Variability Characteristics of Soil Fertility in Red Soil Paddy Region in the Past 35 Years—A Case Study of Jinxian County [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(16): 3294-3306.
[8]	ZHU Yan,CAI HuanJie,SONG LiBing,SHANG ZiHui,CHEN Hui. Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Oxygation Treatments Based on Fruit Yield and Quality of Greenhouse Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(11): 2241-2252.
[9]	ZHAO LiLi,LI LuSheng,CAI HuanJie,SHI XiaoHu,XUE ShaoPing. Comprehensive Effects of Organic Materials Incorporation on Soil Hydraulic Conductivity and Air Permeability [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(6): 1045-1057.
[10]	ZHAO Yong,ZHAO PeiFang,HU Xin,ZHAO Jun,ZAN FengGang,YAO Li,ZHAO LiPing,YANG Kun,QIN Wei,XIA HongMing,LIU JiaYong. Evaluation of 317 Sugarcane Germplasm Based on Agronomic Traits Rating Data [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(4): 602-615.
[11]	WANG XiaoBo,GUAN PanFeng,XIN MingMing,WANG YongFa,CHEN XiYong,ZHAO AiJu,LIU ManShuang,LI HongXia,ZHANG MingYi,LU LaHu,WEI YiQin,LIU WangQing,ZHANG JinBo,NI ZhongFu,YAO YingYin,HU ZhaoRong,PENG HuiRu,SUN QiXin. Evaluation of Heat Tolerance in Wheat Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23): 4191-4200.
[12]	SHI TianTian, HE JieLi, GAO ZhiJun, CHEN Ling, WANG HaiGang, QIAO ZhiJun, WANG RuiYun. Genetic Diversity of Common Millet Resources Assessed with EST-SSR Markers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 4100-4109.
[13]	CHEN ErYing, QIN Ling, YANG YanBing, LI FeiFei, WANG RunFeng, ZHANG HuaWen, WANG HaiLian, LIU Bin, KONG QingHua, GUAN YanAn. Variation and Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt and Alkali Tolerance of Different Foxtail Millet Cultivars Under Production Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 4050-4065.
[14]	BAI YiXiong,YAO XiaoHua,YAO YouHua,WU KunLun. Difference of Traits Relating to Lodging Resistance in Hulless Barley Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(2): 228-238.
[15]	SHI FangFang, ZHANG QingAn. Effects of Different Citric Acid Solutions on the Quality of Apricot Kernels During Debitterizing Mediated by Ultrasound Irradiation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(17): 3034-3048.