Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (15): 3042-3049.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.15.014
• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Jun(),LIN Qing,SHAO BaoQuan,REN DuanYang,LI JiaQi,ZHANG Zhe,ZHANG Hao(
)
[1] |
MEUWISSEN T H E, HAYES B J, GODDARD M E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 2001, 157(4): 1819-1829. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 |
[2] |
DAETWYLER H D, VILLANUEVA B, BIJMA P, WOOLLIAMS J A. Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2007, 124(6): 369-376. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x. |
[3] |
SCHAEFFER L R. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2006, 123(4): 218-223. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x. |
[4] |
VANRADEN P M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, 91(11): 4414-4423. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0980.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0980 |
[5] |
LEGARRA A, AGUILAR I, MISZTAL I. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009, 92(9): 4656-4663. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2061.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2061 |
[6] |
GAO N, TENG J Y, PAN R Y, LI X J, YE S P, LI J Q, ZHANG H, ZHANG X Q, ZHANG Z. Accuracy of whole genome prediction with single-step GBLUP in a Chinese yellow-feathered chicken population. Livestock Science, 2019, 230: 103817. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103817.
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103817 |
[7] |
LOPEZ B I, VITERBO V, SONG C W, SEO K S. Estimation of genetic parameters and accuracy of genomic prediction for production traits in Duroc pigs. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 2019, 64(4): 160-165. doi: 10.17221/150/2018-cjas.
doi: 10.17221/150/2018-cjas |
[8] |
SONG H L, ZHANG J X, ZHANG Q, DING X D. Using different single-step strategies to improve the efficiency of genomic prediction on body measurement traits in pig. Frontiers in Genetics, 2019, 9: 730. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00730.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00730 |
[9] |
CHANG C C, CHOW C C, TELLIER L C, VATTIKUTI S, PURCELL S M, LEE J J. Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. GigaScience, 2015, 4(1): s13742-15. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8.
doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8 |
[10] |
BROWNING B L, BROWNING S R. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2009, 84(2): 210-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005 |
[11] | R CORE TEAM. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing[DB/CD]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL Http://Www R-Project Org/, 2013. |
[12] |
VITEZICA Z G, AGUILAR I, MISZTAL I, LEGARRA A. Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. Genetics Research, 2011, 93(5): 357-366. doi: 10.1017/s001667231100022x.
doi: 10.1017/s001667231100022x |
[13] |
CHEN C Y, MISZTAL I, AGUILAR I, LEGARRA A, MUIR W M. Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale. Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 89(9): 2673-2679. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3555.
doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3555 |
[14] |
FORNI S, AGUILAR I, MISZTAL I. Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE, 2011, 43(1): 1. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-1.
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-1 |
[15] |
CHRISTENSEN O F, MADSEN P, NIELSEN B, OSTERSEN T, SU G. Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs. Animal, 2012, 6(10): 1565-1571. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000742.
doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000742 |
[16] | MRODE R A. Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. |
[17] |
DRUET T, MACLEOD I M, HAYES B J. Toward genomic prediction from whole-genome sequence data: Impact of sequencing design on genotype imputation and accuracy of predictions. Heredity, 2014, 112(1): 39-47. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.13.
doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.13 |
[18] |
赵云翔, 邝伟键, 高宁, 李私丞, 彭兴, 郭金彪, 朱晓萍. 杜洛克公猪背膘厚度、日增重、日采食量和饲料效率相关性状的遗传参数估计. 家畜生态学报, 2019, 40(11): 18-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2019.11.004.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2019.11.004 |
ZHAO Y X, KUANG W J, GAO N, LI S C, PENG X, GUO J B, ZHU X P. Estimation of genetic parameters of growth and feed efficiency related traits in YX China-line duroc specialized strain. Acta Ecologae Animalis Domastici, 2019, 40(11): 18-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2019.11.004. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2019.11.004 |
|
[19] |
叶健, 傅金銮, 张锁宇, 叶道武, 李庆岗, 陈景明, 金娉婷, 张士媛, 王爱国. 安徽省猪育种核心群场间联系性和遗传参数估计. 中国畜牧杂志, 2015, 51(18): 62-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2015.18.013.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2015.18.013 |
YE J, FU J L, ZHANG S Y, YE D W, LI Q G, CHEN J M, JIN P T, ZHANG S Y, WANG A G. Estimation of genetic parameters and connectedness in pig breeding nucleus herds of AnHui Province. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 51(18): 62-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2015.18.013. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2015.18.013 |
|
[20] |
BIDANEL J P, DUCOS A, LABROUE F, GUÉBLEZ R, GASNIER C. Genetic parameters of backfat thickness, age at 100 kg and meat quality traits in Pietrain pigs. Annales De Zootechnie, 1994, 43(2): 141-149. doi: 10.1051/animres:19940204.
doi: 10.1051/animres:19940204 |
[21] |
YE J, TAN C, HU X X, WANG A G, WU Z F. Genetic parameters for reproductive traits at different parities in Large White pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 2018, 96(4): 1215-1220. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky066.
doi: 10.1093/jas/sky066 |
[22] |
KIM H J. Genetic parameters for productive and reproductive traits of sows in multiplier farms[D]. University Goettingen Repository, 2001. doi: 10.53846/goediss-1851.
doi: 10.53846/goediss-1851 |
[23] |
GAO H, KOIVULA M, JENSEN J, STRANDÉN I, MADSEN P, PITKÄNEN T, AAMAND G P, MÄNTYSAARI E A. Short communication: Genomic prediction using different single-step methods in the Finnish red dairy cattle population. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(11): 10082-10088. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14913.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14913 |
[24] | GUILLAUME F, BOICHARD D, DUCROCP V. Genomic selection in dairy cattle. Productions Animales, 2011, 24(4): 363-368. |
[25] |
CESARANI A, GASPA G, CORREDDU F, CELLESI M, DIMAURO C, MACCIOTTA N P P. Genomic selection of milk fatty acid composition in Sarda dairy sheep: Effect of different phenotypes and relationship matrices on heritability and breeding value accuracy. Journal of Dairy Science, 2019, 102(4): 3189-3203. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15333.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15333 |
[26] |
唐振双, 殷东, 尹立林, 马云龙, 项韬, 朱猛进, 余梅, 刘小磊, 李新云, 邱小田, 赵书红. 猪基因组选择 “两步走” 策略的计算机模拟评估. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(21): 4677-4684. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.21.016.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.21.016 |
TANG Z S, YIN D, YIN L L, MA Y L, XIANG T, ZHU M J, YU M, LIU X L, LI X Y, QIU X T, ZHAO S H. To evaluate the “two-step” genomic selection strategy in pig by simulation. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4677-4684. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.21.016. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.21.016 |
|
[27] |
张金鑫, 唐韶青, 宋海亮, 高虹, 蒋尧, 江一凡, 弥世荣, 孟庆利, 于凡, 肖炜, 云鹏, 张勤, 丁向东. 北京地区大白猪基因组联合育种研究. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(12): 2161-2170. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.013.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.013 |
ZHANG J X, TANG S Q, SONG H L, GAO H, JIANG Y, JIANG Y F, MI S R, MENG Q L, YU F, XIAO W, YUN P, ZHANG Q, DING X D. Joint genomic selection of Yorkshire in Beijing. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(12): 2161-2170. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.013. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.013 |
|
[28] |
LI X, ZHANG Z, LIU X, CHEN Y. Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine. Animal, 2019, 13(9): 1804-1810. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003567.
doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003567 |
[29] |
KARIMI K, SARGOLZAEI M, PLASTOW G S, WANG Z Q, MIAR Y. Opportunities for genomic selection in American mink: A simulation study. PLoS ONE, 2019, 14(3): e0213873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213873.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213873 |
[1] | ZHU Mo,ZHENG MaiQing,CUI HuanXian,ZHAO GuiPing,LIU Yang. Comparison of Genomic Prediction Accuracy for Meat Type Chicken Carcass Traits Based on GBLUP and BayesB Method [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 5125-5131. |
[2] | TANG ZhenShuang,YIN Dong,YIN LiLin,MA YunLong,XIANG Tao,ZHU MengJin,YU Mei,LIU XiaoLei,LI XinYun,QIU XiaoTian,ZHAO ShuHong. To Evaluate the “Two-Step” Genomic Selection Strategy in Pig by Simulation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4677-4684. |
[3] | ZHANG JinXin, TANG ShaoQing, SONG HaiLiang, GAO Hong, JIANG Yao, JIANG YiFan, MI ShiRong, MENG QingLi, YU Fan, XIAO Wei, YUN Peng, ZHANG Qing, DING XiangDong. Joint Genomic Selection of Yorkshire in Beijing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(12): 2161-2170. |
[4] | ZHU Bo, WANG Yan-hui, NIU Hong, CHEN Yan, ZHANG Lu-pei, GAO Hui-jiang, GAO Xue, LI Jun-ya, SUN Shao-hua. The Strategy of Parameter Optimization of Bayesian Methods for Genomic Selection in Livestock [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(22): 4495-4505. |
|