Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (20): 3585-3594.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.20.009

• PLANT PROTECTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

In vitro Evaluation of Strawberry Germplasm Resources for Resistance to Anthracnose

YongChao HAN(),XiangGuo ZENG,FaYun XIANG,Cong GUO,QingHua ZHANG,FengYing CHEN,Wei GUAN   

  1. Institute of Industrial Crops, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Hubei Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Enhancement and Genetic Improvement, Wuhan 430064
  • Received:2019-05-13 Accepted:2019-05-29 Online:2019-10-16 Published:2019-10-28
  • Contact: YongChao HAN E-mail:hyc660@126.com

Abstract:

【Objective】 The objective of this study is to evaluate the anthracnose resistance level of 71 strawberry accessions including 24 accessions from 12 Fragaria species, 41 cultivars from Fragaria × ananassa and 6 interspecific hybrids, and to provide a basis for the utilization of strawberry germplasm resources in resistance breeding.【Method】 Colletotrichum fructicola isolate Gwha-1, which was isolated from strawberry petiole, was used as inoculation pathogen. The suspension of C. fructicola (1×10 6 conidia/mL) was evenly inoculated on the leaf surface and petiole of strawberry leaves by in vitro inoculation method. Inoculated leaves were moisturized at 28℃ for 4 days, and then the incidence of each leaf was investigated. The lesion number on leaf surface, the largest lesion diameter on leaf surface, and the maximum lesion length on petiole were counted. Correlation analysis was performed on the lesion length on petiole, the lesion number and the lesion diameter on leaf surface of different materials using IBM SPSS 15.0 software. The disease severity of each leaf was ranked according to the lesion length on petiole. The disease index of each material was calculated, and the anthracnose resistance of the tested materials was evaluated based on the disease index of petiole after inoculation with C. fructicola isolate Gwha-1. The general linear model procedure (PROC GLM) in SAS was used to analyze the differential significance (P<0.05) among five strawberry species, including F. × ananassa (41 accessions), F. mandschurica (3 accessions), F. viridis (4 accessions), F. nilgerrensis (3 accessions), and interspecific hybrids (6 accessions). Species were used as fixed factors and tested materials as random factors.【Result】 There was no completely immune material to anthracnose caused by C. fructicola in the tested materials, and all materials had different degrees of disease incidence after 4 days of inoculation with C. fructicola isolate Gwha-1. The comparison of different materials showed that the lesion length on leaf petiole was positively correlated with the lesion number on leaf and the lesion diameter on leaf surface after inoculation. According to the lesion length on petiole after inoculation with C. fructicola, the anthracnose resistance of the tested materials could be distinguished. The numbers of materials with anthracnose resistance level of high resistance, resistance, medium resistance, medium susceptibility, susceptibility and high susceptibility were 17, 20, 21, 3, 6 and 4, respectively, 81.7% of the tested materials had medium resistance, resistance or higher resistance level to anthracnose caused by C. fructicola. ‘3 Gongzhu’ ‘Senga Sengana’ ‘Darselect’ ‘Allstars’ ‘Kaorino’ ‘Veestar’ and ‘Jingzangxiang’ in the F. × ananassa, and ‘Tokun’ in interspecific hybrids had high resistance to anthracnose. In the wild species of strawberry, the resistance level of all the F. mandschurica, F. viridis and F. orientalis tested materials was high resistance, and the disease index of F. mandschurica and F. viridis was significantly lower than that of F. × ananassa. 【Conclusion】 The anthracnose resistance of 71 strawberry resources was evaluated. Seven cultivars of high resistance to anthracnose were selected from the cultivated strawberries, including ‘3 Gongzhu’ ‘Senga Sengana’ ‘Darselect’ ‘Allstar’ ‘Kaorino’ ‘Veestar’ and ‘Jingzangxiang’. There are high anthracnose resistant resources in F. mandschurica and F. viridis. Their resistance level to anthracnose is significantly higher than that of F. × ananassa, which can be used as an antigen source of anthracnose in interspecific hybridization.

Key words: strawberry, germplasm resources, Colletotrichum fructicola, anthracnose, resistance

Fig. 1

Symptoms after inoculation on strawberry petiole with different resistance levels"

Fig. 2

Correlation analysis of disease severity index"

Table 1

Resistance level of strawberry germplasm resources to anthracnose"

种类
Species
品种或编号
Cultivar or material
病情指数
Disease index
抗性水平
Resistance level
来源
Source
东北草莓F. mandschurica HBYCM023 1.85 高抗HR 中国黑龙江Heilongjiang, China
HBYCM009 2.47 高抗HR 中国吉林Jilin, China
HBYCM016 4.94 高抗HR 中国黑龙江Heilongjiang, China
黄毛草莓F. nilgerrensis HBYCM019 19.75 抗病R 中国四川Sichuan, China
HBYCM015 28.40 中抗MR 中国贵州Guizhou, China
HBYCM018 14.81 抗病R 中国云南Yunnan, China
绿色草莓F. viridis HBYCM005 2.47 高抗HR 中国新疆Xinjiang, China
HBYCM004 4.94 高抗HR 中国新疆Xinjiang, China
HBYCM022 9.88 高抗HR 中国新疆Xinjiang, China
HBYCM010 8.64 高抗HR 中国新疆Xinjiang, China
森林草莓F. vesca HBYCM024 11.11 抗病R 日本Japan
HBYCM013 13.58 抗病R 中国吉林Jilin, China
西藏草莓F. nubicola HBYCM026 30.86 中抗MR 德国German
五叶草莓F. pentaphylla HBYCM006 28.40 中抗MR 中国甘肃Gansu, China
HBYCM003 34.57 中抗MR 中国四川Sichuan, China
东方草莓F. orientalis HBYCM005 9.88 高抗HR 中国黑龙江Heilongjiang, China
HBYCM007 2.47 高抗HR 中国黑龙江Heilongjiang, China
伞房草莓F. corymbosa HBYCM017 100.00 高感HS 中国山西Shanxi, China
西南草莓 F. moupinensis HBYCM021 11.11 抗病R 中国西藏Tibet, China
HBYCM002 11.11 抗病R 中国西藏Tibet, China
麝香草莓F. moschata HBYCM014 11.11 抗病R 加拿大Canada
弗州草莓F. virginiana HBYCM008 12.35 抗病R 美国America
HBYCM020 11.11 抗病R 德国German
智利草莓F. chilioensis HBYCM011 11.11 抗病R 美国America
种间杂交种
Interspecific hybrids
桃薰Tokun 6.17 高抗HR 日本Japan
粉红佳人Fenhongjiaren 12.35 抗病R 中国China
白草莓1号Baicaomei No.1 16.05 抗病R 中国China
粉佳人Pink Beauty 23.46 中抗MR 中国China
粉公主Pink Princess 28.40 中抗MR 中国China
俏佳人Pretty Beauty 28.40 中抗MR 中国China
凤梨草莓F. × ananassa 3公主3 Gongzhu 4.94 高抗HR 中国China
森加森加拉Senga Sengana 6.17 高抗HR 德国German
达赛莱克特Darselect 8.64 高抗HR 法国France
全明星Allstar 8.64 高抗HR 美国America
威斯塔尔Veestar 8.64 高抗HR 加拿大Canada
香野Kaorino 8.64 高抗HR 日本Japan
种类
Species
品种或编号
Cultivar or material
病情指数
Disease index
抗性水平
Resistance level
来源
Source
京藏香Jingzangxiang 9.88 高抗HR 中国China
甘露Ganlu 11.11 抗病R 中国China
鬼努甘Kinuama 11.11 抗病R 日本Japan
白雪公主Snow White 12.35 抗病R 中国China
九天红韵Jiutianhongyun 12.35 抗病R 中国China
红玉Hongyu 13.58 抗病R 中国China
章姬Akihime 13.58 抗病R 日本Japan
京桃香Jingtaoxiang 14.81 抗病R 中国China
甜查理Sweet Charlie 18.52 抗病R 美国America
07-D-5 20.99 中抗MR 中国China
秀丽Xiuli 22.22 中抗MR 中国China
丰香Toyonoka 23.46 中抗MR 日本Japan
京留香Jingliuxiang 23.46 中抗MR 中国China
京怡香Jingyixiang 23.46 中抗MR 中国China
京郊小白Jingjiaoxiaobai 24.69 中抗MR 中国China
晶悦Jingyue 25.93 中抗MR 中国China
里瓦Riva 25.93 中抗MR 荷兰Netherlands
艳丽Yanli 25.93 中抗MR 日本Japan
京泉香Jinquanxiang 27.16 中抗MR 中国China
特里拉Tenira 28.40 中抗MR 美国America
晶玉Jingyu 30.86 中抗MR 中国China
天香Tianxiang 30.86 中抗MR 中国China
晶硕Jingshuo 38.93 中抗MR 中国China
京凝香Jingningxiang 53.09 中感MS 中国China
黔莓1号Qianmei No.1 55.56 中感MS 中国China
幸香Sachinoka 55.56 中感MS 日本Japan
雪里香Xuelixiang 60.49 感病S 韩国Korea
越心Yuexin 65.43 感病S 中国China
红颜Benihoppe 67.90 感病S 日本Japan
宁丰Ningfeng 67.90 感病S 中国China
硕丽Shuoli 67.90 感病S 中国China
宁玉Ningyu 75.31 感病S 中国China
晶瑶Jingyao 85.19 高感HS 中国China
甜宝Tianbao 85.19 高感HS 中国China
小白Xiaobai 85.19 高感HS 中国China

Table 2

Disease index of different strawberry resources after inoculated with C. fructicola"

种类
Species
倍性
Chromosome ploidy
份数
Number of accessions
叶面病斑数量
Lesion number on leaf surface
叶面病斑直径
Lesion diameter on leaf surface (cm)
叶柄病斑长度
Lesion length on petiole (cm)
叶柄病情指数
Disease index of petiole
东北草莓F. mandschurica 2x 3 0 0 0.03 (0.02-0.04) 3.09a (1.85-4.94)
黄毛草莓F. nilgerrensis 2x 3 0.93 (0-2.00) 0.24 (0-0.69) 0.27 (0.02-0.40) 20.99ab (14.81-28.40)
绿色草莓F. viridis 2x 4 0.06 (0-0.25) 0.02 (0-0.07) 0.05 (0.02-0.09) 6.48a (2.47-9.88)
森林草莓F. vesca 2x 2 0.51 (0.44-0.58) 0.29 (0.10-0.49) 0.11 (0.11-0.12) 12.35 (11.11-13.58)
西藏草莓F. nubicola 2x 1 2.00 0.28 0.24 30.86
五叶草莓F. pentaphylla 2x 2 0.94 (0.56-1.33) 0.09 (0.09-0.09) 0.38 (0.33-0.43) 31.48 (28.40-34.57)
东方草莓F. orientalis 4x 2 0.08 (0-0.17) 0.01 (0-0.01) 0.04 (0.02-0.07) 6.17 (2.47-9.88)
伞房草莓F. corymbosa 4x 1 3.50 2.22 5.62 100.00
西南草莓 F. moupinensis 4x 2 1.38 (0.44-2.31) 0.06 (0-0.11) 0.10 (0.09-0.10) 11.11 (11.11-11.11)
麝香草莓F. moschata 6x 1 0.11 0.01 0.11 11.11
弗州草莓F. virginiana 8x 2 0.11 (0-0.22) 0.01 (0-0.02) 0.13 (0.11-0.16) 11.73 (11.11-12.35)
智利草莓F. chilioensis 8x 1 1.08 0.47 0.14 11.11
凤梨草莓F. × ananassa 8x 41 1.34 (0-7.44) 0.10 (0-0.59) 0.46 (0.04-2.22) 33.75b (4.94-85.19)
种间杂交种Interspecific hybrids 8x, 10x 6 0.26 (0-0.89) 0.02 (0-0.05) 0.14 (0.07-0.20) 19.14ab (6.17-28.40)
[1] FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2017. Building resilience for peace and food security[R]. Rome, 2017.
[2] HAMMERSCHLAG F, GARCES S, KOCH-DEAN M, RAY S, LEWERS K, MAAS J, SMITH B J . In vitro response of strawberry cultivars and regenerants to Colletotrichum acutatum. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2006,84(3):255-261.
[3] DEAN R, VAN KAN J A, PRETORIUS Z A, HAMMOND-KOSACK K E, DI PIETRO A, SPANU P D, RUDD J J, DICKMAN M, KAHMANN R, ELLIS J, FOSTER G D . The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2012,13(4):414-430.
[4] 任小杰, 梁艳, 陆金萍, 杨百荣, 徐敬友, 戴富明 . 上海地区草莓炭疽病病原鉴定. 植物病理学报, 2008,38(3):325-328.
REN X J, LIANG Y, LU J P, YANG B R, XU J Y, DAI F M . Identification of the pathogen of strawberry anthracnose in Shanghai. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 2008,38(3):325-328. (in Chinese)
[5] 向发云, 韩永超, 曾祥国, 张鹏, 吴润玲, 冯小明, 顾玉成 . 湖北省草莓育苗期炭疽病病害调查. 湖北农业科学, 2012,51(24):5650-5653.
XIANG F Y, HAN Y C, ZENG X G, ZHANG P, WU R L, FENG X M, GU Y C . A survey on the strawberry anthracnose disease in Hubei Province. Hubei Agricultural Science, 2012,51(24):5650-5653. (in Chinese)
[6] HAN Y C, ZENG X G, XIANG F Y, ZHANG Q H, GUO C, CHEN F Y, GU Y C . Carbendazim sensitivity in populations of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides complex infecting strawberry and yams in Hubei Province of China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018,17(6):1391-1400.
[7] MANGANDI J, PERES N A, WHITAKER V M . Identifying resistance to crown rot caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in strawberry. Plant Disease, 2015,99(7):954-961.
[8] 王丰, 马跃, 高秀岩, 张志宏 . 草莓品种对炭疽病抗性的鉴定技术研究. 果树学报, 2008,25(4):542-547.
WANG F, MA Y, GAO X Y, ZHANG Z H . Study on the identification techniques for determining strawberry cultivar’s resistance to anthracnose. Journal of Fruit Science, 2008,25(4):542-547. (in Chinese)
[9] 靳宝川, 张雷, 邢冬梅, 张国珍 . 11个草莓品种对炭疽病的田间抗性表现. 植物保护, 2014,40(2):123-126, 131.
JIN B C, ZHANG L, XING D M, ZHANG G Z . Disease occurrence and resistance of 11 strawberry cultivars to anthracnose in the field. Plant Protection, 2014,40(2):123-126, 131. (in Chinese)
[10] STAUCT G . The species of Fragaria, their taxonomy and geographical distribution. Acta Horticulturae, 1989,265:23-34.
[11] 高凤娟 . 野生草莓种质资源在草莓育种中的应用. 北方果树, 1999(3):1-4.
GAO F J . The utilization of wild strawberry germplasm resources on strawberry breeding. Northern Fruits, 1999(3):1-4. (in Chinese)
[12] 雷家军, 代汉萍, 谭昌华, 邓明琴, 赵密珍, 钱亚明 . 中国草莓属(Fragaria)植物的分类研究. 园艺学报, 2006,33(1):1-5.
LEI J J, DAI H P, TAN C H, DENG M Q, ZHAO M Z, QIAN Y M . Studies on the taxonomy of the strawberry (Fragaria) species distributed in China. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2006,33(1):1-5. (in Chinese)
[13] 雷家军, 薛莉, 代汉萍 . 草莓十二倍体种间杂种的获得及其回交研究. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(22):4651-4659.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.22.011
LEI J J, XUE L, DAI H P . Obtaining dodecaploid interspecific hybrid in strawberry and its backcross. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012,45(22):4651-4659. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.22.011
[14] 黄金凤 . 野生草莓种质资源对胶孢炭疽菌的抗性研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012.
HUANG J F . Evaluation for some wild Fragaria germplasms resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012. ( in Chinese)
[15] HIRVI T, HONKANEN E . The volatiles of two new strawberry cultivars, ‘Annelie’ and ‘Alaska Pioneer’, obtained by backcrossing of cultivated strawberries with wild strawberries, Fragaria vesca, rügen and Fragaria virginiana . Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung, 1982,175(2):113-116.
[16] RAHMAN M, OJIAMBO P, LOUWS F . Initial inoculum and spatial dispersal of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, the causal agent of strawberry anthracnose crown rot. Plant Disease, 2015,99(1):80-86.
[17] ZHANG X, BATZER J C, LI X, PERES N A, GLEASON M L . Validation of a Florida strawberry anthracnose fruit rot (AFR) warning system in Iowa. Plant Disease, 2019,103(1):28-33.
[18] FREEMAN S, RODRIGUEZ R J . Differentiation of Colletotrichum species responsible for anthracnose of strawberry by arbitrarily primed PCR. Mycological Research, 1995,99(4):501-504.
[19] XIAO C L, MACKENZIE S J, LEGARD D E . Genetic and pathogenic analyses of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates from strawberry and noncultivated hosts. Phytopathology, 2004,94(5):446-453.
[20] DAMM U, CANNON P F, WOUDENBERG J H, CROUS P W . The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex. Studies in Mycology, 2012,73(1):37-113.
[21] WEIR B S, JOHNSTON P R, DAMM U . The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. Studies in Mycology, 2012,73(1):115-180.
[22] 韩永超, 向发云, 曾祥国, 张鹏, 顾玉成 . 草莓根颈腐烂病的病原鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2014,47(1):53-60.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.01.006
HAN Y C, XIANG F Y, ZENG X G, ZHANG P, GU Y C . Identification of pathogen causing crown and root rot on strawberry. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014,47(1):53-60. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.01.006
[23] HAN Y C, ZENG X G, XIANG F Y, REN L, CHEN F Y, GU Y C . Distribution and characteristics of Colletotrichum spp. associated with anthracnose of strawberry in Hubei, China. Plant Disease, 2016,100(5):996-1006.
[24] JAYAWARDENA R S, HUANG J K, JIN B C, YAN J Y, LI X H, HYDE K D, BAHKALI A H, YIN S L, ZHANG G Z . An account of Colletotrichum species associated with strawberry anthracnose in China based on morphology and molecular data. Mycosphere, 2016,7(8):1147-1163.
[25] HORIUCHI S, HORI M . A simple greenhouse technique for obtaining high levels of clubroot incidence. Bulletin of the Chugoku National Agricultural Experiment Station,E, 1980,17:33-55.
[26] 张国珍 . 我国对草莓炭疽根腐病的重视程度亟待提高. 植物保护, 2015,41(2):234-236.
ZHANG G Z . Urgent attention to anthracnose root rot of strawberry is highly needed in China. Plant Protection, 2015,41(2):234-236. (in Chinese)
[27] 忻雅, 马华升, 阮松林, 童建新, 方献平, 肖文斐 . 草莓炭疽病抗性室内快速鉴定方法研究及应用. 果树学报, 2013,30(6):1072-1076.
XIN Y, MA H S, RUAN S L, TONG J X, FANG X P, XIAO W F . A rapid laboratory method for identifying strawberry resistance to anthracnose and its application. Journal of Fruit Science, 2013,30(6):1072-1076. (in Chinese)
[28] 李贺, 代红艳, 刘月学, 马跃, 吴迪, 张志宏 . 草莓新品种‘艳丽’. 园艺学报, 2015,42(4):799-800.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014-0485
LI H, DAI H Y, LIU Y X, MA Y, WU D, ZHANG Z H . A new strawberry cultivar ‘Yanli’. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2015,42(4):799-800. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014-0485
[29] 韩永超, 曾祥国, 向发云, 陈丰滢, 顾玉成 . 草莓新品种晶玉对炭疽病和灰霉病的抗性鉴定. 湖北农业科学, 2015,54(13):3153-3156.
HAN Y C, ZENG X G, XIANG F Y, CHEN F Y, GU Y C . Resistance identification of strawberry cultivar Jingyu to anthracnose and gray mold. Hubei Agricultural Science, 2015,54(13):3153-3156. (in Chinese)
[30] 张运涛, 王桂霞, 董静, 王萍 . 草莓优良品种甜查理及其栽培技术. 中国果树, 2006(1):22-23, 61.
ZHANG Y T, WANG G X, DONG J, WANG P . Sweet Charlie of strawberry variety and its cultivation techniques. China Fruits, 2006(1):22-23, 61. (in Chinese)
[31] 马鸿翔, 陈佩度 . 黄毛草莓与凤梨草莓种间杂种的获得及其细胞遗传学分析. 中国农业科学, 2004,37(12):1966-1970.
MA H X, CHEN P D . Production and cytogenetics of interspecific hybrids from the cross of Fragaria nilgerrensis Schlecht and F. ananassa Duch. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004,37(12):1966-1970. (in Chinese)
[32] 马鸿翔, 陈佩度 . 草莓属低倍性野生资源在育种中利用的研究进展. 果树学报, 2003,20(4):305-309.
MA H X, CHEN P D . Advances in research of using wild strawberry species with lower ploidy in strawberry breeding. Journal of Fruit Science, 2003,20(4):305-309. (in Chinese)
[33] 雷家军, 望月龙也, 邓明琴 . 草莓属二倍体种东北草莓(Fragaria mandschurica Staudt)研究. 果树学报, 2001,18(6):337-340.
LEI J J, MOCHIZUKI T, DENG M Q . Studies on the diploid strawberry species Fragaria mandschurica Staudt. Journal of Fruit Science, 2001,18(6):337-340. (in Chinese)
[34] 代汉萍, 雷家军, 闫玉华, 李宏宇 . 红花草莓优良品种粉红熊猫及其栽培技术. 中国果树, 2005(6):43-44, 63.
DAI H P, LEI J J, YAN Y H, LI H Y . The pink-flowered strawberry cv. Pink Panda and its cultivation techniques. China Fruits, 2005(6):43-44, 63. (in Chinese)
[35] 雷家军, 薛莉, 代汉萍, 邓明琴 . 红花草莓新品种‘粉佳人’和‘俏佳人’. 园艺学报, 2015,42(3):599-600.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014-0188
LEI J J, XUE L, DAI H P, DENG M Q . Two new pink-flowered strawberry cultivars ‘Pink Beauty’ and ‘Pretty Beauty’. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2015,42(3):599-600. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014-0188
[1] ZHANG XiaoLi, TAO Wei, GAO GuoQing, CHEN Lei, GUO Hui, ZHANG Hua, TANG MaoYan, LIANG TianFeng. Effects of Direct Seeding Cultivation Method on Growth Stage, Lodging Resistance and Yield Benefit of Double-Cropping Early Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[2] LIU Jiao,LIU Chang,CHEN Jin,WANG MianZhi,XIONG WenGuang,ZENG ZhenLing. Distribution Characteristics of Prophage in Multidrug Resistant Escherichia coli as well as Its Induction and Isolation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1469-1478.
[3] WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[4] GUO ZeXi,SUN DaYun,QU JunJie,PAN FengYing,LIU LuLu,YIN Ling. The Role of Chalcone Synthase Gene in Grape Resistance to Gray Mold and Downy Mildew [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1139-1148.
[5] YAN LeLe,BU LuLu,NIU Liang,ZENG WenFang,LU ZhenHua,CUI GuoChao,MIAO YuLe,PAN Lei,WANG ZhiQiang. Widely Targeted Metabolomics Analysis of the Effects of Myzus persicae Feeding on Prunus persica Secondary Metabolites [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1149-1158.
[6] WANG Kai,ZHANG HaiLiang,DONG YiXin,CHEN ShaoKan,GUO Gang,LIU Lin,WANG YaChun. Definition and Genetic Parameters Estimation for Health Traits by Using on-Farm Management Data in Dairy Cattle [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1227-1240.
[7] ZHANG YaLing, GAO Qing, ZHAO Yuhan, LIU Rui, FU Zhongju, LI Xue, SUN Yujia, JIN XueHui. Evaluation of Rice Blast Resistance and Genetic Structure Analysis of Rice Germplasm in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 625-640.
[8] WANG MengRui, LIU ShuMei, HOU LiXia, WANG ShiHui, LÜ HongJun, SU XiaoMei. Development of Artificial Inoculation Methodology for Evaluation of Resistance to Fusarium Crown and Root Rot and Screening of Resistance Sources in Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 707-718.
[9] XIANG MiaoLian, WU Fan, LI ShuCheng, WANG YinBao, XIAO LiuHua, PENG WenWen, CHEN JinYin, CHEN Ming. Effects of Melatonin Treatment on Resistance to Black Spot and Postharvest Storage Quality of Pear Fruit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 785-795.
[10] HU ChaoYue, WANG FengTao, LANG XiaoWei, FENG Jing, LI JunKai, LIN RuiMing, YAO XiaoBo. Resistance Analyses on Wheat Stripe Rust Resistance Genes to the Predominant Races of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 491-502.
[11] TANG ZiYun,HU JianXin,CHEN Jin,LU YiXing,KONG LingLi,DIAO Lu,ZHANG FaFu,XIONG WenGuang,ZENG ZhenLing. Relationship Between Biofilm Formation and Molecular Typing of Staphylococcus aureus from Animal Origin [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 602-612.
[12] LI ZhiLing,LI XiangJu,CUI HaiLan,YU HaiYan,CHEN JingChao. Development and Application of ELISA Kit for Detection of EPSPS in Eleusine indica [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4851-4862.
[13] ZHANG Qi,DUAN Yu,SU Yue,JIANG QiQi,WANG ChunQing,BIN Yu,SONG Zhen. Construction and Application of Expression Vector Based on Citrus Leaf Blotch Virus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4398-4407.
[14] DU JinXia,LI YiSha,LI MeiLin,CHEN WenHan,ZHANG MuQing. Evaluation of Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in Different Sugarcane Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130.
[15] FENG AiQing,WANG CongYing,ZHANG MeiYing,CHEN Bing,FENG JinQi,CHEN KaiLing,WANG WenJuan,YANG JianYuan,SU Jing,ZENG LieXian,CHEN Shen,ZHU XiaoYuan. Pathotype Analysis of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in Main Rice Producing Regions of China and Establishment of Differential Hosts of Near-Isogenic Lines [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4175-4195.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!