不同分子量聚天冬氨酸对小麦根系生长和养分吸收的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.13.004

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Polyaspartic acid (PASP) is a polymer of aspartic acid (ASP) with molecular weight ranging from 1000 to hundreds of thousands. Owing to its function in promoting crop growth and nutrient uptake, PASP has been widely used in agriculture, while its structure and application effect varied when its molecular weight changed. Therefore, in this study, the structural characteristics of PASP with different molecular weights were analyzed by using infrared spectroscopy, and the effects of it on wheat root growth and nutrient uptake in hydroponic experiments were investigated to clarify the characteristics and efficiency-enhanced mechanism of PASP with different molecular weights, so as to provide a theoretical basis for the scientific application for PASP in the development of new efficiency-enhanced fertilizer and agricultural production.【Method】A hydroponic experiment was carried out by using Hoagland nutrition solution and wheat (Jimai 22). Four kinds of test materials, including aspartic acid (ASP), PASP with low molecular weight (<1 kDa, PAL), PASP with medium molecular weight (3-5 kDa, PAM), and PASP with high molecular weight (>10 kDa, PAH), were separately added into the cultural solution in ratio of 10 mg·L^-1, 25 mg·L^-1 and 50 mg·L^-1, and the treatment only with Hoagland nutrient solution was set as the control group (CK). Thus, there were a total of 13 treatments, and each treatment was repeated four times. After 20-day growth, the wheat seedlings were harvested to determine shoot dry matter weight, root dry matter weight, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content as well as root morphology, root absorption area, root activity.【Result】(1) The structure of polyaspartic acid with different molecular weights was different. With the increase of molecular weight of polyaspartic acid, the content of peptide bond increased gradually, and the content of carboxyl group increased first and then decreased, among which, PAH had the highest peptide bond content, and PAM had the highest carboxyl group content. (2) The addition of PASP with different molecular weights could significantly improve the dry matter weight of wheat. The total dry matter weight of wheat was shown in the descending order: PAM>PAH>PAL≈ASP. Compared with CK, PASP increased the dry weight of wheat root by 11.90%-19.06%. Compared with CK, at the additive amount of 10 mg·L^-1, 25 mg·L^-1 and 50 mg·L^-1, the total dry weight of wheat treated by PAM increased by 9.13%, 23.36% and 20.54%, respectively. (3) Polyaspartic acid with different molecular weights could optimize wheat root morphology and increase total absorption area, active absorption area and root activity. PAM had a better performance than other PASP treatment. (4) The addition of PASP with different molecular weights could promote the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, and the greatest promotion was obtained with PAM addition, followed by PAH addition. As for the treatments with the same material, the total uptake of nutrients was the highest at 50 mg·L^-1 of PASP addition. When 50 mg·L^-1 of PAM addition, the total uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium significantly increased by 16.88%, 25.97% and 21.61% than that of CK, respectively, and that 50 mg·L^-1 of PAH addition significantly increased by 16.28%, 23.36% and 18.16% than CK, respectively. (5) Correlation analysis showed that the contents of peptide bond and carboxyl group of polyaspartic acid with different molecular weights were significantly positively correlated with total dry matter weight, total uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as well as total root length and total root absorption area. The dry matter weight and nutrient uptake of wheat were significantly or extremely significantly positively correlated with root surface area, total absorption area, active absorption area, and root activity.【Conclusion】Polyaspartic acid with different molecular weights could promote wheat growth, optimize root morphology, increase root absorption area and root activity, further promote nutrient uptake. The structure of polyaspartic acid with different molecular weights was different. With the increase of molecular weight of polyaspartic acid, the content of peptide bond increased gradually, and the content of carboxyl group increased first and then decreased. The content of peptide bond and carboxyl group of polyaspartic acid was positively correlated with wheat growth and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake. Under the conditions of this experiment, PASP with molecular weight of 3-5 kDa had the best performance on wheat root growth and nutrient uptake, followed by polyaspartic acid with molecular weight greater than 10 kDa. As for different additive amounts, PASP with high dosage (50 mg·L^-1) showed a more significant promoting effect on wheat growth and total nutrient uptake, while that with medium dosage (25 mg·L^-1) had the best performance on wheat root growth and root nutrient uptake.

Key words: polyaspartic acid, molecular weight, wheat, root, nutrient uptake

LIU Yuan,YUAN Liang,ZHANG ShuiQin,ZHAO BingQiang,LI YanTing. Effects of Polyaspartic Acid with Different Molecular Weights on Root Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Wheat[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2526-2537.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.13.004

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2022/V55/I13/2526

Figures/Tables 11

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 1

Table 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

References 37

[1]	方莉, 谭天伟. 聚天门冬氨酸的合成及其应用. 化工进展, 2001, 20(3): 24-28.
	FANG L, TAN T W. Chemical syntheses and application of polyaspartates. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2001, 20(3): 24-28. (in Chinese)
[2]	唐会会, 许艳丽, 王庆燕, 马正波, 李光彦, 董会, 董志强. 聚天门冬氨酸螯合氮肥减量基施对东北春玉米的增效机制. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 431-442. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83056
	TANG H H, XU Y L, WANG Q Y, MA Z B, LI G Y, DONG H, DONG Z Q. Increasing spring maize yield by basic application of PASP chelating nitrogen fertilizer in northeast China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(3): 431-442. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83056
[3]	曹丹, 王世震, 韩梅. 绿色环保肥料增效剂聚天冬氨酸对杨树幼苗生长的影响. 植物研究, 2021, 41(5): 712-720.
	CAO D, WANG S Z, HAN M. Effect of the environment-friendly nutrient synergist polyaspartic acid on the growth of poplar seedlings. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41(5): 712-720. (in Chinese)
[4]	陈倩, 李洪娜, 门永阁, 魏绍冲, 姜远茂. 不同聚天冬氨酸水平对盆栽平邑甜茶幼苗生长及¹⁵N-尿素利用与损失的影响. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(1): 126-129.
	CHEN Q, LI H N, MEN Y G, WEI S C, JIANG Y M. Effects on the growth of potted Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedings, utilization and loss of ¹⁵N-urea under different supply levels of polyaspartic acid. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 27(1): 126-129. (in Chinese)
[5]	徐虹, 冯小海, 徐得磊, 邱益彬. 聚氨基酸功能高分子的发展状况与应用前景. 生物产业技术, 2017(6): 92-99.
	XU H, FENG X H, XU D L, QIU Y B. Recent developments and potential applications of poly(amino acid)-based functional polymers. Biotechnology & Business, 2017(6): 92-99. (in Chinese)
[6]	杨晋辉, 刘泰, 陈艳雪, 王满, 王洪媛, 刘宏斌. 聚天门冬氨酸/盐的合成、改性及应用研究进展. 材料导报, 2018, 32(11): 1852-1862.
	YANG J H, LIU T, CHEN Y X, WANG M, WANG H Y, LIU H B. Synthesis, modification and application of polyaspartic acid/salt: The state-of-art technological advances. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(11): 1852-1862. (in Chinese)
[7]	NAGAO Y, IMAI Y, MATSUI J, OGAWA T, MIYASHITA T. Proton transport properties of poly(aspartic acid) with different average molecular weights. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2011, 43(4): 613-616. doi: 10.1016/j.jct.2010.11.016
[8]	许飞云, 张茂星, 曾后清, 朱毅勇. 水稻根系细胞膜质子泵在氮磷钾养分吸收中的作用. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(1): 106-110.
	XU F Y, ZHANG M X, ZENG H Q, ZHU Y Y. Involvement of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase in uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by rice root. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 106-110. (in Chinese)
[9]	SALAKHIEVA D V, GUMEROVA D R, AKHMADISHINA R A, KAMALOV M I, NIZAMOV I S, NEMETH C, SZILAGYI A, ABDULLIN T I. Anti-radical and cytotoxic activity of polysuccinimide and polyaspartic acid of different molecular weight. Bionanoscience, 2016, 6(4): 348-351. doi: 10.1007/s12668-016-0230-0
[10]	柯德森, 杨礼香, 巫锦雄. 光强对玉米幼苗光合特性及环境羟基自由基水平的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2013, 19(3): 404-409. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00404
	KE D S, YANG L X, WU J X. Effects of light intensity on the photosynthetic characteristics of maize seedlings and the content of atmosphere hydroxyl radical. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2013, 19(3): 404-409. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00404
[11]	徐荣, 朱凌宇, 王守红, 张家宏, 王桂良, 寇祥明, 唐鹤军, 韩光明, 吴雷明, 毕建花. 牛粪好氧发酵添加聚天冬氨酸固持氮素的机理. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(6): 1165-1178.
	XU R, ZHU L Y, WANG S H, ZHANG J H, WANG G L, KOU X M, TANG H J, HAN G M, WU L M, BI J H. Mechanism of nitrogen retention by polyaspatric acid during cow manure composting. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(6): 1165-1178. (in Chinese)
[12]	徐嘉翼, 牛世伟, 隋世江, 张鑫, 叶鑫, 蔡广兴, 王娜. 聚天门冬氨酸/盐对水稻田面水氮素变化及养分利用的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(8): 1696-1703.
	XU J Y, NIU S W, SUI S J, ZHANG X, YE X, CAI G X, WANG N. Effects of polyaspartic-acid/salt on nitrogen loss from paddy surface water and nutrients utilization. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2019, 38(8): 1696-1703. (in Chinese)
[13]	申建波. 植物营养研究方法. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2011.
	SHEN J B. Research Methods of Plant Nutrition. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[14]	赵世杰. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2002.
	ZHAO S J. Experimental Guide for Plant Physiology. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2002. (in Chinese)
[15]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D. Soil Agrochemical Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[16]	杨建昌. 水稻根系形态生理与产量、品质形成及养分吸收利用的关系. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(1): 36-46.
	YANG J C. Relationships of rice root morphology and physiology with the formation of grain yield and quality and the nutrient absorption and utilization. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(1): 36-46. (in Chinese)
[17]	刘涛, 向垒, 余忠雄, 莫测辉, 李彦文, 赵海明, 蔡全英, 李慧. 水稻幼苗对纳米氧化铜的吸收及根系形态生理特征响应. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(5): 1480-1486.
	LIU T, XIANG L, YU Z X, MO C H, LI Y W, ZHAO H M, CAI Q Y, LI H. Responses of morphological and physiological characteristics in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling roots to its uptake of CuO nanopaticles. China Environmental Science, 2015, 35(5): 1480-1486. (in Chinese)
[18]	曹本福, 陆引罡, 刘丽, 陈海念, 刘晓云, 祖庆学. 减施氮肥下聚天冬氨酸对烤烟生理特性及氮肥去向的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5): 223-229.
	CAO B F, LU Y G, LIU L, CHAN H N, LIU X Y, ZU Q X. Effects of polyaspartic acid on physiological characteristics and fate of nitrogen fertilizer in flue-cured tobacco with nitrogen fertilizer reduction. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(5): 223-229. (in Chinese)
[19]	王亮亮, 高志山, 宋涛. 聚天冬氨酸和生根剂复配对玉米根系及幼苗生长的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(22): 67-69.
	WANG L L, GAO Z S, SONG T. Effects of polyaspartic acid and rooting agent on maize root and seedling growth. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(22): 67-69. (in Chinese)
[20]	COLLA G, NARDI S, CARDARELLI M, ERTANI A, LUCINI L, CANAGUIER R, ROUPHAEL Y. Protein hydrolysates as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015, 196: 28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.037
[21]	许丽, 穆巴拉克·艾则孜, 蔡海芸, 黄梦媛, 黄光团. PASP对香根草修复富营养化水体的影响. 中国给水排水, 2012, 28(23): 90-92.
	XU L, MUBALAKE A, CAI H Y, HUANG M Y, HUANG G T. Effect of PASP on eutrophic water remediation with Vetiveria zizanioides. China Water＆Wastewater, 2012, 28(23): 90-92. (in Chinese)
[22]	IMAMURA A, HANAKI N, UMEDA H, NAKAMURA A, SUZUKI T, UEGUCHI C, MIZUNO T. Response regulators implicated in His-to-Asp phosphotransfer signaling in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998, 95(5): 2691-2696.
[23]	陈开, 唐瑭, 张冬平, 陈云, 吕冰. 生长素和细胞分裂素参与构建水稻根系的研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(12): 2495-2509.
	CHEN K, TANG T, ZHANG D P, CHEN Y, LÜ B. Recent advances in auxin-cytokinin interactions involved in shaping architecture of rice root system. Plant Physiology Journal, 2020, 56(12): 2495-2509. (in Chinese)
[24]	沈仁芳, 孙波, 施卫明, 赵学强. 地上-地下生物协同调控与养分高效利用. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(6): 566-574.
	SHEN R F, SUN B, SHI W M, ZHAO X Q. Interactions between above-and below-ground organisms for nutrient-efficient utilization. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(6): 566-574. (in Chinese)
[25]	周丽平, 袁亮, 赵秉强, 李燕婷, 林治安. 不同分子量风化煤腐殖酸对玉米植株主要代谢物的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(1): 142-148.
	ZHOU L P, YUAN L, ZHAO B Q, LI Y T, LIN Z A. Contents of the main metabolites in maize affected by humic acids with different molecular weight derived from weathered coal. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(1): 142-148. (in Chinese)
[26]	陈学思, 陈国强, 陶友华, 王玉忠, 吕小兵, 张立群, 朱锦, 张军, 王献红. 生态环境高分子的研究进展. 高分子学报, 2019, 50(10): 1068-1082.
	CHEN X S, CHEN G Q, TAO Y H, WANG Y Z, LÜ X B, ZHANG L Q, ZHU J, ZHANG J, WANG X H. Research progress in eco- polymers. Acta Polymerica Sinica, 2019, 50(10): 1068-1082. (in Chinese)
[27]	周建朝, 范晶, 王孝纯, 王艳, 邓艳红, 奚红光, 於丽华. 磷胁迫下不同基因型甜菜的光合特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(4): 910-916.
	ZHOU J C, FAN J, WANG X C, WANG Y, DENG Y H, XI H G, YU L H. Photosynthetic properties of different sugar beet genotypes under phosphorus deficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2009, 15(4): 910-916. (in Chinese)
[28]	段旭锦, 李灵芝, 张伟, 高清兰, 梁运香, 常领山, 张杰纯, 张国香, 李海平. 螯合剂HIDS对低配方营养液栽培西葫芦幼苗的影响. 中国农业气象, 2020, 41(11): 719-729.
	DUAN X J, LI L Z, ZHANG W, GAO Q L, LIANG Y X, CHANG L S, ZHANG J C, ZHANG G X, LI H P. Effect of chelating agent HIDS on summer squash seedlings cultured in low formula nutrient solution. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2020, 41(11): 719-729. (in Chinese)
[29]	DENG F, WANG L, MEI X F, LI S X, PU S L, REN W J. Polyaspartate urea and nitrogen management affect nonstructural carbohydrates and yield of rice. Crop Science, 2016, 56(6): 3272-3285. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2016.02.0130
[30]	侯晓娜. 黄腐酸和聚天冬氨酸对蔬菜氮素吸收及肥料氮转化的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013.
	HOU X N. Effects of fulvic acid and polyaspartic acid on nitrogen uptake of vegetables and transformation of fertilizer nitrogen[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013. (in Chinese)
[31]	刘红卫. 聚天冬氨酸和多肽肥料应用展望. 黑龙江农业科学, 2010(7): 162-164.
	LIU H W. Application forecasts of PASP and the multi-peptide fertilizer. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010(7): 162-164. (in Chinese)
[32]	WANG Q Y, TANG H H, LI G Y, DONG H, DONG X R, XU Y L, DONG Z Q. Polyaspartic acid improves maize (Zea mays L.) seedling nitrogen assimilation mainly by enhancing nitrate reductase activity. Agronomy, 2018, 8(9): 1-16. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8010001
[33]	王峻, 宋科, 潘剑君, 薛永, 孙丽娟, 蔡银美. 氮磷养分胁迫下小麦幼苗期生物学响应研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(2): 152-158.
	WANG J, SONG K, PAN J J, CAI Y, SUN L J, CAI Y M. Study of biologic response of wheat seedling to low nitrogen and phosphorus stress. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(2): 152-158. (in Chinese)
[34]	胡志光, 王昕, 张玉玲, 李倩. 改性聚天冬氨酸研究最新进展. 应用化工, 2014, 43(2): 360-362.
	HU Z G, WANG X, ZHANG Y L, LI Q. Latest research development of modified polyaspartic acid. Applied Chemical Industry, 2014, 43(2): 360-362.. (in Chinese)
[35]	YANG J H, LIU T, LIU H B, ZHANG D, ZHAI L M, LIU J, WANG M, CHEN Y X, CHEN B Y, WANG H Y. Biodegradable PASP can effectively inhibit nitrification, moderate NH₃ emission, and promote crop yield. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2019, 65(9): 1273-1286. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2018.1562275
[36]	倪承凡, 张富林, 吴茂前, 夏颖, 张志毅, 刘冬碧, 范先鹏, 熊桂云, 马路, 高立. 聚天门冬氨酸尿素对稻田田面水氮素浓度及产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(6): 234-239.
	NI C F, ZHANG F L, WU M Q, XIA Y, ZHANG Z Y, LIU D B, FAN X P, XIONG G Y, MA L, GAO L. Effects of polyaspartic-urea on nitrogen concentrations in surface water and yield of rice. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2020(6): 234-239. (in Chinese)
[37]	王耀强, 朱文龙, 郑凯, 李国艺, 邓伟杰, 段帅红, 曹辉. 聚天冬氨酸对植物营养液增效的研究. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(15): 62-70.
	WANG Y Q, ZHU W L, ZHENG K, LI G Y, DENG W J, DUAN S H, CAO H. Synergy of polyaspartic acid in plant nutrient solution. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(15): 62-70. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

处理 Treatment	分子量 Molecular weight	元素含量Elemental content (%)				元素摩尔比Elemental mole ratio
处理 Treatment	分子量 Molecular weight	C	H	N	O	C/N	H/C	O/C
ASP	133.10	35.80	5.01	10.62	48.57	3.37	0.14	1.36
PAL	<1 kDa	25.92	5.72	7.68	60.68	3.38	0.22	2.34
PAM	3-5 kDa	27.19	5.45	8.00	59.36	3.40	0.20	2.18
PAH	>10 kDa	26.91	5.30	8.11	59.68	3.32	0.20	2.22

处理 Treatment	添加量 Additive amount (mg·L^-1)
处理 Treatment	ASP	PAL	PAM	PAH
CK	0	0	0	0
ASP10	10	0	0	0
ASP25	25	0	0	0
ASP50	50	0	0	0
PAL10	0	10	0	0
PAL25	0	25	0	0
PAL50	0	50	0	0
PAM10	0	0	10	0
PAM25	0	0	25	0
PAM50	0	0	50	0
PAH10	0	0	0	10
PAH25	0	0	0	25
PAH50	0	0	0	50

处理 Treatment	根系干重 Root dry weight			平均 Mean	地上部干重 Ground dry weight			平均 Mean	总干重 Total dry weight			平均 Mean
处理 Treatment	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean
CK	0.42b	0.42b	0.42b	0.42	1.67ab	1.67b	1.67c	1.67	2.09b	2.09c	2.09b	2.09
ASP	0.49a	0.51a	0.49a	0.50	1.65b	1.87ab	1.8bc	1.77	2.14b	2.38ab	2.29ab	2.27
PAL	0.46ab	0.50a	0.45ab	0.47	1.66ab	1.74b	1.98ab	1.79	2.12b	2.24bc	2.43a	2.26
PAM	0.50a	0.53a	0.46ab	0.50	1.78a	2.04a	2.06a	1.96	2.28a	2.58a	2.52a	2.46
PAH	0.44ab	0.51a	0.47ab	0.47	1.75ab	1.85ab	1.98ab	1.86	2.18ab	2.36ab	2.45a	2.33

处理 Treatment	根系吸氮量 Nitrogen uptake of root			平均 Mean	地上部吸氮量 Nitrogen uptake of ground			平均 Mean	总吸氮量 Nitrogen uptake of total plant			平均 Mean
处理 Treatment	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean
CK	22.13b	22.13d	22.13b	22.13	141.13a	141.13c	141.13c	141.13	163.27a	163.27c	163.27c	163.27
ASP	22.05b	24.59c	25.51a	24.05	144.63a	144.85bc	143.29bc	144.26	166.68a	169.44c	168.79bc	168.30
PAL	22.71b	27.12b	24.16a	24.66	142.19a	141.97c	149.58b	144.58	164.90a	169.09c	173.74b	169.24
PAM	24.77a	29.40a	25.23a	26.47	142.69a	168.20a	165.59a	158.83	167.46a	197.61a	190.83a	185.30
PAH	21.75b	25.96bc	25.54a	24.42	142.80a	152.51b	164.30 a	153.20	164.56a	178.47b	189.84a	177.62

处理 Treatment	根系吸磷量 Phosphorus uptake of root			平均 Mean	地上部吸磷量 Phosphorus uptake of ground			平均 Mean	总吸磷量 Phosphorus uptake of total plant			平均 Mean
处理 Treatment	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean
CK	4.27a	4.27c	4.27c	4.27	17.22 a	17.22b	17.22c	17.22	21.49a	21.49c	21.49d	21.49
ASP	4.28a	4.65bc	5.21a	4.71	17.36a	17.36b	19.59b	18.10	21.63a	22.01bc	24.80b	22.81
PAL	4.46a	4.94b	4.31c	4.57	17.30a	17.49b	19.07b	17.95	21.76a	22.43bc	23.38c	22.52
PAM	4.44a	5.58 a	4.78b	4.93	18.46a	19.43a	22.29a	20.06	22.90a	25.00a	27.07a	24.99
PAH	4.33a	5.06 b	5.27a	4.88	17.95a	18.10ab	21.24a	19.10	22.28a	23.16b	26.51a	23.98

Effects of Polyaspartic Acid with Different Molecular Weights on Root Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Wheat

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 37

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

指标 Index	R1	R2	R3	R4	R5	R6	R7	R8	R9	R10	R11
C1	0.709**	0.795**	0.806**	0.892**	-0.335	0.376	0.720**	0.574*	0.802**	0.685**	0.558*
C2	0.750**	0.804**	0.822**	0.900**	-0.279	0.409	0.694**	0.568*	0.799**	0.680*	0.649*

干物质重与养分吸收指标 Dry matter weight and nutrient uptake index	根系指标 Root index
	R5	R6	R7	R8	R9	R10	R11
R1	0.174	0.802**	0.415	0.778**	0.778**	0.838**	0.870**
R2	-0.146	0.588**	0.648*	0.841**	0.751**	0.889**	0.728**
R3	0.015	0.549	0.498	0.621*	0.632*	0.669*	0.683*
R4	-0.202	0.559**	0.721**	0.823**	0.865**	0.873**	0.706**

[1]	ZHANG YuZhou, WANG YiZhao, GAO RuXi, LIU YiFan. Research Progress on Root System Architecture and Drought Resistance in Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1633-1645.
[2]	ZHOU Quan, LU QiuMei, ZHAO ZhangChen, WU ChenRan, FU XiaoGe, ZHAO YuJiao, HAN Yong, LIN HuaiLong, CHEN WeiLin, MOU LiMing, LI XingMao, WANG ChangHai, HU YinGang, CHEN Liang. Identification of Drought Resistance of 244 Spring Wheat Varieties at Seedling Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1646-1657.
[3]	ZHANG Ying, SHI TingRui, CAO Rui, PAN WenQiu, SONG WeiNing, WANG Li, NIE XiaoJun. Genome-Wide Association Study of Drought Tolerance at Seedling Stage in ICARDA-Introduced Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1658-1673.
[4]	YAN Wen, JIN XiuLiang, LI Long, XU ZiHan, SU Yue, ZHANG YueQiang, JING RuiLian, MAO XinGuo, SUN DaiZhen. Drought Resistance Evaluation of Synthetic Wheat at Grain Filling Using UAV-Based Multi-Source Imagery Data [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1674-1686.
[5]	ZANG ShaoLong, LIU LinRu, GAO YueZhi, WU Ke, HE Li, DUAN JianZhao, SONG Xiao, FENG Wei. Classification and Identification of Nitrogen Efficiency of Wheat Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Temporal Images [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1687-1708.
[6]	HAN XiaoJie, REN ZhiJie, LI ShuangJing, TIAN PeiPei, LU SuHao, MA Geng, WANG LiFang, MA DongYun, ZHAO YaNan, WANG ChenYang. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rates on Carbon and Nitrogen Content of Soil Aggregates and Wheat Yield [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1766-1778.
[7]	ZHAO BoHui, ZHANG YingQuan, JING DongLin, LIU BaoHua, CHENG YuanYuan, SU YuHuan, TANG Na, ZHANG Bo, GUO BoLi, WEI YiMin. A Study on the Quality Stability of Wheat Grains at Designated Locations Across Multiple Years [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1833-1844.
[8]	LI YongFei, LI ZhanKui, ZHANG ZhanSheng, CHEN YongWei, KANG JianHong, WU HongLiang. Effects of Postponing Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Flag Leaf Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Spring Wheat Under High Temperature Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(8): 1455-1468.
[9]	DONG HuiXue, CHEN Qian, GUO XiaoJiang, WANG JiRui. Research on the Mechanisms of Pre-Harvest Sprouting and Resistant Breeding in Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(7): 1237-1254.
[10]	LIU ZeHou, WANG Qin, YE MeiJin, WAN HongShen, YANG Ning, YANG ManYu, YANG WuYun, LI Jun. Utilization Efficiency of Improving the Resistance for Pre-Harvest Sprouting by Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat and Chinese Wheat Landrace [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(7): 1255-1266.
[11]	LIANG WangZhuang, TANG YaNan, LIU JiaHui, GUO XiaoJiang, DONG HuiXue, QI PengFei, WANG JiRui. Effect of Flour and Cooking/Baking Qualities by Sprouted Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(7): 1267-1280.
[12]	GAO ChenKai, LIU ShuiMiao, LI YuMing, ZHAO ZhiHeng, SHAO Jing, YU HaoLin, WU PengNian, WANG YanLi, GUAN XiaoKang, WANG TongChao, WEN PengFei. The Related Driving Factors of Water Use Efficiency and Its Prediction Model Construction in Winter Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(7): 1281-1294.
[13]	DANG JianYou, JIANG WenChao, SUN Rui, SHANG BaoHua, PEI XueXia. Response of Wheat Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency to Ploughing Time and Precipitation and Its Distribution in Dryland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(6): 1049-1065.
[14]	ZHAO KaiNan, DING Hao, LIU AKang, JIANG ZongHao, CHEN GuangZhou, FENG Bo, WANG ZongShuai, LI HuaWei, SI JiSheng, ZHANG Bin, BI XiangJun, LI Yong, LI ShengDong, WANG FaHong. Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction and Postponing for Improving Plant Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics to Increase Wheat- Maize and Annual Yield and Economic Return [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(5): 868-884.
[15]	WANG Yu, ZHANG YuPeng, ZHU GuanYa, LIAO HangXi, HOU WenFeng, GAO Qiang, WANG Yin. Effects of Localized Nitrogen Supply on Plant Growth and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Maize Seedling Under Drought Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(5): 919-934.

处理 Treatment	根系吸钾量 Potassium uptake of root			平均 Mean	地上部吸钾量 Potassium uptake of ground			平均 Mean	总吸钾量 Potassium uptake of total plant			平均 Mean
处理 Treatment	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean	10 mg·L^-1	25 mg·L^-1	50 mg·L^-1	平均 Mean
CK	16.03a	16.03b	16.03b	16.03	141.00a	141.00b	141.00c	141.00	157.03a	157.03c	157.03c	157.03
ASP	16.06a	16.85b	16.14b	16.35	140.18a	147.8b	144.36c	141.11	156.23a	164.65bc	160.50bc	160.46
PAL	15.92a	18.09b	16.03b	16.68	144.11a	145.68b	155.98b	148.59	160.03a	163.78bc	172.01b	165.27
PAM	16.12a	23.68a	17.65ab	19.15	150.06a	163.46a	173.31a	162.28	166.18a	187.14 a	190.96a	181.42
PAH	16.08a	22.40a	19.83a	19.43	150.92a	154.30ab	165.73ab	156.98	167.00a	176.70ab	185.55a	176.42